February 17, 2021 Jacksonville, Florida 32212

3550 St. Johns Bluff Road S., Jacksonville, FL 32224 Ph: 904-565-2820 Fax: 904-565-2830 www.ses-grp.com

February 17, 2021 Mr. Joseph Smith Hazardous & Solid Waste Program Manager Public Works Department Naval Air Station Jacksonville Box 50, Building 1 Jacksonville, Florida 32212 Subject: Contract Number N69450-18-D-0100, Delivery Order N6945020F0301

Draft Final December 2020 Groundwater Monitoring Report, Operable Unit 3, Building 101S (PSC-11) FDEP Permit No. 0072437-HO-013, EPA/FDEP ID FL6 170 024 412

Dear Mr. Smith: Aerostar SES LLC (ASL), under contract to Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Southeast (NAVFAC), completed annual groundwater sampling in December 2020 at Building 101S at Naval Air Station (NAS) Jacksonville in Jacksonville, Florida. Building 101S is a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subpart X unit within Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act-designated Operable Unit 3 (OU 3). It is in the Fleet Readiness Center Southeast (FRCSE) in northeastern NAS Jacksonville near St. Johns River. The building is south of Albermarle Road. Figure 1 in Attachment 1 is a site location map. In August 2007, NAS Jacksonville discovered an abandoned underground ventilation piping system at Building 101S and reported it to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The system consists of concrete trenches and pits and a series of 12-inch and 30-inch to 36-inch vitrified clay pipes that were used in a push-pull ventilation system to convey solvent-laden air from the aircraft stripping area to outdoor air scrubbers. The ventilation piping is also connected to piping used to convey the aircraft stripping wastewater to the FRCSE Industrial Waste Water Treatment Plant (IWWTP) (Tetra Tech, Inc., November 2015). In addition, it appears the ventilation piping was not adequately secured when the system was taken out of service, and over time, wastewater entered the ventilation system. Reports also indicate that the IWWTP effluent would back up into the ventilation piping because of operational requirements associated with the IWWTP lift station. An abandoned blast media recovery system consisting of four sumps and a piping system varying from 27 inches to 30 inches in diameter is also part of this unit and subject to closure requirements (TRINITY Analysis & Development Corporation, February 2020). The primary objective of sampling activities at Building 101S is to monitor groundwater associated with the shallow surficial aquifer immediately downgradient of the site. A baseline groundwater sampling event was conducted in May 2009 at the direction of the FDEP, and the first semiannual event occurred in December 2009. Currently, sampling is currently annually under FDEP Permit No. 0072437-HO-013. Samples collected from monitoring wells OU3-MW101S-01, MW-780-1, and MW-780-2 are analyzed

2 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/17/21

for select volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260, select semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8270, and arsenic using EPA Method 6020.

• VOCs using Method 8260: o benzene, o sec-butylbenzene, o tert-butylbenzene, o chlorobenzene, o chloroethane, o 1,1-dichloroethene, o 1,1-dichloroethane, o cis 1,2-dichloroethene, o 1,1,1-trichloroethane, o 0-dichlorobenezene (1,2-dichloro-benzene), o trans 1,2-Dichloroethene, o trichloroethene (TCE), and o vinyl chloride.

• SVOCs using Method 8270: o bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, o bis-(2-ethlyhexyl)phthalate, o 1,2-dichlorobenzene, o 2-methylnapthalene, o naphthalene, and o 1-methylnaphthalene.

Field Operations

Field operations were conducted in accordance with the approved ASL sampling and analysis plan (SAP) (ASL, November 2020). In accordance with the permit, ASL notified FDEP prior to performing field activities. ASL used low-flow purging and sampling methods to collect groundwater samples from two shallow monitoring wells (MW-780-1 and MW-780-2) east of Building 101S and one shallow monitoring well north of Building B101S (OU3-MW101S-01). Groundwater sampling logs and the water level data summary are in Attachment 3. The groundwater samples were placed on ice and delivered via FedEx under chain of custody to Microbac Laboratories Inc., of Marietta, Ohio, for analysis. In accordance with the approved SAP, quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) samples included one equipment rinseate blank, one trip blank, one matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD), and one duplicate sample. The groundwater samples and rinseate blank were submitted for VOC analysis by EPA Method 8260B, SVOC analysis by EPA Method 8270D, and analysis for arsenic by EPA Method 6020. The trip blank was submitted for VOC analysis by EPA Method 8260B.

Analytical Results

Table 1 in Attachment 2 provides the analytical results from the December 2020 sampling event and historical laboratory data starting from 2012. The laboratory analytical report for the December 2020 sampling event is in Attachment 4. The analytical results for the December 2020 equipment blank rinseate or trip blank samples indicated that no analytes were detected above the limits of detection (LOD). Figure

3 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/17/21

2 presents the groundwater constituents for each monitoring well that have exceeded FDEP GCTLs during the past four sampling events. ASL conducted Stage IV data validation on all samples collected from wells near Building 101S. The data validation report is in Attachment 5, and the validated Form 1’s are in Attachment 6. The quality of the analytical data was acceptable, and no data was rejected. Precision, accuracy, comparability, and completeness of the data met data quality objectives and are acceptable for project decision making. QA measures included collecting a field duplicate sample, MS/MSD samples, and a trip blank. One field duplicate sample (required frequency of one duplicate for each 10 primary samples), one MS/MSD sample (required frequency of one MS/MSD sample for each 20 primary samples), one equipment rinseate (required frequency of one rinseate blank for each sampling event), and one trip blank (per cooler per day of volatile samples collected) were collected during the December 2020 Operable Unit 3, Building 101S sampling event. In monitoring well MW-780-1, VOCs cis ‐1,2‐dichlorethene exceeded its Groundwater Cleanup Target Level (GCTL) of 70 µg/L at 102 micrograms per liter (µg/L), and vinyl chloride exceeded its GCTL of 1 µg/L at 21.4 µg/L. No SVOCs were detected in the sample, but the limit of detection (LOD) for bis (2‐chloroethyl) ether at 0.5 µg/L was above the GCTL of 0.03 µg/L. Figure 3 in Attachment 1 shows the historical VOC concentrations in MW-780-1. No constituents of concern (COCs) were detected in the primary and duplicate groundwater samples collected from monitoring well OU3-MW101S-01. However, the LOD for bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (0.5 µg/L for both samples) was above the GCTL of 0.3 µg/L. No VOCs or SVOCs were detected above the GCTLs in the groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-780-2. However, arsenic was detected at 40.0 µg/L, which exceeded the GCTL of 10 µg/L. Figure 4 shows the historical arsenic concentrations in MW-780-2.

Conclusions

Results from the December 2020 sampling event at Building 101S indicated all COCs at OU3-MW101S-01 were below GCTLs, which is consistent with previous sampling events. Concentrations of vinyl chloride and cis-1,2-dichloroethene in monitoring well MW-780-1 were lower than in December 2019; concentrations of these COCs have continued to drop since the December 2017 sampling event. Arsenic in monitoring well MW-780-2 continued to exceed GCTLs. Arsenic has exceeded GCTLs since the December 2012 semiannual sampling event. The next groundwater sampling event at Building 101S is scheduled for December 2021.

References

Aerostar SES LLC, November 2020. Final Sampling and Analysis Plan Management and Monitoring Approach at Polishing Pond and Building 101S, Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida. Tetra Tech, Inc., November 2015. Remedial Investigation Report Addendum for Operable Unit 3 (OU 3), Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida. TRINITY Analysis & Development Corporation, February 2020. Draft Final December 2019 Groundwater Monitoring Results Operable Unit 3, Building 101S FDEP Permit Number 7237-HO-012, EPA/ FDEP ID FL6 170 024 412 Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida.

4 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/17/21

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact us at 478-397-4906.

