Gas phase characterization by photoelectron spectroscopy of unhindered α-heterosubstituted...
-
Upload
thierry-pigot -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Gas phase characterization by photoelectron spectroscopy of unhindered α-heterosubstituted...
Gas phase characterization by photoelectron spectroscopy
of unhindered a-heterosubstituted germylenes [1]
Thierry Pigot, Severine Foucat, Genevieve Pfister-Guillouzo*
Laboratoire de Chimie Theorique et Physico-Chimie Moleculaire, CNRS UMR 5624/ FR 2606, Universite de Pau & des Pays de l’Adour,
Avenue de l’Universite, F-64000 Pau, France
Received 17 September 2004; revised 4 November 2004; accepted 8 November 2004
Available online 28 January 2005
Abstract
Two unhindered a-heterosubstituted (O and S) cyclic germylenes have been generated and characterized by the combination of flash
vacuum thermolysis of stable germacyclopentenes and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy. This coupling associated with ab initio
calculations with the hybrid functional B3LYP and the 6-311G(d) basis set allows to predict the electronic properties of the generated
germylenes. The thermodynamic stabilization of these reactive molecules by electronic delocalization of the heteroatom p lone pairs within
the 4p orbitals of the germanium atom is clearly shown.
q 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: UV-photoelectron spectroscopy; Flash vacuum thermolysis; DFT calculations; Germylenes
1. Introduction
Germylenes have been extensively studied for the last
20 years [2]. Most of these compounds, like the silicon or
carbon analogs, are short live species. They could be
indirectly characterized by trapping reactions with various
substrates, i.e. dienes, diones, etc. Without a quencher
present, germylenes easily undergo polymerization. To
avoid the oligomerization, bulky ligands on germanium may
be used. In this case germylene shows a monomeric state in
the gas phase and/or the solid state (kinetic stabilization)
[3]. Another way of stabilizing germylenes can be achieved
by incorporating various special donor groups such as –NH2
[4], –OR [5], –PR [6] (RZsilyl, alkyl, aryl) or by
complexing them with transition metals [7]. Examples of
intramolecular coordination with base ligands can be found
in recent literature [8]. However, these molecules need to
remain quite hindered around the Ge(II) atom, because
otherwise their reactivity is too high to allow characteri-
zation by classical techniques.
0022-2860/$ - see front matter q 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.11.025
* Corresponding author. Tel.: C33 5 59 40 75 82; fax: C33 5 59 40 75
88.
E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Pfister-Guillouzo).
Studies on stable imidazol-2-ylidene [9,10] 2-silaimida-
zol-2-ylidene and 2-germa-imidazol-2-ylidene [12a], have
prove that photoelectron spectroscopy associated with DFT
calculations provide a unique approach to characterize these
molecules.
Electronic structure of diaminogermylene was explored
particularly since the pionnering work of Harris and Lappert
on Ge(N(SiMe3)2)2 [11], mainly 2-germa-imidazol-2-yli-
dene A [12] and 2-germa-imidazolin-2-ylidene B [13].
However, some points on the explanation of the stability of
these species, in particular B [14], are still heavily debated.
These 2-germa-imidazolin-2-ylidene with R:tBu are stable
at room temperature but we described recently [15] the
characterization of a less hindered 2-germa imidazolin-2
ylidene B (R:Et) 2c by ultraviolet photoelectron spec-
troscopy. Much less information is known about the
oxygen or the sulfur substituted germylenes analogs. Their
reactivities have been well described by Dousse and
Lavayssiere [16] and their formation confirmed by mass
spectroscopy [16c].
This paper deals with the characterization of two cyclic
saturated heteroatomic a-substitued germylenes (S, O).
These compounds were generated by flash vacuum
thermolysis (FVT) and characterized directly by UV-PES.
Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–43
www.elsevier.com/locate/molstruc
Scheme 1.
T. Pigot et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–43 37
This coupling FVT/PES has been successfully used in our
laboratory for the detection of low coordinated group 14
compounds [17]. The synthetic pathway used in this work is
the well known cycloreversion of germacyclopentenes
adequately substituted (Scheme 1).
