Final minutes of 204 SEAC meeting dated...

Minutes of 204th SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015

The 204th meeting of SEAC was held in Directorate of Environment, U.P. on

21/02/2015. Following members were present in the meeting along with Secretary,

SEAC:

1. Dr. M. S. Khan, Chairman

2. Shri S.N. Singh Member

3. Dr. S.K. Upadhayay Member

4. Dr. Asheesh Kumar Singh Member

5. Shri S.C. Bramhchari Member

6. Dr. D. C. Gupta, Member

7. Shri Sanjay Kumar, I.A.S. Secretary

The Chairman welcomed the members to the 204th SEAC meeting.

The minutes of 203rd SEAC meeting dated 20/02/2015 were confirmed.

The Members of SEAC unanimously taken following decisions on the agenda points

discussed:

1- Group Housing Project “Cosmic Corporate Park-3” at Plot No-1, Sector-154, Noida,

U.P. M/s Surya Jyoti Software Pvt. Ltd. Sri Sandeep Pahwa, Director, 281, Azad

Mandi, Delhi, File No. 2082/ AD-H.

The committee noted that Mr. Sandeep Pahwa, Director, M/s Surya Jyoti Software

Pvt. Ltd. submitted an application dated 01/10/2013 in the Directorate for environmental

clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Project “Cosmic Corporate Park-3” at Plot No-1,

Sector-154, Noida, U.P. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 07/06/2014

wherein the project proponent did not appear. The committee also observed that the project

reports have also not been circulated to Members. The matter was deferred. The matter was

again scheduled for appraisal in SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Lakhvendar Singh, authorized representative

alongwith their consultant M/s Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata. The committee

observed that plot area of the project is mentioned as 20,002.40 sqm however the possession

on the site has only been provided for plot area 15,000 sqm by the Noida Authority. The

committee also observed that the whole proposal is calculated for plot area 20,002.40 sqm

which should be revised as per actual availability of land. The committee also found that

some constructed areas like parking, basement etc. have not been included in built-up area.

The committee directed the project proponent to revise and submit the matter for appraisal.

The matter is deferred till submission of revised proposals. The matter shall discussed by

committee after submission of information as above.

Minutes of 204th

SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015

of 62

2- Expansion of Group Housing Project "Galaxy North Avenue" at plot no. GC-3,

Gaur City-1, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. Ms. Manju Sharma, G.M. Project, D-255, Vivek

Vihar, New Delhi File No. 2277/ DD-Sh.

The committee noted that M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. submitted an

application dated 05/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance of Expansion of

Group Housing Project "Galaxy North Avenue", GC-3, Gaur City, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. The

mater was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 10/01/2015 wherein the project

proponent did not appear. Later, though their letter dated 12/01/2015 the proponent informed

that he could not attend the meeting dated 10/01/2015 due to health reasons and requested to

include the matter in SEAC agenda for consideration. The matter was again scheduled for

appraisal in SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Rajesh Jodhani, project proponent along with their

consultant M/s EQMS India Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and

the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Expansion of Group Housing Project

"Galaxy North Avenue" at plot no. GC-3, Gaur City-1, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. M/s

Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd.

2. M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure (P) Ltd. has taken environment clearance for

development of the Project Integrated Township “Gaur City” at GH-01, Sector-4,

Greater Noida, G.B.Nagar, U.P vide letter no. 470/SEAC/531/2010/AA(S)/ dated

11th January, 2011. M/s Gaursons has also obtained Consent to Establish from

UPPCB for construction of the project vide letter no. F78749 C-1/N/N.O.C-

686/2010/5 dated 12th January, 2011.

• M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure (P) Ltd. has allotted plot no GC-03 (part of

plot GH-01) to M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. for development of

Group Housing Project “North Avenue-I”.

• M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. has developed group housing “North

Avenue-I” at Plot No. GC-3, Gaur City-1, Plot No.GH-01, Sector-4, Greater

Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Plot area of this project is 20000 sq.m (4.942 acres). Project

comprises of development of living facility (Block A-F) and allied facilities like

community building, rain water harvesting facility, power supply, landscaping,

roads, water supply system and waste management system. Built-up area of

72846.836 sqm is constructed at the project site till date.

• M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. has planned to expand the project by

developing an additional Block G comprising of 225 dwelling units within the plot

GC-03 to avail additional purchasable FAR of 75% with permission of GNIDA.

Built-up area of the project after expansion will be 96852.071 sqm.

3. Area details of the project are as follows:

S.

N.

Description Existing

Area (sq m)

Expansion

Area (sq m)

Total Area

(sq m)

Area

Percentage

(%)

1 Plot Area 20000 100%

2 Permissible Ground Coverage (@35%

of plot area)

7000 --

3 Proposed Ground Coverage

(@25.84% of plot area)

3922.789 1246.16 5168.949 25.84 %

Minutes of 204th


of 62

4 Permissible FAR (@350% of plot

area)

70000 --

5 Proposed FAR (@336.176% of plot

area)

47877.933 19357.281 67235.214 --

6 Permissible 15% FAR 10500 --

7 Proposed 15% of FAR 5183.581 1454.73 6638.311 --

8 Community Hall (included within

FAR)

231.69 0 231.69 --

9 Stilt Area 3020.122 1181.224 4201.346 --

10 Podium 3501.70 0 3501.70 --

11 Basement Area 13264.2 2012.0 15276.2 --

12 Built-up Area 72847.536 24005.235 96852.771 --

13 Open Area 14831.051 74.16 %

37.08%

25.84%

11.24%

14 Green Area (@50% of open area) 7416.0

15 Area Under Roads 5168.593

16 Other Paved Area 2246.458

17 Maximum Height of Building 90 m --

18 No. of dwelling units 590 225 815 --

4. Built-up details of the project are as follows: Tower Total Gr.

Coverage Total FAR 15%

permissible

FAR

Non-FAR /Stilt

Parking Area

Built up No. of Floors

No. of Units/Floor

Total Dwelling

Units

Block A 504.515 6365.382 609.935 478.611 7453.946 B+S+14 6 84

Block B 569.257 7268.604 600.782 541.016 8410.402 B+S+14 8 112

Block C 569.257 7268.604 600.782 541.016 8410.402 B+S+14 8 112

Block D 504.515 6365.382 609.935 478.611 7453.946 B+S+14 6 84

Block E 653.264 8582.446 858.052 590.228 10030.726 B+S+14 6 84

Block F 722.281 12027.515 1504.395 390.64 13922.555 B+S+19 6 114

Block G (Expansion)

1246.16 19357.281 1454.73 1181.224 21993.234 B+S+25 9 225

Podium -- -- -- 3501.70 3501.70 -- -- --

Basement -- -- -- 15276.2 15276.2 -- -- --

Staircase 37.00 -- 37 -- 37 -- -- --

LT HT

Meter

Room

101.45 -- 101.45 -- 101.45 -- -- --

Watchman

Room

9.00 -- 9 -- 9 -- -- --

Water

Tank

155.00 -- 155 -- 155 -- -- --

Platform for

Transformer

72.25 -- 72.25 -- 72.25 -- -- --

HT meter

room

25.00 -- 25 -- 25 -- -- --

Total 5168.9 67235.214 6638.311 22979.246 96852.771 -- -- 815

5. Salient feature of the project is as follows: S.

No.

Description Existing Expansion

1. Geographical coordinates of the

Project Site

Latitude: 28°33’21.86” N, Longitude: 77°26’29.34” E

2. Plot Area 20,000.10 m

2

3. Estimated Population 3393 1294

4. Built-up Area 72847.536 m

2

24005.235 m2

Minutes of 204th


of 62

5. Solid Waste Generated 1556.65 kg/day 593.45 kg/day

6. Electricity load (Noida Power

Company Ltd.)

2733 KW

1025 KW

7. Backup Power 2000 KVA

8. No. of RWH pits 4 Pits

9. Parking proposed 947 ECS

10. Total Water Requirement 299 KLD 101 KLD

11. Fresh Water Requirement 183 KLD 71 KLD

12. Source of water Municipal Supply

5. Water requirement of the project is as follows: Category Water

Req./capita

(liters)

Existing

Occupancy

(Nos.)/ Area

Existing

Water Req.

(KLD)

Expansion

Occupancy

(Nos.)/

Area

Expansion

Water

Req.

(KLD)

Total

Occupancy

(Nos.)/

Area

Total

Water

Req.

(KLD)

Residents 86 2950 254 1125 97 4075 351

Staff 30 148

4

56 2 204 6

Visitors 15 295 4 113 2 408 6

Domestic Water

Requirement

3393 262 1294 101 4687 363

Landscape 3 l/sq m 7416.0 sq m 22 -- -- 7416.0 sq

m

22

DG

Cooling

0.9l/kVA/hr 2000 kVA 15 -- -- 2000 kVA 15

Total Water

Requirement

-- 299 -- 101 -- 400

6. Waste water details of the project is as follows: Category Existing

Quantity

(KLD)

Expansion

Quantity (KLD)

Total (Existing +

Expansion) KLD

Total Water Requirement 299 101 400

Domestic Water Requirement 262 101 363

Fresh Water Requirement (@70% of dom.

Water req.)

183 71 254

Flushing Water Requirement (@30% of dom.

Water req.)

79 30 109

Sewage Generated (80% fresh water for

domestic use +100% flushing water)

225 87 312

Capacity of STP 375

Recovered Water from STP

• Flushing

• DG Cooling

• Landscaping

• Maintaining artificial water body/ fire-fighting/car & road

washing/Municipal Sewer

250

109.0

15.0

22.0

104.0

7. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as

amended.

The committee noted that the proponent has submitted revised sanctioned Greater

Noida Industrial Development Authority, Structural design approval from Jamia Millia Islamiya, Fie NOC, Airport Authority of India NOC, Site plan, Plumbing plan, parking plan,

rain water harvesting plan, electrical layout, fire fighting plan, landscape plan, storm water management plan, basement plan. The committee discussed the matter and recommended

grant of environmental clearance to the proposals for Expansion of Group Housing Project

Minutes of 204th


of 62

"Galaxy North Avenue" at plot no. GC-3, Gaur City-1, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. alongwith

general conditions as prescribed by the authority for construction project and following

specific conditions:

1. All necessary regulatory approvals regarding expansion of the proposed project shall be

obtained after approval of expansion in FAR by GNIDA.

2. Adequate green cover not less than 33% of the plotted area should be provided within

the premises. 3. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more

capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for

designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization. 4. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken with regular testing and monitoring

of treated water. 5. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to

be used in-house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving it to end

users.

6. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to Rs. 1.0 crore of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board

of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the

authority.

7. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in

accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as

amended).

8. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan

submitted.

9. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% Solar lighting is to be

provided in the common areas/common stairs. 10. Parking guideline as per Greater Noida Development Authority should be followed.

Parking for disabled persons should be explored. 11. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

12. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

13. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after

permission from CGWB.

14. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets

capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building.

15. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP

to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

16. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.

17. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.

18. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of

residents.

19. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be

followed for construction work.

20. Dual plumbing should be adopted.

21. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority. 22. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any

buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

23. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In

case of default the Environmental Clearance will deem to be cancelled.

24. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for

construction.

25. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.

26. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose.

27. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc. Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including

the proper treatment and the disposal of the wastes.

3- Group Housing Project at Khasra No-962 M, Vill-Noor Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s

Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd. Sri Rajeev Agrawal, Director, R-8/54, Raj

Nagar, Ghaziabad U.P. File No. 2332/AD-Sub

The committee noted that M/s Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd. submitted an

application dated 19/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance for Group

Housing Project at Khasra No-962 M, Vill-Noor Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Bankey Bihari

Infrahome (P) Ltd. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015

wherein the committee observed that the project report has not been received by the

committee members yet and the matter was deferred till next meeting with a instruction to

proponent to communicate the reports to all members. The matter was again schedule for

SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Soumen Joarder, authorized representative of the

project proponent along with their consultant M/s Ascenso Management And Consulting

Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation

made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project at Khasra No-

962M, Vill-Noor Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd.

2. Salient features of the project are as follows:

Name and Location of the Project Group Housing Project at Khasra No-962 M, Village

Noor Nagar, District- Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh

Developers of the project M/s. Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd.

Total Plot Area 8,379.4 m

2

Built-up Area(Proposed FAR + Basement area +

Services area) 39,100.00 m

2

Total Water Consumption 145 KLD

Total Freshwater Requirement 104 KLD

Power Requirement 1,596 KVA Source: PVVNL

Power Backup 3 DG Sets of total capacity of 995 KVA

(1x380+1x200+1x415 KVA)

Total Parking provided 475 ECS

Solid Waste to be Generated 782.85 kg/day

No. of RWH Pits 2 pits

Height of the Tallest Building 55 m

Minutes of 204th


of 62

3. Area statement of the project is as follows:

S. No. Particulars Area in Sq.m. Percentage

1. Total Plot Area 8,379.40 ……

2. Area for road widening 509.70 6.08% of total Plot Area

3. Net Balance plot area 7,869.70 93.9% of total Plot Area

4. Less 15% Green Area (mandatory) 1,180.50 15% of net balance plot area

5. Provided green area mandatory 1,180.50 15% of net balance plot area

6. Space left for Garbage area 33.00 ……

7. Net Plot Area 6,656.22 79.4% of total Plot Area

8. Permissible Ground Coverage 2,662.49 40% of Net Plot area

9. Achieved Ground Coverage 1,728.90 25.97% of Net plot area

10. Permissible FAR 26,624.88 400% of Net plot area

11. Proposed FAR

• Residential FAR

• Convenient FAR

• Community FAR

26,071.86

25,868.91

75.00

127.95

391.6% of Net plot area

99.2% of Proposed FAR



12. Total Basement Area

• Upper Basement Area

• Lower Basement Area

10,699.54

5,349.77

5,349.77

160.16% of Net Plot Area

50 % of Total Basement Area

50% of Total Basement Area

13. Stilt Area 1,525.97 22.92% of Net Plot Area

14. Service Area (Mumty, Machine Room&

Staircase) 803.31 ----

15. Built up Area (Proposed FAR+ Total

Basement Area + Stilt + Services Area) 39,100.68 ----

4. Details of building blocks are as follows:

S. No. Type of Building Storey

1. Block A 2 Basement+ Stilt+15

2. Block B 2 Basement+ Stilt+16

3. Block C 2 Basement+ Stilt+15

4. Convenient Shops 4 Nos. (in Block –A)

5. Community Area in Block –B

(on Ground Floor)

5. Water requirement of the project is as follows:

S.

N.

Description Population /

Area

Unit water

consumption

(liters)

Total water

required

(KLD)

Water

requirement

for Domestic

Use (KLD)

Flushing

Water

(KLD)

A Residential

Population

1548 86 133.12 100.62 32.50

B Visitor 155 15 2.3 0.93 1.39

C Community

Population

110 15 1.65 0.66 0.99

D Horticulture

(1180.5 m2

)

--- 1 liter 1.18 --- ---

E DG Set Cooling

(995 KVA)

--- 0.9 kVA/h 5.37 --- ---

G Fire Fighting Tank -- 1% of total

Water

requirement

1.4 -- --

Total 145.05

Says

145 KLD

102.21

Says

102 KLD

34.89

Says

35 KLD

Minutes of 204th


of 62

6. Waste water details of the project is as follows:

Details Water (KLD) Water requirement for domestic purpose 102

Wastewater to be generated from domestic use (@ 80% of domestic water requirement) 81.6

Water requirement for Flushing Purpose 35

Wastewater to be generated from Flushing (@ 100% of flushing requirement) 35

Total Wastewater generated 117 KLD

7. A sewage treatment plant with 150 KLD capacity based on FAB technology is

proposed.