Sincerely, Aerostar SES LLC

Brian Odom, PG (Florida PG No. 2844) Senior Program Manager Aerostar SES LLC

February 17, 2021 Date Florida Stamp or Seal

Attachments

Electronic cc: Adrienne Wilson, NAVFAC Southeast RPM ([email protected]) Dave Ford, NAS Jacksonville IRPM ([email protected]) Joseph Smith, NAS Jacksonville Hazardous and Solid Waste Program Manager ([email protected]) Merlin D. Russell Jr, Florida Department of Environmental Protection ([email protected]) Fletcher Herrald, Florida Department of Environmental Protection ([email protected])

Attachment 1

Figures

Building 101S(PSC-11)

Figure 1Site Location

Building 101S (PSC-11)Naval Air Station Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida

³0 1Miles

Drawn: TConatser Date: 2/5/2021

Service Layer Credits: Esri StreetMap North America

1-1

G:\M

3010.1

634.0

30

1.0

9 N

AS

Jackson

vill

e L

TM

and L

UC

\MX

D\M

MA

SA

P R

CR

A\L

ett

er

Repo

rt\F

igu

re_

1_L

oca

tion

_of_

NA

S_

Jacksonvill

e_R

CR

A_LR

.mxd;

Date

: 2/5

/20

21

M3010.1634.0301.09

_̂NAS

Jacksonville

Legend

Building 101S (PSC-11)

Installation Boundary

1 in = 290 miles Area Location

Naval Air StationJacksonville

!A?

!A?

!A?

MW-780-1

MW-780-2

OU3-MW101S-01

Building 101S(PSC-11)

1954A

102A

101

780

86

102

103

101G

168A

1954

1955

1002A

168

1952

101D101N

780C

102B

Figure 2Building 101S (PSC-11)

Groundwater Analytical Results,2017-2020

³0 80

Feet

1-2

Drawn: TConatser Date: 2/5/2021

Service Layer Credits: Esri ArcGIS Online Aerial Photography

Legend

!A? Shallow Monitoring Well Sampled

Site Boundary

Installation Boundary

Naval Air Station JacksonvilleJacksonville, Florida

Area Location

G:\M

30

10

.16

34

.03

01

.09

NA

S J

ackso

nvill

e L

TM

an

d L

UC

\MX

D\M

MA

SA

P R

CR

A\L

ett

er

Re

po

rt\F

igu

re_

2_

Bu

ildin

g_

10

1S

_A

na

lyic

al_

LR

.mxd

; D

ate

: 2

/5/2

02

1

M3010.1634.0301.09

1 in = 2 miles

Albermarle Avenue

Wa

sp S

t

Analyte Metals 6020 12/7/2017 12/12/2018 12/12/2019 12/7/2020

Arsenic 28.6 34.7 25.6 40.0

MW-780-2

Constituents of Concern Unit

FDEP GCTL

(62-777 FAC)

1,1- Dichloroethane μg/L 70

1,1- Dichloroethene μg/L 7

Arsenic μg/L 10

bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether μg/L 0.03

Chloroethane μg/L 12

cis -1,2-Dichloroethene μg/L 70

Vinyl Chloride μg/L 1

Notes: Indicates result exceeds Florida Department of Environmental

Protection (FDEP) Groundwater Cleanup Target Level (GCTL).

Bold value indicates analyte detected at concentration indicated.Gray text indicates analyte not detected at the specified l imit of

detection (LOD) below the FDEP GCTL (or SWCTL).

J = Reported value is an estimated value.

U = Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the limit

of detection (LOD).

< = Not detected above the specified l imit of detection.Laboratory results are posted only for groundwater samples aboveGCTLs within the last four years.

All results are shown in micrograms per l iter(µg/L).

Analyte VOC 8260 12/7/2017 12/12/2018 12/12/2019 12/7/2020

cis -1,2-Dichloroethene 344 252 141 102

Vinyl Chloride 88.5 67.8 36.3 21.4

Chloroethane 30.1 20.1 11.1 10.6

1,1-Dichlorethane 156 103 38.6 18.9

1,1-Dichlorethene 13.5 9 3.4 2.20

Analyte SVOC 8270 12/7/2017 12/12/2018 12/12/2019 12/7/2020

bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether 0.73 J <0.98 0.87 J 0.500 U

MW-780-1

1-3 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

Figure 3 Historical Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations in MW-780-1

1-4 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

Figure 4 Historical Arsenic Concentrations in MW-780-2

Attachment 2

Table

2-1M3010.1634.0301.09 2/5/21

Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results, Operable Unit 3 Building 101S Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida Well Identification FDEP

GCTL OU3-MW101S‐01

Sample Date 6/19/2012 12/5/2012 6/13/2013 12/10/2013 12/2/2014 12/1/2015 12/14/2016 12/7/2017 12/12/2018 12/12/2019 12/7/2020 Volatile Organic Compounds (8260B) µg/L

Benzene 1 <0.20 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.24 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U sec ‐Butylbenzene NE <0.22 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.27 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U tert ‐Butylbenzene NE <0.27 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U Chlorobenzene 100 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.2 <0.24 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U Chloroethane 12 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.5 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.00 U 1,1‐Dichloroethane 70 <0.25 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.26 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U 1,1‐Dichloroethene 7 <0.23 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.25 <0.27 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.00 U cis ‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 70 <0.26 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.33 <0.22 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U o ‐Dichlorobenzene 600 <0.25 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.29 <0.22 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U trans ‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 100 <0.35 <0.23 <0.23 <0.23 <0.34 <0.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U 1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 200 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.34 <0.26 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U Trichloroethene 3 <0.26 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.30 <0.22 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U Vinyl Chloride 1 <0.22 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.33 <0.25 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U

Semivolatile Organic Compounds (8270D1) µg/L bis (2‐Chloroethyl)ether 0.03 <0.51 <0.69 <0.69 NA <0.68 <0.70 <1.0 <0.95 <0.99 <0.99 0.500 U bis (2‐Ethylhexyl)phthalate 6 <1.0 <1.1 <1.1 NA <1.6 3.4 I <2.0 <1.9 <2.0 <2.0 5.00 U 1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 600 <0.95 <0.65 <0.65 NA <0.50 <0.51 <2.0 <1.9 <2.0 <2.0 0.500 U 1‐Methylnaphthalene 28 <0.48 <0.68 <0.68 <0.32 <0.50 <0.51 <1.0 <0.95 <0.99 <0.99 5.00 U 2‐Methylnaphthalene 28 <0.54 <0.66 <0.66 <0.32 <0.53 <0.51 <1.0 <0.95 <0.959 <0.99 0.500 U Naphthalene 14 <0.76 <0.61 <0.61 <0.32 <0.50 <0.51 <1.0 <0.95 <0.99 <0.99 0.400 U

Metals (6010C) µg/L Arsenic 10 2.1 I <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.4 1.6 I 1.7 J <5.0 1.5 J <5.0 1.19 J*

2-2 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/5/21

Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results, Operable Unit 3 Building 101S Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida (continued) Well Identification FDEP

GCTL MW-780-1


Benzene 1 0.24 I <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 0.63 I <1.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <1.0 0.285 J sec ‐Butylbenzene NE 0.28 I <0.21 0.32 I <0.21 <0.68 <1.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <1.0 0.500 U tert ‐Butylbenzene NE 0.38 I <0.29 0.39 I 0.30 I <0.72 <1.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <1.0 0.500 U Chlorobenzene 100 <1.0 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.60 <1.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <1.0 0.307 J Chloroethane 12 4.1 5.9 4.1 7.5 86.6 40.9 21.5 30.1 20.1 11.1 10.6 1,1‐Dichloroethane 70 2.3 5.7 3.7 4.3 119 253 154 156 103 38.6 18.9 1,1‐Dichloroethene 7 1.0 5.7 1.5 5.4 47.1 29.1 14.4 13.5 9 3.4 2.20 cis ‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 70 3.9 9.7 4.3 14.4 230 307 296 344 252 141 102 o ‐Dichlorobenzene 600 1.0 0.72 I 0.97 I 0.91 I 1.5 I <1.1 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <1.0 0.337 J trans ‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 100 <1.0 0.34 I 0.30 I 0.29 I 2.3 I 2.4 I 2.1 J 2.1 J 1.8 J 0.93 J 0.467 J 1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 200 0.43 I 0.47 I 0.56 I <0.20 <0.84 <1.3 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <1.0 0.500 U Trichloroethene 3 <0.26 <0.31 0.37 I <0.31 1.7 I 2.8 I 2.7 J <2.5 <2.5 <1.0 0.500 U Vinyl Chloride 1 1.6 6.8 1.6 7.0 77.6 85.2 78.9 88.5 67.8 36.3 21.4