It seems that these experimental conditions exclude the
formation of dimeric species, due to the fact that the
Si(ButNCH2CH2NBut) analog has been shown to undergo
reversible dimerisation upon sublimation [11].
Our experimental results are supported by the estimation
of the energies of the first vertical ionization potentials (IPv),
based on the analysis of the Kohn–Sham orbitals and the
corresponding eigenvalues, as used by Arduengo and
coworkers [9] for the interpretation of photoelectronic
spectra of compounds A and isologues.
All the theoretical evaluations were performed with the
DFT theory ab B3LYP/6-311G(d) level of theory.
These photoelectronic experimental data, with the first
ones published on non-hindered a-hetero-germylenes, allow
us to estimate the influence of the substituent on the
germanium nucleophilicity and to visualize the importance
of the p delocalization.
1.1. Study of thermolysis of sulfur compound 1a
The following is an interpretation of the spectrum for the
precursor which is displayed in Fig. 1a, based on the
experimental data of sila(germa)cyclopent-3-ene serie [18],
cyclogermathianes [19] and dimercaptomethanes [20].
The double bond carbon–carbon cyclopentenic ring
ionization is observed at 8.5 eV. According to the higher
intensity at 8.8 eV, we have attributed this band to two
ionization processes: ejection of an electron from sulfur
atom p lone pair in-phase and out-of-phase combinations.
The sulfur atoms p lone pair out-of-phase combination and
the GeS and GeC bonds are ionized in the second band at
10.4 eV.
At 913 K this PES is modified and it indicates that the
thermolysis of the precursor is complete (Fig. 1b). We
observed the systematic formation of dimethylbutadiene
(DMB) by the characteristic ionization potentials at 8.7,
10.3 and 11.4 eV. The spectrum 1c, which is obtained after
the digital subtraction of the DMB spectrum, could be
associated to the germylenes 2a.
To confirm this hypothesis we have carried out a quantic
study of the privilegied forms of 2a and calculated their
ionization energies.
The geometrical parameters are displayed in Fig. 2. We
highlight a unique minimum on the potential energy surface
for this cyclic compound 2a. The cycle adopts a twisted
conformation to minimize interactions between the meth-
ylene groups (twist angle 388). The angle to germanium is
938, the GeS bond lenght is 2.27 A.
One transition state (TS) has been found on the potential
energy surface of 2a. It corresponds to a coplanar structure,
energetically very close to the minimum (4.58 kc). Thus,
taking into account this small energetic difference, a rapid
interconversion between two twist forms is expected to
occur in gas phase.
The interpretation of PES is made on the basis of
calculated energies of the Kohn–Sham orbitals (3iKS) for 2a
and 2a (TS) (Table 1). Arduengo and co-workers [9] first
used DFT calculations at the non-local level to assign the
PES of 2-germaimidazol-2-ylidene. Werstiuk [21], Rade-
macher [22] and ourselves [23] have verified for different
compounds that 3iKS could be linked to the experimental
vertical ionization potentials by a uniform shift of x.
The value of x is taken as xZ jK3i HOMO K IPcalcIV j. This
approach is justified if the first vertical ionization potential
calculated, IPIVcalc, as the difference between ET(cation) and
ET(molecule) lies very close to experimental values
(Table 1).
Hoffman has recently shown that the localization of KS
orbitals are very similar to those obtained after HF
calculations [24]. So it is possible to identify more precisely
the nature of the first ionization and to interpret unambigu-
ously the photoelectron spectrum.
Fig. 3 shows graphical representation of the first five
occupied KS orbitals and the LUMO for 2a.
The computed DSCF value and estimated values of IP’s
are both in excellent agreement with the experimental data.
The first band at 9.0 eV is attributed to the ejection of an
electron from the out-of-phase p sulfur lone pairs
combination. The ionization of germanium lone pair is
observed at 9.3 eV. The ionization of the in-phase p sulfur
lone pairs combination corresponds to the band at 10 eV.
The bands at 10.3 and 11.9 eV are attributed to the
ionizations of Ge–S bonds and s sulfur lone pairs,
respectively.
