Dr. V. K. SETHI Prof. & Head RGPV Bhopal CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE POWER DEVELOPMENT.
-
Upload
bernard-cobb -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Dr. V. K. SETHI Prof. & Head RGPV Bhopal CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE POWER DEVELOPMENT.
Dr. V. K. SETHI
Prof. & Head
RGPV
Bhopal
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE POWER DEVELOPMENTSUSTAINABLE POWER DEVELOPMENT
PRIORITIES ON ENERGY GENERATION SECTOR:PRIORITIES ON ENERGY GENERATION SECTOR: Increased use of Advanced Fossil Fuel Technology.Increased use of Advanced Fossil Fuel Technology.
Promote CCT in countries where coal is main stay Promote CCT in countries where coal is main stay fuel for Power Generation.fuel for Power Generation.
Reduce Atmospheric Pollution from Energy Reduce Atmospheric Pollution from Energy Generating Systems.Generating Systems.
Enhance productivity through Advanced Fossil Fuel Enhance productivity through Advanced Fossil Fuel Technology.Technology.
WORLD SUMMIT ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
POWER SCENARIO IN INDIAPOWER SCENARIO IN INDIA
Installed capacity in utilities (March 31, 2002)Installed capacity in utilities (March 31, 2002)
ThermalThermal 73,274 mw73,274 mw HydroHydro 25,574 mw25,574 mw NuclearNuclear 2,860 mw 2,860 mw WindWind 1,427 mw 1,427 mw TotalTotal 1,03,135 mw 1,03,135 mw
Total energy generation - 383 billion kwhTotal energy generation - 383 billion kwh Per Capita Energy Consumption -400 kwhPer Capita Energy Consumption -400 kwh
DEMAND PROJECTIONDEMAND PROJECTION
YEAR 2012 CAPACITY ADDITION BY SECTORSYEAR 2012 CAPACITY ADDITION BY SECTORS CentralCentral 46,500 MW46,500 MW State & IPPState & IPP 41,800 MW41,800 MW NCESNCES 10,700 MW10,700 MW NuclearNuclear 6,400 MW6,400 MW TotalTotal 105,400 MW105,400 MW
YEAR 2020 MIX OF GENERATIONYEAR 2020 MIX OF GENERATION ThermalThermal 326,000MW326,000MW Renewable & Hydro Renewable & Hydro 104,000 MW104,000 MW NuclearNuclear 20,000 MW20,000 MW TotalTotal 450,000 MW450,000 MW
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIESCLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES
MiningMining Management & Practices Management & Practices (Reduction of Extraneous (Reduction of Extraneous material)material)
Coal PreparationCoal Preparation Process after mining to improve Process after mining to improve inherent & Extraneous material inherent & Extraneous material (washing & beneficiation)(washing & beneficiation)
Conversion TechnologiesConversion Technologies Supercritical, PFBC and IGCCSupercritical, PFBC and IGCC
Post combustion cleaningPost combustion cleaning Particulate and gaseous Particulate and gaseous pollutants removal pollutants removal (Environmental requirement)(Environmental requirement)
VISION 2020
PROGRAM
Post combustion Clean-up-Desulfurization
(FGC systems) Supercritical
In-combustion Clean-up Fluidized bed
combustion (CFBC, PFBC, AFBC)
Gasification using + fluidized bed, moving bed or Entrained bed Gasifiers
Pre combustion Clean-up beneficiation/washing
Technologies for utilization of Coal for Power Generation with minimal pollutants discharged to the atmosphere (Reduced CO2, Sox, Nox, SPM) at high conversion efficiency……….World Coal Institute.
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES
CLEAN COAL CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIESTECHNOLOGIES
Clean Coal Technologies Clean Coal Technologies (CCTs) are defined as (CCTs) are defined as ‘technologies designed to ‘technologies designed to enhance: enhance:
Efficiency of conversionEfficiency of conversion
Environmental Environmental acceptability of coal acceptability of coal extraction, preparation and extraction, preparation and use. use.
COAL FOR POWER COAL FOR POWER GENERATIONGENERATION
China and India are projected to China and India are projected to account for30% of the world’s account for30% of the world’s increase in energy consumption increase in energy consumption between 2000-2020 and 92% of between 2000-2020 and 92% of increase in coal use.increase in coal use.
