erly saleng
-
Upload
rhaineblue-saleng -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of erly saleng
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
1/84
IRRIGATION PROTOCOL OF GRAPES IN NORTHEN ISRAEL, IRRIGATION HANDLING SYSTEM
(Irrigation survey in northern Israel)
Agrostudies 2011-2012
DEPARTMENT OF
NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, NORAGRIC
MASTER THESIS 30 CREDITS 2006
Challenges and Possibilities of Drip and Canal Irrigation in
Northern Sudan
Osman Ali Osman ELmakkiCHALLENGES AND POSSIBILITIES OF DRIP AND CANAL IRRIGATION IN
NORTHERN SUDAN
BY
OSMAN ALI OSMAN ELMAKKI
THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR
THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AT THE NORWEGIAN
UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES.
May, 2006 ii
The Department of the international Environment and Development studies, Noragric, is the
international gateway for the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB). Eight Department,
associated research institute and Norwegian college of Veterinary Medicine in Oslo. Established
in 1986, Noragrics contribution to international development lies in the interface between
research, education (Bachelor, Master and PhD programmes) and assignments.
The Noragric Master Theses are the final theses submitted by students in order to fulfil the
requirements under the Noragric Master programme Management of Natural Resources and
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
2/84
Sustainable Agricultural (MNRSA) Development Studies and other Master programmes.
The findings in this thesis do not necessarily reflect the view of Noragric. Extracts from this
publication may not be reproduced after prior consultation with the author and on condition that
the resource is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation contact Noragric
Osman Ali Osman ELmakki, May 2006
Noragric
Department of International Environment and development Studies
P.O. Box 5003
N-1432 s
Norway
Tel: +47 64 96 52 00
Fax: +47 64 96 52 01
Internet http://www.umb.no/noragric iii
DECLARATION
I, Osman Ali Osman ELmakki, do hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and has
never been submitted for a degree at any other university. All the sources of the information have
been duly acknowledged.
Signature
Place..
Date iv
DEDICATION
To my great father Ali and wonderful mother Darelsalam
To my beloved wife Nada
To my sons Ahmed and Awab
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
3/84
To my daughter Aya
To my brothers & sister
I dedicate this thesis v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost I would like to record my appreciation and thanks to my supervisor Dr. Jens B.
Aune for his continuous follow up, guidance, support and valuable critique, that makes my on the
right track. I am also grateful to my local supervisor Dr. Ahmed Ali Salah for his time and
guidance in the field work. My deep thanks to Ingeborg and Lief, the wonderful librarians, for
their great search for references and books for my thesis.
I would like to thank NORAD for granting the scholarship and make my dream come true.
I am sincerely grateful to Dr. Kjersti Larsen at Oslo University and Grete Benjaminsen at Dry
Land Coordination Group (DCG) for their guidance and support from the very beginning.
I would like also to acknowledge my friends Hassan Guyo Roba, Ahmed Hussein, Bilijana
Kostovska, Geoffrey Gilpin, for their comments and assistances.
My heartily gratitude goes to Fadul Bashir, the director of Umjawasir project, ADRA/SUDAN,
for his logistic and moral supports. Deep thanks to Alex Murray the field coordinator for his
supervision of the drip trial during my stay in Uganda and also for his technical supports.
My incommensurately appreciation goes to Umjawasir project staff, Hyder Ashri, Ramson Duku,
Kabashi Mahmoud, Sadiq Sharif, Adam Yahiya, Musa Mohammed, Musa Abdallah, Hyder
Hussen, Jouis Ayoub, Eptihag Fathelaleem, Sara Kamal, Sulafa Mohammed, Majda Sirelkhatim,
Hawa Fadlalah, Hassan Fadilelnabi and Ismayel Elbalol for their cooperation and assistance. My
deeps thank goes to the Hawaweer community at Umjawasir for their cooperation and
participation. My heartily gratitude goes to my Parents, my wife and my kids for their support,
encouragement, and patient during my stay in Norway and in the field work.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
4/84
Osman Ali Osman ELmakki
UMB, s, Norway
May, 2006 vi
Abstract
Canal irrigation is the corner stone for agricultural activities in Northern Sudan. Irrigation has
traditionally depended on the Nile water or, in areas where there is no access to Nile water,
cultivations depended on underground water.
Several mechanical and biological problems are encountered in canal irrigation. These problems
make canal irrigation costly. Drip irrigation is considered as a possible solution to the
challenges facing canal irrigation.
This study aims to identify the challenges facing canal and drip irrigation in Northern Sudan and
to assess these possibilities for sustainable irrigation, with respect to the future benefits when
growing date palms.
Data was gathered from both canal and drip irrigation projects in Northern Sudan. A drip
irrigation trial was completed at the Umjawasir project. Prices of vegetables were gathered over
a six month period from the Khartoum market. Agricultural inputs and dripping kit prices were
gathered from markets. Data concerning date palms was collected in relation to canal and drip
irrigation.
The investment cost for 1ha of date palm in drip irrigation was US$12,068, while US$2,338 for
the canal irrigation. The NPV for drip irrigation for 1ha of date palm, was US$-7,140, while
US$4,168 for the canal irrigation with 10 % discount rate. The IRR for drip irrigation was 6 %
and for canal irrigation was 16 %. The profitability of date palm in drip irrigation could not
compete with date palm cultivation utilizing canal irrigation. For drip irrigation to compete
financially with canal irrigation, the investment cost should not exceed US$4,214
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
5/84
Several crops can be intercropped with date palm utilizing canal irrigation such as alfalfa, okra
and tomato. Intercropping date palm with other crops is difficult in drip irrigation. Drip can be
the only way to irrigate land that is not possible to irrigate with canal irrigation.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION ...........................................................................................................................III
DEDICATION ...............................................................................................................................IV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..............................................................................................................V
ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................VI
LIST OF TABLES ..........................................................................................................................X
LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................XI
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... XII
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
1.1 BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................1
1.2 RESEARCH PROBLEM AND JUSTIFICATION ................................................................2
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................2
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW........................................................................................3
2.1 AVAILABILITY OF WATER FOR IRRIGATION ..............................................................3
2.2 CANAL IRRIGATION ..........................................................................................................3
2.3 DRIP IRRIGATION...............................................................................................................4
2.3.1 Concepts ..........................................................................................................................4
2.3.2 Global trend ....................................................................................................................6
2.3.3 Economical effects...........................................................................................................6
2.3.4 Ecological impact............................................................................................................7
2.3.5 Limitation of drip irrigation............................................................................................8
2.4 DATE PALM..........................................................................................................................8
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
6/84
2.4.1 Date palm irrigation........................................................................................................9
2.4.2 The economic of date palm production .........................................................................10
2.4.3 Dates marketing problem..............................................................................................10
CHAPTER III: MATERIAL AND METHODS............................................................................11
3.1 SELECTION OF THE STUDY AREA ................................................................................11
viii
3.2 BACK GROUND OF THE STUDY AREA.........................................................................11
3.2.1 Soil.................................................................................................................................13
3.2.2 Irrigation .......................................................................................................................14
3.2.3 Climate ..........................................................................................................................14
3.2.4 Agricultural activities....................................................................................................15
3.3 DATA COLLECTION .........................................................................................................16
3.3.1 Primary data .................................................................................................................16
3.3.2 Secondary data..............................................................................................................18
3.4 DATA ANALYSIS ..............................................................................................................18
3.4.1 Primary data .................................................................................................................18
3.4.2 Secondary data..............................................................................................................19
CHAPTER IV: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION...........................................................................21
4.1 CANAL IRRIGATION ........................................................................................................21
4.1.1 Farming system .............................................................................................................21
4.1.2 Problems of canal irrigation .........................................................................................22
4.1.3 Labour use.....................................................................................................................25