We notice that the gap between the ionization energies of
sulfur atoms p lone pairs bonding and antibonding
combinations is 1 eV. This gap shows a clear stabilization
of the bonding combination due to an important delocaliza-
tion from the sulfur atom lone pairs into the germanium
atom pp vacant orbital (Fig. 3 LUMO and HOMO-3). NBO
analysis [25] shows in fact that the germanium pp vacant
orbital is occupied by 0.35 e.
Fig. 1. PE Spectra of 1a at (a) 300 K (b) 913 K and DMB spectrum (c) at 913 K after digital substraction of DMB spectrum.
T. Pigot et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–4338
In the previously studied nitrogen homologue 2c [15]
(2-germaimidazol-2 germylene) we have observed a 1.4 eV
gap and an occupation of the pp vacant orbital of
germanium of 0.32 e. Nevertheless, in this case the angle
Fig. 2. Optimized structur
to germanium is more acute (858) allowing a spacial
interaction of 2ppN–ppN. In spite of the length of GeS bond
the p delocalization is favored by the 3ppS–4ppGe
overlapping.
es of 2a, 2b and 2c.
Table 1
Kohn–Sham energies (K3i), calculated (IPv cal.), estimated (IPv est.) and vertical ionization potentials for 2a and 2a (TS) with experimental values (in eV)
Nature npKS
nGe KnsCS
npCS
nsKS
KsGe S nsþS
KsC S
2a K3iKS 6.7 7.1 7.6 8 9.5
IPv (calc.) 8.8 9.43
IPv (est.) 8.9 9.3 9.8 10.2 11.7
2a (T.S.) K3iKS 6.6 7.1 7.75 7.8 9.85
IPv (calc.) 8.66 9.23 9.97
IPv (est.) 8.7 9.2 9.85 9.9 11.95
IP (exp.) 8.9 9.3 10 10.2 12
T. Pigot et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–43 39
1.2. Study of thermolysis of dioxolane compound 1b
We realized the interpretation of 1b precursor
spectrum displayed in Fig. 4 with the support of
germacyclopentenes, trimeric and tetrameric dimethyl
germoxane [26] photoelectron studies. We have assigned
Fig. 3. Graphical representations of the LUMO a
the first band at 8.7 eV to the germacyclopentenic pCaC
orbital ionization energy. The ionic state associated to
the ejection of an electron from the oxygen atoms p lone
pairs in-phase combination nOpC (strong interaction with
the GeC bonds) is observed at 9.0 eV. The band at
10.0 eV is assigned to the out-of-phase interactions of
nd the five first KS orbitals of 2a, and 2c.
Fig. 4. PE Spectra of 1b at (a) 300 K; (b) 773 K and DMB Spectrum (c) 773 K after digital substraction of DMB spectrum.
T. Pigot et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–4340
the nOpK and the sGe–C out-of-phase. The IP’s associated
to sGeO bonds out-of-phase combination is observed in
the broad signal around 11.4 eV.
Up to 723 K we observed a notable modification of
the spectrum. The characteristic DMB ionizations appear
at 8.7, 10.3 and 11.4 eV (Fig. 4b). After we substract the
PE spectrum of DMB from the thermolysis one we
obtained the spectrum displayed in Fig. 4c. The latter
could correspond to the dioxogermylene 2b PE spectrum.
The reaction of thermolysis is not complete and we
observe at 9 eV the first band of weak intensity of the
precursor.
To confirm this hypothesis, we carried out a
theoretical evaluation of the geometric and electronic
parameters of 2b.
