Final Feasibility Report of Hanumangarh

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Government of Rajasthan

Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report for Two-

Laning Km 0.0 to km 43.0 of SH-7A comprising of the section from

Hanumangarh to Abohar (upto Punjab border) (the Highway – III)

in the State of Rajasthan

FINAL FEASIBILITY REPORT

July – 2016

Submitted by:

In Association with

9/F, Infinity Tower C, DLF Cyber city, DLF Phase - II, Gurgaon - 122002, Haryana, India

Submitted to:

Additional Chief Engineer (PPP), Public Works Department (PWD), 1-Jacob Road, Jaipur - 302004 Rajasthan, India

Public Works Department Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report ofGovernment of Rajasthan Hanumangarh – Abohar (upto Punjab Border) (H3)

Final Feasibility Report, Sep 2015 ( i )

CONTENTS

Chapter Nos. Description

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Chapter : 1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT APPRECIATION

Chapter : 2 DESIGN STANDARDS

Chapter : 3 ENGINEERING SURVEY & INVESTIGATION

Chapter : 4 TRAFFIC SURVEY AND ANALYSIS

Chapter : 5 IMPROVEMENT / UPGRADING PROPOSALS

Chapter : 6 COST ESTIMATE

Chapter : 7 FINANACIAL ANALYSIS AND RECOMMEDATION

Chapter : 8 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Chapter : 9 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Appendices

Public Works Department Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report ofGovernment of Rajasthan Hanumangarh – Abohar (upto Punjab Border) (H3)

Final Feasibility Report, Sep 2015 ( ii )

Abbreviation Full Form / MeaningAADT Annual Average Daily TrafficADT Average Daily TrafficBC Bituminous Concrete

CBR California Bearing RatioCD Cross Drainage

CTVC Classified Traffic Volume CountCW Carriageway

DBM Dense Bituminous MacadamDL Double Lane (Carriageway / Road)EIA Environmental Impact AssessmentEMP Environmental Management Plan

ES Earth ShoulderGDP Gross Domestic ProductGoR Government of RajasthanGOI Government of IndiaGSB Granular Sub-BaseIL Intermediate Lane (Carriageway / Road)

IRC Indian Roads CongressIRR Internal Rate of ReturnLCV Light Commercial VehicleMDR Major District RoadNH National Highway

NPV Net Present ValueNSDP Net State Domestic Product

OD Origin DestinationPCI Per Capita IncomePCU Passenger Car UnitsPF Protected Forest

PIA Project Influence AreaPS Paved Shoulder

PWD Public Work DepartmentROW Right of Way

SH State HighwaySIA Social Impact AssessmentSL Single Lane (Carriageway / Road)

ToR Terms of Reference

Public Works Department Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report ofGovernment of Rajasthan Hanumangarh to Abohar (H3)

Final Feasibility Report, Sep 2015 Ex - 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

0.1 BACKGROUND

The work for Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report for upgradation ofHanumangarh to Abohar (upto Punjab Border) section of SH-7A in the State of Rajasthan(Highway-3 – Package 1) [Length 43km] has been awarded to M/s. AECOM by Public WorksDepartment, Government of Rajasthan vide letter no. F-7(3)/PPP/2014-15/Package1/D-1551,dated on 11-6-2014. In line with Terms of references (TOR) the Feasibility Report is beingsubmitted.

0.2 INVESTIGATIONS & EVALUATIONS

0.2.1 Feasibility Study was carried out by AECOM and the report evaluates Financial Viability interms of Financial Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the homogeneous road sections for optimumupgrading. The above evaluation has been based on various surveys and investigations carriedout during the course of the study and these include traffic, topography, pavement condition,inventory and condition of road/structures and material investigations. Special attention hasbeen given to maximize the use of existing pavement and available land and use of localresources. Beside, due care is also taken to ensure use of modern construction technology toachieve the desired quality and performance requirements and attain the intended level of servicefor the next 25 years.

0.3 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTIONS

0.3.1 General

Project Road (SH-7A) starts from Hanumangarh (Bhagat Singh Chowk) at km 0+000 and endsat Abohar (Gadder Khera Village) at km 43+000 (Rajasthan/ Punjab Border). Project road passesthrough Hanumangarh and Ganganagar districts of Rajasthan. The major settlements along theproject highway are Hanumangarh, Satipura, Dholipal, Kararwala. Complete Project Road is 2Lane configuration.

Table 0.1: Project District

Sl.No. Name of Districts

Location Length(Km) Percentage

From (Km) To (Km)1 Hanumangarh 0.000 28.000 28.0 Km. 65.2%

2 Ganganagar 28.000 43.000 15.0 Km. 34.8%Total 43.0 Km. 100%

Note: Design Length = 42.655 km

0.3.2 Traffic Volume

The summary of the Average Annual Daily Traffic for the project stretch is given in Table 0.2.

· I Count in July 2014 (from 22-Aug-2014 to 29-Aug-2014) and

· II Count in March 2015 (from 7-Mar-2015 to 14-Mar-2015)



Table 0.2: Average of 2 counts surveys in Aug 2014 & Mar 2015

Location km 8 km 28Car, Jeep, Van or Light Motor Vehicle 1523 1312

Tractor with trolley carrying non-agricultural produce 0 0

Light Commercial Vehicle, Mini Bus 79 100Bus 125 138

2-Axle Truck 17 563-Axle Truck 118 139

HCM or EME or Multi Axle Vehicle(MAV) (4 to 6 axles) 103 112

Oversized Vehicles (>7axle) 0 0Tollable PCUs 2887 2965

Non Tollable PCUs 3193 1885

Total PCUs 6080 4850

0.3.3 Proposed Developmental Plan/Construction features are summarised below:-

a) Development scheme can be summarised as given in Table 0.3.

Table 0.3: Summary of Development Scheme

Sl. No. Description Length (km)

A Only Repair and maintenance 3.000

1 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) 30.705

2 2 Lane reconstruction in BT stretches (Existing 7m) 2.500

3 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) (Rural section)(Newly constructed) 4.500

4 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) (Built-up section)(Newly constructed) 1.000

5 2 Lane Cement Concrete (CC) only (Existing 7.0m )(Built-up section) 0.950

TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT 42.655

0.3.4 Bypasses and Realignment

As the existing road geometry follows the manual (IRC: SP-73) requirement and as availableROW is sufficient to fit the proposed cross-section, hence no bypass or realignment is required inthe project road.

0.3.5 IRC: 37-2012 Method of Flexible Pavement Design – for New construction

Pavement composition thicknesses were designed for reconstruction and new constructionsections as per IRC: 37-2012. For strengthening of existing flexible road pavement, overlaythickness were established as per IRC: 81-1997. At Toll Plaza locations provision of rigidpavement is given and pavement composition was determined as per IRC: 58-2002.

The flexible pavement thicknesses required for New Pavement of stretches is given in Table 0.4



& Table 0.5.

Table 0.4: Flexible Pavement Thickness for New pavement and Reconstruction Stretches

Existing Chainage DesignTraffic(MSA)

CBR ofSubgrade

(%)

ViscosityGrade ofBitumen

Proposed Minimum PavementThickness (mm)

From To BC DBM WMM GSB Total

0.000 43.000 20 10 VG 30 40 80 250 200 570

0.3.6 IRC: 81-1997 Method of Flexible Overlay – For Strengthening of Existing Pavement

The average characteristic deflection (Dc) values to be used for design purposes have been workedfrom BBD survey. The thicknesses are deduced from Figure 9 of IRC 81-1997 in terms ofbituminous macadam construction. However to match with the new pavement thickness, overlaythickness proposed are presented in Table 0.5.

Table 0.5: Proposed Overlay Thicknesses on existing lane

Description BC DBM

For Stretches proposed for overlay only 40 mm 80 mm

0.3.7 IRC: 58-2002 Method of Rigid Pavement Design – For Toll Plaza locations

a) Pavement composition thickness for rigid pavements at Toll plaza location is given inTable 0.6.

Table 0.6: Rigid Pavement Composition at Toll Plaza

Material Type Thickness (mm)Pavement Quality Concrete (M-40) 300Dry Lean Concrete (M-15) 150Granular Sub-base 150Subgrade 500

0.3.8 Junction Improvement

All major / minor junctions on the project highway need to be upgraded and merged with Projecthighway carriageway.

0.3.9 Proposal of Bridges, Culverts and other Structures

No major bridge exists. Seven minor bridges exist on the project road and three minor bridgeshave been proposed for widening & rest for rehabilitation. The development proposal for all theexisting bridges is tabulated in Table 0.7.



Table 0.7B: Summary of Development of Existing Minor Bridge

Location(Chainage) Span Arrangement Width of carriageway

between kerbs (m) Proposed Upgradation

5.100 3 X 4.2 7.2 Widening9.950 2 X 5.6 12.0 Rehabilitation

16.500 2 X 4.0 12.0 Rehabilitation22.300 2 X 3.2 12.0 Rehabilitation40.260 2 X 3.9 7.0 Widening41.530 2 X 3.8 7.0 Widening42.800 5 X 11.5 8.0 Rehabilitation

Note: Five minor bridges are proposed for widening as the width of carriageway is <7.5m(minimum required as per clause 7.3.2 of manual).

a) Culverts

There are total 56 existing culverts on the project road, out of which 32 are porposed forwidening /Reconstruction. A summary of the existing and proposed (if any) culverts is givenbelow.

Ø 20 nos. existing culverts need to be reconstructed.

Ø 12 nos. existing culverts are proposed to be widened.

Ø Renaming 24 nos. existing culverts are proposed for rehabilitation with minor repair.

b) Railway line crossing

The project road crosses railway tracks at one location only as level crossing. The summary ofexisting level crossing is given below:

Table 0.8: Summary of Existing Level Crossings

Sl.No. ExistingChainage

TrackDetails TVU Data Remarks

1 2+965 BG (Single) 1,39,08930 March 2014

As per IRC 62-1976 the TVUis more than 50,000 and

requires ROB

In view of the site constrain in proposing ROB, a joint site visit was conducted. It was concludedby PWD officials, not to propose ROB at this location.

0.3.10 Proposal for Underpass/Flyover

No underpass or flyover is proposed along the project road.

0.3.11 Bus Shelters

7 nos. of Bus Shelters are proposed along the Project Road.

0.3.12 Toll Plaza

Complete project road has been considered as one tolling Homogeneous Section. And the tollplaza is proposed at km 28. The location and details of the toll plaza is given in Table 0.9.

Table 0.9: Details Toll Plaza



TollingHomogenous

Section #Location Tolling

Length

Bypass/Structure >5

Cr., if anyReason for Selection

THS 1 Km 28.300 42.655km Nil

Between Hanumangarh km 0.00and Abohar (upto Punjab

border) km 42.655

0.3.13 The project cost on above items has been worked out based on development proposal of the projectcorridor. Total Cost of the Project as assessed at this stage is given in Table 0.10.

Table 0.10: Abstract Cost Estimate

S.No. Bill No. Description Amount (%)

1 Bill No 1 SITE CLEARANCE & DISMANTLING 11,36,293 0.3%

2

Bill No 2 EARTH WORKS

2,60,98,176

5.8%

3 Bill No 3 GRANULAR SUB-BASE AND BASECOURSES 3,49,70,320 7.8%

4 Bill No 4 BITUMINOUS & RIGID WORKS 23,13,67,981 51.7%

5 Bill No 5 CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS(CULVERTS) 83,00,700 1.9%

6Bill No 6

STRUCTURAL WORKS (BRIDGES ,UNDERPASSES, FLY OVERS &INTERCHANGE) 1,21,55,040

2.7%

7Bill No 7

TRAFFIC SIGNAGES, ROADMARKINGS & OTHERAPPURTENANCES 4,40,81,691

9.8%

8Bill No 8 DRAINAGE, PROTECTION WORKS &

RETAINING WALLS 3,21,75,0007.2%

9 Bill No 9 HIGHWAY LIGHTING 86,52,000 1.9%

10 Bill No 10 TOLL PLAZA 2,25,00,000 5.0%

11 Bill No 11 JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT, BUSSHELTERS 2,62,66,934 5.9%

TOTAL COST FOR CIVIL WORKS 44,77,04,135 100%

Cost for Civil works Per Km 1.05 Crores

0.3.14 Results of Financial Analysis

Ø Based on preliminary financial analysis the project is Viable on VGF, hence theproject is recommended to be developed on Toll Basis.



0.3.15 Environmental Impact Assessment

Ø The project road is not passing through any reserve forest; protected forest and wild lifesanctuary. Hence project road does not require forest clearance & wild life clearance.

Ø Further the project road does not require environmental clearance as per the EIAnotification 2006 and its amendment thereafter.

Ø No tree is proposed to be fell for the project upgradation.

0.3.16 Social Impact Assessment

Ø No major social impact is envisaged with the up-gradation of the Project road.

Ø No land acquisition is required for the proposed upgradation of the project road.

Ø 6 CPR (Cultural Property Resource) is under direct impact.

· Government Properties likely to be affected

The survey data shows that there are 5 government properties that are likely to beaffected in proposed project road. The Government properties include 4 nos. BusStand and 1 no. Tax Office.

· Community properties Likely to be affected along the Road

The survey revealed that there is 1 community property likely to be affected due toproposed project road. The community properties include 1 well.


Final Feasibility Report, Sep 2015 1 - 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER-1: INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT APPRECIATION ....................................... 1-2

1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 1-2

1.2 COMMENCEMENT ............................................................................................................ 1-2

1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................... 1-2

1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................... 1-3

1.5 SCOPE OF SERVICES .......................................................................................................... 1-4

1.6 PROJECT APPRECIATION................................................................................................. 1-4

1.6.1 Project District.......................................................................................................... 1-4

1.6.2 Terrain and Landuse ............................................................................................... 1-4

1.6.3 Carriageway Configuration .................................................................................... 1-4

1.6.4 Existing Pavement Condition ................................................................................. 1-4

1.6.5 Environmental and Social Sensitive Areas ............................................................ 1-5

1.6.6 Environmental Sensivity ......................................................................................... 1-5

1.6.7 Religious Sensitive Structures ................................................................................ 1-5

1.6.8 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................. 1-5

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

Fig. 1.1: Index Map showing Project Road ..................................................................................... 1-3

Table 1.1: District wise of Project Length ........................................................................................ 1-4



CHAPTER-1: INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT APPRECIATION

1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

The Governor of Rajasthan acting through the Additional Chief Engineer (PPP), PublicWorks Department, Government of Rajasthan (the “Authority”) is engaged in thedevelopment of State Highways and as part of this endeavor, the Authority has decidedto undertake two-laning of following roads through Public Private Partnership onDesign, Build, Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) basis:

Sl.No. Location (kms) Location (Place Name) Segment No.

1. Km. 39 to Km. 267 of SH-3 Padampur to Bikaner Highway- I

2. Km. 71 to Km. 231 of SH-6 Dungargarh to Rajgarh Highway- II

3. Km. 0.0 to Km. 43 of SH-7A Hanumangarh to Abohar(upto Punjab border) Highway- III

4. Km. 0.0 to Km. 85 of SH-7B Sadulshahar to Srikaranpur Highway- IV

In order to fulfill the above, PWD, Rajasthan has appointed M/s. AECOM inAssociation with G-Eng., as Consultant to carry out the Feasibility Study fordetermining the technical feasibility and financial viability of the project highway.

1.2 COMMENCEMENT

The work for Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report for Two-laningof Km. 0 to Km. 43 of SH-7A comprising the section from Hanumangarh to Abohar(upto Punjab border)-(Highway-III) in the State of Rajasthan has been awarded to theConsultants vide letter no. F-7(3)/PPP/2014-15/Package1/D-1551, dated on 11-6-2014.

The Consultants have submitted following reports in consonance with Terms ofReference.

Sl. No. Report Date of Submission1. Inception Report 8th August 20142. Supplementary Inception Report 10th September 20143. Alignment report & First Traffic survey 23rd September 20144. Revised Supplementary Inception Report * 12th December 20145. Draft Feasibility Report 9th April 20156. Final Feasibility Report 10th September 20157 Revised Final Feasibility Report 14th July 2016

*Revision was done as per Guidelines for Financial Analysis issued by PWD; vide No ACE/PPP/PA/489dated 25th November 2014.

The Supplementary Inception Report provided the findings of financial viability of theProject on PPP (VGF) basis. Based on financial viability, PWD advised Consultants to goahead for the Feasibility Report vide letter No F.7(3)/PPP/2014-15-Package-1/D-301dated 12th December 2014.

This report deals with the findings of the technical feasibility of the project road in linewith Terms of References (TOR) and after incorporating modifications as concluded



during client meetings in Aug 2015 & the letter no 732 dated 29th July 2015 from theoffice of the Addl. Chief Engineer (PPP), this report is finalized as “Final FeasibilityReport”.

1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Project Road (SH-7A) starts from Hanumangarh (Bhagat Singh Chowk) at km0+000 and ends at Abohar (Gadder Khera Village) at km 43+000 (Rajasthan/ PunjabBorder). Project road serve as an important highway linking two Hanumangarh withPunjab state.

Project Road passes through Hanumangarh and Sri Ganganagar districts of Rajasthan.The major settlements along the project highway are Hanumangarh, Satipura, Rorawali,Dholipal, Kheruwala, Hathiyanwala, Kararwala. The index map depicting the projectroad is presented in Fig. 1.1.

Fig. 1.1: Index Map showing Project Road

1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVE

The objective of this consultancy is to undertake technical feasibility studies andprepare a Feasibility Report of the Project Highway for the purpose of firming up theAuthority’s requirements in respect of development and construction of the ProjectHighway and Project Facilities and enabling the prospective bidders to assess theAuthority’s requirements in a clear and predictable manner with a view to ensuring:

i. enhanced safety and level of service for the road users;

ii. superior operation and maintenance enabling enhanced operational efficiency ofthe Project Highway;

iii. minimal adverse impact on the local population and road users due to roadconstruction;



iv. minimal adverse impact on environment;

v. minimal acquisition of land; and

vi. Phased development of the Project Highway for improving its financial viabilityconsistent with the need to minimize frequent inconvenience to traffic that may becaused if additional works are undertaken within a period of seven years from thecommencement of construction of the Project Highway.

1.5 SCOPE OF SERVICES

As per the Terms of Reference (TOR) the scope of services for the project includes thefollowing:

i. Traffic survey and demand assessment

ii. Engineering surveys and investigations.

iii. Location and layout of toll plazas.

iv. Location and layout of bus shelters.

v. Social Impact Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment

vi. Preliminary design of roads, bridges and structures etc.

vii. Preparation of Land Plan schedules and Utility Relocation Plans.

viii. Preparation of Indicative Bill of Quantities and Rough Cost Estimate.

ix. Preparation of Schedule A, B, C, D & H of the Concession Agreement.

1.6 PROJECT APPRECIATION

1.6.1 Project District

Project Road (SH-7A) starts from Hanumangarh Town (km 0.000) and ends at Abhor(Rajasthan/ Punjab Border Km. 43.000). The project road passes through Hanumangarhand Ganganagar districts of Rajasthan.

Table 1.1: District wise of Project Length

Sl.No. Name of Districts Location Length

(Km) PercentageFrom (Km) To (Km)1 Hanumangarh 0.000 28.000 28 Km. 65%2 Ganganagar 28.000 43.000 15 Km. 35%

Total 43 Km. 100%

The project district fall in the dry desert climate, with huge variation in temperature andscanty rainfall.

1.6.2 Terrain and Land use

The Project Highway passes through plain terrain. Land use along the project highwayis predominantly barren & agriculture land.

1.6.3 Carriageway Configuration

The project road is completely 2-lane configuration.

1.6.4 Existing Pavement Condition

During reconnaissance survey visual condition of the project road reveals that Projectroad is in fair to good condition. However poor condition of the road is also found but



at very few section. The carriageway is predominantly flexible pavement, with aroundone km as CC pavement.

1.6.5 Environmental and Social Sensitive Areas

Trees and Forest

Along the Project Road, there are “Revenue Plantation” comprising trees of Kikar,Neem, Totlis, and Bair.

1.6.6 Environmental Sensitivity

The project alignment is not in environmental sensitivity zone.

1.6.7 Religious Sensitive Structures

As such there is no major religious structure situated along the project road. Andupgradation of the project road has no direct impact on any of the religious structure.

1.6.8 Purpose of this Report

Submission of this Report contains all necessary technical and financial implications forexecution of the Project. The report has been prepared as per various terms andconditions of the “TOR” and after incorporating modifications as concluded duringclient meetings & office letters, including below mention letter,

However based on revised BSR 2016, consultant revised the costing and revisedfeasibility is being submitted in July 2016.



TABLE OF CONTENT

CHAPTER-2: DESIGN STANDARDS ......................................................................................... 2-2

2.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................ 2-2

2.2 ITEMS DETAILED FOR DESIGN STANDARDS............................................................... 2-2

2.3 CAPACITY STANDARDS AND WIDTH OPF CARRIGEWAY ....................................... 2-2

2.4 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS ................................................................................ 2-3

2.4.1 Design Standards ..................................................................................................... 2-3

2.4.2 Vertical Profile ......................................................................................................... 2-4

2.4.3 Typical Cross-sections ............................................................................................. 2-4

2.5 STANDARDS FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN ......................................................................... 2-4

2.5.1 Flexible Pavement.................................................................................................... 2-4

2.6 CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ................................................................................... 2-5

2.6.1 Drainage structures ................................................................................................. 2-5

2.7 SLOPE PROTECTION ......................................................................................................... 2-5

2.7.1 Side Slopes ............................................................................................................... 2-5

2.7.2 Slope Protection ....................................................................................................... 2-5

2.8 INTERSECTIONS................................................................................................................. 2-5

2.9 DRAINAGE SYSTEM .......................................................................................................... 2-5

2.10 DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN STANDARD FOR STRUCTURES .............. 2-5


Table 2.1: Categorization of Elements for Design Standards ........................................................ 2-2

Table 2.2: Proposed Design Volume of Highway in PCUs per day ............................................. 2-3

Table 2.3: Geometric Design Standards for the Project Corridor .................................................. 2-3

Table 2.4: Recommended Slopes in Various Elements for Proper Surface Drainage .................. 2-5



CHAPTER-2: DESIGN STANDARDS

2.1 GENERAL

The formulation of the design standards is required in order to avoid any inconsistencyin design from one section to the other and provide desired level of service and safety.For this project it is proposed to follow Design Standards given in IRC codes, guidelinesand special publications. IRC:73-2007 “Two-laning of highways through Public PrivatePartnership” Manual of specifications and standards published by PlanningCommission and orders issued as per GoR, Administrative Reform department ordersare followed.

2.2 ITEMS DETAILED FOR DESIGN STANDARDS

The design standards of all the elements of a highway corridor can be grouped into thefollowing categories as given in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Categorization of Elements for Design Standards

Category Design element

Design CapacityDesign service volume standardsDesign capacity standards

Geometric Design

Cross-sectional elementsSight distanceHorizontal curvesVertical curves

Pavement Design CBR, Traffic, Structural Strength

Grade Separators and Cross DrainageStructures

UnderpassesFlyover / ROBsBridges and Culverts

Intersections and Interchanges.At grade intersectionsGrade separated intersectionsAcceleration and deceleration lanes

Slope protection Side slopesSlope protection

Drainage system Longitudinal, cross drainage

Safety Measures

Guard rails & safety barriersTraffic signalsRoad signage & pavement markingsFootpaths and sidewalks

2.3 CAPACITY STANDARDS AND WIDTH OF CARRIGEWAY

The width of carriageway is decided based on the following “Projected Traffic Volume”as on the date of commencement of the Project:



Table 2.2: Proposed Design Volume of Highway in PCUs per day

Sl. No. TrafficVolume PCUs Carriageway width (in M) Maximum Capacity

(PCUs per day)1 Upto 1000 Single Lane (3.75m) 20002 1000 – 2500 Intermediate Lane (5.50m) 60003 2500 – 7500 Two Lane (7.0m) 150004 Above 7500 Two Lane + Paved Shoulder (10.00m) 18000

Source: As per GoR, Administrative Reform (Group) Department (order no. F-6(25)AR/Gr.3/2014 dated 27-8-2014)

2.4 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

2.4.1 Design Standards

Design Standards for major features have been extracted from IRC: SP-73-2007standards conforming to design speeds 100kmph, 80kmph and 65 Kmph for plainterrain given in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3: Geometric Design Standards for the Project CorridorSl.No. Description Standards For 2-Lane

1.Design speedPlain TerrainRolling Terrain

100Kmph /(80Kmph)*80Kmph /(65Kmph)*

2.Proposed ROW for New AlignmentRural AreaBuilt-up Area

45m30m

3.

Roadwayi. Lane widthii. Paved Shoulder width on outer sideiv. Cross slope in lanesv. Cross slope in Cement Concrete Surfacingvi. Cross slope in Paved shoulders

3.5m1.5m2.5%2.0%2.5%

7.Sight distancei. Desirable Minimumii. Safe Stopping Distance

360m180m

8.

Horizontal curvaturei. Requiring no super elevationii. Absolute minimum for 100 kmphiii. Absolute minimum for 80 kmphiv. Absolute minimum for 65 kmph

1800 m360 m240 m150m

9. Maximum Super elevation 7 %10. Rate of change of super elevation 1 in 150

11. Vertical AlignmentMinimum distance between PVI 150m

12. Gradient: Ruling and Limiting 3.33% & 5.0%13. Minimum length of vertical curve 60m14. Maximum grade change not requiring vertical curve 0.5%15. Vertical clearance to road bridge over road 5.5 m



Sl.No. Description Standards For 2-Lane

16. Vertical Clearance to road bridge over rail 6.75m

17.

Embankment slopeIn normal sectionIn pitching proposed sectionsIn high embankment (>3m)

2H: 1V1.5H: 1V3.0H: 1V

( )* Absolute Minimum

The Project highway is proposed to be improved as per the design standards detailedabove. The proposed centre line has been designed with an objective to maximize theusage of existing pavement, better traffic management during construction and bettercompaction of the widened embankment.

2.4.2 Vertical Profile

The Profile of the Project Corridor has been finalized on the basis of DTM data collectedduring the topographic survey. In addition to the standards and guidelines set in thischapter, there are other considerations to finalize the vertical profiles, which arepresented below:

Ø Minimum distance between two PVIs (Point of Vertical Intersection) is 150m.

Ø Minimum longitudinal gradient is 0.5%, for longitudinal drainage for KerbedPavements.

Ø Minimum length of a vertical curve is 60m.

Ø Maximum gradient for Underpass approaches is 2.5%.

Ø Minimum K (rate of change of vertical curvature) value as 75 for the summit curveand 45 for valley curve.

2.4.3 Typical Cross-sections

Ø The project road shall generally have configuration of two lane carriageway withpaved shoulder/granular shoulder on both sides.

2.5 STANDARDS FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

2.5.1 Flexible Pavement

Designs for new pavement and overlays have been dealt in accordance with IRCrequirements. The Preliminary Designs are carried out on the basis of sub-grade 4 daysoaked CBR. Flexible pavement for new carriageways has been designed in accordancewith the guidelines of IRC: 37-2012.

The new flexible pavement structure shall comprise of Bituminous Concrete wearingcourse on bituminous base course of Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM). Below thebituminous layers, a Granular base with well-graded aggregates in the form of Wet MixMacadam (WMM) base has been laid on top of GSB layer. All these layers has beenconstructed to the requirements of MORT&H specifications - 2013.

Overlays design on the existing carriageway has been carried out in accordance withIRC: 81-1997 using BBD deflections.



2.6 CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES

2.6.1 Drainage structures

Drainage structures basically comprise of Major Bridges, Minor Bridges and Culverts.The standards / specifications for classifying these are given as:

Major Bridge

Bridges having an overall length more than 60 m.

Minor Bridge

Bridges having length varying between 6m to 60m are termed as minor bridges.

2.7 SLOPE PROTECTION

2.7.1 Side Slopes

As per IRC: SP-73-2007: side slope shall not be steeper than 2H:1V unless soils retainedby suitable measures.

2.7.2 Slope Protection

While embankments less than 3m is proposed to be turfed, stone pitching is proposedfor embankment having height more than 3m.