4.1.4 Comparison between cemented and traditional............................................................26
4.1.5 Intercropping in canal irrigation ..................................................................................27
4.2 DRIP IRRIGATION.............................................................................................................29
4.2.1 Overview of drip irrigation system................................................................................29
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
7/84
4.2.2 Crops grown in drip irrigation......................................................................................30
4.2.3 Labour use.....................................................................................................................31
4.2.4 Drip irrigation trials in Umjawasir ..............................................................................33
4.2.5 Lessons learned from drip irrigation trials...................................................................35
4.2.6 Economics of drip and canal irrigation ........................................................................37
4.2.7 Date palm life cycle.......................................................................................................38
4.2.8 Future benefits...............................................................................................................40
4.2.9 Date palm net income....................................................................................................43
4.3 ECONOMICAL SUSTAINABILITY OF DRIP IRRIGATION..........................................45
4.4 COMPARISON BETWEEN DRIP AND CANAL IRRIGATION......................................46
4.5 DRIP IRRIGATION TRENDS ............................................................................................48
ix
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION......................................................................................................49
REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................50
APPENDIXES ...............................................................................................................................57
APPENDIX 1: AGRICULTURAL INPUTS PRICES FOR CANAL AND DRIPPING KITS............................57
APPENDIX 2: VEGETABLE PRICES AT KHARTOUM MARKETS........................................................57
APPENDIX 3: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FARMERS USING DRIP IRRIGATION.........................................58
APPENDIX 4: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FARMERS USING CANAL IRRIGATION ....................................61
APPENDIX 5: FORM FOR DATA COLLECTION IN THE EXPERIMENTAL AREA...................................63
APPENDIX 6: GENERAL OBSERVATION GUIDE LINE......................................................................64
APPENDIX 7: FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION .....................................................................................64
APPENDIX 9: VEGETABLE PRICES IN US$/ WEEK IN KHARTOUM MARKET....................................65
APPENDIX 10: FAOSTAT DATA BASE FOR DATE PALM IN SUDAN ..............................................65
x
LIST OF TABLES
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
8/84
TABLE 1: APPROXIMATE LENGTH / M FOR CEMENTED AND TRADITIONAL CANAL .......................14
TABLE 2: METHODOLOGY FOR DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS.............................................20
TABLE 3: CROP PROFITABILITY FOR YEAR 2004 AT UMJAWASIR PROJECT ..................................22
TABLE 4: NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS OBSERVING DIFFERENT PROBLEMS IN CANAL PERFORMANCE22
TABLE 5: FARMERS HIRE LABOUR AND SELF DEPENDANT IN RELATION TO CANAL PERFORMANCE25
TABLE 6: COMPARISON BETWEEN CEMENTED CANALS AND TRADITIONAL CANALS....................26
TABLE 7: INTERCROPPING CONTRIBUTION TO DATE PALM ..........................................................27
TABLE 8: AVERAGE PRODUCTION COST FOR DIFFERENT CROPS...................................................28
TABLE 9: OVERVIEW OF DRIP IRRIGATION PROJECTS IN NORTH SUDAN......................................29
TABLE 10: OPINION AMONG RESPONDENTS ON DRIP IRRIGATION ...............................................30
TABLE 11: INITIAL COST FOR THE TWO DRIP IRRIGATION TRIAL FOR 250 M
2
EACH......................33
TABLE 12: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TWO DRIP IRRIGATION TRIALS AT UMJAWASIR .............34
TABLE 13: INVESTMENT COST OF 1HA OF DATE PALM IN DRIP AND CANAL IRRIGATION .............37
TABLE 14: PRODUCTION OF DATE PALM IN CANAL IRRIGATION..................................................39
TABLE 15: DATE PALM PRODUCTION IN DRIP IRRIGATION...........................................................39
TABLE 16: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR DATE PALM PRODUCTION IN DRIP IRRIGATION...............41
TABLE 17: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR DATE PALM PRODUCTION IN CANAL IRRIGATION ...........42
TABLE 18: ECONOMICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN DRIP AND CANAL IRRIGATION........................45
TABLE 19: COMPARISON BETWEEN DRIP IRRIGATION AND CANAL IRRIGATION ..........................46
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: UMJAWASIR PROJECT LOCATION................................................................................12
FIGURE 2: UMJAWASIR PROJECT LAYOUT...................................................................................13
FIGURE 3: MAXIMUM & MINIMUM TEMPERATURE IN
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
9/84
0
C ...........................................................15
FIGURE 4: MAP OF SUDAN SHOWS LOCATION OF DRIP IRRIGATION PROJECTS.............................17
FIGURE 5: TRADITIONAL IRRIGATION FIGURE (A) AND CEMENTED CANAL FIGURE (B) ................24
FIGURE 6: CANAL PROBLEMS AT UMJAWASIR PROJECT IN FIGURE (C) AND (D)...........................24
FIGURE 7: LABOUR TASK OF DRIP IRRIGATION PROJECTS ............................................................32
FIGURE 8: THE TWO DRIP IRRIGATION TRIALS AT UMJAWASIR PROJECT IN FIGURE (A) AND (B)..35
FIGURE 9: OKRA GERMINATION IN THE 2
ND
DRIP IRRIGATION TRIAL ...........................................36
FIGURE 10: DATE PALM FRUITS...................................................................................................43
FIGURE 11: NET INCOME FOR 1HA OF DATE FRUITS IN DRIP AND CANAL IRRIGATION IN 30 YEAR44
xii
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ADRA/SUDAN Adventist Development and Relief Agency/ Sudan
Acre Area Unit, of 4,840 square yards
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistic
database.
Feddan Area unit of 4,200 square meter.
ha Hectare; area unit of 10,000 square meter.
IRR Internal Rate of Return
NORAD Norwegian Agency for development Cooperation
NGOs Non Governmental Organizations
NPV Net Present Value
N. State. Northern State.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
10/84
SDR Social discount rate
SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences
yr Year
0
C Degrees Celsius 1
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Irrigation plays a significant role in the agricultural production in Sudan. The total area irrigated by
canal in Sudan is two million ha out of seven million ha (Abdel Rahman 1990). The performance
of canal irrigation in Sudan was not satisfactory, due to the deterioration in the canal
infrastructures, which leads to decline in the total production (Guvele et al. 2001). Drip irrigation
was introduced to Sudan 5-6 years ago, in small areas, to solve problems related to canal irrigation.
The efforts to initiate the dripping projects were being individuals. In Northern Sudan at
Umjawasir project, which is an agricultural project run by ADRA/SUDAN
1
, where certain
problems have been encountered with the canal irrigation such as; cracks, weed problems and sand
burying the canals.
Labour demand was high in canal maintenance, while in drip irrigation a skilled labourer was
needed for the maintenance and operation.
Drip irrigation offers an extensive range of solutions to the problems that were encountered for
canals irrigation. Private companies and NGOs started to introduce drip irrigation in Northern
Sudan to protect big investments in the desert, such as oil pipelines, highway roads and agricultural
scheme.
The initial cost for drip irrigation is higher than canal irrigation. This is due to the high cost of
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
11/84
equipment and installation.
Date palm cultivation is the most profitable crop in North Sudan. Date palm is extensively grown
near the Nile. Several crops are intercropped with date palms in canal irrigation. Alfalfa, okra and
tomato increase the profitability of date palm cultivation when intercropped.
Date palm cultivation in North Sudan has been prolonged for more than 3,000 year with the
utilization of canal irrigation. While the cultivation of date palm using drip irrigation was not
known as it was initiated only 5-6 years ago. The future benefit of date palm cultivation using
canal irrigation was positive, however, concerning drip irrigation, certain factors determine the
future benefits e.g. the social discount rate, market prices for date fruits and equipments prices.
Research was proposed to; identify the challenges that are facing the canal and drip irrigation in
North Sudan, and to identify the future possibilities concerning a sustainable irrigation use.
1
ADRA/SUDAN refers to Adventist Development & Relief Agency/ SUDAN. Is a humanitarian,
International,
development and non government organization. 2
1.2 RESEARCH PROBLEM AND JUSTIFICATION
Canal irrigation in North Sudan has played an economical role in keeping the date palm cultivation
and different crop production sustainable for such a long time. Several problems were encountered
concerning the performance of canal irrigation. In the Umjawasir project, problems involving the
canal started with the establishment of the irrigation system at the site. The canals at the Umjawasir
project was not properly functioning due to the problems encountered such as cracks in the canal,
excessive weed growth in the canal and sand filling the canal from sandstorm.
Private companies and NGOs established several projects which are irrigated by drip irrigation.
These companies and NGOs were satisfied with performance of the drip irrigation. The economical
future benefit for the drip irrigation project was not considered when establishing these projects.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
12/84
Drip irrigation provides a solution to most of the problems faced with canal irrigation. Advantages
and disadvantages of drip and canal irrigation were studied which would facilitate a clear
assessment of economical future benefits.
This research is aimed at clarifying challenges and possibilities of canal and drip irrigation in
North Sudan. Date palms cultivation was chosen in this study for it is historical, social and
economical value for the communities of Northern Sudan. The entire drip irrigation projects in
Northern Sudan have the same ecological features as at the Umjawasir project. The common
problems involved with canal irrigation in Northern Sudan are presented at the Umjawasir project.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1. To identify the advantages and disadvantages of canal and drip irrigation in Northern
Sudan.
