FES Spasov Publikacija
-
Upload
aleksandar-petrovski -
Category
Documents
-
view
252 -
download
0
Transcript of FES Spasov Publikacija
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
1/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
2/124
, 2011
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
3/124
:--
-
:
:
:
:
, :
: 300
, .
.
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
4/124
,
. - . -
,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
5/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
6/124
,
!
, ...!
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
7/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
8/124
9
............................................................................................................................... 11 ...................................................................................................................................................... 13
I. .. 151. ................................................................................................................................................ 152. . 24
II. - . 311. ........................................................................................................................... 312. .. 33
2.1 ................................................................... 332.2 ................................................................................................................ 362.3 - .................................................................................................. 37
3. ........................................................................................................ 403.1 ................................................................................................................................ 403.2 ................................................................................................................. 41
4. a .................................................................................................................................. 434.1 Christendom 434.2
...................................................................................................... 46
4.3 . ............ 484.4 (, , , ) 514.5 () . 534.6 1648 . .. 56
III. ......................................................................................... 611. ........................................................................................................................ 61
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
9/124
10
2. . 642.1 ........................................................................... 652.2 ........................................................................ 77
3. ........................................................... 863.1 ................................................................................ 863.2 ........................................................................ 873.3 , 903.4 ......................................................................................... 953.5 . 96
IV. ........................................................................................... 1011.
() 1012. - ? 106
V. ..................................................................................................................................................... 111
VI. ............................................................................................................................. 115
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
10/124
11
, , . , , , . -, . -. -, , . , , .-, -, -, .
- , , -, , -. , , .
-, ,, -, , .
2006 . , , , , .
, , , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
11/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
12/124
13
, , : , , 2010 ., , : . -, , . -. -. , , , , .
, , , . ,
, , , . ,, , , .
, ,
, , , , . , . . , .
, , , . ,
, , 19 . , . , , . , , . , . ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
13/124
14
, .
, , ,
, . , , , , , . -. .
, , . , . , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
14/124
15
I. 1.
, ,, () .
. , , , , . ,
, , :.
, (Hinsli, 2001:32). ( . ), , , , , , ( -1, ).
, , , .
, () , ,, .
, , , , , , . ,
. , , , , , , .
, (, ), , -
1/NGO -/Non-Governmental Organization
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
15/124
16
. , , .
,
(Habermas, 2008:38). , , , :, , , , , , .
, , , . . , , , , 18 .
, , , .
, . ,, . souvereniteit in eigen sfeer ( ) -. (Johan Althusius) 16 17 , (Guillaumme Groen van Princterer) 1852 ., (imonovi, 2005:17). , . ( ), , 17 19 . ,
, .
() , , ,, , () . . , ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
16/124
17
, , , . , , , , , , (imonovi, 2005:17).
, , . , , , -, (Fukujama, 2007:109-110). , , , : ,, . , , , . , .
1986 . (Ulrich Beck)2 , . , , . , ,, , , , , , (, 2008:29). , , ,
(Grande, 2002). , . , e conditio sine qua non , .
2(Ulrich Beck), 1944 ., (London School of Economics and Politics).
- 1986 ., , , . , , , (nthony Giddens), (David Held), (Saskia Sassen), (Edgar Grande) . : , , , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
17/124
18
, , , .
. , , . , ?
, , ( ), . , , .
. ( ), , (/Hegel). , - , ( /Hobs, /Locke,/Holbach, /Rousseau),
, (Hans Kelsen). , , , , . (, ) , , .
(Karl Marx) (Friedrich Engels) (. ,1999:77-89).
, , (Hinsli, 2001:23). .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
18/124
19
, , , . , . , , , . ... (Hinsli, 2001:19). ,, . , , (Hinsli, 2001:19)3.
, , (18-19 ) - (), (19-20 )
(Habermas, 2008:37). , 18 , , , , , ( ). . , ., , , (
, 16 -), . , ,
3, , , , . ., , , .
, , , , . , , , , , , . , . , , , . , . , , , , (Hinsli, 1999:22-5).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
19/124
20
, , , , 4.
(Christendom) , ,
, . , , , , , . , 1648 ., , .., , () , , (ius ad bellum), (raison detat). 158 . , 1806 ., ,
, II, , , . , , , , , . , () , (, 2001:8).
, . , (.,
), (, ., ). , ,. , , . ( ), , ( ): ... , , , ... . , ,
, . ... , (, 2001:13-14). , ,, ,
4 17 , ., XIV.
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
20/124
21
, , , , , , . , (Habermas,2008:38-9).5
.
- . , , , , , (, , , , ). ,, , , , , , , .
.
, , , , , : , , , , , (, 1999:67).
, , , , : , , , , . , .. , , - , : , , , , (., 2009:115).
5 - , , , (, 2001:5)., 20 ( , , ), , , ,, , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
21/124
22
, , , , , , .,, , .
, . ( , ), , , , (Hinsli, 2001:19).
(Cirn, 2003) e , . , , , , , , , . 20, (Leon Duguit) , , . ( imperium) : , , ,, (, 1997:10).