2.8 INTERSECTIONS

At Grade Intersections

At-grade intersections have been designed according to IRC: SP: 41 ‘Guidelines for theDesign of At-grade Intersections in Rural and Urban Areas’.

2.9 DRAINAGE SYSTEM

Although the project road falls in dry desert climate with scanty rainfall, however inorder to ensure no pooling of water at any time on the highway proper camber forcarriageway, shoulder has been proposed.

Table 2.4: Recommended Slopes in Various Elements for Proper Surface Drainage

Element Recommended SlopeLanes and shoulders with Bituminous Concrete Surfacing 2.5%Lanes and shoulders with Cement Concrete Surfacing 2.0%Cross slope in Granular shoulders 3.0%

2.10 DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN STANDARD FOR STRUCTURES

The detailed inventory and condition survey of the existing structure has beenconducted. Based on detailed survey the proposal for structural arrangement has beenfinalised. The methodology and standards to be adopted are illustrated below:

Materials

Concrete Grade

Grade of concrete in various elements shall be kept as follows for moderate conditionsof exposure;

· All RCC members - M45 for bridges with PSC spans and other major bridges,

M35/M30 for minor bridges, M30 for culverts



· All PCC members - M15 for bridges with PSC spans and major bridges,

M15 for minor bridges and culverts

Reinforcement Steel

Only Thermo Mechanically Treated (TMT) Fe-500 bars conforming to IS:1786-2008 shallbe used as reinforcing steel.

Exposure Condition

Moderate exposure conditions will be considered while designing various componentsof all the structures.

Concrete Clear Covers:

For all reinforcement - As per relevant IRC code

For Pre-stress cable - As per relevant IRC code

Pre-stressing System

System (Post tensioning) 19C15 multi-pull strand system of "Freyssinet" or"ISMALCCL" or equivalent

Cables (Post tensioning) 19C15 cables with strands of 15.2mm nominaldiameter

High Tensile Steel For both post/pre tensioning

Strands Nominal 15.2mm dia. 7 ply low relaxation strandsconforming to class 2 of IS: 14268-95

Area 150 sq. mm per strand (nominal cross sectionalarea)

Ultimate load 279.19 KN per strandModulus of Elasticity 1.95x105MPa

Sheathing (Post tensioning) 90mm OD Bright metal corrugated flexiblesheathing for 19C15 cables respectively

Friction Coefficient (Posttensioning) 0.25/radian

Wobble Coefficient (Posttensioning) 0.0046/m

Anchorage Slip (Post tensioning) 6mm average

Loss of force due to Relaxation2.5% at 0.7 UTS after 1000 hrs. The final relaxationvalue for design shall be 3.0 times the 1000 hr.value

Stressing shall be carried out simultaneously from both ends. All the strands of a cableshall be stressed in one go. Provisions for 4% emergency cables will be provided. If theyare not utilized during construction, they will be pulled out and cable ducts will begrouted and plugged suitably. Access to the super-structure shall be provided to enablemaintenance, inspection and future pre-stressing operations.

Structural Steel

All structural steel, castings and forgings, fasteners (bolts, nuts, washers and rivets),welding consumables and wire ropes and cables shall conform to the provisions ofIRC:24 – 2010.

Bearings



· Pot fixed/Pot PTFE sliding bearings shall be proposed for simply supportedsuperstructures. These bearings shall be designed and supplied by the approvedmanufacturers. The loads and forces on the bearings shall be calculated to enable themanufacturer to design these bearings and these shall conform to Cl. 2006 ofMORTH's Specifications for Road & Bridge Works (5th Revision).

Expansion Joints

The following types of Expansion Joints shall be adopted;

· Filler type expansion joints

Filler type expansion joints shall be proposed for minor bridges with solid slabsuperstructures having span lengths not exceeding 10 metres. These types of joints shallconform to Cl. 2605 of MoRTH's Specifications for Road & Bridge Works (5th Revision).

· Single Strip seal expansion joints

Single Strip seal expansion joints shall be proposed for superstructures havingmovements up to 70mm (± 35mm). The strip seal type expansion joints shall conform toCl. 2607 of MORTH's Specifications for Road and Bridge works (5th Revision).

Miscellaneous

· An asphaltic wearing course shall be proposed over the deck slab.

· Drainage spouts with gratings at the top shall be provided on the bridges to ensureproper drainage of surface water.

· An approach slab, 3.5m long and 300mm thick, resting on the bracket taken outfrom the dirt wall shall be provided on both sides of the bridge resting on the150mm thick leveling course. The gap between the approach slab and dirt wall shallbe filled with bituminous joint filler sealing compound.

· Weep holes shall be provided behind abutment and wing wall to avoid building upof hydrostatic pressure behind them. Weep holes shall be provided 150mm, abovethe low water level or bed level whichever is higher.

Codes to be adopted for design

Following codes have been used for the preliminary design:

i. IRC:2-1968 - Route Marker Signs for National Highways(First Revision)

ii. IRC:5-2015 - Standard Specifications & Code of Practice for Roadbridges, Section I – General Features of Design (SeventhRevision)

iii. IRC:6-2014 - Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for RoadBridges, Section-II Loads and Stresses (Revised Edition)

iv. IRC:7-1971 - Recommended Practice for Numbering Bridges andCulverts (First Revision)

v. IRC:8-1980 - Type Designs for Highway Kilometre Stones (SecondRevision)

vi. IRC:22-2015 - Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for RoadBridges, Section VI – Composite Construction (Limit



States Design) (Second Revision)

vii. IRC:24-2010 - Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for RoadBridges, Steel Road Bridges (Limit State Method) ThirdRevision)

viii. IRC:35-2015 - Code of Practice for Road Markings (First Revision)

ix. IRC:36-2010 - Recommended Practice for Construction of EarthEmbankments and Sub-Grade for Road Works (FirstRevision)

x. IRC:37-2012 - Tentative Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements

xi. IRC:45-1972 - Recommendations for Estimating the Resistance of SoilBelow the Maximum Scour Level in the Design of Well

xii. IRC:58-2015 - Guidelines for the Design of Plain Jointed RigidPavements for Highways (Fourth Revision)

xiii. IRC:67-2012 - Code of Practice for Road Signs (Third Revision)

xiv. IRC:73-1980 - Geometric Design Standards for Rural (Non-Urban)Highways

xv. IRC:78-2014 - Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for RoadBridges, Section VII - Foundations and Substructures(Revised Edition)

xvi. IRC:81-1997 - Guidelines for Strengthening of Flexible RoadPavements Using Benkelman Beam Deflection Technique(First Revision)

xvii. IRC:83-2015 (Part I) - Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for RoadBridges, Section IX – Bearing, Part I: Metallic Bearing(First Revision)

xviii. IRC:83-2015 (Part III) - Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Roadbridges, Section IX – Bearings, Part III: POT, POT-CUM-PTFE, PIN and Metallic Guide Bearings

xix. IRC: 87-2011 - Guidelines for Formwork, Falsework andTemporary Structures (First Revision)

xx. IRC:90-2010 - Guidelines of Selection, Operation and Maintenanceof Bituminous Hot Mix Plant (First Revision)

xxi. IRC:109-2015 - Guidelines for Wet Mix Macadam (First Revision)

xxii. IRC:111-2009 - Specifications for Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes

xxiii. IRC:112-2011 - Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges

xxiv. IRC:SP:13-2004 - Guidelines for the Design of Small Bridges & Culverts(First Revision)

xxv. IRC:SP:18-1978 - Manual for Highway bridge Maintenance Inspection

xxvi. IRC:SP:21-2009 - Guidelines on Landscaping and Tree Plantation

xxvii.IRC:SP:35-1990 - Guidelines for Inspection and Maintenance of Bridges

xxviii. IRC:SP:40-1993 - Guidelines on Techniques for strengthening and



Rehabilitation of Bridges

xxix. IRC:SP:47-1998 - Guidelines on Quality Systems for Road Bridges (PlainReinforced, Pre-stressed and Composite Concrete)

xxx. IRC:SP:73-2007 - Manual of Standards & Specifications for Two Laningof Highways through PPP.

xxxi. IRC:MoRTH:2014 - Specifications for Road and Bridge Works (Fifth Revision)



TABLE OF CONTENT

CHAPTER-3: ENGINEERING SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS ..................................... 3-3

3.1 ROAD INVENTORY AND PAVEMENT CONDITION ................................................... 3-3

3.1.1 Climate ..................................................................................................................... 3-3

3.1.2 Terrain ...................................................................................................................... 3-4

3.1.3 Land Use .................................................................................................................. 3-4

3.1.4 Carriageway and Roadway width ......................................................................... 3-4

3.1.5 Surfacing Type ......................................................................................................... 3-5

3.1.6 Shoulder ................................................................................................................... 3-5

3.1.7 Embankment Height ............................................................................................... 3-5

3.1.8 Right of Way ............................................................................................................ 3-5

3.1.9 Villages and Towns ................................................................................................. 3-7

3.1.10 Side Drain ................................................................................................................. 3-7

3.1.11 Horizontal Curves ................................................................................................... 3-7

3.1.12 Road Junctions ......................................................................................................... 3-8

3.1.13 Road Signs ................................................................................................................ 3-9

3.1.14 Pavement Condition Survey ................................................................................... 3-9

3.1.15 Shoulder Condition ............................................................................................... 3-10

3.1.16 Drainage Condition ............................................................................................... 3-11

3.2 BENKELMAN BEAM DEFLECTION TECHNIQUE....................................................... 3-11

3.3 TRIAL PITS ......................................................................................................................... 3-12

3.3.1 Pavement Composition ......................................................................................... 3-13

3.3.2 Characterization of Subgrade ............................................................................... 3-15

3.4 MATERIAL INVESTIGATIONS ....................................................................................... 3-17

3.4.1 Borrow Area Soil ................................................................................................... 3-17

3.4.2 Sand Quarry ........................................................................................................... 3-17

3.4.3 Aggregates ............................................................................................................. 3-18

3.5 INVENTORY AND CONDITION SURVEY OF BRIDGES AND CULVERTS ............... 3-18

3.6 RAILWAY OVER BRIDGE (ROB) AND LEVEL CROSSING.......................................... 3-19




TABLE 3.1: LENGTH OF PROJECT ROAD IN THE INFLUENCE DISTRICTS ................................................ 3

TABLE 3.2A: SUMMARY OF LANE CONFIGURATION ............................................................................. 4

TABLE 3.2B: CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ...................................................................... 5

TABLE 3.3: EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) ........................................................................................ 6

TABLE 3.3: LOCATION OF BUILT-UP ...................................................................................................... 7

TABLE 3.4: LOCATION OF MAJOR & MINOR ROAD JUNCTIONS ............................................................ 8

FIG 3.3: MAJOR JUNCTION ALONG THE OF PROJECT ROAD ................................................................... 9

FIG 3.4: MINOR JUNCTION ALONG THE PROJECT ROAD ....................................................................... 9

TABLE 3.5: CRITERIA FOR CLASSIFICATION OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS .................................................. 9

FIG 3.5: ROAD CONDITION/ STATUS .................................................................................................. 10

FIG 3.6: PAVEMENT CONDITION ......................................................................................................... 10

FIG 3.7: VIEW OF BBD SURVEY AT KM 40+175 .................................................................................... 12

TABLE 3.6: CHARACTERISTIC DEFLECTION ALONG THE PROJECT ROAD ............................................ 12

FIG 3.8: CHARACTERISTIC DEFLECTION (MM) ALONG THE PROJECT ROAD SH-7A............................ 12

TABLE 3.7: PAVEMENT COMPOSITION OF THE EXISTING ROAD .......................................................... 13

TABLE 3.8: DIFFERENT TESTS CARRIED OUT ON SUBGRADE SOIL ....................................................... 15

TABLE 3.9: TEST RESULTS OF EXISTING SUBGRADE SOIL ..................................................................... 16

TABLE 3.10: DETAILS OF BORROW SOIL LOCATION ............................................................................ 17

TABLE 3.11: TEST RESULTS OF BORROW AREA SOIL ............................................................................ 17

TABLE 3.12: LISTS OF SOURCE OF MATERIALS .................................................................................... 17

FIG 3.9: QUARRY CHART FOR PROJECT ROAD ..................................................................................... 18

TABLE 3.13: SUMMARY OF EXISTING BRIDGES AND CULVERTS ........................................................... 18

FIG 3.10: RAILWAY CROSSING ALONG THE PROJECT ROAD AT KM 2.965 ........................................... 20

FIG 3.11: PLAN SHOWING RAILWAY CROSSING ALONG THE PROJECT ROAD AT KM 2.965 ................ 20



CHAPTER-3: ENGINEERING SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS

3.1 ROAD INVENTORY AND PAVEMENT CONDITION

An inventory of the Project Road (PR) has been carried out with visual observationssupplemented with topo-survey. All existing details like terrain, land-use, surfacingtype and width, shoulder type & width, subgrade, local soil type, curve details,intersection details, retaining structures details, location of water bodies, height ofembankment or depth of cut, cross drainage structures, road side facilities, existingutility services, general drainage conditions etc., were recorded. The road inventory hasbeen referenced to the existing kilometer posts established along the roadside. Adetailed road inventory is presented in the Appendix 3.1.

Fig 2.1: Start of the Project Road atHanumangarh City ( Bhagat Singh

Chowk)

Fig 2.2: End of the Project Road atRajasthan/ Punjab Border

The Project Road (SH-7A) starts from Hanumangarh (Km. 0.000) and ends at Abohar(Gadder Khera Village) at km 43+00 (Rajasthan/ Punjab Border). Project Road passesthrough Hanumangarh and Ganganagar districts of Rajasthan. The major settlementsalong the project corridor are Hanumangarh, Satipura, Rorawali, Dholipal, Kheruwala,Hathiyanwala, Kararwala. Length of Project Road in each district is given in Table 3.1below:

Table 3.1: Length of Project Road in the Influence Districts

Sl.No. Name of Districts

Location Length(Km) Percentage

From (Km) To (Km)1 Hanumangarh 0.000 28.000 28.0 Km. 65%2 Ganganagar 28.000 43.000 15.0 Km. 35%

Total 43.0 Km. 100%

3.1.1 Climate

HANUMANGARH DISTRICT

Hanumangarh climate is semi-dry, extremely hot during the summer and extremelycold during winter. The maximum average temperature remains 18° to 48° andminimum average is 2° to 28° celcius. Climate of hanumangarh district is very severeand arid. The average annual rainfall of the district is 235 mm, with excess and deficitrainfall in most of the years.

SH-7A

HanumangarhMarket

Abohar

HanumangarhCity

Abohar

Rajasthan / Punjab Border

Hanumangarh



GANGANAGAR DISTRICT

Ganganagar district has a dry desert climate, with large variations of temperature andscanty rainfall. In the Ganganagar district the variation in the minimum and maximumtemperature is perhaps greatest for any place in the world. Perhaps it is the only placein the world where temperature dips below sub-zero but does not have snowfall. Here,May and June are the hottest months with the mean yearly maximum temperature inthe hot season 41.2 degree Celsius and the mean yearly minimum temperature at about6.0 degree Celsius. Average annual rain fall is 250mm.

3.1.2 Terrain

Project Road is passing through plain terrain.

3.1.3 Land Use

Generally the horizontal alignment of the Project Road is mostly in rural area flared upwith barren/ agricultural land use. In the built-up areas both residential andcommercial buildings have developed abutting the project highway. A detail of the landuse pattern along the project road is given in Road Inventory, Appendix 3.1.

3.1.4 Carriageway and Roadway width

The detailed inventory on existing carriageway reveals that the project road stretchcomprises of two lane (2L) carriageway with 1 to 2 m gravel shoulder. Summary of laneconfiguration for the entire stretch is presented below in Table 3.2.

Table 3.2A: Summary of Lane Configuration

S. No.Existing Chainage

(In km) Length Lane ConfigurationFrom To km

1. 0 0.4 0.4 4 Lane (14.0m wide CC)2. 0.4 0.8 0.4 4 Lane (14.0m wide BT)



S. No.Existing Chainage

(In km) Length Lane ConfigurationFrom To km

3. 0.8 0.9 0.1 4 Lane (14.0m wide CC Block)4. 0.9 2.0 1.1 4 Lane (14.0m wide BT)5. 2.0 3.0 1 2 Lane Plus (10m wide BT)6. 3.0 7.0 4 2 Lane (7.0m wide BT )7. 7.0 7.5 0.5 2 Lane (7.0m wide CC )8. 7.5 17.2 9.7 2 Lane (7.0m wide BT )9. 17.2 17.5 0.3 2 Lane (7.0m wide CC )10. 17.5 38 20.5 2 Lane (7.0m wide BT )11. 38.0 38.15 0.15 2 Lane (7.0m wide CC )12. 38.15 42.655 4.505 2 Lane (7.0m wide BT )

Note: Complete project road is 2 lane configuration or higher.

3.1.5 Surfacing Type

The entire project road stretch has bituminous surface type pavement, except at followinglocations, where existing pavement is Cement Concrete. Table below presents the list ofsection where existing cement concrete pavement exists.

Table 3.2B: Cement Concrete Pavement Sections

S. No.Existing Chainage (In

km) Length Lane ConfigurationFrom To km

1. 0.0 0.4 0.4 4 Lane (14.0m wide CC)2. 0.8 0.9 0.1 4 Lane (14.0m wide CC)3. 7.0 7.5 0.5 2 Lane (7.0m wide CC )4. 17.2 17.5 0.3 2 Lane (7.0m wide CC )5. 38.0 38.15 0.15 2 Lane (7.0m wide CC )

Total Length 1.45 km

3.1.6 Shoulder

Shoulder width varies from 1 to 2m along the Project Road. The shoulder is in faircondition except at some locations.

3.1.7 Embankment Height

The average height of embankment varies from 0.0m to 0.5 m except at approaches to thebridges. Sections of the project road pass through the sections with country level higherthan the project road. Sand dunes on one and/or both side of the project road.

3.1.8 Right of Way

Consultant collected the revenue map and the revenue maps/records shows the existingRight of Way (ROW) is varying from a minimum of 24m to a maximum of 38m. Tablebelow list the details of the existing ROW along the project road. However pertinent to



mention that the land width (existing RoW) is sufficient for upgradation of project road to2-lane with gravel shoulder.

Table 3.3: Existing Right of Way (RoW)

S.No. Chainage Ex. RoW(in m)From (km) To (km)

1 0 1 292 1 2 293 2 3 294 3 4 305 4 5 316 5 6 277 6 7 288 7 8 269 8 9 36

10 9 10 3011 10 11 2612 11 12 2813 12 13 3114 13 14 3715 14 15 3616 15 16 2917 16 17 2918 17 18 3119 18 19 3820 19 20 3621 20 21 3222 21 22 3423 22 23 2924 23 24 2425 24 25 3026 25 26 2927 26 27 3528 27 28 3429 28 29 2730 29 30 2631 30 31 2932 31 32 2833 32 33 3734 33 34 2835 34 35 2936 35 36 3137 36 37 3038 37 38 3039 38 39 3340 39 40 3141 40 41 3142 41 42 3343 42 43 31



3.1.9 Built-Up and Semi-Built-Up

The villages and towns through which the project road traverses, along with thepopulation of village/town are listed in Table 3.3.

Table 3.3: Location of Built-Up

Sl.No. Built-Up Population

Existing ChainageFrom To

1 Hanumangarh 150,958 0.000 2.5002 Rodawali - 6.665 8.5003 Dholipal 1,149 17.000 18.7754 Hathiyawala 2,078 20.263 21.4055 Khairuwala 4,347 28.700 29.5506 Kararwala 1,889 37.270 38.3457 Gadder Khera (RJ/PB Border) 2,234 41.273 42.272

3.1.10 Side Drain

Road side drainage is not noticed in the rural sections of the road.

3.1.11 Horizontal Curves

The existing horizontal geometry of the entire section of the project road meets therequired standards stipulated by IRC. However it consists of sharp curves with poorgeometric at the builtup locations.

Toposervey Instruments - DGPS



3.1.12 Road Junctions

There are existing 19 junctions across the project road. Most of the minor junctions lead tothe nearby villages while major junctions connect the major highways/ roads leading tomajor cities of Rajasthan and Punjab. Details of all these major and minor junctions arepresented in Table 3.4A below.

Table 3.4: Location of Road Junctions

S.No.

Chainage(In Km.)

Type DirectionRemarks

╦/Y/╬ Towards Left Towards Right

1. 3.00 +Town Junction

Bypass Road (SH-7)

Sangaria Road SitapurJunction

2. 3.325 T Sureshiya -

3. 3.345 + Sureshiya(Colony Road) Sureshiya

4. 3.985 T - SubstationColony Road

5. 4.04 T - PolytechnicCollege

6. 4.595 + Sriganganagar Dabwali HanumangarhBypass Road

7. 4.967 T -8. 6.874 T Jorkiya -9. 10.45 T - Nochak10. 13.06 + Himawali Sampat Nagar

11. 18.17 T Dholipal RailwayStation Road -

12. 22.54 T Buglanwali -13. 23.56 T Singhpura RHS14. 28.69 T Budh Singhwala LHS15. 35.2 + Sadulshahar Sangaria Road16. 36.68 + Sadulshahar Nurpura17. 40.382 T Sadulshahar - RJ SH 7B18. 42.22 T Malot RHS

19. 42.55 T - Malot Sadulshaharto Malot Road

Note: In addition all the Black Top junctions shall be upgraded as per MoRT&H standards.



Fig 3.3: Major Junction along the of Project Road

Fig 3.4: Minor Junction along the Project Road

3.1.13 Road Signs

Informatory signs exist to guide the drivers along the highway from safety point of view.Road signs shall be provided as per IRC stipulations.

3.1.14 Pavement Condition Survey

Detailed field studies have been carried out to collect pavement/shoulder/drainageconditions and are presented in Appendix 3.2 Pavement Condition Survey.

Pavement Condition

Pavement condition survey was done primarily by visual observations supplementedby simple measurement for rut depth using a 3.0m straight edge. The rating system forpavement condition was done, with reference from IRC: 81-1997 (Clause 4.2.1). Acriterion for classification of pavement sections is given in Table 3.5.

Table 3.5: Criteria for Classification of Pavement Sections

Classification Pavement Condition

Good No cracking, rutting less than 10mm.

Fair No cracking or cracking confined to single crack in the wheel trackwith rutting between 10mm and 20mm.

Poor Extensive cracking less than 20% and/or rutting greater than 20mm



Classification Pavement ConditionVery Poor /

Failed Sections with cracking exceeding 20% (Need for Reconstruction)

The riding quality of the pavement visually varies from good to poor, general qualitybeing fair. Mostly two types of cracks were observed namely, longitudinal cracks andalligator cracks. Based on the criteria described in Table 3.5, about 12.0 km (28%) of theroad is found to be in good condition, while 28.5 km (66%) of the road is in faircondition. While the remaining 2.5 km (6%) of the road section has cracking between20% to 30% of the road section and hence adjudged as poor pavement.

The overall pavement condition is depicted graphically in Fig 3.6.

Fig 3.5: Road Condition/ Status

Fig 3.6: Pavement Condition

3.1.15 Shoulder Condition

Gravel shoulder is observed on both sides along the project road with varying widthbetween 1.0 to 2.0m. Out of 43.0km of the project road, 41 km (95.3%) of the earthenshoulder is in fair condition while the remaining 2 km (4.7%) of the road is in poorcondition.



3.1.16 Drainage Condition

Road side drainage is not noticed in the rural sections of the road. Sufficient camber existsto drain off the water from carriageway surface. There are

Ø 7 minor bridge and

Ø 56 culverts in 43.0 km length.

3.2 BENKELMAN BEAM DEFLECTION TECHNIQUE

The evaluation of structural strength of existing flexible pavement was carried out usinga Benkelman Beam in accordance with the procedure given in IRC:81-1997.

A standard truck having a rear axle weighing 8200kg fitted with dual tyre inflated to apressure of 5.60 kg/sq.cm was used for loading the pavement. The beam was calibratedusing metal plates of known thickness prior to testing. The dual wheels of the truck arecentered above the selected point.

Deflection surveys have been carried out as per the scheme given below:

· Main line surveys;

· Control section testing

The deflection tests for the main line have been carried out at one set of 10 readings in250m for every three km of the project road. The homogeneous sections have beencarried out for each 250m based on the data derived from pavement condition surveys.The deflection measurements for such homogeneous section were at an interval of 25m.Pavement temperature was recorded at every one hour during the testing period by athermometer (approximately 5 cm deep and 10 mm diameter hole) drilled in thepavement and filled with glycerol. At any deviation of the pavement temperatureduring measurements from the standard temperature of 35o C, correction has beenapplied to the deflection measured in accordance with the procedure described inIRC:81-1997. Seasonal correction was carried out using the moisture correction factorsgiven in Figures 2 to 7 in IRC:81-1997. PI and moisture content of the subgrade wereestablished from test pit excavations carried out simultaneously with the BenkelmanBeam tests. The Benkelman Beam Deflection data are presented in Table 3.6, thegraphical representation of the same is presented in Fig. 3.8. The detail analysis ispresented in Appendix 3.3.



0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

4 8 10 13 17 20 23 26 29 32 34 37 40

Characteristic Deflection

Chainage

Fig 3.7: View of BBD Survey at km 40+175

Table 3.6: Characteristic Deflection along the Project Road

TestSection

Chainage, Km CharacteristicDeflection (mm), Dc

From To Main Line1 04/000 04/250 1.712 08/000 08/250 2.063 10/000 10/250 2.194 13/000 13/225 2.015 17/000 17/250 1.976 20/000 20/225 1.897 23/000 23/225 1.928 26/000 26/225 1.839 29/000 29/225 2.0210 32/000 32/225 1.8111 34/000 34/225 1.3112 37/000 37/225 1.7713 40/000 40/225 1.46

Fig 3.8: Characteristic Deflection (mm) along the Project Road SH-7A

3.3 TRIAL PITS

The investigations were carried out along the existing road using trial pits made asunder:

Test Pit - 1.0m x 1.0m at every 3 Km or change of soil strata.

At small pit locations following information were collected:

· Pavement Composition

· Soil samples were collected for their Classification.



At Large pit locations following tests were conducted:

· Pavement Composition

· In-situ density test at sub-grade top by Core Cutter method

· Characterisation (grain size and Atterberg limits)

· Laboratory moisture-density characteristics

· Laboratory CBR (4-day soaked condition and swell)

3.3.1 Pavement Composition

For each test pit, the following information is recorded:

· Test pit reference (Identification number, location):

· Pavement composition (material type and thickness):

· Subgrade type (textural classification) and condition (dry, wet)

A broad variation in pavement thickness along the project road was observed. The

Bituminous part varies from 25mm to 125mm. While non-bituminous depth varies from

90mm to 400 mm. Pavement composition of the existing road is given in Table 3.7.

Table 3.7: Pavement Composition of the Existing Road

Sr. No. Test PitLocation Side Total

Bitumen, mmTotal Non-

Bitumen, mmTotal Depth,

mm1 3/000 L.H.S 50mm 210mm 2602 5/000 L.H.S 60mm 270mm 3303 8/600 R.H.S 50mm 290mm 340



Sr. No. Test PitLocation Side Total

Bitumen, mmTotal Non-

Bitumen, mmTotal Depth,

mm4 10/000 R.H.S 70mm 330mm 4105 13/000 L.H.S 65mm 290mm 3556 17/300 R.H.S 80mm 180mm 2607 20/000 L.H.S 55mm 240mm 2958 23/000 R.H.S 48mm 230mm 2789 26/000 L.H.S 52mm 245mm 297

10 29/000 R.H.S 55mm 245mm 30511 31/000 R.H.S 150mm 150mm 30012 34/800 R.H.S 70mm 255mm 32513 39/500 L.H.S 80mm 220mm 300

Note: Non bituminous layer is granular base / sub base & at places consist of bricksoling.

Field Surveys – being inspected by PWD Officials

Test pits in progress at Ch 20+000 Test pits in progress at Ch 20+000



3.3.2 Characterization of Subgrade

The details of all the tests carried out on subgrade for their Physical, Strength andStability Characteristics are given in Table 3.8.

