Euler sums - arXiv · 2020-03-13 · Euler sums Ming Hao Zhao 2020.3.12 Abstract The main purpose...

On logarithmic integrals, harmonic sums and variations

Ming Hao Zhao

Abstract

Based on various non-MZV approaches we evaluate certain logarithmic integrals and har-

monic sums. More specifically, 85 LIs, 89 ESs, 263 PLIs, 28 non-alt QESs, 39 GESs, 26 BESs,

14 IBESs with weight ≤ 5, 193 QLIs, 172 QPLIs, 83 QESs, 7 QBESs, 3 IQBESs with weight

≤ 4. With help of MZV theory we evaluate other 10 QESs with weight ≤ 4. High weight

hypergeometric series, nonhomogeneous integrals and other results are also established.

Contents

1 Preliminaries 5

1.1 Special functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1.2 Definition of subjects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

1.2.1 LI and PLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

1.2.2 QLI and QPLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.2.3 ES and QES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.2.4 Fibonacci basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

1.3 Main results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

2 LI 11

2.1 Brute force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

2.2 General formulas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

2.3 Integration by parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2.4 Fractional transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2.5 Beta derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2.6 Contour integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

2.7 Double integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

2.8 Hypergeometric identities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

2.9 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

1

arX

iv:1

911.

1215

5v13

[m

ath.

CA

] 1

Jul

202

0

3 ES 17


3.2 Symmetric relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

3.3 Partial fractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18


3.5 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

3.5.1 Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

3.5.2 Confrontation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

4 PLI 27

4.1 Brute force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27




4.5 Complementary integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

4.6 Polylog identities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

4.7 Series expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

4.8 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

5 QLI 33

5.1 Logsine integrals and contour deformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

5.1.1 LSI, PLSI, ITF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

5.1.2 QLSI and QLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

5.2 Inverse tangent family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

5.3 Polylog special values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

5.4 Brute force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

5.4.1 Class 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

5.4.2 Class 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37


5.6 Feynman’s trick on Mellin transform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38



5.9 Power substitution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

5.10 Weierstrass substitution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

5.11 Parametric integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

5.12 Fourier expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

5.13 Beta derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

5.13.1 Class 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

5.13.2 Class 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

2


5.14.1 Class 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

5.14.2 Class 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41


5.16 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

6 QPLI 42

6.1 Brute force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42




6.5 Polylog identities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

6.6 Power substitution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

6.7 Valean’s master formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

6.7.1 Class 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

6.7.2 Class 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44


6.8.1 Class 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

6.8.2 Class 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44


6.9.1 Class 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

6.9.2 Class 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

6.10 Double integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

6.10.1 Class 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

6.10.2 Class 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

6.10.3 Class 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

6.10.4 Class 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

6.10.5 Class 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

6.11 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

7 QES 52

7.1 Non-alternating case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

7.2 Generating functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

7.3 QLI/QPLI expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

7.4 Integral representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53


7.6 Partial fractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

7.7 Symmetric relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

7.8 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

3

8 Applications 55

8.1 Nonhomogeneous integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

8.1.1 NLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

8.1.2 NPLI, NQLI, NQPLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

8.2 Nested sums and multiple log integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

8.2.1 NS manipulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

8.2.2 MLI representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

8.3 Geometric and binomial Euler sums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

8.3.1 GES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

8.3.2 BES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

8.3.3 IBES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

8.3.4 QBES, IQBES (pFq part 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

8.4 Related problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

8.4.1 Symmetric PLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

8.4.2 MT of PLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

8.4.3 Inverse ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

8.4.4 High weight ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

8.4.5 High weight PLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

8.4.6 Parseval LSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

8.4.7 Convolutional LI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

8.4.8 Valean’s hexagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73

8.4.9 Hypergeometric rhapsody (pFq part 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75

8.4.10 FL fantasia (pFq part 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

8.5 Two conjectures solved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

8.5.1 Borwein’s conjecture on binomial sum (pFq part 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

8.5.2 Au’s conjecture on general LI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

9 Table of subjects 84

9.1 LI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

9.2 ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

9.3 PLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90

9.4 QLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99

9.5 QPLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106

9.6 QES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111

9.7 GES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115

9.8 BES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

9.9 IBES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118

9.10 QBES, IQBES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118

4

10 Miscellaneous 119

10.1 LSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

10.2 PLSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

10.3 ITF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

10.4 QLI (W = 5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

10.5 QLSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

10.6 NLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

10.7 NPLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

10.8 NQLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

10.9 NQPLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

10.10NS, MLI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

10.11Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

11 Comments 126

1 Preliminaries

1.1 Special functions

Below are special functions used. We assume readers are aware of their basic properties [13, 14].

Gamma function: The analytic continuation of Γ(s) =∫∞

0ts−1e−tdt

Euler Beta function: The analytic continuation of B(a, b) =∫ 1

0ta−1(1− t)b−1dt = Γ(a)Γ(b)

Γ(a+b)

Polygamma function: The analytic continuation of ψ(n)(x) = ∂n+1 log(Γ(x))∂xn+1

Polylogarithm: The analytic continuation of Lin(z) =∑∞k=1

zk

kn

Riemann Zeta function: The analytic continuation of ζ(s) =∑∞k=1

1ks

Dirichlet Eta function: The analytic continuation of η(s) = (1− 21−s)ζ(s) =∑∞k=1

(−1)k−1

ks

Dirichlet Beta function: The analytic continuation of β(s) =∑∞k=0

(−1)k

(2k+1)s

Catalan constant and generalization: C = β(2),ψ(3)( 1

4 )−ψ(3)( 34 )

1536 = β(4)

Euler-Mascheroni constant: γ = −ψ(0)(1) Pochhammer symbol: (a)n = Γ(a+n)Γ(a)

5

Generalized hypergeometric function: The analytic continuation of

pFq(a1, · · · , ap; b1, · · · , bq; z) =

∞∑n=0

(a1)n · · · (ap)nzn

(b1)n · · · (bq)nn!

Clausen function: Cl2k(x) =∑∞n=1

sin(nx)n2k ,Cl2k+1(x) =

∑∞n=1

cos(nx)n2k+1

Inverse tangent integral: Tik(x) =∫ x

0Tik−1(t)

t dt,Ti1(x) = tan−1(x)

Elliptic K/E integral: K(x) =∫ π

2

01√

1−x sin2(t)dt, E(x) =

∫ π2

0

√1− x sin2(t) dt

Legendre P polynomial: Pn(x) = 1(2n)!!

∂n(x2−1)n

∂xn

1.2 Definition of subjects

Clarification: Throughout this paper, LI will be the abbreviation of log integral, PLI polylog inte-

gral, QLI quadratic log integral, QPLI quadratic polylog integral, ES Euler sum, QES quadratic

Euler sum, MZV multiple Zeta value. Minor abbreviations will be mentioned later.

1.2.1 LI and PLI

Notations:

f(0;x) = 1− x, f(1;x) = x, f(2;x) = 1 + x

l(0;x) = log(1− x), l(1;x) = log(x), l(2;x) = log(1 + x), l(3;x) = log(1 + x2), l(4;x) = tan−1(x)

L(n, 1;x) = Lin(x), L(n, 2;x) = Lin(−x), L(n, 3;x) = Lin(1− x

2), n ≥ 2

L(n, 4;x) = Lin(1 + x

2), L(n, 5;x) = Lin(

1− x1 + x

), L(n, 6;x) = Lin(x− 1

1 + x), n ≥ 2

Definition:

LI(a(0), a(1), a(2); p) =

∫ 1

0

∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)

f(p;x)dx

6

PLI(a(0), a(1), a(2); b(2, 1), · · · , b(2, 6); · · · ; b(N, 1), · · · , b(N, 6); p)

=

∫ 1

0

∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)

∏6k=1

∏Nn=2 L(n, k;x)b(n,k)

f(p;x)dx

Abbreviation: In later discussion of PLIs, N and b(n, k) will be small and many of them equal

to 0. In this case, we omit those zero parameters and simply repeat the word ’nk’ b(n, k) times for

abbreviation. For instance we have

LI(1, 2, 3; 0) =

∫ 1

0

log(1− x) log2(x) log3(x+ 1)

1− xdx

PLI(0, 0, 1; 24, 24; 32; 2) =

∫ 1

0

Li2(x+1

2

)2Li3(−x) log(x+ 1)

x+ 1dx

Weight: We define the weight W of LI, PLI as

1 +

2∑m=0

a(m), 1 +

6∑k=1

N∑n=2

nb(n, k) +

2∑m=0

a(m)

respectively, so LI(1, 2, 3; 0) is of weight 7 and PLI(0, 0, 1; 24, 24; 32; 2) weight 9.

For W ≤ 5 there are 85 convergent LIs, since a simple counting shows the total number of

weight W convergent LIs is 12

(3W 2 +W − 2

). For W ≤ 5, after excluding those already contained

in LIs, there are 263 convergent PLIs.

1.2.2 QLI and QPLI

Notations:

g(1;x) = 1− x, g(2;x) = x, g(3;x) = 1 + x, g(4;x) = 1 + x2, g(5;x) =1 + x2

x

k(1;x) = log(1− x), k(2;x) = log(x), k(3;x) = log(1 + x), k(4;x) = log(1 + x2), k(5;x) = tan−1(x)

L(n, 7;x) = Lin(−x2), L(n, 8;x) = Tin(x)

7

Definition:

QLI(A(1), A(2), A(3), A(4), A(5); p) =

∫ 1

0

∏5m=1 k(m;x)A(m)

g(p;x)dx

QPLI3(a; p) =

∫ 1

0

L(2, a;x)

g(p;x)dx,QPLI4(a; p) =

∫ 1

0

L(3, a;x)

g(p;x)dx,QPLI4(a; b; p) =

∫ 1

0

L(2, a;x)k(b;x)

g(p;x)dx

Abbreviation: In later discussion of QLIs, A(m) will be small and many of them equal to

0. In this case, we omit those zero parameters and simply repeat the word ’m’ A(m) times for

abbreviation. For instance we have

QLI(355; 5) =

∫ 1

0

x log(x+ 1) tan−1(x)2

x2 + 1dx, QLI(145; 4) =

∫ 1

0

log(1− x) log(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x)

x2 + 1dx

QPLI4(7; 3) =

∫ 1

0

Li3(−x2)

x+ 1dx,QPLI4(8; 2; 1) =

∫ 1

0

Ti2(x) log(x)

1− xdx

Weight: We define the weight W of QLI as 1 +∑5m=1A(m). QPLI3(· · · ), QPLI4(· · · ) are of

weight 3, 4 respectively. All 4 examples above are of weight 4.

For W ≤ 4, after excluding those already contained in LIs, there are 193 convergent QLIs. For

W ≤ 4, after excluding those already contained in LI/PLI/QLIs, there are 172 convergent QPLIs.

1.2.3 ES and QES

Notations:

H(k)n =

n∑j=1

1

jk, H̃

(k)n =

n∑j=1

(−1)j−1

jk, Hn = H(1)

n , H̃n = H̃(1)n

f1k(n) = H(k)n , f2k(n) = H̃

(k)n , f3k(n) = H

(k)2n

Note that H̃(k)2n won’t appear since it equals H

(k)2n − 1

2k−1H(k)n .

Definition:

8

ES(a(1), · · · , a(M),−b(1), · · · ,−b(N);±p) =

∞∑n=1

(±1)n−1

np

M∏k=1

H(a(k))n

N∏j=1

H̃(b(j))n

QES1(m1k1, · · · ,msks;±p) =

∞∑n=1

(±1)n−1

np

s∏r=1

fmrkr (n)

QES2(m1k1, · · · ,msks;±p) =

∞∑n=1

(±1)n−1

(2n+ 1)p

s∏r=1

fmrkr (n)

We may assume a(i), b(j),mrkr are non-decreasing. If there exists no H(k)n (resp. f2kr (n)) and

the outer index +p, we call an ES (resp. QES) non-alternating, otherwise alternating.

Weight: We define the weight W of ES as∑Mk=1 a(k) +

∑Nj=1 b(j) + p and QES

∑sr=1 kr + p.

For instance

ES(2,−3,−3;−4) =

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1H(2)n

(H̃

(3)n

)2

n4, QES(11, 12, 12, 32; 3) =

∞∑n=1

Hn

(H

(2)n

)2H

(2)2n

n3

are weight 12 alternating ES and weight 10 non-alternating QES, respectively.

For W ≤ 5 there are 89 convergent ESs. For W ≤ 4, after excluding those already contained

in ESs, there are 93 convergent QESs. For W = 5, after excluding those already contained in ESs,

there are 28 convergent non-alternating QESs.

1.2.4 Fibonacci basis

This part is about the structure of closed-forms.

Weight of constants: We assign weight 0 to rational numbers, 1 to π, log(2), 2 to Catalan C, 4 to

ψ(3)( 14 )−ψ(3)( 3

4 ), n to ζ(n),Lin( 12 ),</=Lin(1 + i). The weight given to product of these constants

is defined as the sum of each components’ weight, for instance 2π2Li4(

12

)ζ(3) log(2) has weight 10.

Linear relations: A linear relation is an equality of form

’rational combination of LI/PLI/QLI/QPLI/ES=certain constants’

If all items in LHS have the same weight, we call it a homogeneous relation; otherwise we call it

non-homogeneous.

9

Fibonacci basis: According to [1], all 85 LIs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by certain t(W )

weight W constants over Q, here t(1) = 1, t(2) = 2, t(3) = 3, t(4) = 5, t(5) = 8. We define the sets of

these homogeneous constants generating LIs as Fibonacci bases due to consistency between t(n) and

Fibonacci numbers Fn. This term arises from [6] but differs a little. See also [1] for higher weight LIs.

We denote AW the weight W Fibonacci basis containing t(W ) full-simplified polylog constants.

By full-simplified we mean ζ(2n), n > 0 and Lin(

12

), n < 4 won’t appear, due to simplification

formulas [13, 14]

Li2

(1

2

)=π2

12− log2(2)

2,Li3

(1

2

)=

7ζ(3)

8+

log3(2)

6− 1

12π2 log(2), ζ(2n) =

22n−1π2n |B2n|(2n)!

where Bn are Bernoulli numbers. These simplifications keeps the weight unchanged. We have [1]

A1 = {log(2)} , A2 ={π2, log2(2)

}, A3 =

{π2 log(2), log3(2), ζ(3)

}A4 =

{π4, π2 log2(2), log4(2), ζ(3) log(2),Li4

(1

2

)}A5 =

{π4 log(2), π2 log3(2), log5(2), π2ζ(3), ζ(3) log2(2), ζ(5),Li4

(1

2

)log(2),Li5

(1

2

)}

And that all LIs with W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q. A possible weight 6 representation is:

A6 ={π6, π4 log2(2), π2 log4(2), log6(2), π2ζ(3) log(2), ζ(3) log3(2), ζ(5) log(2),

ζ(3)2,Li4

(1

2

)log2(2), π2Li4

(1

2

),Li5

(1

2

)log(2),Li6

(1

2

), S

}Where the constant S = ES(1;−5) =

∑∞k=1

(−1)k−1

k5 Hk is very likely to be irreducible. Higher

weights’ representations are omitted.

Extended basis: We define extended Fibonacci bases for W ≤ 4 as

B2 = A2 ∪ {C, π log(2)}

B3 = A3 ∪{C log(2), πC, π log2(2), π3,=(Li3(1 + i))

}B4 = A4 ∪

{C2, πC log(2), C log2(2), π2C, π log3(2), π3 log(2), log(2)=(Li3(1 + i)),

πζ(3), π=(Li3(1 + i)),=(Li4(1 + i)), ψ(3)

(1

4

)− ψ(3)

(3

4

)}Note that in these 3 cases each BW contains 2W constants.

10

1.3 Main results

In section 3 ∼ 6 the following will be proved:

Theorem 1. All 89 ESs and 263 PLIs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q.

Theorem 2. All 193 QLIs and 172 QPLIs with weight W ≤ 4 are generated by BW over Q.

Theorem 1, a natural consequence of MZV theory (see for instance [18]), will be proved by

a systematic non-MZV approach. Theorem 2, intimately connected with level 4 MZVs, will be

established by generalizing the approach above.

See tables of section 9 for all their closed-forms and 8, 10 for applications.

2 LI

LIs with weight W ≤ 5 are completely and explicitly solved in [1]. We summarize and add some

new results, generating linear relations between LIs.

2.1 Brute force

It is known that∫ log(a+x) log(b+x)

c+x dx,∫ log2(a+x) log(b+x)

a+x dx,∫ log(a+x) log2(b+x)

a+x dx,∫ logn(a+x)

b+x have

polylog primitives. By Mathematica we have:

F1:

∫log3(a+ x)

b+ xdx = 6Li4

(a+ x

a− b

)+ 3 log2(a+ x)Li2

(a+ x

a− b

)−6 log(a+ x)Li3

(a+ x

a− b

)+ log3(a+ x) log

(− b+ x

a− b

)

F2:

∫3 log2(a+ x) log(b+ x)

a+ xdx = −6Li4

(a+ x

a− b

)− 3 log2(a+ x)Li2

(a+ x

a− b

)+6 log(a+ x)Li3

(a+ x

a− b

)− log3(a+ x) log

(− b+ x

a− b

)+ log3(a+ x) log(b+ x)

F3:

∫log(a+ x) log(b+ x)

c+ xdx = Li3

((a− c)(b+ x)

(b− c)(a+ x)

)+

(Li2

(b+ x

a+ x

)− Li2

((a− c)(b+ x)

(b− c)(a+ x)

))log

((a− c)(b+ x)

(a+ x)(b− c)

)

11

+Li2

(a+ x

a− c

)(log(b+ x)− log

((a− c)(b+ x)

(a+ x)(b− c)

))+ Li2

(b+ x

b− c

)(log

((a− c)(b+ x)

(a+ x)(b− c)

)+ log(a+ x)

)

+1

2

(− log

((a− b)(c+ x)

(a+ x)(c− b)

)+ log

(a− ba+ x

)+ log

(c+ x

c− a

))log

2

((a− c)(b+ x)

(a+ x)(b− c)

)− Li3

(b+ x

a+ x

)

−Li3

(a+ x

a− c

)− Li3

(b+ x

b− c

)+ log

(b+ x

b− c

)(log

(−c+ x

b− c

)− log

(c+ x

c− a

))log

((a− c)(b+ x)

(a+ x)(b− c)

)

+1

2log

(b+ x

b− c

)(log

(b+ x

b− c

)− 2 log(a+ x)

)(log

(c+ x

c− a

)− log

(−c+ x

b− c

))+ log(a+ x) log(b+ x) log

(c+ x

c− a

)

F4:

∫ 12 log2(a + x) log(b + x)

b + xdx = −24

(−Li4

(a + x

a − b

)+ Li4

(−b + x

a − b

)+ Li4

(b + x

a + x

))− 12Li2

(b + x

a + x

)log

2(−b + x

a + x

)

+12Li2

(a + x

a − b

)(log

(−b + x

a − b

)− log

(−b + x

a + x

))2

+ 24Li2

(a + x

a − b

)log

(a + x

a − b

)(log(b + x) − log

(−b + x

a − b

))

+12Li2

(−b + x

a − b

)(2 log

(a + x

a − b


(−b + x

a − b

))+ log

(−b + x

a − b

)(log

(−b + x

a − b

)− 2 log

(−b + x

a + x

))− 2 log(a + x) log(b + x)

)

+24Li3

(a + x

a − b

)(log

(−b + x

a + x

)− log(b + x)

)+ 24Li3

(−b + x

a − b

)(log

(−b + x

a + x

)+ log(a + x)

)+ 24Li3

(b + x

a + x

)log

(−b + x

a + x

)

+ log4(−b + x

a − b

)+ log

4(−b + x

a + x

)− 4

(log

(−b + x

a − b

)+ log

(a − b

a + x

))log

3(−b + x

a + x

)+ 6 log

2(−b + x

a + x

)log

2(−b + x

a − b

)

−4

(3 log

(a + x

a − b

)+ log

(−b + x

a − b

))log

(−b + x

a + x

)log

2(−b + x

a − b

)+ 6 log

2(a + x) log

2(b + x)

+6 log2(a + x

a − b


(−b + x

a − b

))(3 log

(−b + x

a − b

)+ log(b + x)

)− 4 log

(a + x

a − b

)(3 log(a + x) log

2(b + x) − 2 log

3(−b + x

a − b

))

Here logs and polylogs are principal, following the convention of Mathematica. Based on this,

for each LI we may check by Mathematica whether its primitive is computable. If it is, we get the

closed-form directly via Newton-Leibniz formula.

2.2 General formulas

Proposition 1. The following formulas hold:∫ 1

0

xm logn(x) dx =(−1)nn!

(m+ 1)n+1(1)

LI(0, 0, n; 2) =logn+1(2)

n+ 1(2)

LI(0, n, 0; 0) = LI(n, 0, 0; 1) = (−1)nn!ζ(n+ 1) (3)

LI(0, n, 0; 2) =(1− 2−n

)(−1)nn!ζ(n+ 1) (4)

12

LI(n, 0, 0; 2) = (−1)nn!Lin+1

(1

2

)(5)

LI(1, n, 0; 1) = LI(n, 1, 0, 0) = (−1)n−1n!ζ(n+ 2) (6)

LI(0, n, 1; 1) =(

1− 2−(n+1))

(−1)nn!ζ(n+ 2) (7)

LI(0, 0, n; 1) = −n!

n−1∑k=0

logk(2)Li−k+n+1

(12

)k!

+ n!ζ(n+ 1)− n logn+1(2)

n+ 1(8)

LI(0, 1, n; 2) = n!

n∑k=0

logk(2)Li−k+n+2

(12

)k!

− n!ζ(n+ 2) +logn+2(2)

n+ 2(9)

LI(1, 0, n; 2) = n!

n+2∑k=2

(−1)k−1ζ(k) log−k+n+2(2)

(−k + n+ 2)!+ (−1)nn!Lin+2

(1

2

)+

logn+2(2)

n+ 1(10)

LI(1, n, 0; 0) = LI(n, 1, 0; 1) =1

2(−1)n−1n!

((n+ 1)ζ(n+ 2)−

n∑k=2

ζ(k)ζ(−k + n+ 2)

)(11)

LI(0, n, 1; 0) =1

2(−1)nn!

n∑k=2

(1− 21−k) (1− 2k−n−1

)ζ(k)ζ(−k + n+ 2)

−(−1)nn!

(1

2(n+ 1)ζ(n+ 2)− 2

(1− 2−(n+1)

)log(2)ζ(n+ 1)

) (12)

LI(0, 2n− 1, 1; 2) = −(2n− 1)!

n−1∑k=1

(1− 21−2k

)ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n+ 1)

−(2n− 1)!(

2−(2n+1)ζ(2n+ 1)− (n− 1)(1− 2−2n

)ζ(2n+ 1)

) (13)

LI(1, 2n− 1, 0; 2) = −(2n− 1)!

n−1∑k=1

(1− 22k−2n

)ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n+ 1)

+(2n− 1)!((

(n+ 1)(1− 2−2n

)+ 2−(2n+1)

)ζ(2n+ 1)− 2

(1− 2−2n

)log(2)ζ(2n)

) (14)

LI(2, n, 0; 1) = (−1)nn!

((n+ 2)ζ(n+ 3)−

n+1∑k=2

ζ(k)ζ(−k + n+ 3)

)(15)

13

LI(0, 2n, 2; 1) = 2(2n)!

n∑k=1

(1− 21−2k

)ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n+ 3)

−2(2n)!((

1− 2−(2n+2))nζ(2n+ 3)− 2−(2n+3)ζ(2n+ 3)

) (16)

LI(1, 2n, 1; 1) = −(2n)!2−(2n+1)n∑k=1

(1− 2−2k+2n+2

)ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n+ 3)

+(2n)!(

(2n+ 3)2−(2n+3) − 1)ζ(2n+ 3)

(17)

Proof. (1): x → e−t,Γ. (2): Trivial. (3)-(5): Series expansion of 11−ax , then use (1). (6)-

(7): Series expansion of log(1 − ax). (8): Nielsen-Ramanujan integral. t → 11+x , then use∫ 1

12xm logn(x) dx = ∂n

∂mn1−2−(m+1)

m+1 . (9)-(10): Use (8), integrate by parts. (11)-(12): Series ex-

pansion of log(1−x)1−x , use (1) then ES results in [11]. (13)-(17) Series expansion and [11]. �

For each LI, check whether they are directly solved using general formulas above.

Clarification: Throughout this paper, legitimacy of all operations of exchanging orders of mul-

tiple summation and integration can be justified by convergence theorems.

2.3 Integration by parts

Take F (x) =∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m) in N-L formula

∫ 1

0F ′(x) dx = F (1)− F (0) to obtain linear a linear

relation between LIs. Now consider all possible F . As one can see, this is essentially the process of

partial integration.

Clarification: Though we don’t carry out partial integration from the view of manipulating

single LIs here, this will be used frequently later. Throughout this paper, by ’integration by parts

lifting (up) u′ in integral∫u′v, we mean transforming it into uv −

∫uv′.

2.4 Fractional transformation

Take F (x) =∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)

f(p;x) (p 6= 1) in the identity∫ 1

0F (x) dx =

∫ 1

0

2F( 1−xx+1 )

(x+1)2 dx. Since

log(x)→ log(1−x)−log(x+1), log(1−x)→ log(x)−log(x+1)+log(2), log(x+1)→ log(2)−log(x+1)

under the substitution x → 1−xx+1 , we may obtain a linear relation after expansion and possible

partial fraction decomposition on 1x(x+1) for p = 0. Now consider all possible F .

14

2.5 Beta derivatives

Proposition 2. The following formulas hold:

LI(n,m, 0; 1) = LI(m,n, 0; 0) = lim{a,b}→{0,1}

∂m+nB(a, b)

∂am ∂bn(1)

n∑k=0

(n

k

)LI(k,m, n− k; 1) = 2−(m+1) lim

{a,b}→{0,1}

∂m+nB(a, b)

∂am ∂bn(2)

n∑k=0

(n

k

)LI(k,m, n− k; 0) = 2−(m+1)

(lim

{a,b}→{1,0}

∂m+nB(a, b)

∂am ∂bn+ lim{a,b}→{ 1

2 ,0}∂m+nB(a, b)

∂am ∂bn

)(3)

n∑k=0

(n

k

)LI(k,m, n− k; 2) = 2−(m+1)

(lim

{a,b}→{ 12 ,0}

∂m+nB(a, b)

∂am ∂bn− lim{a,b}→{1,0}

∂m+nB(a, b)

∂am ∂bn

)(4)

LI(0,m, 1; 0) =(

2−(m+1) − 1)

lim{a,b}→{1,0}

∂m+1B(a, b)

∂am ∂b1+ 2−(m+1) lim

{a,b}→{ 12 ,0}

∂m+1B(a, b)

∂am ∂b1(5)

n∑k=0

(−1)k(n

k

)LI(k, n− k, 0; 2) = lim

s→1

∂n

∂sn

(21−s − 1

)π

sin(πs)(6)

n∑j=0

n+1∑k=0

(nj

)(n+ 1

k

)(− log(2))j+kLI(−k + n+ 1, 0, n− j; 2) =

1

2lim

{x,y}→{0,1}

∂2n+1B(a, b)

∂an ∂bn+1−

log2n+2(2)

2n+ 2(7)

n∑k=0

(−1)k(n

k

)LI(0, n− k, k; 2) = (−1)n

n∑l=0

l!

(n

l

)Lil+1

(1

2

)logn−l(2) (8)

(−1)km∑j=0

(−1)j(m

j

)LI(0, j + k,−j +m+ n; 1) +

n∑j=0

(−1)j(n

j

)LI(0, j + k,−j +m+ n; 1)

= (−1)m+nk∑j=0

(−1)k(k

j

)(lim

{x,y}→{0,1}

∂k+m+nB(a, b)

∂aj+m ∂b−j+k+n+ lim{x,y}→{1,0}

∂k+m+nB(a, b)

∂aj+m ∂b−j+k+n

) (9)

Proof. (1): DifferentiateB(a, b). (2)-(4): consider∫ 1

0

logm(x) logn(1−x2)f(p;x) dx. Using 1

1−x = x+11−x2 ,

1x+1 =

1−x1−x2 and that x2 → t give RHS. Alternatively log(1−x2) = log(1−x)+log(1+x) and binomial the-

orem for expansion give LHS. (5): Multiply both sides of log(x+1)1−x =

x log(1−x2)1−x2 +

log(1−x2)1−x2 − log(1−x)

1−x

15

with logm(x) then integrate, t → x2. (6): Consider F (x) =logn( x

1−x )x+1 , substituting t → x

1−x and

differentiating∫∞

0xs−1

(x+1)(2x+1) dx =π(21−s−1)

sin(πs) yield RHS, and binomial theorem yields LHS. (7):∫ 12

0logn(1−x) logn+1(x)

1−x dx is evaluated in [15]. Let x → 1−u2 , use binomial theorem twice. (8): Sim-

ilar to (6), subsitute t → xx+1 in integral of F1(x) =

logn( xx+1 )

x+1 , series expansion. (9): Consider∫∞0

logk(x) logm(x+1) logn( 1x+1)

x dx,m, n > 0. Substitution x → 1t for (1,∞) part and binomial theo-

rem yields LHS, while x→ 1−tt for the whole integral and partial fractions give RHS. �

Partial derivatives in above expressions can be evaluated by Mathematica (or manually by com-

puting Laurent series of polygamma and plugging in their special values). Now consider all possible

relations generated from these formulas.

2.6 Contour integration

Integrate

F (z) =logk(1− z) logm(z) logn(z + 1)

z(1− z)(with all logs principal) along the large upper semicircular contour, by Cauchy theorem we have∫∞+0i

−∞+0iF (z)dz = 0. Split the integral into 4 parts by branch points 0,±1, use x → ±t, x → ± 1

t

to map them to (0, 1), after expansion we obtain a linear relation (see [1] and sections below for

details and examples). Now consider all possible F .

Clarification: Here and below, by ’principal’ we follow the convention of Mathematica, that is,

the argument of log/polylogs vary in (−π, π).

2.7 Double integration

In [1] a symmetric double log integral is investigated, which essentially yields:

LI(2n, 0, 1; 1) = (2n)!

(n−1∑k=0

(−1)kLik+1

(1

2

)Li−k+2n+1

(1

2

)+

1

2(−1)nLin+1

(1

2

)2

+ Li2n+2

(1

2

))

2.8 Hypergeometric identities

Differentiating hypergeometric identities can be used to generate the most nontrivial high weight

relations, see [1].

16

2.9 Solution

All linear relations involving LIs with W ≤ 5 generated by subsection 2-1∼2-6 already yields:

Lemma 1. All LIs with weight W ≤ 5 can be generated by AW over Q.

In fact W = 6 case is also solvable using 2-1∼2-6 only, but we won’t record their closed-forms

below due to great complexity (for their values we refer readers to [1]). W = 6 results will be

frequently used later so it’s better to be aware of the general structure.

Clarification: In section N , all subjects computed in section 1, · · · , N − 1 are supposed to be

known. As an example, LI values are frequently used below with the statement ’· · · modulo LIs’.

3 ES

Since the theory of Euler sums is well developed already, this section won’t be a thorough summary,

but a simple review of ES evaluation and solution of several ESs.

Excluding the trivial∑∞n=1

(±1)n−1

np , there lefts 89 ESs with weight W ≤ 5 (2, 9, 24, 54 for

weight 2, 3, 4, 5 respectively) .


According to [11], we have

Lemma 2. ES(±1; p), ES(±1;−p) (p even), ES(p; p), ES(p; q) (p + q odd or smaller than 7),

ES(1, 1; p) (p odd or smaller than 5) are reducible to Zeta values.

See [2, 7] for alternative proofs.

17

3.2 Symmetric relations

By inclusion-exclusion (abbr. I-E) principle we have:

∑0<j,k,l

=∑

0<j,k≤l

+∑

0<j,l≤k

+∑

0<k,l≤j

−∑

0<j≤k=l

−∑

0<k≤j=l

−∑

0<l≤j=k

+∑

0<j=k=l

Apply this identity as an operator on all triple summands (±1)j−1(±1)k−1(±1)l−1

jakblcto obtain linear

relations. For instance, if we choose 3 ’±’s to be ’+’ and assuming convergence one obtain

ζ(a)ζ(b)ζ(c) = ES(a, b; c)+ES(a, c; b)+ES(b, c; a)−ES(a; b+c)−ES(b; a+c)−ES(c; a+b)+ES(a+b+c)

Consider all other choices and n-ple generalizations to obtain relations, see for instance [21, 22].

See also [9] for similar contents on MZVs.

3.3 Partial fractions

Consider Cauchy product of the double sum∑∞j=1

∑∞k=1

1jakb

. By partial fraction decomposition

we know that all sums of the form∑n−1k=1

1ka(n−k)b

are expressible in a combination of homogeneous

H(k)n

na+b−k, k = 1, · · · , a+ b− 1, we found that ζ(a)ζ(b) is expressed in a corresponding combination of

ESs, which is a linear relation. We may also consider (±1)j−1(±1)k−1

jakband generalizations to triple

sums. See [9] for more.


See [11] again for generating ES relations using contour integration and polygamma kernels.

3.5 Solution

3.5.1 Preparation

In [11, 19, 21, 22] all but 1 weight 3 ES, 2 weight 4 ESs and 7 weight 5 ESs are solved. 3 weight

< 5 ESs are evaluated trivially. Now we will sketch a proof for the remaining 7, that is

ES(−1,−1,−1;−2), ES(−1,−1,−1,−1;−1), ES(1, 1,−2;−1), ES(1, 1,−1,−1;−1)

ES(1,−1,−1;−2), ES(1,−1,−2;−1), ES(1,−1,−1,−1;−1)

18

All LIs, low weight ESs and other 47 weight 5 ESs are supposed to be known. Also, several GES

(Geometric Euler Sums, i.e. sums involving 12n like

∑∞n=1

Hnn32n ) computed in [19] will be applied too.

Proposition 3. (1)-(15) hold where |x| < 1 and naturally extends to |z| ≤ 1 assuming convergence:

1

1∓ x=

∞∑n=0

(±x)n,− log(1∓ x) =

∞∑n=1

(±x)n

n(1)

− log(1∓ x)

1∓ x=

∞∑n=1

Hn (±x)n,

log(1± x)

1∓ x=

∞∑n=1

H̃n (±x)n

(2)

log2(1± x) =

∞∑n=1

2(−1)n−1

(1

n2− Hn

n

)(±x)

n(3)

log(1− x) log(x+ 1) = −∞∑n=1

(H̃2n

n+

1

2n2

)x2n (4)

∞∑n=1

(±x)n

nk= Lik(±x),

∞∑n=1

H(k)n (±x)

n=

Lik(±x)

1∓ x,

∞∑n=1

H̃(k)n (±x)

n= −Lik(∓x)

1∓ x (5)

∞∑n=1

Hnxn

n= Li2(x) +

1

2log2(1− x) (6)

∞∑n=1

H̃nxn

n= Li2

(1− x

2

)− Li2(−x)− Li2

(1

2

)− log(2) log(1− x) (7)

∞∑n=1

(Hn) 2xn =Li2(x)

1− x+

log2(1− x)

1− x (8)

∞∑n=1

(H̃n

)2

xn =2(Li2(

1−x2

)− Li2

(12

)+ log

(x+1

2

)log(1− x)

)+ Li2(x)

1− x (9)

∞∑n=1

HnH̃nxn =

Li2(

1−x2

)− Li2(−x)− Li2

(12

)− 1

2 log2(x+ 1)− log(2) log(1− x)

1− x (10)

∞∑n=1

HnH(2)n xn =

Li3(1− x) + Li3(x) + 12 log(x) log2(1− x)− 1

6π2 log(1− x)− ζ(3)

1− x (11)

∞∑n=1

(Hn) 3xn =3Li3(1− x) + Li3(x)− log3(1− x) + 3

2log(x) log2(1− x)− 1

2π2 log(1− x)− 3ζ(3)

1− x (12)

19

∞∑n=1

(Hn) 2xn

n= Li3(x)− Li2(x) log(1− x)− 1

3log3(1− x) (13)

∞∑n=1

H(2)n xn

n= 2Li3(1− x) + Li3(x)− 2Li2(1− x) log(1− x)− Li2(x) log(1− x)− log(x) log2(1− x)− 2ζ(3) (14)

∞∑n=1

Hnxn

n2= −Li3(1− x) + Li3(x) + Li2(1− x) log(1− x) +

1

2log(x) log2(1− x) + ζ(3) (15)

Proof. (1): Trivial. (2)-(5): Cauchy product, use (1). (6)-(7): Applying L(f) =∫ x

0f(t)t dt on

certain f in (5). (8): Denote LHS as F (x), suppose it is of form F (x) = G(x)1−x , then by Cauchy we

have G(x) =∑∞n=1

((Hn) 2 − (Hn−1) 2

)xn. Using Hn−1 = Hn − 1

n and (5), (6) to arrive at RHS.