Semivolatile Organic Compounds (8270D1) µg/L bis (2‐Chloroethyl)ether 0.03 <0.52 <0.70 <0.69 NA <0.67 1.3 I 0.79 J 0.73 J <0.98 0.87 J 0.500 U bis (2‐Ethylhexyl)phthalate 6 1.9 I <1.1 <1.1 NA <1.5 <1.0 <2.0 <1.9 <2.0 <1.9 5.00 U 1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 600 <0.96 0.74 I <0.65 NA 0.90 I 1.1 I 0.61 J <1.9 <2.0 <1.9 0.500 U 1‐Methylnaphthalene 28 2.2 I <0.69 <0.68 <0.33 <0.49 <0.50 <1.0 <0.97 <0.98 <0.95 5.00 U 2‐Methylnaphthalene 28 3.0 I <0.67 <0.66 <0.33 <0.52 <0.50 <1.0 <0.97 <0.98 <0.95 0.500 U Naphthalene 14 1.6 I <0.62 <0.61 <0.33 <0.49 <0.50 <1.0 <0.97 <0.98 <0.95 0.400 U

Metals (6010C) µg/L Arsenic 10 3.1 I 6.7 I 3.9 I 4.4 I <2.4 2.8 I 1.9 J <5.0 4.5 J 3.1 J 3.48*

2-3 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/5/21

Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results, Operable Unit 3 Building 101S Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida (continued) Well Identification FDEP

GCTL MW-780-2


Benzene 1 <0.20 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.24 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U sec ‐Butylbenzene NE <0.22 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.27 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U tert ‐Butylbenzene NE <0.27 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U Chlorobenzene 100 <0.20 0.94 I 0.27 I <0.20 <0.24 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U Chloroethane 12 1.0 I 0.68 I 0.77 I <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.00 U 1,1‐Dichloroethane 70 1.7 6.4 3.6 2.4 <0.26 <0.20 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.250 U 1,1‐Dichloroethene 7 <0.23 0.78 I 0.40 I <0.20 <0.25 <0.27 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.00 U cis ‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 70 2.5 4.2 2.6 2.8 <0.33 0.24 I <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.277 J o ‐Dichlorobenzene 600 <0.25 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22 <0.29 <0.22 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 0.250 U trans ‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 100 <0.35 <0.23 <0.23 <0.23 <0.34 <0.21 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U 1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 200 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.34 <0.26 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U Trichloroethene 3 0.90 I 1.9 0.66 I 0.64 I <0.30 <0.22 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U Vinyl Chloride 1 1.4 3.5 1.3 1.2 <0.33 <0.25 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.500 U

Semivolatile Organic Compounds (8270D1) µg/L bis (2‐Chloroethyl)ether 0.03 <0.51 0.88 I <0.69 NA <0.65 <0.68 <1.0 <0.95 <0.97 <1.0 0.500 U bis (2‐Ethylhexyl)phthalate 6 1.4 I <1.2 <1.1 NA <1.5 <0.99 <2.0 <1.9 <1.9 <2.0 5.00 U 1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 600 <0.95 <0.68 <0.65 NA <0.47 <0.50 <2.0 <1.9 <1.9 <2.0 0.500 U 1‐Methylnaphthalene 28 <0.48 <0.70 <0.68 <0.32 <0.47 <0.50 <1.0 <0.95 <0.97 <1.0 5.00 U 2‐Methylnaphthalene 28 0.60 I <0.69 <0.66 <0.32 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.95 <0.97 <1.0 0.500 U Naphthalene 14 <0.76 <0.64 <0.61 <0.32 <0.47 <0.50 <1.0 <0.95 <0.97 <1.0 0.400 U

Metals (6010C) µg/L Arsenic 10 3.6 I 11.6 11.0 28.9 34.6 46.1 46.7 28.6 34.7 25.6 40.0*

Bold results indicate a reported concentration above the laboratory detection limit Yellow shaded cells indicate a reported concentration above the FDEP GCTL Compounds not shown were not reported above the laboratory method detection limit *= Results from 12/7/2020 analyzed by EPA Method 6020 reported in mg/L changed to µg/L to match other reported numbers 1Results from 12/10/2013 analyzed by EPA Method 8270D SIM µg/L = micrograms per liter < = not detected above method detection limit FDEP GCTL = Florida Department of Environmental Protection Groundwater Cleanup Target Level I = result is above the laboratory method detection limit but below the practical quantitation limit J = estimated value NA = not analyzed NE = not established U = The analyte was analyzed for but was not detected above the reported quantitation limit.

Attachment 3

Groundwater Sampling Logs and Water Level Data Summary

M3010.16634.0301.09

1-1 2/4/21

M3010.16634.0301.09

1-2 2/4/21

M3010.16634.0301.09

1-3 2/4/21

1 of 1

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

Well: Well: Well:

Time: Time: Time:

DTW: DTW: DTW:

12/7/2020J.Klein/R.Reynolds

5.45 FT BTOC

Sample Technician: Date:

Depth To Water Record

Installation: ASL Project No:

Project Name: OU 3 PSC 11 Building 101SM3010.1634.0301.09

NAS Jacksonville

6.09 FT BTOC

1135

OU3‐MW101S‐01

MW‐780‐1

1025

FT BTOC

MW‐780‐2

1020

5.63 FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

Sheet:

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

FT BTOC

M3010.16634.0301.09

1-4 2/4/21

Attachment 4

Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain-of-Custody Forms

Microbac Laboratories Inc., - Marietta, OH

Client Project ID:

NAS Jacksonville

For:

Aerostar

Sharon Pennington

1006 Floyd Culler Court

Oak Ridge, TN 37830

Project State of Origin: Florida

Project Requested Certification:

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation2936.01Microbac Laboratories Inc., - Marietta, OH

Certification Exceptions:

These analytes are not on Microbac Laboratories Inc., - Marietta, OH's scope of accreditation for the Aqueous matrix.

1-Methylnaphthalene

Stephanie Mossburg

Customer Relations Manager

All test results meet the requirements of the QAPP and other applicable contract terms and conditions. Any exceptions are attached to

this cover page or addressed in the method narratives presented in the report. All results for soil samples are reported on a

'dry-weight' basis unless specified otherwise. Analytical results for water and wastes are reported on a 'as received' basis unless

specified otherwise. A statement of uncertainty for each analysis is available upon request. The reported results are related only to the

samples analyzed as received. This laboratory report may be released as a hardcopy and in computer-readable form submitted

electronically or on diskette. This laboratory report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Microbac

Laboratories, Inc.

Authorized By:

Issued: 12/18/2020

Laboratory Project Manager:

[email protected]

Stephanie Mossburg

Customer Relations Manager

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.