Table 3.8: Different Tests carried out on Subgrade Soil

Sl. No. Test Parameters Method Reference1 Water Content IS:2720 (Part 2)2 Grain Size Analysis IS:2720 (Part 4)3 Atterberg Limits IS:2720 (Part 5)4 MDD-OMC(Compaction) IS:2720 (Part 8)5 CBR IS:2720 (Part 16)6 Free Swell Index IS:2720 (Part 40)

The test results of subgrade soils are summarized in Table 3.9.



Table 3.9: Test Results of Existing Subgrade Soil

Pit.No

ExistingChainage,

KmSide

% passing through I.S. Sieve % SandContent

Atterberg's LimitsClassification

as per I.S.-1498-1970

FreeSwellingIndex (%)

FieldMoisture

(%)

M.D.D.(gm/cc)

O.M.C. (%)

C.B.R. (%)In soakedcondition

4.75 mm 2.00mm

425mic. 75 mic L.L. P.L. P.I. Symbol

1 3/000 L.H.S 100.00 97.74 93.92 52.05 47.95 26.40 22.1 4.30 ML-CL 7.50 5.42 1.866 10.70 7.75

2 5/000 L.H.S 100.00 98.36 94.05 51.19 48.81 28.50 22 6.50 ML-CL 8.00 5.65 1.872 9.80 8.10

3 8/600 R.H.S 100.00 96.93 91.91 53.07 46.93 24.50 21.5 3.04 ML-CL 12.50 5.18 1.882 11.30 7.30

4 10/000 R.H.S 100.00 96.89 91.80 52.46 47.54 27.90 22.4 5.55 ML-CL 10.50 5.25 1.880 10.70 8.30

5 13/000 L.H.S 99.25 94.32 85.68 52.57 46.68 26.20 21.3 4.92 ML-CL 7.50 6.76 1.890 11.10 7.90

6 17/300 R.H.S 100.00 95.17 88.01 50.78 49.22 26.30 21.3 5.03 ML-CL 7.50 5.61 1.862 11.10 7.10

7 20/000 L.H.S 100.00 96.18 90.92 47.77 52.23 24.90 21.7 3.20 ML-CL 8.50 3.82 1.924 11.50 8.25

8 23/000 R.H.S 100.00 97.79 90.78 50.16 49.84 27.40 21.6 5.78 ML-CL 9.50 5.99 1.868 10.20 7.20

9 26/000 L.H.S 100.00 96.08 89.99 48.19 51.81 26.80 23.1 3.67 ML-CL 9.50 2.18 1.900 11.40 8.30

10 29/000 R.H.S 100.00 98.00 94.18 57.24 42.76 26.60 23.4 3.23 ML-CL 8.50 5.16 1.884 10.70 8.75

11 31/000 R.H.S 100.00 97.47 92.89 54.66 45.34 28.60 22.9 5.68 ML-CL 10.00 3.00 1.874 11.80 6.85

12 34/800 R.H.S 100.00 97.07 92.75 59.88 40.12 26.10 22.1 3.96 ML-CL 10.00 6.02 1.888 10.60 7.90

13 39/500 L.H.S 100.00 97.30 91.59 53.17 46.83 26.00 22.9 3.13 ML-CL 7.50 4.44 1.864 11.30 7.70



3.4 MATERIAL INVESTIGATIONS

The sources for material; metal quarry material and sand quarry have been identifiedaround the project area in Ganganagar and Bikaner Districts.

3.4.1 Borrow Area Soil

The borrow areas were identified in and around (not within ROW) and along theProject Road. The suitability of borrow material is established from laboratory testing.

Table 3.10: Details of Borrow Soil Location

Sl. No. Chainage Side1 9.200 RHS2 21.600 LHS3 33.100 RHS

The laboratory test results of borrow are samples is presented in Table 3.11.

Table 3.11: Test Results of Borrow Area Soil

ExistingChainage

Km

% passing through I.S. Sieve % SandContent

Atterberg's Limits

4.75 mm 2.00 mm 425 mic. 75 mic L.L. P.L. P.I.

9.200 100.00 98.35 91.88 48.35 51.65 21.40 - NP

21.600 100.00 99.06 93.74 46.72 53.28 23.60 - NP

33.100 100.00 98.67 92.88 41.89 58.11 22..30 - NP

ExistingChainage

Km

Classificationas per I.S.-1498-1970

FreeSwellingIndex (%)

FieldMoisture

(%)

M.D.D.(gm/cc) O.M.C. (%)

C.B.R. (%) Insoaked

condition

9.200 NP 0.00 5.12 1.915 10.80 10.66

21.600 NP 0.00 4.87 1.896 11.30 10.01

33.100 NP 0.00 5.50 1.921 10.40 11.15

As 90 percentile of the borrow area samples has CBR value greater than 10%. Hence forpavement design CBR value adopted is 10%.

3.4.2 Sand Quarry

Sources of natural sand have been primarily identified for construction works and aregiven in Table 3.12. Sand samples collected from these sources were sent to thelaboratory for grain size analysis and determination of their zoning and finenessmodulus.

Table 3.12: Lists of Source of Materials

Sl. No. Location District State1 Pimpad Churu Rajasthan



3.4.3 Aggregates

The aggregates to be used for the project are from Government approved quarries in theproject vicinity from Ganganagar and Hanumangarh district. The Quarry chart ispresented below as Fig 3.10.

Fig 3.9: Quarry Chart for Project Road

3.5 INVENTORY AND CONDITION SURVEY OF BRIDGES AND CULVERTS

There are 7 minor bridges and 56 culverts in 43.0 km stretch of project road. Details ofexisting culverts and bridges are presented in Appendix 3.4 and Appendix 3.5respectively. The no. of existing bridge and culverts is presented below in Table 3.13.Detailed development proposal of the additional culverts are given in Chapter-5:Improvement / Upgrading Proposals.

Table 3.13: Summary of Existing Bridges and Culverts

Sl. No.Bridges Culverts

CausewayMajor Minor Pipe Slab Arch

1 Nil 7 8 48 Nil Nil

List of Minor Bridge along with the span arrangement & width of carriageway ispresented in table below.

S. No. Chainage(In Km) Type of Structure No. of Spans

(m) Width (m)

1. 5.110 RCC Solid Slab 3 X 4.2 7.22. 9.980 RCC Solid Slab 2 X 5.6 12.03. 16.410 RCC Solid Slab 2 X 4.0 12.0



S. No. Chainage(In Km) Type of Structure No. of Spans

(m) Width (m)

4. 22.150 RCC Solid Slab 2 X 3.2 12.05. 40.260 RCC Solid Slab 2 X 3.9 7.06. 41.530 RCC Solid Slab 2 X 3.8 7.07. 42.520 RCC Solid Slab 5 X 11.5 8.0

Condition survey of bridge is presented in Appendix 3.6.

Minor Bridget at km 5+100 Minor Bridge at km 42+520

3.6 RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING

The project road crosses railway tracks at one location as level crossing. The summaryof existing level crossing is given below:


Sl.No. Location TrackDetails TVU Data Remarks

1 2.965(C-66) BG (Single) 1,39,089,

30 March 2014

As per IRC 62-1976 the TVUis more than 50,000 and

requires ROB construction



Fig 3.10: Railway Crossing along the Project Road at Km 2.965

As per June 2013 data, the Railway Crossing Ch. 2/965 serves 139,089 TVU.

Fig 3.11: Plan showing Railway Crossing along the Project Road at Km 2.965

Satipura Railway Crossing(Single Track Non-Electrified)

Cross Road very near to Satipura Rly XingGurudwara close to the junction

Project Road

Railway Xing

133 KV Sub Station


Final Feasibility Report, Sep 2015 4 - i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER – 4: TRAFFIC SURVEY & ANALYSIS .................................................................... 34.1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 34.2. STUDY OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................. 3

4.3. IDENTIFICATION OF HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS (HS) ................................ 3

4.4. CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT ........................................................... 4

4.5. DATA ANALYSIS – Classified Traffic Volume Count .......................................... 5

4.6. AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) ................................................. 7

4.7. DATA ANALYSIS – Origin Destination Survey .................................................... 9

4.8. AXLE LOAD SURVEY ........................................................................................... 13

4.9. GROWTH RATE ..................................................................................................... 14

4.10. CAPACITY ANALYSIS.......................................................................................... 17

4.11. MILLION STANDARD AXLES (MSA) ................................................................ 184.12. TOLLING HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS ............................................................ 18


Final Feasibility Report, Sep 2015 4 - ii


Table 4.1: Traffic Homogenous Sections ....................................................................................... 3

Table 4.2: Traffic Survey Locations and Schedules ...................................................................... 3

Figure 4.1: Survey Location Map................................................................................................... 4

Table 4.3: Classification of Vehicles for Traffic Surveys .............................................................. 5

Table 4.4: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) ........................................................................................ 6Figure 4.2: Traffic Variation (in ADT) at both Locations ............................................................. 7

Table 4.5: Season Correction Factor (SCF) Based on Diesel Sales Data ...................................... 8

Table 4.6: Vehicle-wise SCF to be adopted ................................................................................... 8

Table 4.7: Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) ........................................................................ 9

Table 4.8: Traffic Zoning System ................................................................................................. 10

Table 4.9: Commodity Distribution............................................................................................. 10

Figure 4.3: Commodity Distribution Chart ................................................................................ 11

Table 4.10: Load Distribution of Freight Vehicles ...................................................................... 11

Figure 4.4: Load Distributions of Goods Vehicles ...................................................................... 12

Table 4.11: Average Load by Vehicle Types ............................................................................... 12Table 4.12: Major OD Pairs – Passenger Vehicles ...................................................................... 12

Table 4.13: Major OD Pairs – Freight Vehicles ........................................................................... 13

Table 4.14: Major Traffic Generators ........................................................................................... 13

Table 4.15: Adopted Vehicle Damage Factors ............................................................................ 14

Table 4.16: State Representation on the Project Road ................................................................ 14Table 4.17: Registered Motor Vehicles in PIA ............................................................................ 15

Table 4.18: Growth in NSDP states in PIA .................................................................................. 15

Table 4.19: Elasticity Calculated by graphical method .............................................................. 15

Figure 4.5: Elasticity Chart ........................................................................................................... 16Table 4.20: Forecasted Growth Rates .......................................................................................... 16

Table 4.21: Traffic Projection (PCUs)........................................................................................... 17

Table 4.22: Summary of Calculated MSA ................................................................................... 18

Table 4.23: Tolling Homogeneous Sections ................................................................................ 18



CHAPTER–4:TRAFFICSURVEY&ANALYSIS

4.1. BACKGROUND

The Project Road (SH-7A) starts from Hanumangarh (Km. 0.000) and ends at Abohar(km 43.000) (Rajasthan/ Punjab Border). Project Road passes through Hanumangarhand Ganganagar districts of Rajasthan. The major settlements along the projectcorridor are Hanumangarh, Satipura, Dholipal, Kheruwala, Hathiyanwala,Kararwala.Km 0.0 to km 43.0 of SH-7A comprising the section from Hanumangarh to Abohar(upto Punjab border) (the Highway – III)

4.2. STUDY OBJECTIVEFor making the proper assessment of traffic volume, base year traffic and itsprojection, Consultants, M/s AECOM have carried out the necessary traffic surveysand investigations. The base year traffic data is the primary input for determinationof future traffic demand. With a view to estimate the base year traffic volume inrespect of goods and passenger carrying vehicles, the Classified Traffic VolumeCount (CTVC) surveys, Origin and Destination survey and Axle Load survey wereconducted. For the purpose of traffic estimation and projections the year 2014-15 hasbeen taken as the base year.

4.3. IDENTIFICATION OF HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS (HS)

The project road has been divided into two homogenous sections with respect tovariation in traffic volume based on location of major intersections & majorsettlements. These homogenous sections are given in Table 4.1 below:

Table 4.1: Traffic Homogenous Sections

HomogenousSection # From km to km Length

(km) Remarks

HS-1 0+000 to 17+000 17 Hanumangarh to Dholipal

HS-2 17+000 to 43+000 26 Dholipal to Sadulshahar(Upto Abohar Border)

Based on the homogenous sections proposed above, traffic survey has beenperformed at locations and schedule mentioned in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2: Traffic Survey Locations and Schedules

Location Duration Date of Survey Remarks

Classified Traffic Volume Count

Km 8+000 7 Days x 24Hours

22-Aug to 29-Aug-2014&

7-Mar to 14-Mar-2015

Near Raodawali

Km 28+300 Near Khairuwala

Axle Load & OD Survey

km 28+300 1 Day 22nd Aug 2014 Near Khairuwala



4.4. CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTThe Classified Traffic Volume Count is carried out at 7 locations in the month of

· I Count in Aug 2014 (from 22-Aug-2014 to 29-Aug-2014) and

· II Count in Mar 2015 (from 7-Mar-2015 to 14-Mar-2015)

The Classified Traffic Volume Count is carried out at 2 locations twice. The vehicleclassification was done as per IRC: SP 19-1991 and IRC: 9-1972 code requirementsand vehicle category added/revised as per the change in tolling policy.

Figure 4.1: Survey Location Map

OD & Axle Load Survey

Classified Traffic Count

RJ/PB bor.

Hanumangarh

Dholipal

Sadulsahar



The purpose of the survey is to calculate the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on all thetraffic homogeneous sections and to convert the traffic into PCU, for CapacityAnalysis and fixing of concession period. Vehicle classification and PCU factorsadopted are presented in Table 4.3 below.

Table 4.3: Classification of Vehicles for Traffic Surveys

Vehicle Type PCU FactorMotorized Vehicle

· 2-Wheeler 0.5· 3-Wheeler 1· Passenger Car and Utility Vehicle 1· Bus (Mini Bus) 1.5· Bus (Standard Bus) 3· Light Commercial Vehicle (Freight) 1.5· Truck§ MCV (2-axle Rigid Chassis) 3§ HCV (3-Axle Rigid Chassis) 3§ HCV (4-6 Axle trucks) 4.5§ HCV (>6 axle trucks) 4.5§ EME & HCM 4.5

· Agricultural Tractors (with trailer) 4.5· Agricultural Tractors (without trailer) 1.5

Non-Motorized Vehicle· Cycle 0.5· Cycle Rickshaw 2· Animal Drawn Vehicle 6

4.5. DATA ANALYSIS – Classified Traffic Volume Count

Under the present study, manually 7 days traffic volume counts were carried out at 2locations twice.

· I Count in Aug 2014 (from 22-Aug-2014 to 29-Aug-2014) and

· II Count in Mar 2015 (from 7-Mar-2015 to 14-Mar-2015)

Survey was done round-the-clock 24X7 at all 2 locations. The survey stations havebeen located away from urban agglomerations and villages to minimize interferenceof local traffic. The summary of daily traffic count at all survey locations is presentedbelow in Table 4.4. For details refer Appendix 4.1



Table 4.4: Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

Vehicle Type PCUFactor

km 08+000 km 28+300

1stCount

2ndCount Average 1st

Count2nd

Count Average

Car 1 1256 1780 1518 1128 1485 1306

Mini Bus 1.5 22 12 17 21 17 19

Standard Bus 3 134 112 123 145 125 135

LCV 1.5 64 55 60 88 70 79

2-Axle 3 21 12 17 46 66 56

3-Axle 3 103 132 118 138 136 137

MAV (4 to 6) 4.5 93 111 102 99 123 111

ADT Tolled 1693 2214 1954 1665 2022 1843

PCU Tolled 2578 3148 2863 2724 3150 2937

2-Wheeler 0.5 2374 2143 2259 1388 1309 1349

3- Wheeler 1 122 63 93 50 15 33

Tractors with trailer 4.5 419 183 301 135 171 153Tractors without

trailer 1.5 82 12 47 66 85 76

Cycles 0.5 85 59 72 67 125 96

Cycle Rickshaw 2 11 2 7 12 1 7

Animal-Cart 6 37 35 36 31 11 21

ADT Non Tolled 3130 2497 2814 1749 1717 1733

PCU Non Tolled 3604 2220 2912 1694 1697 1696

Exempted Car 1 147 205 176 132 172 152

Exempted LCV 1.5 7 0 4 5 0 3

Exempted Truck 3 11 8 10 5 6 6

ADT Exempted 165 213 189 142 178 160

PCU Exempted 190 229 209 155 190 172

ADT Total 4988 4924 4956 3556 3917 3737

PCU Total 6372 5597 5984 4573 5037 4805

Percentage Non-Tolled 60% 44% 52% 40% 37% 39%



Figure 4.2: Traffic Variation (in ADT) at both Locations

4.6. AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT)For the purpose of analysis the traffic data is needed in Average Annual Daily Traffic(AADT) terms. This is arrived at by incorporating the seasonal variations in trafficmovement on Project Roads. Thus, in order to capture the seasonality in trafficmovement, consultant collected the petrol and diesel sales data from petrol pumpsalong the Project Road. Table 4.5 presents the monthly variation in sales of diesel &Petrol data and the calculated SCF.

Car/ Taxi M Bus Bus LCV 2-Axle 3-Axle MAVkm 08+000 1518 17 123 60 17 118 102km 28+300 1306 19 135 79 56 137 111

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Traf

fic(A

DT)

Traffic Variation at both Locations



Table 4.5: Season Correction Factor (SCF) Based on Diesel Sales Data

MonthDiesel Sale SCF

DieselPetrol Sale SCF

Petrol2012-13 2013-14 2012-13 2013-14April 690000 758000 0.84 10000 15000 1.26May 872000 872000 0.70 20000 20000 0.75June 645000 740000 0.88 15000 15000 1.00

July 596000 637000 0.98 20000 21000 0.73August 420000 506000 1.32 20000 10000 1.12September 456000 569000 1.20 20000 15000 0.87

October 710000 836000 0.79 10000 15000 1.26November 730000 737000 0.83 10000 15000 1.26

December 697000 565000 0.97 15000 15000 1.00January 524000 390000 1.36 15000 10000 1.25February 414000 270000 1.86 15000 10000 1.25

March 509000 405000 1.34 15000 15000 1.00

Average 605250 607083 1.00 15417 14667 1.00

1st Survey is conducted in month of August. Considering the monsoon season of fourmonths from July to October, SCF value is taken as average of these four months.Similarly the 2nd count is conducted in the month March hence SCF is calculated forthe month from March to May, SCF value is taken as average of these three monthssummarizing the seasonal correction factor applicable on different vehicle categoriesis presented in Table 4.6.

Table 4.6: Vehicle-wise SCF to be adopted

Sr. No. Vehicle

Seasonal Correction Factor(SCF) Remark

SCF- Aug SCF - Mar

1 Car 1.05 0.97 Assuming 30% Petrol & 70%Diesel Running Cars

2 Bus 1.07 0.96 100% Diesel Running Buses

3 Truck 1.07 0.96 100% Diesel Running Trucks

Based on the SCF values adopted for different types of vehicles, AADT values arecalculated. Categorization of vehicles as per the types mentioned in the toll policy ispresented in Table 4.7 below



Table 4.7: Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT)

Location km 8 km 28Car, Jeep, Van or Light Motor Vehicle 1523 1312

Tractor with trolley carrying non-agricultural produce 0 0

Light Commercial Vehicle, Mini Bus 79 100Bus 125 138

2-Axle Truck 17 563-Axle Truck 118 139

HCM or EME or Multi Axle Vehicle (MAV)(4 to 6 axles) 103 112

Oversized Vehicles (>7axle) 0 0

Tollable PCUs 2887 2965

Non Tollable PCUs 3193 1885

Total PCUs 6080 4850

Linear chart below presents the distribution of the traffic homogeneous sectionsalong with the major built-ups and major junctions influencing the traffic.



4.7. DATA ANALYSIS – Origin Destination SurveyDuring the OD survey all the relevant information was collected from the vehicleoperators in pre-designed format by stopping vehicles at random sample basis. Thecollected data includes vehicle number, origin and destination place, commoditycarried, distance traveled etc.

4.7.1 Zoning System

For analysis of O-D data and preparation of trip tables for studying the regionalinteraction, a zoning system was developed. Project influence area and tripgenerating and attraction points were the major consideration while developingzoning system. In all, a 10-zone system was developed. Out of which, 3 are internalzones (zones falling along the project corridor) and 2 are intermediate zones (zonesfalling with in the State) remaining zones are external. The list of traffic zones ispresented in Table 4.8.

Table 4.8: Traffic Zoning System

Sr.no Zone .no Zone Name Zone Type1 101 Hanumangarh

Internal Zones2 102 Khairuwala,Dholipal3 103 Abohar,Sadul, Hatyawala4 201 Sri Ganganagar, matili Intermediate Zones5 202 Rest of Rajasthan6 301 Punjab

External Zones7 302 Jammu/Himachal8 303 Haryana9 304 MP/Gujarat

10 305 South India

4.7.2 Goods Vehicles – Commodity AnalysisDifferent commodities recorded during the O-D survey were classified into 10categories. Due consideration has been given to include all possible commoditiesmoving along the Project Road.

Commodity pattern shows prominent movement of building materials, householditems and food items along the Project Road. Distribution of various commodities ispresented in Table 4.9 and is graphically presented in Figure 4. below.

Table 4.9: Commodity Distribution

Type of Commodity % DistributionAnimal Food 1%Automobiles & machines 4%Building Material 31%

Food Grains 9%Food items 14%Household items 21%



Type of Commodity % DistributionOther 14%Petroleum Product 1%Wooden products 1%Stationary 3%

Figure 4.3: Commodity Distribution Chart

4.7.3 Goods Vehicles – Load Analysis

Survey data is analyzed to assess the load distribution for goods vehicles. The Loaddistribution observed for different vehicle types is grouped into various ranges. Theload distribution is shown in Table 4.10 and is graphically represented in Figure 4.4.

Table 4.10: Load Distribution of Freight Vehicles

Gross VehicleWeight (Tonnes) 2 / 3 Axle MAV Remarks

<12.5 37% 19% No Overloading

12.5 to 20 8% 0% No Overloading

20 to 25 11% 4% Overloading in 2Axle Trucks

25 to 60 45% 73% Overloading in 3 Axle Trucks

>60 0% 4% Overloading in 4-6 Axle Trucks

Animal Food2%

Automobiles &machines

4%

BuildingMaterial

31%

Food Grains9%

Food items14%

Householditems21%

Other14%

PetroliumProduct

1%

Woodenproducts

1%

Stationary3%

Commodity Distribution



Analysis shows that 45% of 3 Axle trucks moving along the Project Road are over-loaded. Overloading is also seen in 2 Axle trucks with 11% and 4% of multi Axletrucks being over-loaded.

Figure 4.4: Load Distributions of Goods Vehicles

The average and maximum Load for freight vehicles is given in Table 4.11.

Table 4.11: Average Load by Vehicle Types

4.7.4 Major OD Pairs

For a comprehensive study, goods and passenger vehicles at all the stations weregrouped, to work out the major O-D movements along the Project Road. Table 4.12through Table 4.14 below present the same. For details refer Appendix 4.2

Table 4.12: Major OD Pairs – Passenger Vehicles

Major OD Pairs -Passenger Percentage

AboharRest of Rajasthan 7%Punjab 3%

Hanumangarh

Abohar 46%Sri Ganganagar 6%Rest of Rajasthan 4%Punjab 6%

Khairuwala Abohar 21%Sri Ganganagar 3%

37%

8%

11%

45%

0%

19%

0%

4%

73%

4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

<12.5

12.5 to 20

20 to 25

25 to 60

>60

Load

inTo

nnes

Load Distribution Chart

MAV 2 / 3 Axle

VehicleAvg. Load (Tones)

Inclusive Empty Haulage Max. Load Passed

2/3-Axle 25 60

4-6 Axle 34 63



Table 4.13: Major OD Pairs – Freight Vehicles

Major OD Pairs -Goods PercentageAbohar Hanumangarh 27%

Jammu/Himachal Hanumangarh 5%Rest of Rajasthan 14%

MP/GujaratSri Ganganagar 1%Punjab 5%Jammu/Himachal 2%

PunjabHanumangarh 8%Rest of Rajasthan 16%

South India Sri Ganganagar 7%

Sri GanganagarHanumangarh 4%Abohar 7%Sri Ganganagar 1%

Table 4.14: Influence Factor

Zones Goods Vehicles Passenger VehiclesHanumangarh 23% 32%Khairuwala,Dholipal 0% 13%Abohar,Sadul,Hatyawala 17% 39%Sri Ganganagar, matili 2% 4%Rest of Rajasthan 21% 6%Punjab 18% 5%Jammu/Himachal 10% 0%Haryana 1% 0%MP/Gujarat 5% 0%South India 3% 0%

4.8. AXLE LOAD SURVEYAxle load survey was conducted at km 28+3000 to estimate vehicle damage factor(VDF). Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) is required in the design of overlays onexisting pavement and new pavement design for Additional Lanes/ Widening/Realignment/ Reconstruction.

4.8.1 Analysis For Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF)

VDF is a multiplier for converting the number of commercial vehicles of differentaxle loads to the number of standard axle load repetitions. Design of new pavementfor Additional Lanes/Widening/New Construction/Reconstruction orstrengthening of existing pavement is based upon the cumulative number of 8.16tonne Equivalent Standard Axles (ESA) that will pass over during the design period.The VDF values are used in calculating the design traffic (in MSA) for pavementdesign. Adopted VDF for calculating the MSA are given in Table 4.15. For detailsRefer Appendix 4.3



Table 4.15: Analysed Vehicle Damage Factors

km-28+300 BUS LCV 2AV 3AV 4-6 AV

VDF - CAlculated 0.97 0.81 4.53 4.53 13.34

As per clause 5.5.5 of manual, concessionaire with better enforcement can consider thelower VDF values. Accordingly the consultant has assumed the VDF value of 4.5 forCommercial vehicles. Clause 5.5.5 as presented in the manual is presented for readyreference.

Hence based on the above mentioned clause the adopted VDF is presentedbelow.

LocationAdopted VDF

Bus LCV Trucks

Km 28.300 0.97 0.81 4.5

4.9. GROWTH RATE4.9.1 Growth Rate (Forecasted)

The PR falls in average NSDP region of the country. The PIA covers the Rajasthan,Punjab, Delhi & Haryana State predominantly.

Table 4.16: State Representation on the Project Road

Vehicle Type RJ PB DL HRCar 50% 24% 15% 10%Bus 100% 0% 0% 0%LCV 88% 13% 0% 0%

Trucks 74% 26% 0% 0% The actual achieved growth in registered motor vehicle in the PIA is presentedbelow.



Ø The registered motor vehicle of the states in the PIA, are weighted in the ratioof their influence in each category of vehicle are presented below.

Table 4.17: Registered Motor Vehicles in PIA

Year Cars/ Jeep Buses LCV Trucks

2007-08 7,56,777 65,605 33,099 2,20,477

2008-09 8,30,745 69,298 37,344 2,33,208

2009-10 9,16,807 73,257 40,014 2,53,574

2010-11 10,17,761 77,980 42,912 2,80,835

2011-12 11,06,742 83,345 46,217 3,15,134 The actual achieved growth in NSDP in the PIA is presented below.

Table 4.18: Growth in NSDP states in PIA

Year NSDP RJ NSDP PB NSDP HR2006-07 13,43,50,00,00,000 10,00,72,00,00,000 10,47,05,00,00,000

Year on Year Growth2007-08 5% 9% 8%2008-09 8% 6% 8%2009-10 5% 6% 12%2010-11 11% 7% 10%2011-12 11% 6% 8%

Hence the expected growth rate on the PR or PIA is projected considering the NSDPof Rajasthan and elasticity as calculated from previous year Registered motorvehicles & NSDP (Rajasthan)

Elasticity Calculation

Based on the last 5 years vehicle registration data of PIA and the NSDP data of PIA,the Elasticity is calculated as per the figure below.

Table 4.19: Elasticity Calculated by graphical method

Vehicle Category Elasticity (Calculated) R- Square ValueCar 1.1365 0.9929

Buses 0.6984 0.9921LCV 0.9616 0.9595

Trucks 1.1310 0.9940



Figure 4.5: Elasticity Chart

To assess the future trend of growth of the traffic on the PR consultant projected theNSDP on the Rajasthan for the last 4 years average is considered as the future NSDPfor next 3 years and further a decreasing NSDP by 1% after every 5 year block,however to account for the increase in trips/development due to the improvedfacility (after construction) consultant have assumed higher elasticity for first 5 yearsafter completion of project.

