Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019...

44
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019...

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

1n)

SEP 1 7 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PARV ; :

NYS SUPREME CG . • •

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XWALTER E. POTOCKI, Index No: 190032/2012

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. hereby requests Summary

Judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims defendant, GARDNER DENVER, INC. are

F I L E Ddismissed with prejudice and without costs.

/Vc/K I j SEP 23 2019

UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE/NB/VYORK

Dated: 2019New York, New York

5qT fcAnrk 3. fogNBERG, PC

Andre\jt-WTueanVEsq.SEGAL McGAMBRIDGEStfNGER &JIAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for defendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

Adam DufcsfiWEITZ & L*Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C .

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

waited L

p H P vU Q ILTJ V^7 L r.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION fA;r i .

NYS SUPitBii n . - . Yr <.r. Y

XThis Document Relates To:

JOSEPH ZAHRA Index No.: 190015-2012

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Rov aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. C I I 1^Dated: New York, New York SEP 23 M

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICEYORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

RECEIVEDAUG 2 2 2019

WS SUWEME COURT - CIVIL__ TRIAL SUPPORTSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 1148 3 Z

ANGELO SCAGNELLI UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.,

F I L E Dare dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkAugust / i f i . 2019 SEP 23 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SP1TZER, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsAngelo Scagnelli14 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005(212) 267-3091

Erin N. Miter, Esq.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsSid Harvey Industries, Inc.80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ

j.s.c.66-0043U

( N0896691-1}

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XSEP 1 7 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

X PART J.NYS SUPREME COURT • C « ViL

ANN PEARLSTEIN, as Administratrix for the Estateof JAMES PEARLSTEIN, and ANN PEARLSTEIN,Individually,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J. Mendez)

Plaintiff(s), Index No.: 190027/11-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

ALFA LAVAL INC., et al„

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissedF I L E Dwith prejudice and without costs.

Mo//? SEP 23 2019Dated:New York, New York

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEK NEW YORK

Clw’fstopher A. Romanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Tara L|. Pehush, Esq.K&t GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJS.C.303694350 v1

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

Hy

SEP 1 7 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

FV. P.7 13NYS SUPPBiE COURT - CIVIL

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITYABESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

XThis document Relates to:ANN PEARLSTEIN, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No.: 190027/11JAMES PEARLSTEIN and ANN PEARLSTEIN,Individually,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGEMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Plaintiff(s),

- against -ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.;

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER- BROOKS, INC request summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross claims against CLEAVER- BROOKS, INC. with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendants CLEAVER- BROOKS,

F I L E DINC. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.SEP 23 2019DATED: New York, New York71 , 2019

COUNJY'CLERK'S OFFICEN X NEW YORK

CHri/Romanelli, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg P.C700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Halbardier, Esq.Attorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore LLC101 Greenwich Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

Suz;

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

. i

SEP 1 7 2Q 19SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK p - ;vr 13

NYS su°r;3; i.: courr - CIVILXNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYABESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document Relates to:ANN PEARLSTEIN, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No.: 190027/11JAMES PEARLSTEIN and ANN PEARLSTEIN,Individually,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGEMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Plaintiffs),

- against -ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.;

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendants TWIN DISC INC. request summary judgment in the above-

entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross claims against TWIN DISC INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendants TWIN DISC INC. are

F I L E Ddismissed with prejudice and without costs.

SEP 23 2019DATEDyNew Ycrk, New York, 2019

UNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Halbardier, Esq.Attorneys for TWIN DISC INC.Barry McTieman & Moore LLC101 Greenwich Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

Chris Romanelli, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg P.C700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

uz

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

-•=1ri_i

SEP 1 7 20)9SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITYi /Vf:

NVS SUPREME CNYCALI.A.S.(J. Mendez)

XPart'~T-3-~

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

X

This Document Relates to:SEAN WILBUR, Individually and as

Administrator of the Estate ofHERBERT W. WILBUR,

Index No.: 190389/10

Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

- against -ASBEKA INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK, INC.,individually and as successor to

