Echoes of the Great War Resonate a Century...
Transcript of Echoes of the Great War Resonate a Century...
Echoes of the Great War Resonate a Century LaterAnalysis JULY 28, 2014 | 0419 Print Text Size
Summary
On July 28, 1914, exactly one month after Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his
wife were shot dead, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. The stage was set for
World War I, an inevitable result of decades of political maneuvering, militarization,
alliances and planning for a conflict that would shatter the great European epoch,
laying waste to empires and ascendant nations.
Analysis
German infantry in training a month before the start of World War I, June 30, 1914.
(Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)
Click to Enlarge
At the heart of World War I was the rise of Germany and the question of its place in the
European balance of power. Prussian statesman Otto Von Bismarck had painstakingly
crafted a modern, unified German nation through fire and blood, ensuring its survival
through shrewd realpolitik diplomacy. The new unified Germany remained wary of
potential threats from east and west, a concern reciprocated by nearby states, which
harbored deep-seated concerns and fears over Germany's rise that even Bismarck
could not allay. With the coronation of Kaiser Wilhelm II, a man known to be possessed
of unbridled ambition, the German question increasingly demanded an answer.
With the possibility of a Pan-European conflict growing, the Great Powers set about
drawing up strategic war plans. Each nation made its plans based on its unique
geopolitical position, but the grand designs were also deeply affected by a host of
secondary considerations. Constrained by a historic legacy of conquests, alliances and
rivalries, and shaped by emotional and political ideology, the war plans of the Great
Powers were a clash between seemingly sound strategy and each nation's unique and
subjective interests.
The original Schlieffen Plan -- a
scheme to rapidly deploy German
combat power to where it could be
decisively used -- envisaged a
German army bolstered by Austro-
Hungarian and Italian forces facing
off against an isolated France.
However, on the eve of World War I
Germany was left facing a two-front
war against France and Russia, with
only a distracted Austria-Hungary
for support, dismal chances of
Italian involvement (at least on the
side of Germany) and the high
likelihood of British involvement.
Helmuth von Moltke the Younger, the head of the armed forces who ultimately had to
take Germany to war, and his general staff had to contend with a significantly different
strategic reality than that first envisaged by Count Alfred von Schlieffen. It was in large
part due to Kaiser Wilhelm II's meddling and his obsession with weltpolitik, the desire to
achieve global power through aggressive diplomacy, that Germany went from being at
the center of an alliance between Austria-Hungary and Russia (the League of the
Three Emperors, formed in 1873) to facing the combined might of France, Russia and
the United Kingdom (the Triple Entente of 1907) with limited support. This fact not only
virtually ensured a two-front war against France and Russia, but it also raised the
possibility that Germany would face a crippling naval blockade -- the cost of
antagonizing great sea powers.
The German navy, once a very distant second to the land army, had gained
prominence in the decades immediately before World War I. Driven by the Kaiser's
obsession with projecting German military power around the world and aided by Grand
Adm. Alfred von Tirpitz's supreme drive and charisma, Germany spent enormous effort
and capital on the development of its High Seas Fleet. The focus on the creation of a
world-class battle fleet not only diverted significant resources from the army, it also
ultimately secured the enmity of Great Britain, Europe's premier naval power.
The United Kingdom, consistently preoccupied with the possible breakdown of the
balance of power in Europe and the emergence of a single great continental force, was
justifiably alarmed at the breakneck speed at which Germany was constructing its navy.
A victorious Germany with a powerful battle fleet would pose a genuine existential
threat to the United Kingdom. The Battle of Jutland aside, the High Seas Fleet did not
truly seek to defeat Britain's Grand Fleet; it was content to remain a threat as a "fleet in
being."
Grand Strategies
From the German perspective, the war had to be fought on land. From a strategic
military perspective, it is very hard to find fault with the original Schlieffen Plan. Even
Moltke the Younger, who certainly committed operational blunders once the war
started, could not truly be faulted for the plan that Germany went to war with. Germany
also faced the added pressure of time; every passing year diminished Germany's
relative military edge and tilted the balance against it as France militarized and Russia
continued to rebuild an army, schooled by lessons learned from war with the Japanese.
Faced with time constraints, saddled with many enemies and few allies, and facing a
war on two fronts, the most salient issue surrounding Germany's war plans was not a
dim chance of success; rather, it was the fact that the deployment and operational
blueprints were truly the best Germany could do given the circumstances.
Germany inevitably played a central role in defining the pace and direction of the
conflict in 1914, but the other Great Powers (and their plans) deserve much scrutiny,
especially the land powers of France, Russia and Austria-Hungary. French strategic
thought before the Great War, guided by the meticulous Gen. Joseph Joffre, was
grounded in the overwhelming belief and desire that France would avenge its
humiliating defeat of 1871 and recover its lost territories. By the time Joffre became
Click to Enlarge
chief of the general staff in 1911,
French war plans were significantly
bolstered by the high likelihood that
both Great Britain and Russia would
join any war against Germany.
