Eeva Liisa

30
NORTHERN CHILDHOOD NORTHERN CHILDHOOD lenses to children’s lives in Northern lenses to children’s lives in Northern areas areas Date: November 23th- 25th Date: November 23th- 25th Place: Hotel Levitunturi, Kittilä Place: Hotel Levitunturi, Kittilä

description

 

Transcript of Eeva Liisa

Page 1: Eeva Liisa

NORTHERN CHILDHOOD NORTHERN CHILDHOOD – – lenses to children’s lives in Northern areaslenses to children’s lives in Northern areas

Date: November 23th- 25thDate: November 23th- 25thPlace: Hotel Levitunturi, KittiläPlace: Hotel Levitunturi, Kittilä

Page 2: Eeva Liisa

Eeva-Liisa Kronqvist Eeva-Liisa Kronqvist

Challenges in the analysis of video Challenges in the analysis of video interaction - interaction -

- Explorations on young children’s learning- Explorations on young children’s learning

Eeva-Liisa KronqvistEeva-Liisa KronqvistUniversity of OuluUniversity of Oulu

Page 3: Eeva Liisa

Learning – a social phenomenLearning – a social phenomen

• Bronfenbrenner (1979): developmental processes and context interact to shape both individual lives and reciprocally the context in which lives are lived

• Vygotsky’s (1978): the importance of social interaction for development Development cannot be separated from its social and cultural context; To be able to understand psychological processes and behaviour, we need to understand the social interaction, and the tools and signs that mediate them

Page 4: Eeva Liisa

• Why collaboration is beneficial?

There is much research about how collaborative activity may facilitate certain kinds of cognitive operations, learning and social adjustment in the classroom.

Benefits of collaborative learning and a social network:• academic gains across different curriculum domains and enhanced

socialisation among peers • children with multiple disabilities have also benefited through acquiring

enhanced communication and motor skills

• certain forms of conflicts can advance learning

• interaction between peers offer the opportunity for the exchange of perspectives

• communication and argumentation skills

• peer-peer interaction (vs adult-peer which include social authority)

• children’s collaborative activity has also helped them in some of their social problems, for example in difficulties to pay attention to learning tasks or aggressive behaviour

.

Page 5: Eeva Liisa

• The social dynamics of interaction is important for promoting learning

• The analysis of collaborative activity in pre-schools and schools showed that those pairs who talked, planned and negotiated the most were the most successful in solving problems (Mercer 1996)

Page 6: Eeva Liisa

How to research peer collaboration and How to research peer collaboration and learninglearning

Lines of research on peer interactions and collaborations (Branco 2003):

1. Research on various social forms of behavior

2. Developmentally oriented tradition• developmetal patterns – from simple social directed behavior to highly

complex and sophisticated interaction patterns

• experimentally oriented projects searching for indication the superioity of joint work over individual efforts in problems solving situations

3. Interpretative approach• children’s growing abilities concerning their active participation in process of

co-construction of meaning• researches the origins of ”peer culture

Page 7: Eeva Liisa

New trends for researching psychological phenomena in New trends for researching psychological phenomena in interactioninteraction

• Branco (2003):There is a need for paradigm shift, that privileges the study of processess instead of outcomes, and the use of qualitative methodological approaches to analyze the phenomena

Page 8: Eeva Liisa

Which strategies do children use in collaboration and in teaching/tutor inganother child in a new game?

- and how to analyze the strategies children use?

Page 9: Eeva Liisa

The paths doing the analysisThe paths doing the analysis

Stage I: empirical analysis based on observations in naturalistic settings• Observations on tutoring interactions between young children (Verba

1998):• expert’s actions: comprehension (instrumental help):

1) informing & giving directions 2) demostrating/modelling• novice participation: request for help: 1) direct 2) indirect

• Kronqvist 2004. What happens in a group of children? Collaboration of small children, its construction and development in spontaneous play situations.

