Economic benefits from using formate brines - Latest paper.
-
Upload
chester-york -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Economic benefits from using formate brines - Latest paper.
Economic benefits from using formate brines - Good well performance and recovery of reserves
• “High production rates with low skin” *
• “ We selected formate brine to minimise well control problems
and maximise well productivity”*
* Quotes by Statoil relating to Kvitebjoern wells (SPE 105733)
Economic benefits from using formate brines
- More efficient and safer drilling
“ a remarkable record of zero well control incidents in all 15
HPHT drilling operations and 20 HPHT completion operations”
Better/safer drilling environment saves rig-time costs • Stable hole: see LWD vs. WL calipers in shale
•Elimination of well control* and stuck pipe incidents •Good hydraulics, low ECD
•Good ROP in hard abrasive rocks
* See next slide for details
Formate Brines : Allow fast solids-free drilling
Solids-free formate brines drill deep horizontal well sections much faster than muds like OBM – and cause less formation damage
Economic benefits from using formate brines - Improved well control and safety
• Elimination of barite and its sagging problems
• Elimination of oil-based fluids and their gas solubility problem
• Low solids brine Low ECD (SG 0.04-0.06) and swab pressures
• Inhibition of hydrates
• Ready/rapid surface detection of well influx
• Elimination of hazardous zinc bromide brine
- Drill-in and completing with formate brine allows open hole completion with screens
- Clean well bores mean no tool/seal failures or blocked screens
- Completion time 50% lower than wells drilled with OBM
“ fastest HPHT completion operation ever performed in North Sea (12.7 days)”
Economic benefits from using formate brines
- More efficient/faster completions
• No differential sticking
• Pipe and casing running speeds are fast
• Mud conditioning and flow-check times are short
• Displacements simplified, sometimes eliminated
Duration of flow back(minutes)
Fluid Gain (bbl)
30 0.8
15 0.56
20 0.44
30 0.56
Flow check fingerprint for a Huldra well
Economic benefits from using formate brines - Operational efficiencies
Economic benefits from using formate brines - Good reservoir definition if Cs present in fluid
• High density filtrate and no barite
• Filtrate Pe up to 259 barns/electron
• Unique Cs feature - makes filtrate invasion highly visible against formation Pe of 2-3 b/e
• LWD can “see” the filtrate moving (e.g. see the resistivity log on far right – drill vs ream
• Good for defining permeable sands (see SAND-Flag on log right )
• Consistent and reliable net reservoir definition from LWD and wireline
Economic benefits from using formate brines - Good reservoir imaging
• Highly conductive fluid
• Clear resistivity images
• Information provided: - structural dip - depositional environment - geological correlations
Formate brines – Summary of economic benefits provided to users
Formate brines improve oil and gas field development economics by :
Reducing well delivery time and costs
Improving well/operational safety and reducing risk
Maximising well performance
Providing more precise reservoir definition
SPE 165761 (2012) “ Experience with Formate Fluids for Managed Pressure Drilling and Completion of Sub-Sea Carbonate Gas Development Wells”
Managed pressure drilling and completion of fractured carbonates with formate brine
• Petronas - Kanowit field – 2 sub-sea gas wells
• Managed pressure drilling in fractured carbonate with K formate brine improved economics by:
- Minimising fluid losses
- Reducing fluid cost (use K formate instead of Cs formate)
- Improving production by 50%
- Eliminating need for stimulation (no acidising)
Kanowit SS-1 : Production profile from start-up - natural clean-up – no stimulation
•100 MMscfd gas and 4,000 bpd condensate after 5 hours
• >150 MMscfd gas and > 6,000 bpd condensate after 9 hours
Kanowit SS-1 : Multi-rate well test results
Both wells can produce > 150 MMscfd gas and > 6,000 bpd condensate
The maximum potential flow rate figures are 50% higher than the technical potential predicted in the original field development plan.
MRT measurements on well SS-1 before acidizing (Mahadi et al, 2013)
MRT Test Choke size
(/64)
Well Head
Pressure
(psi)
Gas Flow rate
Choke correlation
(MMscfd)
Gas Flow rate
Sonar
(MMscfd)
PDG Pressure
(psi)
PDG Temp
(oF)
1 112 2874.4 159.16 147.61 3857.0 252
2 88 3273.0 111.85 108.76 3932.2 252
3 64 3476.8 63.46 64.51 3978.5 251.7
4 40 3560.5 25.84 28.01 3998.8 250.1
OPERATOR LOCATIONPacker Fluid
(ppg)BHT (°C)
BHT (°F)
Start Date
End Date
Comments
Devon WC 165 A-7 8.6 KFo 149 300 1/2005
Devon WC 165 A-8 8.6 KFo 149 300 1/2006
DevonWC 575 A-3
ST29.5 KFo 132 270 5/2005
WOG/Devon MO 862 #1 12.0 NaKFo 215 420 4/2005 5/2006Well P&A – H2O production – G-3 in excellent condition
BP/Apache HI A-5 #1 11.5 NaKFo 164 350 2/2002 4/2008Well P&A - Natural depletion – S13Cr in excellent condition
ExxonMobil MO 822 #7 12.0 NaKFo 215 420 2001
EPL ST 42 #1 11.5 NaKFo 133 272 2006
EPL ST 41 #F1 13.0 NaKFo 105 222 2006
EPL EC 109 A-5 11.5 NaKFo 121 250 2006
EPL ST 42 #2 12.8 NaKFo 132 270 2006
DominionWC 72 #3
BP110.0 NaFo 121 250 2006
EPLWC 98 A-3
ST112.7 NaKFo 153 307 2006
EPL WC 98 A-3 10.8 NaKFo 154 310 2007
Formate brines as packer fluids in GOM