, (), . 1789 . , (, imperium,autorite publique, Herrschergewalt). , , .
, , , , . ,
, , () , , . , ... , ,, . (, 1997:12). , ( ) . , , , , ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
22/124
23
(, 1997:14)., 20 , ( ), ( ), ( ), :governance government (, : , ). , , () (Cirn, 2003:8). ,, ,policy, ... (Colebatsch, 2008:4).
, , policy ( , , ,
), (state of welfare). - . , , , , . , , , 20 , .. ,
. 20 (1989-1991 .),
(), .
, , , , , . . (
). , ( ), . , . , , ( ), , , , , , , (. Cirn, 2003:10-15).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
23/124
24
, , , , , , ,, . ? ! , , . , , (, 1997:9).
., , . 20 , . , , . (), . , ,
, , . , () , , .
(-), , . , , , . , (, 1999:53). ,
, .
2.
. , , , . , : , , ,, , , , ( , , ). ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
24/124
25
(Held, 2002:2). (, ,), . , (Hinsli, 2001: 36), , , , ().
. , .. ( ), , , () . , (
), , , (), ; ... (Held, 2002:3).
, ,, , . , ,, . , () ,
. , ( ), , . , ( ) , , . , , , , . , (),
() , , . , .
, , ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
25/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
26/124
27
, . , , de facto, , , , , , . (Beck, 2004:77)
, , . , , , 1648 ., .
, , , . , , , , .
, . , , . (Ajvaz, 2008:41), .
, .
, .
, , , , , , ,, , , , , , , governance, government,
deus ex machina (Beck, 2004:78-79).
, , : ?
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
27/124
28
, , , .
- ( ) , . , . , , . , !
- , , , , . , . , , , . , , .
, . .
, (XVIII-XIX ), .6 , . . , , , , , . , ,
6. . , , . . ( ) : (Beck, 2004: 64).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
28/124
29
/ (Held, 2002:24).
() . , , .
, . , ( , ) . . , , ,
() .: , , , , 7 (Beck, 2004:81).
, . .-. , ,
. . , , , , -, (, 1999:61).
, , . , .
, , . , . , , , .
7.
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
29/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
30/124
31
II.
1. .
, () , , . , , ,
. , .
, ,. , , , . , , . , .
, , . , , , .
, . (Hinsli, 2001) (Grande and Pauly, 2005:9).
, ( ) . ,, , , , 18 19 , . ,, , , . ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
31/124
32
, , , , . , , . , , .
, , , .
, (), , , , , (Grande and Pauly, 2005:9, Krasner, 1999).
, o - . , , .
: ( ) ( ) (16), (
) 16 1648 ., , . ( ) ( ), .
, . , , , ,
.8
8 (Kurtulus, 2004 .; Minkkinen, 2007 .; Hayman and Williams, 2006 .; Nagan andHammer, 2003 .) , ( , 1576 .) (1648 .) . , 16 . , () :
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
32/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
33/124
34
, , . , , , ,
. , .
, , . , : , (), () : , (Hinsli, 2001:37-38). , (, , ) (, ). , , , ,
.,
(zoon politikon), (, 1999:78). (Hinsli, 2001:38). ,, () . , . , , , , - . ,
. , , , -, , , , , , , , . , , , 10 (Hinsli, 2001:38-39).
, , , . , , (), . ,
10, , () , . () (Hinsli, 2001:39).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
34/124
35
. , () . , , . , , (,
, , ) (Hinsli, 2001:39-40). , , (, 1995:157).
, , . , :, , , , , , , , , ; ,
.
, , , . (, 2006:116-117).11, ,, -, ()? , , !
, , . , , . , III (, ).
, . 330 . .., ,
. , ., , ,12
11 2003 ., (, 2003:43).12, , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
35/124
36
, , (Hinsli, 2001: 41).
323 . . .. , ,
, . , , , , , .
, , .
2.2 , , ,
. , , ., , , , . , , , , ,
(Hinsli, 2001:43). , , , , .
, , , , . , . , , , , . ,
.
, (Hinsli, 2001:45). , , , , ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
36/124
37
. , , , . , , , .
2.3 ,
. , imperium . , , (),
(11-16 ) .
, . 5 . , 13 , 27 . . .. , , , , . , (Augustus), (, 1995: 378).
, , , , princeps civitatis ( ), , . , , , , . , , , . , , populus romanum (), . , . , , , , .Imperium , . (Hinsli, 2001:46-47)
1 . .., (, ) (,1995:300-302) , . , , , , . 23 . . .. imperium maius
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
37/124
38
(, , , ). , tribunicia potestas, (auctoritas). , (imperium) (tribuniciapotestas) . princeps, 29-28
. . .., (, 1995:379). , .
(69-76 .). , (lex de imperio Vespasiani), , , (, 1995:451). imperium proconsulare, , ,
(Hinsli, 2001:49). , , , ( ), , , .
. , . , , . , , , , ,
, (Tacit, Ann. III: 55 , 1995:451). , , (, , : civis romanus sum).
