DU:30047768 - Deakin Universitydro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30047768/cai-deformationand-2009.pdf ·...
Transcript of DU:30047768 - Deakin Universitydro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30047768/cai-deformationand-2009.pdf ·...
This is the published version Cai, Minghui, Ding, Hua, Zhang, Jiansu, Li, Long and Tang, Zhengyou 2009, Deformation and fracture characteristics of ferrite/bainite dual-phase steels, Cailiao yanjiu xuebao/Chinese journal of materials research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 83-88. Available from Deakin Research Online http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30047768 Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in Deakin Research Online. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact [email protected] Copyright: 2009, Zhongguo Kexueyuan Jinshu Yanjiusuo
� 23 � � 1 � Vol.23 No.1
2 0 0 9 � 2 � CHINESE JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH February 2 0 0 9
� � � � � �
���/�������� ��
��� 1 � � 1 ��� 2 � � 3 ��� 1
1. ����������� �� 110004
2. ������������ �� 201900
3. ����������� � 305–0047
� � ���� TMCP �, ����� ����� / � �� (FB ). � � FB ��
������� ���, ���: ��������Æ, FB ��������� n∗ ����� ε �������
� n∗ ����n∗ �� ε ������ n∗ �� ε ���� ��Æ. �� �� / � ����, ������ / �
���������� n∗ �����. FB ������������ ��� F–B �������� �, �
����� �����������, ������ ���.
� ! !��", �� / � ��, � �, ���, ���
"#$ TG142 %&'$ 1005-3093(2009)01-0083-06
Deformation and fracture characteristics of ferrite/bainitedual–phase steels
CAI Minghui1 DING Hua1∗ ZHANG Jiansu2 LI Long3 TANG Zhengyou1
1.School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 1100042.Technology Center, Baoshan Iron & Steel Group Co., Shanghai 201900
3.National Institute for Materials Science, Japan, Tsukuba 305–0047Manuscript received April 25, 2008; in revised form June 5, 2008.* To whom correspondence should be addressed, Tel:(024)83686458, E–mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT The deformation and fracture characteristics of a low carbon Si–Mn steel with fer-rite/bainite dual–phase structure were investigated by thermo–mechanical controlled process (TMCP).The results showed that the curves of the instantaneous work–hardening factor n∗ value versus true strainε are made up with three stages during uniform plastic deformation: n∗ value is relatively higher at stage�, decreases slowly with � in stage �, and then decreases quickly with ε in stage �. Compared tothe equiaxed ferrite/bainite dual–phase steel, the quasi–polygonal ferrite/bainite dual–phase steel showshigher tensile strength and n∗ value in the low strain region. The voids or micro–cracks formed not only atferrite–bainite interfaces but also within ferrite grains in the necked region, which can improve the propertyof resistance to crack propagation by reducing local stress concentration of the crack tips.
KEY WORDS metallic materials, ferrite/bainite dual–phase steel, uniaxial tension, deformation be-havior, fracture characteristics
��!" #��!"��������#$�
%$" &�!'�#%(�) !!, �� "#
(*"$&"�! (Advanced High Strength Steel,
AHSS) $%& [1,2]. '#%"&'(/'!(!
" (DP ) "�, &'(/$!(!" (FB )
#�"�!'(%)#"�), +)�"* &(#
*)#$%(,�%&'&'&+ +)(,#��
2008 ' 4 * 25 ())*,; 2008 ' 6 * 5 ()),�,.
+--�*: , *, .+
"�! -"/.�� [3].
� , -,/. FB "++#$&-01#0,1/0�� [4−8]. FB -..2#2,3"3
4�11#'$!("24 &++/535/".!�4 [4]; /015006621, 7786&'
(/$!( (FGBA/B) #�%("9:7;,$
<, ��#�)%( [5,6]; => [7,8] ��1�8
? FB "++#$&..2#3"<�+9, 1
0 Hollomon 83523 FB "@44:. 5;
.&$�89? &+ TMCP (Thermo–Mechanical
84 � � � � � � 23�84 � � � � � � 23�84 � � � � � � 23�
Control Process) 00:6#�2*7)/ .&'
('$!(++" FB , ��5-..2#3"4
)1#,8A#629B.2#73C<8D;<=
:7"=:&>:1#,&&;?<=>.