Asbeka Asbestos Corp., et al.,

Defendants.X

INC. ,defendant, . DAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK,WHEREFORE,

s/h/a DAV CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section §3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant DAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK, INC., with prejudice, and

after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition; it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant

iJmJ^s w prejudiceDAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK, INC. ar

and without costs.SEP 23 2019

Dated: New York, New York

^ft4- 2019 COUNTYCL K’S OFFIC0S’

S' s sjS

cfJoseph M. Angiolillo, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantDavid Fabricators of NY, Inc.44 Wall Street, 14New York, New YorkOur File No.: 11279/75

Arthur G. Prystowsky, .Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for PlaintiffEstate of Herbert W. Wilbur14 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005

thSuite 6B Floor10005

SO ORDERED:

Hon. Manuel Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

kPrQ) ^ 0 L

SEP 1 7 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART i3NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL

—xThis Document Relates To:

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDERON BEHALF OF FORDMOTOR COMPANY

BARBARA BURNHAM, as Proposed Executrixof the Estate of WILLIAM EDWARDBURNHAM and DOROTHY I. BURNHAM,Individually,

Plaintiffs), Index No.: 190487/2011

-against-A.O.SMITH CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendant(s). —x

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and cross-claims against defendant FORD MOTORCOMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claim and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTORCOMPANY be and the same as^ hereby dismissed with prejuf^Sajd ^thoi^os^^SEP 23 2019

/ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE- /NEMLYORKBy: Nancy L. Pennie, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970

Dated: NewYorlc, New Yoamlrnioyfi A

Af i.

By: BELLUCK546 Fifth AvenijNew York, NeuCounsel for:Pilifhtiffs

FJMELPw" Floorbrk 10036

SO ORDERED:>N. MANUEL J. MENDEZMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.655112M

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

I—T r-! if • riruL ! .i !!M

SEP 1 7 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Pari 13(Mendez, J .)

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONWARD A. REYNOLDS and CAROLREYNOLDS,

Index No.: 190276/2011Plaintiffs,

- against - UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and after notice to all

co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Aurora Pump Company are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

jb vys'l 5*

Dated : , 2019New York, New York

' ^ l.IL.i

Sarah R. Haag-Fisk.SEGAL MeCAMBKIDGE N

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG , P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

FILEDTAXSO ORDERED,Manuel J . Mendez. J .S.C.

SEP 23 2019

COUNTY CLERK'SNEWYORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .

OFFICE

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

P i p f fLi U irr.3 v:

: I—! •

n : j L.JSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

LL-”i U

SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

PART .13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

Index No.: 110349-2004WILLIAM RYAN,

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

V'° / / 1

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

F I L E DSO ORDERED,

SEP 23 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyer$

r_)r—r~

rtlE^ iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

i

LT ~j ; j Ln

X SEP 1 7 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

This Document Relates To:

WALTER PORTER and MARGARET PORTER, Index No.: 101524-1994

Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.C. & S., INC., formerly ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING AND SUPPLY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York SEP 2 3 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Kevin M. Berry, Esq. 'WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

» >

UnitediavtyQfSIF3 If

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019

XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

DIETER ENGELHARDT, Index No.: 190064-2008

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

SEP 2 3 2019

C9UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

^ NEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

'I

fto’edr awyenT

: rv' ' lAJsIHsleiL^,

; ;SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

V. •

X SEP 1 7 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

XThis Document Relates To:

BARRY GERENSTEIN, Index No.: 101909/2007

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defgfltfaitf Milto^RoiMredismissed without prejudice and without costs. I I »"

SEP 2 3 2019Dated: New York, New York

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEEW YORK

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

t United Lawyefs

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r~::-

X•. /NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION SEP 17 2019X IPART 13This Document Relates To: Pi COURT CIVIL

KEVIN MCDONALD, Index No.: 117938-2006

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. p I IDated: New York, New York SEP 23 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYORK

7Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyei$

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

P- C-, r--- V " -. i7-~ H fr7

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)SEP 1 7 2019In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

P/.RT 13NYS SUP.'£.--i = COURT - CIVILX

This Document Relates To:

WAYNE R. SMITH, Index No.: 118275-2006

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against dedismissed without prejudice and without costs.