In fact, the United Kingdom would
take at least a year to mobilize and
ship a force beyond the size of an
auxiliary British Expeditionary Force
to French shores. The slow pace at
which Russia could mobilize across
its vast territory was also well
known. Taking into account
Germany's conventional military
superiority over the French, Paris
would have arguably been better
served to assume the strategically
defensive position and seek to
absorb the inevitable German offensive. Once its allies fully committed to battle, the
French could then theoretically revert back to the offensive and overwhelm the
outnumbered Germans.
But given the French ideological commitment to the spirit of the offensive, such a plan
could not even be seriously considered. France was traumatized by its defeat in the
Franco-Prussian war, and so its military theorists gradually convinced themselves and
the nation that "only the offensive yields positive results." In fairness, most of Europe at
the time had embraced an offensive-minded warrior culture, but the French strategic
obsession with the "offensive a l'outrance" permeated through the French army,
especially after Joffre purged the officer class of "defensively-minded" commanders.
The attack was not only deemed to be more effective; it was considered morally
superior.
The operational and tactical adoption of offensive theory was to have damaging
consequences. The concept of "elan," or the will to win, often translated into massed
bayonet charges against dug-in machine gun positions. Although the French had
fielded a number of machine guns by 1914, automatic weapons did not have as
significant a role in French doctrine as the machine gun did in German tactical doctrine.
Even French uniforms showed a disdain for camouflage, emphasizing conspicuous
features such as blue hats and red pants. Saddled with "offensive spirit," Joffre created
Plan XVII, which primarily focused on a desire for rapid mobilization and concentration
in the border area to allow for rapid offensive and counteroffensive action.
The Russian Aspect
Russian strategic calculations revolved around two key considerations based on the
likelihood that Germany would have to attack France first. On the one hand, Russia
was under considerable pressure from Paris and was keen to drive a powerful offensive
against Germany, maximizing the advantage of Berlin's distraction by a two-front war.
On the other hand, Russia also had to take into account 40 divisions of the Austro-
Hungarian Empire south of the Carpathian Mountains. Russia wanted to strike at
Vienna before Austro-Hungarian forces could overwhelm Serbia, the ally that brought
Russia into war in the first place.
Because Germany was the pre-eminent threat, many believed that Russia should adopt
the 1910 version of Plan 19, which envisaged a withdrawal from the bulky and largely
indefensible Polish salient. This required the adoption of a defensive posture toward
Austria-Hungary with 19 divisions and the concentration of a very powerful force of 53
divisions against the nine German divisions in East Prussia. Unfortunately for the
French and for the wider allied war effort in general, the Russians ended up so radically
modifying Plan 19 that almost twice as many divisions were allocated for an Austria-
Hungarian offensive over a German East Prussian one.
In many ways, Austria-Hungary faced very similar decisions as the Russian Empire:
namely, concentrate forces against Russia to relieve pressure on its ally Germany, or
pursue a main thrust to the south to finally annihilate upstart Serbia and its 200,000-
strong army. In much the same way that Russia prioritized its own domestic
considerations and short-term gains, the Austro-Hungarian Empire could not give up its
ambition of striking at Belgrade and ended up dividing its forces in such a way that
there were both insufficient forces facing the Russian offensive as well as insufficient
forces left to take Serbia.
While the German issue had to be resolved, there was nothing inevitable about the way
the European powers resolved it. The plans leading up to war were saturated with
geopolitical factors, tempered and influenced by domestic considerations and left at the
mercy of previous foreign policy decisions. Occasionally, they went against prudent
strategy and geographic principles. Bismarck's brilliance was replaced by an arrogant
foreign policy that stacked the alliance system against Germany. French war plans
were heavily influenced by ideology. Russian and Austro-Hungarian strategic decisions
were beholden to domestic political considerations and foreign policy ambitions.
Germany felt that its place in Europe and in history had to be hardened between 1871
Hezbollah Closely Watches
Israel's Incursion into Gaza
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects
Argentine Petition
Borderlands: The View
Beyond Ukraine
Fourth Quarter Forecast
2013
Second Quarter Forecast
2013
Stratfor's Second Quarter
Forecast 2014
and World War II (and indeed, to the present).
One hundred years ago, millions of young men across Europe mobilized for war.
Leaving their homes, they marched across Belgium, Poland and the Balkans as pieces
of war plans their nation's leaders had agonized over for decades. All the Great Powers
involved in the war sought a decisive result but to no avail. None of the belligerents
were quickly pummeled into submission, as was anticipated. Instead, the war endured
for more than four years in trenches, mountains and the cold waters of the Atlantic and
the North Sea. World War I represented the beginning of the end of the European
epoch and forever altered the map, as it marked the demise of empires and the birth of
nations.
EDITOR'S CHOICE
RELATED CONTENT
Send us your thoughts on this report.
RELATED SITUATION REPORTS
Russia: G-8 Meeting In Sochi Canceled
MAR 24, 2014 | 15:14 GMT
Russia: G-7 Agrees To Impose More Sanctions
APR 25, 2014 | 21:12 GMT
Russia: G-7 Abstains From More Sanctions
JUN 5, 2014 | 03:35 GMT