1 -./000# "%�%= (44=?, %)9: C 0.077,
Si 0.56, Mn 1.43, S 0.0027, P 0.0049, N 0.0038. #5
E@"9F9GAH6% 50 kg "6=, 7B8%>
?9 30 mm×100 mm×100 mm "��00:�. #
Gleeble–1500 �;<C@A00 -(@9 2 B/s
3" Ar3 9 735 B, # Thermo–calc =,DAA"
Ae3 9 848 B.
-��(>9:" φ450 mm�C?&+ TMCP
00, 5$;@3-B 1 /EA. @#C@AC8B
(>�,, DFDI(>C"@4'C(CE"+?JK<(>@!: &ÆG(>�L9 7–9 s; A&Æ
G(>�L9 2–3 s. EA:DFFG/H(=EF,
;<0IFGF3/"-HMGF3.
>-�"?HNGI22#73, # CMT5105
1 1 H@�JIAJBJCI
Fig.1 Schematic representation of laboratory simu-
lation of TMCP
6=CK<9DJ$00C, @45<�#$, 2#
@$9 3 mm/min. - LEICA Q550IWO"K=B3
?<2# "=?++, 8PE OLYCISBL=>=
,@4&'("KQ7R>?&KK""(L=?.
# SSX500 629B?<2#73>S")T, &
?LM?C<8,"D;':7"=:NU.
2 234562.1 789/:;9<=>?@
LB 2 5 VA, 1 M' 2 M73"��++FGH&'('$!( N%. 1 M73/&'(8M
MOM, N"!"MOI)J, FG92*7)&'
(,$!("(L=?K9 30.8%; 2M73/&'(
7R*N .J, $!("(L=?K9 21.2%. B
3 973"NP9B++, 2*7)&'(' .&
'()T=O-B 3a ' 3c /EA. B 3b ' 3d 2
1, 1 M' 2 M73/"$!(HPLK+"-2&
'(+%, &'(-2W!K9 0.5–1 μm, M$=O
%"$!(&'(-2$P"00 "�!'�#.
HB 2 5N, O�F!"4%@00 ++/&'(")TPF11K"4%. QO�F!
FRT(finish rolling temperature) 9 860B�, FRT "
P Ae3, 00 4)R-S!(Q7678<S!(
(=7678, ��X4):6"++QR')4$YL,#S, PF&'("4"R3<ZS, QT5
&'("Q�-O�A(>F3/>A".HP 1M
73K&ÆG(>@!Z[, -�"R4F!3, 8
SD";SF346H\, @)R"&'(JM&U
=VP, S4%"!MOI"2*7&'(. Q FRT
]9 770B�, �F4)8%1P4"4)H'".
!5/8, @&'("^8)RT]�, T�, F!F
(@)RR3<T#, )R@$U_?T, -EA"
(>F3/)%OS ."&'( [9].
1 2 WUUAVVUVJ�WAWFig.2 Microstructures of experimental steels with different finish rolling temperature. (a) 860 X
(sample 1); (b) 770 X (sample 2)
1 � YVBZ:XÆY/[WYZW�J\[WX`\] 851 � YVBZ:XÆY/[WYZW�J\[WX`\] 851 � YVBZ:XÆY/[WYZW�J\[WX`\] 85
1 3 H@�J TEM AWFig.3 TEM micrographs of the sample 1, quasi–polygonal ferrite (a) and bainitic ferrite laths (b),
sample 2, equiaxed ferrite(c) and bainitic ferrite laths (d)
2.2 FB CDEFGH>I?JKLB 4 5 VA, ' .&'(/$!(!"
"�, 2*7)&'(/$!(!" "�!Z",]
(#$�^]�.M^1'++/$!("(L=?�4%/, Y'&'(")T&=:�4. HP 1 M
73/$!("(L=?Z", X&'(�-Z�"
"4F!3)%", ^ Q73"�!Z", ]_#
a�]�. B 4 X21, b$&'()`" FB Q
#��"���, $3"< – "44:c�1K"
�1!<�1!#V, Z2a934"�11#. FB
"M$�11#'$!("24 &++/535/".!�4 [4].