SEP 23 2019Dated: New York, New York

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEMEW YORK

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

Kevin M. Berry, EsqWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ s.c

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

Uiuiea Lawyers' j

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

|P)

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)SEP 1 7 2019In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

This Document Relates To:

ROBERT S. KNAPP III, Index No.: 190121-2009

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

SEP 23 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

^̂ JJEWYORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

unitedLawyers

aSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

jL i r r j V

SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 1 j

NYS SUPREME COURT - CfVIlX

This Document Relates To:

CHARLES F. LAURIA, Index No.: 117937-2006

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York SEP * 3 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

“i.Li- Lb:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019

XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

PART 13NYS SU-KT :CO’ ' T - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

HENRY J. LINES, Index No.: 116956/2007

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

SEP 23 2019

OUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

A*Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

b‘<V .UucttG^UnitedLawyers

'6) [ -- (p'- i _^ li- fj

. ! •.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xSEP 1 7 2019NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONPART 13

NYS SUPRSS*= COURT - CIVILX

This Document Relates To:

FRANK GIACCONE and URSULA GIACCONE, Index No.: 116090/2006

Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -CLARK-RELIANCE CORPORATION, et al

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

' /t o l l 9 SEP 2 3 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEt NEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

iu *

&8iteaiawysrsp) pif u."' U ' ;. : .Vs.* i 'r

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019

XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

CHARLES JOHN MOCERA, Index No.: 101713-2007

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Rgy «•&

dismissed without prejudice and without costs. I-|!** *» ***

SEP 23 im

COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK

Dated: New York, New York

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

\ **

6d^WJ... 5

[REG ’ • > : !SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 Z019X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)P,-iR7 j. 3In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SL’PRHN'i COJYT

XThis Document Relates To:

JOSEPH L. PULEO, Index No.: 108261-2007

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendadismissed without prejudice and without costs.

SEP »S 2013

CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Dated: New York, New York

COUNTY

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

r f\SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

©fi (fU U - -V

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

SEP 1 7 2019X

i > -\TV;NYS SUPl‘:r; - - f ; </>NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

v ;

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

JAMES NYARADY, Index No.: 103070-2007

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defenddismissed without prejudice and without costs.

p|.lt£ Rg apSEP 23 2019Dated: New York, New York

1 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE„ NEW YORKcA&

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

UnitedLawyers

Q) n=u aSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

JAMES EASON, Index No.: 110350-2004

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendismissed without prejudice and without costs.

cfftTv

SEP 28 2019Dated: New York, New York

1 1 0 1 1 1 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION p ' p — J

NYSsuFr.F '- i co'yvr - CIVIL

xThis Document Relates To:

ROBERT D’ULISSE, Index No.: 110351-2004

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

SEP 23 2019

©UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

^ NEW YORK

9

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J . Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

GilS

— •,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019

XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)NYS SUP;-;' rr.‘.In Re; NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION J

xThis Document Relates To:

LAWRENCE CAVALLO, Index No.: 190122-2009

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

ihk SEP 2 3 20191

NEW YORK

?C AKevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

UnitedLawyers

—- / -Si[ (IniSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)PIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPRES CO

XThis Document Relates To:

MARGARET J. BLUNDA, Executrix of the Estate ofVITO FRANCIS BLUNDA,

Index No.: 190385-2009

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

AND ORDER- against -

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Miltondismissed without prejudice and without costs. I-|

SEP * 3 2019

OUNTY CLERKSOFFICENEW YORK

Dated: New York, New York

% jdn

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S . r

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

/i fSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x SEP 1 7 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION iPART I J

NYS SUPREf-i C O'J Z" cnX

This Document Relates To:

WILLIAM LOUGHLIN, Index No.: 115660-2005

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -GENERAL ELECRIC COMPANY, et al.

