F. Minato A , S. Chiba A , K. Hagino B
description
Transcript of F. Minato A , S. Chiba A , K. Hagino B
F. MinatoA, S. ChibaA, K. HaginoB
A. Japan Atomic Energy AgencyB. Tohoku Univ.
Fission barrier of uranium including Λ hyperon
Nucl.Phys.A831, 150 (2009) Nucl. Phys. A856, 55 (2011)
1. Λ impurity effects2.Motivation 3. fission barrier & density distribution4. Summary
Table of Contents
Λ Impurity effect
H. Tamura et al., NPA 754, 58(2005)
• Levelexperiment
T. Motoba et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, (1983) 189.E. Hiyama et al., Phys. Rev. C 59, (1999) 2351.
αp
n
Rcore-(np)de
nsity
dist
ributi
on
• Shrinkage
Rcore-(np)
6Li
cluster model
peak at E= 12.8 MeV
Dipole motion of 18ΛΛO
FM&KH, Physical Review C 85, 024316 (2012)
Λ [1p(1s)-1] 80 %n&p [1d5/2(1p3/2)-1] 20%
Λ Impurity effect RPA with degree of freedom of Λ
1) production of Λ in nuclei
High energy is released in production & decay of Λ
Fragment distribution after Λ weak decay in 138
53I
change of “final” fission yield
⇒ promote Fission & destruction of Fission Product
Λ + N N + N + 190 MeVK- + 238U 239ΛU + π- + 178 MeV
2) decay of Λ in nuclei
Motivation What is impurity effect like in Λ hyper-actinide?
Λ life-time ~10-10 sec
Fission of Hyper-uranium
T.A.Armstrong, J.P.Bocquet, G.Ericsson, et al. Phys. Rev. C 47, 1957 (1993).
H.J. Krappe and V.V. Pashkevich, Phys. Rev. C 47, 1970 (1993).
F.F. Karpeshin, C.G. Koutroulos, M.E. Grypeos, Nucl. Phys. A595, 209 (1995).
H.J. Krappe and V.V. Pashkevich, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1025 (1996).
Theory
Fission barrier of Hypernuclei ??
Experiment
heavy fragment
Λ-att
achm
ent
prob
abili
ty
light fragment
M. Rayet, Nucl. Phys. A367 (1981) 381
◆ΛN interaction
Skyrme-Hartree-Fock
◆ΛΛ interaction
2. quadrupole constraint
1. reflection asymmetry
Skyrme-type interaction for ΛN & ΛΛ interaction
zr
9 parameters: t0Λ, x0
Λ, t1Λ, t2
Λ, t3Λ, λ0, λ1, λ2, λ3
Lanskoy PRC58, 3351(1998)
SkM* parameter setNN interaction:
λ0 (MeV fm3)
λ1 (MeV fm5)
range μ (fm)
SΛΛ1 -312.6 57.5 0.61
SΛΛ3 -831.8 922.9 1.49
1. ΔBΛΛ(13BΛΛ) = 4.8 or 0.6 MeV2. λ2=λ3 = 0
ΛΛ :
Skyrme-Hartree-Fock
ΛN :
Y. Yamamoto, H. Bando, and J. Zofka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 80, (1988) 757.
1. B.E. of 5ΛHe and 209
ΛPb 2. m*
Λ/mΛ =0.8 in nuclear matter 3. energy difference between 0+ and 1+ of 4
ΛHe4. W0
Λ=0
Λ bond energy ΔBΛΛ=BΛΛ-2BΛ
YBZ4 set: t0Λ=-315.3, t1
Λ=23.14, t2Λ=-23.14, t3
Λ=2000, x0Λ=-0.109
range of “equivalent” single gaussian potential
Lanskoy PRC58, 3351(1998)
cf. FM & SC Nucl. Phys. A856, 55 (2011)
↑0.53
0.27↑
Fission barrier height
0.61-0.63↑
↑0.91-1.03
x 2
Result
single-Λ 239ΛU double-Λ 240
ΛΛU
Core Energy Λ Energy
0.25
Change of Core EnergySMALL
Energy of Λ particle increases due to transfer to fragment with smaller mass
0.5
Why Increase of Bf?
238U 239
ΛU
ground state outer barrier Q2=200 barn
Λ particle moves to heavier fragment
Density distribution of 239ΛU
Density distribution of 240ΛΛU
FM & SC Nucl. Phys. A856, 55 (2011)
CORE
Λ(SΛΛ1)range
μ=0.61fm
Λ(SΛΛ3)range
μ=1.61fm
ground state Q2=200 barn
SUMMARY
Inner Bf : 0.27 MeV↑Outer Bf : 0.50 MeV↑
Λ particle(s) move to heavier fragment in adiabatic approximation
Calculate Fission Barrier height & density distribution of 239
ΛU, 240ΛΛU
with Skyrme-Hartree-Fock approach◆Fission barrier height
Inner Bf : 0.61~0.63 MeV↑Outer Bf : 0.91~1.03 MeV↑
Barrier height is increased
◆Density distribution