Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

21
Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens Alabama Water Resources Association Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 07, 2012 Justin B. Mitchell APC Compliance Studies

description

Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens. Justin B. Mitchell APC Compliance Studies. Alabama Water Resources Association Conference Orange Beach, Alabama September 07, 2012. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Page 1: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly”

Traveling Water Screens

Alabama Water Resources Association ConferenceOrange Beach, Alabama

September 07, 2012

Justin B. MitchellAPC Compliance Studies

Page 2: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

IntroductionImpingement- The death of fish and aquatic organisms that are pinned on the cooling water intake structure (CWIS).

Page 3: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Impingement

Page 4: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Proposed Impingement Rule Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act

Withdraw >2 MGD from waters of the US >25% used for cooling purposes

Primary Compliance Options:1. Cooling Towers2. Intake velocity <0.5 fps3. Traveling Screen Modifications and Biological

Monitoring Fish Buckets Fish Return System 48 hr Mortality Limit Criteria:

Average annual mortality rate <12% Monthly maximum mortality rate <31%

Page 5: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Gorgas Steam Plant Walker County, AL Black Warrior River

(Mulberry Fork) 1,200 MW 5 generating units FGD (scrubber) 2 separate CWIS

Units 6-7 Units 8-10

Page 6: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Gorgas Approach

SSI Band Screen Retrofit Cost effective, $1.3M Operationally feasible Moribund fish (i.e. fish health) exceptions Entrapment Can this technology achieve the mortality

limits?

Page 7: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Modified Band Screen with Fish Buckets

Page 8: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Low and High Pressure Spray

Fish Trough

Debris Trough

Intake Flow

Page 9: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Fish Return and Aquaria System

Page 10: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Study Objectives1. Characterize Fish Impingement

Rates Debris trough Fish trough

2. Evaluate Screen Operational Efficiency

3. Investigate 48 hr Latent Impingement Mortality

4. Examine Rates of Sick or Moribund Fish

Page 11: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Impingement SamplesCollected to Date

Fish Return TroughDebris Trough

3 8-hr sample/day Day Evening Night

4 days/week (Jan-Feb) 2 days/biweek (Mar-Jun) Total Samples = 72 8-hr

samples/trough

Page 12: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Species Diversity 5,300 fish 30 species 11 families Recreationall

y Important spp.

Fragile spp.

Page 13: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Common Species

Page 14: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Shad & Non-shad Composition

80%

0.9%

8%11%

Page 15: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Fish Separation

87.6%

12.4%

92.5%

7.4%

Page 16: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Survivability Experimental Design

Biweekly ImpingementFish Return Trough only

Fish Collection2 days/week

48 Hourly Latent Impingement Mortality (LIM) Observations

Shift Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday

0600-1400Fish Collection & LIM Observations

Fish Collection & LIM Observations LIM Observations LIM Observations

1400-2200Fish Collection & LIM Observations

Fish Collection & LIM Observations LIM Observations LIM Observations

2200-0600Fish Collection & LIM Observations

Fish Collection & LIM Observations LIM Observations LIM Observations

Page 17: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Other Study Components Water Quality

Intake Aquaria system

CWIS Flow Circ Pumps On,

Unit offline Intake Velocity Weather and River

Flow conditions

Page 18: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

24 and 48 hrLatent Impingement

Mortality

Page 19: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Fish Health Diagnosis

Page 20: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Preliminary Conclusions Impingement comprised mostly of shad 24 hr and 48 hr Impingement Mortality

> 12% Limit Shad (89-100%) Non-shad (20-60%)

Disease prevalence among all survival categories

LIM studies are time and labor intensive Future Research: Explore ways to

optimize impingement survival

Page 21: Fish Impingement and Survival on “Fish Friendly” Traveling Water Screens

Questions?Justin Mitchell(205)664-6184

[email protected]