(9)-(12): Calculating differences like (8). (13)-(15): Make use of L(f) on (5), (6), (8). Mathematica

is used to calculate primitives. �

Proposition 4. (1)-(10) hold where |x| < 1 and naturally extends to |z| ≤ 1 assuming convergence:

(1)

∞∑n=1

(Hn) 2xn

n2=

Li2(x)2

2− 2Li4(1− x) + Li4(x)

−Li2(1− x) log2(1− x) + 2Li3(1− x) log(1− x)− 1

3log(x) log3(1− x) +

π4

45

(2)

∞∑n=1

H(2)n xn

n2= −

1

6log

4

(1

x− 1

)+

2

3log(1− x) log

3

(1

x− 1

)+

2

3log

(1

x

)log

3

(1

x− 1

)

− log2(1− x) log

2

(1

x− 1

)+ 2Li2

(x− 1

x

)log

2

(1

x− 1

)− 2Li2(x) log

2

(1

x− 1

)+

2

3log

3(1− x) log

(1

x− 1

)

+2 log2(1− x) log(x) log

(1

x− 1

)+ 4 log(1− x)Li2(1− x) log

(1

x− 1

)+ 4 log(1− x)Li2(x) log

(1

x− 1

)

−4Li3(1− x) log

(1

x− 1

)− 4Li3

(x− 1

x

)log

(1

x− 1

)− 4Li3(x) log

(1

x− 1

)+π4

18−

1

12log

4

(x

1− x

)

−1

6log

4(1− x) +

1

3log

(1

1− x

)log

3

(x

1− x

)+

1

3log

(x

1− x

)log

3(x)−

2

3log(1− x) log

3(x)−

1

2log

2(x) log

2

(x

1− x

)

+3

2log

2(1− x) log

2(x) + log

(x

1− x

)log(1− x) log

2(x) +

Li2(x)2

2+

1

3log

3

(x

1− x

)log(x)−

4

3log

3(1− x) log(x)

+ log2

(x

1− x

)Li2

(−

x

1− x

)− log

2

(x

1− x

)Li2(1− x)− 2 log

2(1− x)Li2(1− x)− log

2(x)Li2(1− x)

+2 log

(x

1− x

)log(x)Li2(1− x) + 2 log(1− x) log(x)Li2(1− x)− 2 log

2(1− x)Li2(x)− log

2(x)Li2(x)

20

+2 log

(x

1− x

)log(x)Li2(x) + 2 log(1− x) log(x)Li2(x)− 2 log

(x

1− x

)Li3

(−

x

1− x

)− 2 log

(x

1− x

)Li3(1− x)

−2 log

(x

1− x

)Li3(x)+2 log(1−x)Li3(x)+2Li4

(−

x

1− x

)+2Li4(1−x)+4Li4

(x− 1

x

)−Li4(x)−2 log(x)ζ(3)−

log4(x)

12

(3)∞∑n=1

Hnxn

n3=

1

12log

4

(1

x− 1

)−

1

3log(1− x) log

3

(1

x− 1

)−

1

3log

(1

x

)log

3

(1

x− 1

)

+1

2log

2(1− x) log

2

(1

x− 1

)− Li2

(x− 1

x

)log

2

(1

x− 1

)+ Li2(x) log

2

(1

x− 1

)−

1

3log

3(1− x) log

(1

x− 1

)

− log2(1− x) log(x) log

(1

x− 1

)− 2 log(1− x)Li2(1− x) log

(1

x− 1

)− 2 log(1− x)Li2(x) log

(1

x− 1

)

+2Li3(1− x) log

(1

x− 1

)+ 2Li3

(x− 1

x

)log

(1

x− 1

)+ 2Li3(x) log

(1

x− 1

)+

1

24log

4

(x

1− x

)+

1

12log

4(1− x)

+log4(x)

24−

1

6log

(1

1− x

)log

3

(x

1− x

)−

1

6log(x) log

3

(x

1− x

)+

1

3log(1− x) log

3(x) +

1

4log

2

(x

1− x

)log

2(x)

−3

4log

2(1− x) log

2(x)−

1

6log

3(x) log

(x

1− x

)−

1

2log(1− x) log

2(x) log

(x

1− x

)+

2

3log

3(1− x) log(x)

+1

2log

2

(x

1− x

)Li2(1− x) + log

2(1− x)Li2(1− x) +

1

2log

2(x)Li2(1− x)− log(x) log

(x

1− x

)Li2(1− x)

− log(1− x) log(x)Li2(1− x)−1

2log

2

(x

1− x

)Li2

(x

x− 1

)+ log

2(1− x)Li2(x) +

1

2log

2(x)Li2(x)

− log(x) log

(x

1− x

)Li2(x)− log(1− x) log(x)Li2(x) + log

(x

1− x

)Li3(1− x) + log

(x

1− x

)Li3

(x

x− 1

)

+ log

(x

1− x

)Li3(x)− log(1− x)Li3(x)− Li4(1− x)− Li4

(x

x− 1

)− 2Li4

(x− 1

x

)+ 2Li4(x) + log(x)ζ(3)−

π4

36

(4)

∞∑n=1

HnH(2)n xn

n=

Li2(1− x)2

2−

Li2(x)2

2+π2Li2(x)

6+ Li4(1− x)− Li4

(x

x− 1

)

+1

2Li2(1− x) log

2

(x

1− x

)−

1

2Li2

(x

x− 1

)log

2

(x

1− x

)+

1

2Li2(1− x) log

2(1− x) +

1

2Li2(1− x) log

2(x)

+1

2Li2(x) log

2(x)− Li2(1− x) log(x) log

(x

1− x

)− Li2(x) log(x) log

(x

1− x

)+ Li3(1− x) log

(x

1− x

)

+Li3

(x

x− 1

)log

(x

1− x

)+ Li3(x) log

(x

1− x

)− Li2(x) log(1− x) log(x)− Li3(1− x) log(1− x) + ζ(3) log(1− x)

−ζ(3) log(x)+1

24log

4

(x

1− x

)+

log4(x)

24−

1

6log

(1

1− x

)log

3

(x

1− x

)−

1

6log(x) log

3

(x

1− x

)−

1

6log

3(x) log

(x

1− x

)

+1

3log(1−x) log

3(x)+

1

4log

2(x) log

2

(x

1− x

)−

1

2log(1−x) log

2(x) log

(x

1− x

)+

1

12π2

log2(1−x)−

1

4log

2(1−x) log

2(x)−

π4

40

(5)

∞∑n=1

H(3)n xn

n= −Li2(x)2

2+ Li4(x)− Li3(x) log(1− x)

21

(6)∞∑n=1

(Hn) 3xn

n=

3Li2(1 − x)2

2−

Li2(x)2

2+π2Li2(x)

2− 3Li4(1 − x) − 3Li4

(x

x − 1

)− 2Li4(x) +

3

2Li2(1 − x) log

2(

x

1 − x

)

−3

2Li2

(x

x − 1

)log

2(

x

1 − x

)−

3

2Li2(1 − x) log

2(1 − x) +

3

2Li2(1 − x) log

2(x) +

3

2Li2(x) log

2(x) − 3Li2(1 − x) log(x) log

(x

1 − x

)

−3Li2(x) log(x) log

(x

1 − x

)+ 3Li3(1 − x) log

(x

1 − x

)+ 3Li3

(x

x − 1

)log

(x

1 − x

)+ 3Li3(x) log

(x

1 − x

)− 3Li2(x) log(1 − x) log(x)

+3Li3(1 − x) log(1 − x) + 2Li3(x) log(1 − x) + 3ζ(3) log(1 − x) − 3ζ(3) log(x) +1

8log

4(

x

1 − x

)+

1

4log

4(1 − x) +

log4(x)

8

−1

2log

(1

1 − x

)log

3(

x

1 − x

)−

1

2log(x) log

3(

x

1 − x

)−

1

2log

3(x) log

(x

1 − x

)+ log(1 − x) log

3(x) − log

3(1 − x) log(x)

+3

4log

2(x) log

2(

x

1 − x

)−

3

2log(1 − x) log

2(x) log

(x

1 − x

)+

1

4π2

log2(1 − x) −

3

4log

2(1 − x) log

2(x) −

π4

120

(7)∞∑n=1

H̃nxn

n2= −Li3

(x + 1

2

)− Li3(−x) − Li3(x) − Li3

(x

x + 1

)+ Li3

(2x

x + 1

)+ log(2)Li2(x) + Li2

(x + 1

2

)(log(x) − log

(2x

x + 1

))

+Li2

( 1

2−x

2

)log(x) + Li2(x)

(log

(x

x + 1

)+ log(x + 1)

)+

(Li2

(x

x + 1

)− Li2

(2x

x + 1

))log

(2x

x + 1

)

+1

2log

2(2) log(x) +

1

2log

2(

2x

x + 1

)(log

(1 − x

2

)+ log

(1

x + 1

)− log

(−x − 1

x + 1

))+ log(2) log(x) log

(2x

x + 1

)

−1

2log(2) log(x)(log(x) − 2 log(x + 1) + log(4)) −

1

12π2

log(x) + log

(1 − x

2

)log

(x + 1

2

)log(x) +

7ζ(3)

8+

log3(2)

6

(8)∞∑n=1

HnH̃nxn

n= −Li3

(1 − x

2

)− 2Li3

(x + 1

2

)+ Li3

(x + 1

1 − x

)− Li3(1 − x) − Li3

(x + 1

x − 1

)− Li3(−x) − Li3(x) − Li3

(x

x + 1

)

+Li3

(2x

x + 1

)+

1

2log(2)

(2Li2(x) + log

2(1 − x)

)+ Li2

(1 − x

2

)log(1 − x) − Li2

(1 − x

2

)(log(1 − x) − log(x))

+Li2

(x + 1

2

)(log(x) − log

(2x

x + 1

))+ Li2

(x + 1

2

)log(x + 1) + Li2(1 − x)

(log(x + 1) − log

(x + 1

1 − x

))

+

(Li2

(x + 1

x − 1

)− Li2

(x + 1

1 − x

))log

(x + 1

1 − x

)+ Li2(−x)(log(1 − x) − log(x)) + Li2(−x) log(x) + Li2(x)

(log

(x

x + 1

)+ log(x + 1)

)

+

(Li2

(x

x + 1

)− Li2

(2x

x + 1

))log

(2x

x + 1

)+ Li2(x + 1)

(log

(x + 1

1 − x

)+ log(1 − x)

)− Li2(x + 1) log(x + 1)

+1

2log

(1 − x

2

)log

2(x+1)−

1

2log(−x) log

2(x+1)+

1

12

(π2 − 6 log

2(2))log(1−x)+

1

2log

2(x + 1

1 − x

)(− log

(2x

x − 1

)+ log

(−

2

x − 1

)+ log(x)

)

−1

12

(π2 − 6 log

2(2))log(x) +

1

2log

2(

2x

x + 1

)(log

(1 − x

2

)+ log

(1

x + 1

)− log

(−x − 1

x + 1

))+ log(2) log(x) log

(2x

x + 1

)

−1

2log(2) log(x)(log(x) − 2 log(x + 1) + log(4)) + log

(1 − x

2

)log

(x + 1

2

)log(x) + log

(x + 1

1 − x

)(log(−x) − log(x)) log(x + 1)

+ log(1 − x) log(x) log(x + 1) +1

2(log(x) − log(−x)) log(x + 1)(log(x + 1) − 2 log(1 − x)) +

15ζ(3)

8+

log3(2)

2−

1

6π2

log(2)

(9)∞∑n=1

(H̃n

)2xn

n= −4Li3

(1 − x

2

)− 2Li3

(x + 1

2

)+ 2Li3

(x + 1

1 − x

)− 2Li3

(x + 1

x − 1

)− Li3(x) − 2Li3

(x

x + 1

)+ 2Li3

(2x

x + 1

)

−2Li3(x+1)+log(2)(2Li2(x) + log

2(1 − x)

)+4Li2

(1 − x

2

)log(1−x)−2Li2

(1 − x

2

)(log(1−x)−log(x))+2Li2

(x + 1

2

)(log(x) − log

(2x

x + 1

))

+2Li2(1−x)(log(x + 1) − log

(x + 1

1 − x

))−2Li2(1−x) log(1−x)+2

(Li2

(x + 1

x − 1

)− Li2

(x + 1

1 − x

))log

(x + 1

1 − x

)−Li2(x)(log(1−x)− log(x))

22

−Li2(x) log(x)+2Li2(x)

(log

(x

x + 1

)+ log(x + 1)

)+2

(Li2

(x

x + 1

)− Li2

(2x

x + 1

))log

(2x

x + 1

)+2Li2(x+1)

(log

(x + 1

1 − x

)+ log(1 − x)

)

− log(2) log2(1 − x) +

1

6

(π2 − 6 log

2(2))log(1 − x) + log

2(x + 1

1 − x

)(− log

(2x

x − 1

)+ log

(−

2

x − 1

)+ log(x)

)− log

2(1 − x) log(x)

−1

6

(π2 − 6 log

2(2))log(x) + log

2(

2x

x + 1

)(log

(1 − x

2

)+ log

(1

x + 1

)− log

(−x − 1

x + 1

))+ 2 log(2) log(x) log

(2x

x + 1

)

− log(2) log(x)(log(x) − 2 log(x + 1) + log(4)) + 2 log

(1 − x

2

)log

(x + 1

2

)log(x) + 2 log

(x + 1

1 − x

)(log(−x) − log(x)) log(x + 1)

+2 log(1 − x) log(x) log(x + 1) + (log(x) − log(−x)) log(x + 1)(log(x + 1) − 2 log(1 − x)) +15ζ(3)

4+ log

3(2) −

1

3π2

log(2)

(10) The following four generating functions are polylog expressible, using formula (1)-(6):

∞∑n=1

(Hn) 4xn,

∞∑n=1

(Hn) 2H(2)n xn,

∞∑n=1

(H(2)n

)2xn,

∞∑n=1

HnH(3)n xn

Proof. (1)-(9): Again, make use of L(f) in appropriate functions in Proposition 3, then Math-

ematica. They are verified via differentiation. (10): Calculate differences. The results will be

combinations of (1)-(6) thus extremely lengthy, so we omit them. �

Proposition 5. The following formulas hold:∫ 1

0

xn−1 logk(x) dx =(−1)kk!

nk+1(1)

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log(1− x) dx = −∞∑j=1

1

j(j + n)= −Hn

n(2)

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log2(1− x) dx =

∞∑j=1

1

j(j + n)2=

(Hn) 2 +H(2)n

n(3)

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log(x) log(1− x) dx =Hn

n2+H

(2)n

n− π2

6n(4)

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log3(1− x) dx = −3HnH(2)n + (Hn) 3 + 2H

(3)n

n(5)

−∫ 1

0

xn−1 log(x+ 1) dx =

∞∑j=1

(−1)j

j(j + n)=

(−1)n−1H̃n − (−1)n−1 log(2)− log(2)

n(6)

∞∑j=1

(−1)j

j(j + n)2=

(−1)n−1H̃(2)n

n+

(−1)n−1H̃n

n2− (−1)n−1 log(2)

n2− log(2)

n2− π2(−1)n−1

12n(7)

23

Proof. (1): Trivial. (2)-(5): Differentiate Beta functions, then transform polygamma constants into

harmonic ones (for instance ψ(2)(n + 1) = 2H(3)n − 2ζ(3), ψ(3)(n + 1) = π4

15 − 6H(4)n , etc). (6)-(7):

Invoke partial fractions and that η(1) = log(2), η(2) = π2

12 . �

3.5.2 Confrontation

Now we compute 7 remaining weight 5 Euler sums:


(1) ES(−1,−1,−1;−2)

= −18Li5

(1

2

)− π2ζ(3)

8+

1229ζ(5)

64+

21

8ζ(3) log2(2) +

3 log5(2)

20+

3

4π2 log3(2)− 29

160π4 log(2)

(2) ES(−1,−1,−1,−1;−1)

= −48Li5

(1

2

)− 4Li4

(1

2

)log(2) +

5π2ζ(3)

48+

733ζ(5)

16+

13 log5(2)

30+

3

2π2 log3(2)− 71

180π4 log(2)

(3) ES(1, 1,−2;−1)

= 6Li5

(1

2

)− π2ζ(3)

48− 93ζ(5)

64− 1

20log5(2) +

1

36π2 log3(2)− 13π4 log(2)

1440

(4) ES(1, 1,−1,−1;−1)

= 12Li5

(1

2

)+π2ζ(3)

16− 201ζ(5)

16− 3

8ζ(3) log2(2) +

log5(2)

10+

1

12π2 log3(2) +

97

720π4 log(2)

(5) ES(1,−1,−1;−2)

= 10Li5

(1

2

)−2Li4

(1

2

)log(2)+

π2ζ(3)

96−10ζ(5)−7

8ζ(3) log2(2)−1

6log5(2)+

2

9π2 log3(2)+

1

10π4 log(2)

(6) ES(1,−1,−2;−1)

= 4Li4

(1

2

)log(2) +

7

16ζ(3) log2(2) +

log5(2)

6− 5

72π2 log3(2)− 1

480π4 log(2

(7) ES(1,−1,−1,−1;−1)

24

= 2Li5

(1

2

)+

13π2ζ(3)

96− 83ζ(5)

32+

9

16ζ(3) log2(2)− 13

60log5(2) +

41

72π2 log3(2)− 1

180π4 log(2)

Proof. (1)-(2): Exploit symmetry. Take (2) as an example, we have

ES(−1,−1,−1,−1;−1) =∑

0<j,k,l,m≤n

(−1)j−1(−1)k−1(−1)l−1(−1)m−1(−1)n−1

jklmn

Consider the analogous sum without restrictions, by I-E principle

log5(2) = 5ES(−1,−1,−1,−1;−1)−10ES(−1,−1,−1; 2)+10ES(−1,−1;−3)−5ES(−1; 4)+η(5)

Since all ESs but the desired one are known, (2) is established. (1) is similar.

(3): Multiply both sides of Prop. 5(7) with (Hn) 2 then sum w.r.t n, we have:

−π2

12ES(1, 1;−1)− log(2)ES(1, 1; 2)− log(2)ES(1, 1;−2)

+ES(1, 1,−1;−2) + ES(1, 1,−2;−1) =

∞∑n=1

∞∑j=1

(−1)j (Hn) 2

j(j + n)2

Using formulas above we have:

∞∑n=1

∞∑j=1

(−1)j (Hn) 2

j(j + n)2=

∫ 1

0

log(x)

x

∞∑j=1

(−1)j−1xj

j

( ∞∑n=1

(Hn) 2xn

)dx

=

∫ 1

0

(1

x+

1

1− x

)log(x) log(x+ 1)

(Li2(x) + log2(1− x)

)dx

Therefore we only need to evaluate PLI(0, 1, 1; 21; 0), PLI(0, 1, 1; 21; 1). Indeed:

PLI(0, 1, 1; 21; 1) =

∞∑n=1

∞∑j=1

(−1)j−1∫ 1

0log(x)xj+n−1 dx

jn2=

∞∑n=1

∞∑j=1

(−1)j

jn2(j + n)2

PLI(0, 1, 1; 21; 0) = · · · = −∞∑n=1

∞∑j=1

H̃j

n2(j + n+ 1)2

For the first one, sum w.r.t either n or j first and the PLI reduces to known ESs. For the second,

sum w.r.t n yields

−∞∑n=1

∞∑j=1

H̃j

n2(j + n+ 1)2= −

∞∑j=1

(H̃j −

(−1)j−1

j

)(−2Hj

j3−H

(2)j

j2+π2

3j2

)

25

All ES components on RHS are also known so (3) is proved.

(4): Multiply both sides of Prop. 5(3) with (−1)n−1

H̃n

2and sum n, the ES boils down to

PLI(2, 0, 0; 22; 1/2), PLI(2, 0, 0; 24; 1/2) via Prop. 3(9). For PLI(2, 0, 0; 22; 1/2), use Prop. 3(5)

for expansion to reduce them to known ESs. For PLI(2, 0, 0; 24; 1/2), use that:

Li2

(1− x

2

)+Li2

(x+ 1

2

)= log(2) log(1−x)+log(2) log(x+1)−log(1−x) log(x+1)+

π2

6−log2(2)

to reduce them to PLI(2, 0, 0; 23; 1/2) modulo LIs. For the final 2 PLIs, by substitution t→ 1− x,

single/double expansion forLi2( x2 )1− x2

/Li2( x2 )

1−x respectively and ES/GES results [19] they are solved

either so (4) is proved.

(5): Same as (4), except that we start from Prop. 5(4). One may verify that all ESs appeared

during reduction are known and all PLIs can be reduced to known ESs.

(6): Multiply both sides of Prop. 5(7) with HnH̃n, remaining steps are alike to (3)-(5), in which

the value of (5) is used.

(7): Denote f(x) =∑∞n=1

(H̃n

)3xn, by calculating differences of the generating function we

have f(−x) = −3P (x)−3Q(x)−Li3(x)x+1 , where P (x) =

∑∞n=1

(H̃n)2xn

n , Q(x) =∑∞n=1

(−1)nH̃nxn

n2 . Thus

ES(1,−1,−1,−1;−1) =

∫ 1

0

f(−x) log(1− x)

xdx =

∫ 1

0

log(1− x)(−3P (x)− Li3(x)− 3Q(x))

x(x+ 1)dx

Integrate by parts using∫log(1− x)

x(x+ 1)dx = u(x) =

π2

6− Li2

(1− x

2

)− Li2(x)− log(1− x) log

(x+ 1

2

)

We only have to compute

∫ 1

0

u(x)

x

(3

∞∑n=1

(−1)n

nH̃nx

n + 3

∞∑n=1

(H̃n

)2xn + Li2(x)

)dx

Which, by Proposition 3, equals to

3

∫ 1

0

u(x)

x(1− x)

(2Li2

(1− x

2

)+ Li2(x)− 2Li2

(1

2

)+ 2 log

(x+ 1

2

)log(1− x)

)dx

26

+3

∫ 1

0

u(x)

x

(Li2

(x+ 1

2

)− Li2(x)− Li2

(1

2

)− log(2) log(x+ 1)

)dx+

∫ 1

0

Li2(x)u(x)

xdx

Expand all these expressions. Some parts of the integrand are divergent so we put them together

again, for instance∫ 1

0

Li2(x)(Li2( x+12 )−Li2( 1

2 ))x dx. Apply integration by parts on all these composite

integrals (in the example lift up a Li3(x)) to convert them into convergent PLIs. After this we

reduce it to plenty of LIs and PLIs. For each of them, integrate by parts and use techniques in

(3)-(6) over and over again (or more generally, use the expansion algorithm in section 4), all PLIs

can be reduced to lower weight ESs and 53 weight 5 ESs already known, hence (7) is proved. �

Thus all 89 ESs with W ≤ 5 are evaluated.

4 PLI

Due to existence of a polylog term, a PLI’s weight W ≥ 3. There are 11, 55, 197 PLIs for weight

3, 4, 5 respectively.

4.1 Brute force

Some of the PLIs can be calculated by brute force, for instanceLi2( x+1

2 ) log(1−x)

x+1 has primitive

log(2)Li3(x+1

2

)− 1

2Li2(x+1

2

)2. For each PLI, check by Mathematica whether the primitive is solv-

able and evaluate it if so.


See [12, 15] for proofs of the following:

Lemma 3.∫ 1

0Lim(x)Lin(x)

x dx,∫ 1

0logm(x)Lin(x)

1−x dx (m + n even) and∫ 1

0Lin+1(x) logn(x)

x+1 dx are re-

ducible to Zeta values.

Thus PLIs of these types are solved directly.

27


In spirit of subsection 2-3, generalize F to∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)

∏6k=1

∏Nn=2 L(n, k;x)b(n,k). For those

involving L(n, k;x), k ∈ {3, 5, 6}, after partial fractions another integration by parts lifting log(1−x)

is needed to obtain a regular relation modulo LIs. Now consider all possible F .


Similar to subsection 2-4, apply x → 1−xx+1 in integral of F =

∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)∏6

k=1

∏Nn=2 L(n,k;x)b(n,k)

f(p;x) ,

where b(n, 3) = b(n, 4) = 0. For p = 1, after partial fractions another integration by parts lifting

log(1− x) is needed to obtain a regular relation modulo LIs. Now consider all possible F .

4.5 Complementary integrals

Denote P (x) =∏Nn=2 Lin(x)a(n), by equally splitting (0, 1) and substituting t = 1±x

2 we have:

∫ 1

0

P(

1−x2

)logm

(1−x2

)logn

(x+12

)1∓ x

+P(x+12

)logm

(x+12

)logn

(1−x2

)1± x

dx =

∫ 1

0

P (x) logm(x) logn(1− x)

f±(x)dx

Here f+(x) = x, f−(x) = 1− x. Expand LHS to get a linear relation. Now consider all possible P .

4.6 Polylog identities

Proposition 7. The following formulas hold on (0, 1) and naturally extend to the plane, where all

logs/polylogs are principal:

Lin(−x) + Lin(x) =Lin

(x2)

2n−1(1)

Li2(1− x) + Li2(x) =π2

6− log(x) log(1− x) (2)

Li2

(x

x− 1

)+ Li2(x) = −1

2log2(1− x) (3)

Li2

(− 1

x

)+ Li2(−x) = −π

2

6− 1

2log2(x) (4)

Li2

(1− x

2

)+ Li2

(x+ 1

2

)= log(2) log(x+ 1) + log(2) log(1− x)− log(1− x) log(x+ 1) +

π2

6− log2(2) (5)

28

Li2

(1− x

2

)+ Li2

(x− 1

x+ 1

)= −1

2log2(x+ 1) + log(2) log(x+ 1)− 1

2log2(2) (6)

Li3(−x)− Li3

(− 1

x

)= −1

6log3(x)− 1

6π2 log(x) (7)

Li3

(x

x− 1

)+ Li3(1− x) + Li3(x) =

1

6log3(1− x)− 1

2log(x) log2(1− x) +

1

6π2 log(1− x) + ζ(3) (8)

Li3

(1− x

2

)+ Li3

(x+ 1

2

)+ Li3

(x− 1

x+ 1

)=

1

6log3(x+ 1)− 1

2log2(2) log(1− x)

−1

2log2(x+ 1) log(1− x) +

(π2

6− log2(2)

2

)log(x+ 1)

+ log(2) log(1− x) log(x+ 1) + ζ(3) +log3(2)

3− 1

6π2 log(2)

(9)

Proof. (1)-(4), (7)-(8): Classical formulas, see [14]. (5), (6), (9): Substitute t→ 1−x2 in (2), (3), (8)

respectively. �

Now, multiply both sides of (1) with F (x) =logm(1−x2) logk(x)

x , integrate on (0, 1). Substitute

t → x2 on RHS, expand (log(1 − x) + log(x + 1))m on LHS, we obtain a relation. Another choice

is F (x) =x logm(1−x2) logk(x)

1−x2 , where we also use partial fractions to decompose LHS. Now consider

all possible F .

Moreover, multiply both sides of (9) with F (x) =∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)

f(p;x) , it generates a relation between

3 PLIs since all LIs on RHS are known. For (5), (6) the process is similar, except that we may

broaden the range of F to∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)

f(p;x) and L(2,k;x)f(p;x) . Now consider all possible F for 3 formulas

to engender linear relations.

Clarification: If we derive all closed-forms of PLIs involving L(2, 2;x) hence L(2, 6;x) (via frac-

tional transformation), those involving L(2, 3/4;x) will be natural corollaries thus redundant in the

systematic solution. However, as we will see in the next subsection, solving all L(2, 2;x) type PLIs

directly is unachievable. As a matter of fact, some of the independent relations only generate from

manipulating L(2, 3/4;x) type, say subsection 4-7 (reflection of Lin(

1−x2

)), 6-10-4, hence this part

is necessary.

29

4.7 Series expansion

Weight 5 PLIs are sorted into 4 classes, that is, (2,1,1), (3,1), (4), (2,2). The index indicates the

quantity as well as order of polylog terms, for instance, PLI(1, 1, 0; 22; 2) belongs to (2,1,1) class

for it contains one Li2 term and two log terms in numerator. Note that class (1,1,1,1,1) is excluded

for they are simply LIs.

From now on we only discuss about weight 5 PLIs for lower weights are relevantly trivial. More-

over, we restrict the use of this method to (2,1,1), (3,1) and (4) class PLIs. Furthermore, we require

the only polylog term L(n, k;x) (n = 2, 3, 4) contained in the PLI to satisfy 1 ≤ k ≤ 3. Denote the

set of these PLIs as Q.

We only present the general procedure of converting the PLI into combination of ESs. In this

subsection ’ES’ represents all ordinary ESs and all GESs.

Step 1. Reflection. If the only polylog term involved is Lin(

1−x2

), substitute t = 1 − x in the

integral. If the only polylog term involved is Lin(−x), keep it unchanged. If the only polylog term

involved is Lin(x), keep it unchanged, or reduce the integral to the corresponding one involving

Lin(1 − x) via (3.4.2) modulo known LIs, then substitute t = 1 − x. After this operation, the

argument in polylog term is either x or x2 . In this step we have 2 choices for case Lin(x) and 1

choice for other 2 cases.

Step 2. Determine the invariant part of integrand. Since we will use (2.5.16)-(2.5.19) to convert

the integral to ESs, we choose a part of the integrand to be invariant. This part should be of form

F1(x) = logm(x) logn(1− x), with m equals to the degree of log(x) in the original integrand, n do

not exceed the degree of log(1−x) in the original integrand. In this step we have at most 3 choices

on determining n, namely n = 0, 1, 2.

Step 3. Multiple expansion. Denote F = F1F2, where F is the whole integrand after possible

manipulations in step 1, F1 the invariant part determined in step 2. We have F2 a combination of

products of terms belong to the set:{1

x,

1

1− x,

1

x+ 1,

1

1− x2

, log(1− x), log(x+ 1), log(

1− x

2

),Lin(x),Lin

(x2

)}Where by combination we mean the integral is composed of several integrals with different weights

(see examples below). Separate F2, expand each term other than 1x into elementary power series,

exchange the order of evaluation, we get a at most quadruple sum with the summand an integral

consistent with Prop. 5. In this step we have only 1 choice for the process of integration is definite.

30

Step 4. Converting into multiple harmonic series. This is straightforward if we use Prov. 5 to

evaluate the integral in rational/harmonic terms. In this step we have only 1 choice for the process

of integration is definite.

Step 5. Cauchy simplification. After step 4 we arrive at a multiple sum w.r.t at most 4 sum-

mation indexes. If there’s only 1 index, it’s already a combination of ESs hence the procedure is

finished. If there are 2 indexes, go to the next step. If there are more than 2 indexes, consider 2

manipulations: (1) Sum w.r.t all indexes with rational summands to reduce the weight. (2) Con-

sider all index pairs (j, k), check whether their Cauchy product is expressible in harmonic terms

with a new index m, if so, replace (j, k) with m in the summation to reduce the weight. Carry

out (1)(2) until it’s not reducible any more. If the resulting sum is double, go to the next step,

otherwise discard this sum and stop the procedure. In this step we have a great deal of choices to

simplify the sum, but much of them will be discarded.

Step 6. Reduction to ESs. If we go through step 5, we will have a double series in hand. Denote

the index of summation as (j, k). If the summand is rational functions of j, k, sum w.r.t either of

the indexes first to finish the procedure. If the summand is rational to j but harmonic to k, sum

w.r.t j also finishes. If we have all harmonic terms with index j+k and other parts rational, invoke

Cauchy product again to finish the procedure. For other cases (e.g. the sum involves HkHj+k),

discard it. In this step we have 1 or 2 choices for using iterated summation or Cauchy simplification.

Fix a weight 5 PLI that belongs to Q, consider the tree of choices that we would make through

step 1∼6 of the procedure above. If there exist a branch of this tree that is not ended with ’dis-

carded’ in step 5∼6, we have reduced the PLI to ESs successfully. Since all weight 5 ESs are already

evaluated, we readily obtained the closed-form of this PLI. If all branches are discarded, we get

nothing new. Now carry out the procedure for every PLI in Q to obtain independent relations

giving PLI closed-forms directly. We show some typical examples:

A successful example: Consider PLI(1, 0, 1; 21; 2) =∫ 1

0Li2(x) log(1−x) log(x+1)

x+1 dx.

Step 1: Modulo known LIs, we only need to evaluate∫ 1

0Li2(1−x) log(1−x) log(x+1)

x+1 , so let t→ 1−x.

Step 2: The problem boils down to evaluating∫ 1

0log(2)Li2(x) log(x)

1− x2dx and

∫ 1

0

Li2(x) log(x) log(1− x2 )1− x2

dx.

Set log(x) to be invariant in both 2 integrals. Making use of double expansion the weight 4 integral

is easily solved. Now we deal with the latter one.

Step 3: Expand Li2(x), log(1− x

2

), 1

1− x2with 3 independent index j, k, l.

31

Step 4: Make use of Prop. 5(1).

Step 5: Consider Cauchy product of the summation w.r.t k, l. The convolutional term is har-

monic hence the triple sum is reduced to double (or we may expandlog(1− x2 )

1− x2directly in step 3 to

obtain the double sum).

Step 6: Denote the Cauchy index replacing k, l as m. The double sum we have in hand is∑∞j=1

∑∞m=1

Hmj22m(j+m+1)2 . Sum w.r.t j first (this is nothing but the elementary sum occurred in

proof of Prop. 6(3)), we reduced this sum to a combination of three GESs already known. Hence

PLI(1, 0, 1; 21; 2) = −2Li5

(1

2

)− Li4

(1

2

)log(2) +

23π2ζ(3)

96− 15ζ(5)

64

−21

16ζ(3) log2(2)− 1

40log5(2) +

5

72π2 log3(2)− 11

720π4 log(2)

Unsuccessful examples: Readers may verify that PLI(1, 0, 1; 22; 2), PLI(2, 0, 0; 22; 2) are un-

solvable using this procedure. More specifically, it is impossible to make choices in the procedure

above, to avoid the multiple sum containing summand of form HkHj+k or its alternating analogue,

hence in step 6 they must be discarded. In fact these two integrals are evaluated nontrivially as

we put all relations generated by this section together. This reveals the necessity of a systematic

approach providing linear relations.

4.8 Solution

All linear relations generated by section 3 and 4 forms a equation system, from which all ESs and

PLIs with weight ≤ 5 are explicitly solved thus Theorem 1 is proved.

Note: Based on Prop. 7(1)(2)(3) and all LI/PLIs computed, we may add the following

Li2(x2),Li2(1− x),Li2

(x

x− 1

),Li2

(x

x+ 1

)

to the set of 6 polylog terms with new PLIs remain in AW for corresponding W . As an example,

see [15] for evaluation of∫ 1

0

Li2( xx−1 )Li2( x

x+1 )x dx. These new PLIs will be of great use in section of

QPLI below.

In fact, there exists a more essential way of proving Theorem 1 using MZV decomposition,

which is implicitly outlined in [4, 5, 6, 18]. It is of great complexity compared to our methods

32

above. Since we focus on elementary proofs, its explanation will be omitted. Moreover, we estab-

lish all QLI/QPLI results, and all but 10 QES results using MZV-free methods below. Only in the

last part of solution, 10 QESs will be solved by applying MZV theory.

