ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs...

21
ERT 312 ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Accident & Loss Statistics Statistics

Transcript of ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs...

Page 1: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

ERT 312ERT 312LECTURE 2

Accident & Loss Statistics Accident & Loss Statistics

Page 2: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Accident & Loss Statistics Accident & Loss Statistics

A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs

An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working correctly

Taken by average, thus not reflect for single events involving substantial losses

Page 3: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

3 ALS Systems:3 ALS Systems:OSHA Incidence RateFatal Accident Rate (FAR)Fatality Rate, or Death per

Person per Year

Page 4: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

OSHA Incidence RateOSHA Incidence RateBased on cases/100 worker yearsA standard worker year = 2000

hours◦50 weeks/year x 40 hours/week

Therefore, OSHA IR is based on 200,000 hours of worker exposure to a hazard◦100 worker years x 2000 hours

Page 5: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Number of lost workdays

Injury and illness (Equation 1)

Lost workdays (Equation 2)

Page 6: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Question 1.9 Question 1.9 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)(Crowl & Louvar, 2002)

A university has 1200 full-time employees. In a particular year this university had 38 reportable lost-time injuries and 274 lost workdays. Compute the OSHA IR based on injuries and lost workdays.

Assume an employee works for 8hr, 250 days/year

Page 7: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Answers:Answers:OSHA IR (Injury and Illness) =

3.17OSHA IR (Lost workdays) = 22.83

Page 8: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

FARFARBritish chemical industryBased on 1000 employees

working their entire lifetimeTotal working years/employee =

50 yearsTherefore, FAR is based on 108

working hours

Page 9: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Equation 3

Page 10: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Question 1.3 Question 1.3 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)(Crowl & Louvar, 2002)

Assuming that a car travels at an average speed of 50 km/h, how many kilometres must be driven before a fatality is expected?

Assume FAR for travelling by car=57 deaths/108

Page 11: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Answer:Answer:Refer to table 1.4, FAR travelling

by car is 57 deaths/108 hours.Speed = 50 km/hA death will occur every 108/57 =

1.75 x 106 hours.Therefore, distance before a

death occur = 87.5 x 106 miles

Page 12: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Fatality RateFatality RateIndependent of the number of

hours actually workedBased on the general populationFAR Fatality rate

Page 13: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Question 1.5 Question 1.5 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)(Crowl & Louvar, 2002)

A plant employs 1500 full-time workers in a process with a FAR of 5. How many industrial related deaths are expected per year?

Page 14: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Answer:Answer:Expected industrial related death

per year = 0.15

Page 15: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

NATURE OF ACCIDENT PROCESS & SEQUENCE

Page 16: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Table 1: Common Chemical Table 1: Common Chemical Plant Accidents Plant Accidents (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)(Crowl & Louvar, 2002)

Type of Accident

Probability of Occurrence

Potential for Fatalities

Potential for Economic Loss

Fire High Low Intermediate

Explosion Intermediate Intermediate High

Toxic Release

Low High Low

Page 17: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Causes of LossesCauses of LossesMechanical failureOperator errorProcess upsetsNatural hazardsDesign FlawSabotage/ArsonUnknown ???

Page 18: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

Accident 3-Step SequenceAccident 3-Step Sequence

InitiationPropagationTermination

Page 19: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

InitiationInitiationThe event that starts the

accident

Example: Mr. A threw away a burned cigarette bud into dried bushes

Page 20: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

PropagationPropagationThe event or events that maintain

or expand the accident

Example:A portion of dried bushes ignited, releasing thick smoke and hot flame. Fire starts to progress to another part of bushes

Page 21: ERT 312 LECTURE 2 Accident & Loss Statistics. A measure of the effectiveness of the safety programs An indicator whether a process is safe or SOP is working.

TerminationTerminationThe event or events that stop the

accident or diminish it in size.

Example:Consumption of combustible materials in process, fire extinguisher.

More example: refer to Table 1.7, Page 19 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)