Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center BESAC...
-
Upload
collin-rodgers -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center BESAC...
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
BESAC Sub-Panel Review of IPNS
and LANSCE/LUJAN
Facility Evaluation
Andrew Taylor
Washington DC11 December 2000
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Context
“The most important thing these facilities can do is to run reliably, build a user base, and do good science” -- Thom Mason, SNS
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
International Benchmark
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
ISIS Science
ISIS 2000www.isis.rl.ac.uk
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
ISIS Source
• Source 160 kW• Operation 168 days / year • 91% Reliability• 687 mA-hr delivered
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
ISIS Science
F i g u r e 2 . 1 I S I S I n s t r u m e n t D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m m e
1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1
T O S C A P h a s e I
M A P S
G E M C o m m i s s i o n i n g
P r i s m a G u i d e
T O S C A P h a s e I I
V E S U V I O
O S I R I S I I
H R P D I I
S X D I I
E N G I N X
2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3
I n s t r u m e n t D e v e l o p m e n t
User Community 1200 +
Experiments / year 600 +
Publications / year 400 +
$80 k per paper
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Sourcex
Reliabilityx
Instrumentationx
Support Facilitiesx
Support Staffx
User Communityx
Cost Effectivenessx
Stewardship
Impact
User Facility Effectiveness
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Grading Scale
Outstanding
++Competitive
+Needs Improvement
to be Competitive
-Unacceptable
--
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Source . .
Reliability . .
Instrumentation . .
Support Facilities . .
Support Staff . .
User Community . .
Cost Effectiveness - Operations . . - Science . .
Stewardship/Management . .
Impact . .
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
LANSCE Source: +
Target 2
Target 4
Target 1
ER-2ER-1
1234
5
6
79 1
011B
1213141516
11A
Lujan Center
80 kW -- 100 µA at 20 Hz
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Source: -
7 kW -- 14 µA at 20 Hz
U235 target x 2Solid Methane x 3.5
15 kW Thermal / Epithermal 50 kW Cold
Dedicated Facility
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
LANSCE/Lujan Reliability: -
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Linac
Lujan BDS
Target 1
Neutrons
Poor Statis tics
YTD
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Lujan Reliability
2000 YTD
1999
1996
19951988-1992
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
S ys te m
2000 YTD
1999
1996
1995
1988-1992
Taking a Systematic approachbutAgeing systems need investment
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Reliability: + +
IPNS Accelerator System Performance
0
20
40
60
80
100
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Calendar Year
Rel
iabili
ty in
Per
cent (◊
)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
Cu
rre
nt
in M
icro
am
ps
(■
)
FY-97 96.1% FY-98 97.6% FY-99 94.4% FY-00 95.6% FY-01 96.5%
1995-2001 (RUN SUMMARIES)November 20, 2000
FY-97 14.19µA FY-98 14.44µA FY-99 14.25µA FY-00 14.52µA FY-01 14.33µA
Outstanding -- for now !
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Comparison
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
687
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Lujan Instrumentation: -
20 m0 m
1 square =1 m
HIPD
SCDFDS
NPD
LQD
PHAROS
SPEAR
CNR
Instrument Suite -- 6/7Good in PartsInstruments in User Program - 3
World Ranking
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Lujan Successes
NPD Advanced Engineering Materials
Diffraction from NiTi under load.
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Lujan Problems
PHAROS
MAPS
LANSCE should be competitive with ISIS
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Making MAPS
ofMagnetism
first science from the new ISIS spectrometer
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
New Science at ISIS
Broholm et al
Mook et al
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
USA at ISIS
USA % time at ISIS
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9Requested
Allocated
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Instrumentation: -
- Well balanced Instrument Suite
- Useful Research Tools
- Despite severe under investment
World Class Science
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS - World Class Science
AFM (z) FM (z)
Type-C (y)
FM (xy) Type-A (xy)
Type-C* (y) Type-G (xy-z) Type-G (z)
tilting canting
tiltingpolytypism
_
Magnetic structures in the CMR manganites: the pseudo-2D system La2-2xSr1+2xMn2O7C. D. Ling, J. E. Millburn, J. F. Mitchell, D. N. Argyriou, J. Linton, H. N. Bordallo, Phys. Rev. B 62, xxxx (1 Dec 2000)
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Developments
eg QENS x 10 for $700k
Much potential….
