Force of Nature -- David Suzuki -- 2009 09 27 -- The Troublesome David Suzuki Foundation -- Update...

8/8/2019 Force of Nature -- David Suzuki -- 2009 09 27 -- The Troublesome David Suzuki Foundation -- Update -- MODIFIED -

1/25


2/25

2277//0099//22000099

David Suzuki Foundation.

Here are TW O interesting statements from DAVIDSUZUKIFOUN-DATION.

The Ontario law [ prohibition of pest con-trol products ] is something the David Su-zuki Foundation, along with a range ofhealth and environmental organizations,has been pushing for. March 17 th, 2009.

The Suzuki Foundation challenges otherprovinces to meet or beat Ontario s banon cosmetic pesticides to ensure a highstandard of protection for human healthand the environment across the country. March 4 th, 2009

DAVID SUZUKIFOUNDATION claims to be a national, nonprofit,environmental organization. It uses POLITICIZED SCIENCE and edu-cation to promote solutions that conserve nature and help achievesustainability within a generation.


3/25

2277//0099//22000099

DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION has developed expertise in the dis-tribution of ideas related to POLITICIZED SCIENCE and public policyconcerning the environment. It eloquently claims that ...

The David Suzuki Foundation worksthrough science and education to protectthe diversity of nature and our quality oflife, now and for the future.

Suzuki operates across Canada and the United States, but its business headquarters, with overFIFTY EMPLOYEES, is located inVancouver. It operates with a budget of oversix mill ion dollars peryear. Suzuki is arguably the largestMULTIMILLION DOLLAR MONEYMAKING MACHINE within the ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT. It hasbranch offices in Ottawa and Montreal. DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATIONwas cofounded in 1991 by broadcaster and scientistDavid Takayo-shi Suzuki.

DAVIDSUZUKIFOUNDATIONhas had some famous (or infamous)Honourary Board Members, such as ...

Margaret Atwood, the writer.

James Burke. Paul Ehrlich, the environmentalist.

Gordon Lightfoot, the singer.

Sting. (Yes, that Sting !)


4/25

2277//0099//22000099

[] the oceans will die of DDT poi-

soning by 1979 [] the U.S. life

expectancy will drop to 42 years by

1980 due to cancer epidemics. A

lighthearted and needlessly

alarming 1969 warning from PaulR. Ehrlich, now a Suzuki Board

Member.

Suzuki funding.

DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION is a nonprofit IN -DEPENDENT charity that DOES NOT accept govern-ment grants. It claims to be funded by more thanfortythousand donors from around the world (in-cluding eighteenthousand in Ontario), as well asover fifty corporations and foundations. Donors

and contributors have included the following ...


5/25

2277//0099//22000099

Suzuki donors and contributors.

BANK OFMONTREAL . BMOEMPLOYEECHARITABLEFOUNDATION.. BCBUDDHISTCHURCHFEDERATION. BELL CANADA. CANADIANASSOCIATION OFPHYSICIANS FOR THEENVIRONMENT(C.A.P.E.). CANONCANADA INC.. CONGREGATION OFNOTREDAME. DOMTARINC.. I.B.M. CANADA LTD.. MCGRAWHIL L RYERSON.

PATRICK ANDBARBARA KEENANFOUNDATION. Over1,000,000 dol lars. PFIZERCANADA INC.. POWERCORPORATION OFCANADA. Over1,000,000 dollars. ROCKEFELLERBROTHERSFUND. 1,085,000 dollars (19982001 ). SCOTIA CAPITAL. SISTERS OFCHARITY OF THEIMMACULATECONCEPTION. STEPHENR. BRONFMANFOUNDATION. Over1,000,000 dollars. THE BENNETTFAMILYFOUNDATION. THE DAVID ANDLUCILEPACKARDFOUNDATION. 837,100 dollars (19992001 ).

THE J.W. MCCONNELL FAMILYFOUNDATION. THE LEFEBVREFAMILYFOUNDATION. Over1,000,000 dollars. THE MCLEAN FOUNDATION. 20,000 dollars(2007 ). THE SANTA BARBARA FAMILYFOUNDATION. TOYOTA. WARNERBROTHERSENTERTAINMENTCANADA INC..

