Dr. Darrell D. Massie, P.E. - canadian-german-mining.com · The IPERC Difference – Distributed...

10
Dr. Darrell D. Massie, P.E. Mining & Renewables Breakfast Seminar 6 February 2015

Transcript of Dr. Darrell D. Massie, P.E. - canadian-german-mining.com · The IPERC Difference – Distributed...

Dr. Darrell D. Massie, P.E. Mining & Renewables Breakfast Seminar 6 February 2015

Tactical & Remote Power

2

US DOD/DOE/DHS SPIDERS Project

3

Increased Energy Surety – Highly reliable power delivery – Cyber secure to protect against increasing attacks – Reduce dependency on single energy source when islanded (integrate

renewable and other distributed generation ) – Mitigate rising energy costs, volatile fuel prices and insecure supplies – Reduce carbon footprint; emissions and greenhouse gasses – Utility grid connected or islanded – Improve relationships with local communities – Suitable for increasing remote (off-grid) projects

SPIDERS Phased Approach

4

2.4MW microgrid built around wastewater treatment plant Completed January 2013

5.4MW microgrid built around mission-critical base command centers Completed October 2013

SPIDERS I – Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, HI (7% PV)

5.0MW microgrid encompassing entire Navy Pacific Command base Completion Summer 2015

SPIDERS II – Fort Carson, CO (40% PV)

SPIDERS III – Camp Smith, Oahu, HI (20% PV)

IPERC GridMaster® Intelligent Power Controller

5

• Proprietary microgrid control unit • Designed and tested for extreme

conditions • Includes:

– Single-board computer – Component interfaces – Communication interfaces – Hosted software

2MW PV at Fort Carson

6

SPIDERS Results – Independently Verified

7

• 30% fuel reduction when islanded • 42% CO2 emission decrease • 7% PV penetration

SPIDERS I – JBPHH, Oahu, HI 2.4MW microgrid

Commissioning March 2015

SPIDERS II – Fort Carson, CO 5.4MW microgrid

SPIDERS III – Camp Smith, Oahu, HI 5.0MW microgrid

• N+1 redundant power – no failures • Handled large inductive load startup • Cyber verified

• 40% load growth with no fuel increase (est ~29% fuel reduction) • Prioritized loads with shedding • 2 MW PV (40% renewables)

• N+1 redundant power – no failures • Reconfigured with loss of generator • Integrated Electric Vehicle Charging • Cyber verified

Project Methodology

8

• Evaluate Energy Needs • Review of Existing Assets • Customer and Site Limitations • Suggest Energy Options

Evaluation and Assessment

• Economic analysis (CAPEX/OPEX) • Equipment utilization; start-stop, cycling • Energy Consumption and Carbon Projections • Equipment mix selection

Modeling and Simulation

• Detailed Controls simulation • Installation and Commissioning • System Testing and Delivery • Customer Training

Implementation

ADVANCING THE POWER OF ENERGY

THANK YOU

[email protected]

www.IPERC.com

Darrell Massie

The IPERC Difference – Distributed Control

10

NOT THIS THIS Reflects outdated mainframe mentality A central CPU is a single point of failure Custom software is hard to update Legacy code is vulnerable to cyberattacks Unique configurations are hard to scale

Reflects current internet mentality Distributed CPUs create a resilient system A consistent platform facilitates updates Original code written for cybersecurity A modular approach is inherently scalable