Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: Efficacy and Safety...
-
Upload
dinah-dennis -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
5
Transcript of Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: Efficacy and Safety...
Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia:
Efficacy and Safety OutcomesEfficacy and Safety Outcomesof the CATIE Trialof the CATIE Trial
Ira D. Glick, MD
Stanford University School of Medicine
For Jeffrey Lieberman, MD and the CATIE Investigators
Question
• What to take away from CATIE
Message
• One piece of a puzzle
Disclosures
• Subcontracted site PI
• Industry
• NIMH
• Colleagues
Strengths
• Design
• Sample
• Non-industry sponsored
• Efficacy
• Effectiveness
EPS + TDEPS + TD
Weight Gain
Weight Gain
Insulin Resistance
Insulin Resistance
Hyper-glycemiaHyper-
glycemia
CVDCVD
Hyper-lipidemiaHyper-
lipidemia
Weight GainWeight Gain
DiabetesDiabetes
Hyper Glycemia
Hyper Glycemia
Insulin Resistance
Insulin Resistance
QTcQTc
CVDCVD
DyslipidemiaDyslipidemia
Prior Safety Concerns
Current Safety Concerns
Side Effects of Atypical Antipsychotics: Side Effects of Atypical Antipsychotics: Shift in Risk Perception Shift in Risk Perception
QTc
EPS
Neurologic Side Effects
NIMH-sponsored research program to NIMH-sponsored research program to evaluate the effectiveness of antipsychotic evaluate the effectiveness of antipsychotic
medications for schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s medications for schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease in broad patient populations and disease in broad patient populations and
““real-world” settingsreal-world” settings
Primary Questions Addressed Primary Questions Addressed by CATIE Schizophrenia Trialby CATIE Schizophrenia Trial
• How do the second generation antipsychotics compare with a representative first generation antipsychotic?
• What is the comparative effectiveness of the second generation antipsychotic drugs?
• Are the second generation antipsychotics cost-effective?
Stroup TS et al. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:15-31.
CATIE: CATIE: Broad Inclusion & Broad Inclusion & Minimal Exclusion CriteriaMinimal Exclusion Criteria
• DSM-IV schizophrenia, 18-65 years old
• Not first-episode or treatment resistant
• Concomitant medications, medical illnesses, substance use disorders allowed
• No adjunctive antipsychotic after randomization
Stroup TS et al. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:15-31.
CATIE Schizophrenia Trial DesignCATIE Schizophrenia Trial Design
1460 patients with SCZ
ComorbidityOther meds
Participants who discontinue Phase 2 choose one of the
following open-label treatments
•ARIPIPRAZOLE
•FLUPHENAZINE DECANOATE
•PERPHENAZINE
•RISPERIDONE
•OLANZAPINE
•ZIPRASIDONE
•QUETIAPINE
•2 of the antipsychotics above
Phase 3Phase 1*
R
OLANZAPINE
QUETIAPINE
RISPERIDONE
ZIPRASIDONE
PERPHENAZINE
Double-blind, random treatment assignment.
Phase 2
CLOZAPINE(open-label)
OLANZAPINE, QUETIAPINE or RISPERIDONE
OLANZAPINE, QUETIAPINE or RISPERIDONE
ZIPRASIDONE
R
R
No one assigned to same drug as in Phase 1
Participants who discontinue Phase 1 choose either the
clozapine or the ziprasidone randomization pathways
*Phase 1A: participants with TD (N=231) do not get randomized to perphenazine; phase 1B: participants who fail perphenazine will be randomized to an atypical (olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone) before eligibility for phase 2.
Stroup TS et al. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:15-31.
•CLOZAPINE
Primary Outcome Measure:Primary Outcome Measure:All-Cause Treatment DiscontinuationAll-Cause Treatment Discontinuation
All-Cause Discontinuation
Efficacy Tolerability
Clinician Input Patient Input
Phase I ResultsPhase I Results
CATIE Phase 1: CATIE Phase 1: Double-Blinded and RandomizedDouble-Blinded and Randomized
Persons with TD not assigned to perphenazine
Stroup TS et al. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:15-31.
1460 Patientswith
SchizophreniaRandomized
Olanzapine 7.5–30 mg/day
Perphenazine 8–32 mg/day
Quetiapine 200–800 mg/day
Risperidone 1.5–6 mg/day
Ziprasidone 40–160 mg/day *
* Ziprasidone added after 40% sample enrolled
Highlights of Phase IHighlights of Phase I• High rate of discontinuation (switching) %74
– Hypothesized 60%
– Consistent with practice and clinical trials
• OLZ most effective – Best efficacy, worst side effects
• PER comparably effective to SGAs– Very slightly higher EPS
• No differential effects of SGAs on Sxs including negative Sxs– Cognition, substance abuse, violence ?
• Differences in types and severity of side effects
• Consistent results across multiple measures within domains
Phase II-E & T Phase II-E & T ResultsResults
CATIE Phase 2: CATIE Phase 2: Preference Pathways Preference Pathways
(for people who discontinue Phase 1)(for people who discontinue Phase 1)
Randomization within chosen pathways
EfficacyPathway
TolerabilityPathway
Clozapine—open-label
Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Risperidone—one of these not taken in Phase 1
Ziprasidone
Randomized
Randomized
Stroup TS et al. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:15-31.
