Form No. 4 ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL ...aftlko.up.nic.in/C1 Daily Order/C1 Order...

Form No. 4

{See rule 11(1)} ORDER SHEET

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No.1

M.A.No.489 of 2019 with M.A.No.490 of 2019

Inre O.A.No. 33 of 2011

Ex Gnr (Opr) Santosh Kumar Singh Yadav Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for Applicant

Versus

Chief of Army Staff & others Respondents

By Legal Practitioner for Respondents

Notes of the Registry

Orders of the Tribunal

21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Shri Bhanu Pratap Kushwaha, learned counsel for the

applicant and Shri DK Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A.No.489 of 2019 with M.A.No.490 of 2019

In this case, O.A. No.33 of 2011 was dismissed vide order dated

01.02.2017. Thereafter the applicant’s first Review Application was also

rejected on 01.03.2017. Against the said order of rejection dated

01.03.2017, the applicant preferred LTA before the Hon’ble Apex Court with

DY No.33310 of 2017 and the Hon’ble Apex Court after condoning the

delay, rejected the LTA and also dismissed the appeal. Even after rejection

of the LTA by the Hon’ble Apex Court, second Review Application was

moved by the applicant which was rejected by this Tribunal on 01.04.2019.

Since the applicant moved repeated Review Application without any

substance, therefore, the Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs.10,000/- on the

review applicant and exemption application was also rejected by the

Tribunal.

We fail to understand as to why learned counsel for the applicant has

taken such steps when the case of the applicant stands finalized by the

Hon’ble Apex Court. Moving of such applications without any substance

amounts to abuse of process of court and also wastage of precious time of

the Tribunal. Therefore, we are compelled to dismiss the application for

Leave to Appeal with cost of Rs.15,000/-, which shall be paid within one

month from today and if the same is not paid, the same shall be recovered

as arrears of land revenue. Cost so recovered shall be transmitted to the

Bar Association, AFT, Lucknow for enrichment of the library.

(Air Marshal BBP Sinha) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) PKG

Form No. 4



Court No.1

Ex.A.No.6 of 2019 Inre O.A.No. 290 of 2016

Ex Sep Harendra Vikram Singh Applicant


Versus

Union of India & others Respondents




21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri VPS Vats, learned counsel for the respondents.

Ex.A.No.6 of 2019

This is an application for execution of the order dated 18.01.2018

passed in O.A.No.290 of 2016.

On behalf of the applicant, it is submitted that the applicant is getting

salary but that is reduced salary.

On behalf of the respondents, it is submitted that at the time of

discharge, the applicant was receiving terminal benefits and the same is

being deducted from the salary of the applicant. It is also submitted that the

payment of back wages amounting to Rs.5,03,945/-, which has been

awarded to the applicant @ 30% of the salary, shall be paid to the applicant

within six weeks.

List this case on 02.08.2019 for orders.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A.No.82 of 2017 with M.A.Nos.1443 & 1444 of 2018

Inre O.A.No. Nil of 2017

Sukhvinder Singh Kandari & Ex Sub Gauri Singh Applicant

Applicants in Person

Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) None is present on behalf of the applicant.

Present: Ms Appoli Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.

There is a resolution of the Bar Association that no adverse order

may be passed due to Bara Mangal.

Accordingly, the case is passed over for the day.



Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A.No.2132 of 2017 Inre O.A.No. Nil of 2017

Parmeshwari Dayal Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Shri Beer Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri RC Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents.






Form No. 4



Court No.1


Uday Bahadur Singh Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Col BP Singh (Retd), learned counsel for the applicant and

Ms Appoli Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two

weeks’ time to file medical documents in support of the application for

condonation of delay in filing the O.A.



Form No. 4



Court No.1


Ugrasen Pandey Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) None appears for the applicant.

Present: Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, learned counsel for the respondents.






Form No. 4



Court No.1


Kripa Shankar Sinha Applicant


Versus

Union of India & others (Air Force) Respondents





Present: Shri Mohd Zafar Khan, learned counsel for the respondents.






Form No. 4



Court No.1


Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Lootan Jha Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A.No.1567 of 2018

This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the O.A.,

which, as per office report, is delayed by more than eight years.

Objection and reply to objection have already been exchanged.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the O.A.

is hereby condoned.

By means of this O.A, the applicant has prayed for grant of

pensionary benefits to the rank of Hony Naib Subedar, which is a recurring

cause of action.