5 QLI

There are 14, 50, 129 QLIs for weight 2, 3, 4 respectively.

5.1 Logsine integrals and contour deformation

5.1.1 LSI, PLSI, ITF

We introduce logsine integrals (abbr. LSIs) as follow:

LSI(a, b, c; d) =

∫ π2

0

xa logb(2 sin(x)) logc(2 cos(x)) cotd(x) dx

Here a, b, c ≥ 0, d = 0,±1. The weight of an LSI is defined as W = a+ b+ c+ 1.

Proposition 8. All convergent LSIs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW ∪ πAW−1 over Q.

Here πS = {πs|s ∈ S}, A0 = {1}.

Proof. Consider F0(x) = l(0;x)kl(1;x)ml(2;x)n

f(p;x) with all logs principal, integrate along the contour

encircling the upper unit disc. Map the (−1, 0) part back to (0, 1) via t → −x, parametrize the

semicircular part by t → e2ix. Since log(−x) = log(x) + iπ on upper (−1, 0) and log(1 + e2ix) =

log(2 cos(x)) + ix, log(1− e2ix) = log(2 sin(x)) + i(x− π

2

)on (0, π2 ), we have that:∫ π

2

0

F (x)Gl(x) dx = LI(k,m, n; l)−m∑j=0

(m

j

)(iπ)jLI(n,m− j, k; 2− l)

Where F (x) = (2ix)m(log(2 sin(x)) + i

(x− π

2

))k(log(2 cos(x))+ ix)n, G0(x) = cot(x)+ i, G1(x) =

−2i and G2(x) = tan(x)− i. Taking </= yields a LI-LSI relation. Now consider all F0 to build up

the equation system, from which all LSIs desired are solved modulo known LIs. �

Clarification: There’s no complete table for LSIs in this article. Readers may compute them

by using Prop. 8 themselves. Several of LSIs will be used later in section 8. Also note that this

solution naturally extends to higher weights.

33

Though Prop. 8 is already a complete solution, we may also apply Fourier expansion. Since

∞∑k=1

(−1)k−1 cos(2kx)

k= log(2 cos(x)),−

∞∑k=1

cos(2kx)

k= log(2 sin(x))

hold on (0, π2 ) [13], we see immediately that∫ π

2

0xn log(2 sin(x)) dx or

∫ π2

0xn log(2 cos(x)) dx are

given closed-forms using elementary results of∫ π

2

0xmeinx dx and Fubini theorem. This is naturally

extended to the integral on (0, π4 ), see subsection 5-12 for applications.

Another way of solving LSIs is to differentiate the following formula [13] w.r.t v, a:∫ π2

0

cos(ax) cosv−1(x) dx =π

2vvB(a+v+1

2 , −a+v+12

)By which all LSIs of form

∫ π2

0x2n logm(2 cos(x)) dx,

∫ π2

0x2n+1 tan(x) logm(2 cos(x)) dx are solved.

Similarly, differentiate the following formula w.r.t p (for its proof, substitute tan(x)→ t then refer

to Mellin transform subsection below):∫ π2

0

x tanp(x) dx =1

4π csc

(πp2

)(ψ(0)

(1− p

2

)− 2ψ(0)(1− p)− γ

)We obtain closed-forms of

∫ π2

0x logn(tan(x)) dx and

∫ π2

0x cot(x) logn(tan(x)) dx, which yield LSI

relations after expansion.

We define poly-logsine integrals (abbr. PLSIs) as an integral on (0, π2 ), with its integrand FG

with F = xa logb(2 sin(x)) logc(2 cos(x)) cotd(x), G a product whose terms belong to the set

{Cl2(2x),Cl2(4x),Li2

(− tan2(x)

),Ti2(tan(x))

}They arise in parametrizations of L(2, k;x), k = 1, 2, 5, 6 via substitution x→ e2it in PLIs [14]:

Li2 (x) = Li2(e2it)

= iCl2(2t) + t2 − πt+π2

6

Li2 (−x) = Li2(−e2it

)= i

(1

2Cl2(4t)− Cl2(2t)

)+ t2 − π2

12

Li2

(±1− xx+ 1

)= Li2 (∓i tan(t)) =

1

4Li2(− tan2(t)

)∓ iTi2 (tan(t))

Deforming contours like before, PLSIs can be evaluated.

34

Furthermore, by x → tan(t) and repeated integration by parts, it’s possible to convert the in-

verse tangent family (abbr. ITF)∫ ∞0

tan−1(x)k logm(x2 + 1

)xl (x2 + 1)

n dx

to combination of LSIs hence obtain their closed-forms. Differentiating∫∞

0xa−1

(x+1)a+bdx = B(a, b)

or integrating logm(1+iz)zn along the upper plane also generate relations between them.

5.1.2 QLSI and QLI

Quadratic logsine integrals (abbr. QLSIs) are defined as:

QLSI(a, b, c) =

∫ π4

0

xa logb(2 sin(x)) logc(2 cos(x))dx

The name ’logsine’ originate from [10]. QLSIs are involved in solution of certain QLIs. For instance,

by x→ tan(t) we have∫ 1

0

logm(x) logn(x2 + 1

)x2 + 1

dx = (−2)n∫ π

4

0

logm(tan(t)) logn(cos(t)) dt

In our case m + n ≤ 3 so that brute force may be used. Expand RHS using log(tan(t)) =

log(sin(t))− log(cos(t)), deform contour via z → e2it like before, QLSIs are converted into complex

log integrals∫ i

1· · · dz, which are completely solvable by Mathematica (using F1 ∼ F4 in subsection

2-1). This method is also applicable for another type of QLI:∫ 1

0logm(x) tan−1(x)n

x2+1 dx. There’s also

no complete table for QLSIs in this article.

5.2 Inverse tangent family

Start from a integral in ITF, map (1,∞) part to (0,1) via t → 1x , after simplification on logs and

tan−1(x) (note tan−1(

1x

)+tan−1(x) = π

2 ) we obtain a QLI relation. Now consider all ITF integrals.

5.3 Polylog special values

Apparently Lin(±1),Lin(±i) can be represented by ζ, η, β, ψ(n). Moreover we have (proved by plug-

ging in special values in formulas of Prop. 7 and [14]):

35

Li2(1 + i) =π2

16+ i

(C +

1

4π log(2)

),Li2

(1

2+i

2

)= i

(C − 1

8π log(2)

)+

5π2

96− 1

8log2(2)

<(Li3(1 + i)) =35ζ(3)

64+

1

32π2 log(2),<

(Li3

(1 + i

2

))=

35ζ(3)

64+

log3(2)

48− 5

192π2 log(2)

=(

Li3

(1 + i

2

))+ =(Li3(1 + i)) =

7π3

128+

3

32π log2(2)

=(Li4(1 + i))−=(

Li4

(1 + i

2

))=

1

64π log3(2) +

7

256π3 log(2)

Below is the only nontrivial pair of special values.


<(Li4(1 + i)) = −5Li4

(12

)16

+97π4

9216− 5 log4(2)

384+

1

48π2 log2(2)

<(

Li4

(1

2+i

2

))=

∞∑k=1

∑[ k2 ]l=0(−1)l

(k2l

)k42k

=5Li4

(12

)16

+343π4

92160+

log4(2)

96− 5

768π2 log2(2)

In which [a] denotes the integer part of a.

Proof: Two formulas are equivalent due to inversion formula of Li4(z). Consider evaluating

QLI(225; 4) in 2 ways:

(1) QLI(225; 4)→∫ π

4

0

t log2(tan(t)) dt→ QLSIs

Where QLSIs are evaluated by brute force in the subsection 5-1-2.

(2) QLI(225; 4)→ · · ·+∞∑n=1

(−1)nH2n

n3→ · · · <

( ∞∑n=1

inHn

n3

)

Where we have used double expansion like in subsection 4-7, then a simplified version of Prop. 4(3).

Equating 2 forms generated by 2 methods (use Mathematica for simplicity) gives the closed-from

of <(Li4(1 + i)) and completes the proof. �

36

5.4 Brute force

5.4.1 Class 1

By writing log(x2 + 1

), 2i tan−1(x) as log(1+ix)±log(1−ix), all QLIs with W ≤ 3 are decomposed

into several integrals of form∫ 1

0log(a+x) log(b+x)

c+x dx, which are trivial due F3, subsection 2-1.

5.4.2 Class 2

Moreover, due to F1, F2, F4, subsection 2-1, all integrals of form∫log2(A(x)) log(B(x))

A(x)dx,

∫log2(A(x)) log(B(x))

B(x)dx,

∫logn(C(x))

g(p;x)dx

(here A(x), B(x) ∈ Z = {1, x, 1 ± x, 1 ± ix}, C(x) = P (x)Q(x) with P (x), Q(x) ∈ Z, p 6= 1) can be

calculated by brute force as well. For former two we simply use F2, F4, while the latter boils

down to transformation z → C(x), partial fraction decomposition outside the log (since the inverse

D = C−1 is also a fractional transformation, the outside R(z) = D′(z)g(p;D(z)) is rational), and usage of

F1. Consider all possible A,B,C, p, expand the expression, take </= to get QLI relations. Also

some of the QLIs are solved directly in this way, say QLI(555; 3). One may try on these examples:∫ 1

0

log(1− ix) log2(x+ 1)

1− ixdx,

∫ 1

0

log2(1 + ix) log(1− x)

1 + ixdx

∫ 1

0

log3(

1−x1+ix

)x

dx,

∫ 1

0

x log3(

x1+ix

)x2 + 1

dx,

∫ 1

0

log3(

1+ix1−ix

)x+ 1

dx

All can be done without much effort with the help of Mathematica and subsection 5-3.


Evidently the following are expressible in terms of ζ, η, β,Lik for arbitrary n:∫ 1

0

logn(x)

x2 + 1dx,

∫ 1

0

x logn(x)

x2 + 1dx,

∫ 1

0

x logn(x2 + 1

)x2 + 1

dx,

∫ 1

0

tan−1(x)n

x2 + 1dx

By series expansion and calculating primitives. Based on subsection 2-2 and these four, we may

also evaluate the following in a general sense, using x→ x2 and integration by parts:∫ 1

0

logn(x2 + 1

)x

dx,

∫ 1

0

x log(x) logn(x2 + 1

)x2 + 1

dx,

∫ 1

0

log(x2 + 1

)logn(x)

xdx

37

∫ 1

0

tan−1(x) logn(x)

xdx,

∫ 1

0

log2(x2 + 1

)log2n(x)

xdx,

∫ 1

0

x log(x2 + 1

)log2n−1(x)

x2 + 1dx

One may write down exact formulas themselves. Now use them to solve QLIs directly.

5.6 Feynman’s trick on Mellin transform

Proposition 10. Denote

f(s) =1

4π sec

(πs2

)(ψ(0)

(1− s

2

)− ψ(0)

(1

2

))

g(s) = 2β

(1− s

2

)csc(πs

2

)+ 2β

(2− s

2

)sec(πs

2

)− 2π csc(πs)

Then we have∫ 1

0

tan−1(x) log2n+1(x)

x2 + 1dx =

1

2lims→0

∂2n+1f(s)

∂s2n+1− 1

4π(2n+ 1)!β(2n+ 2)

∫ 1

0

x tan−1(x) log2n(x)

x2 + 1dx =

1

2(2n)!β(2n+ 2) +

π(1− 2−2n

)(2n)!ζ(2n+ 1)

22n+3− 1

2lims→0

∂2nf(s)

∂s2n

∫ 1

0

tan−1(x) log2n(x)

x+ 1dx =

1

2(2n)!β(2n+ 2) +

1

4π(1− 2−2n

)(2n)!ζ(2n+ 1)− 1

16π lims→0

∂2ng(s)

∂s2n

Proof. Consider Mellin transform of tan−1(x)x+1 , tan−1(x)

x2+1 . Take the latter as the example: let

M(s) =

∫ ∞0

xs−1 tan−1(x)

x2 + 1dx, J(a, s) =

∫ ∞0

xs−1 tan−1(ax)

x2 + 1dx

then by Feynman’s trick and proof of Prop. 2(6) we get

∂J

∂a=

∫ ∞0

xs

(x2 + 1) (a2x2 + 1)dx =

π(1− a1−s) sec

(πs2

)2 (1− a2)

Integrate w.r.t a using the following (see [13])∫ 1

0

xu − xv

1− xdx = ψ(0)(v + 1)− ψ(0)(u+ 1)

38

we get J . Differentiate w.r.t s, substitute t → 1x for (1,∞) part on RHS and assign appropriate

values of s gives the first two formulas. The last one is similar, see [15]. �

Now use them to solve QLIs directly, in our case QLI(225; 5), QLI(225; 3).


In spirit of subsection 2-3, generalize F to∏5m=1 k(m;x)A(m). Now consider all possible F .


Similar to subsection 2-4, substitute x → 1−xx+1 in integral of F =

∏5m=1 k(m;x)A(m)

g(p;x) , where p 6= 2.

Using

tan−1(x) + tan−1

(1− xx+ 1

)=π

4, log

((1− xx+ 1

)2

+ 1

)= log

(2(x2 + 1

)(x+ 1)2

)we may split the integrand to obtain QLI relations (after possible decomposition 1−x

(1+x)(1+x2) →1

1+x −x

1+x2 ). Now consider all possible F .

5.9 Power substitution

For each LI, substitute x → t2, then expand logn(1 − t2) via binomial formula (and possibly de-

compose t1−t2 ) to get QLI relation. Now consider all LIs.

5.10 Weierstrass substitution

For each LSI, substitute x → 2 tan−1(t). Since (sin(x), cos(x)) →(

2t1+t2 ,

1−t21+t2

), dx → 2 dt

1+t2 , we

get a QLI relation after simplification. Now consider all LSIs.

5.11 Parametric integration

This method only generates one relation. By (keyhole) contour integration we may show∫ ∞0

log2(x)

(x2 + 1) (a+ x)dx =

π2a

8 (a2 + 1)− log3(a)

3 (a2 + 1)− π2 log(a)

3 (a2 + 1)(a > 0)

Integrate a on (0,1), expand the RHS integrals,∫∞

0log(x+1) log2(x)

x2+1 dx is computed. Now map the

39

(1,∞) part to (0, 1).

5.12 Fourier expansion

We may solve∫ 1

0tan−1(x)n

x dx and∫ 1

0x tan−1(x)n

x2+1 dx by Fourier expansion after x → tan(t). The

former becomes∫ π

4

0tn(tan(t) + cot(t)) dt, then

∫ π4

0tn−1 log(sin(t)) dt,

∫ π4

0tn−1 log(cos(t)) dt after in-

tegration by parts, which are completely solved using Fourier series in subsection 5-1-1. The latter

boils down to∫ π

4

0tn tan(t) dt either. See also [15] for evaluation of

∫ 1

0

log(1−x2) tan−1(x)2

x2+1 dx using

Fourier expansion twice.

5.13 Beta derivatives

5.13.1 Class 1

Similar to subsection 2-5, all integrals of form∫ 1

0

logm(x) logn(1−x4)g(p;x) dx (p = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) are solv-

able. For instance, when p = 3 we write 1x+1 = −x3+x2−x+1

1−x4 , substitute x4 → t then split it into

4 integrals expressible via Beta derivatives. On the other hand, we may expand logn(1 − x4) =

(log(1− x) + log(x+ 1) + log(x2 + 1))n to obtain a QLI relation. Now consider all m,n, p.

5.13.2 Class 2

Another variation is to multiply both sides of the equality

log(x2 + 1

)1∓ x

=

(x3 ± x2 ± x+ 1

)log(1− x4

)1− x4

−(±x+ 1) log

(1− x2

)1− x2

with logm(x) and integrate. Therefore∫ 1

0

log(x2+1) logm(x)

1∓x dx, in our case QLI(224; 1), QLI(224; 3),

are evaluated by Beta derivatives using x2 → t, x4 → t on RHS.


5.14.1 Class 1

Similar to subsection 2-6, consider integrating

F1(z) =logk(1− z) logm(z) logn(z + 1)

1 + z2or F2(z) =

logk(1− z) logm(z) logn(z + 1)

z(1 + z2)

40

along large upper semicircular contour with all logs principal. Residue theorem yields∫ ∞+0i

−∞+0i

Fk(z)dz = 2πiRes(Fk, i)

Split LHS into 4 parts by branch points 0,±1, use x → ±t, x → ± 1t to map them to (0, 1), after

expansion and taking </= we obtain a linear relation. Now consider all possible F1, F2.

5.14.2 Class 2

Alternatively, consider integrating

F (z) =logk(1− z) logm(z) logn(1 + z) logs(1 + iz) logt(1− iz)

z(1 + z)

along large quartercircular contour encircling the first quadrant, with all logs principal. Cauchy

theorem yields∫∞

0F (z)dz −

∫ i∞0

F (z)dz = 0. Split the integral into 4 parts by 0, 1, i, use x →t, x → 1

t , x → it, x → it to map them to (0, 1), after expansion and taking </= we obtain a linear

relation. Now consider all possible F .

Take F (z) = log(1−z) log(1+z) log(1+iz)z(1+z) as an example, after routine simplification we have

∫ 1

0

−(x

x2 + 1−

i

x2 + 1)(log(1−x)−log(x)+iπ)

(1

4log

2(x2

+ 1)− log(x) log

(x2

+ 1)

+ log2(x) + tan

−1(x)

2 − π tan−1

(x) +π2

4

)

−(1

x−

i

x2 + 1−

x

x2 + 1) log(1−x)

(1

4log

2(x2

+ 1)

+ tan−1

(x)2

)+

(1

x−

1

x+ 1

)log(1−x) log(x+1)

(1

2log(x2

+ 1)

+ i tan−1

(x)

)+

1

x+ 1(log(1− x)− log(x)− iπ)(log(x+ 1)− log(x))

(1

2log(x2

+ 1)− log(x)− i tan

−1(x) +

πi

2

)dx = 0

Now expand this expression and take </= to obtain 2 QLI relations.

Note: In fact we have a ‘Beta’ use of contour integration, that is, integrate logm(z) logn(1−z)z(1−z) along

(0,∞)→ (0, 0)→ (1, 0)→ (1,∞). Since it only generates superfluous relations, we won’t elaborate

more here.


The procedure of multiple expansion in subsection 4-7 can be naturally extended to QLIs, since

log(x2 + 1

), tan−1(x), 1

x2+1 ,x

x2+1 , and products like log(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x), tan−1(x)2, tan−1(x)

x2+1 have

41

elementary or (quadratic) harmonic power series. Finally, if not discarded, set x → i in all gener-

ating functions in Prop. 4, take </= to see whether the resultant sum is included.

Take QLI(115; 2) for an example. After the procedure we get quadratic sums∑∞k=0

(−1)kH(2)2k+1

(2k+1)2 ,∑∞k=0

(−1)k(H2k+1)2

(2k+1)2 , which are directly solved by setting x → i in Prop. 4(1)(2), taking imagi-

nary parts and using Prop. 9 for simplification. Moreover, using Prop 4. and Prop. 5(3)(4),

QLI(125; 2), QLI(114; 2), QLI(124; 2) can be evaluated similarly.

5.16 Solution

Solving the equation system of QLI relations generated by this section, all 193 QLIs with weight ≤ 4

are given closed-forms. Moreover, one may observe there are essentially two types of closed-forms in

QLIs with fixed weight. Take W = 4, then 68 QLIs lie in the subspace spanned by 8 constants in the

extended basis B4 over Q, in which those five in A4 are included. The remaining 61 QLIs are com-

pletely expressible by other 8 constants in B4. This phenomenon of separation will extend to QPLIs.

6 QPLI

There are 20, 152 QPLIs with weight 3, 4 respectively.

6.1 Brute force

Some QPLIs can be calculated by brute force, for instance∫ 1

0Ti2(x) tan−1(x)

x dx. For each QPLI,

check by Mathematica whether the premitive is solvable and evaluate it if so.


See [15] for proof of the following:

Lemma 4.∫ 1

0Ti2(x) log2n−1(x)

x+1 dx,∫ 1

0Lin+1(−x) logn(x)

x2+1 dx and∫ 1

0x logn(x)Lin+1(±x)

x2+1 dx are reducible to

ζ, β values.

Thus QPLIs of these types are solved directly.

42


Lifting up the denominator, all QPLIs with W = 3 are trivial. Generally, in spirit of subsec-

tion 2-3, generalize F to∏5m=1 k(m;x)A(m)

∏8k=1

∏Nn=2 L(n, k;x)b(n,k) (in W = 4 case it is of

form L(4, a;x), L(3, a;x)k(b;x), L(2, a;x)k(b;x)k(c;x) or L(2, a;x)L(2, b;x)). For those involving

L(n, a;x), a ∈ {3, 5, 6}, after partial fractions another integration by parts lifting log(1 − x) is

needed to obtain a regular relation modulo QLIs. Now consider all possible F .

Take F = Li2(

1−x2

)Ti2(x) as an example, after the extra procedure we obtain a relation be-

tween QPLI4(8; 1; 3), QPLI4(3; 5; 2).


Similar to subsection 2-4, apply x→ 1−xx+1 in integral of F =

∏5m=1 k(m;x)A(m)∏8

k=1

∏Nn=2 L(n,k;x)b(n,k)

g(p;x)

(in W = 4 case it is of form L(2,a;x)k(b;x)g(p;x) or L(3,a;x)

g(p;x) , a ∈ {1, 2, 5, 6}). For p = 2, after partial frac-

tions, possibly another integration by parts lifting log(1− x) is needed to obtain a regular relation.

Now consider all possible F .

6.5 Polylog identities

Like in subsection 4-6, multiply both sides of Prop. 7(1) with F = logm(1−x2) logn(1+x2) logk(x)x or

x logm(1−x2) logn(1+x2) logk(x)1±x2 , Prop. 7(9) with F = 1

x2+1 or xx2+1 , Prop. 7(5)(6) with F = k(m;x)

g(p;x) ,

integrate on (0,1) to obtain relations modulo known QLIs. Now consider all 4 formulas (1)(5)(6)(9)

and all corresponding possible F .

6.6 Power substitution

Similar to subsection 5-9, for each PLI containing only Lin(±x) and log terms, substitute x → t2

then use Prop. 7(1) for decomposition, we obtain a QPLI relation (for instance taking F =Li2(x) log(1−x)

x+1 yields a relation between QPLI4(1/2; 1/3; 5)). Now consider all suitable PLIs.

6.7 Valean’s master formula

6.7.1 Class 1

In [16], by calculating Cauchy products of polylogarithms based on subsection 3-3, the following is

proved whenever |a| ≤ 1:

43

∫ 1

0

ln(t)Li2(t)

1− atdt =

Li22(a)

2a+ 3

Li4(a)

a− 2ζ(2)

Li2(a)

a

It naturally extends to the plane. Letting a→ i and taking </=, QPLI4(1; 2; 4/5) are computed.

6.7.2 Class 2

Moreover, by using a → ii−1 ,

∫ 1

0Li2(1−x) log(1−x)

1−ix dx = 11−i

∫ 1

0Li2(x) log(x)

1− ii−1x

dx is computable due to

subsection 5-3. By Prop. 7(2) the corresponding∫ 1

0Li2(x) log(1−x)

1−ix dx is also evaluated modulo QLIs,

thus giving closed-forms of QPLI4(1; 1; 4/5).


6.8.1 Class 1

Since we only discuss the weight 4 case, integrands will be restricted. Similar to subsection 5-14,

consider integrating

F1(z) =Li2(±z) log(1 + az)

1 + z2or F2(z) =

Li2(±z) log(1 + az)

z(1 + z2)

along large upper semicircular contour (here logs and polylogs are principal, a ∈ {±1,−i}), apply

residue theorem, map each part to (0,1), take </= to obtain relations. Now consider all possible

F1, F2.

For instance, take F2(z) = Li2(z) log(1−z)z(z2+1) , after routine simplification we have that:

∫ 1

0−

z

z2 + 1(log(z + 1)− log(z))

−Li2(−z) −1

2log

2(z) −

π2

6

+z

z2 + 1(log(1− z)− log(z)− iπ)

−Li2(z) −1

2log

2(z) − iπ log(z) +

π2

3

−(

1

z−

z

z2 + 1

)Li2(−z) log(z + 1) +

(1

z−

z

z2 + 1

)Li2(z) log(1− z) dz = 2πiRes (F2(z), i) = −

1

4iπ

2C +

1

2πC log(2) +

π4

192+

1

96iπ

3log(2)

6.8.2 Class 2

Alternatively, consider integrating

F (z) =Li2(az) log(1 + bz)

z(1 + z)

44

along large quartercircular contour encircling the first quadrant (here logs, polylogs are principal,

a, b ∈ {±1,±i} ), apply Cauchy theorem, map each part to (0,1), take </= to obtain relations.

Now consider all possible F .

For instance, take F (z) = Li2(z) log(1−z)z(z+1) , after routine simplification we have that:

∫ 1

0

−(

z

z2 + 1−

i

z2 + 1

)(1

2log(z2

+ 1)− log(z) + i tan

−1(z)−

iπ

2

)(−

Li2(−z2

)4

+ iTi2(z)−1

2log

2(z)−

1

2πi log(z)−

π2

24

)

−(−

z

z2 + 1−

i

z2 + 1+

1

z

)(Li2(−z2

)4

+ iTi2(z)

)(1

2log(z2

+ 1)− i tan

−1(z)

)

+1

z + 1(log(1− z)− log(z)− iπ)

(−Li2(z)−

1

2log

2(z)− iπ log(z) +

π2

3

)+

(1

z−

1

z + 1

)Li2(z) log(1− z) dz = 0

Note: In simiplifications of relations above log(1 + iz) = 12 log

(z2 + 1

)+ i tan−1(z), Li2(iz) =

14Li2

(−z2

)+ iTi2(z) are frequently used. Moreover, due to Prop. 7(4) and definition of principle

branches, we have Li2(z) = −Li2(

1z

)− 1

2 log2(z) + iπ log(z) + π2

3 on upper side of (1,∞), here

Li2(

1z

)=∑∞k=1

1k2zk

. Also reminds that Ti2(z)− Ti2(

1z

)= 1

2π log(z) for z > 0.


6.9.1 Class 1

By Prop. 3(5), 5(2) we have

∫ 1

0

Li2(ix) log(1− x)

x(1− ix)dx = −

∞∑n=1

inHnH(2)n

n

The sum is solved by Prop. 4(4) and 9. Thus, after partial fraction decomposition, expanding

Li2(ix) and taking real, imaginary parts on LHS, relations between (QPLI4(7; 1; 4), QPLI4(8; 1; 5)),

(QPLI4(7; 1; 5), QPLI4(8; 1; 4)) are deduced, modulo known QPLI4(7/8; 1; 2) (since by lifting up

Li2(x) then log(x) they boils down to QPLI4(1; 4/5; 2) then QPLI4(1; 2; 4/5) modulo QLIs, which

are solved in subsection 6-7).

45

6.9.2 Class 2

Moreover, using Prop. 3(5) again gives

∫ 1

0

Li2(−x2

)log(1− x)

x2 + 1dx =

∞∑k=0

(−1)k−1H2k+1H(2)k

2k + 1

Substitute H(2)k = −

∫ 1

0

(1−xk) log(x)

1−x dx in the sum, by Fubini we have it equals to

∫ 1

0

log(x)

(=(f(i))− =(f(i

√x))√

x

)1− x

dx =

∫ 1

0

4x log(x)(=(f(i))− =(f(ix))

x

)1− x2

dx

Where f(x) =∑∞k=1

Hkxk

k = Li2(x) + 12 log2(1 − x) by Prop. 3(6). Extracting imaginary parts

using formulas in subsection above, it is furtherly transformed into∫ 1

0

(4Cx log(x)

1− x2− 4Ti2(x) log(x)

1− x2− πx log(2) log(x)

2 (1− x2)+

2 log(x2 + 1

)log(x) tan−1(x)

1− x2

)dx

Modulo LI/QLIs and partial fractions it boils down to QPLI4(8; 2; 1/3), then QPLI4(1/2; 5; 2)

and QPLI4(1/2; 2; 4) by lifting up Li2(±x) then log(x). Since QPLI4(1/2; 2; 4) are evaluated in

subsection 6-2, 6-7, the original QPLI4(7; 1; 4) is solved directly.

By taking real parts, QPLI4(7; 1; 5) is dealt in a similar way.

6.10 Double integration

6.10.1 Class 1

The elementary identity

−∫ 1

0

x log(y)

1− xydy = Li2(x) (|x| < 1)

produces several linear relations. For instance, apply this to rewrite the expression ofQPLI4(1; 1; 5),

after Fubini and calculating∫ 1

0x2 log(1−x)

(x2+1)(1−xy) dx by brute force (here and below, indefinite integration

w.r.t x are carried out by Mathematica, easily verified by differentiation), we have:∫ 1

0

xLi2(x) log(1− x)

x2 + 1dx = −

∫ 1

0

log(y)

(∫ 1

0

x2 log(1− x)

(x2 + 1)(1− xy)dx

)dy

= −∫ 1

0

log(y)

C

y2 + 1+

Li2

(yy−1

)y (y2 + 1)

+5π2y

96 (y2 + 1)− y log2(2)

8 (y2 + 1)− π log(2)

8 (y2 + 1)

dy

46

Modulo PLI/QLIs, partial fractions and Prop. 7(3)(

Li2

(yy−1

)→ Li2(y)

), the only one remains

is∫ 1

0yLi2(y) log(y)

y2+1 dy, thus we get a relation between QPLI4(1; 1; 5), QPLI4(1; 2; 5).

3 more relations between (QPLI4(2; 1; 5), QPLI4(2; 2; 5)), (QPLI4(1; 1; 4), QPLI4(1; 2; 4)) and

(QPLI4(2; 1; 4), QPLI4(2; 2; 4)) can be obtained by double integration similarly, possibly with a

substitution x→ −x in the identity above and Prop. 7(3).

6.10.2 Class 2

Alternatively, apply this method to QPLI4(1; 3; 5) yields:

∫ 1

0

xLi2(x) log(1 + x)

1 + x2dx = −

∫ 1

0

log(y)

log terms +Li2

(y

1+y

)y(1 + y2)

−Li2

(2y

1+y

)y(1 + y2)

dy

With the part involving log terms trivially evaluated via LIs. Modulo PLI/QLIs, partial frac-

tions and Prop. 7(3)(

Li2

(yy+1

)→ Li2(−y)

)and QPLI4(2; 2; 5) (evaluated in subsection 6-2),

the∫ 1

0log(y)

Li2( y1+y )

y(1+y2) dy part is solved.∫ 1

0log(y)

Li2( 2y1+y )y dy is also solved by lifting up log2(y)

2 so

only J =∫ 1

0y log(y)

Li2( 2y1+y )

1+y2 dy remains. For J , integrate by parts twice (lifting firstly 12 log(1 + y2)

then 12Li2(−y2)) to eliminate Li2

(2y

1+y

)term, modulo QLIs it boils down to evaluation of∫ 1

0

log

(1− y1 + y

)Li2(−y2)

ydy,

∫ 1

0

log

(1− y1 + y

)Li2(−y2)

1 + ydy

The former two∫ 1

0log (1± y) Li2(−y2)

y dy are also reduced to subsection 6-2 after integrating by

parts twice (lifting firstly −Li2(∓y) then log(y)), moreover∫ 1

0log (1 + y) Li2(−y2)

1+y dy reduces to

QLIs by lifting up 12 log2(1 + y). Thus the final relation is between the original integral and∫ 1

0log (1− y) Li2(−y2)

1+y dy, i.e. QPLI4(1; 3; 5) and QPLI4(7; 1; 3).

2 analogous relations between (QPLI4(1; 3; 4), QPLI4(8; 1; 3)), (QPLI4(2; 3; 4), QPLI4(8; 1; 3))

can be obtained by double integration and repeated integration by parts similarly.

47

6.10.3 Class 3

Furthermore, apply this method to one involving imaginary arguments yields:∫ 1

0

Li2(x) log(1 + ix)

x2 + 1dx =

∫ 1

0

− log(y)

y2 + 1

(quadratic log terms + Li2

(y

i+ y

)− Li2

((1 + i)y

i+ y

))dy

With the quadratic log terms of form log(1 ± y), log(1 ± iy), all logs and polylogs are principal.

Denote f(y) = Li2

(yi+y

)−Li2

((1+i)yi+y

), then f ′(y) =

(i

y2+1 −y

y2+1 + 1y

)log(1−y) is of good form.

Modulo known LI/QLIs, our only interest is∫ 1

0f(y) log(y)y2+1 dy. Apply partial integration twice (lift-

ing tan−1(y) then Ti2(y)), modulo QLIs again the integral is reduced to∫ 1

0Ti2(y)f ′(y) dy, which

is a combination of QPLI4(8; 1; 2/4/5). Now, modulo QLIs again QPLI4(8; 1; 2) is equivalent to

QPLI4(1; 2; 4) (solved in subsection 6-7) by partial integration lifting −Li2(y) then log(y), while

QPLI4(8; 1; 4/5) are deduced by combining relations in subsection 6-9 (in which the original in-

tegral is not used so it’s not a circular argument). Thus we’ve evaluated the original integral i.e.

QPLI4(1; 4/5; 4) directly.

2 relations between (QPLI4(2; 4; 4), QPLI4(8; 3; 2/5)), (QPLI4(2; 5; 4), QPLI4(8; 3; 4)) can be

obtained similarly if we start from∫ 1

0Li2(−x) log(1+ix)

x2+1 dx instead.

6.10.4 Class 4

Now we make use of the generalized

Li3(x) =

∫ 1

0

x log2(y)

2(1− xy)dy (|x| < 1)

Consider QPLI4(3; 4), by Fubini theorem, rational integration w.r.t x and reflection y → 1− y:∫ 1

0

Li3(

1−x2

)x2 + 1

dx =

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

(1− x) log2(y)

2 (x2 + 1) (2− (1− x)y)dydx

=

∫ 1

0

(−πy − 4 log(2− y) + π + log(4)) log2(y)

8 (y2 − 2y + 2)dy =

∫ 1

0

log2(1− y)(πy − 4 log(y + 1) + log(4))

8 (y2 + 1)dy

Plug in QLI values, the desired QPLI4(3; 4) is solved directly.

Note that QPLI4(4; 4) can be computed in the same way.

48

6.10.5 Class 5

Now we make use of a new kernel:

Li2(−x2

)=

∫ 1

0

4x2y log(y)

x2y2 + 1dy (|x| < 1)

Apply this to another involving imaginary arguments yields:∫ 1

0

Li2(−x2

)log(1 + ix)

x2 + 1dx =

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

4x2y log(1 + ix) log(y)

(x2 + 1) (x2y2 + 1)dydx

=

∫ 1

0

2i log(y)

1− y2

(quadratic log terms + Li2

(y

y − 1

)− Li2

((1 + i)y

y − 1

)− Li2

(y

y + 1

)+ Li2

((1 + i)y

y + 1

))dy

By Prop. 7(3) and known LI/PLI/QLIs, the part involving quadratic log and Li2

(yy±1

)are directly

evaluated. Thus, up to a constant factor −i, the only one remains is∫ 1

02h(y) log(y)

1−y2 dy, where

h(y) = Li2

((1 + i)y

y − 1

)− Li2

((1 + i)y

y + 1

), h′(y) =

log(

1−iyy+1

)y(y + 1)

−log(

1+iy1−y

)(1− y)y

Apply partial integration using:

K(y) =

∫2 log(y)

1− y2dy = Li2(−y)− Li2(y)− log(1− y) log(y) + log(y + 1) log(y) +

π2

4

We have∫ 1

02h(y) log(y)

1−y2 dy boils down to∫ 1

0K(y)h′(y) dy, which is decomposed into combination of

QPLI4(1/2; ·; 1/2/3) after separation, appropriate partial integration lifting − log(1 − y), modulo

LI/PLI/QLIs. Thus, we obtain 2 independent relations between the original QPLI4(7; 4/5; 4) and

these QPLI4(1/2; ·; 1/2/3). In fact, by combining all relations generated by subsection 6-1∼6-10-4,

all QPLIs of form QPLI4(1/2; ·; 1/2/3) are solved so QPLI4(7; 4/5; 4) is evaluated.