-OYÆ-%)/, �%Y? n Z�&[\9
[G"%)_?. n ZP5 Z`4)Q\%�;,
4)8�d[e:"f(4Æ &TP\b4)_
? ,#. � , \aA# Hollomon 83-!.?
LIc/DA n Z, Q8]�^C��" n Z-4
)F3/9b?, S0I?*?��-Q\4)ÆG
" n Z8_b?. QT, Z@c#"T"8], X`
QGZadMTS6`" n Z"dZP. 9T, H
Hollomon 83eeAf�#$�%Y? n∗ Z"b
B, Z: n∗=(ε/σ)(dσ/dε), gh1 FB " n∗ ZE]
5"4 ε 4%"^4Og (B 5). B 5 21, -Q\
1 4 H@�JJf_h�_\]i
Fig.4 Engineering stress versus strain curves of FB
steel
_#4)ÆG, FB " n∗ ZE ε T#N`idS
^_,X n∗–ε4:P(5 =9`[ÆG:K�ÆG
n∗ ZZ"; K�ÆG n∗ ZE ε T#SH\3]; K
�ÆG n∗ ZE ε T#Sj@3].
��" n∗ ZE] ε"4%1#'5++6N1a.a"4. K&ÆG" n∗ ZZ", '$!(bd
"535/@&'(GFQ\4)�4 [10]. -"4
4ZS�, 5/"c3FG KMcd9F, 5/�
%C<eFe. T�, &'(!$PF_#4), $
86 � � � � � � 23�86 � � � � � � 23�86 � � � � � � 23�
1 5 H@�Jf_hWkbgdhl�_\Jem
Fig.5 True stress and instantaneous n–value versus
true strain curves of FB steel
!(i�g#4),hc-b"8R2aA&i"_
#"4M"d,@"8Mfj"&'(/5/eLj
6. $!("24j*, 5/.!j", n∗ ZXkj
P. B 5 X21, �"48 1 M73" n∗ ZPP 2
M73. E]"44"T#, )4++/eL"5/5$-/#"<,#3kFkl, @$!(GF&i
"_#4), 5@2#4)/GF"f("<g/6
`nm, @b"%L""4MoD#]�, LSeL
n∗ ZE"4"T#SH\3]. K�ÆG" n∗ Zj
@3]5$'&'(&&;4)GFlcd &P
(="$!(GF�1�4.
2.3 FB CDEFGH>MNJKB 6 9 1 M' 2 M73"2#>S)T. 5
VA, 1 M' 2 M73">SQ9(#>S, �pN
.<fq:J. 1 M73/&'(FG92*7)
&'( (B 2a), Rodrigues g9 [11], 2*7)&
'(�H;SK<""4Gq, _#Z(. -:7;
,F3/,�!Z�"2*7)&'(-:7hif
j"<n,#3GFZP"_#4),d[1"<g
/, P"19o#>:$<. .P 2 M73, P(=
&'(9 .J,X7R>?OS (B 2b). Q:7k
F78;,�, 7RlO, 78l*, :7;,F3/
h4"p?l*, ;,^r"$4lP, �"�#
l( [12].
-73"C<8,, )%1Z*"D;'=:7
(B 7), FGGF-&'(,< F–B "8Mfj. DP
-2#>:"C<F3/,D;<=:7FGGF
- F–M < M–M "8Mfj [13,14], 59:7;,$
<ZdFG':7>b"8M#q�4. ]�, $!