212 . ConstitutioAntoniniana, , , (, 1995:532). , , , 13. , . , , . , .
13, , . , 1995:532 .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
38/124
39
imperium populi romani, imperium Romanum orbis Romanum (Hinsli, 2001:50).
3 , (Ulpian),
: Princeps legibus solutus est (, ), : Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem (). , / (, princeps civitatis, ., . .) (, ., . .) , (Hinsli,2001:51).
, ,. , , , ( , ),
, . , , (, -, ), , , , , . ( , ), , , , , , ., , , (Hinsli, 2001:52).
lex regia ( , , ., . .), , , . , , lex regia . , , (,1995:175).
(), lex regia, Corpus iuris civilis: Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem;utpote cum lege regia quae de imperio eius lata est, populus ei in eum omne sum imperium et potestatem conferat
(, lex regia, imperium, ) (. Hinsli, 2001:53).
, . (Rex Dei Gratia - ).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
39/124
40
. Corpus iuris civilis , (, 1993:95).
3. 3.1
, . , . ,
(, 1993:48).
: , , , -. . , ( 4 ) (). , ( - ), () ( , ). , , , , , , .
( , , ). , imperium populi romani (
) . , , , , , (, 1993:51). , , , . , , (Hinsli, 2001:56). ,. ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
40/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
41/124
42
, . , , . ,
, . , , , , (, ).
, , , , , . , (Hinsli, 2001:59).
,
. , , . , , . , , , . 1519 .. , , , . , , , .
, . . 14 14. , . , , (), . () , ... (Hinsli, 2001:61).
17
. 20 21 (, ) ,
14 (Ibn Khaldun) 1332 ., 1406 . . : , , , . (Wikipedia, 05.08.2009 .).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
42/124
43
, ( 20 , , ).
1979 ., , ,
. , . . , , ( , , : ,, .) . . , , , , , . , , ,
.,
, . , , , ,, . , failed states ().
, .
4. a
4.1 Christendom (476 .), ,,
. , - , , . , 8-9 (), .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
43/124
44
, , , , , , . , ,
. , .- . , , , , . ,: , , , , , , . , ,
, , , , , (, 1995:212). , , - , , . .
, , , ( ), ( 4.2).
. . , , , , - pontifex maximus (), , , ,
, , , Christendom15
.
15 Christendom , ,., . .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
44/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
45/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
46/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
47/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
48/124
49
, ,, . () : . , ,
, , , . , , .
, . (, )19.
. ,. ,
, . , , . () . (ius gentium), . , . , (. , 13.1), , o (Bigongiari, 1990:16-17). , , ( ), .
, , . , , , ., , , , (Akvinski, 1990).
, , , , (Bigongiari, 1990; Hinsli, 2001:101).
19 . , , . , , 10 , , . , ,.
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
49/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
50/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
51/124
52
, lex regia , , .. , (),
, , , ., ,
, . , (a sola concordatia et concencu subiectivo), (Tadi, 1983:63).
, , (),. . (),
(potestas absoluta). , , (ecclesia universalis), ( plenitudo potestas) (Fenske undand., 2004:224-225). , , , , , .
. (), () . , , . . , ( ), , . (), 1648 . , .
, , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
52/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
53/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
54/124
55
, : (), () , () (Lalovi, 2002:231-233).,
, droit gouvernement (). , , . . (; ),, , , .
? , (Macchiaveli), , . , , ( , , ), , , , raison detre, , , . , . , . , , , , , (Bodin, 2002).
. , , , , . , . , , , . , (Bodin, 2002).
, , , , , , , : , , . , , , , , , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
55/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
56/124
57
1555 . cuius regio, eius religio (, ). () . ,
, . 17 , . , , 1648 .
, , ?
ex nihilio. , , , . , ,
( ), , , . , . , , , 1806 ., , , (Stanford Enc., 2003:5-6).
, . , , , 130 . () , . 20 ,
, ..
. , (, , , .). . , . (Weber, 1968)., , (-).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
57/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
58/124
59
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
59/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
60/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
61/124
62
, .21, , , ( 19 , ) . , ,
. (Jessop, 2003:30) . , , , - (-) , , , .
, () .
, 18 , , ( -) , (Khan, 1992:197) . (19 , ), , , ( Rechtsstaat).
,
() .
, (Bull, 1977), , , 19
21, - () , . ,
( ., ); , ( .,), (); (). (), (), , (), , .., () (Jessop, 2003:31). , , 2001 .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
62/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
63/124
64
20 , , (1914-1918), , , - (1939-1945) ( , 20 ),
, .
,, , , . , () . ().( ) , ().
( ), ( : , ,, ).
2. .
, (Carl Schmitt), (Schmitt, 1933) 20 ( 20 ). ( ) , ., , 21 .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
64/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
65/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
66/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
67/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
68/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
69/124
70
, , , , : (Rousseau, 1918:45). , ,
, (Rousseau, 1918:46-47). , ,
? , ,, () (persona civitatis) . (,) , (Rousseau, 1918:54). , , , , .