2. To assess the profitability of canal and drip irrigation when growing date palm in Northern
Sudan.
3. To assess the future benefit of date palm cultivation using canal and drip irrigation in
Northern Sudan. 3
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 AVAILABILITY OF WATER FOR IRRIGATION
According to the 1959 Nile agreement, Sudans share of water was set at 18.5 billion cubic meters
per year (Jobin 1999). Sudan has therefore exhausted their share of the Nile water agreement,
consequently through expanding in agriculture scheme, thus a new strategies concerning the
irrigation policies is required.
Sudan has different water resources for irrigation. The White Nile, the Blue Nile and the river Nile
are considered the back bone for irrigation in Sudan. (Abdel Rahman 1990).
In the areas where there is no access to River Nile or its tributaries, 75 % of the population depend
on groundwater and rainwater for their domestic water use (Ayoub 1997). With the current
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
13/84
consumption of water in Sudan, there are signs of a water shortage (Abdel Rahman 1990) and
(Guvele et al. 2001).
In Sudan, underground water has come to attention due to low rainfalls in arid and semi arid areas
coupled with difficult access to the Niles water in areas with high populations (Farah et al. 1997b).
The northern Part of the Sudan is an arid and semi arid area of low rain fall. However, where there
is no access to river Nile water, the main water sources is from the Nubian sandstone aquifer
(underground water), which is capable of providing about 1.26 X 10
13
m
3
y
-1
(Farah et al 1997a).
The hydrological system in northern Sudan consists of two aquifers; the upper and the lower
aquifer. The lower aquifer is more suitable for domestic and agricultural uses than the upper one
(Farah et al. 1997a).
In northern Sudan, agricultural activities are concentrating along the Nile bank in a very small strip
of land. The cultivation of date palms is the main sources of income, along with cereal crops
(Reyad et al. 1997).
2.2 CANAL IRRIGATION
In many developed countries, irrigation plays a very important role in crop production.
Governments are spending millions of dollars each year in order to maintain and rehabilitate the
canal systems to meet their agricultural production requirements (Ghezae 1998).
4
Sudan has three agricultural sectors: irrigated, mechanized rain-fed and traditional rain- fed
(Guvele et al. 2001). However, two million ha are irrigated by canal out of the total seven million
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
14/84
ha which are traditional /mechanize rain-fed (Abdel Rahman 1990). Intensive canal irrigation is
becoming a major cornerstone for agricultural activities (Jobin 1999). The government of the
Sudan, through expansion in canal irrigation, leads to severe implication of water use. The
performance of large scale projects in Sudan has been recognized as disappointing at the best
(Guvele et al. 2001). The International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and the Gezira board
carried out research on water management practices on selected areas in the Gezira scheme. The
performance of all lower level canals was poor due to the physical deterioration of the structure of
the canals (Merry 1997). The high costs of canal irrigation and the low crop prices have made the
investment in new irrigation schemes increasingly unappealing (Postel 1999). In addition, farmers
irrigation performance has lead to a reduction in crop yield in certain parts of Sudan. A study was
done at the Gezira research station and it was found that a reduction in sorghum yield was related
to water mismanagement (Farah et al. 1997a).
An important mistake in many early irrigation systems has been the attempt to justify investing in
an expensive reservoir and irrigation site by proposing multiple crops and high intensities of
irrigation (Jobin 1999, p.14)
If such proposal was made in areas with poor drainage and where farmers have no experiences on
intensive irrigation, the proposal would be rejected. Traditional irrigation systems are the opposite
of the intensive irrigation, and have existed for generations (Jobin 1999).
2.3 DRIP IRRIGATION
2.3.1 Concepts
Drip irrigation is defined as a method of irrigation where the water is directed to the plants zone
(Suryawanshi 1995). Drip irrigation, refers to as trickle or low-flow irrigation to provide near
optimal soil moisture as a continuous basis while conserving water (Smith 1997) p 89. Drip
irrigation is categorized as micro-irrigation (MI), where water is irrigated according to the plant
water requirement (Phene 1995a; Suryawanshi 1995). 5
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
15/84
There are two types of drip irrigation; surface and subsurface drip irrigation. The subsurface type
uses a buried emitter which has the potential to save irrigation water by reducing the amount of
water added to the plant (Evett et al. 1995).
Both surface and subsurface drip irrigation use the same mechanism for delivering water to each
individual plant.
Drip irrigation is different than sprinkling irrigation. Sprinkling irrigation is the emission of water
through the air with a predictable pattern and radius (Smith 1997). Sprinkling irrigation is widely
used for the irrigation and freezing protection of young citrus trees in the USA (Davies 1995).
The main features of drip irrigation are; the deep percolation of water into the soil, negligible sign
of water losses due to evaporation and no surface water run off (Postel et al 2001).
Drip irrigation has been used for the cultivation of valuable trees (Smith 1997). One of the
overlying benefits of drip irrigation, is that can secure food, even during periods of drought
(Chigerwe et al. 2004). The adoption of drip irrigation began in areas that have traditionally
suffered from water shortages (Srivastava et al. 1998).
Due to the high investment cost, drip irrigation is most commonly used by wealthy farmers. (Postel
1999). In recent years, new drip irrigation technology has been developed, for home garden
cultivation. A bucket, a few meters of tubes and nozzles, is all that is needed to grow vegetables for
home consumption. The bucket can be filled manually, from a nearby water source (Sahin et al
2005).
The application of water, in drip irrigation, can be precisely controlled, when compared to furrow
and sprinkling irrigation. These advantages can increase yield and revenue, and decrease overall
cultivation costs when compared to the other irrigation methods (Hanson et al. 2006).
Drip irrigation is often chosen over other irrigation methods. The advantages of drip irrigation are
water application efficiency and reducing the water losses. In addition, drip irrigation offer very
low surface evaporation and deep percolation (Rajput et al 2006).
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
16/84
The unique feature of drip irrigation is the ability to apply small and frequent amount of fertilizer
and the potential for applying it uniformly to minimize the loss of soluble nutrients (Phene 1995a)
6
2.3.2 Global trend
The tendency in recent years has been to shift from surface irrigation to drip irrigation. World wide
in year 2000, three million hectares were cultivated using micro irrigation. This represents 2 % of
the total irrigated land in the world (Ayars et al. 1999). Drip irrigation is recognized to be a more
efficient water delivery system, along with its ecological advantages (Sezen et al 2006). Drip
irrigation has become more favourable due to it is advantages which appear in the production,
fertilizer application, the control of water application, as well as the deep percolation (Postel et al.
2001; Ayars et al. 1999).
Countries which have adopted drip irrigation technology are either suffering of problems of water
scarcity, or poor quality water (Srivastava et al 1998). China is an example of a country with water
shortages. The government is encouraging farmers to adopt drip irrigation, (Wang et al. 2006).
Several studies have shown that, the area under drip irrigation is increasing. The spread of drip
technologies are gaining momentum, e.g. India reported more than 70,000 ha under drip irrigation,
which account for 3.97 % of the total area irrigated by drip irrigation systems world wide
(Srivastava et al 1998).
.
One reason why people are moving towards drip irrigation is the increasing awareness that water
resources are finite and perhaps are even declining (Phene 1995a). Drip irrigation can save up to
50-75 % of the irrigation water when compared to canal irrigation. Easily control of the water
application in drip irrigation, along with reduced weeds growth, easy fertilizer application has led
to increases the yield from 30-100 % (ELawadi 1999; Suryawanshi 1995)
For the areas with a narrow and irregular landscape, drip irrigation offers a wide range of solutions
to maximize the land use without runoff. These being easy delivery of fertilizers and maximum
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
17/84
control of the irrigation water (Bressan 1995).
2.3.3 Economical effects
The investment decision for shifting to drip irrigation depends upon many factors; including cost
of cultivation, productivity, yield gain factor, cost of producing electricity prices, depth of
groundwater and irrigation requirement. These parameters vary from crop to crop, place to place,
size of plot, and farmer to farmer.(Sirvastava et al 2003, p.79)
7
Drip irrigation is now available to all, but it is too expensive and sophisticated for small farmers to
adopt (Postel et al 2001). In order for drip irrigation to become more profitable than other irrigation
methods, the costs of watering along with agricultural input must be less than the total income
(Hanson et al. 2006).
Ecological and geographical criteria determine the cost and benefits concerning the investment in a
drip irrigation system (Sezen et al. 2005).
A model for investment decision for drip irrigation system was made by Indian scientists. The
model is generated using computer software; all concerns the installation of a drip irrigation
system, crop selection, as well as crop diversification. The model is suitable for both canal and drip
irrigation with respect to those factors which determine decisions concerning which crops is
grown. The model utilizes a wide range of mathematical and economical equations to enhance the
decision concerning the possibilities of using drip irrigation (Sirvastava et al 2003).
