Energy Policy and Economic Recovery 2010 - 2015 Dublin Economics Workshop Symposium Kieran O’Brien...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Energy Policy and Economic Recovery 2010 - 2015 Dublin Economics Workshop Symposium Kieran O’Brien...
Energy Policy and Economic Recovery2010 - 2015
Dublin Economics Workshop Symposium
Kieran O’Brien16th June 2011
Introduction
Irish Academy of Engineering
Energy Standing Committee
Reports
Current Perspective Short Term Economic Recovery Competitiveness
June 2011
Agenda
Energy v Electricity
Competitiveness
Demand and Investment
Natural Gas
Large scale renewables
The “16% renewables” target
Conservation
Privatisation
Conclusions June 2011
Competitiveness – Natural Gas
Irish natural gas industry performed very well in the recent periods of extremely high demand.
Exceptionally cold weather: Drove up heating demand Closed down wind generation
Ireland is part of the UK natural gas market. Pre tax: Our prices are higher than the UK… But lower than mainland Europe.
June 2011
Industrial Gas Prices - PretaxBand I3 - S1 2010
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ro
man
ia
Un
ited
Kin
gd
om
Den
mar
k
Bu
lgar
ia
Lat
via
Net
her
lan
ds
Gre
ece
Po
rtu
gal
Bel
giu
m
Irel
and
Sp
ain
Ital
y
Fin
lan
d
Cze
ch R
epu
blic
Po
lan
d
Slo
vaki
a
Lit
hu
ania
Fra
nce
Ger
man
y
Hu
ng
ry
Slo
ven
ia
Lu
xem
bo
urg
Sw
eden
€/GJ
Competitiveness – Electricity
Pre tax or post tax comparisons? PPP corrections –or not?
Competitiveness has improved Prices were typically 35% to 45%
higher than the EU average Now about 15% to 25% higher
In terms of the overall economic efficiency of the Irish power industry we have plenty of room for improvement
June 2011
IA IB IC ID IE-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
Industrial Electricity PricesPremium (%) over EU Average
Pre-Tax Post-Tax
Consumption Band
% Premium
DB DC DD DE-50
0
50
Domestic Electricity PricesPremium (%) over EU Av-
erage
Pre-Tax Post-Tax
Consumption band
% Premium
Demand and Investment Energy demand growth has collapsed as a result of the economic
collapse. We have refused for several years to recognise reality.
The policies of the 2007 White Paper are utterly inappropriate today.
We are now formally revising policy but…
What has taken us so long?
Why are we so reluctant to carry out quality techno-economic studies and base policy on evidence.
Why don’t our regulators insist on “price impact analyses” for all policies or investment proposals as is standard practice in jurisdictions with developed economic regulation.
June 2011
Demand and Investment –Natural Gas
Complete the Corrib project Undo the damage the done to Ireland’s reputation Maybe even sort out our entirely dysfunctional planning regulations
Promote investment in Gas storage Seasonal and operational
Promote LNG importation facilities Long term supply security
June 2011
Demand and Investment –Electricity
Consistently over-estimated demand for the past half decade.
Our investment in both generation and networks over the past decade has been excessive
Minimise investment in new facilities which are not needed
Sweat our existing assets! June 2011
0
1000
2000
3000
Generation SurplusLow Growth Scenario
NI RoI All-Island
Year
MW
Natural Gas –a game changer?
Vast new reserves of “unconventional gas”
250 years at current consumption -IEA
NOT in the Middle East!
Dispersed resources + LNG = global gas market
Ireland’s generation mix suits this fuel more than most other countries. June 2011
Natural Gas –a “fracking” problem?
Environmental regulation Undoubtedly some poor practices in the
US.
Banned in France –already!
IEA report
Opinion: Probably won’t be produced in Western
Europe. But will be produced elsewhere in
sufficient quantities to restrain world gas prices
And in Ireland? June 2011
Large scale renewables
Only onshore wind by 2020. Target is 42% of generation
Well known issues of intermittency. Problematic in a lightly connected system.
Full techno-economic study please! Include ALL capex and opex
arising from the proposed investment.
June 2011
“Nevertheless, the identified limitations clearly imply challenges for power system economics and project viability as well as regulation; this was out of the scope of the studies and needs further analysis.”EirGrid June 2010
ESRI 2009“For a small and isolated electricity system such as Ireland,a high penetration of wind is economically sound only with increased interconnection to Great Britain, since wind generation would otherwise be curtailed. Not surprisingly, for low fuel prices the least-cost scenario contains low levels of wind generation whereas the opposite is true for high fuel prices.”
Assumptions“We analyse the costs to the system for a variety of fuel prices and carbon emission permit costs, as outlined in Table 1, interacting each level of carbon permit price with each level of fuel price. We assume that natural-gas prices change in proportion to the changes in oil prices.
Large scale renewables –Why?
1. Meeting carbon abatement obligations. Buy permits, it’s the cheapest option by
a mile.
2. Becoming a major exporter of renewable electricity. Techno-economic study please. Include full costs -please. Can we compete with marginal French
nuclear on a Normandy beach? Perfect opportunity for the private sector.