8. Solid waste generation details of the project is as follows:

S. N. Category of Solid Waste Waste Generation Occupancy Waste generated 1. Residential 0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 1,703 766.35

2. Community Area 0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 110 16.5

Total waste generated 782.85 kg/day


amended.

The committee discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following

information:

1- Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding ownership.

2- Block wise/floor wise area details.

3- Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal sewer/drain.

4- Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental management facilities should be submitted. The same should be mentioned in

customer brochure also. 5- A 03 m peripheral green belt shall be left all along the periphery and shall not be

encroached for any other purposes. Plan for the same should be submitted. 6- 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan for the

same should be submitted.

7- Copy of structure design by qualified engineers.

8- All services plan.

9- Alstonia should be added in list of trees.

10- Plan for use of reflecting paints.

11- Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with Rs. 2.50 crore along with

budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.

The Committee decided to issue Environmental Clearance conditionally to submit all information required.

4- Group Housing Project “Sparsh” at Plot No-GH-02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida,

U.P. M/s Enchant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Sri Mradul Srivastava, B-11, Sector-

1, Noida, U.P. File No. 2341/ AD-H

The committee noted that M/s Enchant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. submitted an undated

application for environmental clearance for Group Housing Project “Sparsh” at Plot No-GH-

02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Enchant Infrastructure Private, received in the

Directorate on 28/05/2014. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated

31/01/2015 wherein the committee observed that the project report has not been received by

Minutes of 204th


of 62

Members and the project proponent was directed to communicate the project report to all

Members. The matter was again listed for SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Sanjeev Mahendra, authorized representative of

project proponent along with their consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The

proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the

committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Sparsh” at Plot

No-GH-02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Enchant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

2. Salient features of the project is as follows:

Project

Name “Sparsh” Group Housing Project at Sector 12, Greater Noida, UP

Land

Requirement Plot Area

Built-up Area

Remarks

12500 m2 or 3.08

acre

69421 m2 The land is in possession of Proponent. The

land for the proposed project was purchased

in 2012. Lease Agreement

Water

Requirement

Phases Fresh Water in KLD Treated Water in KLD Total Water in

KLD

Construction 4.2 117.5 121.7

Operation 131.5 191.3 323

STP Capacity-270 KLD Based on FAB (Fluidised Aerobic Bio Reactor)Technology

Power

Requirement

Phases Power

Requirement

Source Back-up power supply

Constructio

n

150 kVA

(120 kw)

UP Power Corporation

Ltd.

Back-up of 150 kVA will be

provided by one DG set

Operation 2300 kVA

(1910 kw)

UP Power Corporation

Ltd.

Back-up will be provided by one 2

nos. of DG sets of 750 kva as

working and 1 no. DG set of 500

kVA as standby

Rain Water Harvesting Pits 03 Pits

Parking proposed 534 ECS

3. Area details of the project is as follows:

Category Area (Acre) Area (m

2

) Area (%)

Ground Coverage 0.78 2728.84 21.83

Open Area 1.14 4631.5 37.05

Green area 1.15 4675.3 37.4

Commercial 0.1 435.8 3.5

Meter Room 0.002 9 0.07

Security Room 0.004 19.8 0.15

Total Area 3.08 12500 100

Tower F.A.R Area m2

No. of Dwelling Units No of Floors No. of Basement

A 5589.5 58 G+14 2

F

B 7194.3 94 G+15 2

E

C 8996.5 140 G+17 2

D

Proposed Commercial FAR = 151.15

m2

Meter Room F.A.R =

9 m2

Total Population = 2754

Total F.A.R Area = 43,721.2 m2

Minutes of 204th


of 62

4. Water requirement details of the project is as follows:

Sl.

No. Description No. of

person Per capita

consumption (LPCD) LPD Total water

requirement

(KLD)

Source

Fresh

water

Treated

Water

A Residential occupants 2754 65 21 236844 236.80

GNDA

& STP B Visitors 275 5 10 4125 4.10

C Service Staff 50 65 21 4300 4.30

D Kitchen and Pantry 10000 10

E Commercial 50 15 30 2250 2.25

F Landscaping - - - 4675 4.67 STP

G Road washing/ Road

side tree watering

- - - 59700 59.79

Subtotal (A+B+C+D+E+F+G) 323

Total Requirement 323 KLD

5. Waste water details of the project is as follows:

Sl.

No. Description Total

Population Fresh

Water

Requirement

(KLD)

Treated

Water

Requirement

(KLD)

Flow

to

sewer

(KLD)

Sewage

Treatment

Plant

a Residential Occupants 2754 115.6 121.1 195.1 270 KLD

Capacity

Based on FAB

Technology

b Visitors 275 1.4 2.75 3.5

c Maintenance Staff 50 3.25 1.05 3.54

d Commercial 50 0.75 1.5 1.95

e Kitchen & Pantry - 10 - 8

f Landscaping - - 4.67 0

g Road Washing / Road Side

Tree Watering

- - 59.7 0

Sub Total 131 190.86 212.09


Type of waste Quantity

Municipal wastes@ 0.2 kg/capita/day 550 kg/day

Horticultural wastes@ 0.004 kg/m2/day 17.6 kg/day

Street sweepings@ 0.1 kg/capita/day 275.4 kg/day


amended.

The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit

following information:

1. Land allotment letter.

2. Environmental sensitivity in 10 KM area.

3. Copy of all sanctioned map

4. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its

percentage of total area.

5. Tower/block wise area details.

6. Submit the details of area chart.

7. All services plans.

8. Submit the copy of letter as applied to Noida Development. AUTH. for source of

water supply.

9. Details of surface parking along with road width and movement plan is to be

submitted.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

10. Structure design to be submitted

11. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with Rs. 2.50 crore along with

budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and

submitted.

12. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan

for the same should be submitted.

13. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding

ownership.

14. Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal

sewer/drain.

15. Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental

management facilitates.

The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.

5- Group Housing Project “Ashwaryam” at Sector-16C Noida Extension, U.P. M/s

Wall Rock Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Sri R.K.Gupta, Director, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad.

File No. 2342/ DD-DS

The committee noted that M/s Wall Rock Infratech Pvt. Ltd. submitted an un dated

application for environmental clearance for Group Housing Project “Ashwaryam” at Sector-

16C Noida Extension, U.P. received in the Directorate on dated 28/05/2014. The matter was

earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015 wherein the committee observed that

the project report has not been received by the committee members yet and the matter was

deferred till next meeting with a instruction to proponent to communicate the reports to all

members. The matter was again schedule for SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri R.K. Gupta, Managing Director along with their

consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The proponent, through the documents

submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Ashwaryam” at

Sector-16C Noida Extension, U.P. M/s Wall Rock Infratech Pvt. Ltd.


Project Name Group Housing Project Aishwaryam, Sector 16, Noida Extension

Land Requirement Plot Area

Built-up Area

Remarks

10010 m2

or 2.47 acre

55366.10 m

2

FAR area + Facility area =

40273.21 m2

Basement area = 15092.89 m2

The land is a Sub-lease land. The

land for the proposed project was Sub-leased in 2012. Lease

Document

Water Requirement Phases Fresh Water in

KLD

Treated Water in KLD Total Water in KLD


Operation 96.65 148 244.6

STP Capacity-200 KLD, MBBR technology based.

Power Requirement 1600 KVA power will be supplied by UPPCL and back-up power will be provided by

3 DG sets of 600 kVA .

Parking Provided 530 ECS

Minutes of 204th


of 62

3. Water requirement details of the project is as follows:

S.

NO.

DESCRIPTION QUANTITY

(LPCD)

POPULATION/

AREA

FRESH

WATER

(KLD)

TREATED

WATER

(KLD)

WATER

REQUIREMENT

(KLD)

A Domestic Activities

1 Drinking 7 2180 15.26 0 15.26

2 Bathing 20 2180 43.6 0 43.6

3 Flushing 21 2180 0 45.78 45.78

4 Washing 15 2180 32.7 0 32.7

5 Miscellaneous 23 2180 0 50.14 50.14

SUB-TOTAL -A (1+2+3+4+5) 91.56 95.92 187.48

B VISITORS

1 Flushing 5 218 - 1.09 1.09

2 Miscellaneous 10 218 2.18 - 2.18

SUB-TOTAL (B) - - 2.18 1.09 3.27

C COMMERCIAL

1 Flushing 30 50 - 1.5 1.5

2 Miscellaneous 15 50 0.75 - 0.75

SUB-TOTAL (C) - - 0.75 1.5 2.25

D SERVICE STAFF

1 Flushing 65 50 - 3.25 3.25

2 Miscellaneous 21 50 1.05 - 1.05

SUB-TOTAL (D) - - 1.05 3.25 4.3

E HORTICULTURE Area (m

2

) 2491

- 2.49 2.49

F ROAD WASHING

& PLANTATION

- -

- 44.86 44.86

SUB-TOTAL (E+F) - 47.35 47.35

Total Water Demand in KLD 95.54 149.11 244.65

4. Waste water generation details of the project is as follows PARAMETERS UNIT WATER

CONSUMPTION

(KLD)

WASTEWATER GENERATION (KLD)

STP (20%

EXCESS) FRESH TREATED FRESH TREATED TOTAL

80% 95%

Drinking water KLD 15.26 0 12.2 0 12.2 MBBR Technology

STP of

198.36 KL

(Say 200

KL)

Bathing KLD 43.6 0 34.9 0 34.9

Flushing KLD 0 45.78 0 43.5 43.5

Washing KLD 32.7 0 26.16 0 26.2

Misc KLD 0 50.14 0 47.6 47.6

Visitors KLD 1.09 2.18 0.87 2.1 2.9

Commercial KLD 0.75 1.5 0.6 1.4 2.0

Service staff KLD 3.25 1.05 2.6 1.00 3.6

Total in KLD 96.65 100.65 77.32 95.61 172.9

5. Solid waste generation details is as follows:

Municipal solid waste @ 0.2 kg/capita/day 436.0 kg/day

Horticultural waste @ 0.004 kg/m2

/day 160.88 kg/day

Street sweeping @ 0.1 kg/capita/day 218.0 kg/day

6. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as amended.




2. Environmental sensitivity in 10 KM area.

3. Copy of all sanctioned map

Minutes of 204th


of 62





7. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with 2.50 crore along

with budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and

submitted.




ownership.


sewer/drain.



12. Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been

permitted.

13. Width of internal roads should be according to length of junction to junction.

It should be corrected accordingly.

14. Land use of the proposed site should be as per proposed activity. Submit the

related papers.

15. Approach road width to be shown.

16. All the documents presented in the meeting should be duly sign by the

Proponent.

17. Structure design to be submitted.

18. Land scape plan to be submitted with list of trees. 03 metre green to be

provided all side of the proposed site.

19. Copy of NOC from fire fighting is to be submitted.

20. Map of surface parking to be submitted.

21. NOC from Air Port Authority to be submitted.


6- Commercial Project “The Correnthum” at Plot No-A-41, Sector-62, Noida, U.P.

M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd., Sri Sandeep Sahni, , Ground Floor, Plot N0-A-41,

Sector-62, Noida. File No. 2343/ AD-VB

The committee noted that M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd. submitted an undated

application for environmental clearance for Commercial Project “The Correnthum” at Plot

No-A-41, Sector-62, Noida, U.P. M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd. received in the Directorate on

28/05/2014. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015 wherein

the committee observed that the project report has not been received by the committee

members yet and the matter was deferred till next meeting with a instruction to proponent to

communicate the reports to all members. The matter was again schedule for SEAC meeting

dated 21/02/2015.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

A presentation was made by Shri Bimal Kachroo, authorized representative of the

project proponent along with their consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The

proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the

committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Commercial Project “The Correnthum” at

Plot No-A-41, Sector-62, Noida, U.P. M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd.


Project Name “The Corenthum” Office Complex, Sector 62, NOIDA

Land Requirement Plot Area Built-up Area

20,000 m2

or 4.94 acre

Existing Proposed

50193.45m2

48839.63m2

Water

Requirement

Phases Fresh Water in

KLD

Treated Water in

KLD

Total Water in KLD


Operation 33.0 109 142.0

STP Capacity-150 KLD, based on Package type Technology

Power

Requirement

5522 KVA power will be be supplied by UP Power Corporation and back-up power

will be provided by 5 nos. of DG sets of 1000 kva as working and 1 no. DG set of 500

kva as standby.

Proposed Parking 1240 ECS

Rain waster harvesting pits

04 Pits

3. Area details of the project is as follows: Category Existing area for (Tower

A & B) m2

Proposed area for

(Tower C) m2

Total Area in m2

Ground Coverage 5,124.62 638.99 5,763.61

Landscape 7,159.02 0 7,159.02

Open area, Road area, Paved area 7583.5 -638.99 6944.51

Guard room 25 0 25

Machine room 105 0 105

Total Plot Area 20,000 20,000 20,000

4. Water requirement of the project is as follows: S.

No.

Description Unit Quantity Population/Area Fresh

water

(KLD)

Treated

Water

(KLD)

Water

Requirement

(KLD)

A DOMESTIC ACTIVITIES

1 Drinking use LPCD 7 4000 28 0 28

2 Bathing use LPCD 0 4000 0 0 0

3 Flushing use LPCD 21 4000 0 84 84

4 Washing use LPCD 0 4000 0 0 0

5 Miscellaneous LPCD 4 4000 0 16 16

Subtotal (1+2+3+4+5) 28 100 128

B VISITORS

1. Flushing LPCD 10 210 2.1 0 2.10

2. Miscellaneous LPCD 5 210 0 1.05 1.05

SUB-TOTAL (B) - - 2.1 1.05 3.15

C MAINTENANCE STAFF

1 Flushing LPCD 65 40 2.6 0 2.60

2 Miscellaneous LPCD 21 40 0 0.84 0.84

Minutes of 204th


of 62

SUB-TOTAL (C) - - 2.6 0.84 3.44

D Horticulture LS 1L/m

2

7159.02 0 7.15 7.15

Total Water Demand in KLD (A+B+C+D) 33 109 142

5. Waste water generation details of the project is as follows: S.

No.

Description Total

Population

Fresh water

requirement(KLD)

Treated Water

(KLD)

Flow to

sewer

(KLD)

Sewerage

Treatment

Plant

a. Office

Occupants

4000 28 84 102.2 150 KLD

package

type

technology

based STP

b. Visitors 210 2.1 1.05 2.67

c. Staff 40 2.6 0.84 2.87

d. Misc 4000 - 16 12.8

e. Gardening 1L/m

2

- 7.15 0

Sub Total 33 109 121

6. Solid waste generation details is as follows: Description Proposed Quantity

Municipal solid waste @ 0.2 kg/capita/day 850 kg/day


/day 71.76 kg/day

Street sweeping@ 0.1 kg/capita/day 425 kg/day


amended.




2. Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been permitted.

Revised proposals as per correct FAR should be submitted. 3. Copy of all sanctioned maps.

4. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its percentage of total area.

5. Tower/block wise area details. 6. All services plans.

7. 2% Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.

8. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan for the

same should be submitted.

9. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding ownership.


sewer/drain.



12. Width of internal roads should be according to length of junction to junction. It should

be corrected accordingly.

13. Land use of the proposed site should be as per proposed activity. Submit the related

papers.

14. Affidavit to be submitted regarding no construction work done.


Minutes of 204th


of 62

7- Office Complex Project “IT cum ITES Centre” at plot no. 1C, Sector-142, Noida,

U.P. M/s Express Infoways Pvt. Ltd. Sri K L Suneja, Director, 21-A, Tughlak Road,

New Delhi. File No. 2352/ DD-Y

The committee noted that M/s Express Infoways Pvt. Ltd. submitted an undated

application for environmental clearance of Office Complex Project “IT cum ITES Centre” at

plot no. 1C, Sector-142, Noida, U.P. received in the Directorate on 30/05/2014. The matter

was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015 wherein the committee observed

that the project report has not been received by the committee members yet and the matter

was deferred till next meeting with a instruction to proponent to communicate the reports to

all members. The matter was again scheduled for SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Amar Singh, authorized representative of project

proponent along with their consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The proponent,

through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Office Complex Project “IT cum ITES

Centre” at plot no. 1C, Sector-142, Noida, U.P. M/s Express Infoways Pvt. Ltd.


Project Name IT Cum ITeS Centre, Plot No. 1C, Sector-142, Noida, Uttar Pradesh

Land Requirement Plot Area Built-up Area Remarks

16188 m2

or 4.0 acre

59816 m2

The project was granted E.C in

October 2007 and now it is going

for the renewal of the same.

Water Requirement Phases Fresh Water in

KLD

Treated Water in

KLD

Total Water in KLD

Constructi

on

9.75 104.49 114.24

Operation 55.11 73.70 128.81

STP Capacity-70 KLD, MBBR technology based.

Power Requirement 1278 KW power will be be supplied by UPPCL and back-up power will be provided

by 2 DG set of 1000 kVA as working and 1 DG set of 750 kVA as standby.

Rain water

harvesting

04 Pits

Proposed Parking 762 ECS


CATEGORY AREA (ACRE) AREA (M

2

) AREA (%)

Ground Coverage 1.2 4856.4 30

Guard & Metre Room 0.004 30 0.18

Green area 2.04 8256.18 51.0

Road & Ramp Area 0.75 3045.46 18.82

Total Plot Area 4.0 16188 100


Sl.

No. Description Unit Quantity Population/Area Fresh

water (KLD)

Treated

Water (KLD)

Water

Requirement (KLD)

A OFFICE OCCUPANTS

1 Flushing LPCD 12 1150 0 13.8 13.8

2 Miscellaneous LPCD 20 1150 23 0 23

SUB-TOTAL (A) - - 23 13.8 36.8

B VISITORS

1 Flushing LPCD 6 40 0 0.24 0.24

2 Miscellaneous LPCD 9 40 0.36 0 0.36

SUB-TOTAL (B) - - 0.36 0.24 0.6

C MAINTENANCE STAFF

Minutes of 204th


of 62

1 Flushing LPCD 20 70 0 1.4 1.4

2 Miscellaneous LPCD 25 70 1.75 0 1.75

SUB-TOTAL (C) - - 1.75 1.4 3.15

D Water Bodies

make-up and

filter back

wash

LS - - 10 - 10

E Cafeteria LS - - 20 - 20

SUB-TOTAL (D+E) - - 30 - 30

F Cooling

Tower

Ltrs - - 20 20

G Road Side

Washing

Ltrs 30 30

H Irrigation Ltrs 1 8256.18 0 8.26 8.26

SUB-TOTAL (F+G+H) - 58.26 58.26

Total Water Demand in KLD 55.11 73.70 128.81

5. Waste water generation details of the project is as follows:

PARAMETERS UNIT WATER

CONSUMPTION WASTEWATER

GENERATION STP (20%

EXCESS)

(KLD) (KLD)

FRESH TREATED FRESH TREATED TOTAL

80% 95%

Office Occupants KLD 23 13.8 18.4 13.11 31.51 STP of 70

KLD is

Proposed

(MBBR

Technology)

Visitors KLD 0.45 0.3 0.36 0.285 0.645

Maintenance Staff KLD 1.75 1.4 1.4 1.33 2.73

Water Bodies make

up and filter back

wash

KLD 10 0 8 0 8

Cafeteria KLD 20 0 16 0 16

Total in KLD 55.2 15.5 44.16 14.725 58.885

6. Solid waste generation details of the project is as follos:

Description Quantity

Municipal solid waste @ 0.2 kg/capita/day 230.0 kg/day


/day 64.75 kg/day

Street sweeping @ 0.1 kg/capita/day 115.0 kg/day


amended.





permitted. Revised proposals as per correct FAR should be submitted.

3. Copy of all sanctioned maps.





Minutes of 204th


of 62

7. 2% Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary

provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.




ownership.


sewer/drain.






related papers.

14. Okhla Bird Sanctuary mentioned to be at 10.5 KM. Verification from

competent authority should be submitted in this regard.

15. Management plan for proposed earth excavation from the project.

16. NOC from for fore, Air port Auth. to be submitted.

17. Affidavit regarding no construction done to be submitted.

18. Area details to be submitted.

19. Management of excavated soil.

20. Plan for use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls.

21. Structure design to be submitted.

22. NOC from Air port Authority to be submitted.


8- Rama-Eesh Charitable Trust, Plot No-3, Knowledge Park-I, Greater Noida, U.P. Dri

R C Sharma, Chairman, Rama-Eesh Charitable Trust. File No. 2353/ AD-Sub.

The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the

case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project

proponent.

9- Group Housing Project at Plot No. GH-6B, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Raj

Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Sri R C Goel, Director,M-33, 2nd Floor, Greater Kailash-

1, New Delhi File No. 2358/ OSD-T

The committee noted that M/s Raj Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd. submitted an application

for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-6B, Sector-1, Greater

Noida, U.P. M/s Raj Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd. received in the Directorate on 03/06/2014.

A presentation was made by Shri Sukhveer Singh Bhati, authorized representative

along with their consultant M/s Paramars, Lucknow. The proponent, through the documents


Minutes of 204th


of 62

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-6B,

Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Raj Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd.


Items Proposed Area (sq m) As per State Byelaws (sq m)

Total plot area 20034.8

Ground Coverage 5441.011(27.16%) 7012.18 (35%)

FAR 70095.552 (3.49) 70121.8 (3.5)

Basic – 2.75 (approved)

Purchasable – 0.75 (applied)

Non-FAR Area on Floors 8540.746

Services on surface

• Machine Room

• Guard Room

• Open

Transformer

• DG Room

760.322

531.322

18.00

99.00

112.00

Stilt under tower & podium 12413.714

Basement 16611.053

Total Built up area 108421.387

Open Area including road 14593.789 @72.8% of total plot area

Landscape Area 7391.162 @50.65% of open area and

@36.89% of total plot area

Proposed activities Residential towers, convenience

shops, children play ground, 24hrs water supply, Generator back up for

common amenities, Landscaped

garden

Height of the Building 57 m (S + 18)

Rain water harvesting pits 04 Pits

3. Block wise details are as follows:

Residential Units Description Set Back

Residential

Towers

Block - A 72 Stilt + 18 Floors 15 m

Block - B 68 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m

Block - C 68 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m

Block - D 68 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m

Block - E 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m

Block - F 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m

Block - G 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m

Block - H 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m

Block - I 72 Stilt + 18 Floors 9 m

Block - J 72 Stilt + 18 Floors 15 m

828 housing units


Description Total

Occupancy

Rate of water

demand (lpcd)

Total

Fresh

Water

(KLD)

Total

Flushing/Recycled

water (KLD)

Total

Water

(KLD)

Residential 4140 Fresh Water @ 65

LPCD Flushing

Water @ 21 LPCD

269 87 356

Visitors (10%) 414 Fresh Water @ 5

LPCD

Flushing Water @

10 LPCD

2 4 6

Staff 207 Fresh Water @ 30

LPCD

Flushing Water @

6 3 9

Minutes of 204th


of 62

15 LPCD

Landscape

development

7391.16 sqm 1 l/sqm 7.4 7.4

Cooling water for

DG set

2020 kVA 0.9 l/kVA/Hr 14.54 14.54

Total water 277 115.94

~116

392.94

~393

Water/ Waste water Details

Fresh water 277 KLD

Domestic Flushing water 116 KLD

Horticulture / Landscape 7.4 ~ 8 KLD

Cooling water for DG set 14.54 ~ 15 KLD

Total water requirement 393 KLD

Waste water 314 KLD

STP Capacity 380 KLD (20% extra)

Water Source Municipal water supply

STP sludge 79 kg/day

5. Parking details are as follows:

PARKING PROPOSED

Parking Space & Norms Total Area Area available for parking Total ECS

Podium + Stilt Parking @ 28 ECS 11655.063 465 ECS

14871.196 416 ECS

Total Parking 881 ECS

6. Solid waste generation details are as follos:

S. No. Category Occupancy Per Capita Generation

(kg/day)

Waste

generated (kg/day)

1 Residents 4140 0.50 2070

2 Staff 207 0.25 51.75

3 Visitors 414 0.15 62.1

4 Landscape waste 1.82 acres @ 0.2 kg/acre/day 0.364

TOTAL SOLID WASTE GENERATED 2184.214 ~ 2184

STP Sludge 79

E-waste (<1kg/capita/year) 12

7. Power requirement and backup details are as follows:

Power requirement 2800 kVA

Source of power and supply capacity Noida Power Company Ltd.

Backup power supply arrangement 2 x 1010 kVA

Location of Generator sets At Substation

Stack Height 7.0 m + Highest Building Height


amended.

The committee noted that approved FAR for the project is 2.75 whereas a purchasable

FAR of 0.75 is applied to GNIDA which is not yet approved. However, the project proposals have been prepared on the basis of 3.5 FAR. The committee discussed the matter and

deliberated that appraisal shall be made only on the approved FAR. The project proponents were directed to submit the proposals on the basis of approved FAR. Shri Bhati, authorized

representative of project proponent submitted that it is already 08 months since the submission of the application and requested for early disposal of the matter, the committee

deliberated that the matter may be included in the agenda of next meeting if the revised proposals as above be submitted.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

10. Mirza International Ltd. (Tannery Division) at Village- Magarwara, Unnao. Sri

R.D. Kaushik, 14/6, Civil Lines Kanpur. File No. 1731/ DD-Y

The committee noted that the matter was discussed in joint meeting of SEIAA and

SEAC held on 12/01/2015 wherein following decision was taken:

"It was decided that such projects should be considered as category ‘A’ project and

the exemption should only be considered for projects proposed in Industrial estates

approved by concerned authorities as prescribed in the E.I.A. notification which

clarifies through OM no. J-11013/36/2014-IA-I dated 16-05-2014 that:-

"The expression ‘concerned authorities’ as stated in the aforesaid para of EIA

notification 2006, implies the competent authorities in the State Government/Central

Government, which approve setting up of such Industrial estates or parks. All other

cases as category A should be referred to the Government of India."

The issue of inclusion of industrial land use demarcated in the master plan as eligible

for exemption was also discussed and it was decided that master plan regulations are

for demarcating land uses with or without development as an industrial area/estate and

therefore merely being an Industrial zone in the master plan will not qualify it for

exemption unless it is also an industrial estate as in the EIA notification as above."

The project proponent submitted a letter dated 12/01/2015 received in the Directorate

on 15/01/2015 regarding the matter through which they have submitted certificate from

Public Information Officer, Unnao Shuklaganj Development Authority and letter dated

03/06/1989 of Joint Secretary, Awas Anubhag-3, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh. Alongwith the

same, map of Unnao Shuklaganj Mahayojna have also been submitted wherein land use of

location of Mirza International Ltd., Unnao has been indicated as "Light Industry".

The committee discussed the matter in the light of EIA Notification, 2006 wherein it

has been provisioned that tannery projects outside the notified industrial area shall be treated

as category-A and environmental clearance for them shall be granted by MoEF, Govt. of

India. The committee also discussed the documents submitted by the project proponent and

deliberated that a communication should be made to Industrial Development Department,

Govt. of U.P. to confirm that whether Unnao Shuklaganj Development Authority is

competent to declare Magarwara Unnao as notified industrial area (where M/s Mirza

International Ltd. is situated.). The communication should also include the related documents

submitted by proponent to get comment of Industrial Development Department regarding its

location. A copy of this communication should be endorsed to project proponent also.

The matter shall be discussed after receipt of information from Industrial

Development Department in this regards.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

11- Raw Leather to Finish Leather Having Capacity (8000 Kg/day) M/s Omega

International Unit-III, G-07-08-09-10, Unnao Industrial Estate, Site-II, Unnao,. File

No. 1721/ DD-Y

The committee noted that the terms of reference in the matter were issued through

letter dated 11/10/2013. The final EIA was submitted by the project proponent through letter

dated 08/08/2014. The matter was earlier scheduled for SEAC meeting dated 15/11/2014

wherein the project proponent did not appear. The matter was again scheduled for SEAC

meeting dated 21/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Mayank Nigam, authorized representative along

with their consultant Shri Hari Om Sharan Dwivedi. The proponent, through the documents


1. The environmental clearance is sought for tannery unit M/s Omega International Unit-

III, at G-07-08-09-10, Unnao Industrial Estate, Site-II, Unnao, U.P.

2. Size of the project is proposed as 80000 kg/day Raw Leather to Finish Leather

Having.

3. The project details are as follows:

Feature Description

Site Plot No – G-07-08-09-10, Unnao Industrial Eastate, Site-II,

Unnao-209 801.

Latitude

Longitudes

26°33'55"N

80°32'14”E

Total area acquired

Existing Plant

Proposed Plant

1 Acres (Approx)

Nill

1 Acre (Approx)

No Additional Land is required for Expansion

Type of Land Non Agricultural land (Industrial Estate)

Nearest Port Nil

Nearest Highway State Highway ( Kanpur, Lucknow) 600 M.

Nearest Railway Station Unnao (6 km)

Nearest Airport Lucknow (45 KM)

Nearest Reserved Forest None within 10 km Radius

4. Land use details are as follows:

Land Use Total area (SQM) % of Total Plot

Area under plots 4180

Road and Parking area 540 13

Common Facilities plant and

machinery

1640 40

Green Spaces 1400 34

ETP, Salt recovery and chrome

recovery unit

520 12

Basement nill

5. Raw material details are as follows:

Sr. No. Name of Raw Material Daily Capacity

01 Raw Hide 8000 Kg

02 Sodium Format 75kg/day

03 BCS 375kg/day

04 Synthetic Tanning Agents 750kg/day

06 . Fat Liquors 500 kg/day

07 Dyes 100kgs/day

Minutes of 204th


of 62

08 Binders 150kgs/day

09 Pigments 15 kg/day

10 Top coats 150kg/day

11 Wax Emulsions 20kg/day

12 Feel Modifiers 7/5 kg/day

6. 04 nos. rain water harvesting is proposed for the project.

