Evaluating an oral presentation with slides
-
Upload
shona-whyte -
Category
Education
-
view
1.709 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Evaluating an oral presentation with slides
what makes a good presentation?
English for science teachers
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Elements to consider
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Elements to consider
Delivery
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Elements to consider
Delivery
Content
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Elements to consider
Delivery
Content
Slides
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Elements to consider
Delivery
Content
Slides
Overall Effect
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Delivery (débit)
1.VOLUME
2.PACE
3.ATTITUDE
Tuesday 2 November 2010
DELIVERY
VOLUME: TOO quiet .......... TOO LouD
Tuesday 2 November 2010
DELIVERY
VOLUME: TOO quiet .......... TOO Loud
PACE: TOO S L O W .......... TOO Fast
Tuesday 2 November 2010
DELIVERY
VOLUME: TOO quiet .......... TOO Loud
PACE: TOO S L O W .......... TOO Fast
ATTITUDE: TOO TIMID ...... TOO overbearing
Tuesday 2 November 2010
CONTENT
1.INFORMATION LOAD
2.COGNITIVE LOAD
3.ORGANISATION
Tuesday 2 November 2010
CONTENT
Tuesday 2 November 2010
CONTENT
TOO MUCH INFORMATION ... NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION
Tuesday 2 November 2010
CONTENT
TOO MUCH INFORMATION ... NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION
TOO SIMPLE ........... TOO COMPLEX
Tuesday 2 November 2010
CONTENT
TOO MUCH INFORMATION ... NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION
TOO SIMPLE ........... TOO COMPLEX
POORLY ORGANISED ....... TOO RIGIDLY ORGANISED
Tuesday 2 November 2010
SLIDES (diapos)
1.READABILITY
2.ESTHETICS
3.BALANCE
Tuesday 2 November 2010
SLIDES
Tuesday 2 November 2010
SLIDES
TOO MUCH TEXT ... NOT ENOUGH TEXT
Tuesday 2 November 2010
SLIDES
TOO MUCH TEXT ... NOT ENOUGH TEXT
NOT ENOUGH COLOUR, TOO FEW ILLUSTRATIONS ........... TOO MUCH COLOUR, TOO MANY ILLUSTRATIONS
Tuesday 2 November 2010
SLIDES
TOO MUCH TEXT ... NOT ENOUGH TEXT
NOT ENOUGH COLOUR, TOO FEW ILLUSTRATIONS ........... TOO MUCH COLOUR, TOO MANY ILLUSTRATIONS
WRITTEN AND SPOKEN TEXT TOO SIMILAR ..... WRITTEN AND SPOKEN TEXT TOO DIFFERENT
Tuesday 2 November 2010
BAD SLIDE
• This slide is boring.
• There are no illustrations.
• I read exactly what you see.
Tuesday 2 November 2010
BAD SLIDE
This slide is bad too because there is a great deal of text to read and it’s not easy to see how it is organised. If the audience reads the whole text, they will not be able to pay attention to the speaker. If the speaker reads the text aloud, they add nothing to what the audience can read by themselves. The font is too small and there is nothing to motivate the audience to make the effort to read the text and follow the speaker’s argument. As a rule of thumb, you should use a font size above 20. You should also keep text to a minimum and divide it into points to help the audience see where you are. You can add additional information orally while we look at your slide. Illustrations, when well chosen, make your slides more attractive and help the audience to focus on your main points. Your slides complement your presentation because listeners generally do not listen intently throughout your presentation. They may “tune out” from time to time, losing concentration and thinking about something else. If your slides are well designed, your audience can find the thread of your presentation again by looking at the main ideas on your slide and the illustrations. The colour scheme is fairly nasty too.
Tuesday 2 November 2010
BAD SLIDE
Tuesday 2 November 2010
BAD SLIDE
this slide is poor
Tuesday 2 November 2010
BAD SLIDE
this slide is poor
because it is too different from the others
Tuesday 2 November 2010
BAD SLIDE
this slide is poor
because it is too different from the others
and the effects are distracting
Tuesday 2 November 2010
BAD SLIDE
this slide is poor
because it is too different from the others
and the effects are distracting
Tuesday 2 November 2010
OVERALL EFFECT
1.EASY TO FOLLOW ...... DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW
2.INTERESTING TO LISTEN TO .... DULL TO
LISTEN TO
3.STRONG POINTS (don’t change) .... WEAK POINTS (TRY TO CHANGE)
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Evaluation of presentations
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Evaluation of presentations
Delivery
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Evaluation of presentations
Delivery
Content
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Evaluation of presentations
Delivery
Content
Slides
Tuesday 2 November 2010
Evaluation of presentations
Delivery
Content
Slides
Overall Effect
Tuesday 2 November 2010