Final presentation temp city team

19
Temporary City - Summer Charrette Kevin O'Sullivan, Shane Waring, Gerry Farrell, Igor Gocur, Blaithin Quinn, Nuala Flood, Simon Canz, Dave Andrews

Transcript of Final presentation temp city team

Page 1: Final presentation temp city team

Temporary City - Summer Charrette

Kevin O'Sullivan, Shane Waring, Gerry Farrell, Igor Gocur, Blaithin Quinn, Nuala Flood, Simon Canz, Dave Andrews

Page 2: Final presentation temp city team

Temporary City - Summer Charrette

+ Dame Court selected as a Study Site to apply theories and outcomes of my initial research

+ Research Theme: Temporary Urbanism- the activation of urban space through temporary interventions and low cost infrastructure improvements

+ How Temporary Urbanism can be leveraged as a strategic component of urban planning, and leveraged as a platform for citizen and business initiatives

+ Temporary City Team's work will inform my research project

Page 3: Final presentation temp city team

Map of Local Districts & Quarters

Dame Court is part of Dame District, not specifically addressed in Grafton St. Quarter Public Realm Plan, and is outside of the Creative Quarter.

Creative Quarter

Grafton St. Quarter

Dame District

Page 4: Final presentation temp city team

Specific Study Site - Dame Court

So

uth

Gre

at G

eo

rge

s S

tree

t

Exchequer Street

Dame Lane

Da

me

Co

urt

Page 5: Final presentation temp city team

Specific Study Site - Dame Court

So

uth

Gre

at G

eo

rge

s S

tree

t

Exchequer Street

Dame Lane

Da

me

Co

urt

+ Businesses have collaborated to identify common needs and develop a vision for the street

+ Dublin City BID helped develop an Area Action Plan

+ Site chosen because: pre-existing needs, familiarity with temporary interventions, collaborative business model in place, and an expressed interest by DCC to use temporary interventions in area

Page 6: Final presentation temp city team

Definitions - Temporary Urbanism

+ Any intervention in the public realm that is not permanent - one that typically seeks to inform the function or perception of the public realm

+ StreetFeast, Clarendon St., Fade St., Parklet, Guerrila bike lanes

+ Can be Top-Down or Bottom-up

Page 7: Final presentation temp city team

Temporary City Vision

+ We aim to redefine the approach to both the management and the use of public space (Shared Vision, Interactive and Engaging Spaces)

+ We are looking at the middleground where the street is a platform for local, site-specific initiatives

+ The strategic application of this through a measured process, that will inform the eventual and on going development of the street

Page 8: Final presentation temp city team

Temporary City Vision

+ Working towards developing a model for strategically-applied Temporary Urbanism

+ Dame Court as pilot site to test: - the definition of strategically-applied Temporary Urbanism - the management structures we assume are required - the potential tools or ideas we think could happen

Page 9: Final presentation temp city team

Temporary Urbanism - A Platform

+ Develop a Platform that citizens, businesses, and DCC can use to generate and trial new ideas within the public realm

+ Platform has 2 layers: - A Steering Group that systematically steers and promotes possibilities - In the case of Dame Court, it is the defined approach to intervening on the street

Page 10: Final presentation temp city team

The Steering Group

+ A Stewardship process that oversees a structured program of interventions

+ An on-the-ground ambassador (a local champion) to manage the execution of the program, make and nurture links with stockholders, and see projects through

+ This is guided by an over arching set of deals (Mission Statement) + Uses a transparent measurement structure to guide what is done and how it is done

Page 11: Final presentation temp city team

Steering Group - Mission Statement

+ To steer and promote possibilities for development within the public realm.

+ This is achieved by forming an understanding of the nature of a specific street, district, or neighbourhood.

+ This is applied through a structured platform that requests new ideas and initiatives, transparently prioritises the projects, manages the executinio of them

+ This is systematically assessed through a measured, transparent process

+ Each intervention is considered a Minimal Viable Product-the smallest viable intervention that can test the efficacy of the overall project as well as the specific intervention

+ Each is measured and lessons are cycled back into the overall project.

+ The Steering Group itself is an MVP

Page 12: Final presentation temp city team

Possible Steering Group Members

+ Representatives from key stake holders:

DCC Rep Dublin City BID Rep Local Business Rep Local Citizen Rep Community Artist Local Built Environment Practitioner Researcher/Student

+ Characteristics of the Ambassador:

Knowledge of city and city mechanisms Knowledge of street, district, or neighbourhood Local Citizen

Page 13: Final presentation temp city team

Steering Group - Process Map

NEEDS

PLATFORM

STREETCITIZEN/

BUSINESS

Page 14: Final presentation temp city team

The Street - The Vision

+ Mobilise a platform for citizen, business, and DCC initiatives

+ Use Temporary Urbanism as an iterative, measured process that informs the ongoing development of the street

+ Ensure all interventions and development follows a set of stated principles and intentions: The platform is a catalyst It is an outlet for user generated initiatives It seeks a rebalancing of the street It promotes a flexible approach to street revitalisation It is iterative, accepts failure, and applies lessons

Page 15: Final presentation temp city team

The Street - Temporary Interventions

+ Each intervention is considered a MVP (Minimal Viable Product)

+ These are Built, Measured, and Learned from

+ They are planned by identifying what we want to learn, how we are going to measure, resulting in what it is to be built

+ Each intervention informs how and what type of intervention happens within the space and informs the ongoing, incremental development of the street

+ They test the very nature of the project itself

BUILDMEASURE

LEARN

LEARNMEASURE

BUILD

How it Happens

How it is Designed

Page 16: Final presentation temp city team

The Nature of the Street

+ It feels like: Heavy use at opposite ends of street, with a neglected core Hidden away, secluded, quiet, slows you down, feels like you've discovered it

+ We seek to:

Cultivate a "meaningful" experience Use an assets based approach to drive future proposals Trial new ideas, celebrate failure, and promote citizen manipulation of the built environment

Page 17: Final presentation temp city team

The Street - 5 Possible Initial Ideas

+ Close Street to all vehicle traffic

+ Curtail car traffic

+ 100 movable chairs placed in central core area

+ Art focus in central core

+ Animate building facades in central core

Page 18: Final presentation temp city team

Possible Ideas

Page 19: Final presentation temp city team

Temporary City Conclusions

+ Identified limitations to previous examples of Temporary Urbanism or its possible potential

+ Proposed a new model for management of the public realm and a new way for people to use and engage with it

+ We propose a Steering Group with a clear mission and transparent measurement process

+ Each intervention informs the next as well as the overall project itself

+ It is in response to real, established needs, is within context, and responsive to the nature of the site

+ It is achievable and can be trailed immediately