Another relation between QPLI4(7; 3; 4), QPLI4(2; 5; 5) and QPLI4(2; 4; 4) can be obtained

similarly if we consider applying this kernel on∫ 1

0Li2(−x2) log(1+x)

x2+1 dx instead. Indeed, in this case

the remaining∫ 1

0K(y)h′(y) dy will be replaced by

∫ 1

0K(y)l′(y) dy, where:

l(y) = Li2

(y

−i+ y

)− Li2

(2y

−i+ y

)− Li2

(y

i+ y

)+ Li2

(2y

i+ y

)

l′(y) = −i log

(y2 + 1

)y2 + 1

+2iy tan−1(y)

y2 + 1− 2i tan−1(y)

y

49

From which the mentioned relation is extracted.

6.11 Solution

One may verify that subsection 6-1∼6-10 readily offers 171 independent relations, from which 160

QPLIs (W ≤ 4) out of the total 172 are solved, while the remaining 12 QPLIs are connected by 11

relations (generated by subsection 6-3, 6-4, 6-5, 6-10-3, 6-10-5). In other words, only one needs to

be solved explicitly to complete the system. The 12 (up till now) unsolved are:

QPLI4(2/3/4/6; 4; 4), QPLI4(2/3/4/6; 5; 5)

QPLI4(8; 3; 5), QPLI4(8; 4; 3), QPLI4(7; 3; 4), QPLI4(7; 5; 3)

Apparently,∫ 1

0Li2(−y) log(1−iy)

1−iy dy is evaluable, since by partial integration it boils down to integral∫ 1

0log2(1−iy) log(y+1)

y dy then QLIs. On the other hand, taking its real part gives a relation between

QPLI4(2; 4; 4), QPLI4(2; 5; 5) (essentially this is subsection 6-3).

Now we evaluate∫ 1

0Li2(−y) log(1+iy)

1−iy dy directly to obtain the last nontrivial relation. Apply dou-

ble expansion using Prop. 3(2)(5), sum w.r.t j in spirit of Prop. 5, after an index change we arrive at:∫ 1

0

Li2(−x) log(1 + ix)

1− ixdx =

∞∑j=1

∞∑k=1

(−1)jikH̃k

j2(j + k + 1)

=

∞∑k=1

ikH̃k

((−1)k(log(2)− H̃k+1)

(k + 1)2− π2

12(k + 1)+

log(2)

(k + 1)2

)

=

∞∑k=1

ik−1

(H̃k −

(−1)k−1

k

)((−1)k−1(log(2)− H̃k)

k2+

log(2)

k2− π2

12k

)

Modulo ζ, η values and up to constant factors, we have to deal with 5 sums:

S1 =

∞∑n=1

inH̃n

n, S2/3 =

∞∑n=1

(±i)nH̃n

n2, S4 =

∞∑n=1

inH̃n

n3, S5 =

∞∑n=1

in(H̃n

)2

n2

Using Prop. 3(7), 4(7) and all closed-forms in subsection 5-3, plug in x→ ±i, S1, S2, S3 are solved.

50

For S4, by using H̃n =∫ 1

01−(−x)n

x+1 dx and partial integration we have

∞∑n=1

inH̃n

n3=

∫ 1

0

Li3(i)− Li3(−ix)

x+ 1dx =

∫ 1

0

log(x+ 1)

x

(Li2(−x2

)4

+ iTi2(x)

)dx+

1

16iπ3 log(2)

Since QPLI4(7/8; 3; 2) belong to 160 QPLIs already solved, S4 is finished. To conquer S5, recall

Prop. 5(1), 3(9), exchange the order:

∞∑n=1

in(H̃n

)2

n2=

∫ 1

0

− log(x)

x

∞∑n=1

(H̃n

)2

(−ix)n dx

=

∫ 1

0

(− 1

x+

i

1 + ix

)log(x)

(Li2(−ix) + 2Li2

(ix+ 1

2

)− 2Li2

(1

2

)+A(x)

)dx

Here A(x) = 2 log(1−ix) log(1+ix)−2 log(2) log(1+ix). Apparently∫ 1

0

(− 1x + i

1+ix

)log(x)A(x)dx

trivially reduces to LI/QLIs. Moreover, by using partial integration lifting 12 log2(x), polylogs in∫ 1

0

(Li2(−ix)+2Li2( ix+12 )−2Li2( 1

2 )) log(x)

x dx part are eliminated hence also solved via QLIs. Further-

more,∫ 1

0

Li2( 12 ) log(x)

1+ix dx,∫ 1

0Li2(−ix) log(x)

1+ix dx are trivial since QPLI4(7/8; 2; 4/5) also belong to 160

known QPLIs. Therefore, up to constants the only one left is∫ 1

0

Li2( ix+12 ) log(x)

1+ix dx. Like in subsec-

tion 6-10-1, with the aid of

Li2(

12 (ix+ 1)

)1 + ix

= −∫ 1

0

log(y)

2− (1 + ix)ydy (|x| < 1)

We apply double integration

∫ 1

0

Li2(ix+1

2

)log(x)

1 + ixdx = −

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

log(x) log(y)

2− (1 + ix)ydydx = −i

∫ 1

0

Li2

(iy

2−y

)log(y)

ydy

Lift up 12 log2(y) again, let y → 1− y and simplify, we have it equals to

− i2

∫ 1

0

log2(1− y) log(

(1−i)(1+iy)y+1

)1− y

dy − i

2

∫ 1

0

log2(1− y) log(

(1−i)(1+iy)y+1

)y + 1

dy

Obviously they reduce to LI/QLIs after separation and a possible partial integration lifting up

− 13 log3(1− y) for the former, so S5 is computed.

51

Combining S1 ∼ S5, desired∫ 1

0Li2(−x) log(1+ix)

1−ix dx is solved. Add it up to∫ 1

0Li2(−x) log(1−ix)

1−ix dx

above then take real part, QPLI4(2; 4; 4) hence other 11 unknowns are calculated, finishing evalu-

ation of all 172 QPLIs with weight ≤ 4. Thus, Theorem 2 is proved.

7 QES

We solve 83 QESs with W ≤ 4 (out of 93) and 28 non-alt QESs with W = 5 using non-MZV

approach. 10 tough alternating weight 4 QESs remain are deduced with help of MZV theory [24].

7.1 Non-alternating case

For each non-alternating QES, write Hn = H2n − H̃2n,1np = 2p

(2n)p , use

∞∑n=1

f(2n) =1

2

( ∞∑n=1

f(n)−∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1f(n)

)

and possible index change to decompose it into alternating ESs. For instance we have

QES(11, 31, 31; 22) =

∞∑n=1

(H2n − H̃2n) (H2n) 2

(2n+ 1)2=

∞∑n=0

1− (−1)n−1

2

(Hn − H̃n) (Hn) 2

(n+ 1)2

=

∞∑n=0

1− (−1)n−1

2

(Hn+1 − H̃n+1 + (−1)n

n+1 −1

n+1

)(Hn+1 − 1

n+1

)2

(n+ 1)2

=

∞∑n=1

1 + (−1)n−1

2

(Hn − H̃n + (−1)n−1

n − 1n

) (Hn − 1

n

)2

n2

Expand this expression. Since all ESs of weight 5 are recorded/computed in section 3, the QES is

solved directly. Now do the same to all non-alt QESs.

7.2 Generating functions

For each formula in Prop. 3 or 4, let z → i, take </= (like in subsection 5-15, 6-9-1, etc) then

apply formulas of subsection 5-3 to simplify, we obtain QES relations after possible decomposition

on H2n+1, H̃2n+1. Now consider all formulas.

52

7.3 QLI/QPLI expansion

For each QLI/QPLI, carry out the procedure of subsection 4-7 to obtain QES relations. For in-

stance, double expansion on Li2(x),log(x2+1)x2+1 gives

QPLI4(1, 4; 4) =

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1Hn

(− H2n

(2n+ 1)2+

π2

6(2n+ 1)− 1

(2n+ 1)3

)

Which directly leads to QES(11, 31;−22) modulo trivial terms. As another example, one may

verify QPLI4(7, 4; 4), QES(11, 12;−12) are connected by double expansion too. Now it’s natural

to consider all QLI/QPLIs and all possible choices in the expansion procedure.

7.4 Integral representation

For each formula in Prop. 5 (and other integral representations), multiply both sides by appropri-

ate harmonic factor, sum up w.r.t n, use Prop. 3 (or other generating functions) to simplify LHS,

reduce them to known LI/PLI/QLI/QPLIs via various manipulations (sub, IBP, etc).

Other integral representations are those featuring single harmonic terms, for instance

Hn =

∫ 1

0

1− xn

1− xdx, H̃

(2)n =

∫ 1

0

− (1− (−x)n) log(x)

x+ 1dx,H

(3)2n =

∫ 1

0

(1− x2n

)log2(x)

2(1− x)dx

or those composite ones like (readers may complete them)∫ 1

0

x2n

x+ 1dx = Hn −H2n + log(2),

∫ 1

0

xn

x+ 1dx = (−1)n−1

(H̃n − log(2)

)∫ 1

0

xn−1 log(x) log(x+ 1) dx,

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log(1− x) log(x+ 1) dx,

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log2(x+ 1) dx

Other generating functions are derived from Prop. 3, i.e. consider f(±za), f(za) ± f(−za) or

</=f(iza) where a ∈ {1, 2, 12}, for instance

∞∑n=1

(−1)nxn

2n+ 1=

tan−1 (√x)−

√x√

x,

∞∑n=0

x2n+1

(2n+ 1)2=

1

2(Li2(x)− Li2(−x))

∞∑n=1

H2nx2n = −1

2

(log(1− x)

1− x+

log(x+ 1)

x+ 1

),

∞∑n=1

(−1)nH(2)2n x

2n =Li2(−x2

)4 (x2 + 1)

− xTi2(x)

x2 + 1

53

The general process is rather tricky and complicated so we only show one example. Consider

QES(21, 31; 22). Modulo trivial QES(21; 32) we only need to calculate∑∞n=0

H2n+1H̃n(2n+1)2 . By manip-

ulating Prop. 3(15) one have (all polylogs principal)

F (x) =

∞∑n=0

(−1)nH2n+1x2n

(2n+ 1)2= − i

2x(−Li3(−ix) + Li3(ix) + Li3(ix+ 1)− Li3(1− ix)

−Li2(ix+ 1) log(1 + ix) + Li2(1− ix) log(1− ix)− 1

2log(−ix) log2(1 + ix) +

1

2log(ix) log2(1− ix)

)Hence, recall H̃n =

∫ 1

0

2x(1−(−x2)n)

x2+1 dx, it is direct that∑∞n=0

H2n+1H̃n(2n+1)2 =

∫ 1

02x(−F (x)+F (i))

x2+1 dx.

Expand the integrand, apply partial integration to Li3(··· )x2+1 terms then Prop. 7(2) for Li2(··· ) log(··· )

x2+1 ,Li2(··· ) tan−1(··· )

x2+1 terms, simplify and plug in QLI/QPLI values, the original sum is evaluated.


Identical to subsection 3-4, see [11] for examples and general process.

7.6 Partial fractions

Generalize subsection 3-3 to consideration of (±1)j−1(±1)k−1

f(j)ag(k)bwhere f, g ∈ {2t, 2t + 1}. For those

relations involving summand J(k)n =

∑nj=1

(−1)j−1

(2j+1)k, try subsection 7-4, i.e. use generating func-

tions/integral representations of J(k)n to solve it by QLI/QPLI.

7.7 Symmetric relations

Generalize 3-2→7-7 like 3-3→7-6. Do the same as 7-6 for J(k)n involved sums.

7.8 Solution

By combining methods listed above, all but 10 weight 4 alternating QESs are solved. As one may

notice, all integrals and sums in sections above are given closed-forms by combining MZV-free meth-

ods, but it simply terminates here, suggesting us getting help from more powerful tools. Indeed,

based on closed-forms of weight 4 level 4 MZVs [24] and QES-MZV reduction, the remaining 10

54

sums are evaluated immediately. They will be dyed blue in tables of section 9.

8 Applications

8.1 Nonhomogeneous integrals

8.1.1 NLI

Define nonhomogeneous log integrals (abbr. NLIs) as

NLI(a(0), a(1), a(2); k) =

∫ 1

0

xk2∏

m=0

l(m;x)a(m)dx

Whenever the order k ∈ Z− {−1}.

Proposition 11. All convergent NLIs with weight W = a(0) + a(1) + a(2) ≤ 5 are generated by

∪Ww=0Aw over Q.

Proof. Integrate by parts repeatedly. Suppose k is nonnegative, lift up xk to xk+1

k+1 (or xk+1−1k+1 some-

times for convergence issues) and differentiate the log terms, after splitting and partial fraction

decomposition on xk+1

1±x , it boils down to several weight W LIs and weight W − 1 NLIs. Hence an

induction on NLIs’ weight completes the proof. For negative k the technique is similar. �

In fact, by partial fraction decomposition and method above, all convergent integrals of form∫ 1

0

∏2m=0 l(m;x)a(m)

(1−x)pxq(x+1)r dx are evaluable.

8.1.2 NPLI, NQLI, NQPLI

Similarly we define nonhomogeneous polylog integrals, nonhomogeneous quadratic log integrals

and nonhomogeneous quadratic polylog integrals (abbr. NPLIs, NQLIs, NQPLIs) by replacing

PLI/QLI/QPLI denominators by xk, k 6= −1. They share similar structure with NLIs, that is, com-

pletely generated by ∪Ww=0Aw(W ≤ 5) or ∪Ww=0Bw(W ≤ 4) for fixed weight W . The proof, using par-

tial integration, is identical to NLI case. Generalizations with denominator (1−x)pxq(x+1)r(x2+1)s

is also available for NQLI/NQPLIs. Also by manipulating these integrals some logsine variations

can be deduced, for instance ∫ π2

0

x cos(x) log(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x))dx

55

= 2C − 4C log(2) + 4=(Li3(1 + i)) +π2

8− π3

8+ π− 6 +

3

4π log2(2)− 2 log2(2)− 3

2π log(2) + 6 log(2)

One may define NES, NQES similarly by changing denominators of the summands. Their nonho-

mogeneous structures will be fully established by partial fractions and reindexing. Notwithstanding,

they won’t be discussed later.

8.2 Nested sums and multiple log integrals

8.2.1 NS manipulation

Some PLIs not evaluable directly in subsection 4-7 can be used to evaluate some nested harmonic

sums (i.e. NSs). For instance, by double expansion and Cauchy summation

∫ 1

0

Li2(−x) log2(1− x)

x(x+ 1)dx =

∞∑k=1

∞∑j=1

(−1)j+k−1H̃jHj+k

k2(j + k)=

∞∑m=1

(−1)m−1Hm

m

m−1∑k=1

H̃m−k

k2

LHS is known. Since∑m−1k=1

(−1)m−k

k2(m−k) is elementary and that:

m∑n=1

(−1)n−1

H̃n

n2+H̃

(2)n

n

= H̃nH̃(2)n +H(3)

n

we know

m−1∑k=1

H̃m−k

k2=

m∑n=1

H̃n

n2− H̃mH̃

(2)m − H̃(3)

m +H(3)m

Using it to simplify the first identity and plugging in ES values, we obtain the closed-form of the

following:

∞∑m=1

(−1)m−1Hm

m

m∑n=1

H̃n

n2= −10Li5

(1

2

)+π2ζ(3)

96+

277ζ(5)

32

+9

16ζ(3) log2(2) +

log5(2)

12− 1

72π2 log3(2)− 1

18π4 log(2)

Another way of solving NSs is to exploit symmetry. We have outer and inner symmetric formula:

(O)

∞∑m=1

g(m)

m∑n=1

f(n) +

∞∑m=1

f(m)

m∑n=1

g(n) =

∞∑m=1

f(m)

∞∑m=1

g(m) +

∞∑m=1

f(m)g(m)

56

(I)

∞∑m=1

f(m)

m∑n=1

g(n)

n∑k=1

h(k)+

∞∑m=1

f(m)

m∑n=1

h(n)

n∑k=1

g(k) =

∞∑m=1

f(m)

(m∑n=1

g(n)

m∑n=1

h(n) +

m∑n=1

g(n)h(n)

)

Apply these and n-ple generalizations repeatedly with all f, g, h, · · · arbitrary harmonic terms, we

obtain some relations between NSs. For example, all weight 5 RSs of form

∞∑m=1

f(m)

m∑n=1

Hn

n,

∞∑m=1

f(m)

m∑n=1

(−1)n−1 H̃n

n

with f harmonic term can be reduced to ESs directly using inner∑mn=1

Hnn = 1

2

((Hm) 2 +H

(2)m

)and its alternating analogue, while

∑∞m=1

H̃mm2

∑mn=1(−1)n−1Hn

n is evaluated by outer symmetry,

known ESs and the NS computed above.

8.2.2 MLI representation

Plenty of multiple log integrals (i.e. MLIs) are evaluable by using ES/NSs. For instance, using

H̃n =∫ 1

01−(−x)n

x+1 dx thus∑mn=1

H̃nn2 =

∫ 1

0

H(2)m −

∑mn=1

(−x)n

n2

x+1 dx, Proposition 5 and Fubini we have

∞∑m=1

(−1)m−1Hm

m

m∑n=1

H̃n

n2=

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

log(1− y)(∑∞

m=1H(2)m (−y)m −

∑∞m=1

∑mn=1

(−y)m(−x)n

n2

)(x+ 1)y

dxdy

=

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

log(1− y)(Li2(−y)− Li2(−xy))

(x+ 1)y(y + 1)dxdy

In general, we use Proposition 5 (and its alternating analogue) then exchange order repeatedly to

obtain the integral representation for certain sums.

8.3 Geometric and binomial Euler sums

8.3.1 GES

In section 3 we have made use of GES results i.e. geometric Euler sums of form:

GES(a(1), · · · , a(M); p) =

∞∑n=1

1

np2n

M∏k=1

H(a(k))n

According to Xu [19], all GESs with weight W =∑Mk=1 a(k) + p ≤ 5 and p > 0 are generated by

57

AW over Q. In fact this trivially extends to the case p = 0 by the reindex trick, for instance

1

2

∞∑n=1

(Hn) 3H(2)n

2n=

∞∑n=1

(Hn − 1

n

)3(H

(2)n − 1

n2

)2n

From which we may extract the value of LHS since all GESs on RHS with p > 0 are known. Thus

all 39 GESs with W ≤ 5 and p ≥ 0 are computed (we exclude the trivial polylog case where no

a(k) exists).

8.3.2 BES

Another generalization is binomial Euler sum (abbr, BES):

BES(a(1), · · · , a(M); p) =

∞∑n=1

(2nn

)np4n

M∏k=1

H(a(k))n

The weight is naturally defined as W =∑Mk=1 a(k) + p and p > 0 ensuring convergence. Different

from GES, we take the case where no a(k) exists into account.

Proposition 12. All 26 BESs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q.

Proof. All can be done by a single method. Denote the set of harmonic integral representations as

A, which contains 3 classes of formulas:∫ 1

0

xn−1 logk(x) dx (k ≤ 3),

∫ 1

0

(1− xn) logk(x)

1− xdx (k ≤ 3)

featuring 1nk+1 and H

(k+1)n , and∫ 1

0

xn−1 logk(x) logm−k(1− x) dx (m ≤ 4, 0 ≤ k < m)

featuring composite harmonic terms. Part of them are recorded in Prop. 5 (see also subsection 7-4)

and we tabulate the rest here.

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log2(x) log(1− x) dx = −2Hn

n3− 2H

(2)n

n2− 2H

(3)n

n+

π2

3n2+

2ζ(3)

n

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log(x) log2(1− x) dx = −2HnH(2)n

n− (Hn) 2

n2+π2Hn

3n− H

(2)n

n2− 2H

(3)n

n+

2ζ(3)

n

58

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log4(1− x) dx =6 (Hn) 2H

(2)n

n+

8HnH(3)n

n+

(Hn) 4

n+

3(H

(2)n

)2

n+

6H(4)n

n

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log(x) log3(1− x) dx =3HnH

(2)n

n2+

3 (Hn) 2H(2)n

n+

6HnH(3)n

n+

(Hn) 3

n2

−6ζ(3)Hn

n− π2 (Hn) 2

2n+

2H(3)n

n2+

3(H

(2)n

)2

n+

6H(4)n

n− π2H

(2)n

2n− π4

15n∫ 1

0

xn−1 log2(x) log2(1− x) dx =4HnH

(2)n

n2+

4HnH(3)n

n+

2 (Hn) 2

n3− 2π2Hn

3n2

−4ζ(3)Hn

n+

2H(2)n

n3+

4H(3)n

n2+

2(H

(2)n

)2

n+

6H(4)n

n− 2π2H

(2)n

3n− 4ζ(3)

n2− π4

90n

∫ 1

0

xn−1 log3(x) log(1− x) dx =6Hn

n4+

6H(2)n

n3+

6H(3)n

n2+

6H(4)n

n− π2

n3− 6ζ(3)

n2− π4

15n

These can be proved by using Beta derivatives like in Prop. 5. Now, denote

fk(x) =

∞∑n=1

(2nn

)xn

4nnk, fhj(x) =

∞∑n=1

(2nn

)Hnx

n

4nnk

binomial generating functions (k = 0, 1, 2, 3; j = 0, 1) and the set of these 6 functions as B, then we

have closed-form expressions:

(1)(2)(3) f0(x) =1−√

1− x√1− x

, f1(x) = 2 log(2)− 2 log(√

1− x+ 1), fh0(x) =

2 log(√

1−x+12√

1−x

)√

1− x

(4) fh1(x) = 2Li2(1−√

1− x)

+ 2Li2(−√

1− x)

+ 2Li2

(1

2

(√1− x+ 1

))+ log2

(√1− x+ 1

)− log(4) log

(1−√

1− x)

+ log(1− x) log(1−√

1− x)

+2 log

(1√

1− x+ 1

)log(1−√

1− x)− 2 log

(1√

1− x+ 1

)log(√

1− x+ 1)− π2

6+ log2(2)

(5) f2(x) = −2Li2

(1

2

(√1− x+ 1

))− log2

(√1− x+ 1

)59

+2 log(2) log(x)− 2 log

(1

2

(1−√

1− x))

log(√

1− x+ 1)

+π2

3− 3 log2(2)

(6) f3(x) = 2Li3

(1

2

(1−√

1− x))− 2Li3

(1

2

(√1− x+ 1

))− 2Li2

(1

2

(1−√

1− x))

log(x)

+2Li2

(1

2

(1−√

1− x))

log(√

1− x+ 1)− 2Li2

(1

2

(√1− x+ 1

))log(x) + 2Li2

(1

2

(√1− x+ 1

))log(√

1− x+ 1)

−1

3log

3 (√1− x+ 1

)− 3 log

2(2) log(x)− 2 log

2(2) log

(√1− x− 1

)+ log

2(2) log

(√1− x+ 1

)+ log(4) log

2(x)

− log(4) log2 (√

1− x− 1)

+ log(1−√

1− x)

log2 (√

1− x+ 1)

+ log(4) log(2) log(x)− log(8) log(2) log(√

1− x+ 1)

+ log(2) log(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x+ 1)+

1

3π2

log(x)−log(4) log(1−√

1− x)

log(x)−2 log(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x+ 1)

log(x)

+ log(4) log(x) log(√

1− x− 1)

+ log(4) log(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x− 1)− log(4) log

(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x+ 1)

+ log(8) log(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x+ 1)−log(4) log

(√1− x− 1

)log(√

1− x+ 1)+2ζ(3)+

4 log3(2)

3+2iπ log

2(2)−

7

3π2

log(2)

In which we applied binomial expansion for f0, the identity fh0(x) =∫ 1

0f0(x)−f0(tx)

1−t dt, brute

force and repeated use of L(f) in Prop 3.

Fix a formula in A and a (harmonic-)binomial term belongs to { (2nn )

4nnk,

(2nn )Hn4nnj }, (k = 0, 1, 2, 3; j =

0, 1). Muptiply both sides of the chosen formula with this term, sum w.r.t n, use the corresponding

generating functions in B to convert LHS into an integral and RHS a combination of BESs. Sub-

stitute x→ 1−x2 in LHS, the integral can be decomposed into PLIs (in all cases here, with weight

≤ 5), since the integrand only contains logs and polylogs of form Li2(−x),Li2(1− x),Li2(

1±x2

)or

Li3(

1±x2

)which are main focuses of section 4 (with a possible reflection on the second). Since LHS

is known now, we obtain a relation of BESs on RHS. Consideration of all possible choices in A,B

completes the evaluation. �

Here are two examples of the procedure above. Composite relations generated by, say the kernel∫ 1

0xn−1 log2(x) log2(1− x) dx, are cumbersome thus omitted here.

BES(4; 1) = −1

3

∫ 1

0

(f1(1)− f1

(1− x2

))log3

(1− x2

)x

dx,

f1(1)− f1

(1− x2

)= 2 log(x+ 1)

BES(13; 1) =

∫ 1

0

(fh1(1)− fh1

(1− x2

))log2

(1− x2

)x

dx,

fh1(1)− fh1

(1− x2

)= −2Li2

(x+ 1

2

)− 2Li2(1− x)− 2Li2(−x)− log2(x+ 1) + log(4) log(1− x)

−2 log

(1

x+ 1

)log(1− x)− 2 log(1− x) log(x) + 2 log

(1

x+ 1

)log(x+ 1) +

π2

2− log2(2)

60

Evidently they are evaluable via weight 5 LI/PLIs.

8.3.3 IBES

Now we deal with inverse binomial Euler sum (abbr, IBES):

IBES(a(1), · · · , a(M); p) =

∞∑n=1

4n

np(

2nn

) M∏k=1

H(a(k))n

The weight is defined as W =∑Mk=1 a(k) + p as usual and p > 1 ensuring convergence. We also

take the case where no a(k) exists into account.

Proposition 13. All 14 IBESs with weight W ≤ 5 are generated by AW over Q.

Proof. Instead of PLI usage in Prop. 12, LSI/PLSI (subsection 5-1) will play an important role

here. First of all, recall generating functions of inverse sine power from [8]:

(T1)(T2) d(x) =

∞∑n=1

4nxn

n(

2nn

) =2√x sin−1 (

√x)√

1− x, f(x) =

∞∑n=1

4nxn

n2(

2nn

) = 2 sin−1(√x)2

(T3) g(x) =

∞∑n=1

4nH(2)n xn

n2(

2nn

) − ∞∑n=1

4nxn

n4(

2nn

) =2

3sin−1

(√x)4

IBES(0; 2) = f(1) is trivial. Multiply both sides of (T2) with logk(x)x and integrate on (0,1).

Let x→ sin2(u), plug in LSI values, we get closed-forms of IBES(0; p) for 3 ≤ p ≤ 5.

By using Hn =∫ 1

01−xn1−x dx for IBES(1; 2), Prop. 5(2) for IBES(1; 3) it is clear that

IBES(1; 2) =

∫ 1

0

f(1)− f(x)

1− xdx, IBES(1; 3) =

∫ 1

0

−f(x) log(1− x)

xdx

Substitute x → sin2(u) in both identities, plug in LSI values, IBES(1; 2/3) are readily solved.

Similar to IBES(1; 2) we have IBES(3; 2) =∫ 1

0(f(1)−f(x)) log2(x)

2(1−x) dx, which is computed via LSI

under the same substitution.

Moreover, by manipulating (T3) we have

IBES(2; 2) = g(1) + IBES(0; 4), IBES(2; 3) =

∫ 1

0

2g(x)

3xdx+ IBES(0; 5)

61

IBES(2; 2) is solved directly. For the latter, let x→ sin2(u) then plug in LSI value.

Furthermore, similar to solution of IBES(1; 3), multiply Prop. 5(3)(4)(5) by appropriate fac-

tors, sum w.r.t n gives∫ 1

0

d(x) log2(1− x)

xdx = IBES(11; 2)+ IBES(2; 2),

∫ 1

0

f(x) log2(1− x)

xdx = IBES(11; 3)+ IBES(2; 3)

∫ 1

0

f(x) log(x) log(1− x)

xdx = IBES(1; 4) + IBES(2; 3)− π2

6IBES(0; 3)

−∫ 1

0

d(x) log3(1− x)

xdx = 3IBES(12; 2) + IBES(111; 2) + 2IBES(3; 2)

While another use of (T3) gives∫ 1

0

g(1)− g(x)

1− xdx = IBES(12; 2)− IBES(1; 4)

All 5 integrals on LHS boils down to known LSIs using x → sin2(u). Solving this system yields

closed-forms of last 5 IBESs, i.e. IBES(11; 2/3), IBES(1; 4), IBES(12; 2), IBES(111; 2), complet-

ing the proof. �

8.3.4 QBES, IQBES (pFq part 1)

We have quadratic binomial Euler sum and its inverse (abbr. QBESs, IQBESs):

QBES(a(1), · · · , a(M); p) =

∞∑n=1

((2nn

)4n

)21

np

M∏k=1

H(a(k))n

IQBES(a(1), · · · , a(M); p) =

∞∑n=1

(4n(2nn

))21

np

M∏k=1

H(a(k))n

Here p > 0 for QBES and p > 2 for IQBES, ensuring convergence. Defining weight W =∑Mk=1 a(k) + p as usual, there are 7 QBESs and 3 IQBESs for W ≤ 4, with 3 and 2 harmonic-

free sums respectively.

Part 1: First of all we compute 5 harmonic-free sums.

62


(1) IQBES(0; 3) = 4 4F3

(1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2,

3

2, 2; 1

)= 8πC − 14ζ(3)

(2) IQBES(0; 4) = 4 5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2,

3

2, 2, 2; 1

)= 64π=(Li3(1 + i)) + 64Li4

(1

2

)− 233π4

90+

8 log4(2)

3− 20

3π2 log2(2)

(3) πQBES(0; 1) =1

4π 4F3

(1, 1,

3

2,

3

2; 2, 2, 2; 1

)= 4π log(2)− 8C

(4) πQBES(0; 2) =1

4π 5F4

(1, 1, 1,

3

2,

3

2; 2, 2, 2, 2; 1

)= 64=(Li3(1 + i))− 2π3 − 12π log2(2)

(5) πQBES(0; 3) =1

4π 6F5

(1, 1, 1, 1,

3

2,

3

2; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2; 1

)

= −512=(Li4(1 + i)) + 4πζ(3) + 16π log3(2) + 8π3 log(2) +ψ(3)

(14

)4

−ψ(3)

(34

)4

Proof. (1): By Clausen formula or manipulating (T1) above we have 3F2

(1, 1, 1; 3

2 , 2;x)

=sin−1(

√x)

2

x .

Multiply both sides by 12√

1−x , integrate on (0,1). Now expand 3F2 for LHS (see [13] for general

Euler integral of pFq) and let x→ sin2(t) for RHS.

(2): Use the same technique in (1), integrate by parts (lifting up 12x√

1−x ), one have

5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2,

3

2, 2, 2; 1

)=

∫ 1

0

x 4F3

(1, 1, 1, 1; 3

2 , 2, 2;x)

2x√

1− xdx

=

∫ 1

0

−(log(1−√

1− x)− log

(√1− x+ 1

))sin−1 (

√x)

2

2xdx

Now substitute x→ sin2(t), t→ 2 tan−1(u), apply partial fractions and plug in QLI values.

(3): By repeated integration we obtain 3F2

(1, 1, 3

2 ; 2, 2;x)

= − 4 log( 12 (√

1−x+1))x . Multiply both

sides by 2√x

π√

1−x , integrate on (0,1). Now expand 3F2 for LHS and let x→ sin2(t) for RHS.

63

(4)(5): Using L∗(f) =∫ x0f(t) dt

x on (3) it’s clear that

4F3

(1, 1, 1,

3

2; 2, 2, 2;x

)= −

4Li2(

12

(√1− x+ 1

))x

+2π2

3x

−4 log

(1−√

1− x)

log(

12

(√1− x+ 1

))x

−2 log

(18

(√1− x+ 1

))log(

12

(√1− x+ 1

))x

5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1,

3

2; 2, 2, 2, 2;x

)=

4Li3(12

(1−√

1− x))

x−

4Li3(12

(√1− x+ 1

))x

+4Li2

(12

(1−√

1− x))

log(√

1− x+ 1)

x+

4Li2(12

(√1− x+ 1

))log(√

1− x+ 1)

x

−4Li2

(12

(1−√

1− x))

log(−x)

x−

4Li2(12

(√1− x+ 1

))log(−x)

x+

4ζ(3)

x+

2iπ3

3x+

2 log3(2)

3x

−2 log3

(√1− x+ 1

)3x

+log(4) log2(2)

x−

2 log2(2) log(1−√

1− x)

x−

4 log2(2) log(√

1− x− 1)

x

−2 log2(2) log

(√1− x+ 1

)x

+2 log

(1−√

1− x)

log2(√

1− x+ 1)

x−

log(16) log2(√

1− x− 1)

x

−log2(4) log

(1−√

1− x)

x−

log2(4) log(√

1− x+ 1)

x+

log(16) log(2) log(1−√

1− x)

x− 2π2 log(2)

3x

+2π2 log(x)

3x+

log(16) log(−x) log(√

1− x− 1)

x+

log(16) log(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x− 1)

x

+log(16) log(−x) log

(√1− x+ 1

)x

+log(16) log

(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x+ 1)

x

−4 log

(1−√

1− x)

log(√

1− x+ 1)

log(−x)

x−

log(16) log(√

1− x− 1)

log(√

1− x+ 1)

x

We only establish (5), (4) is relevantly trivial. Multiply both sides of the 5F4 formula by 2√x

π√

1−x ,

integrate on (0,1). Expand 5F4 for LHS, let x→ sin2(t), t→ 2 tan−1(u) for RHS. After simplifica-

tions and modulo QLIs, there only left several nontrivial ones of form∫ 1

0

Li2 (p(x)) log(q(x))

x2 + 1dx,

∫ 1

0

Li3(p(x))

x2 + 1dx→

∫ 1

0

tan−1(x)Li2(p(x))

r(x)dx

Where p ∈ { 1x2+1 ,

x2

x2+1}, q ∈ {x, x2 + 1}, r ∈ {x, x

2+1x }, and the ‘→’ denotes IBP for 2 Li3 terms

and partial fractions. Now, use Prop. 7(2), 7(4) and 7(2) again, take care of complex arguments,

modulo trivial QLI terms we reduce Li2(p(x)) to ordinary Li2(−x2

):

Li2

(x2

x2 + 1

)→ Li2

(1

x2 + 1

)→ Li2

(x2 + 1

)→ Li2

(−x2

)Finally plug in QPLI to complete the proof. �

64

Part 2: Now there left only one IQBES. We will establish that

IQBES(1; 3) = 32C2−32πC log(2)+128π=(Li3(1+i))+64Li4

(1

2

)−413π4

90+

8 log4(2)

3−32

3π2 log2(2)

Indeed, by using Prop. 5(2),∑∞n=1

(4n

(2nn )

)2xn

n2 = 4x 3F2

(1, 1, 1; 3

2 ,32 ;x)

then a shifted representa-

tion∑∞n=0

(4n

(2nn )

)2xn

(2n+1)2 = 3F2

(1, 1, 1; 3

2 ,32 ;x)

and Prop. 5(2) again, one have

IQBES(1; 3) = −4

∫ 1

0

log(1− x) 3F2

(1, 1, 1;

3

2,

3

2;x

)dx,

∫ 1

0

log(1−x) 3F2

(1, 1, 1;

3

2,

3

2;x

)dx =

∞∑n=0

∫ 1

0

(4n(2nn

))2xn log(1− x)

(2n+ 1)2dx = −

∞∑n=0

(4n

(2n+ 1)(2nn

))2Hn+1

n+ 1

Due to another shifted sum∑∞n=0

(4x)n

(2n+1)(2nn )

=sin−1(

√x)√

x(1−x), Prop. 5(2) again and xz → u, we have

∑n≥0

4nHn+1

(n+ 1)(2n+ 1)(

2nn

)zn = −∫ z

0

arcsin√u√

u(1− u)log(1− u

z)du

z

Therefore, by using 1

(2n+1)(2nn )

= B(n+ 1, n+ 1), the generating function above and Fubini:

−∞∑n=0

(4n

(2n+ 1)(

2nn

))2Hn+1

n+ 1= −

∫ 1

0

∑n≥0

4nHn+1

(n+ 1)(2n+ 1)(

2nn

) (4x(1− x))n dx

=

∫ 1

0

dx

∫ 4x(1−x)

0

arcsin√u√

u(1− u)log(1− u

4x(1− x))

du

4x(1− x)

=

∫ 1

0

arcsin√u√

u(1− u)du

(∫ 12 (√

1−u+1)

12 (−√

1−u+1)log(1− u

4x(1− x))

dx

4x(1− x)

)

According to subsection 2-1, by brute force we have 8 times of the inner x integral equals to

r(u) = −8Li2

(1

2

(1−√

1− u))

+2Li2

(2√

1− u√1− u− 1

)+4Li2

(1−√

1− u√1− u+ 1

)−2Li2

(2√

1− u√1− u+ 1

)+ log2

(1−√

1− u)

+ log2(√

1− u+ 1)− 2 log

(1−√

1− u)

log(1− u) + log(16) log(u)

− log(4)(− log

((√1− u+ 1

)u)

+ log(1−√

1− u)

+ log(8))− log(16) log

(√1− u+ 1

)+2 log(1− u) log

(√1− u+ 1

)− 6 log

(1−√

1− u)

log(√

1− u+ 1)− 2 log2(2) + log2(4)

65

To calculate the resulting∫ 1

0r(u) arcsin

√u

8√u(1−u)

du, apply u → sin2(t), t → 2 tan−1(v). After simplifica-

tions and modulo QLIs, there only left several nontrivial ones of form∫ 1

0Li2(p(x)) tan−1(x)

x2+1 dx where

p ∈ {x2, 1−x2, 1− 1x2 ,

x2

x2+1}. By using Prop. 7 (1)(2)(4) flexibly and take care of branches, modulo

trivial QLI terms we reduce Li2 to ordinary arguments:

Li2(1− x2

)→ Li2

(x2)→ Li2 (±x) , Li2

(1− 1

x2

)→ Li2

(1

x2

)→ Li2

(x2)→ Li2 (±x)

Li2

(x2

x2 + 1

)→ Li2

(1

x2 + 1

)→ Li2

(x2 + 1

)→ Li2

(−x2

)Finally plug in QPLI to complete evaluation of IQBES(1; 3).