158 Starlite Drive | Marietta, OH 45750 | 800.373.4071 p | www.microbac.com

Page 1 of 19 M3010.1634.0301.09

4-1 2/4/21

Laboratory Report Number: M0L0578

Client Project ID: NAS Jacksonville

Cooler Receipt Log

Cooler ID: Default Cooler Temp: 0.8ºC

Cooler ID: New Cooler Temp: 3.6ºC

Cooler Inspection Checklist

Ice Present or not required? Yes

Shipping containers sealed or not required? Yes

Custody seals intact or not required? Yes

Chain of Custody (COC) Present? Yes

COC includes customer information? Yes

Relinquished and received signature on COC? Yes

Sample collector identified on COC? Yes

Sample type identified on COC? Yes

Correct type of Containers Received Yes

Correct number of containers listed on COC? Yes

Containers Intact? Yes

COC includes requested analyses? Yes

Enough sample volume for indicated tests received? Yes

Sample labels match COC (Name, Date & Time?) Yes

Samples arrived within hold time? Yes

Correct preservatives on COC or not required? Yes

Chemical preservations checked or not required? Yes

Preservation checks meet method requirements? Yes

VOA vials have zero headspace, or not recd.? Yes


158 Starlite Drive | Marietta, OH 45750 | 800.373.4071 p | www.microbac.com Page 2 of 19 M3010.1634.0301.09

4-2 2/4/21



Microbac Laboratories Inc., - Marietta, OH CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

M0L0578-01

Client ID: EB-09

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84849.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/14/2020 17:00

12/15/2020 20:12

12/07/2020 10:15

QualResult DL LOQLODCAS NumberAnalyte Flag

0.5321,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0695-50-1 0.266 U0.532 Q2

5.321-Methylnaphthalene 10.690-12-0 2.66 U5.32 Q2,Y

0.5322-Methylnaphthalene 1.0691-57-6 0.266 U0.532 Q2

0.532bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 1.06111-44-4 0.266 U0.532 Q2

5.32bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 10.6117-81-7 2.66 U5.32 Q2

0.426Naphthalene 0.85191-20-3 0.213 U0.426 Q2

Surrogate Recovery Limits Units QualifierQ

109 % Rec33-141p-Terphenyl-d14

38.2 % Rec10-94Phenol-d5

102 % Rec35-114Nitrobenzene-d5

59.8 % Rec21-1002-Fluorophenol

101 % Rec43-1162-Fluorobiphenyl

129 % Rec10-1232,4,6-Tribromophenol S1*

M0L0578-01

Client ID: EB-09

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169022.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 19:38

12/08/2020 19:38

12/07/2020 10:15


0.5001,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0071-55-6 0.250 U0.500

0.2501,1-Dichloroethane 0.50075-34-3 0.125 U0.250

1.001,1-Dichloroethene 2.0075-35-4 0.500 U1.00

0.2501,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50095-50-1 0.125 U0.250

0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250

0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-59-2 0.250 U0.500

0.500sec-Butylbenzene 1.00135-98-8 0.250 U0.500

0.500tert-Butylbenzene 1.0098-06-6 0.250 U0.500

0.500trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-60-5 0.250 U0.500

0.500Trichloroethene 1.0079-01-6 0.250 U0.500

0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500



4-3 2/4/21




M0L0578-01

Client ID: EB-09

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169022.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 19:38

12/08/2020 19:38

12/07/2020 10:15


103 % Rec81-1181,2-Dichloroethane-d4

110 % Rec85-1144-Bromofluorobenzene

101 % Rec80-119Dibromofluoromethane

103 % Rec89-112Toluene-d8

M0L0578-01

Client ID: EB-09

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-060

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 06:31

12/09/2020 09:56

12/07/2020 10:15


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.000500 U0.00100



4-4 2/4/21




M0L0578-01RE1

Client ID: EB-09

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS11

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20L0005

11M41566.D

B0L0587 / S0L0176

12/10/2020 14:05

12/10/2020 14:05

12/07/2020 10:15


1.00Chloroethane (Ethyl chloride) 2.0075-00-3 0.500 U1.00



99.2 % Rec89-112Toluene-d8

95.9 % Rec81-1181,2-Dichloroethane-d4

95.5 % Rec80-119Dibromofluoromethane



4-5 2/4/21




M0L0578-02

Client ID: MW-780-2

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84850.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/14/2020 17:00

12/15/2020 20:42

12/07/2020 11:04







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2


96.4 % Rec10-1232,4,6-Tribromophenol

76.4 % Rec43-1162-Fluorobiphenyl

76.8 % Rec35-114Nitrobenzene-d5




M0L0578-02

Client ID: MW-780-2

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297127.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 21:48

12/14/2020 21:48

12/07/2020 11:04






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250


0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-59-2 0.250 J0.277





0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500



4-6 2/4/21




M0L0578-02

Client ID: MW-780-2

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297127.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 21:48

12/14/2020 21:48

12/07/2020 11:04






M0L0578-02

Client ID: MW-780-2

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-061

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 06:31

12/09/2020 09:59

12/07/2020 11:04


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.0005000.0400



4-7 2/4/21




M0L0578-03

Client ID: OU3-MW101S-01

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84851.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/14/2020 17:00

12/15/2020 21:13

12/07/2020 12:06







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2



123 % Rec10-1232,4,6-Tribromophenol





M0L0578-03


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297129.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 22:17

12/14/2020 22:17

12/07/2020 12:06






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250







0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500



4-8 2/4/21




M0L0578-03


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297129.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 22:17

12/14/2020 22:17

12/07/2020 12:06





98.1 % Rec85-1144-Bromofluorobenzene

M0L0578-03


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-062

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 06:31

12/09/2020 10:02

12/07/2020 12:06


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.000500 J0.00119



4-9 2/4/21




M0L0578-04

Client ID: OU3-MW101S-01-DUP

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84852.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/14/2020 17:00

12/15/2020 21:44

12/07/2020 12:06







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2







85.1 % Rec33-141p-Terphenyl-d14

M0L0578-04


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169034.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 23:49

12/08/2020 23:49

12/07/2020 12:06






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250






0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500



4-10 2/4/21




M0L0578-04


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169034.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 23:49

12/08/2020 23:49

12/07/2020 12:06






M0L0578-04


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-067

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 06:31

12/09/2020 10:17

12/07/2020 12:06


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.000500 J0.00127



4-11 2/4/21




M0L0578-04RE1


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS11

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20L0005

11M41567.D

B0L0587 / S0L0176

12/10/2020 14:43

12/10/2020 14:43

12/07/2020 12:06










4-12 2/4/21




M0L0578-05

Client ID: MW-780-1

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84853.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/14/2020 17:00

12/15/2020 22:14

12/07/2020 11:08







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2








M0L0578-05

Client ID: MW-780-1

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297119.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 19:54

12/14/2020 19:54

12/07/2020 11:08



0.2501,1-Dichloroethane 0.50075-34-3 0.12518.9

1.001,1-Dichloroethene 2.0075-35-4 0.5002.20

0.2501,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50095-50-1 0.125 J0.337

0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 J0.285

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 J0.307

1.00Chloroethane (Ethyl chloride) 2.0075-00-3 0.50010.6

0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-59-2 0.250102



0.500trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-60-5 0.250 J0.467


0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.25021.4



4-13 2/4/21




M0L0578-05

Client ID: MW-780-1

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297119.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 19:54

12/14/2020 19:54

12/07/2020 11:08






M0L0578-05

Client ID: MW-780-1

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-057

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 06:31

12/09/2020 09:47

12/07/2020 11:08


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.0005000.00348



4-14 2/4/21




M0L0578-06

Client ID: TB-12072020

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169021.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 19:17

12/08/2020 19:17

12/07/2020 11:08






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250






0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500








4-15 2/4/21




M0L0578-06RE1

Client ID: TB-12072020

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS11

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20L0005

11M41565.D

B0L0587 / S0L0176

12/10/2020 13:30

12/10/2020 13:30

12/07/2020 11:08










4-16 2/4/21



Notes and Definitions

J: The result is an estimated quantity. The associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.

mg/L: Milligrams per Liter

Q2: LCS recovery is above acceptance limits. However there is no impact on the reported value.