, , , , ,. (Rousseau, 1918:54-55).
, , , . , , , (Hinsli, 2001:155).
, , (, ) , () , , . , , , , , (Hinsli, 2001:156). , , . ,
() . (volonte generale, , , volonte de tous, ) persona civitatis . , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
70/124
71
, , . , , ,. () , .
, . , (Rousseau, 1918:55)., , , , (Rousseau, 1918:57). . , , .
,
1789 ., 20 19 , , ().
, (Immanuel Kant) - ( ., ), ( ), . , , :
, , . , , . , , (Cvetianin, 2008:350-351), (, 2004) . , ( ), . , , , . ,, , , , (Cvetianin, 2008:351). , , , , . , , . , , , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
71/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
72/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
73/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
74/124
75
, - bellum omnium contra omnes, (Cvetianin, 2008:215-216).
, . , , (Schmitt,1933:11). , (Ausnahmezustand) , , . , . , . , , - . , , , , .
(Schmitt, 1933:11).
, , . , , , (,-, -), (), -. 1933 ., ,
(Schmitt, 1933:6). ,
, , in Volk, ein Reich, ein Fhrer, , Fhrersprinzip.
(Hans Kelsen), 20 . () , , , , . , , . , , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
75/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
76/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
77/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
78/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
79/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
80/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
81/124
82
, .
, 18 19 . , . . 18 . , , , . , () ,
. 17 , 1648 . , , . , , , . , (Hinsli,2001:195-197).
. , 18 (, - ) , , . ., () , . . , ,, , . 18 , . , , 19 . , 17 18 ,
. , , . , - , , -, --, , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
82/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
83/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
84/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
85/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
86/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
87/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
88/124
89
1994 ., (. 955 1994 .), . 1 1994, 31 1994(ratione temporis),
(ratione materiae), , (ratione personae), , () , , (ratione loci)( , http://www.ictr.org/default.htm, 30.03.2010 .). , , , , -.
(
, : - , 28), , , , . - ( , , , ). -, , 29.
, - , - . ? () 1992-2000 ., ,
28 muro di gomma , , , .
, (, 2008).29 , 2007 ., 1991 . 2001 . ( http://www.pravo.org.mk/documentDetail.php?id=737, 30.03.2010 .).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
89/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
90/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
91/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
92/124
93
, 30. , 1992 . : , , , , ,
(. 1 ...)( Declaration on the Rights of Persons belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and LingusticsMinorities, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/minorities.htm, 31.03.2010 .).
, ( Framework Convention for the Protection ofNationalMinorities, http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=157&CL=ENG, EuropeanCharter for Regional or Minority Languages, http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/HTML/148.htm, 31.03.2010 .).
(), .
, , , . ,., , , , . , .
, , - , , . , - , (Held, 2002:11-12).
30
, , . , , . . . , , , ( ), (. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=157&CM=8&DF=31/03/2010&CL=ENG, 31.03.2010 .).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
93/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
94/124
95
3.4
. , , ,
, .
. ( ,: , , ), 20 ( 6 ) , . , , , , , , .
, .. , . , , - . .
, , ,, , , ., , , 1986 ., . , , . , . (), . , .
- 20 . 20
, (, ) (Melkas, 2002:118). -, : , 1972 . () , , 1992 . , 1997 .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
95/124
96
. , , , ,, (Melkas, 2002:119).
,
. , , 2009 ., . , , 73 CO2, (: BBCNews, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8571347.stm, 31.03.2010 .).
, . , , .
3.5
, , , . , . , ( ), , ( ) () . , : , ,
, ., , ,
, . , , ., (NeilMacCormick) (Stephen Krasner), (18-19 ) ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
96/124
97
(), , , (, .) , . , , .
, , (, ) (Cirn, 2003 .). ( ), , .
, , . , () ,
, , . , , , ,. .
, , () ., , , (), 1989-1991 . , ,. (. ), . , .. , ( ) , . , , , , 1989 .,
(Gat, 2009). ,
, , (Held, 2002:21). ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
97/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
98/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
99/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
100/124
101
IV. 1.
()
, , . . 20 21 , ( , ), 20 . , (), (,), a, , ., .
, , . (Bagvati, 2008:15).
,. , , , , :, , , (, 2008:35).
20 - 19 . . , (Sasen, 2004:56). ,
. , : , , . ,, . , ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
101/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
102/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
103/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
104/124
105
, , . , ., . , . , , , , , (Cirn, 2003:236).
, ( ). , , . , : , , , ,
. , .
, , (). , , . , . , , , .
, , . 20 : , , .
, , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
105/124
106
2. - ? ,
, . ,
, , . : , . , .
. , (Realpolitik) a , , -. , , , , , ,
, . , . , , ( ) . , . , , , .
, , . . ( ), -- ( ) (Beck,Grande, 2006:26-27).
, , ( )., ,
, . , , , . , (Beck, Grande, 2006:27). , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
106/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
107/124
108
, . , , , (Beck, 2004:333). ( .,), .