Part 3: Now we compute the rest 4 QBESs. Firstly, in [23] it is proved that

πQBES(1; 1) = 32C log(2)− 64=(Li3(1 + i)) +11π3

6+ 4π log2(2)

So we only need to focus on evaluation of πQBES(11; 1), πQBES(2; 1), πQBES(1; 2).


(1) πQBES(1; 2) = 1024=(Li4(1 + i))− 256 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))

+πζ(3) +16

3π log3(2)− 8π3 log(2) +

2

3π3 log(2)−

25ψ(3)(

14

)48

+25ψ(3)

(34

)48

(2) πQBES(2; 1) =20π2C

3− 128C log2(2)− 1024=(Li4(1 + i))

+512 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))− 14πζ(3)− 64

3π log3(2) +

25ψ(3)(

14

)48

−25ψ(3)

(34

)48

(3) πQBES(11; 1) = −4π2C

3+ 12πζ(3)−

ψ(3)(

14

)48

+ψ(3)

(34

)48

Proof. In spirit of [23], if f(x) =∑∞n=0 cnPn(2x − 1), then by Bonnet recursion formula [13] and

solving diffrence equation, one may prove

f(x)

x=

∞∑n=0

(−1)n(2n+ 1)

(∫ 1

0

f(x)

xdx+ 2

n∑m=1

1

m

∞∑k=m

(−1)kck

)Pn(2x− 1)

66

Therefore, recall FL expansions of Li2(x), log(x) log(1 − x), log2(1 − x) in literature above, after

simplification using subsection 8-2 we have

Li2(x)

x=

∞∑n=0

AnPn(2x−1),log(x) log(1− x)

x=

∞∑n=0

BnPn(2x−1),log2(1− x)

x=

∞∑n=0

CnPn(2x−1)

An = (−1)n(2n+ 1)

(ζ(3)− π2

3Hn + 2H̃

(3)n + 4HnH̃

(2)n − 4

n∑m=1

(−1)m−1

m2Hm

)

Bn = (−1)n(2n+ 1)

(ζ(3) +

π2

3Hn − 2H̃

(3)n − 4HnH̃

(2)n − 2H(3)

n + 4

n∑m=1

(−1)m−1

m2Hm

)

Cn = (−1)n(2n+ 1)

(2ζ(3) + 4H̃

(3)n − 8

n∑m=1

(−1)m−1

m2Hm

)

Now, by using Prop. 5(2)(3)(4) and that π∑∞n=1

((2nn )4n

)2

xn = 2K(x) − π, the following three

equations are established:

πQBES(1; 2) = −∫ 1

0

π log(1− x)

x

∞∑n=1

((2nn

)4n

)2xn

ndx = πQBES(0; 1)Li2(1)−

∫ 1

0

(2K(x)− π)Li2(x)

xdx

∫ 1

0

(2K(x)− π) log(1− x) log(x)

xdx = πQBES(1; 2) + πQBES(2; 1)− π3

6QBES(0; 1)

∫ 1

0

(2K(x)− π) log2(1− x)

xdx = πQBES(11; 1) + πQBES(2; 1)

From which we observe that it suffices to compute∫ 1

0

K(x)Li2(x)

xdx,

∫ 1

0

K(x) log(1− x) log(x)

xdx,

∫ 1

0

K(x) log2(1− x)

xdx

(modulo known QBESs and trivial integrals) to complete evaluation of 3 QBESs. Using the classical

K(x) =∑∞n=0

2Pn(2x−1)2n+1 , 3 expansions above and orthogonal identity

∫ 1

0Pp(2x− 1)Pq(2x− 1) dx =

δp,q2p+1 , they boils down to

∞∑n=0

2An(2n+ 1)2

,

∞∑n=0

2Bn(2n+ 1)2

,

∞∑n=0

2Cn(2n+ 1)2

67

Modulo weight 4 QESs and up to constant factors, the only notrivial sum in all three series above

is a quadratic NS (i.e. QNS):

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1

2n+ 1

n∑m=1

(−1)m−1

m2Hm →

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1

n2Hn

n∑m=1

(−1)m−1

2m+ 1→

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1

n2Hn

n∑m=1

(−1)m−1

2m− 1

Where we have used outer symmetry (subsection 8-2) and reindexing for two ‘→’ repsectively,

transforming the QNS into a extended QES modulo trivial sums, i.e.

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1

2n+ 1=

4− π4

,

∞∑n=1

(−1)n−1Hn

n2=

5ζ(3)

8,

∞∑n=1

Hn

n2(2n+ 1)= −2ζ(3)− 4 log2(2)

Since∑nm=1

(−1)m−1

2m−1 =∫ 1

0

1−(−x2)n

x2+1 dx, plug in Prop. 4(15) and simplify by Prop. 7, the extended

QES is equal to∫ 1

0

1

8 (x2 + 1)

(8Li3

(x2)− 8Li3

(1− x2

)+ 8Li2

(1− x2

)log(1− x2

)+ 4 log

(x2)

log2 (1− x2)+ 13ζ(3))dx

Lift up tan−1(x) for∫ 1

0

Li3(1−x2)x2+1 dx to reduce Li3 to Li2, use Prop. 7(2) to have Li2(1 − x2) →

Li2(x2), IBP again, plug in QPLI values, 3 QBESs are solved. �

Thus we have finished evaluation of 10 desired sums. Note that as solving∑∞n=0

2An(2n+1)2 , · · · , 3

weight 4 QES values we invoke i.e. QES(11, 22;−12), QES(13;−12), QES(23;−12) are not among

10 MZV-dependent ones, that is, these QBESs are established without MZV usage.

8.4 Related problems

We present several minor problems with basically increasing complexity.

8.4.1 Symmetric PLI

Denote D = {(x, y) : 0 < x < 1, 0 < y < 1−xx+1} a region symmetric about y = x. Let

D1 = D ∩ {(x, y) : y > x}, we have

−∫ 1

0

Li2(

1−xx+1

)log(1− x)

xdx =

∫D

log(1− x) log(1− y)

xydxdy

= 2

∫D1

log(1− x) log(1− y)

xydxdy = 2

∫ √2−1

0

(Li2(x)− Li2

(1−xx+1

))log(1− x)

xdx

68

Hence by using∫ Li2(x) log(1−x)

x dx = −Li2(x)2

2 and value of PLI(1, 0, 0; 25; 1):

∫ √2−1

0

Li2(

1−xx+1

)log(1− x)

xdx = −1

2Li2(√

2− 1)

2−Li4(12

)2− 7

16ζ(3) log(2)+

7π4

2880− 1

48log4(2)+

1

48π2 log2(2)

A similar consideration for integrand Lin(x)Lin(y)xy yields the general formula:

(∫ √2−1

0

−∫ 1

√2−1

)Lin(x)Lin+1

(1−xx+1

)x

dx = 2

(∫ √2−1

0

−∫ 1

√2−1

)Lin(x)Lin+1

(1−xx+1

)x2 − 1

dx = Lin+1

(√2− 1

)2

8.4.2 MT of PLI

We present a master formula of PLI:

∫ 1

0

F (x)

(Li2

(x− 1

x+ 1

)+ Li2

(1− xx+ 1

))dx =

∫ 1

0

(1−√

1− x2)F(

1−√

1−x2

x

)Li2

(1−xx+1

)2x2√

1− x2dx

For the proof, rewrite LHS as 12

∫ 1

0F (x)Li2

(x2−2x+1x2+2x+1

)dx then let 1

t →x2+1

2x . For instance, take

F =Li2( 1−x

x+1 )x+1 and plug in PLI(0, 0, 0; 25, 25/26; 2) gives:

∫ 1

0

(1−√

1− x2)

Li2

(1−xx+1

)Li2

(x+√

1−x2−1x−√

1−x2+1

)x√

1− x2(x−√

1− x2 + 1) dx

= 8Li5

(1

2

)+8Li4

(1

2

)log(2)−13π2ζ(3)

16−ζ(5)

4+

7

2ζ(3) log2(2)+

4 log5(2)

15−2

9π2 log3(2)+

1

36π4 log(2)

8.4.3 Inverse ES

Some inverse sums are computed below, where by inverse we mean the summand contains ζ(k)−H(k)n

or η(k)− H̃(k)n , that is, the tail of generalized harmonic sums.

Consider∑∞n=1(−1)n

(log(2)− H̃n

)5

. By Abel’s summation (lift up (−1)n by partial summa-

tion and take difference of the other part) we have it equals to:

∞∑n=1

1

2

((−1)n−1 − 1

)(( (−1)n−1

n+ log(2)− H̃n

)5 −

(log(2)− H̃n

)5

)

69

Expand the RHS, all terms are weight 5 ESs except another inverse sum∑∞n=1

(log(2)−H̃n)4

n . Apply

Abel summation again and split the summand, the new sum can be reduced to ESs either. Therefore

we have:

∞∑n=1

(−1)n(

log(2)− H̃n)

5 = 10Li5

(1

2

)+10Li4

(1

2

)log(2)−157ζ(5)

16+

35

8ζ(3) log2(2)−2 log5(2)

3− 5

18π2 log3(2)

Using the same method we are able to deduce that:

∞∑n=0

(log(2)− H̃n

)5 = −20Li4

(1

2

)− 45

4ζ(3) log(2) +

259π4

1440+

5 log4(2)

3+

5

12π2 log2(2)

Here the reason why a ’quintic’ sum yields a ’quartic’ value is the existence of n after summation

by parts once. Combining 2 results and make use of∫ 1

0xn

x+1 dx = (−1)n(

log(2)− H̃n

), we conclude:

∞∑n=0

(log(2)− H̃2n

)5 =

∫(0,1)5

dV

(u+ 1)(v + 1)(x+ 1)(y + 1)(z + 1)(1− (uvxyz)2)

= −10Li4

(1

2

)+ 5Li5

(1

2

)+ 5Li4

(1

2

)log(2)− 157ζ(5)

32+

35

16ζ(3) log2(2)

−45

8ζ(3) log(2) +

259π4

2880+

log5(2)

6+

5 log4(2)

6− 5

36π2 log3(2) +

5

24π2 log2(2)

8.4.4 High weight ES

Consider the integral∫ 1

0

log(x) log(1−x2) sin−1(x)4√

1−x2dx. Using sin−1(x)4 = 3

2

∑∞n=1

H(2)n−1(2x)2n

n2(2nn )

[8], t →

x2, Beta derivatives and that

ψ(0)(n+ 1) = Hn − γ, ψ(0)

(n+

1

2

)= 2 (H2n −Hn − log(2))

The integral is converted to harmonic sum. On the other hand, by x → sin(t) and expanding

2∫ π

2

0t4(log(2 sin(t)) − log(2))(log(2 cos(t)) − log(2)) dt, the integral is also reduced to several LSIs

with weight at most 6. Evaluate them using weight 6 LI [1] and contour deformation (subsection

5-1) gives:

∞∑n=1

H(2)n−1

(2 (Hn −H2n + log(2)) (Hn + 2 log(2)) +H

(2)n − π2

6

)n2

70

= −4ES(1;−5)− 4

3π2Li4

(1

2

)− 15ζ(3)2

8−π2ζ(3) log(2)− 1

4ζ(5) log(2)+

281π6

15120− 1

18π2 log4(2)+

4

45π4 log2(2)

8.4.5 High weight PLI

Using multiple expansion the following 4 integrals are reducible to Zeta values:∫ 1

0

Li3(x) log(x) log(1− x)

xdx,

∫ 1

0

Li3(x) log(x) log(1− x)

1− x dx,

∫ 1

0

Li3(x) log2(x)

1− x dx,

∫ 1

0

Li3(x) log2(1− x)

xdx

By Prop. 7(7)(8) Li3(1− 1

x

)is expressible in Li3(x),Li3(1− x) and log terms, so 4 corresponding

integrals∫ 1

0

Li3(1− 1x ) log(x) log(1−x)

x dx, · · · also Zeta expressible. Let −t → 1 − 1x , we arrive at 4

integrals on (0,∞) with integrands composed of Li3(−x) and logs. Combining 2 of them gives∫ ∞0

Li3(−x) log(x+ 1) log(

1x + 1

)x

dx = −2ζ(3)2 − 31π6

5670

Split the integral, map back to (0,1), using Prop. 7(7) and weight 6 LI values [1] we readily arrive at:∫ 1

0

Li3(−x) log(x+ 1) log(

1x + 1

)x

dx

= −ES(1;−5) +1

3π2Li4

(1

2

)+

7

24π2ζ(3) log(2)− 137π6

90720+

1

72π2 log4(2)− 1

72π4 log2(2)− ζ(3)2

8.4.6 Parseval LSI

We have an expanded logsine integral:

∫ 2π

0

(1

12π2f(x)−

1

3f(x)3 +

1

2(x− π)g(x) + h(x)

)2

+

((π − x)

2f(x)2 − f(x)g(x) +

π2(π − x)

24

)2

dx = 6πζ(3)2+979π7

11340

Where f(x) = log(2 sin

(x2

)), g(x) = Cl2(x), h(x) = Cl3(x). And a compact one:

∫ 2π

0

∣∣∣∣−1

2Li2(eix)2 − log

(1− eix

)Li3(eix)

+ Li4(eix)∣∣∣∣2 dx = 15πES(2; 6) +

4π3ζ(3)2

3− 70πζ(5)ζ(3) +

677π9

113400

71

The first one is a direct consequence of Parseval identity applied to f(x) =∑∞n=1

1nH

2neinx on

(0, 2π), Prop. 3(13), closed-form of ES(1, 1, 1, 1; 2) and elementary expansions, while the latter

makes use of Prop. 4(5) and weight 8 non-alternating ES(3, 3; 2). See [15, 20] for evaluation of 2

ESs respectively.

8.4.7 Convolutional LI

Consider∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0logn((1−x)(1−y))

(x+1)(y+1) dxdy. By binomial theorem and Prop. 1(5) we may express this

integral in terms of polylogs. On the other hand, let u → (1 − x)(1 − y), x → x, integrate

w.r.t x, we find it equals to∫ 1

0(2 log(2−u)−log(u)) logn(u)

4−u du. Using substitution u → 1 − x and∫ 1

0logn+1(u)

4−u du = (−1)n−1(n+ 1)!Lin+2

(14

)we have

∫ 1

0

log(x+ 1) logn(1− x)

x+ 3dx =

(−1)n(n+ 1)!

2

(1

n+ 1

n∑k=0

Lik+1

(1

2

)Li−k+n+1

(1

2

)− Lin+2

(1

4

))

Similarly, consider evaluating∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0log(x+1) log(y+1)(log(x+1)+log(y+1))n

xy dxdy by Prop. 1(8) and

substitution yields:∫ 2

1

f(x) logm(x) dx+

∫ 4

2

g(x) logm(x) dx = m!

m∑k=0

(k + 1)(−k +m+ 1)J(k)J(m− k)

Where J, f, g are

J(k) = −k∑j=0

logj(2)Li−j+k+2

(12

)j!

− logk+2(2)

(k + 2)k!+ ζ(k + 2)

f(x) =1

6(x− 1)

(12Li3

(1

x

)+ 12Li3(x)− 6Li2(1− x) log(x) + 6Li2

(1

x

)log(x)

−12Li2(x) log(x)− 6 log(x− 1) log2(x)− 6iπ log2(x) + π2 log(x)− 24ζ(3))

g(x) =1

12(x− 1)

(24Li3

(x2

)+ 24Li3

(2

x

)− 24Li2

(x2

)log(x

2

)− 12Li2

(1− x

2

)log(x)

+12Li2

(2

x

)log(x

4

)− 24Li3(2) + 12Li2(2) log(4) + 6 log2(2) log

(x2

)+ 12iπ log2(2)

−12 log(

1− x

2

)log2

(x2

)+ 12 log(2) log

(x2

)log

(x− 2

x

)− 21ζ(3) + 2 log3(2)

)

72

One may furtherly simplify Mathematica-generated F,G. Note that both integrals share the struc-

ture of ’convolution’.

8.4.8 Valean’s hexagram

We generalize Valean’s results [17]. Denote

X = (−1)k(

1− 2k−2n)ζ(−k+2n+1)+

−k+2n−1∑j=0

(−1)j−1ζ(j + 2)(iπ)−j−k+2n−1

(−j − k + 2n− 1)!, Y = <

(X

(2i)2n−k

)−

log(2)(π2

)2n−k(2n− k)!

A = 21−4n(2n−2)!

(22n+1

n−1∑k=1

(1− 21−2k

)ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n+ 1)−

(2n(22n − 1

)− 22n+1 + 1

)ζ(2n+ 1)

)

C1 = (2n− 2)!ζ(2n+ 1), C2 =(2−2n − 1

)(2n− 2)!ζ(2n+ 1), U = 2−2(2n−2)−3 (1− 22n) (2n− 2)!ζ(2n+ 1)

P = (2n− 2)!

(−2−2n

(1− 21−2n

)log(2)ζ(2n)−

2n−1∑k=0

β(k + 1)β(2n− k)

−2n−2∑k=1

(1− 2−k

)2−2n−1

(1− 2k−2n+1

)ζ(k + 1)ζ(2n− k) + 2nζ(2n+ 1)

)

Q = −2−4n(2n− 2)!

− (22n − 2) 2(n−1)∑

k=1

ζ(k + 1)ζ(−k + 2n)

+22n+1n−1∑k=1

(1− 21−2k

)ζ(2k)ζ(−2k + 2n+ 1) +

(−2n+ 22n+1 − 1

)ζ(2n+ 1)

)

Then we have six general formulas (Bn denotes Bernoulli numbers [13]):

(1) V1 =

∫ 1

0

Li2

(2xx2+1

)log2n−2(x)

xdx = (−1)n−1(2n− 2)!

2n−1∑k=0

Bk(2π)kY

k!

(2) V2 =

∫ 1

0

Li2

(− 2xx2+1

)log2n−2(x)

xdx = (−1)n(2n− 2)!

2n−1∑k=0

Bk(2π)k(1− 21−k)Y

k!

(3) W1 =

∫ 1

0

x log(1− x) log2n−1(x)

x2 + 1dx = −(2n− 1)

(A

8− C1

2+U

8+V1

4

)

73

(4) W2 =

∫ 1

0

x log(x+ 1) log2n−1(x)

x2 + 1dx = −(2n− 1)

(A

8− C2

2+U

8+V2

4

)

(5) T1 =

∫ 1

0

log(1− x) log(x2 + 1

)log2n−2(x)

xdx = − log(2)(2n− 2)!ζ(2n)− 2W1

2n− 1+ P

(6) T2 =

∫ 1

0

log(1 + x) log(x2 + 1

)log2n−2(x)

xdx = Q− T1

We establish V1 below. Following [17], by applying double integration, Fourier expansion of

Poisson kernel and logsine functions, we have the formula:

∫ 1

0

Li2

(2xx2+1

)log2n−2(x)

xdx = 2(−1)2n−1(2n− 1)!

∫ π2

0

log(cos(t))

( ∞∑k=1

sin(kt)

k2n−1

)dt

Now, [13] offers the Fourier expansion

∞∑k=1

sin(kt)

k2n−1=

(2π)2n−1(−1)nB2n−1

(t

2π

)2(2n− 1)!

where Bn(x) =∑nk=0Bk

(nk

)xn−k are Bernoulli polynomials. Plugging in these results we find that:

· · · = (2π)2n−1(−1)n−1

2n− 1

2n−1∑k=0

Bk(

2n−1k

) ∫ π2

0t−k+2n−1 log(cos(t)) dt

(2π)−k+2n−1

Finally, by simple induction we have∫log(z + 1) logn(z)

zdz =

n∑k=0

(−1)k−1n!Lik+2(−z) logn−k(z)

(n− k)!

Integrate log(z+1) logn(z)z along the upper unit circle (counter clockwise), parametrize z = e2ix, it is

direct that∫ π

2

0xn log(2 cos(x)) dx = <

(Z

(2i)n+1

), where

Z = (−1)n−1(1− 2−n−1

)n!ζ(n+ 2) +

n∑j=0

(−1)j−1n!(iπ)n−jζ(j + 2)

(n− j)!

Making use of this result completes the evaluation of V1. V2 is established similarly. W1,W2, T1, T2

are relevantly easy (using Prop. 1, ES/PLI/QLI general formulas and hints in [17]) so we omit the

details. These six formulas hold to arbitrary order.

74

8.4.9 Hypergeometric rhapsody (pFq part 2)

First of all, take a look at radical polylog ntegral∫ 1

0

Li3(√x)√

x(1−x)dx i.e.

∫ 1

0Li3(x)√

1−x2dx,∫ π

2

0Li3(sin(t)) dt.

Expanding Li3 and taking care of parity, we obtain a hypergeometric form. Alternatively, following

subsection 6-10-4, by double integration one have∫ 1

0Li3(x)√

1−x2dx =

∫ 1

0

log2(y)(−π√

1−y2+2 sin−1(y)+π)

2(

2y√

1−y2) dy.

Now let y → sin(t), t → 2 tan−1(u) then plug in QLI values to express it by extended basis B4.

Equating 2 forms yields

(1) 5F4

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2, 1, 1;

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2; 1

)= 8=(Li4(1+i))− 1

12π log3(2)− 3

16π3 log(2)− 1

384

(ψ(3)

(1

4

)− ψ(3)

(3

4

))

Now we focuse on QLSIs. Consider∫ 1

0log3(x)√

2−x2dx =

∫ π4

0

(log(2 sin(t))− log(2)

2

)3

dt. The RHS

reduces to QLSIs solved in subsection 5-1, while LHS is transformed into hypergeometric sum byexpanding 1√

2−x2into power series. After simplification one have

(2) 5F4

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2;

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2;

1

2

)=

1

2

√2=(Li4(1+i))+

1

16π√

2ζ(3)+1

768π3√

2 log(2)−√

2(ψ(3)

(14

)− ψ(3)

(34

))12288

Similar consideration for∫ 1

0

log2(x) sin−1(x√2

)√

2−x2dx =

∫ π4

0t(

log(2 sin(t))− log(2)2

)2

dt yields (we may

obtain the expansion for sin−1(x)√1−x2

by differentiating sin−1(x)2 = 12

∑∞n=1

(2x)2n

n2(2nn )

):

(3) 5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2, 2, 2, 2;

1

2

)= 2π=(Li3(1 + i)) +

5Li4(

12

)2

− 11π4

144+

5 log4(2)

48− 1

6π2 log2(2)

For higher weights not all QLI/QLSIs can be computed analytically. Nevertheless, the method

of expansion above can be naturally generalized here, yielding connection formulas between pFq

and Borwein LSIs (for notations of Ls see [10], which is a bit different from our QLSIs). Either of

these constants can be added to B5 representing irreducible constants:

(4) 6F5

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2;

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2;

1

2

)=

1

96

√2C log3(2)− 1

16

√2 log2(2)=(Li3(1 + i)) +

1

4

√2 log(2)=(Li4(1 + i))− 1

48

√2Ls5

(π2

)+

1

32π√

2ζ(3) log(2) +1

512π√

2 log4(2) +π3√

2 log2(2)

3072−√

2 log(2)(ψ(3)

(14

)− ψ(3)

(34

))24576

(5) 6F5

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2, 2, 2, 2, 2;

1

2

)= −1

2πC log2(2) + 2π log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))

+4

3Ls

(1)5

(π2

)+

5

2Li4

(1

2

)log(2) +

35

32ζ(3) log2(2) +

5 log5(2)

48− 5

24π2 log3(2)− 11

144π4 log(2)

75

Moreover, multiply both sides of sinh−1(√

x8

)2= 1

2

∑∞n=1

(−1)n−1xn

n22n(2nn )

by log2(x)x then integrate

on (0, 1). Let t → sinh−1(√

x8

)for LHS, use Prop. 1(1) for RHS, we deduce

∑∞k=1

(−1)k−1

k52k(2kk )

=

2∫ log(2)

2

0x2 coth(x) log2

(8 sinh2(x)

)dx. Clearly it boils down to

∫ log(2)2

0x2 coth(x) logk(sinh(x)) dx

for k = 0, 1, 2, all of which are directly solved under substitution x → 12 log(y + 1) and several

LI(0, a, b; 1/2) values. After simplification we arrive at

(6) 6F5

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2, 2, 2, 2, 2;−1

8

)= 40Li5

(1

2

)+ 24Li4

(1

2

)log(2)− 38ζ(5) + 4ζ(3) log2(2) +

19 log5(2)

30− 4

9π2 log3(2) +

7

45π4 log(2)

Furtherly, consider calculating∑∞n=1

(2nn )

n64n via Beta derivatives like in section of BES, and eval-

uating∫ 1

0log5(x)√

1−x2dx,

∫ 1

0log4(x) sin−1(x)√

1−x2dx (essentially IBES

∑∞n=1

4n

n6(2nn )

) and∑∞n=1

(−1)n−1

n62n(2nn )

in 2

ways using methods above, with the help of [1] one may deduce:

(7) 8F7

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,

3

2; 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2; 1

)= −4ζ(3)2− 16

3ζ(3) log3(2)+

4

3π2ζ(3) log(2)−24ζ(5) log(2)+

79π6

7560− 8

45log6(2)+

2

9π2 log4(2)+

1

10π4 log2(2)

(8) 7F6

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2;

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2; 1

)=π3ζ(3)

192+

3πζ(5)

32+

1

16πζ(3) log2(2) +

1

240π log5(2) +

1

288π3 log3(2) +

19π5 log(2)

11520

(9) 7F6

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2; 1

)= 2ES(1;−5)+16Li6

(1

2

)−ζ(3)2+π2ζ(3) log(2)+

31

8ζ(5) log(2)−19π6

1120+

log6(2)

45+

1

9π2 log4(2)− 19

360π4 log2(2)

(10) 7F6

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1;

3

2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2;−1

8

)= 8ES(1;−5) + 64Li6

(1

2

)+ 24Li5

(1

2

)log(2)

+4ζ(3)2 − 4

3ζ(3) log3(2) + 38ζ(5) log(2)− 43π6

540− 19

180log6(2) +

1

9π2 log4(2)− 7

90π4 log2(2)

All 4 general hypergeometric sums are generated by A6, in which methods for non-alternating (7)(8)

can be generalized to n+1Fn({1}n, 3

2 ; {2}n; 1), n+1Fn

({ 1

2}n+1; { 32}n; 1

). As a corollary, all radical

76

polylog integrals of form∫ 1

0Lin−1(x)√x(1−x)

dx i.e.∫ 1

0

Lin−1(x2)√1−x2

dx,∫ π

2

0Lin−1

(sin2(t)

)dt are trivial since up

to a constant factor it’s equivalent to n+1Fn({1}n, 3

2 ; {2}n; 1)

by expanding numerators. Moreover,

the shifted∫ 1

0Lin−1(x)

x√

1−x2dx can be reduced to generalization of (9) i.e. n+1Fn

({1}n+1; 3

2 , {2}n−1; 1)

modulo trivial pFq values, which means these integrals are also solved if we plug in high weight LI

[1] then LSI values. For further examples, see (4)(5) of next subsection.

8.4.10 FL fantasia (pFq part 3)

Apart from solving QBESs, we present some other use of FL theory (all FL expansions below

are recorded in/deducible from [23]). Firstly, in literature above 2 connection formulas between a

QBES i.e. 5F4

(12 ,

12 ,

12 ,

12 ,

12 ; 1, 3

2 ,32 ,

32 ; 1),∑∞n=1

(−1)n(H2n−Hn2 )3

2n+1 and∫ 1

2

0Li3(z)√z(1−z)

dz are proved, in

which the middle sum is made up of QES({11}k, {31}3−k;−12) (0 ≤ k ≤ 3) hence trivial. Therefore

(1) π 5F4

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2; 1,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2; 1

)= 64=(Li4(1+i))−2

3π log3(2)−π3 log(2)− 1

32

(ψ(3)

(1

4

)− ψ(3)

(3

4

))

is confirmed true. Making use of another relation and value of∫ 1

0Li3(x)√x(1−x)

dx above yields a pair

of by-products:

(2)

∫ 12

0

Li3(1− z)√z(1− z)

dz =π2C

6− C log2(2) + 56=(Li4(1 + i))− 4 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))

+πζ(3) +1

3π log3(2)− 25

24π3 log(2)−

7ψ(3)(

14

)256

+7ψ(3)

(34

)256

(2′)

∫ 12

0

Li3(z)√z(1− z)

dz = −π2C

6+ C log2(2)− 56=(Li4(1 + i)) + 4 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))

+πζ(3) + π log3(2) +17

24π3 log(2) +

7ψ(3)(

14

)256

−7ψ(3)

(34

)256

Secondly, by orthogonal identity∫ 1

0Pp(2x− 1)Pq(2x− 1) dx =

δp,q2p+1 and following FL series

K(x) =

∞∑n=0

2Pn(2x− 1)

2n+ 1, E(x) =

∞∑n=0

− 4Pn(2x− 1)

(2n− 1)(2n+ 1)(2n+ 3), Li3(x) =

∞∑n=0

AnPn(2n− 1)

A0 = ζ(3)− π2

6+ 1, A1 =

π2

4− 15

8

77

An(n ≥ 2) =2(−1)n(2n+ 1)

(∑∞k=n+3

(−1)k

k2

)n(n+ 1)

+

(n4 + n3 + 3n2 + 8n+ 4

)(2n+ 1)

n3(n+ 1)3(n+ 2)2

We may compute polylog elliptic pair∫ 1

0Li3(x)K(x) dx,

∫ 1

0Li3(x)E(x) dx in closed-forms. The lit-

erature already computes the former so we only deal with the latter here. Modulo trivial rational

sums, the representation∑∞k=n+3

(−1)k

k2 =∫ 1

0(−x)n+2 log(x)

x+1 dx and constant factors, the problem

boils down to evaluation of

∞∑n=2

An(2n− 1)(2n+ 1)2(2n+ 3)

then

∫ 1

0

x2 log(x)

x+ 1

∞∑n=2

xn

n(n+ 1)(2n− 1)(2n+ 1)(2n+ 3)dx

Let x → x2 and do partial fractions, the latter integral is decomposed into several NQLIs of form∫ 1

0xk log(x) log(1±x)

x2+1 dx, all of which are trivially evaluated due to subsection 8-1-2 and QLI (W ≤ 3)

results. Therefore we readily deduce:

(3)

∫ 1

0

Li3(x)E(x) dx =64

3C log(2)−128

3=(Li3(1+i))+

4ζ(3)

3+

4π3

3−16π2

27+

2336

81+

8

3π log2(2)−1120 log(2)

27

Moreover we have nonhomegeneous hypergeometric results. Indeed, by Li3(x) expansion above

and that

14√x(1− x)

= B

(3

4,

3

4

) ∞∑n=0

(2nn

)P2n(2x− 1)

4n

The quartic-radical polylog integral∫ 1

0Li3(x)

4√x(1−x)

dx is evaluable. Indeed, modulo trivial rational

sums, the identity −∑∞k=2n+3

4(−1)k

k2 = H(2)n+1−H

(2)

n+ 12

and constant factors, the problem boils down

to evaluation of

∞∑n=1

A2n

(2nn

)2n(4n+ 1)

then

∞∑n=1

(1

2n −1

2n+1

) (2nn

) (H

(2)n+1 −H

(2)

n+ 12

)4n

Substituting H(2)n+1−H

(2)

n+ 12

=∫ 1

0

(x−√x)xn log(x)

1−x dx and sum w.r.t n in latter sum yields an elemen-

tary intrgral, which reduces to QLI/NQLIs (W ≤ 3) after x → sin2(t), t → 2 tan−1(u) and partial

fractions. By subsection 8-1-2 again we obtain

(4)

∫ 1

0

Li3(x)4√x(1− x)

dx =Γ(

34

)2√π

5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1,

7

4; 2, 2, 2,

5

2; 1

)

78

=2Γ(

34

)2√π

(2πC − 4C log(2) + 8=(Li3(1 + i))− 21ζ(3)

8− 5π2

12− 3π3

16− 2π

+8 +log3(2)

6− 3

4π log2(2) + log2(2)− 5

24π2 log(2)− π log(2) + 4 log(2)

)In which the 5F4 form comes from Taylor expansion of Li3(x) and Beta integrals. Now consider∫ 1

0

Li3(√x)

4√x(1−x)

dx: Expand Li3 (√x) as above, taking care of parity yields a Gamma combination

of known 5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1, 7

4 ; 2, 2, 2, 52 ; 1)

and 5F4

(12 ,

12 ,

12 ,

54 , 1; 2, 3

2 ,32 ,

32 ; 1). According to parameter

pairs (1; 2),(

12 ; 3

2

)in latter 5F4, via partial fractions it’s furtherly decomposed into

3F2

(1

2,

5

4, 1; 2,

3

2; 1

), 3F2

(1

2,

1

2,

5

4;

3

2,

3

2; 1

), 4F3

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

5

4;

3

2,

3

2,

3

2; 1

)

Using limiting argument for the first and Beta derivative for latter two, all three sums hence

5F4

(12 ,

12 ,

12 ,

54 , 1; 2, 3

2 ,32 ,

32 ; 1)

is evaluated. Thus plugging back the 5F4 in (4) gives

(5)

∫ 1

0

Li3 (√x)

4√x(1− x)

dx = π√

2 +Γ(

34

)232√π

(48πC − 32C log(2) + 64=(Li3(1 + i))− 21ζ(3)− π3

2

−34π2

3− 48π + 64 +

4 log3(2)

3− 10π log2(2) + 8 log2(2)− 17

3π2 log(2)− 24π log(2) + 32 log(2)

)Here, by limiting argument we mean to apply following asymptotics:

3F2

(1

2,

5

4, 1; 2,

3

2; 1

)= limz→1−

z 3F2

(1

2, 1,

5

4; 2,

3

2; z

)= limz→1−

(2z 2F1

(1

2,

5

4;

3

2; z

)− 4

4√

1− z+ 4

)

2F1

(1

2,

5

4;

3

2; z

)=

24√

1− z− π3/2

√2Γ(

14

)Γ(

54

) +O((1− z) 34 ) (z → 1−)

And by Beta derivative we mean to choose appropriate r, p, a in:

r+2Fr+1

({n+ 1

2}r+1,

1− p2

; {n+ 3

2}r+1; a

)=

(−1)r(n+ 1)r+1

r!