• children’s initiatives in spontaneous play, conflicts and the nature of collaboration

Page 10: Eeva Liisa

Example 1. Construction play

Children’s initiatives and conflicts– Analysis: coding system and

computer based analysis of data http://www.noldus.com/site/doc200401012

Page 11: Eeva Liisa
Page 12: Eeva Liisa

Stage II: overall learning patterns based on Stage II: overall learning patterns based on heuristic analysisheuristic analysis

The framework of the analysis for the tutoring and learning process

• The interaction sequence was divided in three stages:

1 Beginning stage2 Mid of the tutoring process3 End of the tutoring process

• The overall nature of the tutoring based on the analysis of social relationships and conversational analysis in peer dyads

Page 13: Eeva Liisa

Table 1. The framework for the analysisTable 1. The framework for the analysisCategorizationBeginning stage:stating goalsgiving first directionsgiving more directions asking questionsdemonstratingsupportinggiving statementsansweringcommentingoff-task

Mid of the tutoring process:facilitatingencouraginggiving feed-backcorrecting mistakes anchoring attentionhelpingcritizing/evaluatingasking help asking correctionscommentsresistingmaintainingself-talkoff-task

Description

Discussions about what should be done, stating goals, Explaining,giving directions “we have to try..”

Modelling,showing e.g. “put that right there”Giving support e.g. “and there you go, that’s how you play the game”Commenting the nature of the game .“’It’s so easy”

Providing help by pointing, handling et.Encouraging .“It’s difficult but you can do it”Showing which piece went wrongHelping concretely to put the pieceEvaluating if it’s was wrong or not “yes, it was”Asking for concrete help:”Where is the blue square?”Commenting on the game or own task “I am really good at this other game”Maintain cooperation “Try to, you don’t need to do all”Activity not related to the task

Page 14: Eeva Liisa

End of the tutoring process:encouraginggiving feed-backevaluatingcommentinghelpingasking questionsresisting

Description:

Confirming the right result: eg.”you got two good jobs”Or evaluating: “It’s wrong, Jacob”Ok, the game is over

Page 15: Eeva Liisa

The overall tutoring patterns during the sessionsThe overall tutoring patterns during the sessions

Helping-encouraging pattern: child is helping, supporting and assisting another child

Together-doing pattern: joint activity characterized by collaborative working with the task

Resisting-maintaining pattern: child is resisting the task and tutor is trying to maintain the activity

Tutor-centered, directed pattern: tutor is controlling and giving direct advise

Restlessness pattern: difficulties to concentrate, restless, laughing, moving around

Page 16: Eeva Liisa

• Example 2. Max and Jacob

Page 17: Eeva Liisa

Stage III: structured and semi-strucutured Stage III: structured and semi-strucutured learning situations and analysis based on learning situations and analysis based on

microlevel interaction analysismicrolevel interaction analysis

• ERA – The Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment by Roseanne Clark

• Video-based early intervention programs:– Vigi – Video Interaction Guidance by MLL, Finland– Marte Meo – video-based method supoorting child-parent interaction– Webster-Stratton – social skills and problem-solving trainging dor

children– common traits: microlevelanalysis: parents variables, child variables and

dyad variables

Page 18: Eeva Liisa

• Example 3. Episodes and interaction analysis– Pre-school:

• Aleksi and Eeva, 6 yrs

Page 19: Eeva Liisa
Page 20: Eeva Liisa

• Milla and Ville, 3 yrs old

Page 21: Eeva Liisa
Page 22: Eeva Liisa

• Emma, 5yrs and Mona, 2 yrs

• learning from siblings

Page 23: Eeva Liisa
Page 24: Eeva Liisa

Elementary school, 1.class, 7 yrs

• Aino and Ulpu

Page 25: Eeva Liisa
Page 26: Eeva Liisa

• Petri and Joona, 7 yrs

Page 27: Eeva Liisa
Page 28: Eeva Liisa

• Interaction analysis – Child A (tutor) varibales: the quality of voice, mood, verbal

utterances, emotions

- Child B (tutee) variables: activity level, communication, initiatives, mood

- Interaction variables: emotionality, syncrony, intersubjectivity

Page 29: Eeva Liisa

Discussion Discussion • Do children learn from other children?

* all children could assist their partners through a variety of tutoring strategies*experts provided a variety of forms of assistance, including especially facilitating and encouraging modes*they also corrected mistakes and tried to maintain tutee’s attention

• Requirements for the good peer-learning situations:* children have to be active* the meaning of adult is significant for foster learning* the role child has in the tutoring process, affects to his/her activity in peer-learning situations: as tutor the child usually is more active than as tutee

• What about the analysis? • Barron (2006): ”Video analysis can be extraordinarily productive as a

way to deepen our understanding of learning and human interaction”

Page 30: Eeva Liisa

http://www.noldus.com/site/doc200401012