S1: Surrogate recovery is above acceptance limits.

U: The analyte was analyzed for but was not detected above the reported quantitation limit. The quantitation limit has been adjusted for any dilution or

concentration of the sample.

ug/L: Micrograms per Liter

ug/mL: Micrograms per Milliliter

Y: This analyte is not on the laboratory's current scope of accreditation.

DL: Detection Limit

LOD: Limit of Detection

LOQ: Limit of Quantitation



4-17 2/4/21

Pa

ge

18

of 1

9

M3010.1634.0301.09

4-18 2/4/21

of 19 M3010.1634.0301.09

4-19 2/4/21

Attachment 5

Data Validation Report

Data Validation Report December 2020 Groundwater Monitoring Results

Operable Unit 3, Building 101S Jacksonville, Florida

Samples Collected December 2020 FDEP Permit Number 0072437-HO-12

EPA/FDEP ID FL6 170 024 412

January 20, 2021

Prepared by Aerostar SES LLC

1006 Floyd Culler Court Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

under Contract No. N69450-18-D-0100

Delivery Order No. N6945020F0301

5-ii M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

Table of Contents Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... iv

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1

2. PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................................... 1

3. EXPLANATION OF DATA QUALITY INDICATORS ................................................................. 2 3.1 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE (LCS) AND LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DUPLICATE (LCSD) ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 MATRIX SPIKE (MS) AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (MSD) ....................................................... 3 3.3 DILUTION TEST (SERIAL DILUTION) .............................................................................................. 3 3.4 SURROGATE SPIKE .......................................................................................................................... 3 3.5 INTERNAL STANDARD .................................................................................................................... 3 3.6 BLANKS .......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.7 LABORATORY AND FIELD DUPLICATE ........................................................................................... 4

4. DEFINITIONS OF QUALIFIERS THAT MAY BE USED DURING DATA VALIDATION ... 4

5. QUALIFICATION REASON CODES .............................................................................................. 5

6. CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND SAMPLE RECEIPT CONDITION DOCUMENTATION ........... 6

7. SPECIFIC DATA VALIDATION FINDINGS ................................................................................. 6 7.1 HOLDING TIMES ............................................................................................................................. 6 7.2 INITIAL CALIBRATION .................................................................................................................... 7 7.3 INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION (ICV) .................................................................................. 7 7.4 CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION (CCV) ........................................................................ 7 7.5 LABORATORY BLANK ..................................................................................................................... 7 7.6 FIELD OR TRIP BLANK .................................................................................................................... 7 7.7 INTERNAL STANDARD (IS) ............................................................................................................. 7 7.8 SURROGATES .................................................................................................................................. 8 7.9 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE (LCS) ........................................................................................ 8 7.10 MATRIX SPIKE (MS)/ MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (MSD) ANALYSIS ............................................ 8 7.11 DILUTION TEST (SERIAL DILUTION) .............................................................................................. 9 7.12 FIELD DUPLICATE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 9

8. DATA REPORTING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ......................................................... 9

9. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 10

10. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 10

List of Tables

Table 1-1 Field Samples Submitted to Microbac Laboratories Inc. ............................................................. 1 Table 7-1 Initial Calibration Verification Exceptions to Criteria for Recovery ........................................... 7 Table 7-2 Continuing Calibration Verification Exceptions to Criteria for Recovery ................................... 7 Table 7-3 Exceptions to Initial Standard Results .......................................................................................... 7 Table 7-4 Exceptions to Recovery Results for Surrogates ............................................................................ 8 Table 7-5 Exceptions to Laboratory Control Sample Recovery Criteria ...................................................... 8 Table 7-6 Exceptions to Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Analyses .............................................. 8 Table 7-7 Field Duplicates ............................................................................................................................ 9 Table 9-1 Qualified Data ............................................................................................................................ 10

5-iii M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

Acronyms and Abbreviations

% Percent %D Percent Difference ASL Aerostar SES LLC B Blank contamination BS Blank Spike CCB Continuing Calibration Blank CCV Continuing Calibration Verification COC Chain of Custody CLP Contract Laboratory Program DL (Method) Detection Limit DoD Department of Defense DUP Duplicate EPA Environmental Protection Agency FB Field Blank FD Field Duplicate FS Field Split ICB Initial Calibration Blank ICAL Initial Calibration ICV Initial Calibration Verification ID Identification IS Internal Standard J Estimated Value LCS Laboratory Control Sample LCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate LOD Limit of Detection LOQ Limit of Quantification MB Method Blank MS Matrix Spike MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate N Normal Sample OPR Ongoing Precision and Recovery sample QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC Quality control RPD Relative Percent Difference RRF Relative Response Factor RSD Relative Standard Deviation SDG Sample Delivery Group TB Trip Blank U Not Detected UJ Not Detected; associated value is an estimate X Rejected

5-1 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

1. INTRODUCTION

Three groundwater samples, one equipment blank, one trip blank, and one field duplicate were collected for volatiles, semivolatiles, and arsenic in December 2020 as a part of the Annual Long Term Monitoring at NAS Jacksonville RCRA Site, OU3 PSC 11 (Building 101S). The samples were subsequently sent to Microbac Laboratories Inc., Marietta, OH for the analyses listed above. Data validation of the samples was completed in January 2021. An inventory of these samples by field sample identification, sample collection date, sample matrix, laboratory sample delivery group (SDG), laboratory sample identification (ID) dilution, and validation level are presented in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1 Field Samples Submitted to Microbac Laboratories Inc.

Sample ID Sample

Date Sample Matrix Lab SDG

Lab Sample ID Dilution

Validation Level

EB-09 12/07/2020 WQ M0L0578 M0L0578-01 1 S4VM MW-780-2 12/07/2020 WG M0L0578 M0L0578-02 1 S4VM OU3-MW101S-01 12/07/2020 WG M0L0578 M0L0578-03 1 S4VM OU3-MW101S-01-DUP

12/07/2020 WG M0L0578 M0L0578-04 1 S4VM

MW-780-1 12/07/2020 WG M0L0578 M0L0578-05 1 S4VM TB-12072020 12/07/2020 WQ M0L0578 M0L0578-06 1 S4VM

ID = identification SDG = sample delivery group

2. PROCEDURES

Aerostar SES LLC (ASL) performed Stage IV validation on all samples associated with this data validation report. The Stage IV validation includes review of the quality control (QC) results in the laboratory’s analytical report and reported on QC summary forms as well as recalculation checks of selected results and review of the instrument raw data outputs. This data validation has been performed in accordance with

• Department of Defense (DoD), 2019. DoD Quality Systems Manual for Environmental Laboratories, Version 5.3. May 2019.

• Department of Defense (DoD), 2019. General Data Validation Guidelines, Revision 1, November 2019.

• Department of Defense (DoD), 2020. Data Validation Procedure for Organic Analysis by GC/MS. May 2020.

• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2014. Method 6020, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry, Revision B, July 2014.

• EPA, 1996a. Method 8260, Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, Revision B, December 1996.

• EPA, 1996b, Method 8270, Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Revision C, December 1996.

• EPA 2002. Guidance on Environmental Data Verification and Data Validation, November 2002. • EPA, 2009. Guidance for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory Analytical Data for

Superfund Use, January 2009. • EPA, 2017. National Functional Guidelines for Organic Superfund Methods Data Review, EPA-

540-R-2017-002, January 2017.