∫ 1

0

tn(1− at2

) p−12 logr(t) dt

Similarly, with the help of

1

(x(1− x))3/4= B

(1

4,

1

4

) ∞∑n=0

(2nn

)(4n+ 1)P2n(2x− 1)

4n

One may deduce a pair of dual result:

(4′)

∫ 1

0

Li3(x)

(x(1− x))3/4dx =

Γ(14

)22√π

5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1,

5

4;

3

2, 2, 2, 2; 1

)

79

=Γ(14

)2√π

(2πC + 4C log(2)− 8=(Li3(1 + i))− 21ζ(3)

8+

3π3

16+

log3(2)

6+

3

4π log2(2)− 5

24π2 log(2)

)

(5′)

∫ 1

0

Li3 (√x)

(x(1− x))3/4dx

=Γ(14

)2√π

(3πC

4+

1

2C log(2)−=(Li3(1 + i))− 21ζ(3)

64+

π3

128+

log3(2)

48+

5

32π log2(2)− 17

192π2 log(2)

)

Using exactly the same method in (4)(5). Note that while expanding Li3 (√x) in (5′) we have a

Gamma conbination of known 5F4

(1, 1, 1, 1, 5

4 ; 32 , 2, 2, 2; 1

)and 4F3

(12 ,

12 ,

12 ,

34 ; 3

2 ,32 ,

32 ; 1), in which

the latter, again, is trivially evaluated by Beta derivative.

Finally we have another application of (4). Let x→ 1− x in Prop. 7(8), multiple both sides by1

4√x(1−x)

, integrate on (0,1). Since∫ 1

0logk(x) logm(1−x)

4√x(1−x)

dx,∫ 1

0Li3(x)

4√x(1−x)

dx,∫ 1

0Li3(1−x)4√x(1−x)

dx are trivial

due to Beta derivatives, formula (4) and reflection, we extract the value of∫ 1

0

Li3(1− 1x )

4√x(1−x)

dx. Now a

substitution x→ cos2(t) yields

(6)

∫ π2

0

√sin(2t)Li3

(− tan2(t)

)dt =

√2

πΓ

(3

4

)2 (−4πC + 8C log(2)− 16=(Li3(1 + i))−

31ζ(3)

4+ π3 + π log2(2)

)

Note the corresponding derivation of (4’) is:

(6′)

∫ π2

0

Li3(− tan2(t)

)√sin(2t)

dt =Γ(14

)2√

2π

(−2πC − 4C log(2) + 8=(Li3(1 + i))− 31ζ(3)

8− π3

2− 1

2π log2(2)

)

Other nonhomegeneous radical polylog integrals (i.e. hypergeometric series), including the dou-

ble parametric class∫ 1

0xm−

12 (1 − x)n−

12 Li3(x) dx where m,n ∈ N, are also solvable using FL

expansion and results of NPLI/NQLIs. Since they are relevantly trivial, we simply pause here.

8.5 Two conjectures solved

We prove two related conjectures in [1, 3].

8.5.1 Borwein’s conjecture on binomial sum (pFq part 4)

In [3] Borwein conjectured that∑∞n=1

1

n42n(3nn )

is expressible via single and multiple polylogarithms

Li4,Li3,1. Based on Li4(z) + Li3,1(z) =∑∞n=1

Hnzn

n3 , Prop. 4(3) and subsection 5-3, his statement

80

is equivalent to:

(∗)∞∑n=1

1

n42n(

3nn

) = −2π=(Li3(1+i))−21Li4

(12

)2

− 57

8ζ(3) log(2)+

83π4

480− 23

48log4(2)+

7

12π2 log2(2)

Now we prove this identity. We have

∞∑n=1

1

n42n(3nn

) =

∞∑n=1

∫ 10

2(x2(1−x))n

xdx

n32n=

∫ 1

0

2Li3(x2(1−x)

2

)x

dx =

∫ 1

0Li2

(x2(1− x)

2

)(2 log(x)

1− x−

4 log(x)

x

)dx

Where we’ve used Beta integral, Fubini, definition of polylog and integration by parts, lifting up

log(x). Now the original problem is reduced to the evaluation of 2 integrals:

J14=

∫ 1

0

Li2(

12x

2(1− x))

log(x)

xdx, J2

4=

∫ 1

0

Li2(

12x

2(1− x))

log(x)

1− xdx

Indeed, we will establish that:

J1 = −C2 +1

4πC log(2)− 1

2π=(Li3(1 + i))−

15Li4(12

)8

− 83

64ζ(3) log(2) +

31π4

768− 13

192log4(2) +

1

12π2 log2(2)

J2 = −2C2 +1

2πC log(2)−2π=(Li3(1+ i))−9Li4

(1

2

)− 197

32ζ(3) log(2)+

107π4

640− 3

8log4(2)+

11

24π2 log2(2)

For J1, lift up 12 log2(x), simplify then factorize the log:

J1 =

∫ 1

0

1

2

(2

x− 1

1− x

)log2(x)

(log

((1− x)2 + 1

2

)+ log(x+ 1)

)dx

Via possible reflection x→ 1− x, this expression is decomposed into several LIs and QLIs, that is:

LI(0, 2, 1; 1)−1

2LI(0, 2, 1; 0)+

log(2)

2LI(2, 0, 0; 1)−1

2QLI(114; 2)+

∫ 1

0

log2(1− x) log(

12

(x2 + 1

))1− x

dx

Lifting up − 13 log3(1− x), the last one equals to 2

3QLI(111; 5) so J1 is solved. For J2, firstly we lift

up Li2(1− x)(=∫ log(x)

1−x dx) to arrive at:

J2 =

∫ 1

0

(2

x− 1

1− x

)Li2(1− x)

(log

((1− x)2 + 1

2

)+ log(x+ 1)

)dx

Replacing Li2(1− x) by π2

6 − Li2(x)− log(1− x) log(x), two parts of J2 i.e.∫ 1

0Li2(1−x) log(x+1)

x dx,∫ 1

0Li2(1−x) log(x+1)

1−x dx are evaluated by using integration by parts and LI, PLI results. For the other

two parts involving log(

(1−x)2+12

), use x → 1 − x again. Modulo known LI/PLI/QLIs, the only

81

two remains are: ∫ 1

0

Li2(x) log(x2 + 1

)x

dx,

∫ 1

0

Li2(x) log(

12

(x2 + 1

))1− x

dx

The former is simply QPLI4(1; 4; 2) and the latter boils down to QPLI4(1; 1; 5) after lifting up

− log(1− x) (modulo QLI values), thus J2 is solved and Borwein’s conjecture is confirmed true.

Note that the equivalent hypergeometric form is:

6F5

(1, 1, 1, 1, 1,

3

2;

4

3,

5

3, 2, 2, 2;

2

27

)= −12π=(Li3(1 + i))− 63Li4

(1

2

)− 171

4ζ(3) log(2) +

83π4

80− 23

8log4(2) +

7

2π2 log2(2)

8.5.2 Au’s conjecture on general LI

In [1] Au conjectured that In =∫ 1

0logn(1−x) logn−1(1+x)

1+x dx lies in the algebra generated by log(2), π2,

ζ(3), ζ(5), ζ(7), · · · over Q and verified the case n ≤ 10. Now we prove the general statement by

generalizing method of Prop. 2(7). Denote

f(k, j) =

∫ 12

0

logj(1− y) logk(y)

1− ydy

Consider the integral jf(j, k−1). By partial integration, separation, Beta derivatives and reflection

y → 1− y, we have

jf(k, j − 1) = −(− log(2))j+k + k

∫ 12

0

logj(1− y) logk−1(y)

ydy

= −(− log(2))j+k + k

(∫ 1

0

−∫ 1

12

)logj(1− y) logk−1(y)

ydy = U(j, k)− kf(j, k − 1)

Where

U(k, j) = jf(k, j − 1) + kf(j, k − 1) = −(− log(2))j+k + k lima→0

limb→1

∂k+j−1B(a, b)

∂ak−1 ∂bj

Noticing(n−1j−1)(

nk)

(nj)(n−1k−1)

= jk , we have a crucial identity

82

(n

k

)(n− 1

m− k

)f(k,m−k)+

(n

m+ 1− k

)(n− 1

k − 1

)f(m+1−k, k−1) =

(nk

)(n−1m−k

)−k +m+ 1

U(k,m+1−k)

Now, using substitution y → 1−x2 and Binomial theorem twice on In:

In =

∫ 12

0

logn(2y) logn−1(2(1− y))

1− ydy =

n∑k=0

n−1∑j=0

(n

k

)(n− 1

j

)f(k, j) log2n−j−k−1(2)

Extract k = 0

In =

n∑k=1

n−1∑j=0

(n

k

)(n− 1

j

)f(k, j) log2n−j−k−1(2) +

∫ 12

0

logn(2) logn−1(2(1− y))

1− ydy

Take Cauchy product and simplify:

In =

2n−1∑m=1

∑k+j=m

(n

k

)(n− 1

j

)f(k, j) log2n−m−1(2) +

log2n(2)

n

=

(n∑

m=1

m∑k=1

+

2n−1∑m=n+1

n∑k=m−n+1

)(n

k

)(n− 1

m− k

)f(k,m− k) log2n−m−1(2) +

log2n(2)

n

Let k → m+ 1− k then take averages:

In =log2n(2)

n+

1

2

(n∑

m=1

m∑k=1

+

2n−1∑m=n+1

n∑k=m−n+1

)((

n

k

)(n− 1

m− k

)f(k,m− k) +

(n

m+ 1− k

)(n− 1

k − 1

)f(m+ 1− k, k − 1)

)log2n−m−1(2)

Plug in the crucial identity

(∗)In =log2n(2)

n+

1

2

(n∑

m=1

m∑k=1

+

2n−1∑m=n+1

n∑k=m−n+1

) (nk

)(n−1m−k

)log−m+2n−1(2)

−k +m+ 1U(k,m+ 1− k)

According to [1], Lemma 2.3, all Beta derivatives in U(k,m + 1 − k) above lies in the algebra

generated by π2, ζ(3), ζ(5), ζ(7), · · · over Q. Adding up log(2) factors in U concludes the proof.

83

9 Table of subjects

9.1 LI

Table of 85 LIs with weight ≤ 5. For instance:

Weight 3 LI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3)

(1,0,1;2) − 112

13

18

Implies that LI(1, 0, 1; 2) =∫ 1

0log(1−x) log(x+1)

x+1 dx = ζ(3)8 + log3(2)

3 − 112π

2 log(2).

Weight 1 LI: LI(0, 0, 0; 1) = log(2)

Weight 2 LI π2 log2(2)

(0,1,0;0) − 16 0

(1,0,0;1) − 16 0

(0,0,1;1) 112 0

(1,0,0;2) − 112

12

(0,1,0;2) − 112 0

(0,0,1;2) 0 12

Weight 3 LI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3)

(0,2,0;0) 0 0 2

(1,1,0;0) 0 0 1

(0,1,1;0) − 14 0 1

(2,0,0;1) 0 0 2

(0,0,2;1) 0 0 14

(1,1,0;1) 0 0 1

(0,1,1;1) 0 0 − 34

(1,0,1;1) 0 0 − 58

(2,0,0;2) − 16

13

74

(0,2,0;2) 0 0 32

(0,0,2;2) 0 13 0

(1,1,0;2) − 14 0 13

8

(0,1,1;2) 0 0 − 18

(1,0,1;2) − 112

13

18

84

Weight 4 LI π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 )

(0,3,0;0) − 115 0 0 0 0

(2,1,0;0) − 145 0 0 0 0

(1,2,0;0) − 1180 0 0 0 0

(0,2,1;0) − 19720 0 0 7

2 0

(0,1,2;0) − 7144 − 5

1216

214 4

(1,1,1;0) 171440 − 1

24 − 112

78 −2

(3,0,0;1) − 115 0 0 0 0

(0,0,3;1) 115

14 − 1

4 − 214 −6

(2,1,0;1) − 1180 0 0 0 0

(2,0,1;1) − 1144 − 1

12112

74 2

(1,2,0;1) − 145 0 0 0 0

(0,2,1;1) 7360 0 0 0 0

(1,0,2;1) − 1240 0 0 0 0

(0,1,2;1) 124

16 − 1

6 − 72 −4

(1,1,1;1) − 3160 − 1

12112

74 2

(3,0,0;2) 0 0 0 0 −6

(0,3,0;2) − 7120 0 0 0 0

(0,0,3;2) 0 0 14 0 0

(2,1,0;2) 11360 0 − 1

4 0 −6

(2,0,1;2) − 1360 − 1

614 2 0

(1,2,0;2) 190

16 − 1

6 0 −4

(0,2,1;2) − 124 − 1

616

72 4

(1,0,2;2) − 145 − 1

613 2 2

(0,1,2;2) − 145 − 1

12112

74 2

(1,1,1;2) − 145 − 5

24112

218 2

85

Weight 5 LI π4 log(2) π2 log3(2) log5(2) π2ζ(3) ζ(3) log2(2) ζ(5) Li4( 12) log(2) Li5( 1

2)

(0,4,0;0) 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0

(3,1,0;0) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0

(1,3,0;0) 0 0 0 −1 0 12 0 0

(0,3,1;0) − 18

0 0 − 38

0 12 0 0

(0,1,3;0) − 1780

− 13

− 120

− 716

638

1174

−6 −24

(2,2,0;0) 0 0 0 − 23

0 8 0 0

(0,2,2;0) − 49360

19

− 15

− 1324

72

472

−8 −16

(2,1,1;0) 1120

− 118

160

− 716

78

− 74

2 8

(1,2,1;0) 1180

− 118

110

− 2948

74

14

4 8

(1,1,2;0) − 148

− 16

0 − 12

72

6 0 0

(4,0,0;1) 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0

(0,0,4;1) 0 23

− 45

0 − 212

24 −24 −24

(3,1,0;1) 0 0 0 −1 0 12 0 0

(3,0,1;1) 0 − 16

15

− 716

218

− 8116

6 6

(1,3,0;1) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0

(0,3,1;1) 0 0 0 0 0 − 458

0 0

(1,0,3;1) 0 16

− 15

716

− 218

34

−6 −6

(0,1,3;1) 0 13

− 25

12

− 214

9916

−12 −12

(2,2,0;1) 0 0 0 − 23

0 8 0 0

(2,0,2;1) 0 − 19

215

0 74

− 258

4 4

(0,2,2;1) 0 0 0 13

0 − 298

0 0

(2,1,1;1) 0 − 19

215

− 116

74

− 72

4 4

(1,2,1;1) 0 0 0 18

0 − 2716

0 0

(1,1,2;1) 0 0 0 748

0 − 2516

0 0

(4,0,0;2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24

(0,4,0;2) 0 0 0 0 0 452

0 0

(0,0,4;2) 0 0 15

0 0 0 0 0

(3,1,0;2) 140

0 − 320

− 78

0 − 316

0 18

(3,0,1;2) − 1120

− 16

320

− 12

3 316

0 6

(1,3,0;2) − 18

0 0 − 34

0 27316

0 0

(0,3,1;2) 0 0 0 − 12

0 8716

0 0

(1,0,3;2) − 115

− 16

14

0 3 6 0 −6

(0,1,3;2) 0 − 16

15

0 218

−6 6 6

(2,2,0;2) 190

19

− 115

− 1312

0 152

0 8

(2,0,2;2) − 120

− 29

730

− 13

4 638

0 −4

(0,2,2;2) 0 − 29

415

− 13

72

− 338

8 8

(2,1,1;2) − 148

− 19

− 115

− 12

218

12116

−2 −2

(1,2,1;2) − 49720

118

− 110

− 512

74

21316

−4 −8

(1,1,2;2) − 17240

− 16

120

− 724

72

192

0 −6

86

9.2 ES

Table of 89 ESs with weight ≤ 5.

Weight 2 ESs: ES(1;−1) =π2

12− log2(2)

2, ES(−1;−1) =

π2

12+

log2(2)

2

Weight 3 ES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3)

(1; 2) 0 0 2

(−1; 2) 14 0 − 1

4

(1;−2) 0 0 58

(−1;−2) 14 0 − 5

8

(2;−1) − 112 0 1

(−2;−1) − 16 0 13

8

(1, 1;−1) − 112

13

34

(1,−1;−1) 16 − 1

314

(−1,−1;−1) 14

13 − 1

2

87

Weight 4 ES π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 )

(1; 3) 172 0 0 0 0

(−1; 3) − 1288 0 0 7

4 0

(1;−3) 11360

112 − 1

12 − 74 −2

(−1;−3) 160

112 − 1

12 0 −2

(2; 2) 7360 0 0 0 0

(−2; 2) 17288

16 − 1

6 − 72 −4

(2;−2) − 17480 − 1

616

72 4

(−2;−2) 131440 0 0 0 0

(1, 1; 2) 17360 0 0 0 0

(1,−1; 2) 431440

18 − 1

8 0 −3

(−1,−1; 2) − 13720

512

112 0 2

(1, 1;−2) 411440

112 − 1

12 − 74 −2

(1,−1;−2) 291440

18 − 1

8 0 −3

(−1,−1;−2) − 611440

13

16

74 4

(3;−1) 191440 0 0 − 3

4 0

(−3;−1) − 1180 − 1

12112

34 2

(1, 2;−1) − 190 − 1

24112

78 2

(−1, 2;−1) 431440 − 1

24 − 18 0 −3

(1,−2;−1) − 1160 − 1

2418 0 3

(−1,−2;−1) 611440 − 1

24 − 16 − 7

8 −4

(1, 1, 1;−1) 1144

18 − 1

4 − 98 0

(1, 1,−1;−1) 531440

124

18 0 −3

(1,−1,−1;−1) 0 724 − 1

438 0

(−1,−1,−1;−1) − 591440

1324

1124 0 5

88

Weight 5 ES π4 log(2) π2 log3(2) log5(2) π2ζ(3) ζ(3) log2(2) ζ(5) Li4( 12 ) log(2) Li5( 1

2 )

(1; 4) 0 0 0 − 16 0 3 0 0

(−1; 4) 148 0 0 1

16 0 − 1716 0 0

(1;−4) 0 0 0 − 112 0 59

32 0 0

(−1;−4) 148 0 0 1

8 0 − 5932 0 0

(2; 3) 0 0 0 12 0 − 9

2 0 0

(−2; 3) 0 0 0 − 124 0 51

32 0 0

(2;−3) 0 0 0 548 0 − 11

32 0 0

(−2;−3) 0 0 0 − 38 0 83

16 0 0

(1, 1; 3) 0 0 0 − 16 0 7

2 0 0

(1,−1; 3) 245

136 − 1

60116 − 7

8 − 19364 0 2

(−1,−1; 3) 19720

118 − 1

3018

74 − 167

32 0 4

(1, 1;−3) 0 − 19

215 − 11

4874 − 19

32 4 4

(1,−1;−3) 245

136 − 1

60 − 148 − 7

8 − 3716 0 2

(−1,−1;−3) 19720

16 − 1

6116 0 − 19

32 −4 0

(3; 2) 0 0 0 − 13 0 11

2 0 0

(−3; 2) 0 0 0 148 0 41

32 0 0

(3;−2) 0 0 0 18 0 − 21

32 0 0

(−3;−2) 0 0 0 716 0 − 67

16 0 0

(1, 2; 2) 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 0

(−1, 2; 2) − 231440

118 − 1

10112 0 27

4 −4 −8

(1,−2; 2) 0 − 19

215 − 5

2474

2964 4 4

(−1,−2; 2) 49720

118 − 1

30 − 18 − 7

4 − 238 0 4

(1, 2;−2) 0 19 − 2

15532 − 7

4238 −4 −4

(−1, 2;−2) − 231440 − 1

18130

516

74 − 29

64 0 −4

(1,−2;−2) 0 0 0 − 1348 0 125

32 0 0

(−1,−2;−2) 49720 − 1

18110

196 0 − 35

4 4 8

(1, 1, 1; 2) 0 0 0 16 0 10 0 0

(1, 1,−1; 2) 1091440 − 1

36120

112 0 − 165

32 2 4

(1,−1,−1; 2) 110

16 − 1

1016 0 − 53

4 0 12

(−1,−1,−1; 2) − 29160

1112 − 1

20112 0 367

16 −6 −24

(1, 1, 1;−2) 0 − 16

15 − 9

32218 − 9

4 6 6

(1, 1,−1;−2) 1091440

136 − 1

60 − 18 − 7

8 − 19764 0 2

(1,−1,−1;−2) 110

29 − 1

6196 − 7

8 −10 −2 10

(−1,−1,−1;−2) − 29160

34

320 − 1

8218

122964 0 −18

(4;−1) − 7720 0 0 − 1

16 0 2 0 0

(−4;−1) − 190 0 0 − 1

8 0 9132 0 0

(1, 3;−1) − 491440

136 − 1

20 − 196

38

16732 −2 −4

(−1, 3;−1) 111440 − 1

36160 − 5

48 − 38 − 193

64 0 −2

(1,−3;−1) 1360

136 − 1

6016 − 3

8 − 3716 0 2

(−1,−3;−1) 111440 − 1

12112

124

38 − 19

32 2 0

(2, 2;−1) 29360 − 1

915

548 0 − 259

16 8 16

(2,−2;−1) − 5288 0 0 1

16 0 7564 0 0

(−2,−2;−1) − 13120

19 − 1

5 − 124 0 299

16 −8 −16

(1, 1, 2;−1) 7720

118 − 1

12116 − 7

8 0 −2 0

(1,−1, 2;−1) − 145 − 1

72120

796

716

15532 0 −6

(−1,−1, 2;−1) 120 − 1

36 − 14

148 0 0 −6 0

(1, 1,−2;−1) − 131440

136 − 1

20 − 148 0 − 93

64 0 6

(1,−1,−2;−1) − 1480 − 5

7216 0 7

16 0 4 0

(−1,−1,−2;−1) 1931440 − 1

9 − 760

124 − 7

8 − 89964 0 14

(1, 1, 1, 1;−1) 11360 − 2

9310 − 11

4894 − 83

16 4 8

(1, 1, 1,−1;−1) 37720

772 − 11

60 − 196 − 9

165516 0 −2

(1, 1,−1,−1;−1) 97720

112

110

116 − 3

8 − 20116 0 12

(1,−1,−1,−1;−1) − 1180

4172 − 13

601396

916 − 83

32 0 2

(−1,−1,−1,−1;−1) − 71180

32

1330

548 0 733

16 −4 −48

89

9.3 PLI

Table of 263 PLIs with weight ≤ 5. For sake of simplicity, we abbreviate PLI(a, b, c; · · · ) as

PLI(abc; · · · ).

Weight 3 PLI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3)

(000; 21; 1) 0 0 1

(000; 21; 2) 16 0 − 5

8

(000; 22; 1) 0 0 − 34

(000; 22; 2) − 112 0 1

4

(000; 23; 0) − 112

16

78

(000; 23; 2) 112 − 1

6 − 14

(000; 24; 2) 112 − 1

618

(000; 25; 0) − 16 0 13

8

(000; 25; 2) 16 0 − 5

8

(000; 26; 0) 112 0 −1

(000; 26; 2) − 112 0 1

4

90

Weight 4 PLI π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 )

(010; 21; 0) − 1120 0 0 0 0

(010; 21; 1) − 190 0 0 0 0

(010; 21; 2) − 1480 0 0 0 0

(001; 21; 1) − 160 − 1

12112

74 2

(001; 21; 2) − 1480

112 0 0 0

(100; 21; 1) − 172 0 0 0 0

(100; 21; 2) − 291440 − 1

2418 0 3

(010; 22; 0) 711440

16 − 1

6 − 72 −4

(010; 22; 1) 7720 0 0 0 0

(010; 22; 2) 13288

16 − 1

6 − 72 −4

(001; 22; 1) − 1288 0 0 0 0

(001; 22; 2) 130

112 − 1

8 − 218 −3

(100; 22; 1) 11360

112 − 1

12 − 74 −2

(100; 22; 2) 124

18 − 1

6 − 218 −4

(010; 23; 0) − 1720 0 − 1

2418 −1

(010; 23; 2) 1360

124 0 −1 0

(001; 23; 0) − 1288 − 1

24124

78 0

(001; 23; 1) 11240

18 − 1

6 − 134 −4

(001; 23; 2) 130

16 − 1

6 − 238 −3

91

Weight 4 PLI π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 )

(100; 23; 0) 0 0 0 0 −1

(100; 23; 1) − 191440

124

124

14 1

(100; 23; 2) − 11440

124 − 1

24 − 14 0

(010; 24; 0) − 11288 − 1

2418 1 3

(010; 24; 2) 1180 0 − 1

12 − 18 −2

(001; 24; 1) − 136 − 5

2416

238 4

(001; 24; 2) − 190 0 0 1 1

(100; 24; 1) − 111440

524 − 1

8 − 58 −3

(100; 24; 2) − 196

124 − 1

2418 0

(010; 25; 0) 148

524 − 5

24 − 74 −5

(010; 25; 2) − 13720 − 1

818 0 3

(001; 25; 0) 7480 0 − 1

12 − 18 −2

(001; 25; 1) 11720

124 − 1

24 − 78 −1

(001; 25; 2) 1480

112 0 − 5

8 0

(100; 25; 0) 1180 0 − 1

12 − 18 −2

(100; 25; 1) 71440

124 − 1

24 − 78 −1

(100; 25; 2) 0 112 0 − 5

8 0

(010; 26; 0) 371440

124 − 1

24 − 74 −1

(010; 26; 2) 1120

124 − 1

24 0 −1

(001; 26; 0) 531440

16 − 1

8 − 298 −3

(001; 26; 1) − 19240 − 7

24724

498 7

(001; 26; 2) − 130 − 1

618

238 3

(100; 26; 0) 1720 0 1

24 − 18 1

(100; 26; 1) 11720

124 − 1

24 − 78 −1

(100; 26; 2) 171440 0 − 1

24 − 58 −1

(000; 31; 1) 190 0 0 0 0

(000; 31; 2) 160

112 − 1

12 − 34 −2

(000; 32; 1) − 7720 0 0 0 0

(000; 32; 2) 1288 0 0 − 3

4 0

(000; 33; 0) 0 0 0 0 1

(000; 33; 2) − 1288 − 1

24124

78 0

(000; 34; 2) 190 0 0 0 −1

(000; 35; 0) − 1180 − 1

12112

34 2

(000; 35; 2) 160

112 − 1

12 − 34 −2

(000; 36; 0) − 191440 0 0 3

4 0

(000; 36; 2) 1288 0 0 − 3

4 0

92

Weight 5 PLI π4 log(2) π2 log3(2) log5(2) π2ζ(3) ζ(3) log2(2) ζ(5) Li4( 12) log(2) Li5( 1

2)

(020; 21; 0) 0 0 0 1 0 −11 0 0

(020; 21; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

(020; 21; 2) 0 0 0 34

0 − 678

0 0

(002; 21; 1) 0 − 29

415

− 14

72

− 398

8 8

(002; 21; 2) 0 19

− 115

748

− 78

14

−2 −2

(200; 21; 1) 0 0 0 13

0 −1 0 0

(200; 21; 2) 19720

− 136

120

724

0 − 2332

0 −6

(110; 21; 0) 0 0 0 23

0 − 132

0 0

(110; 21; 1) 0 0 0 16

0 − 32

0 0

(100; 21; 2) − 196

0 0 3148

0 − 42164

0 0

(011; 21; 0) − 196

19

− 215

2948

− 74

− 218

−4 −4

(011; 21; 1) 0 0 0 − 516

0 10732

0 0

(011; 21; 2) 0 19

− 215

1996

− 74

5332

−4 −4

(101; 21; 1) 0 0 0 − 548

0 2964

0 0

(101; 21; 2) − 11720

572

− 140

2396

− 2116

− 1564

−1 −2

(020; 22; 0) 0 0 0 112

0 − 2116

0 0

(020; 22; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 − 158

0 0

(020; 22; 2) 0 0 0 524

0 − 4116

0 0

(002; 22; 1) 0 − 19

215

− 148

74

− 12532

4 4

(002; 22; 2) 0 736

− 415

0 − 72

8 −8 −8

(200; 22; 1) 0 19

− 215

18

− 74

1516

−4 −4

(200; 22; 2) 13144

118

− 160

724

− 218

− 614

2 12

(110; 22; 0) 0 19

− 215

332

− 74

7132

−4 −4

(110; 22; 1) 0 0 0 548

0 − 32

0 0

(110; 22; 2) 17180

0 115

1996

− 74

− 23716

4 12

(011; 22; 0) 17180

19

− 115

548

− 72

− 30132

0 8

(011; 22; 1) 0 0 0 116

0 − 1732

0 0

(011; 22; 2) 0 29

− 415

2596

− 72

32364

−8 −8

(101; 22; 1) 0 19

− 215

596

− 74

12332

−4 −4

(101; 22; 2) 19240

1172

− 19120

524

− 6316

− 20932

−3 4

(020; 23; 0) − 19720

19

− 215

748

−1 15132

−4 −4

(020; 23; 2) 19720

0 0 724

− 34

− 154

0 0

(002; 23; 0) − 1144

− 136

160

148

78

− 332

0 0

(002; 23; 1) 115

112

− 120

148

− 114

− 9916

0 6

(002; 23; 2) 115

118

0 0 −2 −8 2 8

(200; 23; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

93


2)

(200; 23; 1) − 1144

536

− 1160

1124

− 114

8132

−6 −8

(200; 23; 2) − 1720

736

− 1360

2348

− 238

2332

−6 −6

(110; 23; 0) 171440

124

− 112

196

− 1516

2564

−2 0

(110; 23; 1) − 3160

112

− 760

38

− 118

14364

−4 −6

(110; 23; 2) − 196

536

− 18

512

− 178

3764

−4 −5

(011; 23; 0) − 17360

772

− 17120

112

− 12

24532

−5 −8

(011; 23; 1) 124

− 118

110

18

38

− 798

4 8

(011; 23; 2) 7144

− 112

215

524

116

− 36932

5 9

(101; 23; 0) − 1288

124

− 7120

796

− 716

2764

−2 −1

(101; 23; 1) − 1240

112

− 110

16

−1 6964

−3 −3

(101; 23; 2) 471440

572

− 124

2596

− 2516

− 38164

0 3

(020; 24; 0) − 190

− 118

130

1924

34

− 15932

0 −4

(020; 24; 2) 190

− 118

110

38

1 − 15316

4 8

(022; 24; 1) − 1240

0 0 − 512

− 18

8716

0 0

(022; 24; 2) − 145

0 0 0 1 2 0 −2

(200; 24; 1) − 115

− 118

115

516

− 18

8132

2 2

(200; 24; 2) − 148

136

− 160

516

18

− 2932

0 0

(110; 24; 0) − 11360

− 136

− 160

1932

− 116

8764

−2 −8

(110; 24; 1) − 1180

− 118

115

− 748

38

8164

2 2

(110; 24; 2) − 1480

172

140

1748

12

− 52164

2 7

(011; 24; 0) − 196

− 536

940

712

178

− 43732

7 8

(011; 24; 1) − 3160

536

− 1160

− 1948

− 118

18316

−6 −8

(011; 24; 2) − 145

− 124

− 160

116

1516

6532

−1 −3

(101; 24; 1) − 1144

− 118

120

− 1348

138

13164

1 −1

(101; 24; 2) − 311440

− 124

7120

332

2316

− 12364

2 1

(020; 25; 0) − 41720

− 16

730

13

74

− 21732

8 12

(020; 25; 2) 41720

− 118

130

− 124

74

0 0 −4

(002; 25; 0) 7240

− 16

16

− 1948

52

− 418

6 10

(002; 25; 1) 0 518

− 13

58

− 358

9332

−10 −10

(002; 25; 2) 1240

19

− 115

748

− 32

14

−2 −2

(200; 25; 0) 190

118

− 110

− 18

−1 158

−2 2

(200; 25; 1) 0 − 16

15

3748

218

− 46532

6 6

(200; 25; 2) 0 − 19

15

12

2 − 18316

6 6

(110; 25; 0) 231440

118

− 130

− 148

− 716

− 15564

0 4

(110; 25; 1) 0 − 16

15

1732

218

− 71364

6 6

(110; 25; 2) − 191440

− 736

1360

1748

3516

− 314

6 4

94


2)

(011; 25; 0) 1180

− 118

110

− 596

2116

− 9316

4 8

(011; 25; 1) 0 118

− 115

148

− 78

3132

−2 −2

(011; 25; 2) − 1360

− 112

112

− 332

716

3164

2 0

(101; 25; 0) 291440

− 118

130

1196

34

− 10916

2 6

(101; 25; 1) 0 118

− 115

− 1796

− 78

318

−2 −2

(101; 25; 2) 1480

0 115

− 596

14

− 4532

2 2

(020; 26; 0) 49720

− 16

730

18

74

− 52732

8 12

(020; 26; 2) − 49720

− 118

130

− 18

74

9316

0 −4

(002; 26; 0) 53720

− 118

320

− 148

−1 − 38132

6 12

(002; 26; 1) 0 − 16

15

− 148

218

− 9316

6 6

(002; 26; 2) − 115

− 118

− 160

0 2 8 −2 −8

(200; 26; 0) 1360

118

− 120

16

−1 − 116

−2 −4

(200; 26; 1) 0 − 16

15

− 1124

218

− 3132

6 6

(200; 26; 2) 17720

− 16

1160

− 516

2 − 14932

6 8

(110; 26; 0) 196

0 0 2396

− 716

− 21764

0 0

(110; 26; 1) 0 − 16

15

− 4396

218

− 9364

6 6

(110; 26; 2) 17720

− 536

1160

− 1348

3516

− 34164

6 8

(011; 26; 0) 1511440

− 29

13

1396

2116

− 71332

12 20

(011; 26; 1) 0 118

− 115

− 38

− 78

21732

−2 −2

(011; 26; 2) − 17240

112

− 320

− 524

716

46532

−6 −12

(101; 26; 0) 11288

0 120

1796

−1 − 40564

2 4

(101; 26; 1) 0 − 16

15

− 3796

218

− 9364

6 6

(101; 26; 2) − 311440

− 19

112

− 2596

2 18964

2 0

(010; 31; 0) 0 0 0 13

0 − 92

0 0

(010; 31; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0

(010; 31; 2) 0 0 0 716

0 − 8316

0 0

(100; 31; 1) 0 0 0 16

0 −3 0 0

(100; 31; 2) 1360

136

− 160

13

− 38

− 8516

0 2

(001; 31; 1) 0 0 0 − 18

0 5932

0 0

(001; 31; 2) 0 19

− 215

18

− 54

3916

−4 −4

(010; 32; 0) 0 0 0 148

0 1132

0 0

(010; 32; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 1516

0 0

(010; 32; 2) 0 0 0 − 18

0 5132

0 0

(100; 32; 1) 0 0 0 − 112

0 5932

0 0

(100; 32; 2) 491440

− 136

120

− 796

− 38

− 278

2 4

(001; 32; 1) 0 0 0 116

0 − 1716

0 0

95


2)