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendantdismissed without prejudice and without costs. n L E D

SEP 2 8 2019Dated: New York, New York

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

D) -SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART , •

NYS SUPn-T" c:.X

This Document Relates To:

LOUIS LATUDA, Index No.: 190063-2008

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defenddismissed without prejudice and without costs. ip" N|ilt(|^R ai|^

SEP 2 8 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Dated: New York, New York

ll^Jn

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lavvyeis

r5) r-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)PART LIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPREME: CO'jrr - CfVlL

XThis Document Relates To:

MARGARET STEIN, as Executrix of the Estate ofFREDERICK STEIN,

Index No.: 115680-2006

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

AND ORDER- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. 'FI L E nDated: New York, New York

SEP * 8 2913

UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE** NEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

r\̂SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENtiEZJ .S.C.

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

irLir

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019

XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)

PART 13NYS SUPREME COU.- T CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

STEPHEN ZBORAY, Index No.: 109669-2005

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Mihon fray ML

dismissed without prejudice and without costs. | I V*

SEP * 3 7019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Dated: New York, New York

3/^A

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J, MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

IS) ; !

UHiiSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)NYS SUPREME COU .r:'

• - jIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

ROBERT HOPE, Index No.: 190250/2011

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. V?|^Dated: New York, New York

$E? * 3 2019

TY CLERK'S OFFICE

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

Kevin M. Berry, EsqWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

1SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)PAicr i ?,

MVS SUFI'S' - COURT - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

EDWARD J. GALETTI, Index No.: 190292-2011

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.O. SMITH COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendantdismissed without prejudice and without costs. nrenDated: New York, New York SEP 23 2019q j i 0 l l 7

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq. IWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

/ NSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

United Lawyers

f ]SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x SEP 17 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION P-'- R- iNys SUPfcjr ii C J :: ,

XThis Document Relates To:

JOHN REGAN, Index No.: 190169/2011

Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. f l 1. E DDated: New York, New York

SEP w 3 Z0J8

*NTY CLiRK'i OFFICEYORK

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005

Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005

/—\SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

/VJGM £ F=U£bSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X NYCAL• I .A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to: Index No: 103797/1999

WERNER R. and MARIE ULRICH UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

X

WHEREFORE, defendant REYNOLDS METAL COMPANY, requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 321*2, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against REYNOLDS METAL COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant REYNOLDS METAL

F I L E DCOMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.* , <

Dated : / 7 i • i . 2019 SEP i S 2019

iOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

New YdrL New York

i/... -"S i >• ,. < /

S. Howarth, Esquire1th D. Babula, Esquire

WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, Reynolds Metal Company

JI .aura Green, EsquireWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs

r^pr̂ -\/7p[FSO ORDERED,MANUEL J . MENDEZ, J .S.C.

SEP 0 3 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

Ki “."D- V

SEP 11 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PAP. : i. ;NYS SUPREME • •

• CIVILNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Index No.: 120392/2001NORMAN FREDDIE GABEL and ELIZABETHGABEL,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),

- against -A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE Defendant A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY (“A. O.

SMITH”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against

Defendant A. O. SMITH with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant A. Q. SMITH are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White Plains, New York

, 2019

dL

Qn&Uti b d f O l O , Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 286-6442 F I L E DSO ORDERED, SEP 23 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez{S0101437.1}

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S.C .