, , , , . : , ; , ( ); , ; , ; , ; , () ,
(Held, 2002:24).
. , , , . , , . , .
. , , , /. , ,, , , (Held, 2002:28). , , , (, : ,, , ), .
, , , ,
. , . . , . , , ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
108/124
109
. , : (, ., ), (). , , (, ), . , (Beck, 1997: 221). , . , , , ,, .
, , . , , . ,
. , ,
, , . . . , . , . , ,
. , .
, , , , . ,
, . , , 2001., , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
109/124
110
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
110/124
111
V.
, ,
..
, . , , , , , .
, , . , , .
, , , , ,.
, . , , .
, , , ., - , , . , (, ,
) , , . , , , .
, , , .
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
111/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
112/124
113
, . : , , , (), () . (),. ( ) -, , - ( - - ),.
, , , .
, , , , , .
19 , , , ..
, .
. - 20 , , . . ,
: , , .
, () ,
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
113/124
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
114/124
115
VI.
The Responsibility to Protect (2001), eport of the International Commission on Intervention and StateSovereignty, co-chaired by Gareth Evans and Mohamed Sahnoun.Vol. I. Report of the International
Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, xiii+91 pp.Vol.II.Supplementary Volume: Research,Bibliography, Background, xiv+410 pp., : http://www.iciss.ca/pdf/Commission-Report.pdf
Ajvaz S.: Od Bodena, do savremenog koncpta suvereniteta, Godinjak Pravnog fakulteta u Sarajevu,LI:2008
Akvinski T.: Drava, Zagreb:1990 : , :2006 .: (), :1998 .: , , :1999 .: , :2000 .., ..: , :1998 Bagvati J.: U odbranu globalizacije, Beograd:2008 Beck U.: Mo protiv moi u doba globalizacije, Zagreb:2004 Beck U.: Was ist globalisierung? Frankfurt am Main:2007 Beck U., Grande E.: Kozmopolitska Europa: Drutvo i politika u drugoj Moderni, Zagreb:2006 Bigongiari D.: Politiki nazori Tome Akvinskog [:] Akvinski:1990 Bodin J.: est knjiga o republici (izbor), Zagreb:2002 Bogdandy A.von: Supranationale und Staatliche Herrschaft, 5-1997, : http://www.humboldt-forum-
recht.de/deutsch/5-1997/index.html
Bull H.: The Anarchical Society, London:1977 Bujger P.: Entgrenzung und Staatserosion als Problem der modernen Staatstheorie, Zeitschrift fr
ffentliches Recht, Band 55, Wien:2000
Cassese A.: Violence and Law in the Modern Age, Cambridge:1988 Cirn M.: Upravljanje sa one strane nacionalne drave, Beograd:2003 Colebatsch H., K.: Policy kao preispitivanje procesa vladavine, Politika misao, god. 45, broj 2:
Zagreb:2008
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
115/124
116
Crawford J., Marks S.: The Global Democracy Deficit:An Essay on International Law and its Limits,Archibugi et al.:1998
Cryer R.: International Criminal Law vs State Sovereignty:Another Round? European Journal ofInternational Law, Vol. 16, No.5:2005
Cvetianin N.: Epoha s one strane levice i desnice, Beograd:2008 Curtulus E.N.: Theories of Sovereignty:An Interdisciplinary Approach, Global Society, Vol. 18, No.4:2004 Delbrck J.: Staatliche Souverenitt und die neue Rolle des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten
Nationen,Verfassung und Recht in bersee-Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America,Mnchen:1993
Demmke C.: Die Europisierung der ffentlichen Dienste-zwischen nationaler Souverenitt undRechtsangleichung, ZTR, 1:2005
Deudney D., Ikenbery, J.G.: The Myth of the Autocratic Revival, Foreign Affaires, January/February:2009 .: , :1997 Erhardt C.A.: Europa zwischen nationaler Souverenitt und Integration, Aussen Politik, Stuttgart-
Hohenheim:1987
Fabio U.: Das Recht offener Staaten,Tbingen:1998 Fabr-Gojar, S.: Pojam suverenosti od Bodena do Hobsa, Beograd:2008 Fenske H., Mertens, D., Reinhard, W., Rosen, K.: Geschichte der politischen Ideen, Frankfurt am
Main:2004
Ferry J.: Die EU, die postnationale Konstellation und das Problem der Souverenitt, OSTEUROPA, Heft5-6:2004
Frhlich M.: Zwischen Friedensformel und Kriegsgrund: Der Kampf um Souverenitt, OsnabrckerJahrbuch Frieden und Wissenschaft, Osnabrck:2004
Fukujama F.: Graenje drave, Beograd:2007 ..: , :2001 .., .: , :2003 .: , :1970 Gasteyger C.: Europa von der Spaltung zur Einigung, Bonn:2001 Gat A.: Democracy Victory is Not Preordained, Foreign Affaires, July/August:2009 .: , :2001 .: , :2003
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
116/124
117
Gilges K.: Verlust der Souverenitt, Zeitschrift fr Sozialistische Politik und Wirtschaft, Ausgabe 5:2001 Grande E., Pauly L.: Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the 21 Century,
Toronto:2005
Habermas J.: Eseji o Europi: S prilozima Dietera Grimma i Hansa Vorlndera, Zagreb:2008 Hayman P.A., Williams J.: Westphalian Sovereignty: Rights, Intervention, Meaning and Context, Global
Society, Vol. 20, No. 4:2006
Hartley T.C.: Temelji prava Europske zajednice, Rijeka:2004 Held D.: Law od states, Law of peoples: Three models of sovereignty, Legal Theory, Vol. 8, N. 1, New
Haven:2002
Hiks S.: Politiki sistem Evropske Unije, Beograd:2007 Hinsli H.F.: Suverenost, Beograd:2001 Hirsch J.: Die Internationalisierung des Staates, Das Argument-Zeitschrift fr Philosophie undSozialwissenschaften, Nr. 234-238, Hobbes T.: Leviathan, Paris:1971 Hofmann H.: Souvern ist wer ber den Ausnahmezustand entscheidet, Der Staat, Band 44, Heft 2,
Berlin:2005
Igliar A.: Sociologija prava, Ljubljana:2004 Isensee J.: Subsidiaritt und Souverenitt im neuen Europa, Sociologia Internationalis, Band 34,
Berlin:1996
., ., .: , :2002 Jessop B.: The Future of the State in the Era of Globalization, Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, No.
