Dr. Darrell D. Massie, P.E. - canadian-german-mining.com · The IPERC Difference – Distributed...
Transcript of Dr. Darrell D. Massie, P.E. - canadian-german-mining.com · The IPERC Difference – Distributed...
US DOD/DOE/DHS SPIDERS Project
3
Increased Energy Surety – Highly reliable power delivery – Cyber secure to protect against increasing attacks – Reduce dependency on single energy source when islanded (integrate
renewable and other distributed generation ) – Mitigate rising energy costs, volatile fuel prices and insecure supplies – Reduce carbon footprint; emissions and greenhouse gasses – Utility grid connected or islanded – Improve relationships with local communities – Suitable for increasing remote (off-grid) projects
SPIDERS Phased Approach
4
2.4MW microgrid built around wastewater treatment plant Completed January 2013
5.4MW microgrid built around mission-critical base command centers Completed October 2013
SPIDERS I – Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Oahu, HI (7% PV)
5.0MW microgrid encompassing entire Navy Pacific Command base Completion Summer 2015
SPIDERS II – Fort Carson, CO (40% PV)
SPIDERS III – Camp Smith, Oahu, HI (20% PV)
IPERC GridMaster® Intelligent Power Controller
5
• Proprietary microgrid control unit • Designed and tested for extreme
conditions • Includes:
– Single-board computer – Component interfaces – Communication interfaces – Hosted software
SPIDERS Results – Independently Verified
7
• 30% fuel reduction when islanded • 42% CO2 emission decrease • 7% PV penetration
SPIDERS I – JBPHH, Oahu, HI 2.4MW microgrid
Commissioning March 2015
SPIDERS II – Fort Carson, CO 5.4MW microgrid
SPIDERS III – Camp Smith, Oahu, HI 5.0MW microgrid
• N+1 redundant power – no failures • Handled large inductive load startup • Cyber verified
• 40% load growth with no fuel increase (est ~29% fuel reduction) • Prioritized loads with shedding • 2 MW PV (40% renewables)
• N+1 redundant power – no failures • Reconfigured with loss of generator • Integrated Electric Vehicle Charging • Cyber verified
Project Methodology
8
• Evaluate Energy Needs • Review of Existing Assets • Customer and Site Limitations • Suggest Energy Options
Evaluation and Assessment
• Economic analysis (CAPEX/OPEX) • Equipment utilization; start-stop, cycling • Energy Consumption and Carbon Projections • Equipment mix selection
Modeling and Simulation
• Detailed Controls simulation • Installation and Commissioning • System Testing and Delivery • Customer Training
Implementation
The IPERC Difference – Distributed Control
10
NOT THIS THIS Reflects outdated mainframe mentality A central CPU is a single point of failure Custom software is hard to update Legacy code is vulnerable to cyberattacks Unique configurations are hard to scale
Reflects current internet mentality Distributed CPUs create a resilient system A consistent platform facilitates updates Original code written for cybersecurity A modular approach is inherently scalable