Testbed for SNS
Highly cost effective
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Lujan Support Facilities: -
IPNS Support Facilities: -
•Ranked well by user community
•Needs improvement
•Benefits from MSD infrastructure
•Significant under-investment
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Lujan Support Staff: +
IPNS Support Staff: +
•Dedicated and committed
•Accelerator understaffed
•3.9 staff / instrument ~ISIS
•Dedicated and committed
•Accelerator understaffed
•2.7 staff / instrument < ISIS
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Lujan Users: +
Significant potential
Enthusiastic despite setbacks
SDT concept successful in involving UC Campuses
Exploded view of HIPPO
150°
90°
40° 20°
10°
1384 detectors
4.6 m2
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
World Class Instruments
GEM
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Users: +
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Average citations per paper
•Internal Program in MSD - Outstanding Quality
•Strong commitment at all levels in the organisation to the concept of a User Facility
•Enhancement plan to develop the user base
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
LANSCE / Lujan
Cost EffectivenessOperations (marginal): -Operations (average) : - -
Cost EffectivenessScience (marginal): +Science (average) : -
see table
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS
Cost EffectivenessOperations: + +
Cost EffectivenessScience: +
see table
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Figures of Merit
LANSCE IPNS ISIS
FIGURE OF MERIT 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Benchmark
Total Costs ($M)BES 6.1 5.1 6.1 5.6 10.6 11.9 13.2 13.6Other 40.5 42.3 48.5 55.1 0 0 0 0Total* 46.6 47.4 54.6 60.7 10.6 11.9 13.2 13.6 34Average+ 23.3 23.7 27.3 30.3 NA NA NA NA
User Beam TimeScheduled (days) 150 0 108 39 164 175 179 175 168Delivered (days) 135 0 30 31 157 171 163 167 153Efficiency 90% 0% 28% 79% 96% 98% 91% 95% 91%
Cost Per FacilityDay ($K)
Marginal Cost (BES) 45.2 NA 203 181 68 70 81 81 NAAverage Cost 173 NA 910 977 68 70 81 81 222
Number ofScheduledInstruments
7 NA 6 3 12 12 12 12 18
Cost Per InstrumentDay ($K)
Marginal Cost (BES) 6.5 NA 40.7 60.2 5.6 5.8 6.8 6.8 NAAverage Cost 24.7 NA 182 326 5.6 5.8 6.8 6.8 12
Facility Output:Number ofRefereedPublications
57 60 72 NA 119 113 155 NA 428
Cost Per Paper ($K)Marginal Cost (BES) 107 85 85 NA 89 105 85 NA NAAverage Cost 409 395 379 NA 89 105 85 NA 79
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
LANSCE Stewardship: - -
Performance far below potential
Grossly inadequate Lujan Operation
No correlation between articulated priorities and funding flow
Lack of focus - over a prolonged period of time - and still ongoing
Multiple sponsors - no single champion
No clearly identified action plan at the highest levels in LANL and in DOE
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Stewardship: +
•Well integrated team
•Internationally acclaimed
•Committed to running a user facility
•Enthusiastically embracing SNS
Truly Outstanding
but
Let down by lack of support by DOE
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
LANSCE/Lujan Impact: -
Modest impact compared with resources
Overshadowed by IPNS
But
Broad range of Competencies on the Mesa
t = 0 18.33 s19.41 s17.26 s
20.48 s 21.55 s 22.63 s 23.70 s
GENIE PRAD
Lujan has great potential…. …..for both internal + external programs
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Impact: +
Reservoir of expertise
Track record of seminal developments second to none
High international stranding of staff in both IPNS and MSD
Outreach to build a community particularly praiseworthy
but
Impact moderated by source strength and lack of investments in instrumentation
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
LANSCE/Lujan Summary
Potential to be a world ranking user facility
Latent user community - both internally and in the UC Campuses
Staff on the Lujan floor and in the SDTs show promise
Evidence of commitment at all levels
but
Lack of integration renders this ineffective
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
IPNS Summary
Outstanding value
Impressively well integrated team keeps an outmoded source operational at the highest levels of efficiency
Can be sustained and enhanced -- with modest investments
Plan for cost effective upgrades identified
Window of opportunity to pass on expertise to a new generation
Committed to success at all levels
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
Source + -
Reliability - ++
Instrumentation - -
Support Facilities - -
Support Staff + +
User Community + +
Cost Effectiveness - Operations - - + +
- Science - +
Stewardship/Management - - +
Impact - +
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
LANSCE/Lujan Evaluation
Source .
Reliability .
Instrumentation .
Support Facilities .
Support Staff .
User Community .
Cost Effectiveness - Operations . - Science .
Stewardship/Management .
Impact .
Facility Evaluation Andrew Taylor
BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center
I P N S Evaluation
Source .
Reliability .
Instrumentation .
Support Facilities .
Support Staff .
User Community .
Cost Effectiveness - Operations . - Science .
Stewardship/Management .
Impact .