7. Solid waste generation details are as follows:

Sr. No. Type of Waste Quantity Generation

(MT/Month)

Utilization / Disposal Plan

1. Coal Ash (Generated through

Boiler)

2 - 3 Utilization for as per fly ash rule.

2. ETP sludge 4 - 5 Dispose through TSDF site.

3. Used Oil

(Generated through stand by

DG set)

50 liter/Month Partial used in Boiler and partial sell to

register recycler.

4. Small pieces of leather 2-3 • Smaller particle (saver dust) will sell to feeder and fertilizer

industry.

• Bigger part will sell to end user.

8. The project is covered under category 4"f" of EIA notification, 2006.



1. Approved building plan.

2. NOC granted by UPPCB.

3. Status on air monitoring as per NAAQS standards dated 16/11/2009.

Monitoring data of H2S.

4. Proposal of raw material storage.

5. All services/ environmental facilities should be earmarked on plan layout.

6. OHT to be proposed in rear setback. Plan for same should be submitted.

7. Proposal of diffusers in aeration process.

8. Projection about emission level in operational phase of proposed project.

9. Route map of drain where discharge of tanneries effluent is proposed.

10. Costing of proposed Environmental Management Facilities in the industry.

11. Details of the pollution load at the intermediate and the ultimate discharge

points with flow diagram should be furnished. Scheme for the reduction in

TDS as per the norms of CPCB should be detailed separately with calculation

sheet.

The committee also directed to get a status report regarding construction at site

as required from Member Secretary, UPPCB vide letter dated 26/05/2014 of SEAC.

12- Group Housing “Grand City” at Plot No-04/B.S.-1&5, Sidharth Vihar, Ghaziabad.

Sri Rajesh Agrawal, File No. 2390/ AD-H

The committee noted that the environmental clearance in the matter has already been

issued. However, due to non-updation of status at Secretariat Computer Section, the project

got listed again inadvertently. The committee directed to update the status and delist the matter

from the agenda of the SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

13- Group Housing Project “Golf Vista”, No-3, Sector-M, Sushant City Extension,

Lucknow, U.P. File No. 2242/ DD-Sh.

The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated

13/12/2014 for grant of Terms of Reference, wherein the project proponents were directed

to submit information. The project proponent submitted their information through letter dated 24/12/2014 received in the Directorate on 02/01/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Vinod Tikku, Executive Director along with their

consultant M/s Minmec Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents


1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Golf Vista”, No-3,

Sector-M, Sushant City Extension, Lucknow, U.P. M/s Ansal Properties And

Infrastructure Ltd.


Project Feature Description

Type of Project “Golf Vista” Group Housing (residential building)

Location GH no. 3, Sector-M, Sushant Golf Hi-Tech City (extension area),

Lucknow

Project Proponent M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.

Category of Project Category B, Sl. No. 8(b)

Total Site Area 64,218.54 sq.m. or 15.86 acres

Net Plot Area planned same as above

Ground Coverage Achieved - 7822.436 sq.m. (12.18%)

Permissible - 22,476.49 sq.m. (35% of plot area)

Built-up Area 1,76,460.022 sq.m.

FAR Achieved - 147455.17 sq.m. (@2.75)

Permissible - @2.75

No. of towers 12

No. of floors S+19-24

Maximum height of tallest tower 79.7

No. of Dwelling units 1049

Population 5769 (Residential 5245 + floating 524)

Parking (nos. of ECS) Required = 1.25 cars/unit i.e. 1311; Provided = 1369

Parking location (a) surface = 787; (b) stilt = 134; (c) First basement = 448

Total daily water demand 741.35 KLD (GH, green area)

Fresh water demand 487.7 KLD

Source of Water Ground water through 2 nos. tube well & treated waste water from STP Total Sewage Generation 682.89 KLD

Common STP capacity Centralised STP (23 MLD capacity) of mother city is nearest to this project & will cater to its sewage

Power Requirement 1875 KVA

Source of Power UPPCL Stand by DG sets 1 X 160 KVA and 1X240 KVA

Green area proposed 9632.78 sq. m i.e. 15% of the total plot area, in which 401 trees will be planted

Quantity of solid waste generation 3.56 TPD

Quantity of sludge from STP 0.20 tonnes/day Quantity of e-waste 10.43 kg/day

Quantity of hazardous wastes variable on DG maintenance Cutting/ filling Cutting 3500 cum & filling 2700 cum

Quantity of RW to be harvested 166.23 cum/hr (roof top)

Volume of RWH pits is proposed 14.3 cum Total no of proposed RWH pits 3 RWH structures + 1 surface water body

Depth to water table 6 mbgl

Minutes of 204th


of 62

3. Water calculation details of the project is as follows:

Particulars Total

Population

Water Requirement /Person/Unit Total Water Requirement

Domestic Flushing

(treated

waste

water)

Total Domestic

(LPD)

Flushing

(LPD)

(treated

waste

water)

Total

(LPD)

Residential 5245 90 45 135 472050 236025 708075

Floating 524 15 30 45 15720 7860 23580

Sub Total 487770 243885 731655

Sub Total in KLD 487.78 243.89 731.66

Green Area (sq. m.) in KLD (treated waste water) 9.69

Total Daily Water Requirement (in KLD) 741.35

15% unaccounted for water (UFW) in KLD (emergency use, occasional leakages or

losses--> occasional demand)

110.00

Fire fighting demand [100(P)0.5

] in KLD, P- Population in Thousand (1 time requirement) in KLD (1 time requirement)

240.19

4. Solid waste generation and management details are as follows:

Sl. No. Solid waste Quantity Disposal/ Management

Construction Stage

1 Cutting 3500 2700 cum material shall be required for filling

within the project site.

2 MSW Approx 7.5 kg/d

for @50 labour

Sent to landfill site

Operation Stage

1 STP Sludge 0.20 TPD Used as manure after composting

2 Municipal Solid Waste 3.57 TPD • Segregation at source into (i) biodegradable, (ii) recyclable and (iii) non-biodegradable

categories

• Organic waste shall be utilized for preparation of manure by composting

• Recyclable material shall be sold for recycling to authorized vendors.

• The non compostable and non recyclable

material shall be put into landfill.

3 e-waste 10.43 kg/day Separate e-waste bin on project site from where

periodic evacuation by authorized vendors

(approved by CPCB).

5. The project proposals are covered under category 8"b" of EIA Notification, 2006, as

amended.

The committee discussed the replies submitted by project proponent and

recommended following TORs and general guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding

the proposals:

Additional TORs

1. Land use approved by the competent authority.

2. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which

environment clearance is sought.

3. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and

topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with

photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background

Minutes of 204th


of 62

information.

4. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.

5. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard

electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.

6. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.

7. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting

landscape plan is to be submitted.

8. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure

covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal

of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.

9. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for

discharge.

10. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central

Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.

11. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,

should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated

water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.

12. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment

facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.

13. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between

habitation and proposed project.

14. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.

15. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.

16. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and

other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.

17. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.

18. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may

be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.

19. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their

disposal.

20. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.

21. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.

22. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the

common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all

effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.

Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.

23. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be

described.

24. Disaster management plan should be prepared.

25. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be

described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.

26. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-

laws or construction manual of the MoEF

27. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be

Minutes of 204th


of 62

clearly mentioned

28. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.

29. Use of local building materials should be described.

30. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack

details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.

31. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.

32. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources

of energy in the light of ECBC code.

33. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project

affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should

be prepared.

34. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for

Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

35. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of

minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need

base assessment study in the study area.

36. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.

37. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of

generated waste water.

38. Project falling with in 05 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not

earmarked.

39. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management

services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water

Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.

40. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to

the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District

Magistrate of related District.

General Guidelines

a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly

attested by Public Notary, stating that:

I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is

proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for

any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project

proponent.”

II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil

construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from

getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing

has not been done, then the same may be deleted).

III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,

enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and

I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to

be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,

if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”

Minutes of 204th


of 62

IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified

under any law.

b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been

complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented

are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted

along with EIA.

c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions

indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,

and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,

so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.

d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA

notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):

Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental

attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.

e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically

mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which

this EIA is prepared.

f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm

along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.

g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated

with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through

which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly

be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th

August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.

h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.

The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be

submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the

information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA.

14- Proposed School DPS-Indrapuram Branch at Khasra No- 851,852-853, Vill-Morta,

Rajnagar Extension, Ghaziabad, U.P. File No. 2248/ AD-Sub


13/12/2014 wherein the project proponents were directed to submit information. The project

proponent submitted their information through letter dated 20/01/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Mahendra Pandey, authorized representative and

consultant of project proponent The proponent, through the documents submitted and the

presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Proposed Higher Secondary School, DPS,

Indrapuram Branch at Khasra No- 851, 852, 853, Vill-Morta, Rajnagar Extension,

Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Nirbhay Realtors Private Limited


Plot area 31931 m

2

Minutes of 204th


of 62

Permissible Ground Coverage 11175.85 m

2

(35%)

Proposed Ground Coverage 6163.403 m

2

(19.3 %)

Permissible FAR 38317.2 m

2

(120)

Proposed FAR 28473.091 m

2

Basement Yes

Built up area 28473.091 m

2

Green Area 16676.658 m

2

(approx. 52 % of plot area)

Population 5050 students; 350 faculty & staff

Water Consumption 320 KLD (243 KLD Domestic + 17 KLD Horticulture + 60 KLD

HVAC)

Waste water 218 KLD

STP Capacity 250 KLD

Treated Wastewater 210 KLD (160 KLD Flushing + 17 KLD Horticulture + 53 KLD

Cooling)

Electricity requirement 2000 kW

DG sets Only for emergency use, (2000 KVA + 250 KVA)

Connectivity Sector Roads, N.H. 58

Solid Waste 1080 kg/day (540 kg Organic + 324 kg recyclable + 216 kg others)

Facilities Cafeteria, medical room, Hobbies Clubs, green space, parks

Parking facility 389 cars; 20 buses on ground + 2-wheelers

Total soil excavation 24,000 m3


amended.

The committee discussed the replies and recommended grant of environmental

clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority earlier and following specific conditions:

1. Off street parking shall be provided within the proponent land to be used for the

purpose of school vans and guardian/teacher vehicles. 2. 2% of total cost of project should be earmarked for CSR activities. A regular

compliance in this regards shall be submitted. The cost of CSR shall not be transferred on students and should be mentioned explicitly in the school brochure.

3. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the roads, parks and common places. 4. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and all side walls shall be undertaken.

5. This environmental clearance issued with respect to the environmental consideration

and it does not mean that State Level Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA)

approved the proposed land use.

6. The height, Construction built up area of proposed construction shall be in accordance

with the existing FSI/FAR norms of the urban local body & it should ensure the same

along with survey number before approving layout plan & before according

commencement certificate to proposed work. Plan approving authority should also

ensure the zoning permissibility for the proposed project as per the approved

development plan of the area.

7. All required sanitary and hygienic measures should be in place before starting

construction activities and to be maintained throughout the construction phase.

8. Project proponent shall ensure completion of STP, MSW disposal facility. green belt

development prior to occupation of the buildings. No physical occupation or allotment will be given unless all above said environmental infrastructure is installed and made

functional including water requirement.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

9. Provision shall be made for the housing of construction labour within the site with all

necessary infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile toilets, mobile

STP, safe drinking water, medical health care, crèche and First Aid Room etc.

10. Adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities should be provided for construction

workers at the site. Provision should be made for mobile toilets. The safe disposal of

wastewater and solid wastes generated during the construction phase should he

ensured. 11. The solid waste generated should be properly collected and segregated. dry/inert solid

waste should be disposed off to the approved sites for land filling after recovering recyclable material.

12. Wet garbage should be treated by Organic Waste Converter and treated waste (manure) should be utilized in the existing premises for gardening. And, no wet

garbage will be disposed outside the premises. Local authority should ensure this. 13. Arrangement shall be made that waste water and storm water do not get mixed.

14. All the topsoil excavated during construction activities should be stored for use in

horticulture / landscape development within the project site.

15. Additional soil for leveling of the proposed site shall be generated within the sites (to

the extent possible) so that natural drainage system of the area is protected and

improved.

16. Green Belt Development shall be carried out considering CPCB guidelines including

selection of plant species and in consultation with the local DFO/ Agriculture Dept.

17. Alstonia tree to be added in list of trees.

18. Effluents from laboratories shall be pre treated before STP upto STPs intake

standards. 19. Disposal of muck during construction phase should not create any adverse effect on

the neighboring communities and be disposed taking the necessary precautions for general safety and health aspects of people, only in approved sites with the approval

of competent authority. 20. Any hazardous waste generated during construction phase should be disposed off as

per applicable rules and norms with necessary approvals of the Maharashtra Pollution

Control Board.

21. The diesel generator sets to be used during construction phase should be low sulphur

diesel type and should conform to Environments (Protection) Rules prescribed for air

and noise emission standards.

22. Vehicles hired for bringing construction material to the site should be in good

condition and should have a pollution check certificate and should conform to

applicable air and noise emission standards and should be operated only during

nonpeak hours.

23. Ready mixed concrete must be used in building construction.

24. The approval of competent authority shall be obtained for structural safety of the buildings due to any possible earthquake, adequacy of fire fighting equipments etc. as

per National Building Code including measures from lighting. 25. The ground water level and its quality should be monitored regularly in consultation

with Ground Water Authority. 26. Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points from the roads adjoining the

proposed project site must be avoided. Parking should be fully internalized and no public space should be utilized.

27. The building should have adequate distance between them to allow movement of fresh air and passage of natural light, air and ventilation.

28. In the case of any change (s) in the scope of the project, the project would require a

fresh appraisal by this Department.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

29. A separate environment management cell with qualified staff shall be set up for

implementation of the stipulated environmental safeguards.

30. Separate funds shall be allocated for implementation of environmental protection

measures/EMP along with item-wise breaks-up. These cost shall be included as part

of the project cost.

15- Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd at Bhartiagram, Gajraula, Amroha File

No. 2537/ SPO-V

The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 13/12/2014 for grant of Terms of Reference, wherein the project proponents were directed

to submit information. The project proponent submitted their information through letter dated 20/01/2015 received in the Directorate on 30/01/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri Arun Kumar Arya, authorized representative along

with their consultant M/s Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the

documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd. Situated

at Bhartiagram, District-Amroha, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh.


Particulars Area (sq. m) Percentage (%)

Plant Area, Office Area ( all covered area) 9275 31.70

Paved Area ( Road, Corridor, Parking and drainage) 6000 20.51

Green Belt Area 9747.4 33.31

Open Area 4237.3 14.48

Total Plot area 29259.77 100


Particulars Details

Project Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd.