A cost benefit analysis at the farm level was made, for converting olive grown using surface
irrigation to drip irrigation. The net present value (NPV) was used in this analysis. The NPV was
positive for drip irrigation, given the high prices paid for the olives at the market (Cetin et al.
2004).
An economic analysis was done to compare drip irrigation and a pivot sprinkling system in
Western Kansas, USA, on a Corn field. The surface drip irrigated more area and generated a
greater return than did the centre pivot sprinkler system, (Dhuyvette et al. 1995).
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
18/84
A field study was done in California, USA, to compare furrow, surface drip, and sub-surface drip
irrigation on Lettuce yield. The drip irrigations profitability was uncertain and the revenue did not
increase by converting from furrow to drip irrigation (Hanson et al. 1997).
2.3.4 Ecological impact
Management of agro-chemical for crop was one of the environmental issues identified during the
design of the Rahad project in Sudan, which use a canal for irrigation, where intensive and
extensive use of insecticides, herbicides, defoliants, fungicides and rodenticides. The use of these
agro-chemicals had a negative effects on human and animals in the area (Ghezae 1998)
In Sudan malaria, diarrhoea, and schistomiasis are diseases associated with canal irrigation in the
agricultural communities along the Blue Nile River, and this is due to water logging, (Ghezae
1998; Jobin 1999). 8
By using drip irrigation, it reduces the negative impacts related to canal irrigation, such as water
born diseases and excessive use of agro-chemical. Agricultural research showed that drip irrigation
provided enough soil moisture and a significant affects on the yield, without using large amount of
fertilizer and pesticides (Smith 1997; Sezen et al 2006).
Researchers summarize the advantages of the drip irrigation as; drip save water up to 50-75 %,
yield increase up to 30-100 %, while fertilizers can be saved up to 25- 30 % and reduces the weed
growth (Suryawanshi 1995; Zaid 1999). Drip irrigation is also reducing the incidence of crop
diseases, by creating unsuitable habitat for insects to regenerate, through low humidity (Skaggs
2001).
2.3.5 Limitation of drip irrigation
In spite of the numerous advantages of drip irrigation, it has a number of limitations that varies
from place to another.
Drip irrigation system is identified as high investment cost (US$1000 to US$ 3000 per acre). It
requires a big investment capital and a high skilled labour (Barth 1995; Skaggs 2001).
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
19/84
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
20/84
about 81.4 % from the total date palm area in Sudan. The numbers of date palm trees in Sudan are
about 8 million in 1996, which produces about 240 thousand tons of date fruits (Reyad et al. 1997).
2.4.1 Date palm irrigation
Different methods where used to irrigate date palms, at different water requirement even within the
same country (Liebenberg et al. 1999). The oldest methods are flood irrigation, and furrow basin
irrigation. Furrow basin is a redesign of flood irrigation (Liebenberg et al. 1999).
Flood irrigation method has several advantages. It has low operational cost and easy to apply. The
disadvantages of the flood irrigation are high labour requirements, difficult to achieve a high
efficiency rate and it is not suited for sandy soil (Liebenberg et al. 1999). Drip irrigation is the
latest methods used for date palm irrigation. The control of water in drip irrigation is easy to
schedule and manage. The topography is not a limitation for drip irrigation, as it is not influence by
a wind or dust storm and its not labour intensive (Liebenberg et al. 1999). In summer season the
water requirement through flood irrigation for date palm are almost double the amounts of water
needed in winter season, which constitutes
1
/3 of the annual water consumption (Liebenberg et al.
1999). 10
2.4.2 The economic of date palm production
In the Northern and river Nile state date palm is intercropped with wheat, broad beans and fodder.
It is difficult to calculate the cost of each crop in this intercropping system. In Sudan, statistical
data showed that the cost of production of 1 ha of date palm range between US$114 in 1992 to
US$ 130 in 1995 (Reyad et al. 1997).
A study of the date palm cultivation in the North Sudan found that; in 1995 the cost of production
of 1 ha of date palm intercropped with different crop is higher in the Northern state than in the
River Nile state. In the Northern state the cost was US$ 286, and US$ 232 in the River Nile state.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
21/84
Therefore the agricultural input transportation cost to the Northern state is higher than the River
Nile state (Reyad et al. 1997).
2.4.3 Dates marketing problem
The marketing problems of the date fruits in Sudan were summarised in four main points by
(Reyad et al. 1997)
1- The date fruits are packed in traditional bags known as shawal which is susceptible to pests,
and that lead to low price.
2- The storage of date fruits is in traditional rooms built by mud which is suitable for pests to
regenerate.
3- Transportation means is not designed for date fruits or any other crop.
4- Dry varieties of date fruits is produced in Sudan, which has low prices in the international
market. 11
CHAPTER III: MATERIAL AND METHODS
3.1 SELECTION OF THE STUDY AREA
In order to carry out the study on drip and canal irrigation system, three states were selected;
Northern, River Nile, and Khartoum states. River Nile and Northern states were selected both for
the location of the drip irrigation projects. Six drip irrigation projects were recognized for data
gathering; two in the River Nile and four in the Northern state.
Khartoum was selected in order to gather information from market, government offices and
research institutes.
The Umjawasir agricultural project was selected as the main study area for collecting the canal
irrigation data, along with a drip irrigation trial.
3.2 BACK GROUND OF THE STUDY AREA
The Umjawasir area is located approximately 200 km North West of Khartoum city in the Bayoda
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
22/84
desert of Northern Sudan along the wadi ELmugaddam
2
, (figure 1). The Hawaweer tribe are the
inhabitants of Umjawasir, and have secured their livelihood mainly through pastoralism (Larsen et
al. 2001). In the early 1980s, drought and famine hit the Umjawasir area as well as other places in
the Sahel region. The Hawaweer lost most of their livestock and some of them migrated to other
places in the northern state and the Khartoum state (Larsen et al. 2001). ADRA/SUDAN started the
agricultural project in Umjawasir to ensure food security for the Hawaweer people and to
rehabilitate the environment that had been affected by the drought.
2
Wadi ELmugaddam is a dry tributary of the river Nile stretching from Kordofan in Western Sudan and
join the River
Nile in Korti in Northern Sudan. (Larsen et al. 2001) 12
Figure 1: Umjawasir project location
Source: Google Earth.
The Umjawasir agricultural project started in 1991 with a pilot phase (phase zero) (figure 2). The
main objective was to discover the possibilities of growing different crops. The project started with
four bore holes using turbine pumps and a diesel engine to irrigate an area of 38 ha. In the first
agricultural season on 1991 different crops were grown, and it was reported as a success.
The first phase (phase 1) started in 1995 with 6 bore holes to irrigate 130 ha. The direct
beneficiaries were 72 families, each with 1.68 ha. The objective of phase 1 was to insure food
security in the area and to rehabilitate the environment.
Phase 2 started in 2000 and 151 ha was brought under irrigation. Direct beneficiaries were 90
families who were involved in the agricultural activities. The land was irrigated from 6 bore holes.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
23/84
All the three phases were funded by NORAD and implemented by ADRA/SUDAN.
13
Figure 2: Umjawasir project layout
3.2.1 Soil
The soil in Umjawasir was deposited during the annual flood, which took place during various
geological periods. The soils depth is 180 cm, with a clay content between 48 -50% and a
yellowish brown colour in the top 70 cm and a dark yellowish-brown profile on the bottom
(Mustafa 2003)
Over all, the soils showed neither salinity nor alkalinity during the first growing season. Generally,
the soil of the area is good for agricultural purposes, but due to aridity, the organic matter content
is very low along with nitrogen deficiency (Mustafa 2003). The soil of some surface areas is salty;
however, this disappears by leaching to deeper zones in the first cultivation season. (Mustafa 2003)
14
3.2.2 Irrigation
The main source of water for irrigation in Umjawasir project is the underground water from the
Nubian sandstone aquifer. The project drilled four bore holes in phase zero (130-150 meters
depth), six bore holes in phase one, and another six bore holes in phase two (149 180 meters
depth).
Monitoring the underground water levels showed a negligible decline of a few meters during
operations. (Mustafa 2003) All of the 16 bore holes from the three phases, irrigate 330 ha in
Umjawasir. The irrigation area is distributed among 210 families.