Similar to the sulfur derivatives, we characterized a
minimum on the potential energy surface of 2b in the
fundamental singlet state (Fig. 2). 2b is slightly twisted,
with a twist angle of 238 which is less than in the sulfur
analog. The inversion barrier is calculated to be 0.52 kcal/
mol. According to the NBO the analysis the germanium
atom pp is occupied by 0.25 e. The delocalization of
the lone pairs electrons on the oxygen atoms seems weaker
than in the sulfur derivatives, despite a short GeO distance
Table 2
Kohn–Sham energies (K3i), calculated (IPv cal.), estimated (IPv est.) and vertical ionization potentials for 2b and 2b (TS) with experimental values (in eV)
Nature npKO
nGe KnsCO
npCO
nsKO
KsGe O
2b K3iKS 7.37 7.58 8.57 8.67 9.32
IPv (calc.) 9.75
IPv (est.) 9.75 10.0 11.0 11.1 11.7
2b (T.S) K3iKS 7.56 7.56 8.67 8.67 9.31
IPv (calc.) 9.6 9.94
IPv (est.) 9.6 9.96 11.0 11.0 11.7
IP (exp.) 9.8 10 11 11.6
Table 3
The NBO analysis results
pp (Ge) q (Ge) q (X) s GX (% X) Lone pair Ge (% s)
2a 0.35 0.52 K0.20 72 14s 86p 85.7
2b 0.25 1.18 K0.89 87 22s 77p 86.3
2c 0.32 0.98 K1.04 82 31s 69p 81.6
T. Pigot et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–43 41
(1.81 A), resulting in the lower polarizability of oxygen lone
pair electrons but also in a less favorable 2pp–4pp
overlapping with regard to sulfur derivative.
In Table 2 we report the Kohn–Sham orbital energies and
in Fig. 3 the graphical representation of the first five
occupied KS orbitals and the LUMO of 2b. The first ionic
state is evaluated at 9.75 eV for 2b and 9.6 eV for 2b (T.S).
The first band of the spectrum centered at 10 eV (Fig. 4c)
with a shoulder at 9.7 eV can be assigned to the two first
ionizations: out-of-phase p pairs combination of the oxygen
atoms and germanium lone pair. Around 11 eV we find the
in-phase combination of p lone pairs of the oxygen atoms
and out-of-phase combination of s lone pairs of oxygens
and the s GeO bonds.
The bands are large due to the fast inversion of the cycle.
As for the sulfur compound we observe a gap of 1.3 eV
between the ionization associated the out-of-phase and in-
phase p lone pair combinations.
This is in agreement with a delocalization towards the
4pp vacant orbital of the germanium. This gap is close to
the one observed for the nitrogen derivative 2c. For these
two systems the angle to germanium is 898 for O and 848 for
N, favorable to a spacial interaction 2pp–2pp between the
two heteroatoms, which increases the gap. However, in spite
of a GeO length shorter than the Ge–N one, the occupation
of the Ge 4pp orbital is more important for the nitrogen
derivative (mesomeric effect more important).
If the p donation seems less important for the oxygen
derivative than for the sulfur derivative, we observe on an
other hand a clear stabilization (about 0.8 eV) of the
ionization energy of the germanium lone pair.
2. Conclusion
The coupling FVT–PES associated with the ab initio
calculations have allowed an unambiguous characterization
of two homoleptic (O and S) cyclic germylenes. PES allows
a direct visualization of the pp–pp delocalization; stabili-
zation of the ionization potential associated to the ejection
of an electron from the in-phase combination of the
heteroatom lone pairs.
This delocalization, due to the ring-strain, decreases
according to the NBO data in the order of SONOO.
All the synthesis tests for obtaining acyclic dithioger-
mylenes lead to polymer formation, contrary to dioxo
and diamino germylenes. Therefore the pp–pp delo-
calization is not the only bonding feature that can solely
explain the a-heterosubstituted germylenes thermo-
dynamic stabilization. Cioslowski [27] suggested that
for carbenes, the unusual stability is related to the
substantial s back-donation from the carbenic atom to
the adjacent nitrogen atoms. The calculated charge
distribution (Table 3) shows a weak polarization for 2a
compared to 2b and 2c. The electronegativity effect (OONOS) should modify in the same way the nucleophili-
city of the germanium lone pair. We have experimentally
observed, for this lone pair, the ionization potentials in
the following order: O: 10, S: 9.2, N: 8.5 eV.