Location Bhartiagram, District-Amroha, Gajraula-244223, Uttar Pradesh

Category “B” of 5 (f) of EIA notification 2006 and its subsequent

amendments.

Total Land Area 7.23 acre or 29,259.77 sqmts (JACPL Polymer section)

Water Requirement Total Water demand will be 83 KLD (82 industrial and 1 KLD

domestic)

Source of water Water requirement for the proposed project will be sourced from

Jubilant Life science unit

Man Power Total number = 25 persons will be employed

Power Demand 3000 kW per day

Power will be sourced from Cogeneration power plant of Jubilant

Life Science Limited.

End Use Chewing gum industry; as emulsifier in beverages; also used in ink,

paint, varnish, adhesive, packaging, and other non-food items.

4. Raw material details is as follows:

S. no. Particular Quantity (TPA/TPD/kg.)

1 Gum Rosin 6000 TPA/18 TPD

2 Glycerol 700 TPA/ 2 TPD

3 TPP (Catalyst) 6 TPA/ 18 Kg/day

5. Daily fresh water demand is 83 KLD (Industrial purpose 82 KLD, Domestic purpose

01 KLD). Water demand of the industry will be sourced from Jubilant Life Science

Ltd.

6. Water from cooling tower will be in continuous loop during the process. Wastewater

generated from domestic purpose will be to the tune of 0.5 KLD, which will be

Minutes of 204th


of 62

treated in the existing STP. The changes will be localized and no change in the

physical environment will be observed as zero discharge will be maintained. 7. Solid waste generation details is as follows:

S.No. Waste Description Category as per

HWMR rules

Qty generated

/Annum/day

Unit Method of

disposal

1 GI barrel waste (Metal

Scrap)

-- 600 Kg/day To be sent to

Market

2 Bag waste/ Paper waste -- 3.2 kg/ Day To be sent to

Market

3 Ethyl acetate Waste from reactor cleaning

20.2 1200 KL/annum To be sent to authorized

Recyclers

8. The project proposals are covered under category 5"f" of EIA Notification, 2006, as

amended.


recommended following TORs for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:

Additional TORs 1. Executive summary of the project.

2. Project location and plant layout. 3. Promoters and their back ground.

4. Regulatory framework.

5. Base line data given needs to be elaborated.

6. Data for the stack emission, fugitive emission; water requirement and water balance

chart; waste water generation, treated effluent quality, re-utilization and disposal of

solid/hazardous waste for existing unit.

7. A map indicating location of the project and distance from severely polluted area.

8. Infrastructure facilities including power sources.

9. Total cost of the project along with total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures.

10. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.

11. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10 km radius. 12. Location of National Park/Wild Life Sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 05 km radius.

13. Details of the total land and break-up of the land use for green belt and other uses. 14. List of the products along with the production capacities.

15. Detailed list of raw material required and source, mode of storage and transportation.

16. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reaction and process flow

chart.

17. Site-specific micro-metrological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly

wind speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.

18. Ambient air quality monitoring at 6 locations within the study area of 5 km., aerial

coverage from project site as per NAAQES notified on 16th September, 2009.

Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction. 19. One season site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative

humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except monsoon) for PM10, SO2, NOx including HC and VOCs should be collected. The

monitoring station should take into account the pre-dominant wind direction,

population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests. Data for water and

noise monitoring should also be included.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

20. Air pollution control measures proposed for the effective control of gaseous emission

within permissible limits.

21. Name of all the solvents to be used in the process and details of solvent recovery

systems.

22. Design details of ETP, incinerator, boiler, scrubbers/bag filters etc.

23. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation measures plan.

24. Action plan to control ambient air quality as per NAAQES standards notified by the Ministry on 16th September, 2009.

25. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources.

26. Water balance chart including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged.

27. Action plan for ‘Zero’ discharge of effluent should be included. 28. Ground water quality monitoring minimum at 6 locations should be carried out.

Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area and ecological status

(Terrestrial and Aquatic).

29. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage, utilization and disposal

particularly related to the hazardous waste.

30. Action plan for management of fly ash generated from boiler should be included. Tie-

up or agreement with brick manufacturers to be provided.

31. Precautions to be taken during storage and transportation of hazardous chemicals

should be clearly mentioned and incorporated.

32. A copy of the Memorandum of understanding signed with cement manufacturing

indicating clearly that they will utilized all the organic solid waste generated.

33. A copy of ‘Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with coal supplier for

imported coal and brick manufactures for management of fly ash.

34. Authorization/Membership for the disposal of liquid effluent in CETP and solid/hazardous waste in TSDF, if any.

35. Risk assessment for storage for chemicals/solvents. 36. Material safety data sheet of chemicals to be submitted.

37. An action plan to develop green belt in 33% area. 38. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site should be included to

harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water.

39. Details of occupational health programme. To which chemicals, workers are exposed

directly or indirectly:

a. Whether these chemicals are within threshold Limit values (TLV)/ Permissible

Exposure Levels as per ACGIH recommendation.

b. What measures company has taken to keep these chemicals within PEL/TLV.

c. How the workers are evaluated concerning their exposure to chemicals during pre-

placement and periodical medical monitoring.

d. What are onsite and offsite emergency plan during chemical disaster.

e. Liver function tests (LFT) during preplacement and periodical examination.

f. Details of occupational health surveillance programme.

40. Socio-economic development activities should be in place.

41. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines.

42. Detailed Environment Management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to details of air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency,

responsibility and time bound implementation plan for mitigation measures should be provided.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

43. EMP should include the concept of water minimization, recycle/reuse/recover

techniques, Energy conservation and natural resource conservation.

44. Corporate Environmental Responsibility

a) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board

of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

b) Does the Environmental Policy prescribe for standard operating process/procedures to

bring into focus any infringement/ deviation/violation of the environmental or forest norms/conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

45. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions. Details

of this system may be given. 46. Does the company have a system of reporting of noncompliance / violations of

environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or stakeholders at large? The reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA

report.

47. Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any

court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.

48. Public hearing to be conducted and issues raised and commitments made by the

project proponent on the same should be included in EIA/EMP report in the form of

tabular chart with financial budget for complying with the commitments made.

16- Proposed 227.40 acre OPUS Integrated Township near Ghaziabad. Mr. A

Raghunath, General Manager, H-87, Ist Floor, Sector-63, NOIDA. File No. 1312/

DD-Y

The project proponent informed the committee that:

1. Recommendations for environmental clearance of the project were made by the

committee in its meeting dated 16/07/2014.

2. The Authority in its meeting dated 12/08/2014 made following observations:

"

The SEIAA gone through the recommendations of the SEAC regarding the matter and

examined the respective project file. The SEIAA directed the project proponent to-

1. Submit plan for LIG and EWS housing as per Local Development Authority bye-

laws.

2. As under the heading of "Environmental Sensitivity" of from-1 it is mentioned

that there is a natural lake within 15 K.M. of the proposed project boundary.

Submit exact location of the lake on the map with reference to project site with

estimated impacts with proper drainage plan mentioning its final disposal.

3. As the project proponent has submitted that revised layout plan with increased

green belt up to 21% from of 15% map/plan showing 21% green belt should be

submitted.

4. Explain whether the project is submitted for infrastructure development only or it

includes development of all facilities i.e. residential/commercial/facility areas etc.

5. Submit a copy of Land allotment letter in the name of owner of land.

"

3. The project proponent submitted their reply through his letter dated 18-09-214. The

project proponent letter dated 18-09-2014 was put up and discussed in the SEIAA meeting dated 03/12/2014. The SEIAA observed that the information submitted by

Minutes of 204th


of 62

the project proponent is very short and not clear. The SEIAA also observed that there

is a natural lake (waster body) adjacent to the project as informed by project

proponent however, no specific details have been submitted by the project proponent.

Hence, the authority directed to refer the matter back to the committee to appraised

the matter in view of issues raised by the authority and to considered sensitivity

around the project.

The committee discussed the matter in light of issues raised by SEIAA and directed the proponent to make a presentation on the queries raised by the SEIAA.

The proponent requested to appear alongwith presentation in next meeting. The committee agreed to include the matter in next SEAC meeting. Copy of reply to be

submitted also to all members of the committee.

17- Mixed use IT/ITES Project “Auriel Towne” at Plot No-31, Sector-KP-V, Greater

Noida, G B Nagar, Sri Rajneesh Gupta, Director, H-38, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. File

No. 2204/ AD-Sub.


15/11/2014 wherein the project proponents were directed to submit information. The project

proponent submitted their information through letter dated 10/12/2014.

A presentation was made by Shri K.C. Tripathi, authorized representative of project

proponent along with their consultant M/s Ascenso Management And Consulting Services

Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,

informed the committee that:-

1- The environmental clearance is sought for Mixed use IT/ITES Project “Auriel

Towne” at Plot No-31, Sector-KP-V, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Shubh Advisors Pvt.

Ltd.

2- Detailed area statement of the project is as follows:

S. No Particulars Area (m2

) In percentage

1 Total Plot Area 40,500.00 --

2 Permissible Ground Coverage 12,150.00 30% of Plot Area

3 Proposed Ground Coverage 11,956.25 29.52 % of Plot Area

4 Permissible FAR @ 2 81,000.00 200 % of Total Plot Area

5 5% FAR for Green Building 4,050.00 5% of Permissible FAR

6 Proposed FAR Area @1.99

· Facility Area

· IT Area

· Commercial Area

· Residential Area

80,933.40

10,464.61

46,402.82

12,016.59

12,049.00

199% of Total Plot Area


57.33 %of Proposed FAR

14.84 % of Proposed FAR


7 Service Area

• IT/ITES Area/ Commercial Area/Facility Area

• Residential

8,150.10

6,392.77

1,757.33

10.06% of Permissible FAR

78.43% of service Area

21.56% of service Area

8 Free FAR Area 1,653.48 2% of Permissible FAR

9 Stilt Area 305.14 --

10 Basement Area

· Basement 1

· Basement 2

54367.60

34511.59

19856.01

--

11 Built-up Area (5+6+7+8+9+10) 1,49,459.74 --

12 Open area 28,543.75 70.47 % of plot area

13 Landscape Area 14,859.48 52 % of open area

14 Height of Highest Tower 99.75 m --

Minutes of 204th


of 62

3- Project details are as follows:

Name and Location of the Project Mixed Use IT/ITES Project “Auriel Towne”, at Plot no. 31,

KP- V, Greater Noida, Distt- Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.

Developers of the project M/s. Shubh Advisors Pvt. Ltd.

Total Plot Area 40,500 m

2

.

Built-up Area (Proposed FAR + Basement

area + Services area) 1,49,459.749 m

2

.

Total Water Consumption 505 KLD

Total Freshwater Requirement 184 KLD

(Domestic water = 179 KLD + Swimming Pool water = 5

KLD)

Power Requirement 7.5 MVA Says 7500 KVA

Power Backup 6 DG Sets of total capacity of 8250 KVA

(2 x 1250+ 3x 1500) 1 DG Sets of 1250 KVA is on standby

Total Parking provided 1635 ECS

Solid Waste to be Generated 6089.25 kg/day

No. of RWH Pits 16

4- Population details of the project are as follows:

S. No. Types No of unit / Area in m sq Person Per Unit Population

1 Commercial Area 8,516.879 1 person/ 6 sq m 1419

2 Facility Area 10,464.614 1 person/ 6 sq m 1744

3 IT Block 46,402.82 1 person/10 sq m 4640

4 Group Housing 39 unit 4.5 175.5

5 Villas Type 1 50 unit 7 350

6 Villas Type 2 10 unit 7 70

7 Studio Apartments 96 unit 3 288

8 Visitor

(10 % of overall Project)

868

Total Population 9,555

5- Water calculation details are as follows: S. N. Description Population Unit water

consumption

(liters)

Total water

required (KLD)

Water

requirement for

Domestic Use

(KLD)

Flushing

Water

(KLD)

A Residential

Population

883 86 75.93 57.39 18.54

B Staff/Servants 7803 45 351.13 117.04 234.09

C Visitor 868 15 13.02 5.20 7.812

D Swimming Pool --- --- 5 --- ---

E Horticulture

(14859.48 m2

)

--- 1 liter 14.85 --- ---

F DG Set Cooling

(3*1250+ 3*1500)

--- 0.9 kVA/h 45 --- ---

Total 505 KLD 179 KLD 260

KLD

6- Solid waste calculation details are as follows: Category of Solid Waste Waste Generation Average Occupancy Waste

generated

Residential 0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 0.45 1751 787.95

Commercial Area 0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 1.5 1419 2128.5

Facility Area 0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 1.5 1744 2616

IT Area 0.05 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 0.12 4640 556.8

Total waste generated 6,089.25

7- The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

The committee discussed the replies and recommended grant of environmental

clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority

earlier and following specific conditions:


the premises. 2. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more

capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for

designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization.

3. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken with regular testing and monitoring

of treated water.

4. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to


users.

5. Copy of Green building Certificate to be submitted regarding extra FAR.

6. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of

Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority.

7. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as

amended). 8. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan

submitted.

9. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% Solar lighting is to be

provided in the common areas/common stairs.

10. Parking guideline as per Greater Noida Development Authority should be followed.

Parking for disabled persons should be explored.

11. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

12. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from

the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

13. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done

only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after


14. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets

capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building. 15. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP

to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines. 16. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.

17. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made. 18. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of

residents. 19. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be



21. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be

restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.

22. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any


Minutes of 204th


of 62




construction.



27. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc. Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including


18- BEAVE HEART Raj Nagar (Housing Complex) Khasra N0- 1083, Vill-Noor Nagar,

Ghaziabad, U.P.Sri J.P. Malpani, Vice President, B-49, Sector-67, G B Nagar,

NOIDA, U.P. File No. 1667/JDCA-S



proponent.

19- Group Housing at Khasra No-239 & 250, ward Mohanlalganj, Madharmau Village,

Sultanpur Road, Lucknow. Sri Sarvesh Kumar, 8, J C Bose Marg, Hazaratganj,

Lucknow. File No. 2199/ AD-H


case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project proponent.

20- Group Housing “Speed Way Avenue” at GH-A2,Jaypee Sports City, Sector 25,SDZ,

Yamuna Expressway Greater Noida. Mr Sanjeev Sharma,A-14,Kailash Colony,

Near Metro Station, New Delhi. File No. 2251/DD-DS

The committee noted that the reply in the matter has been submitted on 18/02/2015 hence the matter should be taken on its chronology. Accordingly the matter is delisted from

the agenda of the meeting and should be taken up as per chronology.

21- Special Development Zone, Sec.125 Yamuna Exp.Way, Noida, G.B. Nagar. Mr

Sameer Gaur, M.D. & CEO,JPSK Sports Pvt. Ltd. Sector-128, Noida. File No. 1806/

DD-Y



proponent.