It may be said that there is NO conflictofinterest between thefunding of Suzuki and its activities pertaining to the conspiracy to

prohibit pest control product. Suzuki s foundation accepts NOmoney from government, unlike the majority of the ENVIRONMENTALMOVEMENT. However, there MA Y be a huge conflictofinterest be-tween being a supposedly neutral television personality working fora governmentowned public broadcasting corporation, and operat-ing a partisan militant environmental organization.


6/25

2277//0099//22000099

Suzuki and golf.

DAVIDSUZUKIFOUNDATION obviously activelysupports the prohibition of pest control products.Furthermore, it has also publicly stated that itDOES NOT want any Ontario prohibition excep-tions for the GOLF INDUSTRY.

David Suzuki himself has said the following in 2008 ... (the un-derlined emphasis is our own).

[ The new prohibition legislation in On-tario ] allows golf courses to continue us-ing pesticides and gives power to the On-tario minister of the environment to allowother exceptions, a potentially dangerous

loophole.

On its web site, DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION has also made thefollowing statement about golf exceptions on October 15 t h, 2008.

If provincial prohibitions exempt golfcourses, as proposed in the discussionpaper, municipalities need clear authority

to restrict pesticide use on golf courseswithin their boundaries to better protectpublic health and the environment.


7/25

2277//0099//22000099

Suzuki,

The Puppet Master of theEnvironmental Movement.

Suzuki has definitely taken a LEADERSHIP role among thosegroups in the ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT. It appears that some-times Suzuki even acts as THE PUPPET MASTER of the ENVIRON-MENTAL MOVEMENT. Suzuki has manyPUPPETS, since it is CLOSELY

ALLIED with several groups that actively support the Ontario prohibi-tion. Sometimes, Suzuki simply pulls THE STRINGS, and makes theseguys PERFORM. Its actuallyFUN to watch. Here are THE PUPPETS(allies) ofTHE PUPPETMASTER.


8/25

2277//0099//22000099

The Suzuki PUPPETS.

CANADIANASSOCIATION OFPHYSICIANS FOR THEENVIRONMENT (C.A.P.E.). CANADIANCANCERSOCIETY(C.C.S.). CANADIANENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION(C.E.L.A.). CANADIANUNION OFPOSTAL WORKERS (C.U.P.W.). ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE. QUITERRE(Suzukis Quebec ambassador and public policy SHIELD). GREENPEACE. PESTICIDEFREE ONTARIO(P.F.O.). POLLUTIONPROBE. REGISTEREDNURSESASSOCIATION OFONTARIO(R.N.A.O.). SIERRA CLUB OFCANADA. THE ONTARIOCOLLEGE OFFAMILYPHYSICIANS (O.C.F.P.).

WORLDWILDLIFEFUND OFCANADA (W.W.F.).

DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION has forged aVERY CLOSE ALLIANCEwith CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT(C.A.P.E.), and both appear to mutually fund each others projects.

Suzuki shield organizations.ENVIRONMENTAL SHIELD ORGANIZATIONS (also called umbrella

groups or front organizations) are often used by the ENVIRONMENTALMOVEMENT. SHIELDS are set up and controlled by a parent group, orseveral parent groups. They can act for the parent group withoutthe actions being attributed to the parent group.


9/25

2277//0099//22000099

ENVIRONMENTAL SHIELDS are set up for one or several of the following rea-

sons.

For collecting or donating funds. For concealing the views of supposedly moderate professionals, such as

physicians and health care workers, in an attempt to mask their extremist

views.

For ensuring that the nonprofit tax status of the parent groups is notjeopardized by their activities.

For giving everyone the impression that the ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENThas

considerable size and power, when in fact, it does not. For giving the public the impression that there is GRASSROOTSsupport for

changes in public policy.

For protecting the parent groups from legal liability.

On the matter of conspiring to prohibit pest control products, Suzuki hasbeen involved with at least two SHIELD organizations in two different provinces.

