Format: Conversational Interruptions: Encouraged Conclusions: Speculative Goal: Dialogue and...
-
Upload
dennis-fitzgerald -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Format: Conversational Interruptions: Encouraged Conclusions: Speculative Goal: Dialogue and...
Format: ConversationalInterruptions: EncouragedConclusions: SpeculativeGoal: Dialogue and Community
1
Assertion: Formerly separate domains of lecture capture technologies and the emerging options for publicly sharing lectures on Web 2.0 consumer platforms are destined for convergence.
This development will raise important questions related to policy, control, and governance.
2
Outline:•Brief Overview of the Lecture Capture Imperative•The Current Lecture Capture Publishing and Distribution Model•The Proliferation of Institutionally Sponsored Open Lecture Sites•Lecture Capture + YouTube / iTunes•What’s Next? Professors Go it Alone•Some Questions About Instructors Using Lecture Capture Software to Publish On Their Own to Consumer Media Platforms•Questions and Discussion
3
Lecture Capture:The New Imperative
-Students Demand-Faculty Want-Evidence for Learning-Distance Education-Etc. etc. etc.
n=162http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=10752
5
-Proprietary Player
-Behind Authentication
-High Fidelity
-Many View Options
-Search
-Closed Captioning?
13
Advantages of Traditional Model & LMS Publication:
-Copyright Protections under TEACH Act
-No need to secure permissions for clips, videos, charts etc.
- Retain control of intellectual property.
14
Lecture Capture and LMS Integration:
-Captured Lectures Published Directly to LMS
-Lectures Only Available to Class Members
-Authentication
15
Courses in Consumer the Space: YouTube/EDU
-Dedicated Higher Ed Channels
- Content loaded by Institutions
-Often duplicates content on institution servers
18
Courses in Consumer the Space: iTunesU
-Authenticated and Open Models
- Tight Coupling with Application (iTunes) and Devices (iSlate etc.)
-Automatic Syncing
19
Institutional Managed Course Content on YouTube:
-Cheap publishing / storage platform
- Wide distribution and use
-Low fidelity / high convenience
20
Higher Ed. YouTube/EDU
-Not only courses
-Not only education
- Presentations
-Speeches
-Marketing
21
High Fidelity iTunesU
-Huge and growing public academic libraries
-High quality experiences
- Viable solution for both enrolled (paying students) and lifelong learners.
-Superior to on campus solutions?
22
-Instructors create their own channels
-Content not institutionally controlled
-Professors use lecture capture software to record own classes without technical support
27
-Instructors publish on their own – without permission (or even institutional awareness)
-Bypass Central IT
-Content now lives in the Cloud: who owns, supports, maintains?
28
Some Questions About Instructors Using Lecture
Capture Software to Publish On Their Own to Consumer
Media Platforms
30
Will only lectures by the institution’s most erudite scholars and dynamic professors be shared, or will the published lectures be more inclusive?
31
If a faculty member wants her lectures posted on iTunes U or YouTube EDU (and the lecture capture software supports this with automatic or one-button uploading), will a policy be necessary to support or thwart these postings?
33
How does the posting of lectures on iTunes U or YouTube EDU impact the competitive advantage of the institution?
35
What will result if the policy of our institution differs from that of peer or competing institutions?
36