do i >
description
Transcript of do i >
![Page 1: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
doi>
DOI – new applications panel
IDF Annual Members meeting Bologna 2005
![Page 2: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
doi>Scope – a reminder
• Digital Object Identifier =– not “Identifier of Digital Object”– but Digital Identifier of Object
• “Object” = any entity of interest in an intellectual property transaction. It can be physical, digital or abstract, e.g. people, organisations, agreements, etc.
• “Object” is defined by metadata and terminology from data dictionary (indecs framework et al) to ensure that “what you mean is what I mean “ (interoperability)
• What is identified is not necessarily what DOI resolves to (what is resolved to is “about” what is identified)
![Page 3: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
doi>Value of the DOI system
• See “DOI factsheet: Value added by the DOI system”– Version 1.0: www.doi.org/factsheets
• The value of the DOI system is from three functions:– Persistent identification– Network actionability– Semantic interoperability
• Value is added by each of these three – Each offers value– Can have one or more for a DOI application– The combination provides best advantage
![Page 4: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
doi>Value added (1)
• Design – A system for persistent, semantically interoperable, identification
of intellectual property entities on any digital network.– Media type neutral: applies to physical and digital objects and
abstract entities (resources, parties, licences, etc)
• Standards based– Uses existing components in building an added value application. – To be an ISO standard
• Syntax– Standard NISO Z39.84 syntax
• Technical Infrastructure– IDF funds aspects of technical infrastructure underlying the DOI
System
![Page 5: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
doi>Value added (2)
• Social infrastructure (persistence)
– IDF builds on top of Handle a social structure guaranteeing persistence, which is a function of organizations, not of technology; a persistent identifier system requires a persistent organization and defined processes.
• Resolution (network actionability)– Uses Handle System – Technology neutral (only requires internet connectivity)
• Data structure (semantic interoperability) – Precisely specify exactly what is identified– Can be used to embody any relationships, e.g. a parent-children
relationship. Handle technology allows this; DOI provides a framework to achieve it.
• Business potential – Registrants can incorporate persistent, semantically interoperable,
identification of intellectual property entities as part of services providing added value
![Page 6: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
doi>Some examples
• Using DOI for cultural artefacts:– Making available the form content of cuneiform tablets: the
Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (CDLI) (http: //cdli.ucla.edu)
• Using DOI for Licensing– Making licence information actionable: The Electronic Resource
Management Initiative (ERMI) and MI3P projects
• Using DOI for Public Sector Information– Navigating and accessing public sector information in Europe
• Using DOI for whole of value chain information management – For products where metadata needs to be changed and updated as
they “move” along the value chain
![Page 7: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
doi>Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative
• Persistent identification – Identifies the writing tablet for later citation by others
• Network actionability– Resolves to a single image or multiple, embedded images (cut out
images of the same writing tablet) or data
• Semantic interoperability– Specify exactly which tablet and image is identified – Enables translation (mapping into other languages) of the image
data, its history and other relevant facts– Metadata and objects can be included in other library collections
![Page 8: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Lead page of the CDLI
![Page 9: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
“Fat cross” archival image of same text, with cut-out. Full resolution (600ppi) on next slide
![Page 10: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Tablet obverse1.A. 1(N01) , |NINDA2+1(N01)| 1.B. 1(N05) , 2.A. 1(N01) , 1(N39A) 2.B. 1(N42A) , 3.A. 2(N01) , 1(N24) 3.B. 1(N42A) ,
4.A. 6(N01) , 1(N28) 4.B. 1(N42A) 1(N25) , 5.A. 2(N14) , GAR 5.B. 3(N42A) 1(N25) , …
The text to the left, sold in London in the early 90’s, was, using CDLI files, identified as a tablet looted from a southern Iraq museum during the Shiite uprising, and has been returned to the Iraq Museum
![Page 11: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
doi>Licensing
• Persistent identification – Identifies the parties and licences
• Network actionability– Resolves to licensing messages: permissions, restrictions and
requirements
• Semantic interoperability– Specifies precisely what is licensed and managed – enables
interoperability – Interoperability = the possibility of use in services outside the direct
control of the issuing assigner– Can be used for Inter-Library Loans, subscription agents or library
system vendors (ERMI project)– Can be used to support B2B licensing messages for online music licence
management (MI3P)
![Page 12: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
doi>Public Sector Information
• Persistent identification – Identifies the physical or digital manifestations of PSI
• Network actionability– Resolves to physical location of content
• Semantic interoperability– Specifies precisely what is identified and managed, enabling
interoperability– all “meaning the same thing” – Allows searches in multiple languages, across multiple databases
• Future enhancements?– Enables (if required) granular access and control for different
users
![Page 13: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
doi>Public Sector Information
![Page 14: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
doi>Value chain information management (1)
![Page 15: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
doi>Coursepacks across the value chain
• Persistent identification – Identifies the physical or digital manifestations of works
• Network actionability– Resolves to rights-cleared digital content or Print on Demand
output
• Semantic interoperability– Ensures that what a user thinks is being managed is what the
issuer meant to be managed: preserves the integrity of value chain process
– Can be used as part of resource discovery or ordering systems– Can link to Print on Demand facilities anywhere in the world
![Page 16: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
doi>Value chain information management (2)
• For products with volatile or context-sensitive supplier/terms:
• Persistent identification – Identifies a physical product, possibly using a discovery tool based on
an ageing data-repository
• Network actionability– Context-based resolution returns message (providing current supplier
routing-address and terms for that particular customer)
• Semantic interoperability– Enables ordering systems to communicate
![Page 18: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
doi>Conclusions
• Full functionality of DOI System (AP Framework, Data Dictionary), uptake and use?
• Additional generic tools (e.g. Acrobat plug-in)- role of IDF?
• Outreach to new applications- role of RAs, role of IDF?
![Page 19: do i >](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568151be550346895dbff126/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
doi>
Questions/ discussion
DOI – new applications panel