Fluids Lecture 14

download Fluids Lecture 14

of 17

Transcript of Fluids Lecture 14

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    1/17

    1

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued)

    So far we have talked about internal flows

    ideal flows (Poiseuille flow in a tube)

    real flows (turbulent flow in a tube)

    Strategy for handling real flows: Dimensional analysis and data

    correlations

    How did we arrive at correlations? non-Dimensionalize ideal flow; use to

    guide expts on similar non-ideal

    flows; take data; develop empirical

    correlations from dataWhat do we do with the correlations? use in MEB; calculate pressure-drop

    flow-rate relations

    Empirical data correlations

    friction factor (P) versus Re (Q) in a pipe

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    4000Re4.0Relog0.41

    turbulent

    10Re4000Re079.0turbulent

    2100Re

    Re

    16laminar

    10

    525.0

    =

    =

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    2/17

    2

    rough pipes - need an additional dimensionless group

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued)

    k- characteristic size of the surface roughness

    D

    k- relative roughness (dimensionless roughness)

    28.2Re

    67.4log0.4

    110 +

    +=

    fD

    k

    f

    Colebrook correlation (Re>4000)

    Otherinternal flows:

    k

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Drawn tubing (brass,lead, glass, etc.) 1.5x10-3

    Commercial steel or wrought iron 0.05

    Asphalted cast iron 0.12

    Galvanized iron 0.15

    Cast iron 0.46

    Wood stave 0.2-.9

    Concrete 0.3-3

    Riveted steel 0.9-9

    Material k(mm)

    from Denn, Process Fluid Mechanics,

    Prentice-Hall 1980; p46

    Surface Roughness for Various

    Materials

    Real Flows (continued)

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    3/17

    3

    ( ) HHRD 4

    perimeterwetted

    )areasectionalcross(4=

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Empirically, it is found that f vs. Re correlations for circular

    conduits matches the data for noncircular conduits if D is

    replaced with equivalent hydraulic diameter DH.

    Hydraulic radiusEquivalent hydraulic

    diameter

    Real Flows (continued)

    flow through noncircular conduits

    Otherinternal flows:

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Flow Through Noncircular Conduits

    from Denn, Process Fluid Mechanics,

    Prentice-Hall 1980; p48

    f

    Re

    Flow through

    equilateral

    triangular

    conduit

    f and Re

    calculated

    with DH

    solid lines

    are forcircular pipes

    Note: for some shapes the correlation is

    somewhat different than the circular pipe

    correlation; see Perrys Handbook

    Real Flows (continued)

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    4/17

    4

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Non-Circular Cross-

    sections have application

    in the new field of

    microfluidics

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Chemical & Engineering News, 10 Sept2007, p14

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    5/17

    5

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued)

    entry flow in pipes

    flow through a contraction

    flow through an expansion

    flow through a Venturi meter

    flow through a butterfly valve

    etc.

    Otherinternal flows:

    see Perrys Handbook

    calculate drag - superficial velocity

    relations

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued)

    Now, we will talk about external flows

    ideal flows (flow around a sphere)

    real flows (turbulent flow around a sphere, other obstacles)

    Strategy for handling real flows: Dimensional analysis and data

    correlations

    How did we arrive at correlations? non-Dimensionalize ideal flow; use to

    guide expts on similar non-ideal

    flows; take data; develop empiricalcorrelations from data

    What do we do with the correlations?

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    6/17

    6

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    y

    z

    (r,,)

    flow

    g

    Steady flow of an

    incompressible, Newtonian

    fluid around a sphere

    Creeping Flow

    spherical coordinates

    symmetry in the dir

    calculate v and drag

    force on sphere

    neglect inertia

    upstream = vvz

    (equivalent to

    sphere falling

    through a liquid)

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Steady flow of an

    incompressible,Newtonian fluid around

    a sphere

    Creeping Flow

    r

    r

    v

    v

    v

    =0

    r

    g

    g

    g

    =0

    sin

    cos

    ),( rPP=

    gvPvvt

    v ++=

    +

    2

    steady

    state

    neglect

    inertia

    SOLVE

    BC1: no slip at sphere surface

    BC2: velocity goes to far from spherev

    Eqn of

    Motion:

    Eqn of

    Continuity:

