2014 – 2024 Capital Market Transformation Plan Capital Market Master Plan Committee.
Facility Master Plan Update: 2018 - Fort Bend ISD 1...7. Facilities Master Plan Charge of the...
Transcript of Facility Master Plan Update: 2018 - Fort Bend ISD 1...7. Facilities Master Plan Charge of the...
Facility Master Plan Update: 2018Steering Committee Meeting #1January 25, 2018
2
Facilities Master Plan Charles Dupre – Superintendent, FBISD Tracy Richter – President, Cooperative Strategies Scott Leopold – Partner, Cooperative Strategies Alex Boyer – GIS Analyst Cooperative Strategies Beth Martinez – Chief of Staff, FBISD Alice Ledford – Executive Director, Strategic Planning, FBISD
W E L C O M E
2
3
Facilities Master PlanWelcome - Dr. Charles Dupre Your Planning Team Steering Committee Members
Process and Timeline Committee Protocol
Output from Futures Conference Review Past Master Plan ActionsWhat got funded, what didn’t and why?
Background Data Introduction to Educational Framework Small Group Activity Adjourn
A G E N DA
3
4
Facilities Master Plan Roles and Responsibilities Cooperative Strategies (Scott & Alex): will facilitate all
meetings, gather and compile background data, and will present options and recommendations to the public and the Board of Trustees throughout the process. FBISD Staff: Beth and Alice are the primary district contacts
for this process, they will help to coordinate meetings and provide data to the consultants and the committee. Board of Trustees: The Board will be provided with periodic
updates throughout the process and will ultimately discuss, possibly adjust, and approve recommendations from this committee
YO U R P L A N N I N G T E A M
4
5
Facilities Master Plan
P L A N N I N G P R O C E S S
5
6
Facilities Master Plan Roles and Responsibilities Attend all Steering Committee Meetings; Review materials between meetings in an effort to
continue collaborative thought and provide ongoing insight to associated committee members; Attend and facilitate conversations during community
meetings to engage the larger community and collect feedback to inform the work of the Committee; and,Work collaboratively as a member of the Steering
Committee focusing on the development of the options and recommendations resulting in an update to the Facilities Master Plan for Board consideration
C O M M I T T E E P R OTO C O L
6
7
Facilities Master Plan Charge of the Committee The is a Board of Trustees advisory committee. The consultants will be providing preliminary options for
you to evaluate and provide your feedback. The final decisions on any facility planning actions will take
place at the Trustee Level Committee Meetings are Open to the Public If there any non-committee members present, we ask that
you respect the role of the committee and provide you feedback or concerns to the appropriate committee member outside of group discussion.
C O M M I T T E E P R OTO C O L
7
8
Facilities Master Plan
T I M E L I N E
8
COMMITTEE MEETINGSDate Time Location
January 25 6:00-9:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, 16431 Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land
February 8 6:00-9:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, 16431 Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land
March 1 6:00-9:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, 16431 Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land
April 18 6:00-9:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, 16431 Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land
April 26 6:00-9:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, 16431 Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land
COMMUNITY MEETINGSDate Time Location
Feb. 20 & 22
7:00-9:00 p.m.
Feb. 20 Ridge Point High School, 500 Waters Lake Blvd., Missouri City
Feb. 22 Travis High School, 11111 Harlem Road, Richmond
April 3, 4, 10, & 11
7:00-9:00 p.m.
April 3 Travis High School, 11111 Harlem Road, Richmond
April 4 Marshall High School, 1220 Buffalo Run, Missouri City
April 10 Elkins High School, 7007 Knights Court, Missouri City
April 11 Location TBD
9
Facilities Master Plan Continue the successes made possible by the 2014 Bond. Support “The Profile of a Graduate” Develop packages of master planning actions, collect
feedback, and make recommendations to the Board of Trustees.What is a Master Planning Action? New School Addition Repurpose Consolidation Consider Program Change Consider Boundary Change
P U R P O S E O F T H E F M P U P DAT E
9
Utilization imbalance at the high school level. School Choice (Charter, Private, Parochial, etc.)Maintaining feeder alignment Facilities continuing to age over time
10
C H A L L E N G E S
Profile of the Graduate: FBISD exists to inspire and equip ALL students to pursue futures beyond what they can imagine.
A Fort Bend ISD Graduate has a rigorous academic foundation, strong character, and is…
…equipped with skills for life.…a servant leader.…an effective communicator.…a critical thinker.…a compassionate citizen.…a collaborative team member.…a life-long learner.
11
12
FUTURES CONFERENCE OUTPUT
…to the FUTURE
12
Think about the Profile of the Graduate-….and Bricks & Mortar
What do you believe should be included into this Updated Facilities Master Plan that will best serve the students, staff and community of Fort Bend ISD.
13
FUTURES CONFERENCE OUTPUT
…to the FUTURE
13
• Flexible and adaptable spaces
• Flexibility in programming and meeting students’ needs
• Technology integration
• Equitable facility quality
• Access to nature and natural light
14
Facilities Master Plan FBISD passed a $484,000,000 capital improvement
referendum. Funded the construction of 5 facilities and 6 additions Improvements at 86 facilities
Recommendation of a Feeder Alignment Process which took place in 2014-15, and then was updated in 2016-17.