Irrigation is done through canal net work stating from the bore hole to the farms site. Canal is
divided into two types, main canal, which is cemented and sub main canal, which is erected by soil
only. Table 1 summarize the total approximate length of each type of canal
Table 1: approximate length / m for cemented and traditional canal
Project # Cemented canal Traditional canal
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
24/84
Phase zero 00 01,360 m
Phase one 3,690 m 15,330 m
Phase two 4,200 m 18,900 m
Total 7,890 m 35,590 m
3.2.3 Climate
The temperature in Umjawasir varies between the average 27
0
C minimum to 45
0
C maximum
(figure 3). Low humidity and high evaporation are the general climatic features in the area. The
evaporation increases when the temperature increases.
The Annual rain fall is 50 mm/yr however; the area can flood in case of ample rain in the high land
of northern Kordofan.
The summer season extends from April to July, and winter is from October to March. The period
from August to September is considered the rainy season.
15
0
10
20
30
40
50
Sep-95
Nov-95
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
25/84
Jan-96
Mar-96
May-96
Jul-96
Sep-96
Nov-96
Jan-97
Mar-97
May-97
Jul-97
Month
0
C
Maximum C
Minimum C
Figure 3: Maximum & Minimum Temperature in
0
C
Source: Umjawasir project
3.2.4 Agricultural activities
Subsistence farming is the agricultural activity in the project area. Farmers grow different summer
and winter crops. The main crops grown in winter are wheat and broad beans along with alfalfa. In
the summer season sorghum grain, fodder and okra are grown.
Wheat is considered the main crop, and almost all inhabitants depend on it as their main source of
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
26/84
food. Broad beans in the recent years are grown for commercial purposes and some domestic
consumption. Many farmers in the project grow alfalfa to generate high incomes. Date palms are
also grown in the project area intercropped with alfalfa.
By growing date palms farmers secure a future for the succeeding generations, and can claim rights
to the land.
Limited crops are grown in the summer season and most of the inhabitants tend to grow Okra for
its high income. 16
Sorghum grain and sorghum fodder are grown in small areas on the farm. The operational costs of
growing sorghum are higher compared to wheat and broad beans. The reason for this is the intense
demand on irrigation, which demands more fuel and spare parts.
3.3 DATA COLLECTION
Primary and secondary data were collected through quantitative and qualitative methods. The
qualitative method, consists of semi structured and unstructured interview with close and open
ended question, as well as general observation for the study area and a focus group discussion with
the informants
The quantitative methods consist of the drip irrigation trial at Umjawasir project and questionnaire
survey.
A detailed description of how data was collected and analysed is presented in the following part.
3.3.1 Primary data
Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect primary data on both the irrigation
systems and market prices of vegetables and agriculture inputs.
In order to identify the advantages and disadvantages along with the labour use and the future
benefit of the canal irrigation, a qualitative method were used through semi structured and
unstructured interview
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
27/84
The interviews conducted in Umjawasir project included 39 farmers (31 male and 8 female) out of
50 farmers who were cultivating during the survey time. The selection was done randomly from a
list obtained from the project administration and a calculator was used to select randomly.
Focus group discussions were carried out with four groups, seven persons each. The groups were
purposefully selected from Umjawasir projects field office, to represent young, middle, old age
farmers, and labourers.
For the drip irrigation projects (figure 4), semi structured and unstructured interviews were
conducted with the manager/ owners of the farms, to identify the advantages and disadvantages,
also the labour use, as well as to identify the profitability and the future benefits. One drip
17
irrigation owner would name another drip irrigation project, such that in the end it turned out to be
snow ball sampling (Bryman 2001).
Figure 4: Map of Sudan shows location of drip irrigation projects
Qualitative methods were used to collect prices for six types of vegetables in Khartoum market
through structured interviews. The structured interview consist of a list of vegetable, agricultural
inputs and dripping kit to identify the prices
From a list of vegetable traders, a random sample of 20 traders was selected using a random
numbers.
Prices of agriculture input for both drip and canal irrigation were collected from companies and
drip irrigation dealers through a check list of specific items.
To test the effects of drip irrigation on Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), two trials were conducted
at two locations of Umjawasir project. The first trial was established on 250 m near the farms in
phase #2, with 520 plants per nozzle at spacing between plants of 50 cm and 80 cm between rows
18
(the plant spacing is according to the extension unit at Umjawasir project). Okra (Abelmoschus
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
28/84
esculentus) was selected, for its fast growth rate and high commercial value (Camciuc et al. 1996).
Water requirement for the trial was set at 3 lit per plant per day. Further adjustment of water
requirement was done during the trail. However, the trail had to be abandoned after three weeks
because of pump breakdown.
The second trial was conducted in phase # 0 of the project, which has more sand content. A water
tank was erected to ensure availability of water in case a pump breaks down. The trial was done
with the same equipment as in the first one, and the same plant spacing. The water requirement as
the first trial was applied to the second trial, beside the cultural practices (fertilizers, and
pesticides).
The second trial started in the 2
nd
week of October till the 3
rd
week of December. Few data were
gathered from the second trail due to animals invasion.
3.3.2 Secondary data
Secondary data were collected from Ministry of irrigation, Arab Organization for Agricultural
Development (AOAD), Forestry research institute, Shambat research institute and ADRA/
SUDAN.
Structured interview was used to identify the policies and strategies for irrigation in Northern
Sudan, along with the future plan for drip irrigation investment in Sudan.
Part of the reports on irrigation was collected from Arab Organization for Agricultural
Development (AOAD) also part of the date palm information was collected from the reports at
Shambat research institute in Khartoum state.
3.4 DATA ANALYSIS
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
29/84
3.4.1 Primary data
Descriptive analysis was used through cross tabulation from SPSS computer software to identify
different features for canal and drip irrigation such as the advantages and disadvantages, crop
grown per area, labour use, and to compare between traditional and cemented canal, as well as to
compare between canal and drip irrigation. 19
Simple calculation was used to identify the cost of production, total income in US$ and
profitability for each crop when intercropped with date palm
Net present Value (NPV) for 10 % Social Discount Rate (SDR) was calculated for the Dates fruit
production for one hectare for drip and canal irrigation, in order to identify the future benefits from
the standpoint of the present (Pearce et al. 1990). Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was calculated for
both systems when growing date palm. The investment in drip and canal irrigation that correspond
to the IRR was calculated by using goal seek function in the Excel program.
Part of the data that could fit into the statistical package was treated separately in different spread
sheet e.g. focus group discussion and the general observation.
3.4.2 Secondary data
Secondary data were used as a back ground to under stand the attribute of different irrigation
systems in Northern Sudan.
Information was gathered for date palm (phoenix dactylifera) for both canal and drip irrigation
systems. The reason was, all of the drip irrigation projects included in this study are growing date
palm, in addition to that dates is the main valuable crop grown in the Northern and Nile state
(Reyad et al. 1997)
Table 2 summarizes the methodology of data collection and analysis, for the study. The summery
tend to simplify the methodology and the purpose of the analysis.
20
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
30/84
Table 2: Methodology for data collection and analysis
Sites Methods for data
collection
Methods for analysis Purpose of the analysis
Canal irrigation Individuals
interview.
Focus group
discussion.
General observations
Descriptive statistic.
Net present value (NPV).
Internal rate of return (IRR)
To identify the advantages and disadvantages.
To assess the profitability of date palm when intercropped with
different crop and vegetable.
To identify labour role in irrigation management.
To discover future benefit of dates production.
Drip irrigation Individuals
interview
General observation
Descriptive statistic.
Net present value (NPV).
Internal rate of return (IRR)
To identify the advantages and disadvantages of drip irrigation.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
31/84
To assess profitability of date palm when irrigated by drip.
To identify labour role in irrigation management.
To compare between drip and canal irrigation in term of
profitability.
To discover future benefit of dates production.
Khartoum
Markets
Interview guide to
discover the prices of
vegetables,
agriculture inputs and
dripping kit
Mathematical calculation To discern the highest and lowest prices of vegetables.
To compare between the drip and canal inputs prices when
growing 1ha of date palm trees.
Drip irrigation
trial
Field trial Descriptive analysis To identify lesson learned from the trials.
21
CHAPTER IV: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 CANAL IRRIGATION
4.1.1 Farming system
In the Northern Sudan winter and summer are the principle cultivation seasons. Wheat, broad
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
32/84
beans, vegetables and alfalfa, are grown in winter. Sorghum grain, fodder and okra are grown in
summer season. Winter season extend from October to March and summer season is from April
to July.
In Umjawasir project wheat and broad bean are the main crops grown along with vegetables.
Wheat is considered as the main source of food, while broad bean is grown for commercial
purposes and for home use in case of surplus. Alfalfa is grown as animal fodder and it has a high
commercial value, (Table 3).
