EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George...
-
Upload
dwight-robbins -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George...
EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP;
Environmental Health Decisionmaking
January 10, 2008
George Gray, Ph.D.
Assistant AdministratorEPA Office of Research and Development
Earth System ModelsWeatherClimateAtmosphereOthers…
Earth Observation SystemsRemotely-sensedIn situ
Decision Support
On-going feedback to optimizevalue and reduce gaps
Policy Decisions
ManagementDecisions
PersonalDecisions
SocietalBenefits
DATA
Predictions
Observations
Linking Earth Observations to Societal Benefits
Report on the Environment (ROE)
• Compilation of indicators
• Evaluation of trends
• Input for strategic outlook and priorities
Definition of Indicator
• “For EPA’s Report on the Environment, an indicator is a numerical value derived from actual measurements of a pressure, state or ambient condition, exposure, or human health or ecological condition over a specified geographic domain, whose trends over time represent or draw attention to underlying trends in the condition of the environment.”
Criteria for Indicators• The indicator is useful. It answers (or makes an important
contribution to answering) a question in the ROE. • The indicator is objective. It is developed and presented in
an accurate, clear, complete, and unbiased manner. • The indicator is transparent and reproducible. The specific
data used and the specific assumptions, analytic methods, and statistical procedures employed are clearly stated.
• The underlying data are characterized by sound collection methodologies, data management systems to protect its integrity, and quality assurance procedures.
• Data are available to describe changes or trends and the latest available data are timely.
• The data are comparable across time and space, and representative of the target population. Trends depicted in this indicator accurately represent the underlying trends in the target population.
Structure of ROE
• Organized around 27 questions considered to be important to EPA’s mission
• Includes 87 peer-reviewed indicators
• Trends evaluated in five areas: air, water, land, human health, and ecosystems
Examples of Key Questions
• What are the trends in outdoor air quality and their effects on human health and the environment?
• What are the trends in greenhouse gas emissions and concentrations?
• What are the trends in extent and condition of fresh surface waters and their effects on human health and the environment?
• What are the trends in health status in the U.S.?• The extent and distribution of the Nation’s
ecological systems?
Challenges and Opportunities
• Data gaps
• Indicator research
• Analysis of trends
• Strategic planning
Status of ROE
• First version of ROE (Draft) Released June 2003
• Second version of ROE Being revised to address SAB and
public comments and include latest year of data
Expected for release Spring of 2008 (Earth Day)
http://www.epa.gov/ord/roe
Outcome Performance Evaluation Framework for GEOSS
Outcomes Impacts
The 9 Societal Benefit Areas
SecondaryBenefits
Level 1
Uptake of GEO standards, etc. and implementation of GEO recommend-ations
Level 2
Changes to information system inter-operability & information accessibility
Level 3
Changes to decision support (end user) products & services
Level 4
Responses by affected populations to improved decision support
GEOSS
GEOProcesses
ProcessOutputs
Process Outcomes
GEO & GEO Secretariat
Outcome Performance Indicators for GEOSS
• Examples of Outcome Performance Indicators that were developed in 2007:
Canada developed draft indicators on Soil Moisture
U.S. EPA developed draft indicators on Air Quality (AIRNow – International)
Any Questions?