Suzukis public affairsSHIELD organization in Ontario is COALITION FOR

PESTICIDEREFORMONTARIO. This coalition was created to ensure the passageof the Ontario COSMETICPESTICIDESBAN ACT.

Here is a sample of the coalitions advertising on April 26 t h , 2008 that wassupported by Suzuki.

Lawns and gardens are closer to wheremost people l ive and where children play.Lawn and garden pesticides represent a po-tentially significant and often involuntary

pathway of exposure.

Another Suzuki SHIELD isQUITERRE. It is VERY CLOSELY associated withDAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION. It acts an ambassador and publ ic pol icySHIELDorganization forDAVIDSUZUKIFOUNDATION in Quebec.


10/25

2277//0099//22000099

Suzuki in Quebec.

As conspiracies to prohibit pest control products rampage across Can-ada, the one bright spot is Quebec, where a prohibition, in existence since2006, is now being challenged by a manufacturer. DOW AGROSCIENCES, theproud owner of the hated herbicide 2,4Dhas declared that it has had enough,and is invoking its rights as a company that manufactures a product that has

been given a clean bill of health byHEALTHCANADA. Dow argues that the fed-eral government owes mill ions of dollars in lost revenues for a product that

was prohibited needlessly. Dows case is based upon CHAPTER 11 of theNORTHAMERICA FREE TRADEAGREEMENT(N.F.T.A.).

Here is whatDOW AGROSCIENCES had to say in a media release on Oc-tober 24 t h, 2008.

The actions of the Government of Quebec aretantamount to a blanket ban based on nonscientif ic criteria. [ ... ] The PMRA [ PestManagement Regulatory Agency of HealthCanada ] concluded that 2,4D can be usedsafely according to label directions for a vari-ety of lawn, turf and agricultural applications,and that the product meets all of Canadaspesticide health and safety regulations, whichare among the toughest and most stringent inthe world.

The N.A.F.T.A. Chapter 11 scenario has the ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT,and Suzuki in particular, extremely worried. This scenario has dogged themovement for years for other hated products, such as CHLORDANE, DDT, andLINDANE.


11/25

2277//0099//22000099

If this scenario plays out in its entirety, the Canadian federal government

may ultimately be forced to dispense hundreds of mil l ions of dollars for everypest control product prohibited in every province and municipality across Can-ada. THE PUPPET MASTER himself, along with those minion organizations thathave conspired to prohibit pest control products, may also be liable for hugesums of money. This scenario is mind boggling to people such as David Su-zuki, who has created the SUZUKI ALLIANCE with other members of the ENVI- RONMENTAL MOVEMENT, and who has retained the services of lawyers concern-ing the matter in an effort to pressure the federal government to avert this ju-risdictional catastrophe.

Here is a statement from the Suzuki lawyer on March 24 t h , 2009.

We cannot allow U.S. businesses to hand-cuff provinces from applying the precaution-ary principle when it comes to protectingresidents from potentially cancercausingchemicals. If the NAFTA challenge pro-ceeds, we will seek to intervene and submitthe viewpoint of environmental groups.

Everyone knows that the GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC and the CanadianFederal Government are both in a bind over the issue of 2,4D. The federalPEST MANAGEMENT REGULATORY AGENCY ofHEALTH CANADA has recently de-termined that2,4Dmeets Canadas strict health and safety standards, and assuch is acceptable for continued registration in Canada.

In 2009, the SUZUKI ALLIANCE was formed with seven environmentalgroups to challenge the threat against the Quebec prohibition of pest control

products. The head of this alliance is THE PUPPET MASTER himself and hisfoundation, David Suzuki. The ALLIANCE was set up to pool expertise and toincrease public awareness regarding the threat to the ENVIRONMENTAL MOVE-MENT. This alliance is also designed to give everyone the impression that theENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT has considerable size and power against thisthreat, when in fact, it does not.