The key environmental challenges The key environmental challenges facing the coal industry are related to facing the coal industry are related to ::
Coal MiningCoal MiningParticulate emissionParticulate emissionDisturbance land meDisturbance land meAcid rainAcid rainOzone and Waste disposalOzone and Waste disposal
INDIA AMONGST TOP INDIA AMONGST TOP SIX EMITTERS OF CO2SIX EMITTERS OF CO2
Country Country Total emission Total emission Percentage ofPercentage of
(Million Tonnes of CO2) (Million Tonnes of CO2) world world emissionemission
USAUSA 54705470 24%24%
China China 3121312114%14%
Russian FederationRussian Federation14561456 6%6%
Japan Japan 11731173 5%5%
GermanyGermany 884884 4%4%
India India 881881 4%4%
Note : Green House Note : Green House inventory for India for inventory for India for Energy Sector (Million Energy Sector (Million
Tonnes of COTonnes of CO22) ) Energy Sector Energy Sector CO2CO2 CO2 CO2 equivalentequivalent
(CO2+CH4+NOx)(CO2+CH4+NOx)
Total EmissionTotal Emission 508 508 565 565
(58% of total)(58% of total) (64% of (64% of total)total)
Source : IAE : 1999Source : IAE : 1999
PER CAPITA EMISSIONS OF COPER CAPITA EMISSIONS OF CO22
Top 6 PollutersTop 6 Polluters
World Developed countriesParties(Tonnes of CO2 percapita)
Developing Countries
(Tonnes of CO2 percapita)
Qatar 44.08Bahrain 35.23UAE 30.11Kuwait 25.01Singapore 23.47U.S.A 20.50
USA 20.50Luxemboury 20.42Australia 16.52Canada 15.76Finland 12.47Estonia 12.47
Qatar 44.08Bahrain 35.23U.A.E. 30.11Kuwait 25.01Singapore 23.47Saudi Arabia 13.27
Note : Per capita CO2 equivalent emissions for India in 1990 are estimated to be1.194 tonnes or 325 kg of Carbon per capita. This contribution 58% of NationalEmissions and 4% of global emission.
Source : IEA 1999 & UNDP 1998.
COSTCOST OF VARIOUSOF VARIOUS CO2 CO2 MITIGATION OPTIONS FOR MITIGATION OPTIONS FOR INDIAN POWER SECTORINDIAN POWER SECTOR
PotentialTechnologies
1. Co-generation2. Combined Cycle3. PFBC4. IGCC5. Supercritical6. Coal Washing
Green housegas emissionreduction (kg/kWh)
1.500.960.180.230.180.125
COST (Rs/Tonnes CO2).
48026002400016000160008500Source: ADP 1998
Zero Emission Zero Emission Technology (ZET)Technology (ZET)
This technology combines and forms a This technology combines and forms a part of :part of :
Clean Coal TechnologiesClean Coal Technologies Solid to liquid fuel technologySolid to liquid fuel technology GHG mitigation technologyGHG mitigation technology Clean Development Mechanism for power Clean Development Mechanism for power
sectorsector Non-CFC Refrigerant and Non-CFC Aerosol Non-CFC Refrigerant and Non-CFC Aerosol
Propellant TechnologyPropellant Technology Clean Aviation Fuel or ATF for aircraftClean Aviation Fuel or ATF for aircraft Substitute LPG for domestic use.Substitute LPG for domestic use.
Measures to achieve Measures to achieve Sustainable Sustainable
DevelopmentDevelopment Promoting CCTs, including Promoting CCTs, including carbon sequestration is essential carbon sequestration is essential to a balanced cost effective climate to a balanced cost effective climate change response change response
Developing countries where coal Developing countries where coal combustion efficiencies are low combustion efficiencies are low CCT promotion a need of the day.CCT promotion a need of the day.
EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT FORECASTCONVENTIONAL Vs IGCC ( Courtesy BHEL)
60
55
50
45
40
35
301990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Year of commercial use
Net
The
rma
l Effi
cie
ncy
(%)
Ceramic gasturbine
566 Co 600 Co623 Co
1300 Co 1500 Co
540 Co
650 Co1184 Co
IGCC (15 C Amb)
IGCC (Indian Condition)
Super Critical PC Power Plant (15 C Amb.)o
Super Critical PC Power Plant (Indian Condition)o
Sub Critical PC Power Plant (Indian Condition)
570
256
384380
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
CO2
MM
T
2.84.3
10
6.6
0
5
10
15
SO2
MM
T
85
128
13.3 20
0
50
100
150
ASH
MM
T No Change Scenario
Specific Coal Consumption
=0.75 KG/KWH
Coal
Ash : 43%
Sulphur : 0.6%
Ideal Scenario
Specific Coal Consumption
=0.35 KG/KWH
Coal
Ash : 15%
Sulphur : 3%
POLLUTANT GENERATION FROM PC PLANTS
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
SOx NOx Particulates0
102030405060708090
100110120
PE
RC
EN
TAG
E O
F P
C P
LAN
TS
PC
IGCC
PFBC
PC+FGD
RELATIVE EMMISSION
SUPER CRITICAL UNITSSUPER CRITICAL UNITS
Standardized Unit Size 660 MW, 246 ata, 537 Standardized Unit Size 660 MW, 246 ata, 537 ooCC Station Size 2x660 MW (Minimum)Station Size 2x660 MW (Minimum) Common Off site facilityCommon Off site facility FW Temperature 270 FW Temperature 270 ooC – 275 C – 275 ooC with 6 Heaters.C with 6 Heaters.
Total Capacity Planned Total Capacity Planned 14,560 MW 14,560 MW **
Number of UnitsNumber of Units 22 Units22 Units
** Includes 6x720 MW and 2x500 MW Imported sets.Includes 6x720 MW and 2x500 MW Imported sets.
Main advantages ofMain advantages ofSuper-Critical Steam CycleSuper-Critical Steam Cycle
Reduced fuel cost due to improved thermal Reduced fuel cost due to improved thermal
efficiencyefficiency
Reduction of COReduction of CO22 emissions by 15% per unit of emissions by 15% per unit of
Power generated compared to sub-criticalPower generated compared to sub-critical
Very good part load efficienciesVery good part load efficiencies
Plant costs are comparable with sub-critical unitsPlant costs are comparable with sub-critical units
Current State-of-ArtCurrent State-of-Art
Super-critical Steam Power Generation PlantsSuper-critical Steam Power Generation Plants
PressurePressure -- 300 bar300 bar
TemperatureTemperature -- 600600ooCC
EfficiencyEfficiency -- 45% (LHV Basis)45% (LHV Basis)
Nickel based alloys allows up 650Nickel based alloys allows up 650ooCC
By the year 2005By the year 2005 -- 620620 o oCC
By the year 2020By the year 2020 -- 650-700650-700 o oCC
Cycle EfficiencyCycle Efficiency -- 50-55%50-55%
R&D IN R&D IN SUPERCRITICAL SUPERCRITICAL TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY
Main Thrust Areas :Main Thrust Areas : Materials & Metallurgy for components Materials & Metallurgy for components of boiler & of boiler & turbine subjected to high turbine subjected to high temperature and high temperature and high pressure.pressure. Supercritical cycle optimization -Supercritical cycle optimization -incremental heat rate incremental heat rate improvementimprovement Retrofit of supercritical boiler to Retrofit of supercritical boiler to subcritical PC boilersubcritical PC boiler Fluidized bed supercritical steam cyclesFluidized bed supercritical steam cycles Once through HRSGs with supercritical Once through HRSGs with supercritical parametersparameters Multi-reheat supercritical boilers with Multi-reheat supercritical boilers with double/triple double/triple reheater.reheater.
EXPECTED BENEFITS: EXPECTED BENEFITS:
Coal SavingCoal Saving 1,565,2001,565,200 TonnesTonnes
Co2 Emission ReductionCo2 Emission Reduction 1,909,5441,909,544 ” ”
SO2 Emission ReductionSO2 Emission Reduction 11,648 11,648 ” ”
Ash ReductionAsh Reduction 661,752 661,752 ” ”
SUPER CRITICAL SCENARIOSUPER CRITICAL SCENARIO
COAL BASED COMBINED CYCLE PLANTCOAL BASED COMBINED CYCLE PLANT
RoutesRoutes
CombustionCombustion GasificationGasification
Hot Flue gas under pressure Hot Flue gas under pressure drives the G.T.drives the G.T.