In the summer season, farmers tend to grow okra as a commercial crop (high generating income)
and for home consumption. Sorghum grain is grown in small areas due to the high operational
cost and the low income gained. Sorghum is grown as animal fodder and it has high prices in case
of low rainfall. The straw of sorghum is used in traditional house construction in Umjawasir for
the nomad communities.
Farmers in the summer season tend to grow few crops in small area of their farms due to the high
operational cost in summer, which require more fuel and spare parts.
Agricultural activities depend on the underground water from the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer. A
borehole was established for irrigation and the water is extracted by turbine pump. In the project
area there are 16 boreholes that can irrigate 330 hectares. Each family at Umjawasir is allotted
1.68 ha of irrigated land.
22
Table 3: crop profitability for year 2004 at Umjawasir project
Crop name Total income US$/ha Production cost US$/ha Profit US$/ha
Wheat 768 440 328
Broad beans 590 320 270
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
33/84
Alfalfa 2755 818 1,937
Okra 1,536 732 804
Sorghum grain 451 266 185
Sorghum fodder 360 182 178
Total 6,460 2,758 3,702
Source: Umjawasir project 2004
4.1.2 Problems of canal irrigation
Each borehole irrigates an area of 20-25 ha through canal network. In Umjawasir project there
are two types of canal, cemented and traditional canals. The cemented canals are constructed by
stones and cements, (Figure 5 a). Traditional canal is constructed by soil only, (Figure 5 b).
Three main problems are encountered within the canal irrigation. The most common problems
are the mechanical damages (cracks) in the canal, followed by sand filling the canal and the last
one is the excessive weeds interference in the canal. Table 4 shows how farmers respond to canal
problems.
Table 4: number of respondents observing different problems in canal performance
Problems
of cracks
Problems
of Weeds
Problems of Sand
filling the canal
Number of
respondents
33 17 14
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
34/84
23
The mechanical damages (crack) of the canal were observed by 33 farmers out of 39 farmers.
Cracks in the canal are due to the clay contents in the sand that mixed with the cement for
construction. Also the stones that is used for construction was not installed properly due to the
uneven shape.
Weed interference in the canal were observed by 17 farmers out of 39 farmers. The weeds
interference is related to crack in the canal. Water leakages in the canal through cracks lead to
weed growth in the canal.
Problems of sand filling the canal during sandstorm were observed by 14 farmers. Mainly the
canals in the Northern side of the project are exposed to sandstorm that blown in the winter
season, as well as the canals of the southern side is exposed to southern sandstorm in summer
season.
24
Figure a: Traditional canal Figure b: Cemented canal with cracks
Figure 5: Traditional irrigation figure (a) and cemented canal figure (b)
Figure c: sand filling the canal Figure d: weeds on canal side
Figure 6: Canal problems at Umjawasir project in figure (c) and (d)
25
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
35/84
4.1.3 Labour use
In canal irrigation system farmers hire labour for canal maintenance due to the long distances
between boreholes from farms. In order to identify the role of labourers in canal maintenance,
respondents were categorized into two groups; farmers hire labour and farmers who do not hire
labour (self dependant). Table 5 identify number of farmers who hires labour for canal
maintenance and farmers who are self dependent.
Table 5: Farmers hire labour and self dependant in relation to canal performance
Category Satisfied
with canal
performance
Not satisfied
with canal
performance
Total numbers
of
respondents
Farmers hire labour 9 12 21
Farmers do not hire labour ( self dependant) 18 0 18
From 39 respondents of Umjawasir project, 21 farmers were hiring labour, while 18 were not
hiring labour (self dependant).
The reason for dissatisfaction is the water loss in the cemented canals through cracks, which
needs labour force for continuous maintenance.
The nine framers agreed that with the current canal performance in the traditional canal that has
less water loss compare to the cemented canals and the maintenance could be done by soil only
while irrigation is taking place.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
36/84
Farmers that do not hire labour (self dependants) were using traditional canals that do not
necessary demand labour for maintenance.
26
4.1.4 Comparison between cemented and traditional
A comparison was made between cemented and traditional canal in order to identify the
advantages and disadvantages of each one.
Four main features were distinguished between cemented and traditional canal (Table 6). The
traditional canal has advantages of low cost of maintenance. The labour payment for canal
maintenance differs from one farmer to another. The payment is negotiable on area not on time
base. The maintenance of traditional canal can be done while irrigation is taking place.
In the cemented canals, a skilled labour is needed for maintenance, as cement and sand is needed
for the maintenance. After the handing over the project to the farmers committee they should
secure fund for cement for maintenance of the cemented canals.
Table 6: comparison between cemented canals and traditional canals
features Constructed canals Traditional canals
Cost of construction High Low
Water delivery Good if it is well built Satisfactory
Labour requirement More labour is needed if it is not
constructed properly
Less labour needed
Maintenance Should be done with cement and
stone ( Costly)
With soil only
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
37/84
Distances Short canal Long canal
Affordability Wealthy or better off farmer Normal farmers
27
4.1.5 Intercropping in canal irrigation
Different crops and vegetables are grown in Umjawasir in inter cropping systems. Therefore 70
% of farmers in Umjawasir project intercrop alfalfa with date palm. A market survey conducted
from July to December 2005 in Khartoum Markets, to identify prices of vegetables that can be
intercropped with date palm. Table 7 summarize the net profit of intercropping with date palm in
Umjawasir project, when the date palm average net income is US$1,056/yr.
Table 7: intercropping contribution to date palm
Crop/ 1ha Total average production/1ha/yr Total
average
income
(US$)/yr
Average
production
cost
(US$)/yr
Average
profit
(US$)/yr
Average
profit+
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
38/84
US$1,056
Alfalfa 11cuttingX210
hodXUS$1+US$342 (seeds sale)
2,851 822 2,029 3,085
Okra 45 kgX47 bag X US$0.73 1,551 986 565 1,621
Tomato 600kgXUS$3.5+600kgXUS$0.5 2,400 986 1,414 2,740
Cucumber 2000kgX US$0.60 1,200 986 214 1,270
Eggplant 1900kgX US$0.70 1,330 986 344 1,400
Intercropping of alfalfa with date palm increases the income of 1 ha up to US$ 3085/yr. Tomato
gained the second most profitable crop that increase the date palm hectare net income to
US$2,740. Okra is the third profitable crops when it is intercropped with dates in canal irrigation
which increases the income of 1 ha up to US$ 1621/yr.
In Umjawasir farmers distribute one hectare into 210 parts, each part is know as hod. The size
of hod is 42 m
2
where alfalfa is grown and it is used as a standard sale measure. The average
price ofone alfalfa hod is US$ 1 in addition alfalfa produces 111 kg of seeds which gains
additional income of US$ 432/yr.
28
The prices of alfalfa depend on the rainfall around the project. In case of no or little rainfall, the
prices of alfalfa would increase tremendously and vice versa.
The production cost of alfalfa is less than the production cost of okra, and this due to the
additional cost of transportation, taxetc. for okra, but for the alfalfa is sold locally (Table 8)
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
39/84
Table 8: average production cost for different crops
Items Alfalfa Okra Tomato Cucumber Eggplant
Cost
US$/ha
Cost
US$/ha
Cost
US$/ha
Cost
US$/ha
Cost
US$/ha
Tillage 39 39 39 39 39
Seeds 173 13 13 13 13
Fertilizers 24 48 48 48 48
Fuel 450 397 397 397 397
Labour 96 49 49 49 49
Lubricant & oil 20 20 20 20 20
Spare parts 20 20 20 20 20
Transportation, tax...etc 00 400 400 400 400
Total production cost 822 986 986 986 986
Total income 2,851 1,551 2,400 1,200 1,330
Profit 2,029 565 1,414 214 344
Vegetables can be grown only in winter season from October to March. Tomato under some
cases can be grown in the summer season if it has good shade from high trees like date palm or
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
40/84
citrus trees. Tomato gains the highest price in summer, which is US$ 3.5/kg and in winter US$
0.5/kg. Tomato growers started to make use of a certified seed that can be grown in summer.
Okra gains the second highest prices in the market survey and the prices decreases as winter
approach. In Umjawasir farmers, in order to gain high prices for okra they slice it into small
pieces and dry it under the shade. The dried okra can be cocked as food and it is very much
consumed in Umjawasir and Khartoum as well as the whole North region.
29
4.2 DRIP IRRIGATION
4.2.1 Overview of drip irrigation system
Drip irrigation projects in the Northern Sudan are established by private companies and NGOs.
These private companies are petrol oil companies, road construction companies and NGOs such
as ADRA/SUDAN.