R E S U LT S O F 2 0 1 3 F M P
14
15
Facilities Master PlanR E S U LT S O F 2 0 1 3 F M P
15
New School-Legend
Additions-Major Renovations-Minor Renovations-
66853
16
Facilities Master Plan Facility CapacityWe included both the permanent capacity and the
capacity including T-buildings for each campus. CS is conducting a Facility Utilization Study at all of the
high schools to determine the feasibility of expanding capacity through changes to the programs. Will be completed by SC#3.
Facility Condition PBK architects are completing a facilities assessment that
will provide deficiency and Facility Condition Index Data for Each Campus.
B A C KG R O U N D DATA
16
17
Facilities Master Plan Enrollment Population and Survey Analysis [PASA] is providing
updated 10-year enrollment projections by school to the Board in February.
Policy – FC Local Defines Capacity and UtilizationMaintain feeder patterns Utilization should be between 80 % - 120% Annual Enrollment Review
B A C KG R O U N D DATA
17
18
Facilities Master Plan
E L E M E N TA RY U T I L I Z AT I O N
18
Under Utilized <80%-Legend
Target Zone 80% - 120%-Over Utilized >120%-
19
Facilities Master Plan
E L E M E N TA RY U T I L I Z AT I O N
19
Under Utilized <80%-Legend
Target Zone 80% - 120%-Over Utilized >120%-
With Temporary Buildings
20
Facilities Master Plan
M I D D L E S C H O O L U T I L I Z AT I O N
20
Under Utilized <80%-Legend
Target Zone 80% - 120%-Over Utilized >120%-
21
Facilities Master Plan
M I D D L E S C H O O L U T I L I Z AT I O N
21
Under Utilized <80%-Legend
Target Zone 80% - 120%-Over Utilized >120%-
With Temporary Buildings
22
Facilities Master Plan
H I G H S C H O O L U T I L I Z AT I O N
22
Under Utilized <80%-Legend
Target Zone 80% - 120%-Over Utilized >120%-
23
Facilities Master Plan
H I G H S C H O O L U T I L I Z AT I O N
23
Under Utilized <80%-Legend
Target Zone 80% - 120%-Over Utilized >120%-
24
Facilities Master Plan
H O W D O E S T H I S T I E TO G E T H E R W I T H C O N D I T I O N
24
Adams
Amity
Collister
Cynthia Mann
Garfield
Grace Jordan
Hawthorne
Hidden Springs
Highlands
Hillcrest
Horizon
Jefferson
Koelsch
Liberty
Longfellow
Lowell
Maple Grove
Monroe
Morley Nelson
Mountain View
Owyhee
Pierce Park
Riverside
Roosevelt
Shadow Hills
Trailwind
Valley View
W.H. Taft
Washington
White Pine
Whitney
Whittier
0%
20%
40%
60%
0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 125.0% 150.0%
FACI
LITY
CO
NDI
TIO
N IN
DEX
FACILITY UTILIZATION PERCENTANGE
Facility Condition Index Versus Utilization - Elementary Schools FBISD data to come
25
Facilities Master Plan February 20 & 22We are going to the community again to discuss
Educational Framework topics. This is a high level discussion that we will use to define the
envelop that we want to operate within for planning. We did this before in 2013, has public opinion or
perception changed?
E D U C AT I O N A L F R A M E W O R K
25
26
Facilities Master Plan
E D U C AT I O N A L F R A M E W O R K
26
Elkins Group*
Travis Group*
Elkins Individual
Travis Individual
A B C Web OnlyIndividual + Web Total
Less than 1,200 students (less than 300 students per grade) 0 0 8 6 25 32 8 50 129
1,200-1,600 students (301-400 students per grade) 1 2 16 16 46 52 27 86 246
1,601-2,000 students (401-500 students per grade) 7 4 40 21 76 111 39 148 446
2,001-2,400 students (501-600 students per grade) 13 8 46 39 105 123 33 160 527
2,401-2,800 students (601-700 students per grade) 4 4 25 17 46 54 20 72 242
More than 2,800 students (more than 700 students per grade) 0 1 5 10 16 18 4 26 80
Other (if needed) 0 1 2 2 8 8 2 13 36
Community Dialogue Results Planning Areas (Individual + Web)
Question from 2013 Questionnaire What is the ideal High School Size?
27
QUESTIONS ABOUT PROCESS
…to the FUTURE
27
28
SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION
…to the FUTURE
28
Based on your knowledge or the District and the information you saw tonight, please reflect and discuss the biggest challenges you foresee in this process.
29
NEXT STEPS
…to the FUTURE
29
Homework: Review the Results from the 2013 Educational Framework community Dialogue:1. Are there any questions we don’t need to ask
again?2. Are there any questions we need to change or
restructure?3. Are they any questions that are totally new that
we should as?
30
NEXT MEETING
…to the FUTURE
30
Next Meeting: February 8th