Pressurized gasification Pressurized gasification process produces fuel for process produces fuel for G.T.G.T.
PressurizedPressurized
Fluidized – BEDFluidized – BED
Combustor (PFBC)Combustor (PFBC)
Options AvailableOptions Available Moving – BEDMoving – BED Fluidized – BEDFluidized – BED Entrained – BEDEntrained – BED
COAL BASEDCOAL BASEDCOMBINED CYCLE POWER GENERATIONCOMBINED CYCLE POWER GENERATION
Offers Plant efficiency over 44% with advanced GTOffers Plant efficiency over 44% with advanced GT
Has Lower emission of gaseous and solid pollutantsHas Lower emission of gaseous and solid pollutants
Accept Inferior and varying quality of coalsAccept Inferior and varying quality of coals
Lower water requirementLower water requirement
Capability of phased construction and retrofittingCapability of phased construction and retrofitting
IGCC TECHNOLOGY ...IGCC TECHNOLOGY ...
Gasification of coal is the cleanest way of Gasification of coal is the cleanest way of utilization of coal, while combined cycle power utilization of coal, while combined cycle power generation gives the highest efficiency.generation gives the highest efficiency.
Integration of these two technologies in IGCC Integration of these two technologies in IGCC power generation offers the benefits of very low power generation offers the benefits of very low emissions and efficiencies of the order of 44-emissions and efficiencies of the order of 44-48%.48%.
The comparative indices show that in case of The comparative indices show that in case of IGCC, emission of particulate, NOx and SOx are: IGCC, emission of particulate, NOx and SOx are:
7.1%, 20% and 16%, respectively, of 7.1%, 20% and 16%, respectively, of the the corresponding emissions from corresponding emissions from PC plant. PC plant.
IGCC ...IGCC ... Environmental performance of IGCC plants Environmental performance of IGCC plants
far exceeds that of conventional and even far exceeds that of conventional and even supercritical plants.supercritical plants.
Three major areas of technology that will Three major areas of technology that will contribute to improvements in IGCC are :contribute to improvements in IGCC are :
hot gas de-sulfurisationhot gas de-sulfurisation hot gas particulate removal hot gas particulate removal advanced turbine systemsadvanced turbine systems
DEVELOPMENTAL GOALS FOR IGCCDEVELOPMENTAL GOALS FOR IGCC
To utilize India’s low grade coal for power generation To utilize India’s low grade coal for power generation with improved plant efficiency.with improved plant efficiency.
To introduce coal gas in Natural Gas based Combined To introduce coal gas in Natural Gas based Combined Cycle Plants in a phased manner.Cycle Plants in a phased manner.
To increase power generation capacity at the level of To increase power generation capacity at the level of present emission.present emission.
To develop state of Art Technology for Indigenous and To develop state of Art Technology for Indigenous and Export Markets.Export Markets.
Gasifier
Raw Gas Cooler
CombustionChamber
Comp. Turb.
Alternator
Air
COAL
Ash
Exhaust Gases
Condenser
WHB
Alternator
ST
Air
Fuel
Steam
Gas Clean Up
Booster
Steam
IGCC
IGCC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN INDIAIGCC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN INDIA
MAJOR MILE STONES:MAJOR MILE STONES:
Choice of gasification for high ash coals by BHELChoice of gasification for high ash coals by BHEL
6.2 MW IGCC demonstration plant established by BHEL both with 6.2 MW IGCC demonstration plant established by BHEL both with
Moving Bed and Fluidized Bed.Moving Bed and Fluidized Bed.
Coal Characterization by BHEL & IICT for gasification application.Coal Characterization by BHEL & IICT for gasification application.
Intensive data generated by IICT on oxygen-steam gasification in their Intensive data generated by IICT on oxygen-steam gasification in their
Moving Bed gasifier.Moving Bed gasifier.