Table 4.20: Forecasted Growth Rates

Year Car Buses LCV Trucks

2014-15 to 2016-17 7.2% 4.4% 6.1% 7.1%

2017-18 to 2021-22 6.5% 4.0% 4.5% 6.4%

2022-23 to 2026-27 4.3% 3.3% 4.5% 4.3%

>2027-28 4.0% 3.1% 4.2% 4.0%

Note: The overall CAGR is less than the minimum 5% growth rate proposed inManual. Hence consultant adopted 5% constant growth rate for the projection andMSA calculations.

Car = 1.1365x - 18.142R² = 0.9929

Bus = 0.6984x - 8.44R² = 0.9921

LCV = 0.9616x - 16.429R² = 0.9595

Trucks = 1.131x - 19.275R² = 0.994

9.50

10.00

10.50

11.00

11.50

12.00

12.50

13.00

13.50

14.00

14.50

27.85 27.90 27.95 28.00 28.05 28.10 28.15 28.20 28.25 28.30 28.35

Elasticity Calculation

Car Bus LCV Trucks



4.10. CAPACITY ANALYSIS

4.10.1 Traffic Projection

The traffic (AADT) at both survey locations is projected to analyses the concessionperiod based on the traffic capacity parameters. Maximum capacity for 2Lane (7.00m)is considered as 15,000 PCUs based on Standard Capacities for roads in Rajasthan,approved by Cabinet Note of Govt. of Rajasthan.

Table 4.21: Traffic Projection (PCUs)

Vehicle Type km 08+000 km 28+000(Proposed TP) Average Remarks

Year 2014-15 6080 4850 5465 Base YearYear 2015-16 6384 5093 5738 Year 1Year 2016-17 6703 5347 6025 Year 2Year 2017-18 7038 5615 6326 Year 3Year 2018-19 7390 5895 6643 Year 4Year 2019-20 7759 6190 6975 Year 5Year 2020-21 8147 6500 7323 Year 6Year 2021-22 8555 6825 7690 Year 7Year 2022-23 8982 7166 8074 Year 8Year 2023-24 9431 7524 8478 Year 9Year 2024-25 9903 7900 8902 Year 10Year 2025-26 10398 8295 9347 Year 11Year 2026-27 10918 8710 9814 Year 12Year 2027-28 11464 9146 10305 Year 13Year 2028-29 12037 9603 10820 Year 14Year 2029-30 12639 10083 11361 Year 15Year 2030-31 13271 10587 11929 Year 16Year 2031-32 13934 11117 12526 Year 17Year 2032-33 14631 11672 13152 Year 18Year 2033-34 15363 12256 13809 Year 19Year 2034-35 16131 12869 14500 Year 20Year 2035-36 16937 13512 15225 Exceed 2L LOS-BYear 2036-37 17784 14188 15986 Year 22Year 2037-38 18674 14897 16785 Year 23Year 2038-39 19607 15642 17625 Year 24Year 2039-40 20588 16424 18506 2L+PS (LOS-B)Year 2040-41 21617 17246 19431 Year 26Year 2041-42 22698 18108 20403 Year 27Year 2042-43 23833 19013 21423 Year 28Year 2043-44 25024 19964 22494 Year 29Year 2044-45 26276 20962 23619 Year 30

Growth rate of 5% is considered for all types of vehicles

Hence maximum concession period of 21 years can be considered at LOS-B.



4.11. MILLION STANDARD AXLES (MSA)

Design method considers traffic in terms of the cumulative number of standard axles(8160 kg) to be carried by the pavement during the design life.

The project road has been divided into two homogenous sections with respect tovariation in traffic volume based on location of major intersections & majorsettlements. Design Traffic in MSA for 15 years is tabulated below. For details ReferAppendix 4.4

Table 4.22: Summary of Calculated MSA

HomogenousSection # From km to km Length 15 Years Adopted

MSA

HS 1 Hanumangarh km 0+000 toDholipal km 17+000 17.0 9.5

20HS 2

Dholipal km 17+000 toSadulshahar (Upto Abohar

Border) km 43+00026.0 12.1

Note: As per Clause 5.4.1 of IRC:SP 73-2015, design traffic shall not be less than 20msa.

4.12. TOLLING HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS

Based on the traffic and tolling policy of Government of Rajasthan only one toll plazais proposed for the Project Highway presented below:

Table 4.23: Tolling Homogeneous Sections

S.No. Location TollingLength Reason for Selection

1 Km 28+300 43.0 km Between Hanumangarh km 0+000 andAbohar (up to HR Border) km 43+000



TABLE OF CONTENT

CHAPTER-5: IMPROVEMENT / UPGRADING PROPOSALS ....................................................................... 3

5.1 GENERAL ...............................................................................................................................................3

5.2 GEOMETRIC DESIGN PROPOSALS ....................................................................................................3

5.2.1 Improvement to Cross-sectional Elements ................................................................ 3

5.2.2 Development Scheme .................................................................................................. 4

5.2.3 Alignment Design........................................................................................................ 6

5.3 PROPOSAL FOR BYPASSES AND REALIGNMENTS ........................................................................6

5.4 PAVEMENT OPTIONS ..........................................................................................................................7

5.4.1 IRC: 37-2012 Method of Flexible Pavement Design for new construction .............. 7

5.4.2 IRC: 81-1997 Method of Overlay Design for overlay of existing pavements .......... 7

5.4.3 IRC: 58-2011 Method of Rigid Pavement Design – For Toll Plaza locations ........... 8

5.5 DESIGN ...................................................................................................................................................9

5.5.1 Details of Junctions Improvement Proposal .............................................................. 9

5.5.2 Design of Bridges and Cross-Drainage Structures .................................................... 9

5.5.3 Longitudinal Drains ...................................................................................................11

5.5.4 Improvement Proposal of Railway Level Crossings................................................11

5.6 ROAD FURNITURE AND OTHER FEATURES................................................................................. 11

5.6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................11

5.6.2 Bus Shelters .................................................................................................................11

5.6.3 Overhead Traffic Signs ...............................................................................................12

5.6.4 Road Markings ...........................................................................................................12

5.6.5 Cautionary, Mandatory and Informatory Signs.......................................................12

5.6.6 Kilometer Stone Details ..............................................................................................12

5.6.7 200m Stones ................................................................................................................13

5.7 DESIGN OF TOLL PLAZA .................................................................................................................. 13

5.7.1 Toll lanes .....................................................................................................................13



LIST OF TABLES

Table 5.1: Tentative Development Scheme .............................................................................................. 4

Table 5.2: Existing km Stone Vs Design Chainage................................................................................... 5

Table 5.3: Summary of Development Scheme.......................................................................................... 6

Table 5.4: Pavement Design Methods ...................................................................................................... 7

Table 5.5: Pavement Design (IRC 37) ...................................................................................................... 7

Table 5.6: Proposed Overlay Thicknesses on Existing Lane as per IRC:81-1997 ...................................... 8

Table 5.7: Recommended Temperature Differentials for Concrete ........................................................... 9

Table 5.8: Proposed Rigid Pavement thickness at all Toll Plaza Locations ............................................... 9

Table 5.9: Summary of Development of Existing Minor Bridge ............................................................... 9

Table 5.10: Summary of Development of Culverts ..................................................................................10

Table 5.11: Summary of Existing Level Crossings ..................................................................................11

Table 5.12: List of proposed Bus Shelter Locations ................................................................................11

Table 5.13: List of Overhead Traffic Signs .............................................................................................12



CHAPTER-5: IMPROVEMENT / UPGRADING PROPOSALS

5.1 GENERAL

This chapter is intended to give brief descriptions concerning the various improvementproposals for the up-gradation of existing two lane carriageway facility of 43.000 Kmlong (Design length 42.655) Hanumangarh-Abohar section of SH-7A to two lanecarriageway. The improvement proposal is based on the findings from variousengineering surveys and investigations carried out on the project road section and asdiscussed in Chapter 3: Engineering Survey and Investigation and Chapter 4: TrafficSurvey and Analysis.

2-lane with 2.5m gravel shoulder (both side) is proposed for the Project Road section.All the proposals are in conformity with the provisions of IRC: SP: 73-2007.

Improvement proposals for a highway essentially consist of two components, viz.Geometric and Structural. Geometric improvement deals with visible dimensions ofroadway and is dictated by the traffic and economic considerations. Geometric designinvolves several design elements such as horizontal and vertical alignments, sightdistance considerations, cross sectional elements, lateral and vertical clearances,intersection treatment, control of access, etc.

The structural component deals with the pavement and embankment design aspects, i.e.the ability of the highway to adequately carry and support the vehicle / wheel loadsover the design period.

The improvement proposals for the proposed upgradation & widening to 2-lane withgravel shoulder configuration system includes the provision for the following majoritems:

· Geometric Improvements and realignments· Pavement· Road Junctions· Bridges and Cross-Drainage Structures· Safety and· Road Appurtenances

5.2 GEOMETRIC DESIGN PROPOSALS

The proposal for the improvement of the geometric elements of the existing StateHighway includes:

· Improvement to the cross-sectional elements

· Alignment Design

5.2.1 Improvement to Cross-sectional Elements

Proposed Cross Sectional Elements

Lane Width

The width of a basic traffic lane is proposed to be 3.50m. Thus, for 2-lane, thecarriageway width shall be 7.0m.

Gravel Shoulders2.5m wide gravel shoulder is proposed on both sides of carriageway.



Cross-fall

The cross-fall for the pavement & gravel shoulder will be 2.5% with a crown in thecentre. The cross-fall for granular shoulder will be 3%.

Proposed ROW

The proposed development shall be constructed within the available Right of Way(ROW). Existing RoW varies from 24m to 38m with average RoW of >30m.

Typical Cross Section

The typical cross sections to be followed in the Project stretch are detailed in Volume-2:Drawings.

5.2.2 Development Scheme

The existing project road section of SH-7A has multi-dimensional facets with respect toland use and road geometry and considering all these aspects the section-wise policyadopted for development based on the investigations is given in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1: Tentative Development Scheme

Sl.No.

Existing Km.Stone

ExistingLength

(m)TCS Description

From To

1. 0.000 3.000 3.000 A

No upgradation except maintenance isproposed with safety measures like railing atexisting median, repair of median and repairof drain.

2. 3.000 7.000 4.000 I 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m)

3. 7.000 7.500 0.500 V 2 Lane Overlay (CC) only(Existing 7.0m )(Built-up section)


5. 14.000 15.500 1.500 II 2 Lane reconstruction in BTstretches(Existing 7m)




9. 21.500 22.500 1.000 II 2 Lane reconstruction in BTstretches(Existing 7m)

10. 22.500 23.500 1.000 IV 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) (Built-upsection) (New construction)

11. 23.500 28.000 4.500 III 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) (Ruralsection) (New construction)




42.655



Chainage Reference

The existing km stone available on ground has been used as referencing pillar only.Development proposal has been decided based on the Design Chainage system. Thedifference observed between the existing km stones and design Chainage has beenanalysed and presented in Table 5.2.

Table 5.2: Existing km Stone Vs Design Chainage

Sl. No. Existing Km. Stone Design Chainage1. 0 0.0002. 1 0.9303. 2 1.9304. 3 2.9805. 4 3.9206. 5 4.9207. 6 5.9608. 7 6.9309. 8 7.15010. 9 8.93011. 10 9.97012. 11 10.96013. 12 11.94014. 13 12.94015. 14 13.95016. 15 14.96017. 16 16.03018. 17 17.02019. 18 18.05020. 19 18.97021. 20 19.98022. 21 20.97023. 22 21.98024. 23 22.98025. 24 23.99026. 25 24.98027. 26 25.98028. 27 26.98029. 28 27.99030. 29 28.99031. 30 29.98032. 31 30.98033. 32 31.99034. 33 33.01035. 34 33.99036. 35 34.97037. 36 35.98038. 37 36.99039. 38 38.010



Sl. No. Existing Km. Stone Design Chainage40. 39 38.98041. 40 39.99042. 41 40.97043. 42 41.97044. State Border 42.655

The development scheme can be summarised as given in Table 5.3.

Table 5.3: Summary of Development Scheme

Sl. No. Description Length (km)

1 Only repair & maintenance 3.000

2 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) 30.705

3 2 Lane reconstruction in BT stretches (Existing 7m) 2.500

4 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) (Rural section)(Newly constructed) 4.500

5 2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m) (Built-up section)(Newly constructed) 1.000

6 2 Lane Cement Concrete (CC) only (Existing 7.0m )(Built-up section) 0.950

TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT 42.655Note: Minimum 10% CBR for subgrade soil is to be ensured for New, reconstruction stretches.

All the above schemes are general policy decisions; these will be dependent on theprecise geometric configuration, realignment, re-sectioning, reconstruction, exact landwidths available etc.

5.2.3 Alignment Design

The entire geometric design has been based on the ground modelling by highway MXdesign software. The design of proposed alignment for 2-lane with gravel shoulder hasbeen carried out based on the widening scheme as discussed above.

Horizontal Alignment

Efforts have been made during design of horizontal alignment to accommodate theProposed Highway within the available ROW, without compromising with the designstandards as adopted and as discussed in Chapter 2: Design Standards. A minimumradius of 360m has been kept along with a good balance between additional landacquisition, structure and highway geometric. The super-elevation and the length of thetransition curve have been finalised with maximum super-elevation of 7%.

Vertical Alignment

Vertical Alignment is designed for minimum criteria of Intermediate Sight Distance(ISD). The existing road profile is reviewed on the basis of cross-sections taken atregular intervals with the help of Digital Terrain Model (DTM).

Additional culverts have been proposed depending upon the site specificconditions/profile.

5.3 PROPOSAL FOR BYPASSES AND REALIGNMENTS



Based on the detailed reconnaissance no bypasses and no realignments have beenproposed for this 42.655 km long section extending between Hanumangarh to Abohar.

5.4 PAVEMENT OPTIONS

For the purpose of pavement design the project road is divided into two homogeneoussections as detailed in the traffic chapter.

The purpose of the pavement study is to make analysis of different pavementalternatives to provide a basis for selection of the most advantage solution, consideringall costs occurring during the life of the pavement, viz., construction costs, maintenancecosts and costs for the road users.

In pavement option study, the following is studied in detail:

· New flexible pavement on the widening part and for full reconstruction stretches

· Flexible overlay over the existing pavement

· Flexible Pavement for partial reconstruction stretches of existing pavement.

The different pavement design methods for above pavement options are studied andapplied, which are given in Table 5.4.

Table 5.4: Pavement Design Methods

Pavement Option Option Type Design Method1 New Flexible Pavement IRC: 37-20122 Flexible Overlay IRC: 81-1997

5.4.1 IRC: 37-2012 Method of Flexible Pavement Design for new construction

Design Life

In view of the Clause 5.4.1, flexible pavement is proposed for the design period of 15years subjected to the condition that design traffic shall not be less than 20msa.

Stage construction is not permitted.

CBR Value

The average CBR value of existing subgrade soil for the entire stretch is considered as10% (refer Table 3.14 of Chapter 3: Engineering Survey and Investigations).

Flexible Pavement Thickness for New pavement and Reconstruction Stretches

Table 5.5: Pavement Design (IRC 37)

Existing Chainage DesignTraffic(MSA)

CBR ofSubgrade

(%)




0.000 43.000 20 10 VG 30 40 80 250 200 570

Existing ground to be checked for suitability and loosened & re-compacted to desiredMDD and CBR.

5.4.2 IRC: 81-1997 Method of Overlay Design for overlay of existing pavements

The average characteristic deflection (Dc) values to be used for design purposes havebeen worked from BBD survey. The thicknesses are deduced from Figure 9 of IRC 81-



1997 in terms of bituminous macadam construction.

TestSection

Chainage, Km CharacteristicDeflection(mm), Dc

MSABM

Required,mm

BC/DBMRequired,

mm

ProposedOverlay, mm

From To BC DBM

1 04.000 04.250 1.71

20

133 93 40 55

2 08.000 08.250 2.06 170 119 40 80

3 10.000 10.250 2.19 179 125 40 85

4 13.000 13.225 2.01 166 116 40 75

5 17.000 17.250 1.97 162 114 40 75

6 20.000 20.225 1.89 154 108 40 70

7 23.000 23.225 1.92 157 110 40 70

8 26.000 26.225 1.83 147 103 40 65

9 29.000 29.225 2.02 167 117 40 75

10 32.000 32.225 1.81 145 102 40 60

11 34.000 34.225 1.31 74 52 40 10

12 37.000 37.225 1.77 140 98 40 60

13 40.000 40.225 1.46 103 72 40 30

Based on the above table the overlay requirement is calculated section wise and same issummarized & presented in Table 5.6.

Table 5.6: Proposed Overlay Thicknesses on Existing Lane as per IRC:81-1997Description BC DBM


5.4.3 IRC: 58-2011 Method of Rigid Pavement Design – For Toll Plaza locations

Rigid pavement for new carriageway has been designed as per IRC: 58.

Design Period

Normally, cement concrete pavements have a life span of 30 years and should bedesigned for this period.

Design Traffic

Design traffic of 25 per cent of the total two- lane two-way commercial vehicles may beconsidered as a very conservative estimate for design against fatigue failure. In case offour-lane and multi-lane divided highways, 25 per cent of the total traffic in thedirection of predominant traffic may be taken for design of pavement.

Temperature Differential



Temperature differential between the top and bottom of pavements causes the concreteslab to warp, giving rise to stresses. For this purpose, guidance may be had fromTable 5.7.

Table 5.7: Recommended Temperature Differentials for Concrete

Zone StatesTemperatures Differentials, 0C in

Slabs of Thickness15cm 20cm 25cm 30cm

IPunjab, U.P., Uttaranchal, Gujarat, Rajasthan,Haryana and North M.P., excluding hillyregions.

12.5 13.1 14.3 15.8

Considering all the stipulation of IRC 58-2011 the proposed rigid pavement thickness atToll Plaza locations is presented in Table 5.8.

Table 5.8: Proposed Rigid Pavement thickness at all Toll Plaza Locations

Material Type Thickness (mm)Pavement Quality Concrete (M-40) 300Dry Lean Concrete (M-15) 150Granular Sub-base 150Subgrade 500

5.5 DESIGN

5.5.1 Details of Junctions Improvement Proposal

All major/minor junctions on the project highway need to be upgraded and merged withthe upgraded project road. Drawings of the junction improvement are given along withplan and profile.

5.5.2 Design of Bridges and Cross-Drainage Structures

Seven minor bridges exist on the project road and the same has been proposed to beretained with widening in three of the seven bridges. The development proposal for allthe existing bridges is tabulated in Table 5.9.

Table 5.9: Summary of Development of Existing Minor Bridge

Location(Chainage)

SpanArrangement

Width of carriagewaybetween kerbs (m)

ProposedUpgradation


16.500 2 X 4.0 12.0 Rehabilitation22.300 2 X 3.2 12.0 Rehabilitation40.260 2 X 3.9 7.0 Widening


Note: Five minor bridges are proposed for widening as the width of carriageway is<7.5m (minimum required as per clause 7.3.2 of manual).

a) Culverts



There are total 56 existing culverts in the proposed road corridor, out of which 32 areproposed for widening /Reconstruction. A summary of the development proposal isgiven in Table 5.10.

Table 5.10: Summary of Development of Culverts

S. NoExisting

Chainage(In Km.)

DesignChainage(In Km.)

Existing DevelopmentProposed

TypeNo. ofSpans/Rows

Span (m)/pipe dia.(m)

Total width(m)

(to be widened,reconstructed)

1. 3.405 3.330 Slab 1 3.000 10.700 Reconstruction2. 3.772 3.690 Slab 1 0.800 10.700 Reconstruction3. 6.224 6.190 Slab 2 2.000 9.000 Reconstruction4. 7.045 7.380 Slab 1 0.800 9.600 Widening5. 7.920 7.880 Slab 1 0.700 9.600 Widening6. 12.862 12.805 Pipe 1 0.600 10.000 Reconstruction7. 13.389 13.330 Pipe 1 0.600 7.800 Reconstruction8. 13.651 13.600 Pipe 1 0.600 9.000 Reconstruction9. 13.910 13.855 Pipe 1 0.600 12.000 Reconstruction10. 14.959 14.905 Slab 1 1.000 10.000 Reconstruction11. 15.205 15.170 Slab 1 0.500 10.000 Reconstruction12. 16.601 16.580 Slab 1 1.000 9.500 Widening13. 21.291 21.270 Pipe 1 0.300 9.000 Reconstruction14. 22.054 22.030 Slab 1 1.000 9.000 Reconstruction15. 22.533 22.530 Pipe 1 1.000 9.000 Reconstruction16. 24.696 24.690 Slab 1 2.000 9.000 Widening17. 24.883 24.880 Slab 1 2.500 8.000 Widening18. 25.394 25.385 Pipe 1 0.800 12.000 Reconstruction19. 25.553 25.540 Slab 1 0.800 10.000 Reconstruction20. 28.114 28.090 Slab 1 1.000 9.500 Widening21. 29.642 29.630 Slab 1 1.000 10.000 Widening22. 29.861 29.850 Slab 1 1.000 10.000 Widening23. 30.660 30.650 Slab 1 1.000 9.000 Reconstruction24. 31.937 31.940 Slab 1 0.800 10.000 Widening25. 32.733 32.730 Slab 1 0.800 10.000 Widening26. 34.347 34.330 Slab 1 1.000 10.000 Reconstruction27. 35.932 35.920 Slab 1 1.000 10.000 Widening28. 36.098 36.080 Slab 1 3.500 9.000 Reconstruction29. 37.458 37.450 Pipe 1 0.600 10.000 Reconstruction30. 38.100 38.090 Pipe 1 0.600 7.000 Reconstruction31. 40.040 40.020 Slab 1 0.900 9.000 Reconstruction32. 42.803 42.410 Slab 1 0.500 10.000 Widening

Note: 1. Besides the above, the provision of Hume pipe / slab culverts at junctions of crossroads shall be provided/ augmented as per site requirement in consultation withIndependent Engineer and it shall not be treated as Change of Scope.



2.Culverts which are retained to be treated with minor/major repairs such as vegetationclearance, plastering of reinforcement exposed surfaces, silt removal & bed clearance andreplacement of parapet which are damaged etc. in accordance with para 7.23 of manual.

5.5.3 Longitudinal Drains

RCC covered drain in built-up section shall be provided. Exact location of the drain shallbe determined by the Concessionaire in consultation with the Independent Engineer. Anindicative list of locations and length of the drain is given below:

S. No.Design Chainage (in Km.) Design Length of Drain on

each Side (m)From To1 7.000 7.500 5002 17.200 17.500 3003 19.500 20.500 10004 38.000 38.150 150

Length 1950 m

5.5.4 Improvement Proposal of Railway Level Crossings

The project road crosses railway tracks at one location as level crossing. The summaryof existing level crossing is given below:


Sl.No. Location TrackDetails TVU Data

Remarks

1 2.965 BG (Single) 1,39,08930 March 2014 No ROB Proposed.

In view of the site constrain in proposing ROB, a joint site visit was conducted. It wasconcluded by PWD officials, not to propose ROB at this location.

5.6 ROAD FURNITURE AND OTHER FEATURES

5.6.1 Introduction

The road furniture, traffic safety features and other facilities included in the design are:

· Bus Shelters

· Road Markings

· Traffic Signs

· Kilometre Stone Details

· 200m Stones and Boundary Stones

5.6.2 Bus Shelters

Bus Shelters are tentatively proposed as per the recommendations of IRC: 80-1981 andon both sides of all built-up locations. However, the exact locations to be decided onground in consultation with Independent Engineers/ Client.

Table 5.12: List of proposed Bus Shelter Locations



Sl. No. Design Chainage(Km) Side (LHS/RHS) Settlement

1 3.800 LHS Hanumangarh2 4.400 RHS Rodawali3 14.600 LHS Dholipal4 25.800 RHS Hathiyawala5 28.200 LHS Khairuwala6 35.100 LHS Kararwala7 39.270 RHS Gadder Khera (RJ/PB Border)

Note: 1) Between the bus shelter and the carriageway, an additional paved area of 2.5 m widthand 20 m length should be provided in order to enable a bus to stop without obstructingthe flow of traffic.2) Appropriate provision shall be provided at Bus shelters so as to have ease of access todisabled people.

5.6.3 Overhead Traffic Signs

5 nos. of overhead traffic signs shall be provided on the Project Highway. Location shallbe finalised in consultation with IE.

Table 5.13: List of Overhead Traffic Signs

Sl. No. Location Nos. Size

1 Near Hanumangarh at km 4(Near Bypass)

1 Full width Gantry Mounted

2 Bypass of Hanumangarh(Towards Abohar)

1 Full width Gantry Mounted

3 Junction at SH-7B 2 Cantilever Gantry4 End of Project Road 1 Full width Gantry Mounted

5.6.4 Road Markings

Since the project road lane configuration is proposed to be double lane with no divider,hence from traffic safety point of view the road markings are must as the markingsserve as psychological barriers, essential to ensure smooth and orderly flow of trafficand to promote road safety.

The location and type of marking lines, material and colour is followed using IRC:35“Code of Practice for Road Markings”.

5.6.5 Cautionary, Mandatory and Informatory Signs

Cautionary, mandatory and informatory signs have been provided depending on thesituation and function they perform in accordance with the IRC: 67-2012 guidelines forRoad Signs.

5.6.6 Kilometer Stone Details

The details of kilometre stones are in accordance with IRC: 8-1980 guidelines. Kilometrestones are located on the left-hand side of the road as one proceeds from the stationfrom which the Kilometre count starts. Kilometre stones shall be fixed at right angles tothe centre line of the carriageway.



5.6.7 200m Stones

The details of 200m stones conform to IRC: 26 and IRC:25. 200m stones are located onthe same side of the road as the kilometre stones.

5.7 DESIGN OF TOLL PLAZA

Location of toll plazas has been proposed at km 28+300, based on the traffic dispersalpattern, road geometry and vertical profile of the road and the surrounding area.

The location of the toll plazas is based on the following:

· Only one toll plaza on the project highway (SH-7A) hence no impact /considerationof distance between the next toll plazas.

· Nearest major settlements and municipal limits is Hanumangarh that is 25km away.

· Maximum tollable traffic shall be captured hence good financial viability

· Away from bridges and culverts

· Away from junctions

· Away from sharp curves

5.7.1 Toll lanes

Normal Toll lane of 3.2m width along with one extra lane of 4.1m width is consideredfor tolled as well as non- Tollable/exempt vehicles and oversized (extra wide) vehicles,which cannot pass through regular toll lanes. Hence a minimum of 1+1 Toll lanes, withprovision of adding toll lanes as per future requirement is recommended for the projectroad.

Public Works Department Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report ofGovernment of Rajasthan Hanumangarh to Abohar (H3) (P1)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER-6: COST ESTIMATE ................................................................................................... 6-2

6.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................ 6-2

6.2 ESTIMATION OF QUANTITIES ........................................................................................ 6-2

6.3 PROJECT COST .................................................................................................................... 6-2



CHAPTER-6: COST ESTIMATE

6.1 GENERAL

The project cost estimates have been prepared based on various items of works requiredfor upgrading & improving the existing carriageway by:

· Reconstruction of existing poor stretches.

· Overlaying of existing fair and good stretches.

· Providing Granular shoulders on both sides.

6.2 ESTIMATION OF QUANTITIES

The quantities of major items of works have been worked out based on following:

· Site Clearance: The area considered for Site Clearance is the area within theproposed Right of Way.

· Earth Works: This item provides for roadway excavation, earthwork inembankment, sub-grade and shoulders, medians, islands including disposal ofsurplus earth and unsuitable material. In this stage, the construction ofembankment height has been taken as per site condition. Sub-grade soil having aCBR ≥ 8 % will be taken from borrows area. It is also to be ensured that duringconstruction the existing 500mm thick embankment/ existing ground below thesubgrade is re-compacted to MDD and have CBR value ≥ 8%.