The main reason that, oil companies established drip irrigation in Northern Sudan was to protect
the oil pipeline from sand drift when crossing the desert in the river Nile state. Road construction
companies were protecting parts of the highway road that link Khartoum with the Northern state
from sand drift by establishing drip irrigation projects.
ADRA/SUDAN established drip irrigation system for the green belts after facing difficulties in
irrigation by canals. ADRA/SUDAN protects the farms by establishing green belt from
eucalyptus and other trees. The green belt irrigated by canals along with additional extension of
trees irrigated by dripping system.
Table 9: overview of drip irrigation projects in North Sudan
Project Trees and crop grown
name
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
41/84
Location Area
/ha
Establishment
cost US$/ha
Year of
establishment
Dates palm
Eucalyptus
Acacia
Citrus
Vegetables
Elmerooj N. state 17 8000-13000 2002
Elmarwa N. state 17 8000-13000 2002
Tharwat N. state 17 8000-13000 2002
Umjawasir N. state 1.2 4000-6000 2005 X X
Oil company Nile state 20 5000-10000 2003 X X
Oil company Nile state 20 5000-10000 2003 X X
Grown
X Not grown.
30
4.2.2 Crops grown in drip irrigation
A field survey was conducted to identify different trees and crops that were grown in the drip
irrigation project in Northern Sudan. Table 9 shows the crops and trees that are grown in drip
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
42/84
irrigation projects.
Based on a field survey, eucalyptus are grown in all drip irrigation projects. Eucalyptus has been
grown as a wind break at the edge of the farm.
All the drip irrigation projects in Northern Sudan are located in remote desert areas, where
sandstorm is a common phenomenon. A need of wind break from eucalyptus is highly prioritized
to reduce the alarming rate of sandstorm in the project.
Date palm is grown in the six projects, as long term investment that can produce after several
years. None of these projects started to produce date fruits, still after 2-4 years. In the drip
irrigation projects, neither cereal crops nor vegetables were grown.
Based on a field survey undertaken in the six drip irrigation projects in the North Sudan, all the
projects respondents agreed that drip irrigation is not cheap.
Table 10: Opinion among respondents on drip irrigation
Project Cheap to
buy
More
efficient
Save
time
Less labour
use for
operation
and
maintenance
Dripping increases
the productive
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
43/84
Number of agreed
respondents
0 6 6 4 4
Number of disagreed
respondents
6 0 0 2 2
All projects respondents agreed that drip irrigation is more efficient than canal irrigation.
From table 10, it can be seen that respondents agreed that drip irrigation saves time compared to
canal irrigation. In canal irrigation, more time is needed for irrigation depending on the distance
between borehole and farm, as well as the capacity of the turbine pump and engine.
31
Four out of the six respondents from the drip irrigation projects agreed that drip irrigation require
less labour with high payment compare low payment in canal irrigation. The other two
respondents disagreed because number of labour needed depend on the project area.
Four respondents agreed that drip irrigation increases the productivity more than canal irrigation.
The reason is that the agricultural practices such as fertilizers and pesticides application, are done
to individual plant, whereas in canal irrigation, are done to whole area irrigated.
4.2.3 Labour use
In drip irrigation labourers are important for monitoring, operation and maintenance due to the
technical sophistication of the system (Figure 7).
Monitoring consists of follows up of the nozzles, engine and water pump performance. Each
nozzle irrigates one plant, and if several nozzles are not working properly that would lead to poor
growth or death of the plant.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
44/84
Maintenance consists of nozzles, valve, along with engine and water pump maintenance. A
skilled labour is needed for the daily maintenance due to the technicality of the system. There are
two types of maintenance, daily maintenance and yearly maintenance. The daily maintenance is a
regular maintenance such as nozzles cleaning, valveetc. The yearly maintenance is the
overhaul of the engine and pump where it consists of changing spare parts, in addition of
renewing the drip system if it is necessary.
Operation consists of engine and water pump operation to fill-in the water tank. In drip irrigation
projects the labour used for maintenance is also responsible for the operating the engine and
pump.
Mainly two labourers are hired for a project size of 16-20 ha for the three above tasks. One
labourer is responsible for operation and the other is for maintenance, while both of them are
responsible for monitoring.
32
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Hiring labour for
monitoring
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
45/84
Hiring labour for
maintenance
Hiring labour for
W.pump &
enegine
operation
Numbers of projects
Figure 7: labour task of drip irrigation projects
33
4.2.4 Drip irrigation trials in Umjawasir
Two trials were conducted at Umjawasir project, to test the performance of the dripping system
on Okra crop and to identify the initial cost for each trial and to get and overview for the cost, in
addition to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the dripping system.
Table 11: Initial cost for the two drip irrigation trial for 250 m
2
each
Items 1
st
trial Prices (US$) 2
nd
trial prices in (US$)
Dripping Kits 249 0
Fuel 60 40
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
46/84
Labour 100 180
Seeds 2 2
Assistance 87 87
Fertilizers 0.5 0.5
Total 478.5 329.5
Dripping kits was bought from Khartoum market, the prices was high due to small quantity
requested for the dripping kit. The same dripping kit of 1
st
trial was used in 2
nd
trial.
Fuel cost was high in the 1
st
trail due to pumping water directly into the dripping system; where
in the 2
nd
trial irrigation was done from a water tank
Labour cost in the 2
nd
trial was high due to mobilizing the equipment from the 1
st
trial site to the
2
nd
trial site, in addition to establishing the fence around the second trial beside the reinstallation
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
47/84
of the system.
34
A comparison was made between the two trials to identify the major differences between the two
dripping system. Table 12 summarizes the differences.
Table 12: comparison between the two drip irrigation trials at Umjawasir
1
st
trial 2
nd
trial
Crop Name Okra Okra
Total area 250 m
2
250 m
2
Fertilizers application 750 gram Urea 1500 gram urea
Amount of seed sown 0.22 kg 0.30 kg
Number of Nozzles 520 520
Plant spacing 50 cm X 80 cm 50 cm X 80 cm
Irrigation time 45-90 minutes/ irrigation 30-45 minutes/irrigation
Irrigation schedule daily daily
Amount of water 750-900 litre per irrigation 500-750 litre per irrigation
Duration of the trial 3 weeks 9 weeks
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
48/84
Seeds germination After 5 days from the first After 8 days from the first
irrigation irrigation
Growth percentages 85 % 80 %
Amount of fuel 3 litre per irrigation 0.5 litre per irrigation
Methods of water delivery Water pump Water tank
The major different was the growth percentages in the 1
st
trial was 85 %, while in the second trial
it was 80 %. The factor that determines the growth rate was the water application, as well as the
pest that attacked the plants.
Amount of fuel in the 2
nd
trial was less due to the use of water tank, while it is high in the 1
st
trial
due to the use of water pump directly to pump water in the system.
35
4.2.5 Lessons learned from drip irrigation trials
Drip irrigation trials showed that good water management reduces the running cost. Fertilizers
were applied in small quantity to individual plant which reduces part of the operational cost. In
drip irrigation fertilizers are placed after making small hole below the plant, whereby in canal
irrigation fertilizers were broadcast in the whole area. Irrigation directly from water pump is risky
in case of pump break. Nozzles need daily maintenance such as adjustment and cleaning from
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
49/84
rust and mud. Several dust storms occurred without affecting the performance of the drip
irrigation. The nozzles covered by sand remained working. Continues irrigation creates a suitable
environment for pest. In semi arid areas where the temperature is high, insects seek for a moisture
habitat to survive. A fence is essential for stopping animals from attacking the dripping site and
causing damages to the tubes and nozzles.
Figure a: 2
nd
drip irrigation trial installation Figure b: 1
st
drip irrigation trial
Figure 8: The two drip irrigation trials at Umjawasir project in figure (a) and (b)
36
Figure 9: Okra germination in the 2
nd
drip irrigation trial
Photo by: Jens B. Aune.
37
4.2.6 Economics of drip and canal irrigation
Based on the data collected from the market, prices for dripping kit, depends on quality and
country of origin. All the dripping kit was imported from different countries.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
50/84
Table 13 review the investment cost for drip and canal irrigation system for North Sudan.