22- “Awadh Vihar Bhoomi Vikas Evam Grahisthan Yojna, Vill-Devamau, Sarsavan,

Barauli Khalilabae, Brauna, Ghusval Kalan, Hariharpur, Sevain, Ahmamau,

Sulatanpur Road, Lucknow. U.P. Avas Evm Vikas Parishad Office Complex, IIIrd

Floor, Sec-9A, Vrinavan Yojna, Lucknow. File No. 2278/ AD-H


21/10/2014 wherein the committee made following observation:

Minutes of 204th


of 62

"The committee noted that the project is covered under category 8 "b" with plot area

572.961 ha. The committee after going though the document submitted by the project

proponent deliberated that the project involves a large area and may include sensitivities

which should be explained through DPR of the project. The project proponent should be

directed to submit the detailed project report of the project so that the terms of reference may

be issued in view of details of the project. "

The project proponent submitted their information through letter dated 24/12/2014. A

presentation was made by Shri A.K. Mishra, Executive Engineer along with their consultant

M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted

and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1- The environmental clearance is sought for “Awadh Vihar Bhoomi Vikas Evam

Grahisthan Yojna, Vill-Devamau, Sarsavan, Barauli Khalilabae, Brauna, Ghusval

Kalan, Hariharpur, Sevain, Ahmamau, Sulatanpur Road, Lucknow. M/s U.P. Avas

Evm Vikas Parishad.

2- Area detail of the project is as follows:

Land Uses Pocket-1 Pocket-2 Total

Area

(Acre)

Total

%

Total

Area

(Hac)

Area

(Acre)

% Area

(Hac)

Area

(Acre)

% Area

(Hac)

Residential

Area

688.97 55.66 278.82 60.56 34.06 24.51 749.53 52.95 303.33

Commercial

Area

62.44 5.04 25.268 4.99 2.81 2.019 67.43 4.76 27.288

Institutional

Area

24.565 1.98 9.94 27.787 15.63 11.245 52.352 3.69 21.186

Green Area 229.005 18.5 92.67 40.1835 22.6

16.262

269.188 19.02

108.938

Road Area 194.20 15.69 78.59 26.26 14.77 10.626 220.46 15.57 89.217

Village Abadi

Area

38.70 3.13 15.66 18.03 10.14 7.296 56.73 4.01 22.958

Total Area 1237.88 100 500.945 177.81 100 71.958 1415.69 100 572.916

3- Proposed facilities are as follows:

S. No. Facilities Numbers

1 Nursery School 85

2 Primary School 50

3 J. High School 33

4 Inter College 24

5 Degree College 3

6 Police Station 4

7 Police Chawki 10

8 Electrical Sub Station 10

9 Telephone Exchange 2

10 N.H. Play Area 1

11 General Hospital 2

12 Health Centre 12

13 Community Centre 10

14 B.K. & P.G. 6

15 U.G.R. 9

Minutes of 204th


of 62

16 Fire Station 1

17 Zonal Sport Centre 3

4- Salient features details are as follows:

• Total Expected Population of Township: 511854 Persons

• Source of Water Supply: 12 nos. of Bore wells (18”)

• Total Consumption of Water: 44.40 MLD

• Waste Water Treatment: STP of 45 MLD capacity (split in 4.5 -5.0 MLD STP s) &

ETP of 70 KLD Capacity

• Total No. of Rain Water Harvesting Pits: 102 pits

• Total Municipal Solid Waste generated: 318.885 MTD

• Total Biomedical Waste generated: 112 kg/ day

• The water shall be withdrawn from 12 nos. of bore wells 18”

• The one time water requirement for firefighting : 2.49 MLD

5- Population details are as follows:

S.

No.

Land Use Pocket 1 Pocket 2 Total Area

(Acre)

Total

Area

(Hec.)

Population

Density

assumed

(Persons/

hac)

Total

Population

1 Residential 688.97 60.56 749.53 303.33 1625 492912

2 Institutional 24.565 27.787 52.352 21.186 250 5297

3 Commercial 62.44 4.99 67.43 27.29 500 13645

Total 511854

6- Water requirement details are as follows:

S.

No.

Location Per Capita

Water Demand

(LPCD)

Population/

Area (Sq. m.)

Total Water

Requirement

(KLD)

Waste Discharge

(KLD)

1 Residential 86 492912 42390.43 33912.35

2 Commercial 45 13645 614.025 491.22

3 Institutional 45 5297 238.365 190.69

Total Domestic Water Requirement 43242.82 34594.26

4 General Hospital 340 200 68.00 54.4

7 Horticulture &

Landscaping 1 l/ m

2

1089378.94 1089.379 NIL

Total Water Requirement & Discharge 44400.199 34648.66

7- Municipal soild waste generation details are as follows:

Type of Waste Colour of Bins Category Disposal Total Waste (Kg/day)

Organics

(vegetable leaves

& grass)

Green Bio Degradable Municipal Solid

Waste Site

175386.77

Paper/ Plastic/

Glass /ceramics/

Metal/

Blue Recyclable Approved Recycler 41455.056

Stones, Ashes &

Miscellaneous

Grey Non-Bio degradable Municipal Solid waste

Site

102043.21

Therefore, total expected MSW waste = 318.885 MTPD.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

8- The project proposals are covered under category 8"b" of EIA Notification, 2006.


recommended following TORs and general guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding

the proposals:

Additional TORs

1. No. of trees to be felled, if any. Status of permission of Forest Department in this

regard.

2. Land use approved by the competent authority.

3. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which

environment clearance is sought.

4. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and

topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with

photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background

information.

5. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.

6. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard

electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.

7. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.

8. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting

landscape plan is to be submitted.

9. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure

covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal

of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.

10. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for

discharge.

11. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central

Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.

12. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,

should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated

water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.

13. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment

facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.

14. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between

habitation and proposed project.

15. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.

16. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.

17. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and

other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.

18. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.

19. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may

be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.

20. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their

disposal.

21. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

22. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.

23. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the

common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all

effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.

Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.

24. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be

described.

25. Disaster management plan should be prepared.

26. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be

described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.

27. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-

laws or construction manual of the MoEF

28. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be

clearly mentioned

29. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.

30. Use of local building materials should be described.

31. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack

details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.

32. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.

33. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources

of energy in the light of ECBC code.

34. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project

affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should

be prepared.

35. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for

Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

36. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of

minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need

base assessment study in the study area.

37. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.

38. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of

generated waste water.

39. Project falling with in 05 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not

earmarked.

40. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management

services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water

Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.

41. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to

the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District

Magistrate of related District.

General Guidelines

a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly

attested by Public Notary, stating that:

Minutes of 204th


of 62

I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is

proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for

any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project

proponent.”

II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil

construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from

getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing

has not been done, then the same may be deleted).

III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,

enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and

I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to

be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,

if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”

IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified

under any law.

b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been

complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented

are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted

along with EIA.

c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions

indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,

and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,

so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.

d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA

notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):

Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental

attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.

e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically

mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which

this EIA is prepared.

f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm

along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.

g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated

with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through

which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly

be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th

August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.

h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.

The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be

submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the

information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

23- es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23----01010101----2222015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus 015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus 015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus 015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus gsrqAgsrqAgsrqAgsrqA

The committee was informed that M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Lucknow has submitted a letter dated 23/01/2015 through which they have informed that:

1. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, is proposing to set up a new Lube Blending

cum filling plant at Plot no.: 491, 492 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500,

501,502,503,504,505Kha, 506,507,508 & 510 Village: Amousi Distt:

Lucknow. In this plant they will prepare different grades of Lubricants by

mixing of base oil with additives.

2. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd want to inform SEIAA that all the products

i.e. Base oil, Additives and Lubricants are non- Hazardous in nature. They

have attached project report with detailed products specifications & operation

design basis and communication from our Quality Control Department

regarding nature of the products proposed to be handled at Lube plant. They

have also received NOC for the project from State Pollution Control Board

(UPPCB) copy of the same.

3. As per point 6(b) of schedule attached notification issued by Ministry of Environment & Forests dated 14.09.2006, hazardous petroleum products fall

under Category B . Since the product which M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd are proposing to handle is non-hazardous in nature so they need SEIAA

guidance whether Environmental Clearance for the project is applicable for their project.

4. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd has attached the details of the project with process flow diagram Environment management plan for your kind reference.

The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that project proponent

should go through the provisions of EIA Notification, 2006 and should decide whether they require a clearance this activity. It is necessary to submit a project in

prescribed form-1 and other documents to SEIAA for making any decision in this regards which has not been submitted by the project proponent. However, the

committee directed that Secretariat examine the matter on the basis of provisions of

EIA Notification and put up a note for Authority.

24- es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20----01010101----2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s 2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s 2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s 2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus gsrqAtkus gsrqAtkus gsrqAtkus gsrqA

The committee noted that M/s SKV Infotech through their letter dated 20/01/2014 has submitted that they have applied for environmental clearance of Institutional Complex

"Wisten Park" at plot no. 17, knowledge park-V, Greater Noida on 13/10/2014 and has

not been appraised till date. They have also submitted that the project has also been

submitted for green building certification of IGBC hence, they should be given priority in

appraisal as per MoEF OM dated 10/05/2011.

The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that matters at SEAC are being

considered in chronological order and the said matter shall also be taken up

chronologically. However, the committee is trying its level best to increase the frequency

of meetings so that the pendency can be disposed at the earliest. The committee also

deliberated that priority shall be given to only those project which have applied alongwith

precertification of Green Building. In present matter no precertification has been

submitted hence, the project proponent can not claim for priority on the basis of mere

submission of application to IGBC.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

25- Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29----01010101----2015 ij lfef2015 ij lfef2015 ij lfef2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus r }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus r }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus r }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus gsrqAgsrqAgsrqAgsrqA

The committee was informed that Shri Sanjay Srivastava, Advocate, High Court

through his letter dated 29/01/2015 has legally advised that project proposal "Arsha

Sumangalam", 14/GH-13-C, Sector-14, Vrindavan Yojna, Lucknow is pending at SEIAA

since 17/07/2014 for environmental clearance and has not cleared it in statutory period.

they has requested to kindly take up the project in the said matter at the earliest in the next

meeting, failure to which will lead appropriate actions against SEAC.

The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that the matters at SEAC are

being considered in chronological order and the said matter shall also be taken up

chronologically. However, the committee is trying its level best to increase the frequency

of meetings so that the pendency can be disposed at the earliest.

26- Expansion & Modification of Township “Gaur City” at Plot no. GH-01, Sector-4,

Noida. M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 305, Arunachal, 19

Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. File No. 2327/ AD-H

The committee noted that M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. submitted an

application dated 10/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance for Expansion &

Modification of Township “Gaur City” at Plot no. GH-01, Sector-4, Noida.

A presentation was made by Shri Devendra Bhandari, representative of project

proponent. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,


1. Environmental clearance for Tonwhsip "Gaur City" at plot no. GH-01, Sector-4,

Greater Noida was issued through SEIAA letter no. 470/SEAC/531/2010/AAS dated

11/01/2011. Now modification and expansion of the proposed integrated township is

submitted for environmental clearance.

2. The environmental clearance is sought for Expansion & Modification of Township

“Gaur City” at Plot no. GH-01, Sector-4, Noida. M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure

Pvt. Ltd.


DESCRIPTION OF AREA AREA (Sqm) % OF AREA FOR

DEVELOPMENT

Total Area of Scheme 5,03,216 100.00

Sold Land 60947.08 12.10

Balance Area 4,42,268.92 87.90

DESCRIPTION OF AREA AREA (Hectare) % OF AREA FOR

DEVELOPMENT

Residential Land Use, including Facilities

i.e. Schools, Health and Community

Centers, etc.

19.07 43.17

Institutional Area 2.52 5.70

Commercial Land Use 5.03 11.32

Parks, Open Spaces and Roads 17.61 39.81

Total 44.23 100.00

Minutes of 204th


of 62

4. Comparative Statement of the project is as follows:

S No. Details Previous EC Proposed

Modifications

Remarks

1 Plot Area (sqmt) 5,03,216.00 4,42,268.92 Part Residential Plot Sold

2 FAR (sqmt) 2.750 3.675 [Purchasable

(0.75 & IGBC

0.175)]

Bye-Laws Revised

3 Built up Area (sqmt) 12,63,072. 13,66,268 FAR Increased

(Built-up area increased due to

increase in FAR: from 2.75 to

3.675)

4 Population Density

(PPH)

1650 2100 Bye-Laws Revised

5 Population 41515 40039 Part Residential Plot Sold

6 Category 8 (b) 8 (b) Un-changed

7 No. of dwelling units (DUs)

8303 8898 -

8 Maximum Height of the

building (in mtrs.)

150 150 Airport NOC obtained

9 Area for the Green 45% 45% Un-changed

10 Recycled waste water

requirement for

horticulture

1.4 lt./m2 1 lt./m2 By – Laws Revised

5. Comparative salient features details are as follows:

Details Previous EC Proposed Modifications

Parking 10644 ECS 8758 ECS as per GNIDA

Power

requirement

38.40 MVA from Grid Power 43.30 MVA from Grid Power

Power requirement has increased due to increase in FAR.

Power back-up Provide Backup DG Sets as per

requirement

Provide Backup DG Sets as per requirement

Water

requirement,

source &

Sewage

Disposal

Fresh water : 6950 KLD, Greater Noida

Water Supply (@ 135 lpcd)

Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 KLD

(From Greater Noida CSTP)

Total water requirement : 8450 KLD

Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to

Greater Noida CSTP

Sewage Flow: 5560 KLD


Water Supply (@ 86 lpcd)

Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 + 960 KLD



Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to Greater

Noida CSTP


Power requirement

OLD REQUIREMENT : 38,450 KVA REVISED REQUIREMENT : 43,295 KVA

Source of power State Grid Power

Power Backup (16x600 KVA, 4x500 KVA, 4x750 KVA)

DG Sets are provided as per requirement for backup in Commercial, Institutional &

Residential Areas and common facilities only.