· The pavement quantities like GSB, WMM & Bituminous items etc. have beenworked out based on Typical Cross Sections, pavement design done based ontraffic and with CBR 10%.

· Culverts: The estimation of quantities for culverts is based on site conditions.

· Bridges and Structures: The estimates of quantities for bridges and other structureshave been worked out as per site requirement in order to maintain natural drainagesystem of project area.

· Drainage, Protection Works, Traffic Signs and Markings: Proposed as per siterequirement and as per stipulated norms.

· Bus Shelters have been provided near all built-up / inhabited areas.

· Toll Plaza, Project road is having open tolling system.

6.3 PROJECT COST

After various site visits, site investigations and detailed discussions with Client andlatest in July 2015 the following considerations have been concluded for Cost-estimatingthe improvements of the Project Road Highway-3, Package-1, Hanumangarh to Abohar,42.655 km long stretch. Rate has been adopted from the Basic Schedule of Rates forNational Highway Works 2016 published by PWD- GoR



Considerations for cost-estimating Project Road Highway-3, Package-1, Hanumangarhto Abohar, 42.655 kms

Classification Length Proposed Development

2 Lane Overlay with BT (existing7m, proposed 7m + Gravel

shoulder) =30.705

Overlay of 2-Lane with 2.5 m wide150mm thick Granular Shoulder onboth sides, drainage layer extended

and Overlay

2 Lane Overlay with CC (existingCC pavement 7m, proposed CCpavement 7m + Concrete Block

shoulder)

950

Overlay of 2-Lane with 2.50m wideshoulder with 450mm thick Concrete

blocks (M-30 Grade) on both sides andoverlay on existing pavement with

150mm thick CC (M-30 Grade)

2 Lane reconstruction in BTstretches only (existing 7m,

proposed 7m+ Gravel shoulder)2500

Reconstruction & Raising of 2-Lanewith 2.50m wide 150mm thick

Granular Shoulder on both sides anddrainage layer extended

2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m,proposed 7m+ Gravel shoulder)

(Rural section) (Newlyconstructed section)

4500

Overlay of 2-Lane with 2.50m wide150mm thick Granular Shoulder onboth sides, drainage layer extended

and Overlay with 40mm BC only2 Lane Overlay (Existing 7.0m,

proposed 7m + Gravel shoulder)(Built-up section) (Newly

constructed section)

1000

Overlay of 2-Lane with 2.50m wide150mm thick Granular Shoulder on

both sides and Overlay with 40mm BConly

NO upgradation proposals 3000 Existing Km 0+000 to Km 3+000, Noupgradation works proposed

Total Length 42.655 km

Note: Minimum 10% CBR for subgrade soil is to be ensured for New and reconstructionstretches.

1) The pavement quantities like GSB, WMM & Bituminous items etc. have been workedout based on Typical Cross Sections, pavement design done based on traffic andwith subgrade as CBR 10%.

2) Proposed Base and Sub-Base Courses for reconstruction and new stretches

Design Chainage DesignTraffic(MSA)

CBR ofSubgrade

(%)




0.000 42.655 20 10 VG 30 40 80 250 200 570

3) Proposed Overlay Thicknesses on Existing Lane as per IRC:81-1997



Description BC DBM


4) Reconstruction in BT stretches considered from existing GSB layer top in poor

carriageway stretches and considered from subgrade wherever vertical profile is to

be improved.

5) Out of 56 nos. existing culverts, 32 nos. required to be widened /Reconstruction.

6) Out of 7 Minor bridges, 3 no. widening required, for remaining 4 no. minor bridge,

Minor rehabilitation is considered.

7) 1 Nos. of Toll Plaza (1+1) Lane is proposed.

8) Provisioning of Bus shelters 7 nos. considered.

9) All junctions’ development considered.

10) Only 1.95 km covered drain is considered in built-up section on both sides.

11) Highway Lighting considered in Built up section only.

12) Rate Analysis is carried out based on: Basic Schedule of Rates for National

Highway Works 2016 published by PWD- GoR.



The Cost Summary for the project up-gradation is presented hereunder:

S.No. Bill No. Description AmountPercentage

(%)


2


2,60,98,176

5.8%

3 Bill No 3 GRANULAR SUB-BASE AND BASECOURSES 3,49,70,320 7.8%


5 Bill No 5 CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS(CULVERTS) 83,00,700 1.9%

6Bill No 6

STRUCTURAL WORKS (BRIDGES ,UNDERPASSES, FLY OVERS &INTERCHANGE) 1,21,55,040

2.7%

7Bill No 7

TRAFFIC SIGNAGES, ROADMARKINGS & OTHERAPPURTENANCES 4,40,81,691

9.8%

8Bill No 8 DRAINAGE, PROTECTION WORKS &

RETAINING WALLS 3,21,75,0007.2%

9 Bill No 9 HIGHWAY LIGHTING 86,52,000 1.9%10 Bill No 10 TOLL PLAZA 2,25,00,000 5.0%

11 Bill No 11 JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT, BUSSHELTERS 2,62,66,934 5.9%



# hence, the Civil Cost for the project up-gradation is 44.77 Crores.

6.4 COST OF NON-CIVIL WORKS

Cost of non-civil items is calculated based on the new Land Acquisition Act2013. Resettlement and Environmental Mitigation cost is calculated based onconsultant survey detailed in EIA & SIA reports.

Ø Cost of Utility shifting = Rs 0.76 Cr.

Ø Total Resettlement Budget = Rs 0.28 Cr.

Ø Environmental Mitigation Cost = Rs 0.88 Cr.

Ø Land Acquisition Cost = Rs 0.0 Cr.

Total cost of Non-Civil works = Rs 1.92 Crores

Pertinent to mention cost of non-civil items shall be borne by the Governmentof Rajasthan.



Utility Shifting Involves

S. No. Description of Material Unit Qty.

1 Dismantling of HT line Span 0

2 Dismantling of Joist & PSC pole No. 68

3 Dismantling of Transformer No. 13



TABLE OF CONTENT

CHAPTER- 7: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 7-2

7.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 7-2

7.2 HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS ............................................................................................ 7-2

7.3 TRAFFIC COUNT ................................................................................................................ 7-2

7.4 COST OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................... 7-3

7.4.1 Phasing of the Capital Cost ..................................................................................... 7-3

7.4.2 Cost Escalation ......................................................................................................... 7-4

7.6 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PERIOD EXPENSES ............................................ 7-4

7.7 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS................................................................................................. 7-5

LIST OF TABLES

Table 7.1: Details of Toll Homogeneous Sections ............................................................................. 2

Table 7.2: Categorization of Vehicles as per the Types mentioned in Toll Policy .......................... 2

Table 7.3: Traffic Projection (PCUs) ................................................................................................... 3

Table 7.4: Toll Rates applicable for the Project road (L=42.655km) ................................................. 4

Table 7.5: Toll Revenue for the Project road (L=42.655km) .............................................................. 4

Table 7.6: Category I: PPP (VGF) - Financial Indicators ................................................................... 5



CHAPTER- 7: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1 BACKGROUND

The main objective of financial analysis is to assess the likely returns to the investorsunder realistic conditions/assumptions. In the present studies the financial viability ofthe project is assessed, assuming minimum Equity IRR to be >=15%, on the basis ofproject’s financial internal rate of return on investments, which is estimated on the basisof cash flow analysis.

The analysis attempts to ascertain the extent to which the investment can be recoveredthrough toll revenue and the gap, if any, be provided through grant. This covers aspectslike financing through debt and equity, loan repayment, debt servicing, taxation,depreciation, etc. The viability of the project is evaluated on the basis of Equity IRR. TheEquity IRR is estimated on the basis of cash flow analysis, where both costs andrevenues have been indexed to take account of inflation.

7.2 HOMOGENEOUS SECTIONS

The Project Road has been kept as one tolling homogeneous section.

Table 7.1: Details of Toll Homogeneous Sections

TollingSection #

LocationTollingLength

Reason for Selection

1 Km 28.300 42.655 kmBetween Hanumangarh km 0+000 and

Abohar Border km 42+655

7.3 TRAFFIC COUNT

The Classified Traffic Volume Count is carried out at km 28.00. Table below presents theaverage of traffic count at the proposed toll plaza location

Table 7.2: Categorization of Vehicles as per the Types mentioned in Toll Policy

Location km 28Car, Jeep, Van or Light Motor Vehicle 1312

Tractor with trolley carrying non-agricultural produce

0

Light Commercial Vehicle, Mini Bus 100Bus 138

2-Axle Truck 563-Axle Truck 139

HCM or EME or Multi Axle Vehicle (MAV)(4 to 6 axles) 112

Oversized Vehicles (>7axle) 0

Tollable PCUs 2965

Non Tollable PCUs 1885

Total PCUs 4850



The traffic (AADT) at proposed toll plaza location is projected to analyses theconcession period based on the traffic capacity parameters. Maximum capacity for 2L(7.00m) is considered as 15,000 PCUs based on Standard Capacities for roads inRajasthan, approved by Cabinet Note of Govt. of Rajasthan.

Table 7.3: Traffic Projection (PCUs)

Sr. No. Vehicle Type km 28+000(Proposed TP) Remarks

1. Year 2014-15 4850 Base Year2. Year 2015-16 5093 Bidding & Financial

Close3. Year 2016-17 53474. Year 2017-18 5615 Construction Period5. Year 2018-19 5895 Year 26. Year 2019-20 6190 Year 37. Year 2020-21 6500 Year 48. Year 2021-22 6825 Year 59. Year 2022-23 7166 Year 610. Year 2023-24 7524 Year 711. Year 2024-25 7900 Year 812. Year 2025-26 8295 Year 913. Year 2026-27 8710 Year 1014. Year 2027-28 9146 Year 1115. Year 2028-29 9603 Year 1216. Year 2029-30 10083 Year 1317. Year 2030-31 10587 Year 1418. Year 2031-32 11117 Year 1519. Year 2032-33 11672 Year 1620. Year 2033-34 12256 Year 1721. Year 2034-35 12869 Year 1822. Year 2035-36 13512 Year 1923. Year 2036-37 14188 Year 2024. Year 2037-38 14897 Year 2125. Year 2038-39 15642 Exceed 2L LOS-B26. Year 2039-40 16424 Year 2427. Year 2040-41 17246 Year 25

Growth rate of 5% is considered for all types of vehicles

Hence maximum concession period of 21 years can be considered,

COST OF THE PROJECT

The costing for the project is done as per the details covered in this report.

Civil Construction Cost = Rs 44.77 Crores (Rs 1.05 Crores/Km)

TPC (Total Project Cost) = Rs 51.40 Crores (Calculated)



7.3.1 Phasing of the Capital Cost

The total cost for the proposed project road has been computed based on the 2014-15prices. The annual phasing of capital cost is made as per the work schedule.Construction cost is phased over a 1.5 years construction period from Oct 2016 to April2018 as 50% and 50% respectively.

7.3.2 Cost Escalation

The base costs have been escalated at a rate of 5% per annum to obtain the actual costsin the year of expenditure. This is in line with long-term inflation rates of majormaterials utilized for construction.

7.4 TOLL RATES

Toll rates have been taken as per the FEE RULES NOTIFICATION of Government ofRajasthan published in 2015.

Table 7.4: Toll Rates applicable for the Project road (L=42.655km)

Year Car Mini-Bus/LCV

Bus/Truck

3 AxleTruck

4-6 AxleTruck

>=7Axle

2015-16per km rate 1.05 1.60 3.15 5.25 5.25 6.30

ApplicableToll 2015-16 45 70 135 225 225 270

7.5 Toll Revenue

The toll revenue is the product of the forecast traffic expected to use the road and theappropriate toll fee for the vehicle category. A toll indexing pattern @ 5% per year hasbeen adopted and rounded off to nearest five Rupee.

Table 7.5: Toll Revenue for the Project road (L=42.655km)

SN Financial Year Toll Plaza 1

2014-15Feasibility Study

2015-16 2016-17 Bidding & Financial Close

1 2017-18 Construction Period (1.0 Years)2 2018-19 6.643 2019-20 7.594 2020-21 8.205 2021-22 9.186 2022-23 10.267 2023-24 11.098 2024-25 12.369 2025-26 13.73

10 2026-27 14.8611 2027-28 16.43



SN Financial Year Toll Plaza 1

12 2028-29 18.2813 2029-30 20.1814 2030-31 22.2715 2031-32 24.6516 2032-33 27.2417 2033-34 29.9318 2034-35 32.8419 2035-36 36.1320 2036-37 39.8821 2037-38 43.69

7.6 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PERIOD EXPENSES

Routine maintenance costs comprise of maintenance of the pavement, collection of litter,traffic management (policing), accident repairs and all ancillary works includingbeautification.

The periodic maintenance costs include cost of overlay, repair/renovation of roadfurniture, drains, buildings etc. The periodic maintenance includes periodic renewals atevery 6 years as per circular.

7.7 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

Based on the project structure traffic study and toll rate analysis, financial feasibilityanalysis has been carried out as per the methodology outlined in earlier sections. Theminimum Equity IRR (Return on Equity) considered for the project is 15%. Financialindicators are presented in Table 5.5 below.

Table 7.6: Category I: PPP (VGF) - Financial Indicators

Sr.No

CivilCost (Cr)

ConcessionPeriod VGF Project

IRREquity

IRRNPV at

12% rate

Ia44.77 Cr. 21 Years

0% 13.8% 14.6% 6.8

Ib 2% 14.0% 15.0% 7.7

4.1. CONCLUSION

For project is viable on PPP with 2% Viability Gap Funding (2% Equity Support).



TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER-8: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...................................................... 2

8.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 28.2 ROAD AND ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................... 28.3 SCOPE OF PRESENT REPORT ...................................................................................................... 28.4 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES AND LEGISLATION ....................................................................... 38.5 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 48.6 SCOPE OF DETAILED EIA STUDY ............................................................................................... 4

8.6.1 Geology and Soil ........................................................................................................... 58.6.2 Land Use Pattern .......................................................................................................... 58.6.3 Water Resources ............................................................................................................ 68.6.4 Climate ......................................................................................................................... 6

8.7 RELIGIOUS STRUCTURES / HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ......................................... 7

8.7.1 Religious Structures ...................................................................................................... 78.7.2 Historical/Archaeological Sites ...................................................................................... 78.7.3 Roadside Plantation ...................................................................................................... 78.7.4 Structures ..................................................................................................................... 8

8.8 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................ 8

8.8.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) .................................................................. 88.8.2 Noise Quality Monitoring ............................................................................................. 98.8.3 Water Quality Monitoring ............................................................................................ 98.8.4 SUMMARY OF BUDGET FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................................ 10


Fig. 8.1: Project Location Map ................................................................................................ 2

Table 8.1: Summary of Relevant Environmental Legislations ............................................. 3

Fig. 8.3: Land Use Pattern ....................................................................................................... 6

Fig. 8.4: Road Side Plantation ................................................................................................. 8

Table 8.5: AAQ Monitoring Result on Project Road ............................................................. 9

Table 8.6: National Ambient Noise Quality Standards ........................................................ 9

Table 8.7: Details of Water Quality Standards ...................................................................... 9

Table 8.7: Summary of Estimated Cost for Implimentaion of EMP and Monitoring ...... 10



CHAPTER-8: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

8.1 INTRODUCTION

The Project Road (SH-7A) starts from Hanumangarh on SH-7A at km 0+000 and ends atAbohar (Gadder Khera Village) at km 43+000 (Rajasthan/ Punjab Border). The projectroad passes through Hanumangarh and Ganganagar districts of Rajasthan. The majorsettlements along the project corridor are Hanumangarh, Satipura, Rorawali, Dholipal,Kheruwala, Hathiyanwala and Kararwala. The index map depicting the project road ispresented in Fig 8.1.

8.2 ROAD AND ENVIRONMENT

Road projects are meant for improving the quality of life for people and developing thecountry’s economy. For all positive impacts of the road projects, there may be also somesignificant detrimental impacts on communities in the project area and naturalenvironment. There may be impact on properties of people, their livelihood and othersocial components. Similarly there can be direct or indirect impact on flora, fauna, waterresources, land use etc. To account for all these issues, environmental and social impactassessments are utmost necessary. These concerns for environmental and social issuesin road projects have also become a part of legal requirements and requirements forobtaining financial support. Environmental considerations are, therefore, of primeimportance in road projects. Project Location Map in Fig. 8.1.

Fig. 8.1: Project Location Map

8.3 SCOPE OF PRESENT REPORT

Environmental assessment is a detailed process, which starts from the conception of theproject and continues till the operation phases. The steps for environmental assessment



are, therefore, different in different phases. The first step for environmental assessmentis known as screening and scoping. The present study is Environmental Screening studywhich is preliminary study of Environmental Impact Assessment and is beingconducted to identify the environmental implications of the project, preliminaryidentification of potential environmental impacts and for providing recommendationsfor integrating environmental measures into design. This study is a part of DetailedProject Report of the project in accordance with the Terms of Reference.

8.4 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES AND LEGISLATION

Table-8.1 presents Environmental regulations and legislations relevant to this project,along with their competent authority for implementation.

Table 8.1: Summary of Relevant Environmental Legislations

Act/Rule/Notification Year Objectives Responsible Agency

The Environment(Protection) Act

The Environment(Protection) Rules

1986

1986

To protect and improve theoverall environmentTo regulate industrial setups.NOC required for establishingand operating crusher/ hot mixplants and project requiringEnvironmental Clearance.

Ministry of Environmentand Forests (MoEF); GoI;Department of Forest,Govt. of Rajasthan(GoO); Central PollutionControl Board (CPCB);

Environment ImpactAssessmentNotification andamendments madethereafter.

2006

2009

To provide EnvironmentalClearance to new developmentactivities followingenvironmental impactassessment

MoEF; GoI; CPCB;

Indian Forest Act

Forest (Conservation)ActForest (Conservation)Rules

1927

19801981

To consolidate the laws related toforest, the transit of forestproduce and the duty leviable ontimber and other forest produce.Conservation of Forests,Judicious use of forestland fornon-forestry purposes; and toreplenish the loss of forest coverby Compensatory Afforestationon degraded forestland and non-forest land.

MoEF; Department ofForest, GoR

Wild Life (Protection)Act

The Wild Life(Protection)Amendment Act

1972

2002

To protect wildlife in general andNational Parks and Sanctuariesin particular.To protect wild animals, birdsand plants with a view to ensurethe ecological and environmentalsecurity of the country

Chief Conservator ofWildlife, Wildlife Wing,Forest Department, GoRNational/State Board forWildlife

National Forest PolicyNational Forest Policy(Revised)

19521988

To maintain ecological stabilitythrough preservation andrestoration of biological diversity

Forest Department, GoIand GoR

The Water(Prevention andControl of Pollution)Act

1974 To control water pollution bycontrolling discharge ofpollutants as per prescribedstandards.

CPCB; RSPCB

The Air (Preventionand Control of

1981 To control air pollution bycontrolling emission of air

CPCB; RSPCB &Transport Department;



Act/Rule/Notification Year Objectives Responsible Agency

Pollution) Act pollutants as per prescribedstandards

GoR

Noise Pollution(Regulation andControl) RulesThe Noise Pollution(Regulation andControl) AmendmentRules

2000

2006

To regulate and control noiseproducing and generatingsources with the objective ofmaintaining the ambient airquality standards in respect ofnoise.

CPCB; RSPCB &Transport Department;GoR.

The Motor VehicleAct

Central Motor VehicleRules

1988

1989

To consolidate and amend thelaws related to motor vehicles.Licensing of driving of motorvehicles, registration of motorvehicles, with emphasis on roadsafety standards and pollutioncontrol measures, standards fortransportation of hazardous andexplosive materials. To checkvehicular air and noise pollution

Motor VehicleDepartment

The AncientMonuments andArchaeological Sitesand Remain Act

1958 To provide for the preservationof ancient and historicalmonuments and archeologicalsites and remains of nationalimportance and protectionsculptures, carvings and otherlike objects.

ArchaeologicalDepartment, GoI; IndianHeritage Society andIndian National Trustfor Art and CultureHeritage (INTACH)

Project Road is a state Highway project, all state highways project fall in Category B.And since no National Park /Wild Life Sanctuary and Eco sensitive zone area fallswithin 10km of Project Road, the project remains in Category ‘B’.

8.5 METHODOLOGY

The screening process mainly consists of following types of activities:1 Study of Background information on project and related policy and legal issues2 Collection of data from secondary sources3 Reconnaissance survey of the project impact zone4 Analysis of data and Screening exercise5 Preliminary identification of Environmental impacts and mitigation

8.6 SCOPE OF DETAILED EIA STUDY

a) Study of Background Information

Study of Project Documents: First task is to study the project documents to have theunderstanding of the project objectives, its main components, its boundary etc. Unlessthe project is well understood, its different impacts on environment and social issuescannot be properly identified.

Study of Laws and regulations: Laws and regulations enacted by Government of India andState of Rajasthan relevant to road construction and environment were studied.



Study of Guidelines, Standards etc.: Ministry of Environment and Forests and ClimateChange (MoEF&CC) and Indian Road Congress (IRC) have published different usefuldocuments, which were studied for screening exercise.

b) Collection of Data from Secondary SourcesAfter having the background information about the project and its environmentalaspects from legal and policy points, the next step involves collection of data fromsecondary sources. The data was collected on landuse pattern, physiography, soil &geology, meteorology, forests, demography and related other environmental aspects.The relevant topo-sheets for the project were also collected from Survey of India.c) Reconnaissance Survey of the Project Impact ZoneA team of environment and social experts carried out reconnaissance survey of theproject road. As per reconnaissance survey a land width is available all along the projectroad. This can accommodate the expansion of road to 2 Lane with 2.5m GranularShoulder configurations.Sensitive environmental components along the corridor of impact were recorded. Theseare, road side trees, public utilities, community resources, etc. Informal publicconsultations with local people along the road side were also conducted to record theiropinion about the project.d) Analysis of Data and Screening ExerciseThe data collected through the above steps were compiled to develop the environmentalscenario of the project area and the sensitive components within that. The full roadlength was put under screening to identify the sensitive zones. For convenience, theroads are divided into 1 km sections and sensitive environmental issues under eachsection are identified. The identification of environmental sensitive features in projectarea would help in further detailed study and preparation of Environmental ImpactAssessment report and Environmental Management Plan for the project at later phase.e) Preliminary Identification of Environmental Impacts and MitigationRoad construction related impacts occur at three stages of the project viz. Planning andDesign, Construction and Operation stage. The broad impacts on physical, ecologicaland social environment were identified based on the screening data and suggestivemitigation measures shall be provided.

8.6.1 Geology and Soil

Both the districts have plain Topography covered with a thick layer of alluvium andwindblown sand. It displays a general slope towards west with the gradient about 4-5meters per kilometer.

8.6.2 Land Use Pattern

The roadside environment is variable from rural village developments to ruralagricultural areas, semi-rural open areas with occasional roadside dwellings and smallbusiness scattered throughout the route. There is ribbon development at some locationsalong the road with small settlements. Major part of project road passes through ruralopen area. Fig. 8.3.

For the purpose of this roadside assessment, the land use types are identified as follows:

Built up Hanumangarh, Rodawali, Dholipal, Hathiyawala, Khairuwala, Karawala,Gadderkhera are some Built up in the Section.

Rural A rural environment with isolated individual houses, schools, businessesalongside to the roadway.



Agriculture Mainly cultivated land, with or without isolated thatched farmsteads.Forest No Reserve / Protected Forest in this Section.

Fig. 8.3: Land Use Pattern

8.6.3 Water Resources

Drainage: Road side drainage is not noticed in the rural section of the road. Except atfew settlements and ephemeral Channels near Hanumangarh and Dholipal and fewNatural lakes or depressions are observed near Rodawali, Khairuwala, and Karawala.In the year of drought there is no run off.

Surface Water: There are Some Minor and Major Canals crossing the project corridor.Surface water quality monitoring results of the project area is in permissible limit.

Ground Water: Ground water is an important source of drinking water. Ground waterquality monitoring results of the project area is in permissible limit.

8.6.4 Climate

Marked variations in diurnal and seasonal range of temperature occur at all places inthe state, exhibiting the most characteristic phenomenon of the warm-dry continentalclimate.

The region experience maximum rainfall during July-August. 2009-2013 data revealsthat mean maximum rainfall of 142.9mm in August 2011 in Hanumangarh District and149.3 mm in 2011 September in Ganganagr District. While December – January is thedry period. May-June is the hottest period when the mean maximum and minimumtemperature recorded is 41.8°C and 29.3°C respectively. January is the coldest monthwhen mercury dip to as low as 6.5°C.



Flora and Fauna

Flora and Road side PlantationThe flora of study area is rich owing to climatic condition. Diversification of floraspecies is evident. There are varieties of plant species present in the study corridor.Common varieties of trees found in roadside areas are Khejri, Israli Babool Sal, Teak,Kiker, Bel, Siris. Few trees are required to be cut due to this expansion. Exact number oftrees to be shall be assessed after finalization of the alignment.

FaunaDifferent species of fauna are present in the study area. The major fauna present areFrogs, and toads. Livestock reared in these districts are Cows. Common birds likePigeon, Bulbul and sparrow, Hiran etc. were seen along the project road.

No endangered flora and fauna species are located along the proposed project corridor.

National Park/ Wildlife SanctuaryThere is no National Park falling within 10 km distance from the project road.

Environmental Impact

During widening of 2 lane road some Environmental feature will be affected in below

Sl. No. Environmental Impact Affected Nos.1 No. of trees to be felled (Nos.) Nil2 Hand pumps (No.) -3 Bore wells (No.) 014 Water Tank (No.) -5 Impact on Religious structures (No.) -6 Impact on Community structures (No.) 1 (Well)7 Impact on Bus Stand (No.) 04

Mitigation Measure

The proposed project cause potential adverse Environmental impacts which are lessadverse in Nature and few of them are reversible and mitigation measures can bedesignated more readily for the identified impacts.

8.7 RELIGIOUS STRUCTURES / HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES

8.7.1 Religious Structures

The impact on religious structures is generally considered as an area of concern due toits association with the religious sentiments of the people. The total number of religiousproperties likely to be affected due to project is Six.

8.7.2 Historical/Archaeological Sites

There is no historical or archaeological site listed under Archeological Survey of Indiaalong the project road.

8.7.3 Roadside Plantation

Tree cutting is a critical environmental issue but the cutting of roadside trees isinevitable during the widening process. A homogenous number of trees are presentthroughout the length of the project road at both the sides. The widening will have to bedone judiciously so that maximum trees are saved. Road side Plantation in Fig. 8.4.



Fig. 8.4: Road Side Plantation

8.7.4 Structures

Since there is no realignment or geometric improvement of alignment, the structures areleast affected.

8.8 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

The purpose of the monitoring programme is to ensure that the envisaged purpose ofthe project is achieved and results in desired benefits to the target population. To ensurethe effective implementation of the EMP, it is essential that an effective monitoringprogram be designed and carried out. The environmental monitoring programmeprovides such information based on which management decision may be taken duringconstruction and operational phases. It provides basis for evaluating the efficiency ofmitigation and enhancement measures and suggest further actions that need to be takento achieve the desired effect.

8.8.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM)

The results of analysis of air samples are presentedin the following tables. In general, for bothmonitoring stations the PM10 values weremonitored in the range 73 - 78 μg/m3. The airquality parameters have been monitored inaccordance with the National Ambient Air QualityStandards. PM2.5 values were ranging from 39-45.Similarly monitored values for SO, NO and CO isalso found within the limit.



Table 8.5: AAQ Monitoring Result on Project Road

S.No. Locations

PM 10 PM 2.5 SO2 NOx COµg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3

1 Hanumangarh 73.65 39.50 13.80 26.50 0.622 Sadulsahar 78.50 44.50 14.50 29.80 0.51

8.8.2 Noise Quality Monitoring

As with air quality, the noise levels have beenmonitored at designated locations in accordancewith the Ambient Noise Quality standards givenin Table 6.4 below. The monitored noise levelswere ranging from 52.5 dB(A) (Hanumangarh) to58.1 dB(A) (Sadulsahar) at Day Time and the noiselevels were ranging from 44.80 dB(A)(Hanumangarh) to 51.35 dB(A) (Sadulsahar) atNight Time.