12/25

2277//0099//22000099

The SEVEN following organizations are calling upon the GOVERNMENT OFCANADA to vigorously defend Quebecs prohibition on pest control products. These groups oppose the DOW AGROSCIENCES lawful challenge of Quebecsprohibition under the NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (N.A.F.T.A.)Chapter 11. They also want federal government to acknowledge that it makessense to eliminate unnecessary chemical exposure to allegedly PROTECT hu-man health and the environment. Here are the members of the SUZUKI ALLI- ANCE.

CANADIANENVIRONMENTAL LAW ASSOCIATION(C.E.L.A.).

DAVIDSUZUKI FOUNDATION.

ECOJUSTICECANADA.

QUITERRE( Suzukis ambassador in the Province of Quebec).

NEW DEMOCRATICPARTY OFCANADA (the third federal opposition party).

SIERRA CLUB OFCANADA

UNIVERSITY OF

OTTAWA

ECOJUSTICE

ENVIRONMENTAL

LAW

CLINIC

(U.O.E.E.L.C.

In fact, only THREE groups are supporting this cause since the othergroups are a redundant repetition of another, using the same people under adifferent group name. C.E.L.A., Ecojustice, and Suzuki.

Ecojustice and U.O.E.E.L.C. In 2007, ECOJUSTICE CANADA part-nered with UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA to establish the first interdisciplinary clinic of its kind in Canada. The result was the creation of a

SHIELDtandem organization called UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWAECOJUSTICEENVIRONMENTAL LAW CLINIC (U.O.E.E.L.C.). Ecojustice andU.O.E.E.L.C. are basically oneinthesame group.


13/25

2277//0099//22000099

Ecojustice, N.D.P., and quiterre. In 2001, when the prohibition ofthe TOWN OFHUDSON was being challenged before THE SUPREME COURTOF CANADA , ECOJUSTICE CANADA provided legal counsel for the FEDERA- TION OFCANADIANMUNICIPALITIES (managed by some of the same peoplethat now run NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF CANADA (N.D.P.)), NATUREACTION QUEBEC (an early version of QUITERRE) and WORLD WILDLIFEFUND (W.W.F.). Ecojustice, N.D.P., and quiterre are basically oneinthesame group.

Suzuki and quiterre. In 19921993, QUITERREwas established asan ambassador and public policySHIELD organization forDAVID SUZUKIFOUNDATION in the PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. Suzuki and quiterre arebasically oneinthesame group.

Sierra and U.O.E.E.L.C. Will Amos. This fellow works for two or-ganizations. Board Member and Secretary. SIERRA CLUB OF CANADA.

Also Staff Lawyer. UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWAECOJUSTICE ENVIRON-

MENTAL LAW CLINIC (U.O.E.E.L.C.). Sierra and U.O.E.E.L.C. are basi-cally oneinthesame group.

N.D.P., Suzuki, Ecojustice, Sierra. Jack Layton. Leader. NEWDEMOCRATIC PARTY OF CANADA (N.D.P.). The third federal oppositionparty. Before his days with the N.D.P., Mister Layton was leader of theFEDERATION OF CANADIAN MUNICIPALITIES, a group that was grantedintervener status before THE SUPREME COURT OFCANADA, which upheldthe bylaw enacted by the TOWN OFHUDSON. The goal of this federation

was to support the prohibition on COSMETIC PESTICIDES. N.D.P., Su-zuki, Ecojustice, Sierra and all are basically oneinthesamegroup.


14/25

2277//0099//22000099


15/25

2277//0099//22000099

Suzuki in British Columbia.

In the PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (B.C.), David Suzuki, is leadingthe charge against pest control products. He has allied himself with TOXICFREE CANADA, CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY (C.C.S.), and others. Despite thefact that a provincial prohibition now appears possible, it is quite clear mostmajor municipalities throughout B.C. will have enacted their own prohibitionsagainstCOSMETIC PESTICIDES by2010 or2011, especially since the UNION OFB.C. MUNICIPALITIES gave its seal of approval in September 2008.