No of RWH Pits 42 Pits


Total Builtup Area Detail

S.No Description Plot Area FAR FAR

Area

*Basement

Area

15%

prescribed

FAR

Total

Built up

Area

Sqmt Sqmt

1 GC-1 47370.00 3.675 174085 37896 17408 229389

a) Milk Booth 200.00 1.000 200 20 220

b) Nursery School 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450

Minutes of 204th


of 62

c) Convenient shops 2000.00 2.000 4000 1600 400 6000

2 GC-4 26600.00 3.675 97755 21280 9776 128811

a) Community center 2300.00 1.500 3450 1840 345 5635

b) Nursing home 3000.00 2.750 8250 2400 825 11475

c) Nursery School 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450

d) Milk Booth 200.00 1.000 200 20 220

e) Dispensary 500.00 1.500 750 75 825

3 GC-5 35058.45 3.675 128840 28046.76 12884 169771

a) Nursing home 2000.00 2.750 5500 1600 550 7650

b) Milk Booth 200.00 1.000 200 20 220

c) Nursery school / Cretch 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450

4 GC-6/ I 27752.92 3.675 101992 22202.336 10199 134394

b) Nursery School 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450

5 GC-7 53879.55 3.675 198007 43103.64 19801 260912

a) Sen Sec School 10000.00 8000 0 8000

b) Nursery School 2000.00 1.500 3000 1600 300 4900

c) Milk Booth 400.00 1.000 400 40 440

d) Community center 5700.00 1.500 8550 4560 855 13965

e) Convenient shops 6000.00 2.000 12000 4800 1200 18000

6 C-1 - A

a) Commercial 23323.60 4.200 97959 18658.88 9796 126414

7 C-1 - B

a) Commercial 23000.00 4.200 96600 18400 9660 124660

8 C-2

a) Commercial 3998.00 4.200 16792 3198.4 1679 21669

9 IST-1

a) Institutional 15660.00 2.750 43065 12528 4307 59900

10 IST-2

a) Institutional 500.00 1.000 500 400 50 950

11 IST-3

a) Institutional 9000.00 1.500 13500 7200 1350 22050

Total 304643 1021595 242514 102159 1366268

Note : *Approx. basement area considered as 80% of plot area

*Approx prescribed FAR area considered as 10% of FAR area

7. Water requirement details are as follows:

Total Water Demand Old Requirement Revised Requirement

8450 KLD 5447 KLD

Source of water Greater Noida Water Supply

(Treated effluent will meet around 18% of water demand of the project)

Requirement Quantity

(kld)

Domestic 3443

Institutional 113

Community Center 37

Commercial 233

Schools 115

Nursing Home 6

Total 3947

Including Horticulture, Cooling etc. 1500 (Kld)

5447

Source Quantity (kld)

Minutes of 204th


of 62

Fresh Water (Water

Supply)

3947

Reuse of treated sewage

effluent from Greater

Noida CSTP

1500 KLD

(Horticulture) + 960 KLD (Flushing)

(As per availability)

Total 5447


Old Solid Waste Generation - 22567 Kg/ day

Revised Solid Waste generation - 21829 Kg/ day

Quantity of solid waste generated has reduced due to decrease in population

MSW Generated Rate Unit Population Waste Generation

(Kg/Day)

Residential Area 0.5 Kg/day 40039 20020

Dispensary 1.125 Kg/day 50 56

Commercial Area 0.2 Kg/day 5033 1006

Schools / Institutions 0.1 Kg/day 4966 497

Community Center 0.1 Kg/day 2500 250

Total MSW Generated 21829

Total Population 52588

Biomedical Waste from Dispensary 0.375 Kg/day 50 18.75

9. The project is covered under category 8"b" of EIA notification, 2006.




permitted.

2. All approved maps/services plan.

3. Give no construction certificate with respect to proposed

increase/modification.

4. Parking plan.

5. Area details as per proposed land use is to be submitted.

6. Various land uses with area analysis.

7. Affidavit regarding installation of organic waste convertor.



9. Proposal for water body for rain waer harvesting as per norms.




12. 2% Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary

provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.




ownership.

15. Permission of municipal authority for water supply and discharge of waste

water into municipal sewer/drain.

Minutes of 204th


of 62




related papers.

18. Copy of letter from Noida Development. AUTH. regarding providing water supply.

19. A definite proposal the treatment and recycling of a portion of the domestic effluents

in order to reduce the fresh water load should be incorporated and detailed submitted.


27- Modification and Expansion of Group Housing Project of “Gaur City-2” at GH-03,

Sector-16C, Greater Noida. M/s Gaursons Promoters Pvt. Ltd. 305, Arunachal, 19

Barakhamba Road, New Delhi File No. 2328/ DD-DS

The committee noted that M/s Gaursons Promoters Pvt. Ltd. submitted an application

dated 10/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance for Modification and

Expansion of Group Housing Project of “Gaur City-2” at GH-03, Sector-16C, Greater Noida.

A presentation was made by Shri Devendra Bhandari, representative of project

proponent. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,


1. Environmental clearance for Township "Gaur City-2" at plot no. GH-03, Sector-16C,

Greater Noida was issued through SEIAA letter no. 1077/SEAC/607/20101/DDS

dated 04/05/2011. Now modification and expansion of the proposed township is

submitted for environmental clearance.

2. The environmental clearance is sought for Modification and Expansion of Group

Housing Project of “Gaur City-2” at GH-03, Sector-16C, Greater Noida. M/s

Gaursons Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

3. Comparative area details of the project is as follows:

S. NO. DETAILS PREVIOUS EC PROPOSED

EXPANSION &

MODIFICATION

REMARKS

1 Plot Area (Sqm) 413261.11 272968.60 Part Residential Plot Sold

2 FAR (Sqm) 1111078.650(2.750) 1003160.90 (3.675) By – Laws Revised

[3.675 (Purchasable (0.75

& IGBC 0.175)]

3 Built up Area (Sqm) 11,36,468 13,63,695 FAR Increased

(Built-up area increased

due to increase in FAR:

from 2.75 to 3.675)

4 Population Density

(PPH)

1650 2100 By – Laws Revised

5 Residential

Population

68190 57326 Part Residential Plot Sold

6 Maximum Height of

the building (in

mtrs.)

150 150 Airport NOC obtained

7 Area for the green

belt development

45% 45% Un-changed

8 Recycled waste 1.4 lt./m2 1 lt./m2 By – Laws Revised

Minutes of 204th


of 62

water requirement

for horticulture

9 Category 8’b’ 8’b’ Un-Changed

4. Comparative salient features details of the project is as follows:

Previous EC REVISED DATA

Parking 17484 ECS 12540 ECS

Power

requirement

26.14 MVA from Grid Power and DG

Sets

24.17 MVA from Grid Power and DG Sets

Power Requirement has decreased due to decrease in dwelling units with respect to reduction

in plot area.

Power back-up Backup DG Sets as per requirement Backup DG Sets as per requirement

No of

Dwelling Unit

13638 DUs 12739 DUs

Water

requirement,

source &

Sewage

Disposal


Water Supply

Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 KLD



Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to

Greater Noida CSTP


Fresh water : 5438 KLD, Greater Noida Water

Supply

Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 + 1317 KLD



Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to Greater

Noida CSTP


Water requirement is reduce in revised data due to reduce in population as per decrease in plot

area.

No of RWH

pits 37 Pits


Group Housing BUILT-UP AREA DETAIL

S.No Description Plot Area FAR FAR

Area

*Basement

Area

15%

prescribed

FAR

Total

Built up

Area

Sqmt Sqmt

1 Residential (GC-10,11,12,14,16) 245317.6 3.675 939735 244800 93973 1278508

a) School - 1 Sen Sec School with

three Nursery School

10000.00 13500 4986 1350 19836

b) School - 2 Sen Sec School with

three Nursery School

10000.00 12500 4312 1250 18062

c) Nursery School/Crech 1500 0 150 1650

d) Nursing home 3000.00 2.750 8250 2400 825 11475

e) Religious building 1101.00 2521 881 252 3654

f) Police Chownki & Auto cum Taxi Stand

1050.00 1550 840 155 2545

g) Petrol Pump/Gas Station 2500.00 1250 2000 125 3375

h) Convenient Shops 9554 0 955 10509

i) Milk Booth 800 0 80 880

j) Community Hall 12000 0 1200 13200

Total FAR 272968.60 1003160 260219 100315 1363695

Note

:

*Approx. basement area considered as 80% of plot area

*Approx prescribed FAR area considered as 10% of FAR area

Minutes of 204th


of 62

6. Water requirement details are as follows:

Total Water Demand Old Requirement Revised Requirement

6201 KLD 5438 KLD

Source of water Greater Noida Water Supply

Requirement Qty (kld)

Domestic 4929

Services and Facilities 509

Total 5438

Including Horticulture, Cooling

1500 KLD, Road Washing

6938

Source Qty (kld)

Greater Noida Water Supply 5438

Reuse of treated sewage effluent

from Greater Noida CSTP

1500 + 1317

(As per availability)

Total 6938


Old Waste Generation: 27275 Kg/day

Revised Waste generation: 24960 Kg/day

Quantity of Solid waste generated has reduced due to decrease in total population

MSW Generated From @ Unit Population Waste

Generation

Unit

Residential Area 0.4 Kg/day 57326 22930 Kg/day

Dispensary 1 Kg/day 50 50 Kg/day

Commercial Area 1 Kg/day 960 960 Kg/day

Schools / Institutions 0.1 Kg/day 7500 750 Kg/day

Religious Building 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day

Police Station 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day

Petrol Pump 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day

Community Hall 0.1 Kg/day 2500 250 Kg/day

Milk Booth 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day

Total MSW Generated 24960 Kg/day

Total Poplulation 68536

Biomedical Waste from Dispensary 0.375 Kg/day 18.75 Kg/day

(approx.)





permitted.

2. All approved maps/services plan.

3. Give no construction certificate with respect to proposed

increase/modification.

4. Parking plan.

5. Various land uses with area analysis.

6. Affidavit regarding installation of organic waste convertor.



8. Proposal for water body for rain waer harvesting as per norms.




Minutes of 204th


of 62

11. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with Rs. 16.0 crore along

with budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and

submitted.




ownership.

14. Permission of municipal authority for water supply and discharge of waste

water into municipal sewer/drain.




related papers.

17. A definite proposal the treatment and recycling of a portion of the domestic

effluents in order to reduce the fresh water load should be incorporated and

detailed submitted.


28- Cement Grinding Unit at Plot no. D-22 Industrial Area and khasra No130C & 130P,

Sikanderabad, Bulandsahar, Uttar Pradesh, M/s Durgashree Bricks Pvt. Ltd., File

No. 2336/ AD(VB)

The committee noted that the matter earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated

14/09/2014 wherein the committee directed the proponent to submit the application under

their signature. The matter was again scheduled in SEAC meeting dated 21/10/2014 wherein

the project proponent did not appear. The matter was again scheduled in SEAC meeting dated

12/10/204.

A presentation was made by Shri Rahul Mittal along with their consultant M/s Prakriti

Consultant Services. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation

made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Cement Grinding Unit at Plot no. D-22

Industrial Area and khasra No130C & 130P, Sikanderabad, Bulandsahar, U.P. M/s

Durgashree Bricks Pvt. Ltd.


Total Plot Area 8120 sqm (D22:1800+130C:3790+130P:2530)

Type of Unit Cement Grinding Unit

Capacity 1200 TPD ( 360000 T.P.A. on 300 working days)

Latitude & Longitude 25°27'9 "N 82°34'38."E

Elevation above Mean Sea Level 674 ft

Green Belt Area 2,680 sqm

Raw Material Clinker & Gypsum : Rajasthan,Fly Ash: from NTPC

Variety of Cement OPC (Ordinary Portland Cement),

PPC (Portland Pozolona Cement)

Water requirement 2 KLD only for domestic use

Solid Waste Only Domestic solid waste generated

Source of water Bore Well (Ground Water)

Minutes of 204th


of 62

Electric requirement 2000 KVA for 1200 TPD Cement Plant (UP Power Corporation)

Worker & Staff 53 nos.

Total Area 8,120SQM(D22:11880000+130C:3790+130P:2530)

Total Constructed Area 4000 SQM

Internal Road 1000 SQM

Total Green Area 2680 SQM

Parking 440 SQM


The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs and general

guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:

Additional TORs:

1. Approved plan/layout plan from Bulandshahar Industrial Development Authority. 2. Details of total area, covered area, open area, factory area, lab area, raw material store

yard.

3. Environment Impact study must be done (by a consultant registered/certified as per QCI

notification/MoEF directives) in an area of 15 km radius with inclusion of following

aspects:

4. Present land use based on satellite imagery should be included. Study area should be 10

Km radius. 5. Details of location of wildlife sanctuary and national parks within 10 km radius of the

plant and plan for conservation and protection of the same should be included. 6. Manufacturing process details for the cement plant should be included.

7. Mass balance for the raw material and products should be included. 8. Energy balance data for all the components should be incorporated.

9. Site-specific micro-meteorological data for temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall including inversion height and mixing height should be

included. 10. Collection of baseline data on air, water (surface and ground water), soil, noise,

demography etc. for one season other than monsoon should be included and the Methods

of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV): Guidance for assessment of

representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental attributes detailed under EIA

manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.

11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from

project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.

12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for the

presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical

characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.

13. Ambient air quality modeling for cement plant should be included. Air quality modeling

for all the plants proposed for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be included.

14. Ambient air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following:

i. Emissions (g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures. ii. Meteorological inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind direction, ambient air temperature,

cloud cover, relative humidity & mixing height) on hourly basis. iii. Model input options for terrain, plume rise, deposition etc.

iv. Print-out of model input and output on hourly and daily average basis. v. A graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance

at every 500 m interval covering the exact location of GLC.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

vi. Details of air pollution control methods used with percentage efficiency that are

used for emission rate estimation with respect to each pollutant.

vii. Applicable air quality standards as per LULC covered in the study area and %

contribution of the proposed plant to the applicable Air quality standard. In case of

expansion project, the contribution should be inclusive of both existing and

expanded capacity.

viii. No. I-VII is to be repeated for fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant and used for industry.

ix. Graphs of monthly average daily concentration with down-wind distance. x. Specify when and where the ambient air quality standards are exceeded either due to

the proposed plant alone or when the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.

xi. Fugitive dust protection or dust reduction technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.

15. Sources of secondary emissions, its control and monitoring as per the CPCB guidelines

should be included.

16. Details of fugitive emissions and control technologies should be provided.

17. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal

particularly slag from any sources.

18. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporation of RSPM data should be

included. Location of one AAQM station should be in downwind direction.

19. Presence of an aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for

recharging the aquifer should be included.

20. Source of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),

metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If surface water is

used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage and distance from project site

should also be included. 21. Ground water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to

quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management. 22. Ground water modeling showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included.

23. Column leachate study for all types of stockpiles or waste disposal sites, at 20oC-50

oC

should be conducted and included.

24. Permission for the drawl of water 94 KLD water from the concerned authority and water balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and

discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation

should be included.

25. Efforts made to minimize use of ground water along with an action plan should be

provided.

26. A chapter on hydrology study by the State Govt. may be included.

27. Action plan for surface as well as roof top rainwater harvesting and ground water

recharge should be included.

28. Scheme of proper storage of fly ash, gypsum, clinker should be included.

29. Action plan for 100% fly ash utilization should be included.

30. Impact of transportation of raw materials and the details of mitigation measures should be

included.

31. Ambient air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be

included for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with emissions (g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures and A graph of daily averaged

concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval covering the exact location of GLC.

32. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources

Minutes of 204th


of 62

as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated 30th

May, 2008.

33. Detailed description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given with

special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.

34. Risk assessment and damage control should be included.

35. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, A note on the impact of drawl of

ground water on recharge potential. 36. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Surface water quality of nearby River

(60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at eight locations must be ascertained.

37. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zone Mapping is required at 1:5000 to 1:10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean river discharge as well

as flood occurrence frequency. 38. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for different

purposes should be included.

39. Provision of traps and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil,

grease and cleaning agents.

40. If the water is mixed with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further

transport should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the

transport capacity.

41. The pathways for pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied

for surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water with a

monitoring and management plans.

42. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,

Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also

Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.

43. Geo-technical data by a bore hole of up to 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground water level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for

liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk Management in the area.