(001; 32; 2) 0 118

− 115

196

− 54

12564

−2 −2

(010; 33; 0) 1720

136

− 140

112

− 12

− 132

−1 −2

(010; 33; 2) − 1720

118

− 340

116

− 1316

3364

−2 −1

(100; 33; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1

(100; 33; 1) 191440

572

− 13120

332

− 2316

2364

−3 −2

(100; 33; 2) − 1288

572

− 11120

748

− 78

8164

−3 −3

(001; 33; 0) 0 136

− 130

796

− 716

2732

−1 −2

(001; 33; 1) − 11240

124

− 115

148

516

45764

−3 −7

(001; 33; 2) − 1288

− 172

1120

196

716

− 364

0 0

(010; 34; 0) 1180

− 118

120

532

1316

− 40564

2 4

(010; 34; 2) − 1180

− 136

120

116

12

− 1516

1 −1

(100; 34; 1) 111440

− 572

140

− 1996

516

2916

0 −3

(100; 34; 2) 190

− 136

130

332

716

− 12332

1 2

(001; 34; 1) 136

572

− 130

− 18

− 2316

− 3532

0 4

(001; 34; 2) 190

0 0 0 0 −1 0 1

(010; 35; 0) − 1360

112

− 760

112

− 78

9332

−4 −6

(010; 35; 2) 1360

− 112

760

524

78

− 314

4 6

(100; 35; 0) − 1180

136

− 120

− 316

− 12

15332

−2 −4

(100; 35; 1) 0 − 118

115

512

78

− 46564

2 2

(100; 35; 2) 160

− 136

120

516

12

− 618

2 4

(001; 35; 0) − 1180

136

− 120

14

− 12

1932

−2 −4

(001; 35; 1) 0 − 118

115

− 1748

78

15564

2 2

(001; 35; 2) 160

− 136

120

− 18

12

− 3916

2 4

(010; 36; 0) − 491440

112

− 760

− 116

− 78

52764

−4 −6

(010; 36; 2) 491440

− 112

760

− 112

78

− 34164

4 6

(100; 36; 0) − 191440

118

− 115

796

− 12

15164

−2 −2

(100; 36; 1) 0 − 118

115

− 332

78

− 3164

2 2

(100; 36; 2) 1288

− 118

115

− 1396

12

− 2364

2 2

(001; 36; 0) − 191440

118

− 115

− 596

− 12

19364

−2 −2

(001; 36; 1) 0 − 118

115

196

78

− 15564

2 2

(001; 36; 2) 1288

− 118

115

− 196

12

− 12564

2 2

(000; 41; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

(000; 41; 2) 190

0 0 18

0 − 5932

0 0

(000; 42; 1) 0 0 0 0 0 − 1516

0 0

(000; 42; 2) − 7720

0 0 − 116

0 1716

0 0

(000; 43; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

96


2)

(000; 43; 2) 0 136

− 130

796

− 716

2732

−1 −2

(000; 44; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 −1

(000; 45; 0) − 190

0 0 − 18

0 9132

0 0

(000; 45; 2) 190

0 0 18

0 − 5932

0 0

(000; 46; 0) 7720

0 0 116

0 −2 0 0

(000; 46; 2) − 7720

0 0 − 116

0 1716

0 0

(000; 21, 21; 1) 0 0 0 13

0 −3 0 0

(000; 21, 21; 2) 136

0 0 − 524

0 2932

0 0

(000; 22, 22; 1) 0 0 0 18

0 − 1716

0 0

(000; 22, 22; 2) 1144

− 29

415

− 124

72

− 12516

8 8

(000; 23, 23; 0) − 1144

112

− 760

748

− 78

2732

−2 −2

(000; 23, 23; 2) 1144

− 136

120

− 124

0 316

0 0

(000; 24, 24; 2) 1144

− 112

760

316

78

− 12332

2 2

(000; 25, 25; 2) 136

0 0 − 524

0 2932

0 0

(000; 25, 25; 0) − 136

0 0 1324

0 − 12532

0 0

(000; 26, 26; 2) 1144

− 29

415

− 124

72

− 12516

8 8

(000; 26, 26; 0) − 1144

29

− 415

16

− 72

274

−8 −8

(000; 21, 22; 1) 0 0 0 − 524

0 5932

0 0

(000; 21, 22; 2) − 172

− 19

215

− 1996

74

− 3332

4 4

(000; 21, 23; 0) − 191440

− 572

13120

− 332

2316

− 2364

3 2

(000; 21, 23; 1) − 160

− 136

160

− 1148

38

31164

0 −2

(000; 21, 23; 2) 191440

− 18

18

− 516

138

− 10164

4 5

(000; 21, 24; 1) − 172

− 118

115

12

38

− 8516

2 2

(000; 21, 24; 2) 111440

− 572

140

− 132

516

2916

0 −3

(000; 21, 25; 1) 0 118

− 115

− 512

− 78

46564

−2 −2

(000; 21, 25; 2) − 71440

572

− 11120

− 1748

− 78

314

−3 −4

(000; 21, 25; 0) 71440

− 172

140

− 116

0 − 3164

1 2

(000; 21, 26; 1) 0 118

− 115

1748

− 78

− 15564

−2 −2

(000; 21, 26; 2) − 11720

572

− 11120

2396

− 78

9364

−3 −4

(000; 21, 26; 0) 11720

− 172

140

− 748

0 − 3132

1 2

(000; 22, 23; 0) 11240

− 124

115

− 148

− 516

− 45764

3 7

(000; 22, 23; 1) − 1288

0 0 148

38

− 1532

0 0

(000; 22, 23; 2) − 11240

572

− 110

124

− 18

618

−4 −8

(000; 22, 24; 1) 11360

− 136

120

− 1996

38

− 278

2 4

(000; 22, 24; 2) 136

572

− 130

− 524

− 2316

− 3532

0 4

(000; 22, 25; 0) 11720

− 172

140

1196

0 − 318

1 2

97


2)

(000; 22, 25; 1) 0 118

− 115

332

− 78

3164

−2 −2

(000; 22, 25; 2) − 11720

572

− 11120

2396

− 78

9364

−3 −4

(000; 22, 26; 0) − 19240

772

− 740

132

0 89964

−7 −14

(000; 22, 26; 1) 0 118

− 115

− 196

− 78

15564

−2 −2

(000; 22, 26; 2) 19240

− 124

13120

− 124

− 78

− 938

5 12

(000; 23, 24; 0) − 1144

− 118

120

− 796

2116

− 8164

3 3

(000; 23, 24; 2) 1144

118

− 120

− 2596

− 2116

36964

−3 −3

(000; 23, 25; 0) − 172

118

− 130

524

− 716

− 516

−1 −1

(000; 23, 25; 2) 172

118

− 110

18

− 2116

2932

−3 −3

(000; 23, 26; 0) 1144

− 572

115

− 532

78

− 5164

2 2

(000; 23, 26; 2) − 1144

18

− 215

124

− 74

6116

−4 −4

(000; 24, 25; 0) − 172

16

− 16

− 596

− 3516

578

−5 −5

(000; 24, 25; 2) 172

− 118

130

− 1796

716

12

1 1

(000; 24, 26; 0) 1144

1172

− 15

− 316

− 218

578

−6 −6

(000; 24, 26; 2) − 1144

− 772

215

2596

74

− 43364

4 4

(000; 25, 26; 0) 172

19

− 215

− 196

− 74

238

−4 −4

(000; 25, 26; 2) − 172

− 19

215

− 1996

74

− 3332

4 4

98

9.4 QLI

Table of 193 QLIs with weight ≤ 4.

Weight 2 QLI π2 log2(2)

(4; 2) 124 0

(4; 3) − 148

34

(5; 4) 132 0

(1; 5) − 596

18

(2; 5) − 148 0

(3; 5) 196

18

(4; 5) 0 14

Weight 2 QLI π log(2) C

(5; 2) 0 1

(5; 3) 18 0

(1; 4) 18 −1

(2; 4) 0 −1

(3; 4) 18 0

(4; 4) 12 −1

(5; 5) − 18

12

99

Weight 3 QLI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) πC

(24; 1) − 316 0 2 − 1

2

(14; 2) 0 0 2332 − 1

2

(24; 2) 0 0 − 316 0

(34; 2) 0 0 − 3332

12

(44; 2) 0 0 18 0

(55; 2) 0 0 − 78

12

(14; 3) − 532

1124

74 − 1

2

(24; 3) − 116 0 3

2 − 12

(34; 3) − 196

1124 0 0

(44; 3) − 124

23

52 −1

(55; 3) 132 0 − 21

3214

(15; 4) 164 0 − 7

64 − 18

(25; 4) 0 0 716 − 1

4

(35; 4) 164 0 21

64 − 18

(45; 4) 116 0 21

64 − 14

(11; 5) − 596

124

3532 0

(12; 5) − 332 0 41

64 0

(13; 5) − 148

124 − 7

64 0

(14; 5) − 596

112

1116 − 1

4

(22; 5) 0 0 316 0

(23; 5) 132 0 − 15

64 0

(24; 5) 0 0 − 132 0

(33; 5) 196

124 0 0

(34; 5) 196

112 − 5

814

(44; 5) 0 16 0 0

(55; 5) − 132 0 − 21

6414

100

Weight 3 QLI π3 π log2(2) C log(2) P3

(25; 1) 364

18

12 −2

(15; 2) 0 116

12 −1

(25; 2) − 132 0 0 0

(35; 2) 332

316

32 −3

(45; 2) 116

18 1 −2

(15; 3) 19384

732

12 −2

(25; 3) − 164 0 1

2 0

(35; 3) 7128

732 1 −2

(45; 3) 596

14 1 −2

(11; 4) 764

316 0 −2

(12; 4) 364

116 0 −1

(13; 4) − 132 0 −1 1

(14; 4) 964

12 − 1

2 −4

(22; 4) 116 0 0 0

(23; 4) − 564 − 3

16 −2 3

(24; 4) 332

18 −1 −2

(33; 4) − 764 − 3

16 -2 4

(34; 4) − 764 0 − 5

2 4

(44; 4) 748

54 −2 −4

(55; 4) 1192 0 0 0

(15; 5) − 19384 − 1

814 1

(25; 5) − 564 − 1

8 0 2

(35; 5) 11384 0 3

4 −1

(45; 5) − 7192 − 1

412 1

101

Weight 4 QLI π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 ) πP3 πC log(2) C2

(124; 1) − 593840 − 5

192 − 596

3564 − 5

412 − 1

4 1

(224; 1) − 1995760 0 0 35

16 0 0 0 2

(234; 1) 21111520 − 11

64132

31564

34 − 3

2 − 14 1

(244; 1) − 61576 − 17

48124

7716 1 2 −2 4

(255; 1) 535760

124 − 1

24 − 716 −1 0 − 1

4 0

(114; 2) − 52111520 − 11

96596

3532

54 1 − 1

2 2

(124; 2) − 1195760 − 5

96596

3532

54 0 0 1

(134; 2) − 371920 − 3

32332

6332

94 0 0 −1

(144; 2) − 8775760 − 1

3112

74 2 4 −2 2

(155; 2) − 15123040 − 1

48148

716

12 0 0 − 1

2

(224; 2) 72880 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(234; 2) 231440

132 − 1

32 − 2132 − 3

4 0 0 −1

(244; 2) 196

124 − 1

24 − 78 −1 0 0 0

(255; 2) − 15111520 − 1

24124

78 1 0 0 0

(334; 2) 1852304

2596 − 19

96 − 13332 − 19

4 −1 12 0

(344; 2) 1731152

13 − 1

12 − 74 −2 −4 2 −2

(355; 2) 128923040

548

148

716

12 −2 1 − 1

2

(444; 2) 130

18 − 1

8 − 218 −3 0 0 0

(455; 2) 20911520

148

124

78 1 −1 1

2 0

(114; 3) 2774608

364

796

3532 −6 −1 − 1

2 2

(124; 3) 3315760

364 − 5

327764 − 15

4 − 32 − 1

4 2

(134; 3) − 25923040 − 19

96512

23964

94 − 1

2 − 14 0

(144; 3) 19311520 − 1

481148 3 −5 0 − 5

2 4

(155; 3) − 55723040 − 19

384124

764 1 1

2 − 18 0

(224; 3) − 1615760 0 0 21

16 0 0 0 2

(234; 3) − 29480 − 43

1921796

24564

174

12 − 1

4 0

(244; 3) − 47576 − 7

48 − 124

3516 −1 2 −2 4

(255; 3) − 2335760 − 5

48124

716 1 1 − 1

4 0

(334; 3) − 2097680 − 7

644196

3516

52 0 0 0

(344; 3) − 2093840 − 11

483148

458 5 0 − 1

2 0

(355; 3) 7512

7128 0 − 21

64 0 − 12

38 0

(444; 3) − 89480 − 5

1612

398 −3 6 −6 6

(455; 3) − 67723040 − 1

24124

732 1 1

2 0 12

102

Weight 4 QLI π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 ) πP3 πC log(2) C2

(115; 4) 14311520

11384 − 1

48 − 3564 − 1

2 0 − 18

12

(125; 4) 12115360

132 − 1

32 − 716 − 3

4 0 − 18

14

(135; 4) − 2915360

3128 − 1

32 − 3564 − 3

414 − 1

414

(145; 4) 975760

112 − 7

192 − 105128 − 7

8 − 14 − 1

412

(225; 4) 15111520

124 − 1

24 − 78 −1 0 0 0

(235; 4) − 11915360 0 − 1

32 − 716 − 3

412 − 3

814

(245; 4) 43711520

1196 − 1

12 − 78 −2 − 1

2 − 14 0

(335; 4) − 7512 − 3

128 0 2164 0 1

2 − 38 0

(345; 4) 17923040

796 − 11

192 − 49128 − 11

814 − 1

2 0

(445; 4) 11180

2996 − 11

96 − 3532 − 11

4 −1 − 12 0

(555; 4) 11024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(111; 5) − 34315360

5128 − 1

16 0 − 158 0 0 0

(112; 5) 16723040

132 − 5

64 0 − 158 0 0 0

(113; 5) − 235120 − 7

128364

3532

34 0 0 0

(114; 5) 12560 − 1

96 − 196

2932 −1 0 − 1

4 1

(122; 5) 133840

596 − 5

96 0 − 54 0 0 0

(123; 5) − 22923040 − 1

16364

78

98 0 0 0

(124; 5) 897680 − 1

192 − 196

4964 − 1

4 − 12 0 1

2

(133; 5) − 7746080 − 5

384148 0 1

8 0 0 0

(134; 5) − 16711520 − 3

32548

9364

74 0 0 − 1

2

(144; 5) − 1212880 − 13

96112

2916

12 1 −1 1

(155; 5) − 1115120 − 1

16164

35128

38

12 0 − 1

4

(222; 5) − 71920 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(223; 5) − 2311520 − 1

32132 0 3

4 0 0 0

(224; 5) − 1192 − 1

48148

716

12 0 0 0

(233; 5) 46723040

332 − 5

64 − 74 − 15

8 0 0 0

(234; 5) − 794608 − 3

64132 − 7

6434

12 0 − 1

2

(244; 5) − 1180 − 1

48148

716

12 0 0 0

(255; 5) − 3617680 − 1

8116

716

32 1 0 0

(333; 5) 2095120

21128 − 9

64 − 10532 − 15

4 0 0 0

(334; 5) 2097680

1196 − 7

96 − 4516 − 5

2 0 14 0

(344; 5) 892880

596

112 − 13

1612 −1 1 −1

(355; 5) 31946080 − 1

487

19235128

78 − 1

212 − 1

4

(444; 5) 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0

(455; 5) − 11360 − 13

9611192

3564

118

12

14 0

103

Weight 4 QLI π3 log(2) π log3(2) π2C C log2(2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3

(125; 1) 3128

132

1196

18

35256 − 1

2 0 − 11536

(225; 1) 132 0 − 1

24 0 3564 0 0 − 1

768

(235; 1) − 1128

132 − 1

9618

91256 − 1

2 0 − 11536

(245; 1) 164

116 − 5

4814

105128 −1 0 − 1

768

(115; 2) 0 124 − 5

4814

35128 −1 2 0

(125; 2) 0 0 − 316 0 35

128 0 0 11536

(135; 2) 0 16 − 5

48 1 7128 −4 8 − 1

256

(145; 2) 0 112 − 1

612 0 −2 4 − 1

768

(225; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1768

(235; 2) 0 0 − 116 0 − 21

128 0 0 11536

(245; 2) 0 0 0 0 − 3564 0 0 1

768

(335; 2) 0 724 − 1

4874 − 21

128 −7 14 − 5768

(345; 2) 0 14

124

32 − 7

16 −6 12 − 1192

(445; 2) 0 16 0 1 − 35

32 −4 8 − 1768

(555; 2) 0 0 316 0 0 0 0 − 1

1024

(115; 3) 59384

1396 − 5

4814

35128 1 −12 5

768

(125; 3) 1128 − 1

32 − 796

18

77256

32 −6 5

1536

(135; 3) 17192

16 − 7

9658

29256 − 1

2 −6 51536

(145; 3) 47384

532 − 1

612

41128 1 −12 5

768

(225; 3) − 132 0 − 1

24 0 2164 0 0 0

(235; 3) 5128 − 1

32 − 796

18

21256

32 −6 5

1536

(245; 3) 164 − 1

48 − 548

14

7128 1 −4 1

384

(335; 3) 7128

1996 0 1 0 −2 0 0

(345; 3) 31384

1996 0 1 − 29

128 −1 −4 1384

(445; 3) 548

524 − 1

8 1 − 964 0 −8 1

192

(555; 3) 1128 0 3

32 0 − 63256 0 0 0

104

Weight 4 QLI π3 log(2) π log3(2) π2C C log2(2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3

(111; 4) 21128

332 0 0 0 0 −6 0

(112; 4) 364

148

13 0 0 0 −2 − 1

768

(113; 4) 3128 − 5

9616 −1 0 2 −4 1

768

(114; 4) 2364

724

548 − 1

43564 0 −16 1

192

(122; 4) 132 0 1

3 0 0 0 0 − 1384

(123; 4) − 164 − 5

4816 −1 0 2 −2 0

(124; 4) 964

116

14 − 1

4716 0 −6 0

(133; 4) − 11128 − 19

9616 −2 0 4 −2 0

(134; 4) − 364

124

1148 −2 7

64 1 2 − 1384

(144; 4) 6196

2324

524 −1 35

32 −2 −32 3256

(155; 4) 1384 0 − 1

32 0 − 35256 0 0 1

3072

(222; 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 − 1256

(223; 4) 132 0 1

6 0 0 0 0 − 1768

(224; 4) 18 0 0 0 7

8 0 0 − 1256

(233; 4) − 564 − 11

4816 −2 0 4 −2 0

(234; 4) − 764 − 1

4818 − 7

4716 −2 14 − 7

768

(244; 4) 38

13 0 −1 7

4 −4 −8 − 1768

(255; 4) 0 0 − 116 0 0 0 0 1

3072

(333; 4) − 21128 − 11

32 0 −3 0 6 0 0

(334; 4) − 2164 − 5

24148 − 15

43564 2 20 − 3

256

(344; 4) − 3596

1124

124 −4 35

32 −6 40 − 3128

(355; 4) 1384 0 − 1

32 0 21256 0 0 0

(444; 4) 78 3 0 −3 3 −12 −24 1

256

(455; 4) 196 0 − 1

16 0 − 3128 0 0 1

3072

(115; 5) − 548 − 7

96 − 596

18

29128 0 4 − 1

768

(125; 5) − 116 − 1

24 − 332 0 49

25612 1 0

(135; 5) 1192 − 1

48 − 596

12

9256 0 −1 1

1536

(145; 5) − 53384 − 3

16 − 112

14

23256

12 6 − 1

384

(225; 5) − 116 0 0 0 7

64 0 0 11536

(235; 5) 364 − 5

48 − 132 0 − 7

25672 −11 3

512

(245; 5) − 332 − 1

8 0 0 − 21128 2 0 1

1536

(335; 5) 112

132 − 1

9678 − 3

64 0 −6 51536

(345; 5) 25384 − 5

48148

34 − 61

25632 −8 7

1536

(445; 5) − 748 − 11

24 0 12 − 1

2 2 4 − 11536

(555; 5) − 1128 0 3

32 0 9256 0 0 − 1

2048

105

9.5 QPLI

Table of 172 QPLIs with weight ≤ 4.

Weight 3 QPLI π3 π log2(2) C log(2) P3

(1; 4) 124

116

12 −1

(2; 4) 796

316

32 −3

(3; 4) − 7384 − 3

32 − 12 1

(4; 4) 35384

332

12 −2

(5; 4) 124

116

12 −1

(6; 4) 796

316

32 −3

(7; 4) 548

14 2 −4

(8; 2) 132 0 0 0

(8; 3) − 332 − 3

16 − 12 3

(8; 5) − 132 − 1

16 0 1

Weight 3 QPLI π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) πC

(1; 5) 112 0 23

64 − 14

(2; 5) − 124 0 − 33

6414

(3; 5) 364 − 7

48 − 4964

14

(4; 5) 164 − 7

4878 − 1

4

(5; 5) 112 0 − 63

6414

(6; 5) − 124 0 49

64 − 14

(7; 2) 0 0 − 38 0

(7; 3) − 112 0 − 33

16 1

(7; 5) − 124 0 1

8 0

(8; 4) 0 0 78 − 1

4

106

Weight 4 QPLI π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12) πP3 πC log(2) C2

(1; 1; 5) − 51146080

− 7384

5128

0 1516

0 − 18

12

(1; 2; 5) − 417680

0 0 0 0 0 0 12

(1; 3; 5) − 26946080

1384

7384

78

716

0 − 18

0

(1; 4; 2) − 232304

− 596

596

3532

54

0 0 0

(1; 4; 3) − 354608

13192

11192

732

118

0 14

−1

(1; 4; 5) − 87723040

− 124

148

716

12

1 − 12

12

(1; 5; 4) 8946080

− 196

196

732

14

0 0 − 14

(1; 5) 234608

5192

− 5192

− 364

− 58

0 0 0

(2; 1; 5) 75746080

13384

− 17384

− 78

− 1716

0 18

− 12

(2; 2; 5) 132560

0 0 0 0 0 0 − 12

(2; 3; 5) − 20946080

− 11384

7384

0 716

0 18

0

(2; 4; 2) 6711520

132

− 132

− 2132

− 34

0 0 0

(2; 4; 3) 205923040

1564

− 1564

− 13332

− 458

−1 14

0

(2; 4; 5) 1734608

116

− 148

− 716

− 12

−1 12

− 12

(2; 5; 4) 116946080

596

196

732

14

−1 12

− 14

(2; 5) − 6723040

− 164

164

− 364

38

0 0 0

(3; 1; 5) − 2518432

− 1768

− 1128

0 12

0 18

− 12

(3; 2; 5) 239216

164

7384

− 1564

716

0 0 − 12

(3; 3; 5) 160992160

59768

− 332

− 74

− 2516

0 18

0

(3; 4; 1) 1175120

7384

5192

3564

− 54

− 12

0 0

(3; 4; 2) − 1797680

− 364

− 13192

− 15764

− 138

32

− 14

0

(3; 4; 3) − 41946080

9128

− 748

− 3916

− 138

1 − 14

0

(3; 4; 5) 959216

364

− 564

− 9764

− 12

0 38

− 12

(3; 5; 4) 16111520

13768

196

49128

14

− 12

316

− 14

(3; 5) 11710240

7768

5384

35128

− 58

− 14

0 0

(4; 1; 5) − 2910240

43768

− 31384

− 764

− 54

0 − 18

12

(4; 2; 5) 6115360

1192

− 25384

− 1564

− 2516

0 0 12

(4; 3; 5) − 25918432

− 49768

132

10564

2316

0 − 18

0

(4; 4; 2) 114123040

19192

− 5192

1164

− 58

− 32

14

1

(4; 4; 3) 25915360

41384

− 548

2964

− 58

− 12

0 0

(4; 4; 5) 19346080

364

− 764

18

− 54

0 − 38

1

(4; 5; 4) − 31746080

− 31768

148

49128

12

14

− 316

0

(4; 5) − 25930720

− 41768

596

35128

516

14

0 0

(5; 1; 5) − 2346080

1384

7384

− 764

716

0 18

− 12

(5; 2; 5) − 594608

− 548

548

78

52

0 0 − 12

(5; 3; 5) − 17346080

1384

7384

− 764

716

0 18

0

(5; 4; 1) 61723040

364

− 1164

−1 − 338

0 − 14

1

(5; 4; 2) 531152

116

0 0 0 −1 12

−2

107

Weight 4 QPLI π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12) πP3 πC log(2) C2

(5; 4; 3) − 7923040

13192

11192

− 1332

118

0 14

−1

(5; 4; 5) 52923040

132

796

3564

74

−1 34

− 32

(5; 5; 4) 39146080

5192

− 196

− 732

− 14

− 14

18

14

(5; 5) 26923040

11192

− 11192

− 4564

− 118

0 0 0

(6; 1; 5) 10146080

5384

− 3128

− 764

− 916

0 − 18

12

(6; 2; 5) − 977680

− 148

148

78

12

0 0 12

(6; 3; 5) − 3499216

− 59384

55384

21764

5516

0 − 18

0

(6; 4; 1) − 22923040

364

− 364

− 114

− 98

1 − 14

0

(6; 4; 2) − 975760

− 548

16

72

4 −1 12

0

(6; 4; 3) 52323040

− 164

164

4332

38

−1 14

0

(6; 4; 5) − 55123040

− 332

796

14764

74

0 − 14

12

(6; 5; 4) − 32946080

− 1192

− 196

− 732

− 14

14

− 18

14

(6; 5) 497680

164

− 164

− 4564

− 38

0 0 0

(7; 1; 2) 13384

548

− 548

− 3516

− 52

0 0 0

(7; 1; 3) − 1091280

− 932

596

− 7732

54

3 12

−2

(7; 1; 5) − 7384

− 132

− 124

− 4932

−1 1 0 0

(7; 2; 1) 4335760

524

− 524

− 358

−5 0 0 −2

(7; 2; 2) 72880

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(7; 2; 3) 971920

18

− 18

− 218

−3 0 0 −2

(7; 2; 5) 131152

124

− 124

− 78

−1 0 0 0

(7; 3; 2) − 1075760

− 116

116

2116

32

0 0 0

(7; 3; 3) 1852304

732

− 1996

− 13332

− 194

−1 12

0

(7; 3; 5) 5128

332

− 124

732

−1 −1 0 0

(7; 4; 2) − 1576

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(7; 4; 3) 29

1948

− 112

− 6316

−2 −6 4 −4

(7; 4; 5) 160

124

− 116

− 2116

− 32

0 0 0

(7; 5; 4) 17911520

148

124

78

1 −1 12

0

(7; 2) − 71440

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(7; 3) 1072880

18

− 18

− 278

−3 0 0 0

(7; 5) 1576

0 0 − 38

0 0 0 0

(8; 1; 4) 6111520

124

− 124

− 716

−1 0 − 18

0

(8; 2; 4) 15111520

124

− 124

− 78

−1 0 0 − 12

(8; 3; 4) − 2911520

196

− 124

− 716

−1 12

− 38

0

(8; 4; 4) 1813840

532

− 18

− 78

−3 − 12

− 14

− 12

(8; 5; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

(8; 5; 3) − 123123040

− 1196

148

0 12

32

− 38

12

(8; 5; 5) − 471440

− 17192

124

0 1 34

0 14

(8; 4) 1128

0 0 0 0 0 0 − 12

108

Weight 4 QPLI π3 log(2) π log3(2) π2C C log2(2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3

(1; 1; 4) 148

196

− 732

18

0 0 −1 1768

(1; 2; 4) 0 0 − 1748

0 0 0 0 1512

(1; 3; 4) 148

1796

− 532

98

0 −4 7 − 1384

(1; 4; 4) 112

124

− 1348

12

− 732

0 −4 1256

(1; 5; 2) 0 0 16

0 35128

0 0 − 1768

(1; 5; 3) 148

− 196

596

− 18

7128

0 1 − 1768

(1; 5; 5) − 148

148

596

0 764

−1 4 − 1384

(1; 4) 0 0 − 16

0 − 3128

0 0 1768

(2; 1; 4) 7192

1196

− 132

78

0 −2 1 0

(2; 2; 4) 0 0 148

0 0 0 0 0

(2; 3; 4) 7192

932

− 196

158

0 −6 9 − 71536

(2; 4; 4) 748

18

116

32

− 732

0 −12 5768

(2; 5; 2) 0 0 − 112

0 − 21128

0 0 11536

(2; 5; 3) − 11192

196

− 196

− 18

− 21128

−1 5 − 1512

(2; 5; 5) − 112

116

− 196

0 − 764

−3 12 − 3512

(2; 4) 0 0 112

0 − 3128

0 0 − 11536

(3; 1; 4) − 19768

25192

− 1196

78

0 −4 10 − 71536

(3; 2; 4) − 5128

332

− 116

12

0 −3 9 − 71536

(3; 3; 4) − 49768

164

− 196

− 18

0 −2 9 − 71536

(3; 4; 4) − 35384

548

− 332

58

− 7128

−6 20 − 5512

(3; 5; 1) 7768

564

− 112

12

35256

− 32

2 − 11536

(3; 5; 2) 332

0 796

− 18

− 91256

32

−9 1192

(3; 5; 3) − 7768

13192

− 196

38

− 29128

−2 5 − 1512

(3; 5; 5) 3128

− 1192

13192

− 116

− 57256

1 −4 73072

(3; 4) 7768

564

− 112

12

35256

− 32

2 − 11536

(4; 1; 4) 77768

− 164

− 732

18

0 1 −6 51536

(4; 2; 4) 3128

− 1196

− 1348

− 12

0 3 −7 71536

(4; 3; 4) 23768

− 25192

− 532

− 78

0 3 −7 71536

(4; 4; 4) 97384

− 748

− 2996

− 58

− 7128

5 −22 191536

(4; 5; 2) 0 112

1996

18

77256

− 32

1 − 1768

(4; 5; 3) 35768

564

112

12

29256

− 32

1 − 1768

(4; 5; 5) − 9128

5192

13192

116

316

−1 5 − 31024

(4; 4) − 35768

− 564

− 112

− 12

35256

32

−1 1768

(5; 1; 4) 148

− 1196

− 1996

− 58

0 3 −7 71536

(5; 2; 4) 0 − 16

− 116

−1 0 4 −8 1256

(5; 3; 4) 148

− 1196

532

− 58

0 3 −7 1384

(5; 4; 4) 112

− 14

124

− 54

− 732

7 −18 7768

(5; 5; 1) − 148

− 196

− 1196

− 18

316

0 1 0

109

Weight 4 QPLI π3 log(2) π log3(2) π2C C log2(2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3

(5; 5; 2) 0 124

116

14

− 716

−1 2 0

(5; 5; 3) 148

196

− 596

18

− 27128

0 −1 1768

(5; 5; 5) − 148

132

116

18

− 49256

−1 3 − 1768

(5; 4) 0 0 − 16

0 − 3128

0 0 1768

(6; 1; 4) 7192

− 332

132

− 38

0 3 −9 71536

(6; 2; 4) 0 − 16

− 148

−1 0 4 −8 71536

(6; 3; 4) 7192

− 332

196

− 38

0 3 −9 71536

(6; 4; 4) 748

− 14

112

− 34

− 732

9 −30 164

(6; 5; 1) − 7192

196

796

− 18

− 14

−1 5 − 1384

(6; 5; 2) 0 124

− 116

14

716

−1 2 − 1512

(6; 5; 3) 7192

− 196

196

18

29128

1 −5 1512

(6; 5; 5) − 7192

596

− 116

18

63256

−2 7 − 1256

(6; 4) 0 0 112

0 − 3128

0 0 − 11536

(7; 1; 4) 596

124

− 18

12

− 78

0 −4 1192

(7; 2; 4) 0 0 112

0 − 74

0 0 1256

(7; 3; 4) 596

1324

− 124

72

− 78

−12 20 − 1128

(7; 4; 4) 524

16

112

2 − 218

0 −16 11768

(7; 5; 2) 0 0 − 112

0 2132

0 0 − 1768

(7; 5; 3) − 796

− 124

18

− 12

0 0 4 − 1384

(7; 5; 5) − 1196

112

− 124

0 732

−4 16 − 131536

(7; 4) 0 0 16

0 − 32

0 0 1384

(8; 1; 2) 0 0 0 0 35128

0 0 − 1768

(8; 1; 3) − 332

− 548

132

− 38

77256

32

1 − 1768

(8; 1; 5) − 164

− 148

0 0 49256

12

−1 0

(8; 2; 1) 0 0 − 316

0 3564

0 0 − 11536

(8; 2; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 − 11536

(8; 2; 3) 0 0 116

0 2164

0 0 − 1768

(8; 2; 5) 0 0 0 0 764

0 0 − 13072

(8; 3; 2) 0 0 0 0 − 21128

0 0 11536

(8; 3; 3) 0 − 748

196

− 38

21256

72

−7 51536

(8; 3; 5) 132

− 124

0 0 − 7256

32

−5 1384

(8; 4; 2) 0 0 0 0 2164

0 0 − 11536

(8; 4; 3) − 116

− 16

− 124

− 12

63128

3 −2 0

(8; 4; 5) 0 − 124

0 0 35128

1 −2 13072

(8; 5; 4) 0 0 − 116

0 0 0 0 12048

(8; 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11536

(8; 3) 132

0 0 0 21128

0 0 − 11536

(8; 5) 164

0 0 0 − 21128

0 0 13072

110

9.6 QES

Table of 93 QESs with weight ≤ 4, 28 non-alternating QESs with weight 5. 10 results established

only by using level 4 MZVs [24] are dyed blue.