Task force CEA, CSIR, NTPC & BHEL constituted to assess Task force CEA, CSIR, NTPC & BHEL constituted to assess
technological maturity & Financial requirement for a green field IGCC technological maturity & Financial requirement for a green field IGCC
plant of 100 MW capacity at Dadri (NTPC).plant of 100 MW capacity at Dadri (NTPC).
BHEL, CSIR & NTPC prepared proposal for setting up of this 100 MW BHEL, CSIR & NTPC prepared proposal for setting up of this 100 MW
IGCC demonstration plant.IGCC demonstration plant.
Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) technology has selectively (CFBC) technology has selectively been applied in India for firing high been applied in India for firing high sulphur refinery residues, lignite, etc.sulphur refinery residues, lignite, etc.
CFBC Technology is superior to PC CFBC Technology is superior to PC Power Plant Technology:Power Plant Technology:
Lower NOx formation and the ability Lower NOx formation and the ability to capture SOto capture SO22 with limestone with limestone injection the furnace.injection the furnace.
Circulating fluidized Bed Combustion
Good combustion efficiencies Good combustion efficiencies comparable to PC Power Plants.comparable to PC Power Plants.
The heat transfer coefficient of the CFB The heat transfer coefficient of the CFB furnace is nearly double that of PC which furnace is nearly double that of PC which makes the furnace compact.makes the furnace compact.
Fuel Flexibility:Fuel Flexibility: The CFB can handle a The CFB can handle a wide range of fuels such as inferior coal, wide range of fuels such as inferior coal, washery rejects, lignite, anthracite, washery rejects, lignite, anthracite, petroleum coke and agricultural waste petroleum coke and agricultural waste with lower heating.with lower heating.
Circulating fluidized Bed Combustion
Steam to Super Heater
Cyclone
FurnaceCoal FeedHopper
Ash Cooler
Back-Pass
ESP
ExternalHeat-Exchanger
HP Air
Circulating Fluidised Bed Boiler
CFBC Vs Other Clean CFBC Vs Other Clean Coal TechnologiesCoal Technologies
At present pulverized fuel firing with FGD are At present pulverized fuel firing with FGD are less costly than prevailing IGCC technology. less costly than prevailing IGCC technology. However, firing in CFB Boiler is still more However, firing in CFB Boiler is still more economical when using high sulfur lignite economical when using high sulfur lignite and low-grade coals and rejects.and low-grade coals and rejects.
0.8-0.980.8-0.981.491.491.01.0Relative O&M Relative O&M Cost/kWCost/kW
1.15-1.15-1.421.421.03-1.191.03-1.191.01.0Relative Capital Relative Capital
Cost/kWCost/kW
41-4241-4236.736.734.834.8Cycle Eff. %Cycle Eff. %
IGCCIGCCPF+FGD/PF+FGD/SCRSCRCFBCCFBCITEMITEM
Renovation & Modernization (R&M) and Renovation & Modernization (R&M) and Life Extension (LE) of old power plants is Life Extension (LE) of old power plants is a cost-effective option as compared to a cost-effective option as compared to adding up green field plant capacities.adding up green field plant capacities.
Growing environmental regulations would Growing environmental regulations would force many utilities within the country to force many utilities within the country to go for revamping these polluting old go for revamping these polluting old power plants using environmentally power plants using environmentally benign CFBC technology.benign CFBC technology.
Sustainable Power Development calls for adoption of Clean Coal Technologies like Supercritical cycles, IGCC and FBC technologies
Supercritical Power technologies may selectively be used for Pit Head power generation using washed coal
SUMMERY
IGCC can revolutionize the power IGCC can revolutionize the power generation scenario in India, once the generation scenario in India, once the commercial viability of technology with commercial viability of technology with high ash coals is established at the high ash coals is established at the proposed 100 MW plant. proposed 100 MW plant.
The success of the project will largely The success of the project will largely depend on maturity of Fluidized bed depend on maturity of Fluidized bed gasification technology for high ash gasification technology for high ash Indian Coals.Indian Coals.
CFBC technologies are particularly useful CFBC technologies are particularly useful for Boiler Emission reduction through for Boiler Emission reduction through revamping of old polluting plants.revamping of old polluting plants.
SUMMERY