This points out the difficulty in rationalizing the
importance of s polarization. The order observed for the
germanium lone pair ionization is explained by
the particular hybridization of germanium. The Ge–X
bonds have a strong p character on germanium and the
heteroatom. Due to the respective positions of the energies
of these orbitals with, 4p Ge: 7.90 eV, 3p S: 10.36 eV, 2p O:
13.62 eV and 2p N: 14.53 eV we have observed (NBO data)
a more important participation of the 4 s orbital for Ge–N
bond and therefore a stronger p character for the lone pair
(lower ionization energy).
The calculated gap HOMO-1 and LUMO also allows to
estimate the substituant effects (mesomeric and s attractor).
It is of the same order of magnitude for the oxygen and
T. Pigot et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–4342
nitrogen derivatives and smaller for the sulfur derivatives
(Fig. 3).
This agrees with Ciolowski’s conclusions on carbenes,
especially for germylenes where the p donation is weaker
(overlapping with 4pp orbital) and the retro-donation is
stronger (Ge more electropositive).
To conclude the two effects of both p donating and saccepting of the substituant contribute to the stabilization of
a germylene. For example, the amino group (strong pdonor) and the oxgroup (strong s acceptor both) appear to
be good electron-active substituents. The steric protection,
which is possible for the amino group, explains the success
of the synthesis reported on numerous diamino germylenes.
3. Experimental section
3.1. Coupling FVT–PES
Photoelectron spectra were recorded on an Helectros
0078 spectrometer. This one was monitored by a micro-
computer system supplemented by a digital analogic
converter. The spectra were built with 2000 points and
were accurate within 0.1 eV. They were recorded with
21.21 eV HeI irradiation as photon source and calibrated on
well known helium autoionization at 4.98 eV [HeII(He)]
and nitrogen ones at 15.59 eV.
Thermolysis experiments have been performed with a
short path thermolysis (SPT) with an internal heating device,
STP permitted to analyze both species with short life time
and their decomposition products because of high vacuum
(w10K5 mbar) and short distance (25 mm) minimizing
intermolecular collisions [28]. Under these conditions, it is
estimated that the detection of thermolysis products with life
times from 10K1 to 10K3 could be performed.
4. Computational details
Calculations were performed with the GAUSSIAN 98
program [29–30] using the density functional theory [31].
The various structures were fully optimized at B3LYP level
[32] and the second derivatives were calculated in order to
determine if a minimum or a transition state (one negative
eigen value) existed for the resulting geometry. This
functional is built with Becke’s three parameter exchange
functional [32a] and the Lee–Yang Pair correlation func-
tional [32c].
Graphical representations of the nature of the molecular
orbitals were obtained using MOLDEN program [33]. The
electronic structure of the molecules is examined using the
natural bond orbital (NBO) partitioning scheme [25].
5. Synthesis of precursors
All reactions were carried out under a dry nitrogen
atmosphere. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a
Bruker AC 400 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts were
reported in ppm relative to TMS as a reference. Mass
spectra were obtained under electron impact (70 eV) after
direct introduction of samples into a 5972 Mass Selective
Detector (Hewlett Packard), only characteristic fragments
are listed. Elementar analysis were performed at the
‘Laboratoire Central d’Analyses du CNRS’, Lyon, France.
6. General procedure
A solution of 1,1-dichloro-2,3-dimethylgermacyclopent-
3-ene (2.5 M) in diethylether was added dropwise to a
suspension of the lithium salt of the ethylendithiol or
ethyleneglycol in stoechiometric proportions (prepared
from thiol or alcool and 1.5 M BuLi in pentane). The
mixture was refluxed for 2 h, then the solvent was removed
in vaccum. The residue was washed with pentane and
filtered to eliminate LiCl. Concentrating by distillation in
vaccum of the resulting oil afforded the desired compound.
1a: bp: 65 8C (0.5 torr), yield: 65%1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.76 (m, 6H, CH3); 2.07 (m, 4H,
CH2Ge); 3.09 (s, 4H, CHsS) 13C NMR (CDCl3): 18.8 (CH3);
30.6 (CH2); 37.1 (CH2); 130.1 (CaO); MS (m/z): 248
(MC%), 166 (M-DMB). Anal. calc. for C8H14S2Ge: C,
38.71%; H, 5.64%. Found: C, 38.04%; H, 5.78%.