5-2 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

The Superfund guideline was written specifically for the contract laboratory program, and has been adjusted for the purposes of this data review where it differs from method-specific, quality assurance project plan (QAPP)-specified, or laboratory-specified QC requirements. The laboratory's certified analytical report and supporting documentation were reviewed to assess the following:

• Data package and electronic data deliverable completeness; • Laboratory case narrative review; • Chain of custody (COC) compliance; • Holding time compliance; • QC sample frequency; • Initial calibration, initial calibration verification (ICV), and continuing calibration verification

(CCV) compliance with method-specified criteria; • Presence or absence of laboratory contamination as established by laboratory blanks; • Accuracy and bias as demonstrated by recovery of extracted internal standards, injected internal

standards, surrogates, and laboratory control sample (LCS); • Analytical precision as a relative percent difference (RPD) of analyte concentration between

control samples (LCS/LCSD); • Sampling and analytical precision as RPD of analyte concentration between field duplicates; • Assessment of field contamination as demonstrated by field and trip blanks; • To the degree possible, the degree of conformance to method requirements and good laboratory

practices. In general, it is important to recognize that no analytical data results are guaranteed to be absolute, even if the results of all QC examinations meet criteria. Adherence to QC protocols serves to increase confidence in data, but any reported value may potentially contain error. The data validation qualifiers (Section 4) applied by the reviewer were recorded in a column adjacent and to the right of the target compound name. A data validation reason code, where applicable, was also added to each of the reviewer’s qualifiers to provide the user with a means to identify which results were qualified and the reason for the qualifiers (Section 5.0). The data were labeled in the validation checklist with the appropriate stage of data validation performed according to General Data Validation Guidelines (February 2018).

3. EXPLANATION OF DATA QUALITY INDICATORS

Summary explanations of the specific data quality indicators reviewed during this data quality review are presented below.

3.1 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE (LCS) AND LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DUPLICATE (LCSD)

The Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) is analyzed to assess general method performance based on the ability of the laboratory to successfully recover target analytes from a control matrix. The LCS is similar in composition to the method blank in that it is an aliquot of analyte-free water or analyte-free solid (e.g., Ottawa sand, anhydrous sodium sulfate, or other purified solid) to which known amounts of the method analytes are added. LCS analyses help determine if the system is running properly (i.e., within pre-defined limits). One LCS is prepared and analyzed for every analytical batch. The LCS sample is

5-3 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

prepared and analyzed in the same analytical batch and in exactly the same manner as the other routine samples. The recovery of the target analytes in the LCS analysis demonstrates whether the methodology is in control and the laboratory is capable of making unbiased measurements. The results of the LCS are evaluated in conjunction with other QC information to determine the acceptability of the data generated for that batch of samples.

3.2 MATRIX SPIKE (MS) AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (MSD)

Matrix spikes (MS) and matrix spike duplicates (MSD) are aliquots of environmental samples to which known concentrations of certain target analytes have been added before sample preparation, cleanup, and determinative procedures have been implemented. The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate analyses are used to assess the performance of the method by measuring the effects of interferences caused by the sample matrix and reflects the bias of the method for the particular matrix in question.

3.3 DILUTION TEST (SERIAL DILUTION)

The dilution test is used to determine if physical or chemical interferences are present in samples for which ICP/MS analysis is performed. If the analyte concentration is within the linear range of the instrument and sufficiently high (minimally, a factor of 25 times greater than the LLOQ), an analysis of a 1:5 dilution should agree to within ± 20% of the original determination. If not, then a chemical or physical interference effect is suspected.

3.4 SURROGATE SPIKE

Surrogates are most commonly used to monitor the performance of organic analyses using methods such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), and gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Surrogate spikes are added to field samples and QC samples for organic analyses at known amounts, and their recoveries are used to assess matrix effects and, to some extent, verify proper processing and instrument performance for each sample. The analytes used as surrogates mimic the behavior of the target analyte(s) throughout sample preparation and instrument determination. Surrogates are organic compounds which are similar to the target analytes in chemical composition and behavior in the analytical process, but are not normally found in the environmental samples. Surrogates added to LCS samples and blanks are used to assess recovery in a matrix known to be free from interference. This information can be used to determine the magnitude of matrix interference effects on environmental sample results.

3.5 INTERNAL STANDARD

For semivolatile, volatile, and ICP/MS analysis, internal standards are spiked into prepared field samples and QC samples (or sample extracts). Their recovery is used to demonstrate the lack of severe matrix effect in the instrumental analysis by setting criteria for the internal standard response in comparison to a response in a sample with a known lack of matrix effect (i.e., a standard). Internal standards are also used to account for matrix effects and/or variability in instrument response by normalizing the response of the target analytes and surrogates, thereby decreasing measurement bias to the extent that their behavior mimics that of the target analytes.

5-4 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

3.6 BLANKS

Blank samples are aliquots of analyte-free matrix that are used as negative controls to verify that the sample collection, storage, preparatory, and analysis systems do not produce false positive results. Method blanks are prepared and analyzed to assess background interference or contamination that exists in the analytical system that might lead to the reporting of elevated concentration levels or false positive data. The method blank is defined as an interference-free blank matrix, similar to the sample matrix, to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in sample preparation and carried through the complete sample preparation, cleanup, and determinative procedures. Field blanks include any sample submitted from the field that is identified as a blank. These include trip blanks, rinsates, equipment blanks, etc. Field blanks may also be obtained by the sampling organization to measure ambient contamination in the field. If this type of field blank is requested, a container of reagent water or a solid blank material is opened in the field for a predefined period of time. The sample is then sent to the laboratory for analysis. They are used to monitor for possible sample contamination originating from ambient conditions at the sample location and to monitor subsequent sample handling, storage, preparatory, and analytical procedures. Laboratory and field blanks are processed by the laboratory in a manner identical to those used to process associated field samples. Target analytes should not be found in laboratory blanks above one-half the limit of quantification (LOQ). When target analytes are detected in blanks, analyte concentrations in the associated samples less than five (5) times the concentration detected in the blank are qualified as either “JB” or “B”.

3.7 LABORATORY AND FIELD DUPLICATE

A laboratory duplicate is an analysis or measurement of the variable of interest performed identically on two sub-samples of the same sample, usually taken from the same container. The results from duplicate analyses are used to evaluate analytical or measurement precision and include variability associated with sub-sampling and the matrix, but not the precision of field sampling, preservation, or storage internal to the laboratory. Field duplicates are useful in documenting the precision of the sampling process. Field duplicates are used to assess the homogenization of the samples in the field, the reproducibility of sample preparation and analysis, and potential heterogeneity of the matrix.

4. DEFINITIONS OF QUALIFIERS THAT MAY BE USED DURING DATA VALIDATION

Qualifier Definition

X The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and to meet quality control criteria. These may not be used for decision making.

U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample limit of detection (LOD).

B The analyte was detected in the sample and an associated blank and the concentration detected in the sample was less than 5 times the concentration detected in the blank.

5-5 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

Qualifier Definition

N The analyte is a tentatively identified compound.

J

The analyte was positively identified, however, the quantitation is estimated because of discrepancies in meeting certain analyte-specific QC criteria; or the associated numerical value is the estimated concentration of the analyte in the sample above the method detection limit (DL) and below the LOQ.

