DSA Supplementary Questionnaire Initial analysis and observations.
-
Upload
tracy-williamson -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
4
Transcript of DSA Supplementary Questionnaire Initial analysis and observations.
DSA Supplementary Questionnaire
Initial analysis and observations
Purpose
DSA assesses e-maturity on a broad basis
Supplemented by:
• 72 questions dealing with specifics of “e-activity”
• 4 open-response questions
Coverage of questionnaire
• Inputs from JISC, SFEU, COLEG
• Agreement with SFC
– Infrastructure– Teaching & Learning– Organisation– Strategic Leadership– Subject-specific adoption of e-learning
Methodology
• Included as part of the DSA Workbook issued to colleges
• Available on-line for individual practitioners
• Latter targeted through JISC, SFEU and COLEG networks
Outcomes
• 36 colleges completed as part of DSA
• 59 individual practitioner responses
But
• Only 3 responses to open questions from individuals
Area ratings (high to low)
• B Infrastructure: Services and Organisation• A Infrastructure: Technology• F Organisation: Staff Development• C Teaching and Learning: Resources• I Strategic Leadership• H Organisation: Quality Assurance• J Individual Subject Area• D Teaching and Learning: On-line
assessment• G Organisation: Financial Management• E Teaching and Learning: Pedagogy
Questions
J1. Extent of use of e-
learning in the subject area
J2. Extent of use of e-learning
across the awarding
levels (e.g. NC, HN)
J3. Extent of use of e-learning across
learner types (e.g. age, disability,
ESOL)
J4. Extent of use of e-learning in employer facing
delivery (e.g. Work based
learning)
COLLEGES
Very Good 0 2 3 0
Good 10 10 10 6OK 14 10 12 11
Poor 10 14 11 17
Not known 2 0 0 2
Total (36 colleges)
36 36 36 36
INDIVIDUALS
Very Good10 6 7 4
Good 11 9 10 2OK 21 20 15 7
Poor 9 13 13 10
Not known8 11 14 36
Total (59 responses)
59 59 59 59
E-learning coverage in specific subjects
Questions
E1. Effective learner use of VLE
E2. Effective learner
use of e-Portfolio
s
E3. Provision
of on-line tutor support for e-
learners
E4. Provision
of technical support for e-
learners (e.g.
online / help
desk / local
technician)
E5. Adoption
of diverse media
for learning content
and activity
(e.g. Game based
learning, pod
casting, IPTV
services)
E6. Adoption
of collabor
ative online activity
(e.g. email lists,
discussion forums,
blogs, wikis)
E7. Use of
mobile access devices
in personal learning
(e.g. PDAs,
phones, MP3
players)
COLLEGES
Very Good
4 0 6 3 0 0 0
Good 11 6 6 12 6 9 3OK 16 7 11 13 12 10 5
Poor 5 21 12 7 14 17 28Not
known0 2 1 1 4 0 0
Total (36 colleges)
36 36 36 36 36 36 36
INDIVIDUALS
Very Good 12 0 9 6 1 5 0Good 14 3 10 14 6 15 6
OK 10 7 6 10 12 13 3Poor 14 17 19 16 21 16 32
Not known 9 32 15 13 19 10 18
Total (59 response
s) 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Element % of respondents scoring as Very Good
B6. Effectiveness of library & resource centre support 43% B5. Availability of library & resource centre support when required 46% A1. Adequacy of bandwidth to access the internet 60% A2. Adequacy of internal campus network performance 44% A9. Access to externally hosted online content 31% A7. Capability to upload content to learning support platform (e.g. VLE or repository)
35%
B3. Effectiveness of operational IT support 29% A3. Adequacy of network performance between college sites (campuses, annexes)
25%
B9. Onsite facilities for personal e-learning (e.g. in LRC, drop in centres, annexes)
23%
B2. Availability of operational support when required through IT support staff
23%
Highest scoring elements (highest first)
Element % of respondents scoring as Poor
E7. Use of mobile access devices in personal learning (e.g. PDAs, phones, MP3 players)
64%
E2. Effective learner use of e-Portfolios 40% E5. Adoption of diverse media for learning content and activity (e.g. Game based learning, pod casting, IPTV services)
37%
D2. Use of externally provided online question banks or formative test instruments (e.g. COLA)
42%
B10. Effectiveness of the college website in promoting e-learning options 39% A12. Access to video conferencing facilities for distance meetings or classes
35%
F1. Take up of e-enabled learning beyond the enthusiasts 35% D1. Availability of directly relevant online e-assessment instruments 33% A10. Access to resources using privately owned laptop whilst in college 46% J4. Extent of use of e-learning in employer facing delivery (e.g. Work based learning)
28%
Lowest scoring elements (lowest first)
Elements that individuals scored more highly than college
• A4. Access to data projection or electronic whiteboards for class teaching
• D8. Credibility of online summative assessment approach
• E6. Adoption of collaborative online activity (e.g. email lists, discussion forums, blogs, wikis)
• F5. Value of self-help networks (e.g. SFEU Communities of Practice)
• J1. Extent of use of e-learning in the subject area
Elements that college scored more highly than individuals
• B4. College risk assessment & contingency planning to address major IT failure
• F4. Value of external advice and support in helping take on e-enabled learning (e.g. JISC RSCs, SFEU)
• G2. Affordability of licensing the necessary software tools (e.g. VLE, assessment tools, authoring tools)
Your hopes• Most comments about embedding or
funding/resources
• Losing the “e-”
“A strategic, management led initiative that results in staff embracing the widely available
technology and results in more resources being developed either by staff individually or
supported centrally in order to enhance the student experience.”
Good Practice
• SFC Transformation projects– BlendEd– E-Construction
• Use of ICT Learning & Teaching champions / advisers/ learning technologies
• CISCO CCNA on-line• SQA Internet Security e-enabled Unit• BA Child & Youth Studies (networked)
Biggest Challenge
• Funding
• Staff time (for development)
• Staff attitudes
• Culture and ethos
• Learning technology support
• Policies to support e-learning
Most significant change
• Moving e-learning from enthusiasts to mainstream
• National banks of materials and assessments
• Change in approach/attitude of awarding bodies
• Consistent style/approach for all developments
Walter Patterson
SERO