1b: bp: 60 8C (0.2 torr), yield: 70% 1H NMR (CDCl3):
1.77 (m, 6H, CH3); 2.22 (m, 4H, CH2); 3.92 (s, 4H, CHs)13C
NMR (CDCl3): 18.8 (CH3); 28.3 (CH2); 32.7 (CH2); 129.0
(CaC); MS (m/z): 216 (MC%), 134 (M-DMB). Anal. calc.
for C8H14O2Ge: C, 44.44%; H, 6.48%. Found: C, 44.02%;
H, 6.14%.
Acknowledgements
G. Pfister-Guillouzo thanks for discussion and technical
support K. Miqueu and JM Sotiropoulos from Pau/UMR
5624/CNRS. We also thank Dr G. Schaftenaar for allowing
us to use his graphic program MOLDEN.
References
[1] Part 68: Application of Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Molecular
Properties. For Part 67: see. K. Miqueu, J.M. Sotiropoulos, G. Pfister-
Guillouzo, V.L. Rudzevich, H. Gornitzka, V. Lavallo, V.D.
Romanenko, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2004) 2289.
[2] (a) Recent reviews on Germylenes Chemistry: J. Barrau, G. Rima,
Coord. Chem. Rev. Part I 178 (1998) 593;
(b) M. Driess, H. Grutzmacher, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 35
(1996) 828;
(c) O. Kuhl, Coord. Chem. Rev. 248 (2004) 411.
T. Pigot et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 782 (2006) 36–43 43
[3] P. Jutzi, H. Schmidt, B. Neumann, H.G. Stammler, Organometallics
15 (1996) 741.
[4] (a) M.F. Lappert, P.P. Power, M.J. Slade, J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. (1979) 369;
(b) M.F. Lappert, M.J. Slade, J.L. Afwood, Zaworotko, J. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun. (1980) 621;
(c) R.W. Chorley, P.B. Hitchcok, M.F. Lappert, W.P. Leung, P.P.
Power, M.O. Olmstead, Inorg. Chim. Acta 198 (1992) 203;
(d) A. Meller, C.P. Grabe, Chem. Ber. 118 (1985) 2020.
[5] (a) T. Fjelberg, P.B. Hitchcok, M.F. Lappert, S.J. Smith, A.J. Thorne,
J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1985) 939;
(b) B. Cetinkaya I. Gumrukeu M.F. Lappert, J.L. Atwood, R. Shakir,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (1977) 2088.
[6] M. Driess, R. Janoscheck, H. Pritzkow, S. Rell, U. Winckler, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Ing. 107 (1995) 1746.
[7] N. Tokitoh, K. Manmaui, R. Okazaki, Organometallics 13 (1994) 167.
[8] (a) R.S. Foley, Y. Zhou, G.P.A. Yap, D.R. Richeson, Inorg. Chem. 39
(2000) 924;
(b) A. Filippou, P. Portius, G. Kociok-Kohn, V. Albrecht, J. Chem.
Soc. Dalton Trans. (2000); 1759;
(c) W.P. Leung, L.H. Weng, W. Kuok, Z. Zhou, Z. Zhang, T.C. Mak,
Organometallics 18 (1999) 1482.
[9] A.J. Arduengo, H. Bock, H. Chen, M. Denk, A.D. Dixon, J.C. Green,
W.A. Herrmann, N.L. Jones, M. Wagner, R. West, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
116 (1994) 6641.
[10] M. Denk, J.C. Green, N. Metzler, M.J. Wagner, Chem. Soc. Dalton
Trans. (1994); 2405.
[11] D. Harris, M.J. Lappert, Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1974); 895.
[12] (a) W.A. Herrmann, M. Denk, J. Behm, W. Scherer, F. Klingan,
H. Bock, B. Solouki, M. Wagner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
(1992); 1485;
(b) O. Kuhl, P. Lonnecke, J. Heinicke, Polyhedron 20 (2001) 2215.
[13] C. Boheme, G. Frenking, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 2039.