UJ The material was analyzed for, but was not detected. However, the result is estimated because of discrepancies in meeting certain analyte-specific QC criteria

5. QUALIFICATION REASON CODES

Reason Code Definition

01 Sample received outside of ≤ 6° C 01A Improper sample preservation 02 Holding time exceeded 02A Extraction hold time 02B Analysis hold time 03 Instrument performance – outside criteria 03A 4-Bromofluorobenzene Tune 03B Decafluorotriphenylphosphine Tune 03C DDT and/or Endrin % breakdown exceeds criteria 03D Retention time windows 03E Resolution 04 Initial calibration results outside specified criteria 04A Compound mean relative response factor (RRF) QC criteria not met 04B Individual % relative standard deviation (RSD) criteria not met 04C Regression factor or correlation coefficient >0.995 05 Continuing calibration results outside specified criteria 05A Compound mean RRF QC criteria not met 05B Compound % Difference (%D) QC criteria not met 06 Result qualified as a result of the 5x/10x blank correction 06A Method or preparation blank 06B Initial calibration blank (ICB) or continuing calibration blank (CCB) 06C Equipment Blank (EB) 06D Trip Blank (TB) 06E Field Blank (FB) 07 Surrogate recoveries outside control limits 07A Sample surrogate recoveries 07B Associated method blank or LCS surrogate recoveries

5-6 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

Reason Code Definition

08 MS/MSD/Duplicate results outside criteria 08A MS and/or MSD recovery not within control limits (accuracy) 08B RPD outside acceptance criteria (precision) 09 Post digestion spike outside criteria graphite furnace atomic absorption (GFAA) 10 Internal standards (IS or EIS) outside specified control limits 10A Recovery of IS or EIS 10B Retention time of IS or EIS 11 Laboratory control sample recoveries outside specified limits 11A Recovery 11B RPD (if run in duplicate) 12 Interference check standard 13 Serial dilution 14 Tentatively identified compounds 15 Quantification 16 Multiple results available; alternate result preferred 17 Field duplicate RPD criteria is exceeded 18 Percent difference between original and second column exceeds QC criteria 19 Professional judgment was used to qualify the data 20 Pesticide clean-up checks 21 Target compound identification 22 Radiological calibration 23 Radiological quantification 24 Reported result and/or lab qualifier revised to reflect validation findings

6. CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND SAMPLE RECEIPT CONDITION DOCUMENTATION

According to the case narratives associated with this report, there were no anomalies noted upon receipt of the samples at the laboratory.

7. SPECIFIC DATA VALIDATION FINDINGS

Results from these samples may be considered usable with the limitations and exceptions described Sections 7.1 through 7.12 and Section 8.

7.1 HOLDING TIMES

All samples met holding times for extraction and analysis.

5-7 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

7.2 INITIAL CALIBRATION

The specified number of standards and associated quality control criteria were met for initial calibration.

7.3 INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION (ICV)

Initial calibration verification associated with this sample set met criteria for recovery with exceptions noted in Table 7-1.

Table 7-1 Initial Calibration Verification Exceptions to Criteria for Recovery

SDG Method ICV Exception Comments/Samples

Affected Action M0L0578 8260 S0K0202-ICV1

(6M168421.D) Chloroethane recovery result was low.

Chloroethane was not reported on this instrument.

None

ICV = initial calibration verification SDG = sample delivery group

7.4 CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION (CCV)

Continuing calibration verification associated with this sample set met criteria for recovery with exceptions noted in Table 7-2.

Table 7-2 Continuing Calibration Verification Exceptions to Criteria for Recovery

SDG Method CCV Exception Comments/Samples

Affected Action M0L0578 8260 S0L0129-CCV1

(6M169008.D) Chloroethane recovery result was low.

Chloroethane was not reported on this instrument.

None

CCV = continuing calibration verification SDG = sample delivery group

7.5 LABORATORY BLANK

The laboratory method blanks results associated with this sample set met criteria.

7.6 FIELD OR TRIP BLANK

The field blank results associated with this sample set met criteria.

7.7 INTERNAL STANDARD (IS)

Internal standard results were acceptable, with exceptions noted in Table 7-3.

Table 7-3 Exceptions to Initial Standard Results SDG Method IS Exception Samples Affected Action

M0L0578 6020 All Zero (0) recovery Calibration Blank S0L0200-CCB6 None IS = internal standard SDG = sample delivery group

5-8 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

7.8 SURROGATES

Surrogates were added to each sample, blank, and standard for volatile analysis by Method 8260. Recovery results were acceptable with exceptions noted in Table 7-4.

Table 7-4 Exceptions to Recovery Results for Surrogates SDG Method Surrogate Exception Samples Affected Action

M0L0578 8270 2,4,6-Tribromophenol

Elevated recovery

Acid compounds were not targets and target compounds were not detected

None

SDG = sample delivery group

7.9 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE (LCS)

LCS results associated with this sample set met recovery criteria with exceptions noted in Table 7-5.

Table 7-5 Exceptions to Laboratory Control Sample Recovery Criteria

SDG Method LCS/LCSD Exception Samples Affected/

Comments Action M0L0578 8270 B0L0797-BS1

(5M84845.D) Target compound recovery results were elevated.

No target compounds were detected in the associated samples.

None

LCS = laboratory control sample LCSD = laboratory control sample duplicate SDG = sample delivery group

7.10 MATRIX SPIKE (MS)/ MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE (MSD) ANALYSIS

Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate analyses associated with this sample set met criteria, with exceptions noted in Table 7-6.

Table 7-6 Exceptions to Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Analyses

SDG Method MS/MSD Exception Samples Affected/

Comments Action M0L0578 8260 B0L0831-MS1

(17M0297103.D) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene recovery result was low.

The native sample concentration was greater than 4 times the spike concentration.

None

M0L0578 8260 B0L0831-MSD1 (17M0297105.D)

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene recovery result was low.

The native sample concentration was greater than 4 times the spike concentration.

None

M0L0578 8270 B0L0797-MS1 (5M84854.D)

1,2-Dichlorobenzene, 1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-Methylnaphthalene, bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether, and Naphthalene recovery results were elevated

Parent sample results for these compounds were non-detects.

None

5-9 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

Table 7-6 Exceptions to Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate Analyses (continued)

SDG Method MS/MSD Exception Samples Affected/

Comments Action M0L0578 8270 B0L0797-

MSD1 (5M84855.D)

1,2-Dichlorobenzene, 1-Methylnaphthalene, 2-Methylnaphthalene, bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether, and Naphthalene recovery results were elevated


None

M0L0578 8270 B0L0797-MSD1 (5M84855.D)

1,2-Dichlorobenzene and bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether had elevated RPD


None

MS = matrix spike MSD = matrix spike duplicate RPD = relative percent difference SDG = sample delivery group

7.11 DILUTION TEST (SERIAL DILUTION)

Serial dilution results associated with this sample set met criteria or the native sample did not meet the concentration criteria for evaluation.

7.12 FIELD DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

One field duplicate was collected during this sampling event. For results greater than five times the LOQ in both the primary sample and field duplicate sample, a maximum RPD of 30% was required for water samples. If either the parent or field duplicate sample result was less than 5 time the LOQ, the absolute difference was compared to the LOQ for water samples. All field duplicates met the listed requirements. Detected target analytes in the field duplicate sample and the corresponding calculated measurement performance criteria are summarized in Table 7-7.

Table 7-7 Field Duplicates

Analyte

OU3-MW101S-

01 LOQ 5x

LOQ

OU3-MW101S-01-DUP

LOQ FD

5x LOQ FD RPD Delta SDG

Qual Code

Arsenic 0.00119 0.002 0.01 0.00127 0.002 0.01 6.50 0.00008 M0L0578 --- LOQ = limit of quantification DUP = duplicate FD = field duplicate RPD = relative percent difference SDG = sample delivery group

8. DATA REPORTING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

All results were based on undiluted analysis of the samples. Refer to Tables 1-1 and 7-7 for summaries of samples associated with this report. The reported concentrations for non-detect results met project action and project quantitation limits.

5-10 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

9. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

ASL evaluated a total of 113 data records from field samples during the validation. Qualified data are presented in Table 9-1.

