ED-HOSPITALIST SYNERGY
-
Upload
emcare -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
15.642 -
download
2
Transcript of ED-HOSPITALIST SYNERGY
Presented by:
PRESENTING:
ED‐HOSPITALIST SYNERGY
Robert Moskowitz, MD MBAMedical Director of Emergency Dept
Mercy HospitalMiami, FL
Page 1
Sareda Nur, MDMedical Director of Hospitalist Services
Southern Hills Medical CenterNashville, TN
OBJECTIVES• Examine common inefficiencies in care/flow during a patient's
hospitalization
• Outline the synergistic effects of aligned incentives between ED physicians and hospitalists
• Describe a patient‐centric model that encompasses a patient's entire hospitalization
• Offer our personal experiences and outcomes in assessing and integrating the Door‐to‐Door model
• Offer a template for hospitals looking to increase efficiencies that are sustainable
Page 2
ED ‘SILO’‐ISMS1. Sole focus on getting the patient ‘door to floor’ or ‘out the door’
2. Define efforts in minutes
3. Quick handoffs/soft sells
4. Minimizing testing
5. ‘Faceless Voice’ syndrome
6. Ignorant of inpatient resources
7. Reactive feedback to patient care
Page 4
HOSPITALIST ‘SILO’‐ISMS1. Defining efforts in days
2. ‘Ribbon‐on‐the‐box’ syndrome
3. Reanalyze ED workups
4. Faceless Voice syndrome
5. Ignorant of ED resources
6. Floor to Door focus
7. Dealing with Consultants
Page 5
ADMINISTRATION ‘SILO’‐ISMS1. Departmental meeting structures
2. Information sharing between departments
3. ‘Stick to your Stethoscope’ syndrome
4. Visitation fly‐bys
5. Departmental budgeting
6. Staffing
Page 6
SYNERGISTIC FLOW MODELPage 7
Walk‐ins
Transfers
Direct AdmitsPost‐Op Cases
EMS
DOOR TO DOOR
Transfers
• SNFs• ALFs• Home• Family Members• Group Homes• Shelters• Rehabilitation• Psych/Detox
WHAT ARE WE MISSING?Better Understanding of:
• Terms
• Utilization
• Resources
• Comparable
• Successes/Failures
Learning to:
• Allocate roles
• Share information
• Reassess efforts
• Educate/Implement
• Trust
Page 8
Page 9
ROAD MAP FOR SUCCESS: LARGE SCALE LEAN PROJECT
Flow Improvement in the ED: Streamline the Inflow and Outflow
• These can occur in parallel or overlap in the details, but they both need to occur
• Requires active involvement of Hospital Administration
Flow Improvement House‐Wide
GOALS OF A PATIENT‐CENTRIC SYSTEMPage 10
1. Maximizing efficiency and eliminating waste in the staffs’ routines
2. Efficient workups and dispositions
3. Streamlining admission process from the ED
4. Improving discharge processes from the floor
5. Improving transfers within the hospital
6. Improving bed management systems
7. Reassessments/feedback systems
8. Accountability
9. Tracking data
SOUTHERN HILLS MEDICAL CENTER• Annual ED Volume 36,000K as of 5/2011
• 18 Bed ED (12 main, 6 bed Fast Track)
• 132 Beds Hospital
• 10% Admission Rate
• Prior to 2011 ‐ Separate ED provider and Hospitalist Groups
• 5/2011 ED Contract changeover
• 11/2011 Hospitalist Contract changeover
Page 11
SOUTHERN HILLS MEDICAL CENTER• At outset ED struggled with:
• Throughput times
• LPT/LPMSE rates
• (lower end of division)
• Patient satisfaction
• At outset Inpatient Medicine struggled with:
• Permanent/Committed staff
• Relationship between ED and Med Staff
• Opportunity/Environment right for change
Page 12
SOUTHERN HILLS TIME LINEED LEAN event ‐ Summer 2011
• 3 and 6 Month Goals
Hospital LEAN event ‐ February 2012
• 3, 6 and 9 Month Goals
Incremental improvements in
• All throughput metrics
• Increased patient satisfaction scores
• LPT/LPMSE rate decrease (front runner in division)
• Improved hospital culture and interdepartmental relations
• Increased ED and EMS volume
Page 13
ASSESSMENT OF PROCESSES AND PERSONNEL• ED Director & Hospitalist Director meetings
• Separate provider meetings
• Combined provider meetings
• Provider committee involvement
• Utilization meetings
• LEAN Events ‐ with all staff
• Multidisciplinary Rounds
• Flow Meetings ‐
• Separate department meetings with ancillary staff
• Step‐down fashion after LEAN events….but they NEVER end
Page 14
FUTURE STATERedefine the culture at the hospital by implementing a process that is:
• SUSTAINABLE
• PATIENT‐CENTRIC
• ACCOUNTABLE
• RE‐ASSESSABLE
Page 15
ROADMAP FOR SUCCESS
• Not an overnight process• Constant communication and reevaluation• Continuous education• Intestinal fortitude
Page 16