3, Bonn:2003
Kaiser K.: Schwarz, H.P.: Weltpolitik im neuen Jahrhundert, Bonn:2000 .: , -:1995 .: , :2004 Khan A.: The extinction of Nation-States, AM.U.J.INTL L. and POLY, Vol.7:1992 Kelzen H.: Problem suverenosti i teorija meunarodnog prava, Beograd:2003 Kissinger H.: Diplomacy, New York:1994 Klein E.: Staatliche Souverenitt in Europa der Gegenwart, WeltTrends, No. 8:1997 .: , :
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
117/124
118
.: -- [:] : , :2002 Krasner S.: Sovereignity: Organized Hipocrisy, Princeton:1999 Kriele M.: Einfhrung in die Staatslehre, Stuttgart, Berlin:2003 Lalovi D.: Plaidoyer za dravu u Bodinovoj science politique (pogovor) [:] Bodin, 2002 Loonc A.: Suverenitet, mo i kriza, Novi Sad:2006 ..: , :1995 MacCormick N.: Questioning Sovereignty, New York:1999 Maitland F.W.: Township and Borough, London:1898 .: , :2004 Manz T.: Allianzen und Gruppen im Global Governance System-Multilateralismus zwischen partikularen
Interessen und universellen Anforderungen, Internationale Politik und Gesselschaft/International Politicsand Society, 2, Berlin:2007
., .: , :1978 Maus I.: Aspekti narodne suverenosti, Beograd:2001 Mayer F.C.: Europisches Sprachenverfassungsrecht, Der Staat, Band 44, Heft 3, Berlin:2005 ..: , :1995 Melkas E.: Sovereignty and Equity within the Framework of the Clima Regime, Reciel, No. 11 (2):2002 Messner D.: The European Union: Protagonist in a Multilateral World or Peripheral Power in the Asia-
Pacific century? Internationale Politik und Gesselschaft/International Politics and Society, 1, Berlin:2007 Minkkinen P.: The Ethos of Sovereignty: A Critical Appraisal, Human Rights Review, January-March:2007 ., .: , :2007 Nagan W.P., Hammer C.: The Changing Character of Sovereignty in International Law and International
Relations:2003
Nohlen D.: Kleines Lexikon der Politik, Mnchen:2002 Oeter S.: Souverenitt und Legitimation staatlicher herrschaft im europischen Mehrebenensystem [:]
Siegwart K.: Epiney A., Direkte Demokratie und Europische Union/Democratie directe et Unioneuropeene, Freiburg/Fribourg:1997
.: , :1993 ..: : ,
, 10, :2007
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
118/124
119
Partsch K.J.: Von der Souverenitt zur Solidaritt: Wandelt sich das Vlkerrecht? Europische Zeitschrift,Kehl am Rhein/Straburg:1991
Plattner M.F.: Souverenitt und Demokratie, Merkur, Heft 657-668:2004 .: : , , :2008 .: , :2008 .: , :1998 Rousseau J.J.: Drutveni ugovor, Zagreb:1918 Sack J.: Die Staatswerdung Europas-Kaum eine Spur von Stern und Stunde, Der Staat, Band 44, Heft 1,
Berlin:2005
Sasen S.: Gubitak kontrole? Suverenitet u doba globalizacije, Beograd:2004 Schliesky U.: Souverenitt und Legitimitt von Herrschaftsgewalt, Tbingen:2004 Schmitt C.: Politische Theologie, Berlin:1933 Seidl-Hohenveldern I.: sterreichs Souverenitt und die Europische Gemeinschaft, Der Rechtsstaat in
der Krise, Wien:1991
Spanknebel B.: Carl Schmitt, Neue Gesellschaft, No. 1-2, Frankfurt am Main:2010 imonovi I.: Globalizacija, dravna suverenost i meunarodni odnosi, Zagreb:2005 Stanford Enc.: Sovereignty:2003, : http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sovereignty Streinz R.: Europarecht, Heidelberg:2001 Tadi Lj.: Filozofija prava, Beograd:1996 Tadi Lj.: Nauka o politici, Beograd:1996 Thym D.: Book review, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 4, No. 1:2006 Weatherill S., Beaumont P.: EU Law, London:1999 Weber M.: Protestantska etika i duh kapitalizma, Sarajevo:1968 Weiler J.H.H.: The Constitution of Europe, Cambridge,1999 Woyke W.: Handwrterbuch Internationale Politik, Bonn:2000 Zippelius R.: Allgemeine Staatslehre, Mnchen:2003 .: , , :1995 .: : , , , :2000 ..: (), :2008
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
119/124
120
The State Sovereignty and the Globalization(Summary)
At the end of this research we would like once again to present the subject and the aim of the research, toexplain the specific methodology being used as well as to summarize the results.