Admit.

Let the case be registered as O.A.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four

weeks’ time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed

within two weeks thereafter.

List this case on 16.07.2019 for exchange of pleadings before the

Registrar Court.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A.No. 1576 of 2018 Inre O.A.No. Nil of 2018

Ex Sigmn Bimal Kumar Singh Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Shri Amit Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shir Shiv Kant

Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Namit Sharma, learned

counsel for the respondents.

M.A.No.1576 of 2018

By means of this O.A., the applicant has challenged the discharge

order dated 22nd February 2018.

As per office report, there is a delay of 12 days in filing the O.A.

Objection to the application has already been filed by the

respondents.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the O.A.

is hereby condoned.

By means of this O.A, the applicant has prayed for grant of service

pension, which is a recurring cause of action.

Admit.

Let the case be registered as O.A.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four

weeks’ time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed

within two weeks thereafter.

List this case on 22.07.2019 for exchange of pleadings before the

Registrar Court.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A.No. 1923 of 2018 with M.A.No. 1924 of 2018


Smt Asha Devi (Wife of Late Hav Krishna Pratap Singh) Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for the respondents.






Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A.No. 1925 of 2018 with M.A.No. 1926 of 2018


Ex Rect Azaz Noor Khan Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents.






Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A.No. 1989 of 2018 Inre O.A.No. Nil of 2018

Ex Sep Laxman Singh Applicant


Versus






Present: Dr Shailendra Sharma Atal, learned counsel for the

respondents.

In compliance of our last order, copy of the mercy petition has not

been filed by the applicant.

Since, there is a resolution of the Bar Association that no adverse

order may be passed due to Bara Mangal, hence the case is passed over

for the day.



Form No. 4



Court No.1

Ex.A. No. 67 of 2018 Inre : T.A. No. 573 of 2010

Satyendra Prasad Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner

Versus

Chief of Army Staff & Others Respondents




21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha, Member (A)

Present: Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Dr.

Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

In compliance of order dated 07.05.2019 passed by this Tribunal a copy

of P.P.O. has been provided to the Ld. Counsel for the applicant, who after perusal

submitted that it is only a draft P.P.O.

Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for one day time to clarify the

same.


(Air Marshal B.B.P. Sinha) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) AKD/UKT/-

Form No. 4



Court No.1

Ex.A. No. 234 of 2018 with M.A. No. 381 of 2019 Inre : O.A. No. 248 of 2015

Smt. Malti Devi Wife of Hav. (Late) Deo Lakhan Prasad Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant

Versus

Union of India & Others Respondents





Present: Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant

and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 381 of 2019

This is an application for recall of order dated 26.03.2019 passed by this

Tribunal by means of which a cost of Rs.50,000/- was imposed on the

respondents. Ld. Counsel for the respondents further submitted that a copy of

Government Sanction when received, was forwarded to PCDA (P), Allahabad,

hence, the respondents submission to Tribunal earlier was to that extent correct

and their intention was not to mislead the Tribunal.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant fairly conceded that the Government

Sanction is different thing and the forwarding the claim of the applicant to the

PCDA (P), Allahabad is different.

Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that both the submission made

are correct and there is no apparent contradiction between the two submissions,

as both the things Government Sanction and Claim are independent of each other.

The Government Sanction is the formal approval while the claim in respect of the

aforesaid is to be forwarded by the Record Office after receipt of Government

Sanction to PCDA (P), Allahabad.

In view of aforesaid the Misc. Application No. 381 of 2019 filed by the

respondents for recalling the order dated 26.03.2019 is allowed. The order dated

26.03.2019 so for as the imposing the cost of Rs.50,000/- is concerned is recalled

and cost is waived off.

List this case on 25.07.2019 for filing compliance report failing which

respondents shall have to pay cost of Rs.20,000/-.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A. No. 336 of 2019 with M.A. No. 337 of 2019 Inre : O.A. No. 243 of 2012

Smt. Raj Bala Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

None is present on behalf of the applicant.

Since, there is a resolution of AFT Bar Association for not to pass adverse

order due to Bara Mangal, hence, the case is adjourned.



Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 444 of 2017

Smt. Puja Devi Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Major Atul Gupta, OIC Legal Cell for the respondents.




Perusal of record shows that the pleadings are complete and the case is

ripe for hearing.

List this case on 05.08.2019 for hearing.