As ofApril 2009, the following municipalities have enacted, or promisedto enact, a prohibition. Burnaby. Comox. Courtenay. Cumberland. Es-

quimalt. Gibsons. Invermere (comes into effectMay 2009). Kelowna. MapleRidge. Nelson. New Westminster (comes into effectMarch 2010). North Van-couver. Port Moody. Salmon Arm (comes into effect March 2010). Sechelt. Vancouver. Victoria. West Vancouver. Whistler.

In 2009, INTEGRATEDENVIRONMENTALPLANT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OFWESTERN CANADA (I.E.P.M.A.), in conjunc-tion with its membership, reacted in aVERYdecisive manner regarding the conspiracy toprohibit legal, safe, and irreplaceable pest

control products in British Columbia.

INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL PLANTMANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OF WESTERNCANADA correctly recognized that this is thelast chance to prevent a senseless, needless,and malicious prohibition, and save theGreen Space Industry and its future.

I.E.P.M.A. has undertaken a provincewide petition in order to show thegovernment that British ColumbiaDOES NOT require a prohibition on pest con-trol products that are already federally legal, scientifically safe, and totally irre-placeable.

I.E.P.M.A. can be reached at 2505788383 [email protected]

I.E.P.M.A. web site is http://www.iepma.ca


16/25

2277//0099//22000099

Suzukis apparent hypocrisy.

HERES YOUR WEEKLY SCIENCE MATTERS COLUMN byDavid Suzuki withFaisal Moola. March 27 t h, 2009.

Nows the time to take science seriously

How can any society make important decisions about

these issues without being scientifically l i terate and in-formed ?

Too often, the role of science in solving our social, medi-cal, and economic problems is poorly understood be-cause the nature of scientific research, discovery, andapplication is not understood.

[ ... ] good scientists make important discoveries, and to

maintain a top group of scientists, we need a culture thatsupports and honours its researchers. That cant happenwhen science funding becomes a political hockey puckslapped around by whichever party comes into power.We need generous longterm support for our top scien-tists so that they can create clusters of enthusiastic, in-spired researchers.

Evidently, Suzuki supports scientists WHEN IT SUITS HIM. He evidentlyDOES NOT SUPPORT those scientists working for PEST MANAGEMENT REGULA-TORYAGENCYofHEALTHCANADA (P.M.R.A.). How can any society make impor-tant decisions about pest control products without the scientifically literate andinformed P.M.R.A. ? In fact, Suzuki himself has NO expertise whatsoever inmatters relating to pest control products.


17/25

2277//0099//22000099

Suzuki culprits.

The following people at Suzuki are the culprits that can be held account-able for conspiring to prohibit legal, safe, and irreplaceable pest control prod-ucts across Canada. They are responsible for the COSMETIC PESTICIDESBANACT being legislated by the GOVERNMENT OFONTARIO. Nobody associated withthis foundation appears to have any expertise in pest control products or turf &ornamental maintenance.

[email protected]

David Suzuki.

[email protected]

Here are Suzuki s personal credentials with groups thatconspire to prohibit pest control products.

Chairman and CoFounder ofDAVIDSUZUKIFOUNDA-

TION.

Honorary Board Member atECOJUSTICECANADA.

Honorary Board Member atENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE.

Suzuki holds a B.A. Honours in Biology and a Ph.D. in Zoology. He is therecipient of countless awards and honorary degrees from around the world. Heis a true Canadian hero. Nonetheless, he has no credentials in matters involv-ing pest control products and turf maintenance. He resides in the Kitsilanoarea of Vancouver, British Columbia.

Lisa Gue.

[email protected]

Lisa Gue. Environmental Health Policy Analyst. Re-searcher and writer. DAVIDSUZUKIFOUNDATION. She appearsto have no practical background concerning pest control prod-ucts. Resides in Ottawa.


18/25


19/25

2277//0099//22000099

I 'm not only a scientist, Im also a mother.Science will never tell us what really hap-pened, but this is somebody who possiblyfell on the wrong side of your riskbenefitanalysis. This is a picture of my son. Hedied just over a year ago, of a malignancythat was possibly caused ... When I waspregnant with him, they constructed a golfcourse just down the road from me. Theyused a vast quantity of pesticides when theywere doing that.