3. Encourage new technology like marine generation and capture some of the supply chain activities? Enterprise argument. Not significant this decade in energy
termsJune 2011
Approximate cost of using renewable electricity for CO2 Abatement
Technology REFIT Tariff
Cost of Emission
Saving
€/MWh €/tCO2
Ocean Energy 220 578Offshore Wind 140 348Biomass CHP 120 245Onshore Wind 66.4 114Biomass used in existing peat Stations
90 43
Large scale renewables – “the 16% target”
We have agreed with the EU to produce 16% of our final energy from renewables by 2020
We have decided ourselves to do this by generating 42% of our electricity from renewables by 2020. Onshore wind is the only real option in this timescale.
The cost has been variously estimated at between €6bn and €12bn. We really don’t know because we have never properly done the studies.
Neither security of supply, cost of production or carbon mitigation arguments justify this expenditure.
We are told the agreement is “cast-in-stone”. Just like our international debt obligations!
Maybe it is time to “restructure”, or “re-profile” or just “kick the can down the road a bit”.
Seek a derogation to 2025. The world won’t end. June 2011
Privatisation
The Irish Academy of Engineering has no position on the ownership of public utilities and does not purport to offer any policy advice on the topic.
We are aware of pressure from the EU/IMF to sell state assets and the Government’s commissioning of a preliminary report on the issue.
With respect to power generation assets we have a particular concern. The addition of large quantities of intermittent generation with priority dispatch will seriously
impact the economic return from existing investments, including quite new CCGT plant. Reducing the load factor on this plant will “partially strand” it in economic terms. The cost of this partial stranding will either be borne by investors or customers. In the case of
state owned plant this boils down to taxpayers or electricity consumers which probably equates to the same thing.
A sale of such plant will immediately crystalise such future losses.
The policy of adding large amounts of intermittent generation with priority dispatch to an already oversupplied power system will, in the event of a sale of state owned generation assets, seriously reduce the price that the taxpayer is likely to receive for those assets.
June 2011
Conservation
The IEA has long recognized that at least half the effort in reducing carbon emissions must come from conservation.
During the boom years in Ireland we focused on energy production and did little on conservation until ex Minister Gormley : Introduced mandatory building insulation standards Incentivised a switch from petrol to more efficient diesel engines
There is a significant opportunity for investment in improving insulation standards in the existing building stock. Such investment carries the added advantage that very little would “leak” out
of the economy and therefore it would provide a significant economic stimulus.
June 2011
Transport
Existing policies encouraging the switch to diesel have been very successful
Policies incentivising a switch to electric Vehicles (EVs) are likely to be costly and ineffective.
When the technology is “right” and costs have dropped customers will move to EVs.
In the absence of a motor industry it makes little sense for Ireland to subsidise the early adoption of this technology.
June 2011
Conclusions (1)
Power prices in Ireland have significant room for improvement in competitiveness terms.
Utilising Natural Gas in the large existing fleet of efficient gas fired plant is likely to be the best way to keep power prices down.
Additionally, Ireland should substantially curtail capital expenditure in the power sector reflecting the drop in demand growth.
A revolution has taken place in the production of natural gas internationally and there are strong prospects of substantially increased supply and price moderation for the coming decade. This could be a lucky break for Ireland – as long as we avail of it. Given our oversupply of generation we can afford to wait and see for the next five years.
Unless it can be demonstrated that a strong business case exists for exporting renewable electricity, the on-shore wind generation target of 42% renewable electricity by 2020 should be abandoned. A derogation should be sought from the EU in respect of the 16% target.
In as much as investment is available it should be targeted towards conservation and in particular to the retrofitting of insulation to the existing building stock. June 2011
Conclusions (2)
Continuation of the current policy involving the addition of large amounts of intermittent generation with priority dispatch to an oversupplied power system will lead to significant load factor reductions on existing plant thereby partially stranding it and greatly reducing its economic value.
Any sale of such state owned plant will promptly crystalise the above losses and significantly and adversely impact the price paid to the taxpayer for these assets.
Energy security over the coming decade will best be assured by: Completing the Corrib project Investing in Irish gas storage Encouraging the development of an Irish LNG re-gassification terminal
Planning and permitting procedures in Ireland have been shown time and again to be highly dysfunctional. Political reform is required in this area. June 2011
Energy Policy and Economic Recovery2010 - 2015
June 2011
END
De-linking Oil and Natural Gas
June 2011
IEA: June 2011
June 2011
IEA June 2011• “This continued reliance on oil indexation in continental Europe contrasts with
the dominant role played by gas-to-gas competition in the mainland United Kingdom market (as in North America)”
• “Demands from the European gas utilities for wholesale pricing reform are meeting considerable resistance from major import suppliers, notably Gazprom (despite the limited duration concessions by Gazprom mentioned above) and Sonatrach.”
• “Spot trading in Europe continues to grow rapidly… prices across hubs are converging”
• Volatility will be a consequence of gas-on-gas competion.
• Continental Europe: the jury is out on if and when gas-on-gas competition will arrive.
• Ireland? A judgement call. June 2011
Energy Policy and Economic Recovery2010 - 2015
June 2011
END(Again!)