On the date fixed Ld. Counsel for the respondents shall produce the

original documents pertaining to the case for perusal of the Bench.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 622 of 2017

Prithvi Pal Applicant


Versus






Case called out.





Perusal of record shows that the pleadings are complete and the case is

ripe for hearing.





Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 97 of 2018

Peskar Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.


Perusal of record shows that the amendment has also not been carried

out.




In the meantime amendment may be incorporated by the Ld. Counsel

for the applicant.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 156 of 2018

Brajesh Kumar Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.


As per the report of the Registrar Court pleadings are complete and the

case is ripe for hearing.







Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 182 of 2018

Nk. Girraj Singh Tomar Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.


Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for further time to deposit the

cost in compliance of order dated 26.04.2019.

The Counter Affidavit filed by the Ld. Counsel for the respondents shall

be taken on record after depositing the cost as the payment of cost was a

condition precedent to right to file the Counter Affidavit.





Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 463 of 2018

Smt. Sepawali Ale Applicant


Versus






Case called out.



Counter Affidavit filed by the Ld. Counsel for the respondents is taken

on record.




In the meantime Rejoinder Affidavit may be filed by the Ld. Counsel for

the applicant.




Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 262 of 2017

Sub. Sanjay Kumar Kushwaha Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of

the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Ld. Counsel for the

respondents when the case is listed next.

Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and

Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for adjournment. Accordingly, the

case is adjourned.

List this case on 03.07.2019 for further hearing.




Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 141 of 2012

Smt. Rekha Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 36 of 2017 along with O.A. No. 101 of 2017

Venugopal P. Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.


Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the original record

pertaining to the case is available with him.







Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 90 of 2017

Smt. Anju Rani Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 101 of 2017 along with O.A. No. 36 of 2017

Amit Kumar Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 258 of 2017

Akil Ahmed Ansari Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 91 of 2018

Maneesh Kumar Applicant


Versus






Present: The applicant Shri Maneesh Kumar in person and Mohd. Zafar

Khan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

The applicant prays for adjournment on the ground of non-availability of

his Counsel. Accordingly, the case is adjourned.





Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 220 of 2018

Jagvir Singh Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri R. Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh

Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant prays for time to produce certain case law

in support of his case.





Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 434 of 2018

Smt. Vimlesh Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 38 of 2019

Ex. Hav. Jagar Nath Singh Yadav Applicant


Versus






Case called out.

Present: Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.








Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. No. 171 of 2019

Ex. Nk. Shit Basant Yadav Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri G.S.

Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that he does not intend to file

Rejoinder Affidavit, hence, arguments were heard.

Order is reserved.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

O.A. (A) No. 39 of 2017 with M.A. No. 1237 of 2018

Smt. Sunita Singh W/o Abhishek Kumar Singh (In Custody) Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant

Versus






Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant and

Dr. Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that today the original records

have been received by him. He prays for time to go through it.


Ld. Counsel for the respondents is directed to retain the original records

till the next date of listing of the case.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

T.A. No. 35 of 2013

Hira Singh Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner

Versus






Case called out.

Present: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents.

On 15.04.2019 we had adjourned the case with the condition that no

further adjournment shall be granted. But today Ld. Counsel for the applicant is

not present.



List this case on 01.08.2019 for hearing with the conditions that no

further adjournment shall be granted.




Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A. No. 504 of 2019 Inre O.A. No. Nil of 2019

Ex Sgt Ram Chandra Yadav Applicant


Versus

Union of India & Others (Air Force) Respondents




21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A)

Memo of appearance filed by Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate on behalf of

respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as learned counsel for the


Present: Shri Rang Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and

Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 504 of 2019

This is an application for condonation of delay filed by the applicant for

grant of disability pension. As per office report, it is delayed by more than 7 years

in filing the Original Application.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks’

time to file objection on the application for condonation of delay. Replication, if

any, may be filed by the learned counsel for the applicant within two weeks’

thereafter.

List this case on 18.07.2019 for orders before Registrar Court.

(Air Marshal BBP Sinha) (Justice S.V.S. Rathore) Member (A) Member (J) SB

Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A. No. 491 of 2019 with M.A. No. 492 of 2019 Inre O.A. No. 297 of 2011

Union of India & Others Applicants-respondents


Versus

Ex Sub Kedar Prasad Mishra Respondent-applicant





Present: Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the applicants-respondents

and Col Rakesh Johri (Retd), learned counsel for the respondent-applicant.