    ( )0

    sin

    sin

    11 2

    2=

    +

    v

    rr

    vr

    r

    r

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    7/17

    7

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    SOLUTION: Creeping Flowaround a sphere

    cos2

    3cos

    2

    0

    =

    r

    R

    R

    vgrPP

    ( )T

    vv += all the stresses can be

    calculated from v

    r

    r

    R

    r

    Rv

    r

    R

    r

    Rv

    v

    +

    =

    0

    sin4

    1

    4

    31

    cos2

    1

    2

    31

    3

    3

    0

    Bird, Stewart, Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena,

    Wiley, 1960, p57; complete solution in Denn

    evaluate at the

    surface of the

    sphere

    ( )[ ] ==

    2

    0 0

    2 sin ddRIPrFRr

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    SOLUTION: Creeping Flow

    around a sphere

    What is the totalz-direction

    force on the sphere?

    total stressat a point in

    the fluid

    vector stress on a

    scopic surface ofunit normal r

    integrate over

    the entire

    sphere surface

    total vector

    force on

    sphere

    Fk=

    totalz-

    direction

    force on the

    sphere

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    8/17

    8

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Force on a sphere (creeping flow limit)

    ++== RvRvgRFFk z 423

    4 3

    buoyant

    force

    comes frompressure

    friction drag

    kinetic termsstationary terms

    (=0 when v=0)

    Stokes law:

    kinetic force = RvFkin 6

    comes from shearstresses

    form drag

    Bird, Stewart,

    Lightfoot,

    Transport

    Phenomena,

    Wiley, 1960, p59

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Steady flow of an

    incompressible,Newtonian fluid around

    a sphere

    TurbulentFlow

    **2******

    *

    * 1

    Re

    1g

    FrvPvv

    t

    v++=

    +

    Nondimensionalize eqns of change:

    Nondimensionalize eqn forFkin:

    define dimensionless

    kinetic force

    ==

    2

    2,

    2

    1

    4v

    D

    FCf kineticzD

    concludef=f(Re) or

    CD=CD(Re)

    drag

    coefficient

    take data, plot, develop correlations

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    9/17

    9

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Steady flow of an

    incompressible,

    Newtonian fluid arounda sphere

    TurbulentFlow( )

    Re

    24

    2

    1

    4

    6

    22

    =

    ==

    vD

    RvCf D

    take data, plot, develop correlations

    Laminar flow: Stokes law

    Turbulent flow: Calculate CD from terminal velocity of a falling sphere(see BSL p182; Denn p56)

    2

    sphere

    3

    4

    ==

    v

    DgCf D

    allmeasurable

    quantities

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Steady flow of an incompressible, Newtonian

    fluid around a sphere

    McCabe et al., Unit Ops of Chem

    Eng, 5th edition, p147

    Re

    24

    graphical correlation

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    10/17

    10

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Steady flow of an incompressible, Newtonian

    fluid around a sphere

    BSL, p194

    correlation equations

    000,200Re50044.0turbulent

    500Re2Re5.18turbulent

    10.0ReRe

    24laminar

    60.0

    =

    =

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    11/17

    11

    internalflows (flow in a conduit)

    externalflow (around obstacles)

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued)

    Now, weve done twoclasses of real flows:

    We can apply the techniques we have learned to

    more complex engineering flows.

    We will discuss two examples briefly:

    1. Flow through packed beds

    2. Fluidized beds

    ion exchange columns

    packed bed reactors

    packed distillation

    columns

    filtrationflow through soil

    (environmental issues,

    enhanced oil recovery)

    fluidized bed reactors

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Flow through Packed Beds

    voids

    voids

    solids

    solids

    solids

    =

    bedofsection-x

    solidareasectional-x1

    bedofsection-x

    voidsareasectional-x

    If the hydraulic diameter DH concept works for this flow, cross-

    section then we already knowf(Re) from pipe flow.

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    12/17

    12

    What is pressure-drop versus flow rate for flow through anunconsolidated bed of monodisperse spherical particles?

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued)

    More Complex Applications I: Flow through Packed Beds

    flowDp=sphere diameter

    or for irregular particles:

    v

    p

    a

    D 1

    particlesofareasurface

    particlesofvolume

    6=

    We will choose to model the flowresistance as flow through tortuous

    conduits with equivalent hydraulic

    diameterDH=4RH.

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) Flow through Packed Beds

    Hagen-Poiseuille equation:We will choose to model the flow

    resistance as flow through tortuous

    conduits with equivalent hydraulic

    diameterDH=4RH.( )

    L

    DPPv L

    32

    20 =

    average

    velocity in the

    interstitial

    regions

    bedentireofsection-x

    voidsofareasectional-x

    0

    Qv

    Qv

    =

    vvv =

    =

    bedofsection-x

    voidsareasectional-x0

    void

    fraction

    superficial

    velocity

    BUT, what areDHand average velocity

    in terms of things

    we know about the

    bed?