Here are Sears personal credentials with organizations that conspire toprohibit pest control products.

Active Member and Representative. CANADIANCOALITION FORHEALTHAND THEENVIRONMENT (C.C.H.E.).

Adjunct Investigator or Health Researcher atCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OFEASTERNONTARIO(C.H.E.O.), Research Institute, Ottawa.

Head of Steering Committee forTHE COALITION FOR A HEALTHYOTTAWA(C.H.O.).

Representative forORGANICLANDSCAPEALLIANCE (O.L.A.). Researcher and writer forDAVIDSUZUKIFOUNDATION. Scientific or science advisor forTHE COALITION FOR A HEALTHYOTTAWA

(C.H.O.).

Spokesperson forHEALTHDANGERS OF THEURBANUSE OFPESTICIDES.

Peter Robinson.

Chief Executive Officer. DAVIDSUZUKIFOUNDATION.

[email protected]


20/25

2277//0099//22000099

hank you for taking Canada one step closerto being pesticidefree.

Quote from

David Suzuki Foundation

T


21/25

2277//0099//22000099

CANADA ONE STEP CLOSER

TO BEING PESTICIDEFREE

Click on your province below to tell your Premier that you want strong protec-tions against the health risks of lawn and garden pesticides.

British Columbia Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba

Ontario Quebec New Brunswick Nova Scotia

Newfoundland Nunavut Prince Edward Island Yukon Territory

Northwest Territory

Thank you for taking Canada one step closer to bei ng pesticidefree.


22/25

2277//0099//22000099

WEED OUT PESTICIDES !

Keeping unnecessary lawn and garden pesticides

off store shelves is the best way to stop their use.

That's why the David Suzuki Foundation is work-

ing to ban both their sale and use in provincesacross Canada.

With Ontario and Quebec banning unnecessary lawn and garden

pesticides, and New Brunswick considering similar action, there is

great promise for similar bans across the country.


23/25

2277//0099//22000099

Ontario

This week, a ban on lawn and garden pesticides was finalized by the

government of Ontario. Starting this spring, 295 pesticides will be

banned in Canada's most populous province, benefiting both hu-

man health and the environment through reduced use and expo-

sure.

Yes we can, eh ? !

This would never have happened without thousands of others like

you, who used the David Suzuki Foundation website to tell gov-ernment officials the places we live, work and play should be free of

needless chemical pesticides. Your collective effort strengthened

the ban, even while the chemical lobby threatened to weaken it.

You actions go beyond making Ontario the second province in Can-

ada to ban lawn and garden pesticides. Now is the time to grab this

momentum to ban pesticides in other provinces.

Provincial Pesticide Bans Work !

Quebec is currently the only province to restrict cosmetic pesticide

sales (the Ontario ban will not be in place until 2009). Statistics

Canada found that the number of households using pesticides in

Quebec decreased by 50% between 1994 and 2005. Nationwide,

pesticide use dipped by only 2 percentage points over the same pe-

riod.


24/25

2277//0099//22000099


25/25

2277//0099//22000099

FORCE OFNATUREwas launched for continuous transmission on the Internet on January 1st, 2009. It is a series of enewsletters destined for the GREEN SPACE INDUSTRY, the ENVIRONMENTAL TERROR MOVEMENT, politicians, municipalities,and the media, nationwide across Canada, and parts of the United States and overseas. FORCE OF NATURE is pro-duced in two parts. First. The MEDIA REPORT itself that reports on the current events affecting the future of theGREEN SPACE INDUSTRY. Second. INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE,which is a running commentary, sometimes technical innature. Force of Nature is the WHOLE TRUTH from an INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE !

FORCE OF NATURE is the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his entourage. Norah G is ac-tually an acronym for the stable of writers that contribute to this enewsletter. The opinionsexpressed in Force of Nature, even though from an INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE, may not reflectthose of everyone in the GREEN SPACE INDUSTRY, or Mr. Gathercoles many associates. Be

warned ! Mr. Gathercole and Norah G may sometimes be very irreverent and fearless withthese enewsletters. DONT THANK US. ITS A PUBLIC SERVICE. AND WE ARE GLAD TO DO IT .