Hypothesized CLZ
superior
Hypothesized ZIP superior
Highlights of Phase 2EHighlights of Phase 2E
• High rate of discontinuation (switching) %65
• CLZ most effective and OLZ next most effective
– Best efficacy, worst side effects (1 agranulocytosis)
• Differences in types and severity of side effects
• Consistent results across multiple measures within domains
Highlights of Phase 2THighlights of Phase 2T• High rates of discontinuation (switching) %70
• Overall RIS and OLZ more effective than QUET and ZIP– RIS most effective in patients Phase 1 who switched
for tolerability
– OLZ most effective in patients Phase 1 who switched for efficacy
• Differences in types and severity of side effects
• Consistent results across multiple measures within domains
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Change in Neurocognitive Composite Score After 18 Months of Treatment
Ziprasidone Cohort
z-Sc
ore
Cha
nge
from
Bas
elin
e to
18
Mon
ths
Keefe RSE, et al. Presented at: 61st SOBP Annual Meeting; May 18-20, 2006; Toronto, Canada.
27
27
21
34
23
N above histogram
Overall differences between treatments
(p<.05)
Perphenazine Risperidone Quetiapine Olanzapine
TD Patients Excluded
Ziprasidone
Difficulties in Interpretation
• Design
• Sample
• Dosing
• Stratification
• Statistical analysis
• All APDs are generally effective but have various limitations as reflected by high rates of discontinuation, intolerable side effects and failure to adequately control symptoms.
• In non-refractory patients olanzapine is more efficacious than the other SGAs (other than clozapine) but also was associated with significant weight gain and metabolic changes.
• Intermediate potency FGAs (e.g. perphenazine, loxapine, molindone, thiothixene) are likely comparably effective to the SGAs and, in moderate doses, as well tolerated as the newer drugs.
Summary FindingsSummary Findings
• There is variation in the side effects of the antipsychotic drugs which for individual patients can be substantial.
• Clozapine and olanzapine produced the most weight and metabolic effects followed by quetiapine and risperidone.
• Ziprasidone has the least weight and metabolic effects.
Summary FindingsSummary Findings
• Treatments for persons with schizophrenia must be individualized. Doctors and patients must carefully evaluate the tradeoffs between efficacy and side effects in choosing an appropriate medication.
Summary FindingsSummary Findings
• For patients whose symptoms don’t improve with initial treatment clozapine is most effective followed by olanzapine.
• For patients who must switch medications due to side effects the best alternative depends on the individual side effects.
Summary FindingsSummary Findings
Summary FindingsSummary Findings
• Perphenazine is significantly less costly than other medications and not significantly or substantially less effective.
Summary FindingsSummary Findings
• The superiority of the SGAs may be most evident in the refractory end of the schizophrenia spectrum.
Findings
• Cloz: good
• O and R>Q
• Z:?
• FGA=SGA:?
Message
• Schizophrenia difficult to treat
• Pts/family/MDs switch often
• Each med has differential efficacy and side effects
Pearls
• Monotherapy
• Adequate dose and duration
• Don’t do polypharmacy
• Always combine with individual and family psychosocial intervention
HIGHLIGHTSHIGHLIGHTS All antipsychotic medications are effective but have All antipsychotic medications are effective but have
substantial limitations reflected by high discontinuation substantial limitations reflected by high discontinuation ratesrates
Olanzapine and Clozapine best efficacy but worst side Olanzapine and Clozapine best efficacy but worst side effectseffects
Perphenazine surprisingly comparable to atypicalsPerphenazine surprisingly comparable to atypicals Differences in types & severity of side effectsDifferences in types & severity of side effects Ziprasidone has least weight and metabolic side effectsZiprasidone has least weight and metabolic side effects What drug you should switch to depends on what What drug you should switch to depends on what
treatment you have received and why you stopped it.treatment you have received and why you stopped it. The superiority of the SGAs may be most evident in the The superiority of the SGAs may be most evident in the
refractory end of the schizophrenia spectrum.refractory end of the schizophrenia spectrum.
Principles from CATIE Results Principles from CATIE Results 1. Antipsychotic medications are not equivalent or interchangeable1. Antipsychotic medications are not equivalent or interchangeable
2. Individual history, symptoms, side effects and circumstances 2. Individual history, symptoms, side effects and circumstances must guide medication choicesmust guide medication choices
3. Choice of medication is vital given the complexity and3. Choice of medication is vital given the complexity andheterogeneity of schizophreniaheterogeneity of schizophrenia
4. CATIE does not support a blanket "fail first" policy4. CATIE does not support a blanket "fail first" policy
5. CATIE does not support severe restrictions in formularies;5. CATIE does not support severe restrictions in formularies;algorithms may be helpful, based on individual needsalgorithms may be helpful, based on individual needs
6. CATIE does not mean people doing well on newer medications 6. CATIE does not mean people doing well on newer medications should be switched on older drugsshould be switched on older drugs
7. CATIE does not mean it is always best for the patient to stay with7. CATIE does not mean it is always best for the patient to stay withthe current treatmentthe current treatment
Collaborators Principal Investigators
Joe McEvoy Scott Stroup Diana Perkins Marvin Swartz Richard Keefe Ed Davis Bob Rosenheck Sonia Davis John Hsaio Jeffrey Lieberman 57 Site Investigators