FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation

FSO Project Meeting (online)

30.07.2015

AGENDA

1) SWOT-Feedback and consequences2) Next steps3) Updates

a. Serviceb. Net Ball

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation

Objective: Moving towards a gobal industry standard

FSO – FEDAS Standardisation Organisation

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation Outlook & Options

STATUS QUO

PRO ACTIVE

PASSIVE

The sport industry

community get the feling that

the PCLK is dead

Promote the PCK

&Agree on

additionalCommon coding

Slowly stop promoting and

further developing the

PCK STOP

SWOT Analysis

PROJECT-2017 “FEDAS Version 3”

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation Milestones

Project Presentaion and discussion

Steering Committee accept the lunch of the pre-study

A SWOT feedback form was distributed, the result collected and presented to the project team

Steering Committee will on their meeting in September decide if FEDAS 3.0 shall be developed

Jan.2015Task Force

Jan. 2015Steering Comm

July 2015SWOT

analysis

Sept.2015Steering Comm.

Firts ideas of FEDAS 3.0 to be presented

Jan.2016FEDAS 3.0

Project sign-off by Steering Committee

Feb.2016Steering Comm.

Roll-out of FEDAS 3.0

Jan.2017Roll-Out

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation PROJECT 2017

- New activity concept- Color code- Size code- ---

SWOT Analysis

PROJECT-2017 “FEDAS Version 3”

Announcement Event

ISPO 2016

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation SWOT Feedback

STRENGTHHelpful to achieve the objective

WEAKNESSESHarmful to achieve the objective

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation SWOT - STRENGTH

STRENGTH

WEAKNESSES

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

Uniformity - Communication- statistics,

Unique and Logic

Not complex(simplification of article handling)

User-friendly(even for consumer /

online platforms)

User-friendly for all size of companies

Statistics according to main groups and or

activities (BW)

Covers the major part of the existing

products on the market

Well structured classification code

Implemented and well accepted by many leading retailers

Continuity over the past / < 15 years

= Industry standard

No better solution available in our

industry

Top down approach

Statistics internal and external comparisons (Gfk: market reports)

FlexibleSpace for new product

groups

Available (online DB) and maintained in

multiple languages

= KFS

Key Success Factor

Accurate

Can be used as internal key or as parallel key (simplifying transfer)

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation SWOT - WEAKNESSES

STRENGTH WEAKNESSES

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

The code has a limitation (6-digits)

Not all activities are covered by the

concept

The key is only used by certain retailers, some major retailer missing

Not detailed enough

Suppliers sometimes feel forced to provide

the code

Colors, material and sizes not covered

= KKS

Key Killer

Factor

Mainly used in Europe

Gender only for textile and some other limited

product groups

Not category drive

More training to show the user the benefit

Multisport is the basket for everything

Hardly any new retailers or brands have

started using the key

Independent organisation founded

by a few members only

Translation sometimes not good enough

Multi-Sport & 2x Leisure activities are

much to broad

Awareness: executive management & users

No key advantages for the suppliers/brands

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation

SWOT - OPPORTUNITY

STRENGTH WEAKNESSES

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

FEDAS to be used by everyone within our

industry

Focus on a more global positioning

Motivate more suppliers/brands to use

the code

Adding category to each sport (activity)

Extend the key to be feasible also for

specialised shops

Clear code for color, gender and sizes range

Adding additional business like service,

rental

Make market reports available

Motivate WFSGI to promote and host the PCK

Stronger involvement of the industry to cover

better our need

Offer report functionality

Maintain EN/CE norm info

Link to standard code information like HS, recycling

info, inco term 2000,…..

Extend the structure to grant more granularity

Improve the data standard integrity within Product Main Group (focus

on silhouette) & Product Sub-Group (focus on Gender-Age)

ERP integration, cooperation with ERP

providers

Improve code standard integrity around Compete,

Train, Teamsport, Replica, Fan & Fashion/Leisure Styles

Create advantages for the suppliers/brands

(e.g. feedback market figures)

= KFS

Key Success Factor

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation SWOT - THREATS

STRENGTH WEAKNESSES

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

A new version can be too complicate

Cost and effort of changing is too high

Some company will stick to the old version

Chaos if we permit the use of both versions

Other upcoming standards, lunched by global retailers

such as Amazon, Taobao, Ali Baba Group etc.

Benefits of new FEDAS PCK are not substantial enough to

motivate users to make change

= KKS

Key Killer

Factor

Danger of adding unnecessary codes to

the new concept

Lack of interest

Switching to GPC (global Prod Code) of

GS1

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation SWOT - Key Findings

OPPORTUNITIES

1) Uniform, unique, logic structure2) Continuity (15 years)3) User-friendly (Industry & Consumer)4) Good base for developing statistics (BW)5) Public available online in 7 languages6) Certain flexibility within the limit of the 6-

digits7) Covers the majority of the product groups

required in Europe8) Simplifying the transfer to own internal coding

concept

1) Key user group is Europe2) The 6-digits code has its limitation (international

implementation)3) Certain activities missing4) Certain European key players (retailers) missing5) Gender only available for textile and some other limited

product groups6) Not category driven7) Activities “Multisport” and “Leisure” basket for a lot of

products8) Organisation too weak – few members9) Awareness: Executive Management and users10) No key advantages for supplier/brands

1) Would suite most retailers (large potential)2) Extend the content of the exiting code by using

all options3) Get WFSGI on board4) If an extended code is developed then make

sure it covers all need internationally, for specialised shops and adding category.

5) Extend the concept adding codes not yet standardised

6) Integrate report functionality 7) Involved ERP providers

1) Other upcoming standards lunched by global (online) retailers

2) Lack of interest3) Too high cost of change4) Transfer (-time)5) Chaos and now uniformity - end of FEDAS PCK

THREATS

WEAKNESSESSTRENGTH

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation Next Steps

1) Feedback from participants of this meeting

2) Report and presentation will be distributed to rest of the task3) F2F (face to face) meeting with the workgroup (MRT, UHN, ANL,..)

Proposal to the Steering Committee

4) Result to be presented to the Steering Committee in September (9.9.2015)

5) Steering Committee to decide on the next activities

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation

Futsal (Select Sport DK)

Indoor soccer (for details please consult the enclosed brochure).

It seems that for the time being no special equipment exists

(must be confirmed), but if this activities is needed, it would be

sufficient to allocate it to an own main  group under the activity

88 “Various games & sports”.

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation

Service: New Product Type (IDE)

FSOFEDAS Standardisation Organisation Netball (Mizuno)

New product Main Group “Netball” under Activity 88 “Various games” andallocate the single products in the product sub group.e.g.1.88.40 = Hardware. Various games. Netball1.88.40.3= Balls1.88.40.9 = Accessories                3.88.40 = Footwear. Various games. Netball                3.88.40.1. = Netball shoes 

 

•Adapt the title of the activity “Various Games” to “Various Games & Sports”.