44. End use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. 45. All stock piles will have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of materials to

ground water. 46. Studies on amount of CO2 emission (daily monitoring), Hydrocarbons, other

contamination, if any, and their management.

47. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration including evaluation of noise, heat,

illumination, dust, any other chemicals, metals being suspected in environment and

going into body of workers either through inhalation, ingestion or through skin

absorption and steps taken to avoid Musculo-Skeletal Disorders (MSD), backache, pain in

minor and major joints, fatigue etc. Occupational hazards specific pre-placement and

periodical monitoring and periodical monitoring should be carried out. The detailed plan

to carry out above mentioned activity should be mentioned.

48. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33% area should be included. The

green belt should be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the

traveling roads should also be incorporated. All rooftops/terraces should have some green

cover.

49. Demography of the area and socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.

50. Scheme for compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines for cement plants should be included.

51. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit project should be

Minutes of 204th


of 62

included.

52. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to details of air

pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency and

implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.

53. EMP should include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques,

energy conservation and natural resource conservation.

54. Total capital cost & recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures. 55. Any litigation/court case pending against the proposal or land should also be included.

56. A tabular chart of the TORs and compliance index should be incorporated in EIA/EMP. 57. Project falling with in 10 km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from

National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not earmarked. 58. The proposal is exempted form public hearing by categorizing in B-2 category due to use

of energy efficient technology, on clinker manufacturing at the proposed site, no sensitive area within 10 km. radius, "zero" effluent discharge, utilization of all the solid waste in

the process itself including utilization of fly ash etc.

59. Besides the above, the general points mentioned below should also to be followed during

preparation of EIA/EMP:

• All documents to be properly referenced with index, page numbers and continuous

page numbering.

• Where data are presented in the report especially in tables, the period in which the

data were collected and the sources should be indicated.

As decided by the State Expert Appraisal Committee the above TORs should be

considered for preparation of EIA/EMP report for the Cement Plant; in addition to all

the relevant information as per the Generic Structure of EIA given in Appendix III and IIIA

in the EIA Notification, 2006.

The committee directed the proponent to take further necessary action with regards to

public hearing and the preparation of final EIA. The matter shall be discussed after

submission of final EIA.

29- Mega Leather Cluster located at Vill-Kuraina Bahadurnagar & Senpuirabpara

Near Ramaipur, Distt-Kanpur, U.P. Sri Ashraf Rizwan, Director, C/o Sultan

Tanners, Jajmau, Kanpur, U.P. File No. 2070/ OSD-T

The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEIAA meeting dated

30/10/2014 wherein the Authority taken a decision as follows:

"The SEIAA agreed with the recommendations of the SEAC that the Gram Samaj land is

being proposed for the development of Mega Leather Cluster. Therefore, as per the EIA

notification 14 Sep 2006 the matter falls under category-A i.e. the procedure of

Environmental Clearance to the project proposal does not come under the ambit of SEIAA,

U.P. The project proponent is directed to proceed to the MoEF for the Environmental

Clearance of the proposed proposal and the Proposal is therefore, Closed."

A letter dated 20/11/2014 was communicated to project proponent regarding decision

of SEIAA. The project proponent submitted a representation dated 29/01/2015 regarding the

project proposal. The matter was put up to committee in its meeting dated 21/02/2015. The

committee noted the decision of SEIAA meeting dated 30/10/2014 and deliberated that any

representation with reference to decision taken by SEIAA should be put up to SEIAA itself.

Accordingly, the committee directed to put up the representation of project proponent to the

Authority.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

30- Group Housing Project “Shushant Aquapolis Doondaherra, Ghaziabad- Sri Vinod

Tiku, Ex. Director (Project), 306, Ansal Naurang House, 21, KG Marg, New Delhi.

File No. 2580/ AD-H

1. The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated

15/11/2014 wherein the following request from the project proponent were discussed

in compliance to Hon'ble NGT order dated 05/09/2014 in the application M.A. no.

455/2013.

1. To reinstate the Environmental Clearance granted vide letter no. 692/ SEAC/

148/2011/TA(J) dated 30.03.2012 in light of NGT order M.A. No.455 of 2013

vide dated 05.09.2014

2. Since the controversial solid waste dumping yard area can now become

available to the developer hence, TOR for additional 14 acres land may be

issued.

2. In meeting dated 15/11/2014 , the SEAC directed as follows:

" committee discussed and deliberated that request regarding reinstating of environmental clearance dated 30/03/2012 can be decided only after the reasons for

cancelation of the E.C. letter dated 30/03/2012 be complied/fulfilled.

Also, the status/land use of the site of proposed project “Sushant Aquapolis Doondaherra, Ghaziabad" may be conformed from Ghaziabad Development

Authority. Further, the status of solid waste dumping yard as submitted by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. through their letter dated 30/09/2014 and

15/11/2014 should be conformed from Ghaziabad Development Authority, Nagar

Nigam, Ghaziabad and UP Jal Nigam as on date.

A copy of above communications should also be made to M/s Ansal Properties

and Infrastructure Ltd.

The committee also directed the project proponent to submit copy of writ

petitions and related orders/judgments made by Hon'ble Courts in the related matter,

in any. "

The SEIAA in its meeting dated 21/11/2014 agreed with the decision of

SEAC.

3. A communication was made by Member Secretary, SEIAA to Ghaziabad

Development Authority, Ghaziabad, Municipal Corporation Ghaziabad, Construction

and Design Services and Member Secretary, UPPCB for providing their comments

with respect to directions of SEAC made in meeting dated 15/11/2014.

4. Secretary, Ghaziabad Development Authority, Ghaziabad (through his letter dated

16/12/2014), project manager C&DS, UP Jal Nigam (through his letter dated

06/12/2014) and Municipal Commissioner, Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam (through his

letter dated 21/01/2015) communicated their replies to SEIAA. In all these

communications, these agencies have denied the following claim /version of M/s

Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. regarding 14 acres land in Village-

Doondahera, Ghaziabad that:

"…….The Ghaziabad Development Authority has allocated alternate plot for the

Solid Waste Scheme in Galland and Pipalhera Villages."

5. The SEAC noted that land use of the said 14 acre land is "Dumping Yard" as notified

by Housing and Urban Planning Department, Govt. of U.P. order no. 4582/8-3-2009-

502 writ/2006 dated 21/10/2009. The additional land for Dumping Yard in Village-

Minutes of 204th


of 62

Galland and Pipalhera which has been made available by GDA to Nagar Nigam

Ghaziabad is not an alternate for 14 acres Dumping Yard land at Village-Doondahera.

The committee directed the project proponent that correctness of statements should be

duly verified by the project proponent before making any submissions/claims at

SEIAA.

6. The committee also noted that UP Pollution Control Board has not yet submitted their

replies in the matter.

7. The committee deliberated that in view of information received from Ghaziabad

Development Authority, Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad and C&DS, UP Jal Nigam,

Ghaziabad the request made by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. can not

be entertained by the committee as land use of said 14 acre land in Village-

Doondahera is "Dumping Yard" and Ghaziabad Development Authority has not

allocated any alternate land which would make this 14 acre land in Village-

Doondahera available to M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. Hence, the

submissions/claim made by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. in their

petition to SEIAA are not correct and here by rejected.

8. The committee also noted that there is a Court Case pending at Hon'ble Supreme

Court related to said 14 acre land at Village-Doondahera Ghaziabad as also informed

by project proponent. Hence, no decision can be taken by SEAC in a subjudice matter

at Hon'ble Supreme Court.

9. Further, the committee also observed that the project details as submitted in form-1

alongwith the letter dated 30/09/2014 of M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd.

are not same as proposals on which environmental clearance dated 30/03/2012 was

earlier granted by SEIAA, which was later cancelled by SEIAA on dated 01/04/2013.

A comparative statement may be seen as follows:

Issues As per E.C letter dated

30/03/2012

As per for-1 submitted

alonwith letter dated

30/09/2014

Plot Area 5,60,744.5 sqm 5,60,738.46 sqm

Built-up Area 12,66,653.14 sqm 10,13,351.57 sqm

Water Requirement 4299 KLD 3.26 MLD

Power Requirement 10.32 MW 16 MVA

MSW Generation 19.86 MT/day 15.8 TPD

Stand by DG Sets 4x6.5 MVA 7 MVA (3x1 MVA+4x0.75

MVA+2x0.5 MVA)

Sewage Generation 2826.74 KLD 3.02 MLD

Hence, the request of project proponent to reinstate the environmental

clearance dated 30/03/2012 can not be accepted prima-facie as consideration of

reinstatement request can not be made on a proposal which is different from the one,

which was cancelled by the SEIAA through letter dated 01/04/2013.

10. The committee also noted that the E.C. dated 30/03/2012 was cancelled by SEIAA

hence, the above observations/situation may be forwarded to SEIAA for taking

decision. The SEIAA may also ask Members Secretary, UPPCB to submit their reply

with reference to letter dated 1974/parya/SEAC/2582/2014 dated 26/11/2014 in the

matter.

Minutes of 204th


of 62

31- Group Housing at Khasra No-2243, 2244, Vill-Bambhta, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s

Utility Estates (P) Ltd., & Others. Etc. Sri Beer Singh, Director, C-79, Preet Vihar,

Delhi. File No. 2120/ AD-Sub.

The committee noted that the terms of reference in the matter were issued through

letter dated 17/10/2014. The final EIA submitted by the project proponent through letter

dated 09/11/2014. A presentation was made by Shri Beer Singh, representative of project

proponent along with their consultant M/s Grass Roots Research & Creation India (P) Ltd.

The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the

committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Affordable Housing Project Khasra No-

2243, 2244, 2246, 2247, 2375, 2377, 2378, 2379, 2380, 2381, 2382, 2383, 2384,

2385, 2388, 2396, 2399, 2400, 2401, 2402, 2403, 2406, 2407, 2410, 2411, 2422,

Village Shahpur-Bamheta, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Utility Estates (P) Ltd., & Others.


S. No. Particulars Area (m2

)

1. Plot area 77,651

2. Area under Master Plan (Green + Road)/other land 2,865

3. Land in Possession 74,786

4. Area Under Green (@ 15% of Remaining Plot area) 11,217.900

5. Plot area (Land in possession – Green area) 63,568.100

6. Area Proposed for facilities 11,531

7. Facilities

a) Inter College 4,000

b) High School 2,000

c) Primary School 2,000

d) Nursery School 1,000

e) Health Centre 800

f) Sub Station (11 kVA) 500

g) Anganwadi 500

h) Sub Post Office 100

i) ATM 81

j) C.R.R.C 100

k) Dustbin 300

l) Kiosks 150

7. Net Plot Area 52,037.100

8. Permissible Ground Coverage (@ 45% of Net plot area) 23,416.695

9. Proposed Ground Coverage (@ 23.68% of Net plot area ) 12,325.434

10. Total Permissible FAR (@ 1.75+0.875 = 2.625)

• Basic FAR (@1.75 of Net plot area)

• Purchasable FAR (@ 50% of basic FAR i.e. 0.875)

1,36,597.388

91,064.925

45,532.463

11. Proposed FAR (@ 2.624) 1,36,561.955

12. Permissible incentive FAR against EWS & LIG 16,605.225

13. Proposed incentive FAR against EWS & LIG 16,597.034

14. Permissible Convenient Shopping (@ 0.5% of FAR) 682.987

15. Proposed Convenient Shopping 681.117

16. Stilt Area 10,023.165

17. Fire escape staircase 4,625.156

18. Mumty Area 679.258

19. Machine Room 795.652

20. Built up Area 1,80,813.22

Minutes of 204th


of 62

3. Salient features of the project are as follows:

PROJECT FEATURES DESCRIPTION

Estimated Population 18,988 Nos.

Estimated Water Requirement

Construction Phase

Operation Phase

904 ML (Agency: Private Water Tanker)

1,606 KLD (Agency: Municipal Supply)

STP Capacity = 1600 KLD

Estimated waste water Generation Approx. 1348 KLD

Power Demand

Power Back-up

11,000 KVA

5,000 KVA (10 X 500 KVA each)

Source of Power Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited

Solid Waste Generation 9,174 kg/day

Rain water harvesting pits 11 Pits

Parking Facilities

Required

Proposed

As per MoEF norms: 1366 ECS

As per Ghaziabad bye-laws: 2449 ESS or 4898.00 m2

559 ECS

2450 ESS or 4900 m2

562 ECS


S.

N.

Description

Area

(in m2

)

Total Occupancy Rate of water

demand

(lpcd)

Total Water

Requirement

(KLD)

A. Domestic Water

1. Residential Development

• Main D.Us. 13,640 86 1173.04

• EWS 1,365 86 117.39

• LIG 1,365 86 117.39

• Incentive

Units against

EWS & LIG

1,695 86

145.77

2. Commercial Area

• Staff

23 30 0.69

3. Visitors 900 15 13.5

Total domestic water demand (1+2+3)= 1567.78 1568 KLD

B. Horticulture and Landscape

development

11217.920 11/sqm/day 11.22

C. DG Sets Cooling (10x500

KVA each)

0.9 l/KVA/hr 27

Grand Total (A+B+C) = 1606.22 say 1606 KLD


S.N. Category Kg per capita per day Waste generated (kg/day)

1. Residents

• Main D.Us. (13,640) @ 0.5 6820

• EWS (1,365) @ 0.5 682.5

• LIG (1,365) @ 0.5 682.5

• Incentive EWS/LIG(1,695) @ 0.5 847.5

2. Commercial

• Staff (23)

@ 0.25 5.75

3. Visitors (900) @ 0.15 135

4. Landscape waste

(2.77 acres)

@ 0.2 kg/acre/day 0.55

TOTAL SOLID WASTE GENERATED 9,174 kg/day

Minutes of 204th


of 62

6. The Project proposal falls under Category –8(b) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as

amended).

The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental clearance

to the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority for construction project and following specific conditions:

1. 5% land of total plot area should be allocated to pond.

2. Internal road should be as per Development Authority bye-laws.


the premises.

4. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more

capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be

treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for

designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization.

5. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken with regular testing and monitoring

of treated water.

6. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to


users. 7. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 2% of total project cost /4.0 crore in the matter, shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be

submitted to the authority. 8. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in

accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as amended).

9. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan

submitted.

10. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% solar lighting is to be

provided in the common areas/common stairs.

11. Parking guideline as per Ghaziabad Development Authority should be followed.

Parking for disabled persons should be explored.

12. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

13. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from

the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

14. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done

only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after


15. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building.

16. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

17. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase. 18. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.

19. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of residents.

20. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone to be



Minutes of 204th


of 62

22. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be

restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.

23. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any


24. Land scape plan with list of trees is to be submitted.




construction.



29. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc.

Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including


30. Running/maintenance cost of STP and other environmental facilities should be

computed and included into customer brochure.

(Dr. M. S. Khan)

Chairman, SEAC,UP

(Shri S. C. Brahmachari)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. Asheesh Kumar Singh)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Sr. S.N. Singh)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. S.K. Upadhayay)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. D. C. Gupta)

Member, SEAC, UP

Final minutes of 204 SEAC meeting dated...

Documents

Transcript of Final minutes of 204 SEAC meeting dated...