Table 13: Investment cost of 1ha of date palm in drip and canal irrigation
Canal irrigation Drip irrigation
Item Quantity Cost
/US$
Quantity Cost
/US$
Drip irrigation
kit
0 0
kits and installation 8,000
Water tank 0 0 10,000 litre water tank 1,000
Canal
establishment
&
maintenance
Main canal and sub main
( manually )
200 0 0
Seedling 144seedlingX US$ 10 1,440 144seedling X US$ 10 1,440
Tillage Animal traction 25 By tractor 46
Fuel ( diesel) 48 lit X 24 irrig. X US$
0.32
369 7.35literXUS$0.32 X121
days ( irrigation every 3
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
51/84
days)
285
Spare parts&
maintenance
Fuel and oil filter etc. 22 Fuel and oil filter. .etc. +
nozzles, tube,
connectors
120
Fertilizers Urea+ organic fertilizer 10 10kg of urea X0.42 $ 4
Pesticides 25 25
Labour prices of hiring labour at
Umjawasir
75 1 labour X US$ 4.29 X
183day
875
transportation every 90 kg will be
transported by US$ 2.14
172 every 90 kg will be
transported by US$ 2.14
274
Total
Investment
Cost
2,338 12,069
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
52/84
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
53/84
Table 14: Production of date palm in canal irrigation
Life cycle Income status/ 1ha
Year 0 to year 4 Zero income
Year 5 to year 30 Income increases from 11kg/tree to 25 kg/tree
The first stage is from year 0 to year 4 where there is no production from dates. The second stage
is from year 5 to year 30 where farmers identified that the production of 1 ha is between 1500 kg
as minimum to 3500 kg as maximum for the improved variety.
Table 15: date palm production in drip irrigation
Drip irrigation Income status/ha Sources
Year 0 to year 4 Zero income
Year 5 to year 30 Income increases from 14 kg/tree
to 42 kg/tree.
Zaid and Botes (1999)
All drip irrigation projects included in this study did not start to produce date fruits. The
assumption was made for date palm production under drip irrigation, to be more than the
production of the date palm in canal irrigation.
Several authors indicated that the production of crops/trees in drip irrigation increases from 30-
100 %. (ELawadi 1999; Suryawanshi 1995).
Zaid and Botes (1999) calculated the cash flow for 5ha of date plantation, that the date palm
produces 50kg/palm.
40
4.2.8 Future benefits
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
54/84
The Net Present Value (NPV) for 10 % SDR, for date palm in drip irrigation resulted in US$ -
7,140. This showed a negative return for date palm under drip irrigation, (Table 16). The high
initial and running cost leads to a negative value of NPV beside other factors. The IRR was
found to be 6 % (NPV=0). The production assumption in drip irrigation is between 2,000 to
6,000 kg/yr for prices of US$ 1/ kg, while in canal irrigation is 1,500 to 3,500 kg/ha/yr for the
same price.
In canal irrigation the NPV for 10 % SDR, resulted in US$ 4,168, (Table 17) while the IRR was
16 %. In canal irrigation the IRR is higher than the interest rate which is 10 %. This indicated
that project is economically feasible.
The history of date palm cultivation in Northern region sustained more than 3,000 years under
canal (traditional) irrigation. If investment on canal irrigation was not profitable it would had not
sustain for that long time.
The investment in drip irrigation that correspond to an interest rate of % 16 as in canal irrigation,
was calculated by US$ 4,214 by using goal seek function in the Excel program. A % 65 decrease
in drip irrigation investment will make drip irrigation equally profitable as canal irrigation.
Date palm under drip irrigation is assumed to be more productive than in canal irrigation. The
reasons are; irrigation was directed to the root zone of individual plant, also the agricultural
practices was done properly due to the skilled labour.
41
Table 16: Sensitivity analysis for date palm production in drip irrigation
Drip irrigation
Year Production
kg/ha
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
55/84
Income US$ Investment
cost US$
Net income
US$
0 0 0 12069 -12069
1 0 0 1583 -1583
2 0 0 1583 -1583
3 0 0 1583 -1583
4 0 0 1583 -1583
5 2000 2000 1583 417
6 2000 2000 1800 200
7 2000 2000 1583 417
8 2000 2000 1583 417
9 2000 2000 1583 417
10 2000 2000 1583 417
11 3000 3000 1583 1417
12 3000 3000 1583 1417
13 3000 3000 1583 1417
14 3000 3000 1800 1200
15 4000 4000 1583 2417
16 4000 4000 1583 2417
17 4000 4000 1583 2417
18 4000 4000 1583 2417
19 4000 4000 1583 2417
20 5000 5000 1583 3417
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
56/84
21 5000 5000 1800 3200
22 5000 5000 1583 3417
23 5000 5000 1583 3417
24 5000 5000 1583 3417
25 6000 6000 1583 4417
26 6000 6000 1583 4417
27 6000 6000 1583 4417
28 6000 6000 1800 4200
29 6000 6000 1583 4417
30 6000 6000 1583 4417
NPV for 10 % SDR -$7,140.88
IRR 6%
42
Table 17: Sensitivity analysis for date palm production in canal irrigation
Canal irrigation
Year Production
kg/ha
Income US$ Investment
cost US$
Net income
US$
0 0 0 2338 -2338
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
57/84
1 0 0 638 -638
2 0 0 638 -638
3 0 0 638 -638
4 0 0 638 -638
5 1500 1500 638 862
6 1500 1500 700 800
7 1500 1500 638 862
8 1500 1500 638 862
9 1500 1500 638 862
10 2000 2000 638 1362
11 2000 2000 638 1362
12 2000 2000 638 1362
13 2000 2000 638 1362
14 2000 2000 700 1300
15 2500 2500 638 1862
16 2500 2500 638 1862
17 2500 2500 638 1862
18 2500 2500 638 1862
19 2500 2500 638 1862
20 3000 3000 638 2362
21 3000 3000 700 2300
22 3000 3000 638 2362
23 3000 3000 638 2362
24 3000 3000 638 2362
25 3500 3500 638 2862
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
58/84
26 3500 3500 638 2862
27 3500 3500 638 2862
28 3500 3500 700 2800
29 3500 3500 638 2862
30 3500 3500 638 2862
NPV for 10 % SDR $ 4,168.49
IRR 16%
43
Figure 10: date palm fruits
Photo by: Jens B. Aune
4.2.9 Date palm net income
The investment cost of drip is US$ 12,069. In year 5 the net income is US$ 417 exceeds the
operational cost. Drip irrigation gain more income as time goes on. In canal irrigation, the net
income starts to exceed the operational cost at year 5, where the net income is US$ 862. Canal
irrigation net income is higher in year 5 due to the high investment (operational) cost for drip
irrigation.
44
-14000
-12000
-10000
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
59/84
-8000
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Year
Income in US$
net income US$ for drip
net income US$ for canal
Figure 11: Net income for 1ha of date fruits in drip and canal irrigation in 30 year
In canal irrigation the net income is between US$862 in year 5 to US$2,862 in year 30, while in
drip irrigation is US$417 in year 5 to US$ 4,417. This net income depends on the prices of the
date fruits, which varies from variety to another.
From Figure 11 despite the high production per kg for drip irrigation between years 5 to 13 the
net income for drip irrigation did not exceed the investment cost. This is due to the high
operational cost in this year which did not contest with the production.
45
4.3 ECONOMICAL SUSTAINABILITY OF DRIP IRRIGATION
It is important to asses the economical sustainability of the canal and drip irrigation. The age of
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
60/84
the canal irrigation specifically for the date palm is more than 3,000 years, while drip irrigation
started in Sudan 5-6 years ago.
Date palm under drip irrigation produces after 5 years with an operational cost of US$ 1,583/yr,
while in canal it is US$638/year. (Table18).
With the current investment cost, date palm under drip irrigation would secure the future benefit
if the production increases more than 6,000 kg/ yr/ha.
If the social discount rate is decreased then the future benefit would be secured for the date palm
investment under drip irrigation.
Table 18: Economical comparison between drip and canal irrigation
Economical characteristic Drip irrigation Canal irrigation
Investment cost US$12,069 US$2,338
Maximum annual income US$6,000 US$3,500
Minimum positive annual income US$417 US$ 862
NPV (10 % SDR) US$- 7,140 US$4,168
IRR % 6 16
Maintenance cost US$ 215 US$62
Operational cost US$1,583 US$638
46
4.4 COMPARISON BETWEEN DRIP AND CANAL IRRIGATION
Different aspects need to be discussed when comparing drip with canal irrigation. The
comparison was made in table 19 for showing the context and the feasibilities of each irrigation
systems.
-
7/31/2019 erly saleng
61/84
Table 19: Comparison between drip irrigation and canal irrigation
Drip irrigation Canal irrigation
Amount of water use Less water More water
Types of crop Limited All crops and trees
Investment cost High Low
Labour use Less labour More labour
Labour payment high Medium or low
Income high Medium or Low
Spare parts use More use Less use
Eff