Table 9-1 Qualified Data

Delivery Group

Field Sample ID Compound Result Units

Lab

Qualifier

Validation Q

ualifier

Validation

Reason C

ode

None ID = identification Compounds reported as non-detect were qualified as “U” by the data reviewer. Concentrations between the DL and LOQ had the laboratory “J” qualifier retained by the data reviewer. Overall the data was of suitable quality for its intended purpose and met the required project measurement performance criteria related to precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and completeness parameters with the exceptions noted in Section 7. Each of these measures and specific data qualifications are discussed below. Precision: Precision is a measure of the agreement between duplicate sample measurements of the same quantity and is reflected in RPD between spikes and the RPD for the field duplicate analysis. Accuracy: Accuracy is measured by the results from the recovery of known amounts of compounds or elements from laboratory control samples (LCS), matrix spikes (MS), and surrogate recoveries. Representativeness: The measures of representativeness – sample handling, analytical blank analysis were met. Designated analytical protocols were followed. Holding times were met for the analysis. Overall, no issues with representativeness were identified resulting from analytical failure. Comparability: The samples were analyzed using appropriate approved methods of analysis. All data results were reported correctly and in standard units. Completeness: Completeness is the amount of valid data compared to the planned amount and is expressed as a percent of the usable data points divided by the total number of analytes for each parameter analyzed. Out of a total of 113 data records, no data were rejected, resulting in a completeness of 100 %.

10. REFERENCES

Department of Defense (DoD), November 2019 (Revision 1). General Data Validation Guidelines. DoD, May 2020. Data Validation Procedure for Organic Analysis by GC/MS DoD and Department of Energy, May 2019. (Version 5.3) Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Energy (DOE)Consolidated Quality Systems Manual (QSM) for Environmental Laboratories. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), December 1996a (Revision B). Method 8260, Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry.

5-11 M3010.1634.0301.09 2/4/21

EPA, December 1996b (Revision C). Method 8270, Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). EPA, July 2014 (Revision B). Method 6020, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. EPA, November 2002. Guidance on Environmental Data Verification and Data Validation. EPA, January 2009. Guidance for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory Analytical Data for Superfund Use. EPA, January 2017. National Functional Guidelines for Organic Superfund Methods Data Review (EPA-540-R-2017-002).

Attachment 6

Validated Analytical Result Forms

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

FORM I




Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS

M0L0578-01

Client ID: EB-09 12/07/2020 10:15

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/08/2020 19:38

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169022.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 19:38






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250






0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500







DL: Detection Limit







158 Starlite Drive | Marietta, OH 45750 | 800.373.4071 | www.microbac.com

Page 195 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUUUUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-1 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-01RE1

Client ID: EB-09 12/07/2020 10:15

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/10/2020 14:05

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS11

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20L0005

11M41566.D

B0L0587 / S0L0176

12/10/2020 14:05









DL: Detection Limit








Page 196 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

U

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-2 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-02

Client ID: MW-780-2 12/07/2020 11:04

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 21:48

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297127.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 21:48






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250


0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-59-2 0.250 J0.277





0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500







DL: Detection Limit









Page 197 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUUUJUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-3 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-03

Client ID: OU3-MW101S-01 12/07/2020 12:06

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 22:17

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297129.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 22:17






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250







0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500







DL: Detection Limit








Page 198 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUUUUUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-4 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-04

Client ID: OU3-MW101S-01-DUP 12/07/2020 12:06

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/08/2020 23:49

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169034.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 23:49






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250






0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500







DL: Detection Limit








Page 199 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUUUUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-5 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-04RE1


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/10/2020 14:43

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS11

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20L0005

11M41567.D

B0L0587 / S0L0176

12/10/2020 14:43









DL: Detection Limit








Page 200 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

U

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-6 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-05

Client ID: MW-780-1 12/07/2020 11:08

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 19:54

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS17

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

jds

20L0008

17M0297119.D

B0L0831 / S0L0252

12/14/2020 19:54



0.2501,1-Dichloroethane 0.50075-34-3 0.12518.9

1.001,1-Dichloroethene 2.0075-35-4 0.5002.20

0.2501,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50095-50-1 0.125 J0.337

0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 J0.285

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 J0.307

1.00Chloroethane (Ethyl chloride) 2.0075-00-3 0.50010.6

0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-59-2 0.250102



0.500trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00156-60-5 0.250 J0.467


0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.25021.4







DL: Detection Limit









Page 201 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

U

JJJ

UUJU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-7 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-06

Client ID: TB-12072020 12/07/2020 11:08

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/08/2020 19:17

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS6

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20K0023

6M169021.D

B0L0404 / S0L0129

12/08/2020 19:17






0.250Benzene 0.50071-43-2 0.125 U0.250

0.250Chlorobenzene 0.500108-90-7 0.125 U0.250






0.500Vinyl chloride 1.0075-01-4 0.250 U0.500







DL: Detection Limit








Page 202 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUUUUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-8 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-06RE1

Client ID: TB-12072020 12/07/2020 11:08

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/10/2020 13:30

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS11

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8260B

EPA 5030C

EEA

20L0005

11M41565.D

B0L0587 / S0L0176

12/10/2020 13:30









DL: Detection Limit








Page 203 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

U

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-9 2/4/21


FORM I




Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS

M0L0578-01

Client ID: EB-09 12/07/2020 10:15

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 17:00

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84849.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/15/2020 20:12







0.426Naphthalene 0.85191-20-3 0.213 U0.426 Q2



102 % Rec35-114Nitrobenzene-d5


101 % Rec43-1162-Fluorobiphenyl

129 % Rec10-1232,4,6-Tribromophenol S1*



DL: Detection Limit




S1: Surrogate recovery is above acceptance limits.








Page 16 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-10 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-02

Client ID: MW-780-2 12/07/2020 11:04

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 17:00

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84850.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/15/2020 20:42







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2









DL: Detection Limit











Page 17 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-11 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-03

Client ID: OU3-MW101S-01 12/07/2020 12:06

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 17:00

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84851.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/15/2020 21:13







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2









DL: Detection Limit











Page 18 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-12 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-04


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 17:00

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84852.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/15/2020 21:44







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2


85.1 % Rec33-141p-Terphenyl-d14







DL: Detection Limit











Page 19 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-13 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-05

Client ID: MW-780-1 12/07/2020 11:08

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/14/2020 17:00

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: HPMS5

Aqueous

ug/L

EPA 8270C

EPA 3510C

SCB

20L0004

5M84853.D

B0L0797 / S0L0291

12/15/2020 22:14







0.400Naphthalene 0.80091-20-3 0.200 U0.400 Q2









DL: Detection Limit











Page 20 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ

UUUUUU

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-14 2/4/21


FORM I




Metals Total by ICPMS

M0L0578-01

Client ID: EB-09 12/07/2020 10:15

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/09/2020 06:31

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-060

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 09:56


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.000500 U0.00100


DL: Detection Limit








Page 665 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ Code

U

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-15 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-02

Client ID: MW-780-2 12/07/2020 11:04

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/09/2020 06:31

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-061

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 09:59


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.0005000.0400


DL: Detection Limit






Page 666 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ Code

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-16 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-03

Client ID: OU3-MW101S-01 12/07/2020 12:06

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/09/2020 06:31

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-062

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 10:02


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.000500 J0.00119


DL: Detection Limit







Page 667 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ Code

JRLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-17 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-04


Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/09/2020 06:31

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-067

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 10:17


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.000500 J0.00127


DL: Detection Limit







Page 668 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ Code

JRLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-18 2/4/21


FORM I





M0L0578-05

Client ID: MW-780-1 12/07/2020 11:08

Laboratory ID:

Collection Date:

1

12/09/2020 06:31

Matrix:

Batch / Sequence:

Units:

Dilution:Analyst:

Analytical Method:

Prep Method:

File ID:

Analyzed:

Calibration:

Prep Date:

Instrument: ICP-MS2

Aqueous

mg/L

EPA 6020

EPA 3015A

JYH

UNASSIGNED

120920a.txt-057

B0L0466 / S0L0200

12/09/2020 09:47


0.00100Arsenic 0.002007440-38-2 0.0005000.00348


DL: Detection Limit






Page 669 of 938

Table of Contents

RQ Code

RLV 01142021

M3010.1634.0301.09 6-19 2/4/21

February 17, 2021 Jacksonville, Florida 32212

Documents

Transcript of February 17, 2021 Jacksonville, Florida 32212