Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

6
Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010

Transcript of Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

Page 1: Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study

June 2010

Page 2: Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

Exposure Reconstruction

• Defines common exposure subgroups• Quantifies exposures for subgroups• If there is an excess, then seeks

association between exposures and effects

• If there is no excess effect, exposure reconstruction however refined will not associate an agent with an effect or explain an effect

UIC 2010

Page 3: Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

Exposure Reconstruction

• Performed on:– Parts manufactured– Processes used to manufacture parts– Individual agents

• Part and process analyzed to ensure any unsuspected agent that may be associated with a possible effect would not be missed

UIC 2010

Page 4: Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

Individually Examined Contaminants

• Cohort– Evaluate mortality and

work exposures• Chromium • Cobalt • Degreasing solvents• Ionizing radiation• Lead-cadmium• Magnetic fields• Metalworking fluids (oil

& water based)• Nickel

• Case-control– Evaluate CNS incidence

and more detailed work exposures

• All of the cohort exposures as well as:

• PCB’s• Metalworking fluid

combustion products specific to North Haven

UIC 2010

Page 5: Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

Exposure Reconstruction Protocol

• Leaves no stone unturned– Considers all suspected agents– Considers all employment categories as

defined by job dictionary – Considers all significant subgroups as defined

by parts– Considers all different aspects of work as

defined by manufacturing processes involved

UIC 2010

Page 6: Exposure Reconstruction for the Epidemiologic Study June 2010.

UIC 2010

Acknowledgement

The researchers would like to thank the Communications Facilitation Workgroup, P&W employees, union, and management personnel, and the CT Department of Public Health for their continued support and contributions to the study.