At the very beginning we have established that sovereignty is an ambiguous term.
The sovereignty as a characteristic has been attributed to many social organizations by various intellectual
concepts throughout history. Apart from the state, this characteristic has been attributed to other organizationsstarting with the church, followed by the various guilds in the Middle Ages, ending with attempts to be attributed tovarious actors in the Modern in attempt to demonopolize and democratize the public authority.
Our initial hypothesis has been that the societies that lack state also lack sovereignty, meaning that thesovereignty is inherent to the state as most significant social organization. Therefore the attribute state sovereigntywas inserted in the title of our research, taking into consideration that only the state can be the holder of thischaracteristic.
The sovereignty is the nucleus, the substance of the concept public authority that is immanent to the state
distinguishing by this the state authority from any other social authority.Differing from many other researches on the state sovereignty in the past, we have tried to construct a
specific critical methodology in studying this term. That methodology is based on historical facts but also orientedtowards the variable present and the uncertain future the states of the Modern confront (the nation states).
Our methodology is not limited to the nation state and consequently does not consider the transformationand possibly the end of the nation state to be the end of the statehood history. The classical methodology isquestionable in the era of the globalization since it is centered exclusively to the nation state and initiates fromhistorically inaccurate assumption that with the emergence of the state of the Modern, that is the nation state, the
development of the statehood ends. Once the historically based up to date at that time, the classical methodologyconfuses the terms in the era of globalization (for example, being centered to the state with being centered to thenation state) resulting in deduction of conclusions that are not historically based and also incorrect. At the same timeit can not comprehend the changes in the rules of the movements in the social space since it disregards the globalsociety, that is a new reality in genesis.
ALEKSANDAR Lj. SPASOV
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
120/124
121
The critical methodology that we have suggested considers the state, and by that also the statesovereignty as historically variable categories that constantly change their content.
The critical methodology has the cosmopolitan point of view as its basis. The fundamental postulate of thecontemporary cosmopolitism is that politics must be separated from territory. The old principle based on territorialism
is being replaced by new principles in genesis that impose constant redefining of the boundaries of the politics thatnot always correspond to the state territory borders. This process of constant redefining of the boundaries of thepolitics results in self modernization of the societies and the states as well as their gradual transformation towardsthe new global reality of interdependent spaces.
Aiming to be consistent with the historical approach we have divided this entire research in three basicparts as follows: prehistory of the concept, history of the concept of the state sovereignty and the term statesovereignty in the era of the globalization.
In parallel with the explaining the intellectual concepts, we always aim to confront the idea and the social
reality, that is, the political practice in order to obtain as more clear image of the conditions in which these conceptsappeared and developed as possible.
The crucial constalation in the analysis of the prehistory of the concept and the political practice (fromancient times till the emergence of the Modern in 16-17 century A.D) is that although certain elements of the conceptcan be encountered with certain states in certain periods, still this concept as a whole (from present day perspectiveof its classical term) does not exist. This constalation however does not dispute neither the existence of certainpolitical systems that are part of every society in broadest sense of the term, nor the existence of a the state (in termsof existence of a governing organization based on territorial and not on blood relation principle as in the tribalsocieties). Nevertheless, the amalgamation of the public and the private, that is the equalization of the government
with every member of the community within the Hellenic Polis, the exclusion of whole categories of subjects freecitizens, from the system in the Roman state as well as deep segmentation within the frames of the feudal societiesfollowing the line community monarch and monarch Czar Church is negation of the term state sovereignty.Closest to this concept is Rome at the time of the Empire with the development of the imperium Romanum doctrineand the decree by Emperor Karakala by which all the subjects of the Empire are citizens of Rome.