Table 8.6: National Ambient Noise QualityStandards

S. No. Locations Leq - Day in dB (A) Leq - Night dB (A)1 Hanumangarh 52.50 44.802 Sadulsahar 58.10 51.35

8.8.3 Water Quality Monitoring

Water quality parameters such as pH, totaldissolved solids, lead, Cadmium, Zinc etc. havebeen monitored at both the locations as perstandards prescribed by Central Pollution ControlBoard and Indian Standard Drinking waterspecifications IS 10500 -1991. The details ofGround Water Quality and Surface Water Qualityare presented in Table 8.7.

Table 8.7: Details of Water Quality Standards

S.No.

Parameters andUnit

Groundwater Quality Surface waterHanumangarh Sadulsahar Hanumangarh Sadulsahar

1 pH 8.15 7.88 8.69 8.422 Colour <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.03 Turbidity <1.0 2 4.00 4.004 Odour Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable5 Taste Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable6 Chloride 142.56 105.20 260.10 190.10

7 Total Hardness asCaCO3 295.63 275.89 318.50 286.6

8 Calcium as Ca 93.58 88.56 95.20 72.509 Sulphate 48.96 52.78 88.10 59.58



S.No.

Parameters andUnit

Groundwater Quality Surface waterHanumangarh Sadulsahar Hanumangarh Sadulsahar

10 Total DissolvedSolid 486.35 380.50 708.00 620.00

11 Alkalinity 218.50 218.50 340.20 390.2012 Iron 0.21 0.28 0.56 0.5613 Fluoride 0.87 1.85 0.82 0.8914 Megnesium 15.10 13.35 19.68 21.3615 Boron 0.49 0.88 0.69 0.8316 Chromium <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.0117 Copper <0.02 <0.02 0.66 0.9818 Manganese <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.0219 Nitrate 8.23 7.85 8.46 21.5020 Cadmium <0.003 <0.003 <0.003 <0.00321 Lead <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.0122 Arsenic <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.0123 Mercury <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.00124 Selenium <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.0125 Aluminium <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.0226 Zinc 0.31 0.22 2.15 1.20

27 Residual freeChalorine <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

28 Anionic Detergent <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.0229 Cyanide <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

30 PhenolicCompound <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

31 Total Coliform Absent Absent Absent Absent32 E.coli Absent Absent Absent Absent

8.8.4 SUMMARY OF BUDGET FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT PLAN

Summary of Budget in Table No:-8.7

Table 8.7: Summary of Estimated Cost for Implementation of EMP and Monitoring

Sl.No. Various Activities Cost (Rs.)

1.0 Implementation of EMP 85,36,155

2.0 Environmental Monitoring 3,25,000

Total 88,61,155

Say Rs. 88.6 Lakh

Public Works Department Consultancy Services for Preparation of Feasibility Report ofGovernment of Rajasthan Hanumangarh – Abohar (H3)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER-9: SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................................................................... 9-2

9.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................. 9-2

9.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................. 9-2

9.3 SIA PROCESS / METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... 9-3

9.4 THE PHYSICAL FEATURES AND THE DISTRICT PROFILE ......................................... 9-3

9.4.1 District Profile : Hanumangarh ............................................................................... 9-3

9.4.2 District Profile : Sri Ganganagar .............................................................................. 9-4

9.5 THE SOCIO BACKGROUND AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE .................................... 9-5

9.6 POTENTIAL SOCIAL IMPACT EVALUATION WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OFIMPACT ................................................................................................................................. 9-5

9.6.1 Properties Likely to be affected ............................................................................... 9-5

9.6.2 Preliminary Land Acquisition ................................................................................. 9-6

9.7 DETAILED ENTITLEMENT MATRIX ................................................................................ 9-6

9.7.1 Applicable Legislation and Policies ...................................................................... 9-10

9.8 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION AND PEOPLES PERCEPTION .......................... 9-10

9.9 ESTIMATED R&R BUDGET .............................................................................................. 9-12

LIST OF TABLES

Table 9.3: Impact on Structures in Project Road Sections ............................................................... 9-5

Table 9.2: Entitlement Matrix............................................................................................................ 9-6

Table 9.3: Relevant Regulations and Legislations ......................................................................... 9-10

Table 9.4: Village wise Scheduled Public Consultations and FGD .............................................. 9-11

Table 9.5: Estimated R & R Budget................................................................................................. 9-12



CHAPTER-9: SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

9.1 GENERAL

The social impact assessment study is meant to determine the magnitude of actual andpotential impact on the population, properties and land due to improvement ofproposed road with the objective to ensure the social considerations be given adequateweightage in the selection and design of proposed highway improvements. Basic idea isto minimize adverse social impacts with best possible engineering solutions at theoptimal cost.

The main objective of this chapter is to delineate the social impact issues, identify thepotential hotspots and determine the magnitude of actual and potential impacts onpeople, properties and land. It also ensures the adequate weightage of socialconsiderations in the selection and design of proposed highway improvements. Themain features and findings of this report are as follows:

9.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES

The Social Assessment process generally begins with screening at the time of projectidentification where steps are taken from the beginning and plans/ designs/alignments are finalized in such a way that to the extent possible adverse impacts areavoided at the designing stage itself and make these roads people friendly. These stepsare:

· Avoiding the adverse social impact at the designing stage especially while finalisingthe alignments

· Mitigating the adverse impacts at designing stage and construction/operation phase

· Compensating the affected people/common properties and rehabilitation andresettlement measures

The overall objective of conducting Social Assessment is to provide input of socialconcerns to be dovetailed in project design and to avoid or minimize the adverse socialimpacts with the best possible engineering solutions at the most optimal cost withcomplete co-ordination between the engineering, environmental and social teamsduring the entire design process.

In brief, keeping in mind the scope and objectives of the study, the following main taskshas been considered for accomplishment:

· To highlight the need for a proposed road project;

· To describe the proposed road project and alternatives;

· To evaluate the potential impacts of proposed road project options on the valuedecosystem components within the project study area;

· To consult the local people, officials and experts on options and impacts in order toestablish institutional capacity;

· To encourage the public participation during consultation;

· To select the preferred project option and suggest mitigation plan.



9.3 SIA PROCESS / METHODOLOGY

Social impact assessment need clear defination of the Corridor of Impact (CoI) and theRight of Way (ROW) for establishing the extent of social impact. To achieve the targetwhich needs comprehensive data involves the following methodology:

The social assessment of the project has been carried out as per requirement ofRFCTLARRA 2013. The details of methodologies are includes:(i) Sample Socio-Economic Survey: Based

on final alignments and detailedmeasurement survey of land andstructure, a sample socio-economicsurvey was carried out during the monthsof February 2015 and July 2015. Thesample socio-economic survey hasdelineated impacts as minor impacts andmajor impacts.

(ii) Stakeholder’s Consultation and Publichearing: Consultations were carried outat individual level. Important issuesdiscussed which include (but not limited to) impact of land acquisition on thelivelihood of the people, compensation as per RFCTLARRA 2013, findings,suggestions and opinion of people will be taken into account while preparing socialimpact assessment. (Details of the consultations have been presented in SIA).Furthermore, consultations with institutional stakeholders have provided an insightto develop social impact assessment for the project.

Thus, both primary and secondary data are required for establishing the extent ofimpact, which has been collected by administering the questionnaire for collectinginformation on structures, properties, land and type of ownership and social groups etc.with the help of enumerators/ investigators and by collecting secondary data fromdifferent govt. and non-govt. sources.The data collected and recorded by the enumerators on questionnaires has beencompiled on computers through MS-Excel (MS-Office Version 2003).The tabulated data has been summarized in tables and analyzed so that social situationprevailing in the area is visualized and potential social issues are estimated. Theanalysis will prove the feasibility of the project and will help in suggesting varioussocially viable alignment options for engineering design and also come out with themitigation measures to make the project socio-economically acceptable.

9.4 THE PHYSICAL FEATURES AND THE DISTRICT PROFILE

9.4.1 District Profile : Hanumangarh

Hanumangarh is the northern mostdistrict of Rajasthan. Total area is9656.09 sq km; the district is surroundedby Churu in south, Sri Ganganagar inwest, Punjab and Haryana in north andeast respectively. The geographicalcoordinates of the district are 29° 5' to30° 6' North latitude and 74° 3' to 75º 3'east Longitude. There are 7 tehsil in



district Hanumangarh these are Hanumangarh, Sangaria, Pilibanga, Nohar, Bhadra,Rawatsar and Tibbi.

The district is located in the extreme north of Rajasthan. Hanumangarh had populationof 1,774,692 of which male and female were 931,184 and 843,508 respectively. Districthas 1,779,650 populations (2011 census) and a population density of 184 persons/km². Itis bounded on the north by Punjab state, on the east by Haryana state, on the south byChuru District of Rajasthan, and on the west by Ganganagar District of Rajasthan. Themajor work of the district is farming; major crops include rice, millet, cotton,sonamukhi, wheat, and vegetables.

The district has a population density of 184 inhabitants per square kilometre (480/sqmi). Its population growth rate over the decade 2001–2011 was 16.91%. Hanumangarhhas a sex ratio of 906 females for every 1000 males and a literacy rate of 67.13%.

9.4.2 District Profile : Sri Ganganagar

Sri Ganganagar district is situated in thenorthern region of Rajasthan between28°40ʹ ʹ to 30°06 north latitude and72°39ʹ ʹ to 74°21 east longitude. Thedistrict shares its boundaries withChuru and Bikaner in the south,Hanumangarh in the south-east,Ferozpur district of Punjab in the north-east and Bahawalpur district of Pakistanin the north-west. The total area of SriGanganagar district is 10.93 lac hectaresout of which 77.5 % area is cultivated.The cultivated area has increasedsteadily due to fertile land, adequateirrigation facilities and prosperity of thefarmers.

Sri Ganganagar district is a plain regionof the vast Thar desert land. It hassandy soil in the west dotted with 4-5 metre high sand dunes. The northern part of thedistrict is mostly covered with forest. The average height of the district from the sealevel is 168 to 227 metres. There remains much climatic variation in Sriganganagardistrict throughout the year. It is an arid region with very low rainfall. The winterseason extends from November to March, the summer season from April to June, rainyseason from July to mid-September, and post-monsoon season from mid-September toOctober. The average annual rainfall of the district is 20.70 cm. The maximumtemperature in summer is 48.4°C and the minimum temperature in winter is 0.6°C. As aresult there are scorching heat waves in summer and biting cold waves in winter in thewhole district.

There are nine tehsil in district Ganganagar these are Sri Ganganagar, Sri Karanpur,Sadulshahar, Padampur, Raisinghnagar, Suratgarh, Anoopgarh, Shri Vijaynagar,Gharsana.

In 2011, Sri Ganganagar had population of 1,969,168 of which male and female were1,043,340 and 925,828 respectively. The district has a population density of 179inhabitants per square kilometre. Its population growth rate over the decade 2001–2011



was 10.04%. Sri Ganganagar has a sex ratio of 887 females for every 1000 males and aliteracy rate of 69.64%.

9.5 THE SOCIO BACKGROUND AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

The proposed project road is traversing through Hanumangarh and Sri Ganganagardistricts in Rajasthan and socio-economic profiles of the affected PAPs have beenbriefed below:

According to the primary survey there is no any impact on private structures within thecorridor of impact in project.

At this stage of study, only those households are included in the surveys, which arelosing their structures. The analysis of the survey shows that no direct impact onhouseholds along the project road.

9.6 POTENTIAL SOCIAL IMPACT EVALUATION WITHIN THE CORRIDOR OFIMPACT

The Social Impact Assessment at an early stage of social survey aims to identifycongested areas, potential impacts on the community, settlement and on land with theintension to provide the basic information to the Engineering Design team to integrateit with technical design. This assessment was made only on the defined corridor ofimpact of existing road. However, an imprecise assessment of impact on structure wasmade by using screening survey for budgeting purpose so that an estimation of cost ofthe affected structure could be incorporated in Resettlement Budget.

This chapter will analyze the impact on population, structures and land on the exitingcorridor only.

9.6.1 Properties Likely to be affected

The properties likely to be affected by the proposed improvement of the road in thisproject are about 6 structures. These are government and community structures.

The estimated numbers of properties have been analyzed under different categories,such as private, religious, government and community etc. These divisions have beenmade according to their use and occupancy. Out of the total number of properties thatare likely to be affected, 5 are government properties and 1 is community properties areaffected and have no private ownership (Table 9.1).

Table 9.3: Impact on Structures in Project Road Sections

Sl. No. Type of Properties Total Percentage1 Private 0 0.02 Religious 0 0.03 Government 5 83.34 Community 1 16.7

Total 6 100.0Source: Census Survey, Aecom, 2015

· Government Properties likely to be affected

The survey data shows that there are 5 government properties that are likely to beaffected in proposed project road. The Government properties include Bus Stand and TaxOffice.



· Community properties Likely to be affected along the Road

The survey revealed that there is 1 community property likely to be affected due toproposed project road. The community properties include 1 well.

9.6.2 Preliminary Land Acquisition

As per PWD requirement, the widening of the existing road is to be done withinexisting ROW with 2-lane with Gravel Shoulder. The social assessment of the projectroad was done within defined corridor of impact, so that if required, the impact onproperties, population and other assets can be considered with ease. Efforts have beenmade during feasibility design of horizontal alignment to accommodate the ProposedHighway within the available ROW, without compromising best engineering solutionwith the design standards have been adopted to avoid private land acquisition andresettlement impact minimized. Hence there is no additional land is required.

9.7 DETAILED ENTITLEMENT MATRIX

As per the provisions mentioned in the broad entitlement framework of RFCTLARRA2013 the detailed entitlement matrix is worked out for providing compensation to theentitled families and properties. The detailed entitlement matrix has been developed tosummarize entitlements for this project is given in the Table 9.2.

Table 9.2: Entitlement Matrix

All awards below shall be exempt from income tax, stamp duty and fees.

Type of Loss Definition ofEntitled Person Compensation Policy Responsible

Agency1 Land1.a Loss of private land

- agricultural land,1- homestead/commercial land- vacant plot

Legal titleholders/traditionaltitleholders2

· Compensation at replacementcost or as calculated undersection 26 of LARR Act 2013

· One time 50,000 ResettlementAllowance as per LARR Act2013 if family needs tophysically relocate to differentarea

· 90 days advance notice torelocate

IA/CSC will ensuresufficient provisionof notice

NGO/ Consultantwill validate andverify AP list jointlywith IA.

1.b Loss of rented privateland and governmentland

Tenants,leaseholders andSharecroppers (withlease documents)

· Assistance for rental deposit orunexpired lease deducted fromthe land owner’s compensation.

· 60 days advance notice toharvest standing seasonal cropsprior to damage, if notice cannotbe given, compensation forshare of crops will be provided(see entitlement No. 3.a).

NGO/Consultantwill confirm tenants’eligibility

IA/ CSC will ensureprovision of notice.

1.c Loss of Governmentland

Non-titled holders(i.e. Squatters3,Encroachers4)

· Compensation for assets lost atreplacement cost (see EM 2.a).


1 The RFCLARRA 2013 outlines that no irrigated multi-cropped land shall be acquired under this Act, expect inexceptional circumstances, as demonstrable last resort. Wherever such land is acquired, an equivalent area ofcultivable land shall be developed for agricultural purposes or an amount equivalent to the value of land acquiredshall be deposited with the appropriate Government for investment in agriculture for enhancing food security.Such costs must be reflected in the resettlement budget.

2 Traditional land rights refer to households with customary rights to land, and shall be treated equivalent totitleholders




Agency· 90 days advance notice to shift· 60 days advance notice to

harvest standing seasonal cropsprior to damage, if notice cannotgiven, compensation for share ofcrops will be provided (seeentitlement No. 3.a).

NGO/ Consultantwill confirm affectedhousehold’seligibility

1.d Temporary loss ofland

Legal titleholders · Rent at market value for theperiod of occupation.

· Compensation for assets atreplacement cost

· Restoration of land to previousor better quality

· Location of construction campswill be fixed by contractors inconsultation with Governmentand local community.

Contractornegotiates amountwith landowner –supervised by CSC.

IA/CSC ensurescompensation paidprior to take-over.

Contractorresponsible for siterestoration.

2 Structures2.a Loss of residential,

commercial structuresand other assets

Legal titleholdersEncroachers andsquatters

· If partially affected5:Replacement cost of the affectedpart or assets with right tosalvage materials. If remainderof the structure is unviable, theowner has the option to claimcompensation for entirestructure (see below).

· Restoration grant of 10% ofreplacement cost of structure.6

· If Residential/ Commercialstructure fully affected:

· Replacement Cost of thestructure

· If relocating outside RoW,Resettlement Allowance of Rs.50,000 per family as per LARRAct 2013.7

· Monthly Subsistence Allowanceof Rs. 3,000 for one year (totalRs. 36,000) for families havingto relocate their homesteads asper LARR Act 2013.8

· Shifting allowance of 10% ofreplacement cost of structure upto a maximum of Rs 50,000, asper the LARR Act 2013

· Right to salvage materials fromstructure and other assets

NGO/Consultantwill confirmtitleholder’seligibility


3 Squatters are those who have no recognizable legal rights on the land they are occupying4 Encroachers are those who use land or build structures which are in whole or in part of an adjacent property to

which they have no titles.5 External to the living/commercial areas (i.e. verandahs, stairs)6 This have been added given that in the context of this RP, the concentration of impacts relate to structures beingpartially affected and as such it is a needed additional assistance measure.7 Not cumulative if Resettlement Allowance has been given for loss of land (Entitlement 1.a)8 Households losing commercial structures are not eligible




Agencywithout deductions fromreplacement cost.

· 90 day notice to vacatestructure.

2.b Loss of residential/commercial structureand other assets

Tenants (withoutdocumentation) andleaseholders

· Replacement cost of part/wholeof structure – if latter has beenconstructed by thetenant/leaseholder with right tosalvage material

· Compensation for rental depositor unexpired lease (only for APwith legitimate leasedocumentation). This will bededucted from thecompensation amount of thestructure owner.

· Lump-sum equivalent to twomonth lease to support search ofalternative housing.

NGO/Consultantwill confirm tenants’eligibility


2.c Loss and temporaryimpacts on commonproperty resources

Titled and non-titledowners/communities

· Replacement or restoration ofthe affected community facilities

· Best efforts need to be made toavoid impacts on sensitive sites(i.e. religious, sacred). If theseneed to be relocated orrehabilitated additional level ofconsultation with community isrequired to ensure properprocess

IA/ CSC will assesshow to avoidsensitive sites

NGO/Consultantwill conductadditionalconsultations

3 Loss of crops and trees3.a Loss of trees and

cropsLegal titleholder/tenant/lease-holder/share-cropper/non-titledAP

· 60 days advance notice toharvest standing seasonal cropsprior to damage, fruits andtimber

· Compensation for standingcrops (or share of crop forsharecroppers) based on anannual crop cycle at marketvalue.

· Compensation for trees basedon timber value at market price,and compensation for perennialcrops and fruit trees at annualnet product market valuemultiplied by remainingproductive years; to bedetermined in consultation withthe Forest Department fortimber trees and theHorticulture Department forother trees/crops.

NGO/Consultantwill confirm affectedhousehold eligibility

IA/ CSC will ensurenotice is provided.

4 Loss of livelihood4.1 Loss of livelihood

incomeLegal Titleholder/tenant/leaseholder/non-titled holder offully affected

· Loss of business income/wages: One time financialassistance based on three monthincome10 or Rs. 25,000 as per

NGO/Consultantwill confirm affectedhousehold eligibility




Agencycommercialstructure9

Employee ofaffected commercialstructure.Farmer/agricultural workerof land acquired.

RFCLARRA 2013, whichever ishigher

4.2 Temporary disruptionof livelihood

Legal titleholders,non-titled AHs

· 90 days advance noticeregarding constructionactivities, including durationand type of disruption.

· Economic Disruption Grant ofRs. 3,000/week whencommercial structure is partiallyaffected and owner loses incometo rebuild part of structure orbecause of constructionactivities.

· Assistance11 to mobile vendors/hawkers to temporarily shift forcontinued economic activityduring construction activities.

IA/ CSC will ensurenotice is provided.

5 Special Assistance to Vulnerable Households5.1 Impacts on

VulnerableHouseholds (VAHs)and Severely AffectedHouseholds (SAHs)12

VulnerableHouseholdsSeverely AffectedHouseholds

· Rs. 50,000 for each physicallydisplaced family13.

· Participation of one member ofhousehold in LivelihoodImprovement and SkillsDevelopment Training

· Priority of employment underthe project during constructionand implementation for onefamily member to extentpossible.

NGO/ Consultant toconfirm VAH/ SAHlist

NGO/Consultant toconduct assessmentof skillsdevelopment

6 Common Resources6.1 Loss and temporary

impacts on commonresources

Communities · Replacement or restoration ofthe affected community facilities– including public water standposts, public utility posts,temples, shrines, etc.

NGO will identifyand conduct aconsultation withthe community &PIU and Contractorwill restore and/orcompensate theaffected CPR in linewith ADB’s SPS,2009.

7 Other losses

10 Based on income tax return9 When core commercial space is affected – when external sections of the structures such as verandahs, stairs,balcony are affected the owner will not be eligible to this entitlement.11 Assistance will be provided in accommodating a temporary space for commercial activities during construction,

dismantling and reassembling mobile structure and in physically relocating structure12 Severely Affected Households (SAHs): defined as losing 10% or more of their total productive assets and/or

physical displacement13 Severely Affected Households (SAHs) and Vulnerable Households (VAHs) losing their homestead and having

to physically relocate from affected area




Agency7.1 Any other loss not

identified· Unanticipated involuntary

impacts will be documented andmitigated based on ADB’sSafeguard Policy (SPS), 2009.

NGO/Consultant toidentify otherpotential losses

9.7.1 Applicable Legislation and Policies

Table 9.3 presents the important regulations and legislations relevant to proposedproject road project.

Table 9.3: Relevant Regulations and LegislationsS.

No Act / Rules Purpose ApplicableYes/ No

Reason forApplicability Authority

1.

The Right to FairCompensation and

Transparency in LandAcquisition and

Rehabilitation andResettlement 2013

Set out rule foracquisition. of

land bygovernment

Yes

This act will beapplicable to as therewill be acquisition of

land for Road.

LandAcquisitionCollector,

Departmentof Housing,

GoR.

2. EnvironmentProtection Act-1986

To protect andimprove overall

environmentYes

As all environmentalnotifications, rules and

schedules are issuedunder this act.

MoEF. GoI;DoE, State

Gov. CPCB;SPCB

3.Air (Prevention andControl of Pollution)

Act, 1981

To control airpollution by &

Transportcontrolling

emission of airDepartment.

Pollutants as perthe prescribed

standards.

Yes

This act will beapplicable duringconstruction; for

obtaining NOC forestablishment of hotmix plant, workers'camp, construction

camp, etc.

SPCB

4. Water Prevention andControl of Pollution)

Act1974

To control waterpollution bycontrolling

discharge ofpollutants as per

the prescribedstandards

Yes This act will beapplicable duringconstruction for

(establishments of hotmix plant, constructioncamp, workers' camp,

etc.

SPCB

5. Noise Pollution(Regulation and

Control Act) 1990

The standards fornoise for day andnight have beenpromulgated by

the MoEF forvarious land

uses.

Yes This act will beapplicable as vehicularnoise on project routesrequired to assess for

future years andnecessary protectionmeasure need to be

considered in design.

SPCB

9.8 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION AND PEOPLES PERCEPTION

The process of information propagation about the project is one of the major tools toensure and initiate the participation of the stakeholders. This also helps in collectingrelevant information, feedback from various stakeholders for the social requirements ofthe project. Several group consultations were held at different locations with the people



to apprise them about the development of the project and document their views,feedback and concern about the project so that their outlook can be incorporated in theengineering design. Relevant data was taken from them which included demographicfeatures, available resources, land rates and other important features. The key activitiesof the consultation process are summarized in Table 9.4.

The detailed findings and attended persons during public consultation are attached inAnnexure-9.1.

Table 9.4: Village wise Scheduled Public Consultations and FGDSl.No.

VillageName Date No. of

ParticipantsTypes ofPC/FGD Photographs

1 Patli Barrier 01/07/2015 07 PC & FGD withCommunity

2 Kheruwala 01/07/2015 05 PublicConsultation

3 Dholipal 01/07/2015 08 PC & FGD withBusinessman

4 Sattipura 01/07/2015 11 PC & FGD withBusinessman

As the project implementation will be done through government departments and theprocess of resettlement and rehabilitation needs humane approach as well as closenessto the people and community service orientation, it was necessary to find out thecapacity of the existing NGOs and CBOs to involve them in rehabilitation and



resettlement work. Several NGOs were identified and examined on the basis of theirpast work performance, areas of work experience and its organizational set-up etc.,however, the capacity assessment of the concerned NGOs in detail could not be carriedout at the time. Its Capacity assessment will be done at the time of census and socio-economic surveys at later stage when the Resettlement Plan (RP) will be prepared.

9.9 ESTIMATED R&R BUDGET

The R&R budget for the project road is estimated of Rs. 0.28 Crore. The R&R budgetincludes the replacement cost of structure to be provided to the affected people,replacement cost of government and community property etc.

Ø The R&R budget is calculated on the basis on DLC rate collected from DeputyRegistrar Office of the concerned district.

Ø The budget for the compensation of affected structures is based on the rates ofvarious types as described in Basic Schedule Rates (BSR), PWD, Govt. of Rajasthan,2013 (SOR-2013).

The rate for permanent structures without land has been designed at Rs. 13,500/m2,semi-permanent structures at Rs. 10,000/m2, temporary structures at the rate of Rs.4,500/m2 and Boundary wall at the rate of Rs. 3,000/RM and the R&R assistance to theaffected persons has been calculated as per the Entitlement Matrix. The Table 9.5 showthe item wise cost estimates of resettlement.

If there is delay in project implementation, the Valuation committee will determine thereplacement cost at the BSR’s updated rate.

Table 9.5: Estimated R & R Budget

Ref.No. Component Unit Unit Rate

Quantity(Sq.

Mtrs.)

Amount(in Rs.)

A Land & Building1 Land Cost Hectare 4693260 0 0

Displaced Structure2 Permanent Sq.m 13500 0 03 Semi-Permanent Sq.m 10000 0 04 Temporary Sq.m 4500 0 0

Total sum (A) 0 0B Partially Affected Structures5 Permanent Sq.m 13500 0 06 Semi-Permanent Sq.m 10000 0 07 Temporary Sq.m 4500 0 08 Boundary Wall Rm 3000 0 0

Total sum (B) 0 0C R&R Assistance

1 Building restoration grant forpartially affected structures Sq.m

10% of totalcompensation ofstructure (As perEM of RF in Sl.No.2.a

0 0

2 Assistance for loss of incomeRs. 9,000 (equivalentto Rs. 3,000 for 3weeks)

0 0

3 Resettlement Allowances Households 50000 0 0



Ref.No. Component Unit Unit Rate

Quantity(Sq.

Mtrs.)

Amount(in Rs.)

4 Subsistence allowance forresidential owners Households 36000 0 0

5 Shifting Allowances 50000 0 0

6 Loss of Livelyhood income HouseholdsOne time financialassistance based on

3 month income0 0

7

Special Assistance for vulnerablehouseholds (LivelihoodImprovement and SkillsDevelopment Training)

Households 4000 0 0

Total sum (C) Total 0D Community Assets

1Government Structure

Sq.m 13500 43.75Sq.Mtrs 590625

(3-Bus Stand)2 1-Tax Office Unit 100000 1 100000

3CPRs

Unit 75000 1 75000(1-Well)Total sum (D) Total 765625

E Implementation Arrangement1 RP Implementation Agency Lump sum 1000000 1000000

2 Independent evaluationconsultant** Lump sum 500000 500000

3Administrative expenses (GRM,field trips, arrangement ofmeetings etc.)