(si<(=Gr DP /"'!(, Z)% FB
< F+B+M j" , ��#�k("�#. M�HP
1 6 H@�mjlJXnklmm
Fig.6 Fracture surface of the samples, (a) sample 1, (b) sample 2
1 7 mjXnnnosJklmm
Fig.7 Fracture surface of the samples, (a) sample 1, (b) sample 2
1 � YVBZ:XÆY/[WYZW�J\[WX`\] 871 � YVBZ:XÆY/[WYZW�J\[WX`\] 871 � YVBZ:XÆY/[WYZW�J\[WX`\] 87
#$!(rt'!(, @�"'="%L"�!�d
[, �EPmp�""�#, 8@b"%L"4)Z
9oD. Z&'(GFZP_#4)"T�, $!(
X�&i"�1, LSd[1b"8MGFD;<=
:7"n$. o/, HP&'(�=", QD;<=:
7GF-&'(,�, �!Z�"&'(-"<n"
,#3GFZP"_#4),dq1:7fj"f(
"<g/, LSOo:7;,, mp1 �"_#&
9:7;,#$.
p?^3, �89? FB #�%("4) &
>:�#, '++/&'(")`�>?�(L=? &$!(")T'=:o�.a4c. HPS!(
H$!("4�GF"(Lrq@&'(/535
/".!Z", ��%"$!(&'(-2 &6)
%(" F–B 8M oeL FB "�s#$�%$
T", @=D"GF'pgPFqÆ, et<C"P
F. -_#4)"0sÆG, �)O"�! (HSLA
) " n∗ ZK9 0.2, DP " n∗ Z9 0.3 Pr, S
FB " n∗ Z"u 0.45 Pr [15]. Z' HSLA
' DP "�, FB -�"48#�1K""#$
�%Z, M$st#$�%+9�APP"��-%
)F3/"4=�"Q\#,po%)F3/stq
Z'Qt"PF. o/, vu Ashby–Mileiko p)4
)/r [10], 91P" FB �sÆG" n∗ Z, "T
#$!("(L=?<O%$!(&'(-2>?.
]�$!("(L=?F", `@Q\(#3], %
)#$r%; 91P" FB "�#, "P"5Q\
(#, Z]�$!("(L=?, <S$!('&'
(b"%L"�!�. QT, 91:6p)#$%(
" FB , "stmp�s#$�%@$&Q\(#
b8M"sTQ',.�AP vSMAPAv<"
t"Q'# b<. 5FGuuwv: (1) 91P"
&'(""�!,-F1/."&'('$!(24
�" P3, uQP"K&ÆG"C(@!, dS
&'("7R>?; (2) DFT#uv�%w' (w
Si�Nb ) "24 JP"&'("�!; (3) )/
K<KKÆG"C(@!&MGF!,<x@$!(
++Q\�=O%, APP"�s#$�%@$'
Q\(#.
3 2 6
1. QO�F! FRT a"P Ae3(860 B) �,
FB "++FGH2*7)&'(/$!(+%, Q
FRT ]= Ae3 ' Ar3 %L� (770 B), FGH .
&'(/$!(+%. #�2*7)&'(/$!(++"!" �Z""�!'�sf��%Y?.
2. -Q\_#4)ÆG, FB "f�#$�%
Y? n∗ Z'5"4 ε "4c4:5=9`[ÆG:
K�ÆG n∗ ZZ"; K�ÆG n∗ ZE] ε "T#
SH\3]; K�ÆG n∗ ZE] ε "T#Sj@3
]. ' HSLA ' DP "�, FB -�"48#
�1K""#$�%Z.
3. -2#>:"C<F3/, FB /"D;<
=:7*GF-&'(,< F–B "8Mfj. �!
Z�"&'(-"<n",#3GFZP"_#4), �APdq:7fj"f("<g/, P" �
"9:7;,$<.