[14] J.F. Lehmann, S.G. Urquhart, L.E. Ennis, A. Hitchcock, K. Hatamo,
S. Gupta, M.K. Denk, Organometallics 18 (1999) 1862.
[15] A. Laporte-Chrostowska, S. Foucat, T. Pigot, V. Lemiere, G. Pfister-
Guillouzo, Main Group Met. Chem. 25 (2002) 55.
[16] (a) H. Lavayssiere, G. Dousse, G. Satge, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays Bas
107 (1988) 440;
(b) H. Lavayssiere, G. Dousse, G. Satge, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon
53 (1990) 411;
(c) S. Mazieres, H. Lavayssiere, G. Dousse, G. Satge, Inorg. Chim
Acta 252 (1996) 25.
[17] (a) S. Foucat, T. Pigot, G. Pfister-Guillouzo, H. Lavayssiere,
S. Mazieres, Organometallics 18 (1999) 5322;
(b) V. Metail, S. Joanteguy, A. Chrostowska-Senio, G. Pfister-Guil-
louzo, A. Systerman, J.L. Ripoll, Inorg. Chem. 36 (1972) 1482.
[18] C. Guimon, G. Pfister-Guillouzo, G. Manuel, P. Mazerolles,
J. Organomet. Chem. 149 (1978) 149.
[19] J.L. Garcia, D. Gonbeau, G. Pfister-Guillouzo, M. Roch, J. Weber,
Can. J. Chem. 63 (1985) 1518.
[20] C. Guimon, M.F. Guimon, G. Pfister-Guillouzo, Tetrahedron Lett. 17
(1975) 1413.
[21] (a) H. Muchall, N. Werstiuk, J. Pitters, M. Workentin, Tetrahedron
55 (1999) 3767;
(b) H. Muchall, N. Werstiuk, B. Choudury, J. Ma, J. Warkentin,
J. Pezacki, Can. J. Chem. 76 (1998) 238;
(c) H. Muchall, N. Werstiuk, B. Choudury, Can. J. Chem. 76 (1998)
221.
[22] H. Muchall, P. Rademacher, J. Mol. Struct. 471 (1998) 189.
[23] K. Miqueu, J.M. Sotiropoulos, G. Pfister-Guillouzo,
H. Ramaivonjatovo, J. Escudie, J. Mol. Struct. 545 (2001) 139.
[24] R. Stowasser, R. Hoffmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 3414.
[25] A.E. Reed, L.A. Curtiss, F. Weinhold, Chem. Rev. 88 (1988) 899.
[26] C. Guimon, G. Pfister-Guillouzo, G. Rima, M. El Almine, J. Barrau,
Spectr. Lett. 18 (1985) 7.
[27] J. Cioslowski, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 27 (1993) 309.
[28] Fora detailed description of FVT/PES coupling see: Y. Vallee,
J.L. Ripoll, S. Lacombe, G. Pfister-Guillouzo, J. Chem. Res. (Synop.)
(1990); 40.
[29] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb,
J.R. Cheeseman, V.G. Zakrzewski, J.A. Montgomery, R.E. Stratman,
J.C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J.M. Millam, A.D. Daniels, K.N. Kudin,
M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B.
Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G.A.
Petersson, P.Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D.K. Malick, A.D.
Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J.B. Foresman, J. Cioslowswi, J.V. Ortiz,
A.G. Baboul, B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I.
Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al-
Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe,
P.M.W. Gill, B. Jonhson, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, J.L. Andres, M.
Head-Gordon, E.S. Replogle, J.A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 98, Revision A.7,
Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
[30] W.J. Hehre, L. Radom, P.v.R. Schleyer, J.A. Pople, Ab Initio
Molecular Orbital Theory, Wiley, New York, 1986.
[31] R.G. Parr, W. Yang, Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules in:
R. Breslow, J.B. Goodenough (Eds.),, Oxford University Press, New
York, 1989.
[32] (a) A.D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A38 (1988) 3098;
(b) A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648;
(c) C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B37 (1988) 785.
[33] G. Schaftenaar, J.H. Noordik, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 14
(2000) 123.