The time period after the fall of the Western Empire and the domination of the Christian envision of theworld, contribute to the neglecting of the concept. Its re-actualization is a result of the new economic relations, moreprecisely of the development of the manufactured production and the ascent of the trade beginning from the
Renaissance era. The new economic conditions pressure the redefining of the organization of the politicalgovernment towards its centralization. The processes of centralization of the government are associated withreactions by the community inclined towards the traditional regulation of the social relations by the Church that insistson the existence of a single Christian world in Europe Christendom in which the supreme adjudicator in thereligious and secular affairs is the Church, that is the Pope and the Czar of the Holy Roman Empire (the two swordtheory).
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
121/124
122
The actual control over the territorial areas and the effective military power contributes to the triumph of thereligious monarchs who centralize the overall authority. The centralization includes the existence of the supreme,absolute, integral and non-hereditary government, that is, a monopoly over the enacting of the legal regulations(laws), their enforcement and utilization of physical force (compulsion) in order to protect the system. This classicalterm of the sovereignty (intellectually originated in the philosophy of Bodin and Hobs) in initial relations leads to the
creation of the state of the Modern. The concept gradually shifts from concentration of the sovereignty (publicauthority) to its possession by the individual the monarch, and further to the creation of the impersonal publicauthority, that is, public legal space (the state as public- legal body legal entity) that shall be the holder of thesovereignty.
In external (foreign) relations, the strengthening of the regional kings formally ends the fiction of theexistence of a unique Christian world in Europe in which the conflicts are solved within the doctrine of the naturalright, that is, the Christian ethics.
The wars, especially the Thirty Years War inspired by the resistance of the Catholic Church towards the
protestant reformation lead to the creation of new principles that have the independence of the state authority as theirbasis, that is, its will and consent as a unique source for creation of the rules for regulation of the relations in theinternational space.
The industrialization and the strengthening of the interdependence of the economies in the 19 th century,and especially the human tragedies in the First and the Second World War as well as the emergence of thesovereign state authority in totalitarian usurpation of the public space, have imposed the need of the redefinition ofthe concept. The redefining has emphasized the problem of the legitimacy of the government opposed to theeffective control over the territory and the population as crucial criteria in the classic views.
The democratic legitimacy was the result of that new liberal term of the state sovereignty and it was thebasis for the existence of the sovereign authority and development of a system for protection of the human rights thathas gradually acquired international character and legal protection of the human rights by institutions of supranationalcharacter.
The rise of the liberal views of the state sovereignty has introduced and accelerated the crisis of the worldof the Modern. The growing economic interdependence and the rise of the technological development in the 20 thcentury have lead to processes that had an essential influence over the humanity on local and on global level. Theseprocesses are named globalization. The globalization changes the social reality and by this imposes the need of
reexamination of the classical concepts of the statehood, the sovereignty, the nation and the identity.The emergence of the risk as a factor for integration has produced the necessity of creation of networks
and supranational (transnational) institutions for management that are responsible for the management of thetransnational processes, since the risk surpasses the territorial limitations of the nation state.
ALEKSANDAR Lj. SPASOV
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
122/124
123
Accordingly, the need for redefining of the state sovereignty emerges in direction of its transformation inopen, inclusive sovereignty.
The open sovereignty as a concept is separated from the element autonomy in favor of the integration. Inthis manner, the crisis of the sovereignty is transformed in strengthening of the state capacity and leads to an
increase of the effective sovereignty of the state. This state is named cosmopolitan state and the new era in thestatehood is named Second Modern.
Finally, we would like once again to elaborate the social justification of our research, especially for ourstate, Republic of Macedonia. The rather late establishment of the Macedonian state after the Second World Warwithin the Yugoslavian Federation and from the year 1991 as an independent and sovereign state, a member of theinternational community, raises the question of its future state development taking into consideration thetransformation of the world of the nation states.
Republic of Macedonia must not project its future state development in direction of the classical con cept of
the development of the 18th
and the 19th
century nation states. These concepts are historically dead and in presenttime terms are used solely by the radical populist political movements that calculate with the emotions of its targetgroups.
The fact that Republic of Macedonia, in reality has never constituted as a nation state should be viewedsolely as an advantage and not as a drawback.
The actual political interest instead of the idealism should lead Republic of Macedonia towards theregional cooperation and the European and the Euro-Atlantic integrations. Macedonia within the context of NATOand the EU has realistic chances to realize and secure its national priorities that have not been accomplished in the
19th
and the first half of the 20th
century.In that past regional and European context, Macedonia due to the multicultural nature of its society
unfortunately has failed to constitute itself as an independent state. However, this new context is very convenient forthe realization of the old priorities: multicultural society, which is considered to be an advantage and not a drawback,a society of economic and social welfare and solidarity, Republic of Macedonia as a significant political factor in theregional context, a positive political model in the European framework as well as spiritual and cultural union of theMacedonian people regardless which part of the Macedonian land they live in.
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
123/124
124
CIP . ,
321.011
321.011:304-027.511
, . / . : , , 2011. 119. : . ; 24
. : .111-115
ISBN 978-9989-109-56-0
a) ) COBISS.MK-ID 87243274
-
7/30/2019 FES Spasov Publikacija
124/124