Final Thesis Figures

download Final Thesis Figures

of 17

Transcript of Final Thesis Figures

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    1/17

    Figure 2. Casa Grande: Site map of compounds.

    (General Information Regarding Casa Grande Ruin, Arizona. United States Department of the

    Interior. Washington: Government Printing Ofce, 1913. 16-17.)

    Figure 1. Casa Grande Ruins National Monument: Site photo. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    2/17

    Figure 3. Coronado State Monument: Site photo. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

    Figure 4. Dorgan House, Big Bend National Park: Site photo. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    3/17

    Figure 5. Dorgan House: 1950s after abandonment, prior to preservation work.

    (Castolon Historic District: Big Bend National Park, Texas. Division of Interpretation and Visitor Services,

    Big Bend National Park, Feb. 1997, 16).

    Figure 6. Dorgan House: Fallen mud plaster has piled up against the wall base.

    (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    4/17

    Figure 7. Fort Craig National Historic Site: Site photo. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

    Figure 8. Fort Davis National Historic Site: Site photo. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    5/17

    Figure 9. Fort Selden State Monument: Site photo. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

    Figure 10. Fort Selden: Trees planted on or near their historic locations to shield the historic

    walls from damage by windborne particles. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    6/17

    Figure 11. Fort Union National Monument: Site photo. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

    Figure 12. Fort Union: Photo of the Mechanics Corral, 1866. A typical example of the territorial

    style of adobe architecture used at the Fort.

    ( 5/20/07).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    7/17

    Figure 13. Paquim (Casas Grandes): Site photo. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

    Figure 14. Pecos National Historical Park: Site photo. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    8/17

    Figure 15. Tumacacori National Historical Park: Site photo. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

    Figure 16. Tumacacori: Marks caused by water damage visible on the interior of the church

    building. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    9/17

    Figure 17. Fort Selden: Walls constructed for the test wall project conducted on the site. (Photo

    by author, Jul. 2006).

    Figure 18. Paquim: Historic walls covered in multiple layers of new old adobe mud. The photo

    depicts deterioration of the protective earthen plaster. While the plaster should not be allowed to

    accumulate at the wall bases, the coating does not need to be reapplied immediately upon

    deterioration, as many layers must deteriorate before the historic material is reached.

    (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    10/17

    Figure 19. Example of the use of wall caps for the conservation of earthen walls at Pecos.

    (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

    Figure 20. Fort Union: Original brick cornices remaining on adobe walls.

    (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    11/17

    Figure 21. Fort Selden: Coving and undercutting is occurring to many of the wall bases at the

    Fort. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

    Figure 22. Fort Selden: Deteriorated sections are removed before new adobes are placed in the

    wall bases. (Caperton, Thomas J. Stabilization of Fort Seldens Ruins. Association for

    Preservation Technology (APT) Bulletin 22, No. 3 (1990): 32.)

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    12/17

    Figure 23. Fort Craig: Deterioration pattern to the earthen remains of the storehouse caused by

    rain and lack of a good drainage system. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

    Figure 24. Fort Craig: Plants growing around the ruins. Vegetation on earthen sites should be

    planned and/or controlled. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    13/17

    Figure 25. Pecos: Vegetation growing out of a historic wall. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

    Figure 26. Fort Union: Wall braces. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    14/17

    Figure 27. Fort Selden: Wall brace, more visually intrusive than those used at Fort Union.

    (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

    Figure 28. Casa Grande: Ruins, prior to construction of the rst shelter in 1902.

    (Photo from: 5/20/07)

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    15/17

    Figure 29. Casa Grande: First site shelter, constructed in 1903.

    (Photo from: 5/20/07

    Figure 30. Casa Grande: Current shelter. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    16/17

    Figure 31. Fort Davis: Concrete bond beam installed on top of the adobe walls causing

    damage to the historic material. (Photo by author, Jul. 2006).

    Figure 32. Tumacacori: The deteriorated church building in 1886. (Photo from: 5/20/07

  • 7/31/2019 Final Thesis Figures

    17/17

    Figure 33. Coronado: Reconstructed room. (Photo by author, Aug. 2006).

    Figure 34. Coronado: Outlining of historic wall locations through the laying of adobe brick.

    (Photo by author Aug 2006)