    0vv =

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    13/17

    13

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) Flow through Packed Beds

    ==surfacewettedtotal

    flowforavailablevolume

    4H

    H RD

    BUT, what isDHin terms of things we know about the bed?

    )1(6)1(

    bedofvolume

    surfacewettedbedofvolume

    voidsofvolume

    =

    =

    = p

    v

    D

    a

    from Denn, Process Fluid

    Mechanics, Prentice-Hall

    1980; p69

    bedofvolume

    particlesofvolume

    particlesofvolume

    surfaceparticle

    ( )

    =

    13

    2 pH

    DD

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) Flow through Packed Beds

    Now, put it all together . . .

    from Denn, Process Fluid

    Mechanics, Prentice-Hall

    1980; p69

    0vv = ( )

    =

    13

    2 pH

    DD

    ( )L

    DPPv L

    32

    20 =

    ( )

    =2

    0

    0

    2

    1 4

    1

    vD

    L

    PP

    f

    p

    L

    analogous toffor

    for pipes we write:

    ( )LPPD vfL

    p

    = 02

    02

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    14/17

    14

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) Flow through Packed Beds

    Now, put it all together . . .

    from Denn, Process Fluid

    Mechanics, Prentice-Hall

    1980; p692

    2200

    )1(36

    = p

    Dvfv

    )1(

    2

    72

    1)1(

    3

    0

    =

    f

    Dv p

    Now we follow

    convention and

    define this as 1/Rep

    and this as fp

    p

    p

    f721

    Re1 =

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) Flow through Packed Beds

    p

    p

    f72

    1

    Re

    1 =

    When we check this relationship with experimental data we find that a

    better fit can be obtained with,

    p

    p

    f=+ 75.1Re

    150

    Ergun Equation

    A data correlation for pressure-drop/flow rate data

    for flow through packed beds.

    from Denn, Process Fluid

    Mechanics, Prentice-Hall

    1980; p69

    )1(

    2

    )1(Re

    3

    0

    ff

    Dv

    p

    p

    p

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    15/17

    15

    pf

    pRe

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Flow through Packed Beds

    from Denn, Process Fluid Mechanics, Prentice-Hall 1980; p709;

    original source Ergun, Chem Eng. Progr., 48, 93 (1952).

    p

    p

    f=+ 75.1Re

    150

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) Flow through Packed Beds

    What did we do?

    We assumed the same functional form forPandQ as laminar pipe flow with,

    hydraulic diameter substituted for diameter

    hydraulic diameter expressed in measureables

    resulting functional form was fit to experimental data (new Re and f

    defined for this system)

    scaling was validated by the fit to the experimental data

    we have obtained a correlation that will allow us to do design

    calculations on packed beds

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    16/17

    16

    Can we use the Ergun equation (for pressure drop versus flow rate ina packed bed) to calculate the minimum superficial velocity at which

    a bed becomes fluidized?

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued)

    More Complex Applications II: Fluidized beds

    flow

    In a fluidized bed reactor, the flow

    rate of the gas is adjusted to

    overcome the force of gravity and

    fluidize a bed of particles; in this

    state heat and mass transfer is good

    due to the chaotic motion.

    v

    p

    p

    f=+ 75.1Re

    150The Pvs Qrelationship cancome from the Ergun

    eqn atsmallRep

    neglect

    Now we perform a force balance on the bed:

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) More Complex Applications II: Fluidized beds

    pressure

    (Ergun eqn)

    gravity

    buoyancy

    AP

    net effect of

    gravity and

    buoyancy is:

    ( )ALgp 1

    ( )AL1bed volume =

    When the forces

    balance,

    incipient

    fluidization

  • 7/27/2019 Fluids Lecture 14

    17/17

    17

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows (continued) More Complex Applications II: Fluidized beds

    ( )ALgAP p = 1

    When the forces balance, incipient fluidization

    p

    p

    f=Re

    150eliminate P;solve forv0

    ( )

    ( )

    =

    1150

    32

    0pp gD

    v velocity at the point of

    incipient fluidization

    Faith A. Morrison, Michigan Tech U.

    Real Flows SUMMARY

    internalflows (pipes, pumping)

    externalflow (packed beds, fluidized bed reactors)

    REAL

    ENGINEERINGUNIT OPERATIONS

    internalflows (Poiseuille flow in a pipe)

    externalflow (flow around a sphere)

    IDEAL

    FLOWS

    internalflows (f vs Re)

    externalflow (CD vs Re)

    REAL

    FLOWSnondimensionalization

    scopicbalances

    apply engineering approximations using reasonable

    concepts and correlations obtained from experiments.