Lump sum 150000 150000

4 Dissemination of Entitlementmatrix, RP, etc. Lump sum 150000 150000

Total Sum (E) Total 1800000 TOTAL (A+B+C+D+E) 2565625

Contingency 10% 256563Grand Total 2822188

In crores 0.28

9.10 CONCLUSION

In brief, the portrayal of initial assessment of social impact was nothing but an effort todepict the existing social scenario along the project road and perceived impacts onpopulation due to implementation of the project with an intention to minimize theresettlement. A proper attention is required to take account of social consideration inthe project planning and implementation as per policy of the Government of India,applicable resettlement policy and local needs of the people.

In finalizing the design, the mitigation of social report and views expressed by the localcommunity during consultation, especially the threat of displacement and negativeimpact on their business opportunities and livelihood has been taken into consideration.

Section :

From

(km)

To

(km)

Type

(m)

Width

(m)

Type

#

Width

(m)

Exists

(F/NF)*

Does

not

exist**

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

0.000 1.000 P BU 20 12 to 15BT/CC/

GRAW7 Gravel 2 0.0 F - -

1.000 2.000 P BU 20 12 to 15BT/GRA

WEL7 Gravel 3.0 0.0 - - -

2.000 3.000 P BU 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 2.0 0.0 - - -

3.000 4.000 P BU 30 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 2.0 0.0 F - -

4.000 5.000 P BU 30 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 2.0 0.0 - - -

5.000 6.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 2.0 0.0 - - -

6.000 7.000 P AG/BU 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 2.0 0.0 - - -

7.000 8.000 P AG/BU 20 to 25 12 to 15 CC/BT 6/7 Earth 2.0 0.0 - - -

8.000 9.000 P AG 25 to 30 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 2.0 0.0 - - -

9.000 10.000 P AG 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 2.0 0.0 - - -

10.000 11.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

11.000 12.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 -0.8 - - -

12.000 13.000 P AG 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

13.000 14.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 -1.0 - - -

Road side Drain

PERFORMA - 1

CARRIAGEWAY SHOULDER AverageHeight of

Embankment or

depth of cutting

(m)

Service

Roads,if

any

1

ROAD INVENTORY

Remarks

KM. 0 to KM. 43 of SH-7A (Hanumangarh to

Abohar)

Chainage

Type of

Terrain

Land Use

@

Right of

Way (m)

Roadway

Width

Date of Survey : 27-06-2014

Section :

From

(km)

To

(km)

Type

(m)

Width

(m)

Type

#

Width

(m)

Exists

(F/NF)*

Does

not

exist**

Road side Drain

PERFORMA - 1


Embankment or

depth of cutting

(m)

Service

Roads,if

any

ROAD INVENTORY

Remarks


Abohar)

Chainage

Type of

Terrain

Land Use

@

Right of

Way (m)

Roadway

Width


14.000 15.000 P AG 25 to 30 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 -2.5 - - -

15.000 16.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

16.000 17.000 P BU 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 -3.0 - - -

17.000 18.000 P BU 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

18.000 19.000 P AG/BU 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 -3.0 - - -

19.000 20.000 P AG 25 to 30 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 1.0 - - -

20.000 21.000 P AG 25 to 30 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

21.000 22.000 P AG 25 to 30 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

22.000 23.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

23.000 24.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

24.000 25.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

25.000 26.000 P AG 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

26.000 27.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

27.000 28.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -


Section :

From

(km)

To

(km)

Type

(m)

Width

(m)

Type

#

Width

(m)

Exists

(F/NF)*

Does

not

exist**

Road side Drain

PERFORMA - 1


Embankment or

depth of cutting

(m)

Service

Roads,if

any

ROAD INVENTORY

Remarks


Abohar)

Chainage

Type of

Terrain

Land Use

@

Right of

Way (m)

Roadway

Width



30.000 31.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -


32.000 33.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -


34.000 35.000 P AG 20 to 25 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -


36.000 37.000 P AG 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

37.000 38.000 P AG 10 to 15 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.0 0.0 - - -

38.000 39.000 P AG/BU 10 to 15 12 to 15 BT/CC 7 Earth 1.0 0.0 - - -

39.000 40.000 P AG 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

40.000 41.000 P AG 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -

41.000 42.000 P AG 15 to 20 12 to 15 BT 7 Earth 1.5 0.0 - - -


NOTE: @ Land use, indicate built-up, agriculture,barren, industrial, forest etc.

# For type of carriageway/shoulder, indicate CC/BT/Metalled/Gravel/Earth

Section :

From

(km)

To

(km)

Type

(m)

Width

(m)

Type

#

Width

(m)

Exists

(F/NF)*

Does

not

exist**

Road side Drain

PERFORMA - 1


Embankment or

depth of cutting

(m)

Service

Roads,if

any

ROAD INVENTORY

Remarks


Abohar)

Chainage

Type of

Terrain

Land Use

@

Right of

Way (m)

Roadway

Width


Remarks: Indicate history of submergence or any other information of significance.

* F=Functional; NF=Non-functional

** If side drain does not exist, put a X mark.

Indicate section in built-up area, sections requiring raising.

SH-Rajsthan

LHS RHS

0.000 1.000 Fair fair fair

1.000 2.000 Fair fair fair

2.000 3.000 Fair fair Good

3.000 4.000 Fair fair Good

4.000 5.000 Fair poor poor

5.000 6.000 Poor poor poor

6.000 7.000 Fair poor poor

7.000 8.000 Fair _ poor

8.000 9.000 Fair _ poor

9.000 10.000 Fair _ poor

11.000 12.000 Fair _ poor

12.000 13.000 Fair _ _

13.000 14.000 Fair _ poor

14.000 15.000 Fair _ poor

15.000 16.000 Fair _ poor

16.000 17.000 Fair _ poor

PERFORMA - 4

Road Name: SH-7A

Section: Hanumangarh to Abohar (Up to Punjab Boarder)

Length affected with Shoulder

drop more than 50mmRemarks

Road Condition Survey

Chainage (Km)

From To

Visual Condition of

Shoulders

(Good/fair/Poor)

Visual Condition of

pavement

(Good/fair/Poor)

Visual Condition of Side

slopes and embankment

(Good/fair/Poor)

Visual Condition of road

side drain

(Good/fair/Poor)

fair&Poor

fair

Good

Good

fair

fair

fair

Good

Good

Good

Good

fair

poor

poor

fair

fair

17.000 18.000 Fair _ poor

18.000 19.000 Fair _ poor

19.000 20.000 Fair _ poor

20.000 21.000 Fair _ poor

21.000 22.000 Fair _ Good

22.000 23.000 Fair _ Fair

23.000 24.000 Fair _ Fair

24.000 25.000 Fair _ Fair

25.000 26.000 Fair _ Fair

26.000 27.000 Fair _ Fair

27.000 28.000 Fair _ Fair

28.000 29.000 Fair _ Fair

29.000 30.000 Fair _ Fair

30.000 31.000 Fair _ Fair

31.000 32.000 Fair _ Fair

32.000 33.000 Fair _ Fair

33.000 34.000 Fair _ Fair

34.000 35.000 Fair _ Fair

35.000 36.000 Fair _ Fair

36.000 37.000 Fair _ Fair

37.000 38.000 Fair _ Fair

fair

fair

fair

fair&Poor

poor

fair

fair

fair

Good

Good

Good

fair&Poor

fair

Good&fair

good

fair

Good

Good

Good/poor

fair

fair/poor

38.000 39.000 Fair _ Fair

39.000 40.000 Fair _ Fair

40.000 41.000 Fair _ Fair

41.000 42.000 Fair _ Fair

42.000 43.000 Fair _ Fair

Information will be given in block of one kilometer each i.e from km 0.000 to 1.000km,1.000 km to 2.000 km

Shoulder drop will be Counted when it is more then 50 mm in depth

fair

fair/poor

fair/poor

fair/poor

fair

Road Name : HANUMANGARH TO ABOHAR SH-7(A)

Section : 0.00 TO 43.00 KMs. Date of Survey : 27-Jun-14

Sl. Type of Height above

No. Structures Bed Level

(Pipe, Slab, U/S Side D/S Side

Box, Arch) (m) (m)

1 2 3 4 56 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

1 3.125 SLAB 1.700 1 0.800 11.000 7.000 1.00 1.00 POOR X X X P/POOR RECONS. YES X

2 3.405 SLAB 2.500 1 3.000 10.700 6.800 1.50 1.50 POOR X X X P/POOR RECONS. NO X




6 7.415 SLAB 1.600 1 0.700 10.700 7.000 1.50 1.50 GOOD X X X P/GOOD X YES X


8 8.688 SLAB 1.600 1 0.500 12.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 GOOD X X X P/GOOD X NO X

9 9.212 SLAB 2.500 1 0.800 11.400 7.000 - - GOOD X X X P/GOOD X YES X

Whether

waterway

adequate

(Yes/No)

RemarksCarriageway

(m)

Condition Assessment

Parapet/

Handrail

Recommendation on

widening/

reconstruction etc

PERFORMA - 2

Road No

Width of culvert

Head

wall

Wing

wall

Total (m)

Condition Assessment*

Box,Slab,pi

pe,arch

Return

wall

Length

(m)

Span Arrangement

Number

of Spans

Width of

Span (m)

INVENTORY AND CONDITION SURVEY FOR CULVERTS

Location

(chainage)






Box, Arch) (m) (m)

1 2 3 4 56 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Whether

waterway

adequate

(Yes/No)

RemarksCarriageway

(m)


Parapet/

Handrail

Recommendation on

widening/

reconstruction etc

Road No

Width of culvert

Head

wall

Wing

wall

Total (m)


Box,Slab,pi

pe,arch

Return

wall

Length

(m)

Span Arrangement

Number

of Spans

Width of

Span (m)

Location

(chainage)

10 9.700 SLAB 1.200 1 1.000 11.400 7.000 - - POOR X X X P/GOOD X NO X



13 12.862 PIPE 1.000 1 Dia. = .600 10.000 7.000 - - POOR POOR X X P/GOOD RECONS. YES X

14 13.389 PIPE 2.000 1 Dia. = .600 7.800 7.000 - - FAIR FAIR X X P/GOOD RECONS. YES X

15 13.651 PIPE 2.000 1 Dia. = .600 9.000 7.000 - - POOR POOR X X P/GOOD RECONS. NO X

16 13.910 PIPE 2.000 1 Dia = 0.600 12.000 7.000 - - POOR POOR X X P/POOR RECONS. YES X



19 16.164 SLAB 1.000 1 0.800 12.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 FAIR X X X P/FAIR X NO X






Box, Arch) (m) (m)

1 2 3 4 56 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Whether

waterway

adequate

(Yes/No)

RemarksCarriageway

(m)


Parapet/

Handrail

Recommendation on

widening/

reconstruction etc

Road No

Width of culvert

Head

wall

Wing

wall

Total (m)


Box,Slab,pi

pe,arch

Return

wall

Length

(m)

Span Arrangement

Number

of Spans

Width of

Span (m)

Location

(chainage)

20 16.601 SLAB 3.000 1 0.800 12.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 FAIR X X X P/FAIR RECONS. NO X

21 19.521 SLAB 1.800 1 1.000 12.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 FAIR X X X P/FAIR RECONS. YES X

22 21.291 SYFN 1.000 1 0.300 Dia. Pipe 9.000 7.000 - - POOR POOR X X P/GOOD RECONS. NO X


24 22.317 SLAB 1.600 1 1.000 12.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 FAIR X X X P/FAIR RECONS. NO X

25 22.533 PIPE 1.600 1 0.500 9.000 7.000 0.60 0.60 POOR X X X P/POOR RECONS. NO X

26 24.373 SLAB 2.500 1 1.000 11.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 GOOD X X X P/GOOD X NO X


28 24.883 SLAB 1.000 1 1.200 8.000 7.000 1.00 1.00 FAIR X X X P/FAIR X YES X







Box, Arch) (m) (m)

1 2 3 4 56 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Whether

waterway

adequate

(Yes/No)

RemarksCarriageway

(m)


Parapet/

Handrail

Recommendation on

widening/

reconstruction etc

Road No

Width of culvert

Head

wall

Wing

wall

Total (m)


Box,Slab,pi

pe,arch

Return

wall

Length

(m)

Span Arrangement

Number

of Spans

Width of

Span (m)

Location

(chainage)

30 25.394 PIPE 1.000 1 Blocked 12.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 POOR X X X P/POOR X NO X

31 25.553 SLAB 2.000 1 0.600 10.000 7.000 1.00 1.00 POOR X X X P/POOR X NO X


33 28.114 SLAB 2.500 1 0.500 12.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 POOR POOR X X P/POOR RECONS. YES X

34 28.984 SLAB 2.500 1 1.000 12.000 7.000 - - X X X X YES X











Box, Arch) (m) (m)

1 2 3 4 56 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Whether

waterway

adequate

(Yes/No)

RemarksCarriageway

(m)


Parapet/

Handrail

Recommendation on

widening/

reconstruction etc

Road No

Width of culvert

Head

wall

Wing

wall

Total (m)


Box,Slab,pi

pe,arch

Return

wall

Length

(m)

Span Arrangement

Number

of Spans

Width of

Span (m)

Location

(chainage)





44 35.932 SLAB 2.500 1 1.000 10.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 FAIR X X X P/POOR RECONS. NO X

45 36.098 SLAB 2.500 1 3.500 12.600 7.000 - - POOR X X X P/POOR RECONS. YES X



48 36.859 SLAB 2.000 1 1.000 13.000 7.000 0.80 0.80 FAIR X X X P/POOR RECONS. YES X

49 37.458 SLAB 1.500 1 0.500 10.000 7.000 0.60 0.60 FAIR FAIR X X P/POOR RECONS. NO X






Box, Arch) (m) (m)

1 2 3 4 56 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Whether

waterway

adequate

(Yes/No)

RemarksCarriageway

(m)


Parapet/

Handrail

Recommendation on

widening/

reconstruction etc

Road No

Width of culvert

Head

wall

Wing

wall

Total (m)


Box,Slab,pi

pe,arch

Return

wall

Length

(m)

Span Arrangement

Number

of Spans

Width of

Span (m)

Location

(chainage)

50 38.100 PIPE 1.500 1 Dia = 0.600 7.000 6.800 - - FAIR FAIR X X P/POOR RECONS. YES X

51 38.736 SLAB 1.800 1 0.500 11.000 7.000 1.00 1.00 GOOD X X X P/GOOD NO YES X





*Distressed requiring reconstruction

*Not distressed, only widening required

*No widening or reconstruction required

Remarks:Indicate presence of protection works,scour etc.

INVENTORY OF STRUCTURES Sheet No.

Road Name Road No SH- 7A

Section 0.00 TO 43.00 KMs Date of Survey 27-Jun-14

Location

(Chainage)

Year of

Construction Type of Structure

Type of

Bearing Length (m)* Remarks

Super- Sub- Foundation (m)

structure structure

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

5.100 mi.b - - BT Y 16.6 3 4.2 2.5 7.2 - Y - -

9.950 mi.b - - BT Y 19.5 2 5.6 2.5 7 - Y

16.500 mi.b - - BT Y 8.2 2 4 2.5 7 - Y

22.300 mi.b - - BT Y 7.3 2 3.2 2.5 7 - Y

41.500 mi.b - - BT Y 14 2 3.9 2.5 7 - Y

42.800 mi.b - - BT Y 57 5 11.5 2.5 8 - Y

*face to face of dirt wall **Below bottom of girder/soffit Remarks:Indicate any other feature considered important

HANUMANGHAR TO ABOHAR

Type of

Expansion

Joint

Type of

Wearing Coat

Whether

High level

Yes/No

PERFORMA = 3

Low Water

Level(LWL)

Span or viaduct

arrangement

Number of

Spans

Length of

Span (m)

Design

Discharge

(cumecs)

Average

vertical

clearance**

Protection work

Bed Approaches

High flood

Level (HFL)

Maximum

Design

velocity

(m/sec)

(Bridges and other Structures)

Width of

carriageway

between

kerbs (m)

Width of

Footpath(m)

Whether

water way

adequate

(Yes/No)

0.00 TO 43.00 KMs

From To BearingExpension

Joints

Wearing

Coat

Parapets/Ralling/Cr

ash barriersAbutments

Super

Structure

Approach

slabs

Guide

Bunds

other Protective

work

Other item

specify

5.000 6.000 mi.b Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair

9.000 10.000 mi.b Fair Fair Fair Bad Fair Fair Fair

16.000 17.000 mi.b Bad Bad Bad Bad Bad Fair Fair

22.000 23.000 mi.b Bad Bad Bad Bad Fair Fair Fair

41.000 42.000 mi.b Fair Bad Bad Bad Fair Fair Fair

42.000 43.000 mi.b Fair Fair Fair Bad Fair Fair Fair

Indicate whether the structure requires widening , repairs and /or rehabilitation, addition of spain (waterway)

A detailed report should be furnished for each structure proposed for reconstruction and /or addition of span (increase in length)

Bad

Bad

Bad

Fair

Foundation

Fair

Fair

PERFORMA - 5

Piers

BRIDGE CONDITION SURVEY

Road Name:

Section:

Location (Chainage)Type of

StractureFlooding history Remarks

Condition of

HANUMANGHAR TO ABOHAR

Location : km 08+100 of SH-7A Rajasthan Day 1Direction : Abohar to Hanumangarh Date 23-Aug-14

Passenge Loading8:00 -9:00 133 4 0 28 11 0 0 4 8 0 1 0 2 7 0 0 7 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 09:00-10:00 104 3 0 22 10 2 0 3 6 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 16 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10:00 to 11:00 102 3 1 50 10 3 0 5 16 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 17 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011:00 to 12:00 100 3 1 33 18 4 0 5 7 0 1 0 5 2 0 0 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012:00 to 13:00 107 6 0 25 13 0 0 5 5 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 013:00 to 14:00 86 1 0 26 8 1 3 4 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014:00 to 15:00 40 1 0 24 3 4 1 6 6 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 015:00 to 16:00 42 1 1 28 7 0 0 4 6 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 016:00 to 17:00 62 3 2 37 12 1 0 3 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 017:00 to 18:00 57 1 2 28 6 1 0 5 8 0 1 0 4 1 0 1 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018:00 to 19:00 122 4 0 26 7 4 0 5 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 28 2 12 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 019:00 to 20:00 107 2 1 14 6 1 0 4 4 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 12 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 020:00 to 21:00 19 0 0 19 4 1 0 1 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 021:00 to 22:00 10 0 0 11 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 022:00 to 23:00 3 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 023:00 to 24:00 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:00 to 1:00 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 to 2:00 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 02:00 to 3:00 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 to 4:00 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 to 5:00 6 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 to 6:00 10 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 to 7:00 34 1 0 8 8 3 0 0 5 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 07:00 to 8:00 118 3 0 11 9 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 3 2 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1269 36 8 417 150 28 4 57 105 5 16 3 43 35 4 2 214 27 41 0 9 1 1 0 1 0 0

Location : km 08+100 of SH-7A Rajasthan Day 1Direction : Hanumangarh to Abohar Date 23-Aug-14



Total 1089 45 8 358 128 32 7 70 103 6 10 8 51 39 1 1 177 28 17 4 9 0 0 0 1 0 0

without Car Bus LCV Truc

k

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart

Exempted VehiclesOtherMini

busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME

TractorsCycles3-Axle MAV (4

to 6)7++ Axle

with trailer

Car Bus LCV Truck

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle 3-Axle MAV (4

to 6)7++ Axle

HCM/ EME

TractorsCycles

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cartwith

trailerwithou

t

Classified Traffic Volume Count Survey

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

Bus Mini LCV

LCV

1




Total 1194 31 13 398 137 22 4 42 91 8 21 7 40 41 1 2 198 23 46 0 9 5 5 0 3 3 0




Total 1031 37 7 338 116 26 7 60 85 9 14 6 45 33 1 1 160 23 12 7 11 3 2 2 4 2 0

2-Axle 3-Axle MAV (4 to 6)

7++ Axle

with trailer

without

CyclesCycle

Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart

Exempted VehiclesOther Car Bus LCV Truc

kTaxi

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME

TractorsMinibus

Std.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre


k

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

Private

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME


to 6)7++ Axle

with trailer

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


2




Total 1289 44 14 448 165 42 12 68 119 5 16 3 43 43 5 4 242 48 59 3 14 7 3 1 3 1 0




Total 1113 66 19 380 153 53 20 76 118 29 15 17 64 45 3 4 195 53 40 10 19 6 6 3 5 6 0


k

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME


to 6)7++ Axle

with trailer

Car Bus LCV Truck

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre


to 6)7++ Axle

HCM/ EME

TractorsCycles

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cartwith

trailerwithou

t


Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

Bus Mini LCV

LCV

3




Total 1318 46 12 458 172 49 11 72 126 11 20 8 53 50 4 2 253 58 63 4 18 6 5 3 2 2 0




Total 1136 65 21 383 150 48 18 80 115 35 20 22 63 39 1 1 206 56 45 11 23 9 2 3 4 5 0


7++ Axle

with trailer

without

CyclesCycle

Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


kTaxi

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME

TractorsMinibus

Std.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre


k

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

Private

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME


to 6)7++ Axle

with trailer

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


4




Total 1307 44 15 445 175 37 9 67 130 10 16 6 54 42 4 2 244 47 54 3 15 4 3 4 5 5 0




Total 1140 59 22 382 146 41 14 76 120 25 23 25 59 43 2 2 212 43 47 9 25 6 4 5 5 2 0


k

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME


to 6)7++ Axle

with trailer

Car Bus LCV Truck

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre


to 6)7++ Axle

HCM/ EME

TractorsCycles

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cartwith

trailerwithou

t


Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

Bus Mini LCV

LCV

5




Total 1233 35 11 408 144 25 4 51 98 7 19 6 42 39 3 2 208 26 45 0 9 3 3 0 2 2 0




Total 1063 42 8 350 122 31 7 66 95 8 12 7 48 37 1 1 169 26 15 6 11 3 2 2 3 2 0


7++ Axle

with trailer

without

CyclesCycle

Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


kTaxi

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME

TractorsMinibus

Std.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre


k

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

Private

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME


to 6)7++ Axle

with trailer

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


6




Total 1307 46 13 457 173 47 14 73 124 11 18 8 49 49 5 4 251 55 62 6 20 9 7 4 4 3 0




Total 1128 67 21 383 154 52 20 79 120 36 20 22 67 44 3 4 203 58 47 12 23 14 8 6 8 9 0


k

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

Bus Mini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME


to 6)7++ Axle

with trailer

Car Bus LCV Truck

Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre


to 6)7++ Axle

HCM/ EME

TractorsCycles

Cycle Ricksha

w

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cartwith

trailerwithou

t


Time Interval

2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

Bus Mini LCV

LCV

7


Passenger Loading8:00 -9:00 47 0 0 13 3 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 3 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00-10:00 71 0 0 12 9 7 0 5 7 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 6 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10:00 to 11:00 70 0 3 34 11 4 0 5 8 6 4 7 2 1 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011:00 to 12:00 42 1 1 36 7 1 0 6 5 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 7 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 012:00 to 13:00 44 1 1 24 7 5 2 4 3 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 013:00 to 14:00 55 0 3 22 12 1 1 11 8 1 6 3 2 0 0 0 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 014:00 to 15:00 47 1 1 14 12 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 015:00 to 16:00 42 1 0 22 5 3 0 4 4 1 0 0 3 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 016:00 to 17:00 56 1 0 31 8 1 1 6 6 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 5 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 017:00 to 18:00 65 3 0 25 10 1 0 6 11 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 5 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 018:00 to 19:00 67 0 0 28 12 4 0 5 10 5 3 3 6 5 0 2 11 4 4 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 019:00 to 20:00 40 4 0 24 1 3 0 5 3 2 0 2 6 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 020:00 to 21:00 24 0 0 10 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 021:00 to 22:00 14 0 0 11 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 022:00 to 23:00 5 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 023:00 to 24:00 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0:00 to 1:00 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 to 2:00 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 to 3:00 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 to 4:00 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 to 5:00 7 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 to 6:00 8 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 to 7:00 22 0 0 5 2 0 0 3 2 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 to 8:00 27 0 0 9 3 1 2 3 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 753 12 9 356 123 31 6 75 88 22 23 21 64 41 0 5 62 37 30 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0





Total 700 7 10 285 200 8 11 58 83 19 21 18 62 36 0 1 67 22 38 0 12 0 1 1 1 0 0

without trailer Car Bus LCV Truck

Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME


to 6) 7++ Axle with trailer

Car Bus LCV Truck

Time Interval 2-Wheeler

3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre


to 6) 7++ AxleHCM/ EME

TractorsCycles Cycle

RickshawAnimal-

CartHand-Cartwith

trailerwithout trailer



3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

BusMini LCV

LCV

8





Total 696 11 8 360 141 41 8 77 105 14 17 18 69 44 0 2 85 39 32 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0





Total 494 14 1 308 106 22 7 61 68 8 14 13 54 30 0 1 56 28 23 1 5 0 1 1 1 0 0

2-Axle 3-Axle MAV (4 to 6) 7++ Axle with


Cycles Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart

Exempted VehiclesOther Car Bus LCV TruckTaxi

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME

TractorsMinibus

Std.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre



3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

Private

Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME




3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


9





Total 633 3 2 424 119 21 4 68 59 4 12 5 66 44 0 0 45 22 13 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0





Total 633 3 1 460 132 32 1 63 80 4 11 13 61 49 0 1 49 15 7 3 1 0 2 0 1 0 0


Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME



Car Bus LCV Truck


3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre




RickshawAnimal-

CartHand-Cartwith




3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

BusMini LCV

LCV

10





Total 812 23 21 365 142 51 13 94 110 34 36 40 85 48 4 9 78 52 48 21 32 13 4 3 4 2 0





Total 740 19 25 305 214 20 21 67 97 30 38 35 75 49 2 5 79 32 52 6 23 4 4 3 4 4 0




Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME

TractorsMinibus

Std.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre



3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

Private

Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME




3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


11





Total 785 18 17 362 133 43 11 86 100 30 32 31 75 45 3 7 71 45 41 13 22 7 4 3 4 2 0





Total 722 14 19 296 208 15 17 63 91 26 31 27 69 43 2 5 74 28 46 5 18 4 3 3 4 3 0


Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME



Car Bus LCV Truck


3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre




RickshawAnimal-

CartHand-Cartwith




3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

BusMini LCV

LCV

12





Total 729 15 13 365 139 41 10 82 103 23 24 25 72 47 0 5 76 42 36 6 11 0 2 0 0 0 0





Total 605 15 8 304 160 19 12 62 82 17 22 21 63 39 0 2 66 28 35 1 11 0 2 2 2 0 0




Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME

TractorsMinibus

Std.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre



3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

Private

Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME




3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


13





Total 727 17 16 402 137 39 11 87 89 23 30 26 81 52 3 6 66 42 36 11 22 7 4 3 5 2 0





Total 689 15 16 386 178 31 15 69 92 22 32 29 72 55 2 6 68 28 31 6 15 4 5 3 5 3 0


Cycle Rickshaw

Animal-Cart

Hand-Cart


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre

LCV6 Tyre 2-Axle

BusMini LCV

LCV HCM/ EME



Car Bus LCV Truck


3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi


busStd.bus

LCV4 Tyre




RickshawAnimal-

CartHand-Cartwith




3-Wheeler Car

Jeep & Van

PrivateTaxi

BusMini LCV

LCV

14

101 102 103 201 202 301 302 303 304 305 Total

101 Hanumangarh 0%

102 Khairuwala,Dholipal 0% 0%

103 Abohar,Sadul,Hatyawala 27% 0% 0%

201 Sri Ganganagar, matili 1% 0% 0% 0%

202 Rest of Rajasthan 3% 0% 7% 1% 0%

301 Punjab 8% 0% 0% 0% 16% 0%

302 Jammu/Himachal 5% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 0%

303 Haryana 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

304 MP/Gujarat 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 5% 1% 1% 0%

305 South India 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0%

23% 0% 17% 2% 21% 18% 10% 1% 5% 3% 100%

101 102 103 201 202 301 302 303 304 305 Total

101 Hanumangarh 0%

102 Khairuwala,Dholipal 1% 0%

103 Abohar,Sadul,Hatyawala 46% 21% 0%

201 Sri Ganganagar, matili 6% 3% 0% 0%

202 Rest of Rajasthan 4% 0% 7% 0% 1%

301 Punjab 6% 1% 3% 0% 0% 0%

302 Jammu/Himachal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

303 Haryana 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

304 MP/Gujarat 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

305 South India 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

32% 13% 39% 4% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

Zones

Influence Factor

Zones

Influence Factor

OD Matrix for Goods Vehicles

OD Matrix for Passenger Vehicles

Project Road - SH 7A Date:22/08/014Location:Km 28+300 of SH-7A Direction: Hanumangarh to Abohar

Sr. No.