William H. Gathercole holds a degree in Horticulture from the UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH, and another pure and applied

science degree from MCGILL UNIVERSITY. He has worked in virtually all aspects of the GREEN SPACE INDUSTRY, includingpublic affairs, personal safety, and environmental issues. Mr. Gathercole has been a consultant and instructor fordecades. He also been an agricultural agronomist. Mr. Gathercole has been following the evolution ofENVIRON-MENTAL TERRORISM for over a quartercentury. His involvement in environmental issues reached a fevered pitch inthe 1990s, when he orchestrated, with others, legal action against unethical and excessive municipal regulationsrestricting the use of pest control products. ( i.e. the Town of Hudson. ) Although he can be accused of being ANTIENVIRONMENTMOVEMENT, he is, in fact, simply a strong advocate FOR the GREEN SPACE INDUSTRY. However, this posi-tion has not precluded him from criticizing the Green Space Industry itself. Nonetheless, his vast knowledge of ourlong journey with environmental issues is UNDENIABLE. ( Hopefully ! ) For many years, Mr. Gathercole has been acontributing columnist forTURF&RECREATION Magazine, Canadas Turf and Grounds Maintenance Authority.

All document excerpts and pictures contained in FORCE OF NATURE were found somewhere on the Internet. We be-lieve that they are in the public domain, serving one of the following purposes : archive, education, promotion, pub-licity, or press release.

We believe that environmental terrorism can be BEATEN ! Information presented in FORCE OF NATURE has been devel-

oped for the education and entertainment of the reader. The events, characters, companies, and organizations, de-picted in this document are not always fictitious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, may not be coin-cidental. The mission of Force of Nature is to respond to those statements and activities originating from culpritsthat conspire to prohibit FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE conventional pest controlproducts. Culprits are identified on the basis of their statements, activities, affiliations, and whereabouts. Eventhough each culprit is a misguided adversary, each still deserves our respect. The term culprit is not an accu-sation of any legal wrongdoing. Force of Nature is simply holding culprits accountable for changes in public policythat have terrorized the Green Space Industry. Force of Nature believes that the prohibition policies of the ENVIRON-MENTAL TERROR MOVEMENT will lead to UNEMPLOYMENT, BANKRUPTCY, BUSINESS FAILURE, DESPAIR, and DESTITUTION. The ac-tions of the movement is viewed as a form ofTERROR against the Green Space Industry.

The following titles are currently available. (Or, will be available in the near future.) Alberta Prohibition British Columbia Prohibition Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment Canadian Environ-mental Law Association Consequences David Suzuki Foundation DDT and Politicized Science Deathand the Environmental terror movement Golf and Landscape Trade Industries June Irwin, The Clown of JunkScience Kazimiera Jean Cottam Kelowna B.C. Prohibition New Brunswick Prohibition Nova Scotia Pro-hibition Ontario Prohibition Organic Fertilizers Pets and Lawn Care Chemicals Prince Edward Island

Prohibition Quebec Prohibition Rachel Carson, The Queen of Junk Science Randy Hillier, The Next Premierof Ontario Salmon Arm B.C. Prohibition The 9/11 Era of the Green Space Industry The Failure of Inte-grated Pest Management The Industry Strikes Back The Misconceptions About Cancer The Wisdom ofDrysdale The Wisdom of Holland The Wisdom of the Solomons Wisconsin Fertilizer Prohibition ASK FOR ACOPY OF ANY BACK ISSUE OF FORCE OF NATURE TODAY. READ ALL ABOUT ENVIROMANIACS AND THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL TERROR ORGANIZATIONS IN FORCE OF NATURE ! THE WHOLE TRUTH FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE!

Force of Nature -- David Suzuki -- 2009 09 27 -- The Troublesome David Suzuki Foundation -- Update...

Documents

Transcript of Force of Nature -- David Suzuki -- 2009 09 27 -- The Troublesome David Suzuki Foundation -- Update...