M.A. No. 491 of 2019

This is an application for condonation of delay in moving the application

under section 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007 for grant of leave to

appeal against the judgment and order dated 09.08.2018, passed by this Court in

O.A. No. 297 of 2011, which is delayed by 07 months & 29 days in filing the

application for leave to appeal.

M.A. No. 492 of 2019

This application for leave to appeal has been filed by the applicants-

respondents after expiry of the period of limitation. Learned counsel for the

applicants-respondents has only argued that this application for leave to appeal is

barred by time and no question of law of general public importance involved could

be brought to our notice during the course of arguments.

Accordingly, application for leave to appeal is rejected on the ground of

delay as well as on merits.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A. No. 495 of 2019 Inre O.A. No. 550 of 2017

Smt Kalash Kumari Applicant


Versus






Present: Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and

Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 495 of 2019

This is an application for recall of order dated 27.04.2019 by means of

which O.A. No. 550 of 2017 was dismissed for want of prosecution.

The grounds shown in the affidavit filed in support of the recall application

seem to be sufficient.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the order dated 27.04.2019 is

hereby recalled, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- to be deposited in AFT

Bar Association, Lucknow within a week from today.

Subject to deposit of cost, the case shall be restored to its original number.



Form No. 4



Court No.1

M.A. No. 502 of 2019 Inre O.A. No. 2 of 2017 with M.A. No. 612 of 2017 Inre M.A. No. 1769 of

2017 with O.A. No. 254 of 2016

Ex Sub Maj Rashid Ali Applicant


Versus






Memo of appearance filed by Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate on behalf of

respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as learned counsel for the


Present: Shri Yashpal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri

Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents.

M.A. No. 502 of 2019

This is an application for recall of order dated 26.04.2019 by means of

which O.A. No. 2 of 2017 was dismissed for want of prosecution.

The grounds shown in the affidavit filed in support of the recall application

seem to be sufficient.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the order dated 26.04.2019 is

hereby recalled, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- to be deposited in AFT

Bar Association, Lucknow within a week from today.

Subject to deposit of cost, the case shall be restored to its original number.



Form No. 4



Court No.1

Ex. A. No. 21 of 2018 Inre T.A. No. 48 of 2011

Taj Mohd Sheikh Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for Petitioner

Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: The petitioner in person and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, learned

counsel for the respondents.

Ex. A. No. 21 of 2018

This is an application for execution of the order dated 06.07.2017 passed in

T.A. No. 48 of 2011.

The petitioner present in person submits that amount of approx 41 lakhs

has been received by him and thus order under execution has been complied

with.

Since the order under execution has been complied with, therefore, this

execution application has rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed.

The petitioner may move an application before this Tribunal, in case he has

any grievance against the order of compliance.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

Ex. A. No. 88 of 2018 with M.A. No. 1526 of 2018 Inre O.A. No. 258 of 2016

Smt Asha Singh Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents.

Ex. A. No. 88 of 2018


O.A. No. 258 of 2016.

In this case, PPO has been issued to the applicant. Learned counsel for the

applicant submits that this execution application may be disposed of with the

directions to the bank concerned to ensure payment in terms of the PPO at the

earliest.

Accordingly, this execution application is dismissed.


Form No. 4



Court No.1

Ex. A. No. 95 of 2018 Inre O.A. No. 143 of 2015

Shaikh Ibrahim Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: None for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for

the respondents.

Ex. A. No. 95 of 2018


O.A. No. 143 of 2015.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks

further time to file compliance report. He further submits that total cost imposed

earlier shall be deposited in the Registry by the date fixed which shall be paid to

the applicant through cheque.



Form No. 4



Court No.1

Ex. A. No. 200 of 2018 Inre O.A. No. 585 of 2017

Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Ranjeet Singh Negi Applicant


Versus





21.05.2019 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.V.S. Rathore, Member (J) Hon’ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member (A) Present: Shri R. Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun

Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for the respondents.

Ex. A. No. 200 of 2018


O.A. No. 585 of 2017.

It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that PPO has been issued to

the applicant and order has been complied with but interest component on the

delayed payment has not been paid to the applicant.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks

further time to ensure payment of amount of interest to the applicant and to file

compliance report.



Form No. 4 ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL ...aftlko.up.nic.in/C1 Daily Order/C1 Order...

Documents

Transcript of Form No. 4 ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL ...aftlko.up.nic.in/C1 Daily Order/C1 Order...