Vehicle Type

No. of Passengers Origin Destination

Front 1st Wheel Load (kg)

Front 1st Axle Load (KN)

Rear 1st Wheel Load (kg)

Rear 1st Axle Load (kN)

VDF

1 Bus 45 Hanumangarh Abohar 2010 39 2890 57 0.392 Bus 50 Hanumangarh Sadul 2220 44 2990 59 0.493 Bus 45 Hanumangarh Bhadra 4120 81 2910 57 2.654 Bus 50 Hanumangarh Abohar 2150 42 3010 59 0.475 Bus 30 Hanumangarh Abohar 2090 41 3710 73 0.84

VDF 0.97

Project Road - SH 7A Date:22/08/014Location:Km 28+300 of SH-7A Direction: Abohar to Hanumangarh

Sr. No.

Vehicle Type

Comodity Type Origin Destination





VDF

1 Bus 20 Abhoar Hanumangarh 1850 36 2510 49 0.24

2 Bus 40 Abhoar Bhadra 2070 41 2920 57 0.42

3 Bus 60 Abhoar Hanumangarh 2510 49 3240 64 0.73VDF 0.46

AXLE LOAD SURVEY

1


Sr. No.

Vehicle Type






VDF

1 LCV 4W Parchune Hanumangarh Sadul 998 20 2390 47 0.282 LCV 6W Biscuit Hanumangarh Abohar 2150 42 4350 85 1.473 LCV 6W Spoon Hanumangarh Sadul 2410 47 2820 55 0.514 LCV 6W Namkin Bikaner Amritsar 1040 20 2350 46 0.12

VDF 0.60


Sr. No.

Vehicle Type






VDF

5 LCV 6W Milk Abhoar Hanumangarh 1410 28 1220 24 0.04

6 LCV 6W Animal Food Abhoar Hanumangarh 2100 41 5280 104 2.97

18 LCV 6W Empty Abhoar Hanumangarh 1110 22 1090 21 0.02

1 LCV 6W Churi Kilot Hanumangarh 1146 22 4050 79 0.99

6 LCV 6W Foam Himachal Hanumangarh 1180 23 1650 32 0.04VDF 0.81

AXLE LOAD SURVEY

2


Sr. No. Vehicle Type

Comodity Type Origin Destinati

on





VDF

1 2 Axle Gas Bikaner Abohar 1490 29 2990 59 0.33VDF 0.33

AXLE LOAD SURVEY

3


Sr. No.

Vehicle Type





Rear 2nd Wheel Load (kg)

Rear Tandem

Axle Load (kN)

VDF

1 3 Axle Banana Maharastra Amratsar 3270 64 5610 5200 212 5.172 3 Axle Dhaga Karnatak Panjab 3050 60 4720 4820 187 3.283 3 Axle Banana Nandu Podpur 2990 59 5760 5580 222 5.774 3 Axle Bamboo Indore Ambala 2440 48 4750 4150 175 2.235 3 Axle Empty Panjab Jaipur 1730 34 1850 1760 71 0.136 3 Axle Dal Hanumangarh Pathankot 3400 67 6560 6800 262 10.957 3 Axle Dal Hanumangarh Pathankot 3450 68 6670 6920 267 11.718 3 Axle Sarso Gujrat Ganganagar 2600 51 940 10520 225 5.719 3 Axle Marble Kishangarh Kashmir 2120 42 5240 5860 218 4.86

VDF 5.53


Sr. No.

Vehicle Type





Rear 2nd Wheel Load (kg)

Rear Tandem

Axle Load (kN)

VDF

1 3 Axle Apple Jammu Indore 3160 62 4150 4520 170 2.57

2 3 Axle Apple Jammu Hanumangarh 2560 50 5020 5260 98 0.55

3 3 Axle Engine Panjab Hanumangarh 4050 79 6320 6580 253 10.79

4 3 Axle Engine Amratsar Nagpur 4030 79 5810 5950 231 8.10

5 3 Axle Kambal Himanchal Hanumangarh 3040 60 4730 4080 93 0.86

6 3 Axle Medicine Jammu Akola(MH) 3440 67 4770 4050 173 3.03

7 3 Axle Medicine Jammu Akola(MH) 3420 67 4690 3990 170 2.89

8 3 Axle Medicine Jammu Hanumangarh 2140 42 1960 1710 72 0.23

9 3 Axle Milk Porwar Savatsar 2110 41 2070 1728 75 0.23

10 3 Axle Empty Pathankot Jaipur 2570 50 1800 1580 66 0.40

11 3 Axle Empty Abhoar Hanumangarh 2110 41 1814 1740 70 0.21

12 3 Axle Empty Sadul Hanumangarh 2050 40 1810 1690 69 0.19

13 3 Axle Empty Ganganagar Hanumangarh 2340 46 1980 1720 73 0.31

14 3 Axle Empty Abhoar Hanumangarh 2120 42 1850 1740 70 0.22

15 3 Axle Empty Sadul Hanumangarh 2050 40 1840 1720 70 0.20

16 3 Axle Amratsar Indore 4130 81 7630 3740 223 7.58VDF 2.40

AXLE LOAD SURVEY

4


Sr. No.

Vehicle Type


Front 1st

Wheel Load (kg)

Front 1st

Axle Load (KN)

Front 2nd

Wheel Load (kg)

Front 2nd Axle Load (KN)

Rear 1st

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear 1st

Axle Load (kN)

Rear 2nd

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear 3rd

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear Tandem

Axle Load (kN)

Rear 4th

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear Tridem

Axle Load (kN)

VDF

1 4 Axle Cement Bikaner Jalandhar 2320 46 5750 113 5870 6057 234 234 10.452 4 Axle Marble Kishangarh Jammu 2720 53 7158 140 6820 134 6250 256 18.963 4 Axle Sarso Ravatsar Jammu 2210 43 6760 133 4900 6700 228 228 13.344 4 Axle Sarso Ravatsar Jammu 2230 44 6870 135 5320 7200 246 246 15.855 5 Axle Marble Kishangarh Kashmir 2054 40 5190 102 6580 129 4870 225 8.08

VDF 13.34


Sr. No.

Vehicle Type


Front 1st

Wheel Load (kg)

Front 1st

Axle Load (KN)

Front 2nd

Wheel Load (kg)

Front 2nd Axle Load (KN)

Rear 1st

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear 1st

Axle Load (kN)

Rear 2nd

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear 3rd

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear Tandem

Axle Load (kN)

Rear 4th

Wheel Load (kg)

Rear Tridem

Axle Load (kN)

VDF

1 4 Axle Engine Amratsar Nagpur 3502 69 3246 64 5250 5220 205 5.88

2 4 Axle Khajur Amratsar Indore 5104 100 1250 25 8510 8240 167 7.26

3 4 Axle Khajur Amratsar Indore 5170 101 2130 42 8580 8310 168 7.68

4 4 Axle Wheat Sadul Jesalmer 2890 57 4110 81 8250 6680 162 3.04VDF 5.97

AXLE LOAD SURVEY

5

Annexure: Sheet 1 of 2

2 Axle 3 Axle M Axle

0.97 0.97 0.81 4.50 4.50 4.50

2013 2014 23 143 68 23 110 99 345112

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2014 2015 24 150 71 24 116 104 362368 1

LCV 5.00 2015 2016 25 158 75 25 122 109 380486 2

2 axle 5.00 2016 2017 27 166 79 26 128 115 399511 0.40 1 3

>2 axle 5.00 2017 2018 28 174 83 27 134 121 419486 0.82 2 4

2018 2019 29 183 87 29 141 127 440460 1.26 3 5

2019 2020 31 192 91 30 148 133 462483 1.72 4 6

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2020 2021 32 202 96 32 155 140 485608 2.21 5 7

LCV 5.00 2021 2022 34 212 100 33 163 147 509888 2.72 6 8

2 axle 5.00 2022 2023 36 222 106 35 171 154 535382 3.25 7 9

>2 axle 5.00 2023 2024 38 233 111 37 180 162 562152 3.81 8 10

2024 2025 39 245 116 39 188 170 590259 4.41 9 11

2025 2026 41 257 122 41 198 178 619772 5.03 10 12

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2026 2027 44 270 128 43 208 187 650761 5.68 11 13

LCV 5.00 2027 2028 46 284 135 45 218 196 683299 6.36 12 14

2 axle 5.00 2028 2029 48 298 141 47 229 206 717464 7.08 13 15

>2 axle 5.00 2029 2030 50 313 148 49 241 217 753337 7.83 14 16

2030 2031 53 328 156 52 253 227 791004 8.62 15 17

2031 2032 56 345 164 54 265 239 830554 9.45 16 18

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2032 2033 58 362 172 57 278 251 872082 10.32 17 19

LCV 5.00 2033 2034 61 380 180 60 292 263 915686 11.24 18 20

2 axle 5.00 2034 2035 64 399 190 63 307 276 961470 12.20 19 21

>2 axle 5.00 2035 2036 68 419 199 66 322 290 1009543 13.21 20 22

2036 2037 71 440 209 69 339 305 1060021 14.27 21 23

2037 2038 74 462 219 73 355 320 1113022 15.38 22 24

2038 2039 78 485 230 77 373 336 1168673 16.55 23 25

2039 2040 82 509 242 80 392 353 1227106 17.78 24 26

2040 2041 86 535 254 84 411 370 1288462 19.07 25 27

2041 2042 90 561 267 89 432 389 1352885 20.42 26 28

2042 2043 95 590 280 93 454 408 1420529 21.84 27 29

From 2015 to 2020

From 2020 to 2025

From 2025 Onwards

Calculation for MSA

Direction:-

Location : KM 8+000

Growth Rate %VDF

Mini

BusBus LCV

Truck Standard

Axles in

the YearMSA

Year Projected Traffic

Up to 2015

Annexure: Sheet 1 of 2

2 Axle 3 Axle M Axle

0.97 0.97 0.81 4.50 4.50 4.50

2013 2014 22 155 95 49 148 106 441468

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2014 2015 24 162 99 52 155 111 463542 1

LCV 5.00 2015 2016 25 171 104 54 163 117 486719 2

2 axle 5.00 2016 2017 26 179 110 57 171 123 511055 0.51 1 3

>2 axle 5.00 2017 2018 27 188 115 60 180 129 536607 1.05 2 4

2018 2019 29 197 121 63 189 135 563438 1.61 3 5

2019 2020 30 207 127 66 198 142 591610 2.20 4 6

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2020 2021 32 218 133 69 208 149 621190 2.82 5 7

LCV 5.00 2021 2022 33 229 140 73 219 157 652250 3.48 6 8

2 axle 5.00 2022 2023 35 240 147 76 230 164 684862 4.16 7 9

>2 axle 5.00 2023 2024 37 252 154 80 241 173 719105 4.88 8 10

2024 2025 38 265 162 84 253 181 755061 5.64 9 11

2025 2026 40 278 170 88 266 190 792814 6.43 10 12

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2026 2027 42 292 178 93 279 200 832454 7.26 11 13

LCV 5.00 2027 2028 44 306 187 97 293 210 874077 8.13 12 14

2 axle 5.00 2028 2029 47 322 197 102 308 220 917781 9.05 13 15

>2 axle 5.00 2029 2030 49 338 207 107 323 231 963670 10.02 14 16

2030 2031 52 355 217 113 339 243 1011853 11.03 15 17

2031 2032 54 372 228 118 356 255 1062446 12.09 16 18

Mini/Std.

Bus5.00 2032 2033 57 391 239 124 374 268 1115568 13.21 17 19

LCV 5.00 2033 2034 60 410 251 131 393 281 1171347 14.38 18 20

2 axle 5.00 2034 2035 63 431 264 137 412 295 1229914 15.61 19 21

>2 axle 5.00 2035 2036 66 453 277 144 433 310 1291410 16.90 20 22

2036 2037 69 475 291 151 454 325 1355980 18.25 21 23

2037 2038 72 499 305 159 477 342 1423779 19.68 22 24

2038 2039 76 524 320 167 501 359 1494968 21.17 23 25

2039 2040 80 550 336 175 526 377 1569717 22.74 24 26

2040 2041 84 578 353 184 552 395 1648202 24.39 25 27

2041 2042 88 606 371 193 580 415 1730613 26.12 26 28

2042 2043 92 637 389 203 609 436 1817143 27.94 27 29

From 2015 to 2020

From 2020 to 2025

From 2025 Onwards

Calculation for MSA

Direction:-

Location : KM 28+300

Growth Rate %VDF

Mini

BusBus LCV

Truck Standard

Axles in

the YearMSA

Year Projected Traffic

Up to 2015

S.No. Bill No. Description Amount Percentage (%)


2


2,60,98,176

5.8%

3 Bill No 3 GRANULAR SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSES 3,49,70,320 7.8%


5 Bill No 5 CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS (CULVERTS) 83,00,700 1.9%

6Bill No 6 STRUCTURAL WORKS (BRIDGES , UNDERPASSES, FLY OVERS &

INTERCHANGE)

1,21,55,0402.7%

7Bill No 7

TRAFFIC SIGNAGES, ROAD MARKINGS & OTHER

APPURTENANCES

4,40,81,6919.8%

8Bill No 8 DRAINAGE, PROTECTION WORKS & RETAINING WALLS

3,21,75,0007.2%

9 Bill No 9 HIGHWAY LIGHTING 86,52,000 1.9%

10 Bill No 10 TOLL PLAZA 2,25,00,000 5.0%

11 Bill No 11 JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT, BUS SHELTERS 2,62,66,934 5.9%



ABSTRACT OF COST : HANUMANGARH-ABOHAR (SH-7A) (Project Length : 43 Kms)

SL. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY Rate Amount

Bill no 1. Site Clearance and Dismantling

1.01 Cutting of trees including cutting of trunks, branches and removal of stumps including

stacking of serviceable material within a lead of 1000 meters with all lift and earth

filling to required compaction in the depression/pit as per MoRTH Specification :

Clause 201

Stump removal by mechanical means

1.01a Girth above 300mm & upto 600 mm Each 37 115 4,255

1.01b Girth above 600mm & upto 900 mm Each 90 200 18,000

1.01c Girth above 900mm & upto 1800 mm Each 71 500 35,500

1.01d Girth above 1800mm Each 109 1000 1,09,000

1.02 Clearing and grubbing road land including uprooting rank vegetation, grass, bush,

shrubs, saplings and trees of girth upto 300mm, removal of stumps, disposal of

unserviceable material and stacking of serviceable material upto 1000 m from road

boundry as per MoRTH Specification : 201

Hectare 1 30000 30,000

1.03 Dismantling of flexible pavements and disposal of dismantled materials upto a lead of

1000 metres, scaking serviceable and unserviceable materials separately as per MoRTH

specification claue : 202

1.03a (a) Bituminous Cum 1423 316 4,49,668

1.03b (b) Granular courses Cum 1423 230 3,27,290

1.04 S & F in position precast R.C.C. stone (M-15 mix) of standard IRC design including

finishing in cement sand mortar 1:3, painting with enamel paint, printing letters and

numerals etc. complete (MoRTH specifications clause : 800)

1.04a 5th KM stone Each 8 2500 20,000

1.04b Ordinary KM Stone Each 35 1500 52,500

1.04c Hectometre Stone Each 172 400 68,800

1.05 Sign Boards Each 40 532 21,280

Total for Bill 1 = 11,36,293

Bill of Quantity


Bill of Quantity

Bill no 2. Earthworks

2.01 Earth work in excavation including stacking/ disposal of surplus earth with all lifts

and lead upto 1000 meters exclusive of compensation of earth (MoRTH specification

Clause 301 to 305).

Cum 108615 40 43,44,600

2.02 Earth filling with surplus soil excavated from foundation and taken only from outside

of building plinth in 15cm compacted layers, including ramming watering and

consolidation, lead upto 30 metres [MoRTH Specification : Clause 301,304].

Cum 17367 75 13,02,525

2.03 Compaction of original ground with maximum of six passes of 8-10 tonnes power roller

including filling depression occurring during rolling [MoRTH Specification : Clause

305.3.4]. Compensation for earth, taken from private land with all lead and lift (Land to

be arranged by private negotiations by the contractor) [MoRTH Specification : Clause

301to 305] with lead upto 5 Km.

Cum 26842 348 93,41,016

2.04 Removal of unservicable soil, blown sand including excavation, loading and disposal

upto 10 km lead.

Cum 64406 173 1,11,10,035

Total for Bill 2 = 2,60,98,176


Bill of Quantity

Bill no 3. Granular Sub-base and Base Courses

3.00 Only Loosening & Recompacting of Existing GSB layer (upto 200mm) in partially

reconstruction & reconstruction section

Cum 6940 700 48,58,000

3.01 Providing, laying, spreading and compacting specified graded sand, gravel as per

Table 400-1,400-2 or any other coarse material as per design mix, as per CBR in sub

base course including premixing the material at OMC in mechanical mixer(Pug mill),

carriage of mixed material spreading in uniform layers with motor grader, F.E loader

on a prepared base and compacting with vibratory roller to achieve desired density (as

per I.S.2720) including all material, labour, machinery, lighting, guarding, barricading

and maintenance of diversion complete.[MoRTH specification : Clause 401] by

mechanical means with lead upto 10 km.

Cum 32704 700 2,28,92,800

3.02 Providing, laying, spreading and compacting crushed graded stone aggregate of as

per table 400-10 and 400-11 to Wet Mix Macadam specification including premixing

the material with water to OMC in mechnical mixer as per approved design mix,

carriage of mixed material by Tipper to site, laying in uniform layers with motor

grader/F.E. Loader/paver finisher in sub base / base course on a well prepared

under base and compacting with vibratory roller to achieve the desired density

including lighting, guarding, barricading and maintance of diversion etc. (MoRTH

specification : Clause 406) by mechanical means with lead up to 10 km.

Cum 4688 1540 72,19,520



Bill of Quantity

Bill no 4. Bituminous and Rigid Works

4.01 Providing and applying primer coat over prepared surface or granular base with

bitumen emulsion as per IS: 8887 & manufacturer’s specifications @ 6 kg /10 sqm with

a self propelled or towed bitumen pressure sprayer equipped for spraying the material

uniformly at specified rates and temperatures including cleaning of road surface as per

MoRTH specification CIause- 502,112

Sqm 17500 39 6,82,500

4.02 Providing and applying tack coat with bitumen emulsion on the prepared surface

including cleaning as per IS : 8887 & manufacturer’s specifications @ 2 kg /10sqm with


uniformly at specified rates and temperatures as per MoRTH specification CI.503,112

Sqm 17500 10 1,66,250

4.03 Providing and applying tack coat with bitumen emulsion on the prepared surface

including cleaning as per IS : 8887 & manufacturer’s specifications @ 2 kg /10sqm with


uniformly at specified rates and temperatures as per MoRTH specification CI.503,112

Sqm 485870 10 46,15,765

4.04 Providing and laying Dense Bituminous Macadam on prepared surface with specified

graded crushed aggregates as per table 510 and design mix for base/binder course

including loading of material with F.E loader, heating of binder (including cost of

antistripping compound wherever required) aggregate and filler in hot mix plant 40-60

TPH transporting the mixed material by tippers and laying with sensor paver finisher

as per clause 507.3.5 to the required level and grade, rolling by self propelled power

rollers and vibratory rollers or pneumatic tyred roller 150-250KN. TP=0.7MPa to

achieve the desired density (approved by the department) but excluding cost of

primer/tack coat. [MoRTH Specification : Clause 507,112] with 4.50 % Bitumen, with 10

Km lead

Cum 18595 6982 12,98,30,290


Bill of Quantity

4.05 Providing and laying bituminous concrete as per design mix on prepared surface

with specified graded stone as per table 500 - 18 for wearing course including loading

of aggregate with F.E. Loader and hot mixing of binder (including cost of anti-stripping

compound, wherever required) and 3% cement filler with aggregates in hot mix plant

40-60 TPH Transporting the mix material with tipper to paver and laying with sensor

paver finisher (as per clause 507.3.5) to the required level, grades and rolling with

vibratory compactor and pneumatic tyred roller 150 - 250 KN, TP = 0.7 MPa, to

achieve the desired density (approved by the department) excluding cost of

primer/tack coat (MoRTH Specification : Clause -509,112). 50 - 65 mm compacted

thicknesswith 5.5% binder grading-1 with lead of mix material 10Km

Cum 10837 7323 7,93,59,351

4.06 Construction of dry lean cement concrete sub- base over a prepared sub - grade with

coarse and fine aggregate conforming to IS : 383, the size of coarse aggregate not

exceeding 25 mm, aggregate cement ratio not to exceed 15 : 1, aggregate gradation after

blending to be as per Table 600 -1, cement content not to be less than 150 Kg/Cum,

optimum moisture content to be determined during trial length construction, concrete

strength not to be less than 10 Mpa at 7 days, mixed in a batching plant as per mix

design, transported to site, laid with a hydrostatic paver with electronic sensor,

compacting with 8 -10 tonne vibratory roller, finishing and curing complete as per

MoRTH specification clause 601.

Cum 1425 2129 30,33,825

4.07 Construction of un-reinforced, dowel jointed, plain cement concrete pavement over a

prepared sub-base with 43 grade cement @ 400 Kg per cum, coarse and fine aggregate

conforming to IS: 383, maximum size of coarse aggregate not exceeding 25 mm, mixed

in a batching and mixing plant as per approved mix design, transported to site, laid

with a fixed form or slip form paver, spread, compacted and finished in a continuous

operation including provision of contraction, expansion, construction and longitudinal

joints, joint filler, separation membrance, sealant primer, joint sealant, debonding strip,

dowel bar, tie rod, admixtures as approved, curing compound, finishing to lines and

grades as per drawing complete as per MoRTH specification clause 602.

Cum 2850 4800 1,36,80,000

Total for Bill 4 = 23,13,67,981


Bill of Quantity

Bill no 5. Cross Drainage Works

5.01 Providing, laying & fixing for widening of Existing Culvert including excation, PCC,

RCC, reinforcement and shuttering complete works as per MORTH specification clause

301, 305, 1500, 1700 & 2100

Sqm 90 49680 44,71,200

5.02 Providing, laying & fixing in position RCC spun or hume pipes ISI marked with proper

jointing in required slope packed in the gasket of hume or spun yarn and neatly

finished with rich grout of cement moratar 1:3 or having flexible rubber ring joint made

with prefectly air and water tight including testing of joints as per MoRTH Specfication

: Clause : 1000 & 2900 with NP-4, 1200mm dia pipe.

LM 148 25875 38,29,500

Total for Bill 5 = 83,00,700Bill no 6. Structural Works

6.01 Major Bridge Sqm 0 51750 0

6.01 Providing, laying & fixing for widening of Existing minor bridge including excation,

PCC, RCC, reinforcement and shuttering complete works as per MORTH specification

clause 301, 305, 1500, 1700 & 2100

Sqm 235 51750 1,21,55,040



Bill of Quantity

Bill no 7. Traffic Signages, Road Marking and other Appurtenances

7.01 Traffic Signages & other appurtennaces; Providing and fixing of retro-

reflectorised cautionary, mandatory and informatory sign as per IRC :67 made of high

intensity grade sheeting vide clause 801.3, fixed over aluminium sheeting, 1.5 mm thick

supported on a mild steel angle iron post 75 mm x 75 mm x 6 mm firmly fixed to the

ground by means of properly designed foundation with M15 grade cement concrete 45

cm x 45 cm x 60 cm, 60 cm below ground level as per approved drawing all complete as

per IRC-67, MORTH specifications and as directed by the Engineer-in-charge.

Lumpsum 34705197 3,47,05,197

90 cm equilateral triangle Each

60 cm circular Each

80 mm x 60 mm rectangular Each

90 cm high octagon Each

2500 x 2100 mm Each

90 cm circular Each

Route Marker Each

2000 x 1250 mm Each

1000 x 800 mm Each

1600 x 1250 mm Each

Object Marker Each

Two Way Hazard Marker Each

Chevron Sign Each

Overhead Sign at TOLL Road Start 4000 x 2100mm Each

Overhead Sign at TOLL Road End 4000 x 2100mm Each

Overhead Sign at TOLL plaza 1km 4000 x 2100mm Each

Overhead Sign at TOLL plaza 500m 4000 x 2100mm Each

Side Mounted Toll Plaza 3200 x 1700mm Each



Side Mounted (pictorial rate sign) 2150 x 2780mm Each

Side Mounted at Toll Booth 800 x 800mm Each


Bill of Quantity

7.02 Providing and laying of hot applied thermo plastic compound inclusive of type-1

reflectorising glass beads as per table 800.3, 800.4 applied in uniform thickness of at

least 2.5 mm and spread uniformlywith reflectorising glass beads type-2 in addition @

250 gm/scm with a road marking machine as per IRC : 35 complete with traffic

diversion arrangement as per MoRTH specification clause 803.4.

Sqm 14541 627 91,17,144

7.03 Providing and fixing of Solar Studs installed in concrete or asphaltic surface by drilling

hole and bedded in a suitable bituminous grout or epoxy mortar, all as per BS 873 part

4:1973

Nos. 399 650 2,59,350



Bill of Quantity

Bill no 8. Drainage, Protection Works & Retaing Walls

8.01 Providing, laying & fixing for RCC covered drain including excation, PCC, RCC,

reinforcement and shuttering complete works as per MORTH specification clause 301,

305, 1500, 1700 & 2100

RM 3900 8250 3,21,75,000

Total for Bill 8 = 3,21,75,000Bill No 9. HIGHWAY LIGHTING

9.01 Providing and fixting icluding instalation of all electrical System for Highway Lighting

work complete as per technical specification and as directed by engineer in charge

Per Km. 1.20 7210000 86,52,000

i) Highmast

ii) Pole one Arm

iii) Pole Two Arm

iv) Lighting under Structure

v) Electrical Connections (Transformer,Cabling etc) from Electrical Department to

Ligthing Area

vi) Backup Genertor for Street Light

150mm dia HDPE pipe in Island for electrical works

Total for Bill 9 = 86,52,000Bill No 10. Toll Plaza

10.01 Proposed and fixing Toll Plaza including all related items, Adminstrative building, toll

tunnel etc complete as per technical specification and latest IRC SP-73 and as directed

by engineer incharge.

Nos. 1 22500000 2,25,00,000

Total for Bill 10 = 2,25,00,000


Bill of Quantity

Bill No 11. JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT, BUS BAYS & BUS SHELTERS

11.01 Proposed Bus Bay as per IRC norms Nos. 0 3000000 0

11.02 Providing and constructing Bus Shelters in the required locations as per detailed

drawing and as directed by the Engineer in charge. (Prior approval of the detailed

drawing has to be taken by the contractor) all complete as per Technical specifications

and as directed by the Engineer-in-charge.

Nos. 7 200000 14,00,000

11.03 Development of Junction including providing, laying and fixing complete all raltive

items as per MORTH specification and as directed by engineer in charge.

Nos. 19 1308786 2,48,66,934

Total for Bill 11 = 2,62,66,934

44,77,04,135

Annexure – 8.1

MoEF Notification on 3rd November 2009

sonia

Rectangle

sonia

Rectangle

sonia

Rectangle

SoniA

Stamp

Final Feasibility Report of Hanumangarh

Documents

Transcript of Final Feasibility Report of Hanumangarh