DuPage ETSB Emergency Dispatch Interoperability Radio Project Presented to ETSB Radio Steering...
-
Upload
george-dennis -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of DuPage ETSB Emergency Dispatch Interoperability Radio Project Presented to ETSB Radio Steering...
DuPage ETSB Emergency Dispatch Interoperability Radio Project
Presented to
ETSB Radio
Steering Committee
January 27, 2011
Overview
Starting New Project Phase – Beginning Implementation Phase of Project; (Majority of) work has been defined, budgets established, and schedules set
Complexity Requires Oversight, Coordination – Multiple, interconnected sub-projects
Finite Timeframe – Timeframe is constrained by regulation, seasons, ETSB objectives
Actions Necessary – Remaining planning and decision making must be made promptly
Major Work Elements
Emergency Dispatch
Interoperability Radio Project
Radio Network Infrastructure (STARCOM21)
Wheaton OEM & Streamwood
SitesSubscriber Units ETSB Network
ReconfigurationPSAP
ConsolidationConsoles & Recorders
Countywide Fire Paging Solution
Radio Network Infrastructure (STARCOM21)
SCOPE: – STARCOM21 system enhancements to provide 95% Coverage, 12dB
In-Building Penetration, 2% Grade-of-Service– DuPage cell comprises eight sites (including Wheaton OEM &
Streamwood)– Work performed by Motorola and the STARCOM21 team – No direct
ETSB involvement
TIMELINE: Underway – October 2011
COST: “Impact Fee”, $5.4 MM
PRIORITIES, RISKS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: – Coverage testing during periods of full foliage– Wheaton OEM and Streamwood sites are essential, but have not yet
been contracted
Wheaton OEM & Streamwood Sites
SCOPE: Development of two existing RF sites for addition to STARCOM21 network
TIMELINE: Underway – August 2011
COST: Budgetary Numbers Not Yet Finalized
PRIORITIES, RISKS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: – ETSB to share cost of development of Streamwood with NWCD– ETSB to coordinate site use negotiations between Motorola and
DuPage County– DuPage County requirements have not been resolved– Sites are essential to meeting coverage and penetration requirements– Lengthy construction durations
Subscriber Units
SCOPE: Multiple orders, shipments, distributions, training
TIMELINE: Underway – March 2012
COST: $21.8 MM
PRIORITIES, RISKS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:– Talk-group template development is a priority– Subscriber deployment strategy includes multiple shipments of
subscriber units completed EOY 2011
ETSB Network Reconfiguration
SCOPE: Effort includes an assessment of the existing SONET data network, the determination of the requirements for future use by ETSB, integration with STARCOM21, and other county entities.– State-of-the-art technologies will be considered.
TIMELINE: Stalled
COST: TBD
PRIORITIES, RISKS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:– Services and service provider are being re-evaluated.– PSAP connections to STARCOM21 master site constrained by
STARCOM21 system requirements
PSAP Consolidation
SCOPE: TBD
TIMELINE: TBD
COST: TBD
PRIORITIES, RISKS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: – Known Consolidations
• Westmont/Downers Grove May 1• Woodridge, Lisle, Darien, Darien/Woodridge FPD to DU-COMM
May 1 – Need to finalize balance of PSAP site locations
Consoles & Recorders
SCOPE: New consoles, control stations and recorders at multiple PSAPs
TIMELINE: Underway – December 2011
COST: $6.2 MM
PRIORITIES, RISKS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:– Some uncertainty regarding final PSAP count and configuration– Staging and cutover will be especially challenging for DU-COMM due
to scale of operation and space constraints– Space preparation is the responsibility of the PSAP agency– Requires decisions on Talk Groups and Conventional Resources
Countywide Fire Paging Solution
SCOPE: – Narrow-banding of existing VHF paging & toning system– Patch to STARCOM21 system
TIMELINE: Goal is to coincide with overall project
COST: $1.5 MM
PRIORITIES, RISKS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:– Reimbursement program – Eligible agencies are responsible for
implementing their solutions– Hardware and software patching solutions – Need to select which
solution to implement– Funding available now, affected agencies should begin implementation
immediately upon execution of IGA
Proposed Radio Steering Committee Assignments
Talk-group template development – Requesting initial Recommendations w/in 30 Days
Conventional resource prioritization and STARCOM21 port allocation
Policies (as identified)
Fire paging implementation
Training