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

1rz:.“v. /7!IrtiE^Eu v L±i

SEP 11 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CiVILNYCAL ^I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 120392/01104094/02

NORMAN FREDDIE GABEL and ELIZABETH GABEL, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant

NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne ew York2019

John J. Fa.CullenAttorney forNATIONAL GRI44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000

Andrew J. Gayoso, Esq.WEITZ Sc LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

ng,/issq.nd/Dykmzm LLP

defendantD GENERATION LLC

FILEDSO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

SEP *8mMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

Du

SEP 11 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 112732/00

ROBERT O'NEILL and LORRAINE O'NEILL, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant

NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York% , £> 2019

SETEsq.Charles Ferguson,

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

John J. Fanning, Esq.Cullen and'2)ykman LLPAttorney for DefendantNATIONAL GlRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StlreetNew York, NY--(212)732-2000

0005

FILEDSEP is M'9ZY\SO ORDERED,

RK’S OFFICEMANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

COUNTEWVORK

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

D 5c !U:a V

SEP 11 2019 i:

PART 13 |NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL jSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORKNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 103433/01119381/00

ROBERT S. MARTILLO, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant

NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkR. Si . 2019

tr~, EsTJ. John J. F

Cullen an^Dykmarf LLPAttorney ffor DefendantNATIONAL/GRID44 Wall Gtre^New Yorky-NY(212)732-2000

ing, JEsq.Charles Ferguson,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.

C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

INERATION LLC

10005

F I L E DSEP 23

«wnSg^0Fn“SO ORDERED,

MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

SEP 11 2019PART 13

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 105972/00121985/99

MARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), requests summary judgment in the above-entitledaction, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and

after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant

NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

Charles Ferguson,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

John J.Cullen /

AttorneNATION[H44 Wall'New York, NY 10005(212)732-2000

anning, Esq.d Dykjnan LLPfor defendantGRJD GENERATION LLCfsreet

s®.

FILEDSO ORDERED,

SEP 2 3 2019

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

SEP 11 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

This Document Relates to: Index No.:190099/2009

ROBERT J. PECORARO, as Executor for theEstate of DOLORES PECORARO, andROBERT J. PECORARO, Individually,

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a

NATIONAL GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION

LLC f/k/a LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant

NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New f,J New York2019

David A. LIThe FerrariAttorneys(/Brickell y600 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3800Miami, Florida 33131(305)375-0111

inzer, Esq./iaw Firmor Plaintiffsrid Plaza

John /J. Fanning, \Esq.Cullen andr Dykman LLPAttorney /for DefendantNATIONAL/GRID44 Wall Etree,

New York^NY(212)732-2000

NERATION LLC

10005

F I L E DZ^\MANUEL'J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

SO ORDERED, SEP 23 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

®ECSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

SEP 11 2019IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

I- TV j 3NYS SUPP-BT: COURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates To:

Index No.: 108518/2002SALVATORE CAMMARATA and ANTOINETTECAMMARATA,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

- against -

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), etal.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE Defendant A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY (“A. O.

SMITH”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against

Defendant TACO INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant A. O. SMITH are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White Plains, New York

, 2019

Erik Jacobs, Esq. CAttorney for PlaintiffsjWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 286-6442

F I L E DSEP 28 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

{S0101437.1}

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

. '

3•

SEP 11 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART iNYS SUPREME COURT TH-IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL L

I.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J. Mendez)This Document Relates To:

Index No.: 190005/2011DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN, JR., asExecutor of the Estate of ROBINBISHOP ALLEN, deceased, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS

COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant A.O. SMITH WATER

PRODUCTS COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without cost.

Dated: White Plains, New York

a , 2018

Laura B. HollmaryfesjfAttorney for DefmytantA.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

BELLUCEK BdfDX, LLPAttorneysfar Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.

SEP 2 3 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

{V0560720.1}

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019  · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019 part 13 supreme court of the state of new york nys supreme court-civil county of new

!{

* SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

/ jf J

V 'TV

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

; NYCAL! I.A.S. Part 13• (Mendez, J.)

SEP 11 2019T- r i:

NYS SUPRL- !- :;ouThis Document Relates to: CIVIL

Index No.: 190451/2011RONALD N. RUBIN and RONNI RUBIN UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

§ 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint and cross-claims against Defendant A.O. SMITH

WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER

PRODUCTS COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK

t f i ,2019

Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Nicholas W. Maiorano, Esq.Attorney for DefendantECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Ste. 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

SEP 23 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

{S0102675.1}