Weight 2 QES : QES(31;−11) =5

48π2 − 1

4log2(2)

Weight 2 QES π log(2) C

(11;−12) 12 −1

(21;−12) − 14 1

(31;−12) 18 0

Weight 3 QES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3) πC

(11, 31;−11) − 548

16 − 1

1612

(21, 31;−11) 748 − 1

62532 0

(31, 31;−11) − 112

112

316

12

(32;−11) − 148 0 2 − 1

2

(31; 21) 0 0 114 0

(31;−21) 0 0 − 2316 1

(11; 22) − 14 0 7

4 0

(21; 22) 18 0 − 7

412

(31; 22) 0 0 716 0

Weight 3 QES π3 π log2(2) C log(2) P3

(11, 11;−12) − 14 − 3

2 0 8

(11, 21;−12) 732

78 0 −6

(11, 31;−12) − 364 − 3

8 − 12 2

(12;−12) − 548 − 1

4 −2 4

(21, 21;−12) − 18 − 1

2 0 4

(21, 31;−12) 764

516 1 −3

(22;−12) 1148

12 4 −8

(31, 31;−12) − 596 − 3

16 − 12 2

(32;−12) − 11192 − 1

8 − 12 2

(11;−22) − 332 − 1

8 1 2

(21;−22) − 132 − 1

8 −2 2

(31;−22) 132

116

12 −1

111

Weight 4 QES π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 ) πP3 πC log(2) C2

(11, 11, 31;−11) − 67576 − 1

8 − 18 − 23

16 0 4 −2 2

(11, 21, 31;−11) 291152 − 7

96332

2116 − 3

4 0 12 −1

(11, 31, 31;−11) − 1912304 − 3

32 − 116 − 51

32 0 3 − 32 2

(11, 32;−11) − 1120 − 11

96316

6332

92 −1 1 0

(12, 31;−11) 548

1348 − 1

8 − 2116 −3 −2 0 0

(21, 21, 31;−11) − 23384

112 − 1

8 − 14 0 2 0 0

(21, 31, 31;−11) 1335760 − 5

48112

3516

12 0 1

2 −1

(21, 32;−11) 2032880

2396 − 9

32 − 72 − 27

4 0 − 12 1

(22, 31;−11) − 29640 − 13

48516

72

152 0 0 0

(31, 31, 31;−11) − 1674608 − 1

32 − 132 − 93

64 0 32 − 3

4 2

(31, 32;−11) 895760 − 1

64596

3564

54 − 1

214 0

(33;−11) 19911520 0 0 − 3

32 0 0 0 −1

(11, 31; 21) 13720 − 1

616

72 4 0 0 0

(21, 31; 21) − 411920

148 − 7

48 − 74 − 7

2 2 0 0

(31, 31; 21) 380 − 1

616

72 4 0 0 0

(32; 21) 79720

13 − 1

3 −7 −8 0 0 0

(11, 31;−21) − 4875760 − 1

8 − 18 − 21

8 −3 4 −2 2

(21, 31;−21) − 772880 − 5

48548

72

52 0 1 −2

(31, 31;−21) − 7240 − 1

48 − 548 − 35

16 − 52 2 −1 2

(32;−21) − 3535760 − 5

24524

358 5 0 0 0

(11, 11; 22) − 611440

16

13 0 8 0 0 0

(11, 21; 22) 911920 0 − 1

4 0 −6 0 −1 1

(11, 31; 22) − 1360 − 1

12112

78 2 0 0 0

(12; 22) − 1211440 − 1

313 7 8 0 0 0

(21, 21; 22) − 612880 − 1

2416 0 4 0 1 −2

(21, 31; 22) − 2911520

196 − 1

24 − 716 −1 1

2 − 14 0

(22; 22) 1812880

16 − 1

6 − 72 −4 0 0 −2

(31, 31; 22) 112880 − 1

24124

78 1 0 0 0

(32; 22) − 532880 − 1

12112

74 2 0 0 0

(31; 31) − 115 − 1

313 7 8 0 0 0

(31;−31) 13192

524 − 5

24 − 358 −5 0 0 0

(11; 32) 164 0 0 − 7

4 0 0 0 0

(21; 32) − 164 0 0 7

8 0 0 0 1

(31; 32) 171440

124 − 1

24 − 78 −1 0 0 0

112

Weight 4 QES π3 log(2) π log3(2) π2C C log2(2) πζ(3) log(2)P3 P4 Ψ3

(11, 11, 11;−12) 32 3 1

12 0 0 0 −96 37768

(11, 11, 21;−12) − 98 − 5

316 0 0 0 64 − 1

32

(11, 11, 31;−12) 516

23 0 1

2732 2 −28 11

768

(11, 12;−12) 524 0 − 1

12 1 0 4 −24 5384

(11, 21, 21;−12) 1116

1112

112 0 0 0 −40 5

256

(11, 21, 31;−12) − 38 − 23

4818 − 5

4 0 0 22 − 196

(11, 22;−12) − 1124 − 1

316 −4 0 0 32 − 13

768

(11, 31, 31;−12) 1996

1348 − 1

1212

2164 0 −14 11

1536

(11, 32;−12) 31192

548 − 1

4814 − 7

32 0 −10 3512

(12, 21;−12) − 548 − 1

12 0 −1 0 0 8 − 1256

(12, 31;−12) 596

124 − 5

2412

78 0 −4 1

768

(13;−12) 0 0 − 16 0 3

2 0 0 − 1384

(21, 21, 21;−12) − 38 − 1

216 0 0 0 24 − 5

384

(21, 21, 31;−12) 932

38 − 1

2432

716 −2 −12 1

192

(21, 22;−12) 1148

13 − 1

6 3 0 −4 −8 1192

(21, 31, 31;−12) − 748 − 5

1618 − 5

4 0 4 0 11536

(21, 32;−12) − 124 − 5

4818 − 1

4 0 2 −2 11536

(22, 31;−12) − 1196 − 1

4 − 16 −2 0 4 0 1

768

(23;−12) 0 0 − 13 0 − 3

16 0 0 1384

(31, 31, 31;−12) 364

18 − 11

9638

93256 − 3

2 0 0

(31, 32;−12) 11384

132 − 5

9618

35256 − 1

2 0 0

(33;−12) 164 0 − 1

48 0 3128 0 0 0

(11, 11;−22) 38

13

112 −1 0 −4 −8 1

384

(11, 21;−22) − 132

124 − 1

1252 0 0 −4 5

1536

(11, 31;−22) − 116 − 1

24548 − 1

2 − 732 0 4 − 1

512

(12;−22) 0 0 112 0 − 7

4 0 0 1256

(21, 21;−22) − 116 − 1

416 −3 0 4 0 − 1

768

(21, 31;−22) 132

316

124

54 0 −4 6 − 5

1536

(22;−22) 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 − 1

256

(31, 31;−22) 0 − 124

112 − 1

4 − 35128 1 −2 1

768

(32;−22) 0 0 148 0 − 35

64 0 0 1768

(11;−32) 116 0 0 0 7

16 0 0 − 1512

(21;−32) − 132 0 − 1

4 0 0 0 0 1512

(31;−32) 0 0 0 0 35128 0 0 − 1

1536

113

Weight 5 QES π4 log(2) π2 log3(2) log5(2) π2ζ(3) ζ(3) log2(2) ζ(5) Li4( 12

) log(2) Li5( 12

)

(31; 41) 0 0 0 − 23

0 374

0 0

(11; 42) − 148

0 0 − 732

0 318

0 0

(31; 42) 0 0 0 − 18

0 9364

0 0

(11, 31; 31) 0 49

− 815

− 112

−7 30716

−16 −16

(31, 31; 31) 0 49

− 815

14

−7 1318

−16 −16

(32; 31) 0 0 0 1912

0 − 1338

0 0

(11, 11; 32) − 116

0 0 − 748

72

318

0 0

(12; 32) 0 0 0 4948

0 − 938

0 0

(11, 31; 32) − 17720

− 112

112

0 74

13128

2 0

(32; 32) 0 0 0 2996

0 − 21764

0 0

(31, 31; 32) 0 − 118

115

596

78

− 15564

2 2

(11, 11, 31; 21) 0 49

− 815

38

−7 42116

−16 −16

(11, 31, 31; 21) 0 49

− 815

2348

−7 91732

−16 −16

(11, 32; 21) 0 − 49

815

2348

7 − 58132

16 16

(12, 31; 21) 0 0 0 − 524

0 10116

0 0

(31, 31, 31; 21) 0 13

− 25

4348

− 214

492

−12 −12

(31, 32; 21) 9 − 29

415

148

72

− 154

8 8

(33; 21) 0 0 0 − 1112

0 19716

0 0

(11, 11, 11; 22) 61240

− 13

− 25

724

0 − 127132

0 48

(11, 11, 31; 22) 190

19

− 115

732

− 74

− 21764

0 8

(11, 12; 22) 121720

29

− 215

724

−7 − 58932

0 16

(11, 31, 31; 22) − 111440

112

− 112

35192

− 74

465128

−2 0

(11, 32; 22) 531440

118

− 130

35192

− 74

− 651128

0 4

(12, 31; 22) 0 29

− 415

− 732

− 72

71364

−8 −8

(13; 22) 0 0 0 − 43

0 312

0 0

(31, 31, 31; 22) 0 112

− 110

31192

− 2116

9316

−3 −3

(31, 32; 22) 0 118

− 115

− 164

− 78

9332

−2 −2

(33; 22) 0 0 0 − 548

0 9364

0 0

114

9.7 GES

Table of 39 GESs with weight ≤ 5. We abbreviate GES(a, b, c; d) as GES(abc; d) and so on.

Weight 1 GES : GES(1; 0) = 2 log(2)

Weight 2 GES π2 log2(2)

(2; 0) 16 −1

(11; 0) 16 1

(1; 1) 112 0

Weight 3 GES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3)

(3; 0) − 16

13

74

(12; 0) 0 − 13

32

(111; 0) 13

13 1

(2; 1) 0 0 58

(11; 1) 0 0 78

(1; 2) − 112 0 1

Weight 4 GES π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 )

(4; 0) 0 0 0 0 2

(13; 0) − 1240 − 1

1216

32 2

(22; 0) 1360 − 1

616 1 2

(112; 0) 7180 0 − 1

6 0 −2

(1111; 0) 31120

76 − 5

6 −15 −22

(3; 1) − 1288 − 1

24124

78 1

(12; 1) − 1720 − 1

24124

78 1

(111; 1) 572

524 − 5

24 − 358 −5

(2; 2) 11440 − 1

24124

14 1

(11; 2) 371440

124 − 1

24 − 74 −1

(1; 3) 1720 0 1

24 − 18 1

115

Weight 5 GES π4 log(2) π2 log3(2) log5(2) π2ζ(3) ζ(3) log2(2) ζ(5) Li4( 12) log(2) Li5( 1

2)

(5; 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

(14; 0) − 1360

0 − 160

− 148

18

74

0 0

(23; 0) 1180

118

− 130

316

− 98

− 2916

0 2

(113; 0) − 19360

− 118

115

− 748

198

14716

0 −6

(122; 0) 190

0 160

516

− 118

− 32

0 0

(1112; 0) − 1360

− 19

160

− 516

158

778

0 −4

(11111; 0) 89

109

− 712

− 8548

− 2158

− 1954

0 72

(4; 1) 0 136

− 130

796

− 716

2732

−1 −1

(13; 1) 0 − 112

110

− 748

2116

− 3164

3 3

(22; 1) 0 736

− 730

4996

− 4916

3116

−7 −7

(112; 1) 0 − 112

110

− 796

2116

− 3132

3 3

(1111; 1) 0 512

− 12

− 3596

− 10516

34116

−15 −15

(3; 2) 1288

− 572

11120

− 748

78

− 8164

3 4

(12; 2) 1720

− 172

140

148

0 − 3132

1 2

(111; 2) − 572

1372

− 31120

− 748

− 74

27916

−9 −14

(2; 3) − 11440

772

− 13120

2396

− 2316

2364

−3 −2

(11; 3) − 371440

172

− 140

− 332

716

27964

−1 −2

(1; 4) − 1720

− 136

140

− 112

12

132

1 2

116

9.8 BES

Table of 26 BESs with weight ≤ 5. We abbreviate BES(a, b, c; d) as BES(abc; d) and so on. Also

we write BES(0; k) =∑∞n=1

(2nn )

4nnk.

Weight 1 BES : BES(0; 1) = 2 log(2)

Weight 2 BES : BES(0; 2) =π2

6− 2 log2(2), BES(1; 1) =

π2

3

Weight 3 BES π2 log(2) log3(2) ζ(3)

(0; 3) − 13

43 2

(1; 2) − 23 0 9

2

(2; 1) 0 0 32

(11; 1) 0 0 212

Weight 4 BES π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 )

(0; 4) 140

13 − 2

3 −4 0

(1; 3) − 13360

13

13 −2 8

(2; 2) 130 0 0 −3 0

(11; 2) − 745 − 4

343 7 32

(3; 1) 37360

13 − 1

3 −7 −8

(12; 1) 49360

13 − 1

3 −7 −8

(111; 1) 2372 − 5

353 35 40

Weight 5 BES π4 log(2) π2 log3(2) log5(2) π2ζ(3) ζ(3) log2(2) ζ(5) Li4( 12) log(2) Li5( 1

2)

(0; 5) − 120

− 29

415

− 13

4 6 0 0

(1; 4) 13180

− 29

− 215

− 56

2 − 238

0 16

(2; 3) − 115

49

− 815

13

−4 1238

−16 −16

(11; 3) 1445

49

0 − 23

0 − 4658

16 80

(3; 2) − 37180

− 29

215

− 712

7 2038

0 −16

(12; 2) − 49180

23

− 1415

112

−7 2174

−32 −48

(111; 2) − 2336

− 149

3815

3512

7 − 2172

96 176

(4; 1) 0 − 49

815

− 712

7 − 638

16 16

(13; 1) 0 − 49

815

− 74

7 314

16 16

(22; 1) 0 49

− 815

712

−7 938

−16 −16

(112; 1) 0 43

− 85

− 712

−21 5898

−48 −48

(1111; 1) 0 − 289

5615

774

49 18298

112 112

117

9.9 IBES

Table of 14 IBESs with weight ≤ 5. We abbreviate IBES(a, b, c; d) as IBES(abc; d) and so on.

Also we write IBES(0; k) =∑∞n=1

4n

nk(2nn )

.

Weight 2 IBES : IBES(0; 2) =π2

2

Weight 3 IBES : IBES(0; 3) = π2 log(2)− 7ζ(3)

2, IBES(1; 2) =

7ζ(3)

2+ π2 log(2)

Weight 4 IBES π4 π2 log2(2) log4(2) ζ(3) log(2) Li4( 12 )

(0; 4) − 19360

23

13 0 8

(1; 3) 190

43 − 1

3 0 −8

(2; 2) − 190

23

13 0 8

(11; 2) 920 2 −1 0 −24

Weight 5 IBES π4 log(2) π2 log3(2) log5(2) π2ζ(3) ζ(3) log2(2) ζ(5) Li4( 12) log(2) Li5( 1

2)

(0; 5) − 19180

49

215

1 0 318

0 −16

(1; 4) 145

89

− 215

12

0 − 312

0 16

(2; 3) − 145

49

215

14

0 314

0 −16

(11; 3) 910

43

− 25

− 74

0 −62 0 48

(3; 2) − 19180

49

215

− 34

0 2178

0 −16

(12; 2) 19180

89

− 215

32

0 − 1558

0 16

(111; 2) 9136

169

− 23

3 0 − 1558

0 80

9.10 QBES, IQBES

Tabulated in subsection 8-3-4 already.

118

10 Miscellaneous

We tabulate some typical results without proof. All can be derived using methods above.

10.1 LSI ∫ π2

0

x2 cot(x) log(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx

=π2ζ(3)

12− 31ζ(5)

64− 7

8ζ(3) log2(2) +

1

12π2 log3(2)− 1

192π4 log(2)

∫ π2

0

x log2(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx

= Li5

(1

2

)+ Li4

(1

2

)log(2)− 155ζ(5)

128− π2ζ(3)

192+

7

16ζ(3) log2(2) +

log5(2)

30− 1

36π2 log3(2)

∫ π2

0

x2 log(2 sin(x)) log2(2 cos(x)) dx

= −πLi5

(1

2

)−πLi4

(1

2

)log(2)+

3π3ζ(3)

64+

121πζ(5)

128− 7

16πζ(3) log2(2)− 1

30π log5(2)+

1

36π3 log3(2)

∫ π2

0

x log3(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx

=9

4ES(1;−5)− 1

8π2Li4

(1

2

)+ 6Li6

(1

2

)+ 3Li4

(1

2

)log2(2) + 6Li5

(1

2

)log(2) +

3ζ(3)2

2

−1579π6

161280+

7

8ζ(3) log3(2) +

log6(2)

12− 7

64π2ζ(3) log(2)− 13

192π2 log4(2) +

1

192π4 log2(2)

∫ π2

0

x4 log2(2 sin(x)) dx

=3

2πES(1;−5) +

1

2π3Li4

(1

2

)+

7

16π3ζ(3) log(2)− 269π7

40320+

1

48π3 log4(2)− 1

48π5 log2(2)

119

10.2 PLSI ∫ π2

0

xTi2(tan(x)) log(2 sin(x)) dx

=7

4πLi4

(1

2

)+

49

32πζ(3) log(2)− 163π5

11520+

7

96π log4(2)− 7

96π3 log2(2)

∫ π2

0

Cl2(2x) log(2 sin(x)) log(2 cos(x)) dx

= 2Li5

(1

2

)+ 2Li4

(1

2

)log(2)− 279ζ(5)

128+

7

8ζ(3) log2(2) +

log5(2)

15− 1

18π2 log3(2)

∫ π2

0

Cl2(4x) log2(2 cos(x)) dx

= 16Li5

(1

2

)+ 16Li4

(1

2

)log(2)− 465ζ(5)

32− 7π2ζ(3)

48+ 7ζ(3) log2(2) +

8 log5(2)

15− 4

9π2 log3(2)

∫ π2

0

xCl2(4x) cot(x) log(2 sin(2x)) dx

= 16Li4

(1

2

)log(2)− 23π2ζ(3)

48+

31ζ(5)

4+ 14ζ(3) log2(2) +

2 log5(2)

3− 2

3π2 log3(2)− 151

720π4 log(2)

10.3 ITF ∫ ∞0

log2(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x)2

x4dx

= −πζ(3)

6+π3

18− 4

9π log3(2) +

4

3π log2(2)− 2

9π3 log(2) +

4

3π log(2)

∫ ∞0

log2(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x)3

x2dx

= 24Li5

(1

2

)+

3π2ζ(3)

8− 93ζ(5)

2− 1

5log5(2) +

4

3π2 log3(2) +

47

60π4 log(2)

∫ ∞0

log2(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x)2

x(x2 + 1)dx

= 8Li5

(1

2

)− 3π2ζ(3)

8− 217ζ(5)

16− 1

15log5(2) +

4

9π2 log3(2) +

79

360π4 log(2)

120

10.4 QLI (W = 5) ∫ 1

0

x log2(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x)2

x2 + 1dx

=1

4πC log2(2)+2π=(Li4(1+i))+π log(2)=(Li3(1+i))+8<

(Li5

(1

2+i

2

))−8Li5

(1

2

)− 5

4Li4

(1

2

)log(2)

−π2ζ(3)

8+

465ζ(5)

512+

35

64ζ(3) log2(2)+

log5(2)

80− 119

576π2 log3(2)− 2473π4 log(2)

23040−π(ψ(3)

(14

)− ψ(3)

(34

))3072∫ 1

0

log2(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x)2

x2 + 1dx

= −8√

2 6F5

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2;

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2;

1

2

)− 1

8π2C log(2)− 1

4π2=(Li3(1 + i))− 8=

(Li5

(1

2+i

2

))

+5

8πLi4

(1

2

)+

61

64πζ(3) log(2) +

709π5

15360+

1

24π log4(2) +

9

128π3 log2(2) +

log(2)(ψ(3)

(14

)− ψ(3)

(34

))1536

10.5 QLSI ∫ π4

0

x log2(sin(x)) dx

=1

8πC log(2) +

1

4π=(Li3(1 + i)) +

5Li4(

12

)16

− 35

128ζ(3) log(2)− 11π4

1152+

5 log4(2)

384+

1

384π2 log2(2)

∫ π4

0

log3(2 cos(x)) dx

= 3=(Li4(1 + i))− 3

2log(2)=(Li3(1 + i)) +

3

8C log2(2)− 3πζ(3)

8+

1

16π log3(2)−

ψ(3)(

14

)− ψ(3)

(34

)2048∫ π

4

0

log(2 sin(x)) log2(2 cos(x)) dx

=1

8C log2(2)+=(Li4(1+ i))+

πζ(3)

16− 1

2log(2)=(Li3(1+ i))+

1

48π log3(2)−

5(ψ(3)

(14

)− ψ(3)

(34

))6144

121

10.6 NLI ∫ 1

0

log3(1− x) log2(x+ 1) dx

= 24Li4

(1

2

)+ 24Li5

(1

2

)− 2π2ζ(3) + 45ζ(3) +

3ζ(5)

4+ 12ζ(3) log2(2)− 24ζ(3) log(2) +

π4

30+ 6π2 − 120

+3 log5(2)

5−3 log4(2)− 2

3π2 log3(2)+16 log3(2)+2π2 log2(2)−48 log2(2)− 1

30π4 log(2)−6π2 log(2)+96 log(2)

∫ 1

0

log2(1− x) log2(x) log2(x+ 1)

x2dx

= −8ES(1;−5)− 8

3π2Li4

(1

2

)+ 8Li4

(1

2

)+ 24Li5

(1

2

)+ 16Li6

(1

2

)+ 8Li4

(1

2

)log2(2)

+24Li4

(1

2

)log(2) + 16Li5

(1

2

)log(2) +

19π2ζ(3)

6− 227ζ(3)2

8− 62ζ(5)− 7ζ(3) log3(2)

−35

2ζ(3) log2(2)− 9ζ(3) log(2)− 217

2ζ(5) log(2) +

35

6π2ζ(3) log(2) +

π4

90+

25π6

378+

2 log6(2)

9

+4 log5(2)

5− 5 log4(2)

3− 5

18π2 log4(2) +

2

3π2 log3(2) + π2 log2(2) +

13

36π4 log2(2) +

1

6π4 log(2)

∫ 1

0

log2(1− x) log2(x) log2(x+ 1) dx

= −4ES(1;−5)−16

3π2Li4

(1

2

)−32Li4

(1

2

)+24Li5

(1

2

)−16Li6

(1

2

)−8Li4

(1

2

)log2(2)+24Li4

(1

2

)log(2)

−16Li5

(1

2

)log(2)+

275ζ(3)2

8+

34π2ζ(3)

3−237ζ(3)−341ζ(5)

2+7ζ(3) log3(2)−91

2ζ(3) log2(2)−77

6π2ζ(3) log(2)

+156ζ(3) log(2)+217

2ζ(5) log(2)+

73π6

3024−40π2− 29π4

45+720− 2

9log6(2)+

4 log5(2)

5− 1

18π2 log4(2)+

2 log4(2)

3

+2

3π2 log3(2)− 24 log3(2)− 1

36π4 log2(2)− 8π2 log2(2) + 144 log2(2) +

2

3π4 log(2) + 32π2 log(2)− 480 log(2)

10.7 NPLI ∫ 1

0Li2

(1− x

2

)Li2

(x− 1

x+ 1

)log(x+ 1) dx

= 6Li4

(1

2

)− 24Li5

(1

2

)− 18Li4

(1

2

)log(2) +

π2ζ(3)

12−

3ζ(3)

2+

189ζ(5)

8−

21

4ζ(3) log2(2) +

23

4ζ(3) log(2)

−43π4

720−π2

4−

3 log5(2)

5+

log4(2)

3+ log3(2) +

17

36π2 log3(2) + 3 log2(2)−

3

8π2 log2(2) +

1

3π2 log(2)−

29

360π4 log(2)

∫ 1

0Li3

(x+ 1

2

)log(x) log(1− x) dx

= −7Li4

(1

2

)+11Li5

(1

2

)+4Li4

(1

2

)log(2)+

49π2ζ(3)

96−10ζ(3)−

463ζ(5)

32+

21

16ζ(3) log2(2)−

11

4ζ(3) log(2)+

121π4

1440

−13π2

6+20+

3 log5(2)

40−

5 log4(2)

24−

1

24π2 log3(2)+

log3(2)

3+

5

24π2 log2(2)−3 log2(2)+

1

288π4 log(2)+

2

3π2 log(2)+12 log(2)

122

10.8 NQLI ∫ 1

0

log(1− x) log(x+ 1) log(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x) dx

= C2 − 5π2C

24+πC

2− 4C − 1

2πC log(2)− C log(2) +

1

2π=(Li3(1 + i)) + 10=(Li3(1 + i))

−24=(Li4(1 + i)) + 3 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))−13Li4

(12

)4

+105πζ(3)

128− 19ζ(3)

32− 163

64ζ(3) log(2)

+247π4

23040+

7π2

24− 11π3

48− 3π − 1

6log4(2) +

log3(2)

4+

5

16π log3(2) +

9

64π2 log2(2)− 3 log2(2)

2

−13

8π log2(2) +

5

24π3 log(2)− 7

48π2 log(2) +

5

2π log(2) + 6 log(2) +

3

256

(ψ(3)

(1

4

)− ψ(3)

(3

4

))

Using∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0f(x)−f(y)

x−y dxdy = 2∫ 1

0f(t)(log(t)− log(1− t)) dt for certain continuous f :

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

log(x+ 1) log(x2 + 1

)tan−1(x)− log(y + 1) log

(y2 + 1

)tan−1(y)

x− y dxdy

=5π2C

24+πC+8C+

1

2C log2(2)−1

2πC log(2)−2C log(2)−16=(Li3(1+i))+40=(Li4(1+i))−4 log(2)=(Li3(1+i))

+2Li4

(1

2

)− 49πζ(3)

32− 33ζ(3)

8+

57

16ζ(3) log(2) +

5π3

12− π2

4− 209π4

11520+

7 log4(2)

48− log3(2)

3− 2

3π log3(2)

− 3

16π2 log2(2) +

9

4π log2(2) + log2(2)− 37

96π3 log(2) +

3

8π2 log(2)− π log(2)− 7

384

(ψ(3)

(1

4

)− ψ(3)

(3

4

))

Now recall subsection 8-1-2 and 8-4-9 for higher weight:

∫ 1

0

log5(x2 + 1

)dx

= −1920√

2 6F5

(1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2,

1

2;

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2,

3

2;

1

2

)+ 1920C − 40C log3(2) + 240C log2(2)

−960C log(2)−1920=(Li3(1+i))+1920=(Li4(1+i))−240 log2(2)=(Li3(1+i))+960 log(2)=(Li3(1+i))

−960 log(2)=(Li4(1+i))−240πζ(3)+360πζ(3) log(2)+19π5

3+70π3+960π−3840+log5(2)+

135

2π log4(2)

−10 log4(2)− 240π log3(2) + 80 log3(2) +145

4π3 log2(2) + 600π log2(2)− 480 log2(2)− 70π3 log(2)

−960π log(2) + 1920 log(2)−5ψ(3)

(14

)16

+5ψ(3)

(34

)16

+5

32log(2)ψ(3)

(1

4

)− 5

32log(2)ψ(3)

(3

4

)

123

10.9 NQPLI ∫ 1

0

Ti2(x) log(x+ 1) log(x2 + 1

)dx

= −π2C

24+ πC + 4C +

1

2C log2(2)− 3

4πC log(2)− 3C log(2) + π=(Li3(1 + i))

−4=(Li3(1 + i))− 2=(Li4(1 + i)) + 3 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))− 2Li4

(1

2

)+

63πζ(3)

128

−97ζ(3)

32− 7

8ζ(3) log(2) +

13π3

96+π2

12− 29π4

5760− 3π − 1

12log4(2) +

log3(2)

12− 1

6π log3(2)

+1

48π2 log2(2)− 1

8π log2(2)− log2(2)− 1

16π3 log(2)− 1

48π2 log(2) + 2π log(2) + 6 log(2)

∫ 1

0

Li2(−x2

)log(x+ 1) log

(x2 + 1

)dx

= −4C2 − π2C

12− 4πC + 16C + 7C log2(2) + 4πC log(2)− 24C log(2)− 6π=(Li3(1 + i))

+40=(Li3(1 + i)) + 40=(Li4(1 + i))− 24 log(2)=(Li3(1 + i))− 2Li4

(1

2

)+

73ζ(3)

8− 7πζ(3)

4

−63

16ζ(3) log(2) +

2π4

9− 13π3

12− π2

12+ 18π − 96− 1

12log4(2) +

10 log3(2)

3+

13

12π log3(2) +

5

16π2 log2(2)

−1

2π log2(2)− 25 log2(2) +

5

48π3 log(2) +

1

3π2 log(2)− 11π log(2) + 84 log(2)− 1

64

(ψ(3)

(1

4

)− ψ(3)

(3

4

))

10.10 NS, MLI

∞∑m=1

(−1)m−1Hm

m

m∑n=1

(−1)n−1H(2)n

n=

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

log(x) log(1− y) log(

1−xy1−y

)(1− x)y(y + 1)

dxdy

= 6Li5

(1

2

)+

11π2ζ(3)

48− 49ζ(5)

8− 1

2ζ(3) log2(2)− 1

20log5(2) +

1

36π2 log3(2) +

13

360π4 log(2)

∞∑m=1

(−1)m−1(H̃m

)2

m

m∑n=1

(−1)n−1Hn

n=

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

log(1− z) log( (1−x)(1−y)(1−z)(1−xyz)2(xy+1)(xz+1)(yz+1) )

(x+ 1)(y + 1)(z + 1)dxdydz

= 22Li5

(1

2

)+π2ζ(3)

8− 349ζ(5)

16− 5

8ζ(3) log2(2)− 17 log5(2)

60− 7

72π2 log3(2) +

43

240π4 log(2)

∞∑m=1

(−1)m−1H̃m

m

m∑n=1

(−1)n−1HnH̃n

n

124

=

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

log(1− y) log(

(1−y)(1−z)2(yz+1)

)(x+ 1)(y + 1)(z + 1)

dxdydz −∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

∫ 1

0

x log(1− y) log(

(1−z)(xy+1)2(1−xyz)

)(x+ 1)(z + 1)(1− xy)

dxdydz

= 14Li5

(1

2

)+π2ζ(3)

12− 115ζ(5)

8− 3

8ζ(3) log2(2)− 11 log5(2)

60− 1

18π2 log3(2) +

23

180π4 log(2)

Denote f(t) = t1+t , then by symmetry:

ES(1,−1,−1,−1;−1) =

∫(0,1)4

(f(−wxyz)− 3f(xyz) + 3f(−xy)− f(x)) log(1− x)

x(y + 1)(z + 1)(w + 1)dxdydzdw

= 2Li5

(1

2

)+

13π2ζ(3)

96− 83ζ(5)

32+

9

16ζ(3) log2(2)− 13

60log5(2) +

41

72π2 log3(2)− 1

180π4 log(2)

Let dµ = dxdydzdw, p1 = x(z+1)(1−xy) + 1

(y+1)(z+1) , p2 = x2y(1−xy)(xyz+1) , p3 = y

(y+1)(1−yz) , q1 =

f(w) + zf(−zw), q2 = f(w) + xyzf(−xyzw), q3 = f(w)− yzf(yzw), f(t) = log(2)−log(1−t)1+t , then:

∑1≤j≤k≤l≤m≤n

(−1)j−1(−1)k−1(−1)l−1(−1)m−1(−1)n−1

jklmn

=

∫(0,1)4

p1q1 − p2q2 + p3q3x+ 1

dµ =π2ζ(3)

48+

3ζ(5)

16+

1

8ζ(3) log2(2) +

log5(2)

120+

1

72π2 log3(2) +

1

160π4 log(2)

10.11 Miscellaneous

By x→ tan(u), IBP twice, contour deformation and brute force:∫ tan(a)

0

tan−1(x)n dx = nan−1 log(2 cos(a)) + an tan(a)− n(n− 1)<(X),

X = (−1)n−1 (1− 21−n) (n−2)!ζ(n)−(2ia)n−2Li2(−e2ia

)+

n−2∑k=1

(−1)k−1(n− 2)!(2ia)−k+n−2Lik+2

(−e2ia

)(2i)n−1(−k + n− 2)!

By repeated IBP and definition of Ls [10] :

∫ 1

0

logn(x2 + 1

)dx =

n∑k=0

(−2)kn!

(n− k)!

(logn−k(2)− (n− k)(−2)n−k

−k+n−1∑j=0

(− log(2))j(−k + n− 1

j

)A(j, k, n)

),

A(j, k, n) = lim{a,b}→{0,0}

∂−j−k+n−1

∂a−j−k+n−1

(2a+b−1B

(a+ 1

2,b+ 1

2

))+

1

2Lsn−k−j

(π2

)

125

11 Comments

LI/PLI/QLI/QPLI/ES/QESs evaluation are superficies. MZV theory is the essence.

Superficies: This paper summarizes nearly all known methods of generating LI/PLI/QLI/QPLI

relations without using MZVs, resulting in closed-forms of LI/PLI with W ≤ 5, QLI/QPLI with

W ≤ 4. Since for higher weights irreducible constants are inevitable in both cases, in the sense

of ‘expressing these integrals in polylog closed-forms’ nothing more can be done. Nevertheless,

while ESs are evaluated by totally MZV-free methods, we seek for help from level 4 MZV due to

huge difficulties on solving the last 10 QESs. This shows the boundary of elementary methods and

reveals the necessity of establishing a deeper theory.

Essence: MZV theory offers a more essential way of establishing relations between higher weight

LI/ES/PLIs [6, 18]. For QLI/QES/QPLIs, though not fully developed, it is clear that QMZV theory

(focusing on quadratic MZVs i.e. multiple polylogarithms of level 4) is their essence. [24] provides

good example for W ≤ 5, which is sufficient for problems discussed here. Furthermore, a successful

investigation on poly-MZVs (level 2n) will be producing much more seemingly incomprehensible but

profound results. For instance, the theory of logsine integrals with argument π3 and corresponding

Apery-binomial series [10], should be natural consequences of solving level 6 MZV system.

126

Acknowledgements

1. Special thanks to following contributors for crucial improvements of corresponding sections:

K. C. Au: For introducing me this general topic through establishment of section 2 and level

4 MZV through that of subsection 7-8, as well as offering important techniques that I used to

complete subsection 5-1, 8-4-7.

Chen: For introducing me the basic FL theory, offering problems of subsection 8-3-2, 8-4-10(4)

and the latter’s solution.

J. D’Aurizio: For further explanation on FL theory, suggestions on hypergeometric represen-

tation in subsection 8-3-4 part 2, and derivation of FL expansion of f(x)x in part 3, given that of f(x).

A. Shather: For suggestions on double integration in subsection 6-10-1, 8-5-1, offering problem

of 8-4-9(6) and its solution.

C. I. Valean: For his challenging problem book [15], offering insights on QLI/QPLI evaluation

from which I developed section 5, 6 later.

2. I also appreciate following Math. SE users for presenting interesting problems, solutions on

related topics, or minor suggestions on this article:

Cody, FDP, M.N.C.E., Renascence 5, Tunk-Fey, user 178256, user 1591719, user 97357329,

xuce1234, Zacky. Please forgive if I’ve forgotten someone.

3. Last but not least, I am grateful to my family and friends for always supporting me during

this paper’s reformulation.

Thank you all.

127

References

[1] Au, K. C. (2019). Linear relations between logarithmic integrals of high weight and some closed-form

evaluations. arXiv preprint arXiv :1910.12113. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.12113

[2] Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (1994). Experimental Evaluation of Euler Sums.

Experimental Mathematics, 3(1), 17-30.

[3] Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (2004). Experiments in Mathematics: Computational

Paths to Discovery. DBLP.

[4] Blumlein, J. (2009). Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms at Weight w = 6.

arXiv preprint arXiv : 0901.0837. https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.0837

[5] Blumlein, J. (2009). Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms up to Weight

w = 5. arXiv preprint arXiv : 0901.3106. https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3106

[6] Blumlein, J., Broadhurst, D. J., Vermaseren, J. A. M. (2009). The Multiple Zeta Value Data Mine.

Computer Physics Communications, 2009, 181(3):582-625.

[7] Borwein, D., Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (1995). Explicit Evaluation of Euler Sums. Proceedings

of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 38(02), 277.

[8] Borwein, J. M., Chamberland, M. (2007). Integer Powers of Arcsin. International Journal of

Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Volume 2007, Article ID: 19381.

[9] Borwein, J. M., Girgensohn, R. (1996). Evaluation of Triple Euler Sums. The Electronic Journal of

Combinatorics, 3, #R23.

[10] Borwein, J. M., Straub, A. (2011). Special values of generalized log-sine integrals.

[11] Flajolet, P., Salvy, B. (1998). Euler Sums and Contour Integral Representations. Experimental

Mathematics, 7(1), 15-35.

[12] Freitas, P. (2005). Integrals of polylogarithmic functions, recurrence relations, and associated euler

sums. Mathematics of Computation, 74(251), 1425-1440.

128

[13] Gradshteyn, I. S., Ryzhik, I. M. (2015). Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic Press,

New York, 8th edition.

[14] Lewin, L. (1981). Polylogarithms and Associated Functions. New York, North-Holland.

[15] Valean, C. I. (2019). (Almost) Impossible Integrals, Sums, and Series. Springer, New York.

[16] Valean, C. I. (2019). A simple idea to calculate a class of polylogarithmic integrals by using the Cauchy

product of squared Polylogarithm function. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337739055

[17] Valean, C. I. (2019). The derivation of eighteen special challenging logarithmic integrals.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334598773

[18] Vermaseren, J. A. M. (1998). Harmonic sums, mellin transforms and integrals. International Journal

of Modern Physics A, 14(13), 2037-2076.

[19] Xu, C. (2017). Evaluations of Euler-Type Sums of Weight ≤ 5. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical

Sciences Society, 1-31.

[20] Xu, C. (2017). Multiple zeta values and Euler sums. Journal of Number Theory, 177(Complete):443-

478.

[21] Xu, C., Cai, Y. L. (2016). On Harmonic Numbers and Nonlinear Euler Sums. arXiv preprint

arXiv :1609.04924. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04924

[22] Xu, C., Cheng, J. F. (2016). Some Results on Euler Sums. Functiones et Approximatio, 54(1), 25-37.

[23] Cantarini. M., D’ Aurizio. J. (2018). On the interplay between hypergeometric series, Fourier-Legendre

expansions and Euler sums. arXiv preprint arXiv :1806.08411. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08411.

[24] Au, K. C. (2020). Mathematica package MultipleZetaValues.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342344452

129

Euler sums - arXiv · 2020-03-13 · Euler sums Ming Hao Zhao 2020.3.12 Abstract The main purpose...

Documents

Transcript of Euler sums - arXiv · 2020-03-13 · Euler sums Ming Hao Zhao 2020.3.12 Abstract The main purpose...