R S % T
1 A.Kumar, S.B.Singh, K.K.Ray, Influence of
bainite/martensite–content on the tensile properties
of low carbon dual–phase steels, Materials Science
Engineering A, 474, 270(2008)
2 KANG Yonglin, Quality Controlling and Forming Prop-
erty of Modern Automobile Steel Plates (Beijing, The
Press of Metallurgical Industry, 1999) p.129
(wxx, UVWXYZ[\]^_`ab (xy, Æ!�yyzy, 1999) p.129)
3 M.Takahashi, Development of high strength steels for au-
tomobiles, Nippon Steel Technical Report, 88, 3(2003)
4 A.Barbacki, The role of bainite in shaping mechanical
properties of bainite, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, 53, 57(1995)
5 XU Pingguang, FANG Hongsheng, BAI Bingzhe, WANG
Zhenjia, YANG Zhigang, HUANG Jinfeng, New duplex
microstructure of grain boundary allotriomorphic ferrite/
granular bainite, Journal of Iron and Steel Research Inter-
national, 9(2), 33(2002)
6 XU Pingguang, BAI Bingzhe, FANG Hongsheng, WANG
Zhenjia, WANG Jianping, PAN Yongkun, Development
of grain boundary allotriomorphic ferrite/granular bainite
duplex steel, Journal of University of Science and Tech-
nology Beijing, 10(2), 39(2003)
7 LI Long, DING Hua, DU Linxiu, SONG Hongmei,
ZHENG Fang, Microstructures and mechanical property
of low carbon manganese steel with grain boundary al-
lotriomorphic ferrite/bainite structure, Acta Metallurgica
Sinica, 42(11), 1227(2006)
(z {, , *, vxv, ww|, z x, y}�x�� / � ��c{��y��, !�y{, 42(11), 1227(2006))
8 LI Long, DING Hua, WEN Jinglin, SONG Hongmei,
ZHANG Pijun, Mechanical behaviors of a low carbon steel
with a duplex microstructure of bainite and ferrite, Chi-
nese Journal of Materials Research, 21(5), 517(2007)
(z {, , *, z~x, ww|, |d�, �� / � z�c{���y��, �"� y{, 21(5), 517(2007))
88 � � � � � � 23�88 � � � � � � 23�88 � � � � � � 23�
9 XU Yunbo, YU Yongmei, WU Di, WANG Guodong,
Mathematical model of ferrite transformation of Nb mi-
croslloyed steels through low temperature heavy defor-
mation, Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 20(2),
131(2006)
({}|, �x|, | }, }{|, z�� Nb �}!�� ����yzx, �"� y{, 20(2), 131(2006))
10 MA Mingtu, Dual–Phase Steels–Metallurgy of Physics
and Mechanics (Beijing, The Press of Metallurgical In-
dustry, 1988) p.137
(�{~, efg – hijklmn (xy, Æ!�yyzy,
1988) p.137)
11 P.C.M.Rodrigues, E V.Pereloma, D.B.Santos, Mechanical
prosperities of an HSLA bainitic steel subjected to con-
trolled rolling with accelerated cooling, Materials Science
Engineering A, 283, 136(2000)
12 QIAN Zhiping, Deformation and Fracture of Materials
(Shanghai, The Press of Tongji University, 1989) p.270
(|~}, opZqa_rs (~~, �~yyzy, 1989)
p.270)
13 M.Erdogan, The effect of new ferrite content on the tensile
fracture behavior of dual phase steels, Journal of Materials
Science, 37, 3623(2002)
14 K.Hasegawa, K.Kawamura, T.Urabe, Y.Hosoya, Effects of
microstructure on stretch–flange–formability of 980 MPa
grade cold–rolled ultra high strength steel sheets, ISIJ In-
ternational, 44(3), 603(2004)
15 M.F.Shi, SUN Zhongming, Comparing moulding proper-
ties between dual–phase steel and HSLA steel, The World
Iron & Steel, 4, 18(2002)
(M.F.Shi, ��, ���}!����������,
���, 4, 18(2002))