Discussion as a Discussion as a Way of TeachingWay of Teaching

STEPHEN BROOKFIELDDistinguished University Professor,University of St. Thomas

OUTCOMESOUTCOMES

TEN QUESTIONS …TEN QUESTIONS …What do you hope to achieve by using

discussion?What has stopped you from participating

in discussions?What happens when a discussion goes

well? What does it look, feel & sound like?

What does a good discussion leader do?How can we create the conditions for

good discussion?

Ten QuestionsTen QuestionsWhat’s the worst discussion you’ve ever

participated in and what made it so awful?What would it take for you to overcome your

resistance to take part in a discussion?Which discussion methods work best for

you? When is using discussion

counterproductive, inappropriate or a waste of time?

Think about the best discussion leader you’ve experienced. What did she do that was so impressive?

Chief Claims for DiscussionChief Claims for DiscussionCognitive – it helps students appreciate

the complexity of content Communicative – it strengthens their

ability to think & speak extemporaneously & clearly

Socio-political – it provides an analog of democratic exchange & decision-making

Affective – it solidifies students’emotional connections to subject matter

Why Discussions Fail

• Learning Unsuited to Discussion

• Unprepared Students

• Unrealistic Expectations

• No Ground Rules

• Reward Systems Askew

• No Teacher Modeling

Critical Incident Questionnaire Moment most engaged as a learner Moment most distanced as a learner Most affirming/helpful action Most puzzling/confusing action What surprised you most These are anonymously completed - the instructor reads

these & reports main findings at start of next class with time for discussion (if needed)

Creating Ground Rules

• Individuals reflect on features of best & worst discussions they’ve experienced

• Groups discuss commonly agreed features of best & worst discussions

• For each feature group asks how can this be encouraged &/or eliminated

• Class creates ground rules with teacher assistance (the 3 person rule, rotating roles, building on others’ contributions, providing evidence)

Circle of Voices

Individuals reflect on the discussion topic (1-3 minutes)Individuals reflect on the discussion topic (1-3 minutes) Participants go round the circle in order - each person has Participants go round the circle in order - each person has

up to 1 minute of uninterrupted air time to give their up to 1 minute of uninterrupted air time to give their viewpoint on the topic. No interruptions are allowed.viewpoint on the topic. No interruptions are allowed.

Move into free discussion with the ground rule that every Move into free discussion with the ground rule that every comment offered must somehow refer back to a comment comment offered must somehow refer back to a comment made by made by someone elsesomeone else in the opening circle of voices. in the opening circle of voices. This need This need NOTNOT be agreement - it can be a disagreement, a be agreement - it can be a disagreement, a question, an elaboration or extension, an illustration, and question, an elaboration or extension, an illustration, and so on.so on.

3 PERSON RULE

ONCE YOU HAVE SPOKEN YOU MAY NOT MAKE ANOTHER COMNTRIBUTION UNTIL AT LEAST 3 OTHERS HAVE SPOKEN - UNLESS SOMEONE ASKS YOU DIRECTLY TO EXPAND ON YOUR COMMENT

SnowballingSnowballing

People spend time individually reflecting on People spend time individually reflecting on the topicthe topic

Form into pairs & share reflectionsForm into pairs & share reflections Pairs form into quartetsPairs form into quartets Quartets form into octetsQuartets form into octets

AND SO ON & SO ON!!AND SO ON & SO ON!!

(An alternative way to move from small to (An alternative way to move from small to whole group discussion) whole group discussion)

STRUCTURED SILENCESTRUCTURED SILENCE

Every 15 minutes students write individually on 3x5 cards ONE of the following - most important point, most puzzling point, question they’d most like to discuss, something new they’ve learned - in the discussion so far.

Cards shuffled & responses read out by different students

Every 15 minutes students write individually on 3x5 cards ONE of the following - most important point, most puzzling point, question they’d most like to discuss, something new they’ve learned - in the discussion so far.

Cards shuffled & responses read out by different students

SPIRAL CONVERSATION

ONCE YOU HAVE SPOKEN YOU DO NOT SPEAK AGAIN UNTIL EVERYONE IN THE GROUP HAS CONTRIBUTED. FACILITATOR MONITORS THIS PROCESS - LATER CONTRIBUTORS CAN AGREE, DISAGREE OR PASS

Conversational MovesBring 3x5 cards to class with moves typed on each of them.

Participants choose 1 of these cards randomly.EXAMPLES OF SPECIFIC MOVESAsk a question or make a comment that shows you are interested in

another’s commentsMake a comment that underscores the link between 2 previous

contributionsMake a comment clearly building on what someone else has said -

make this link explicitMake a summary observation on a recurring theme in the discussionExpress appreciation for how another’s comments have helped your

understandingDisagree with someone in a respectful way

Conversational RolesConversational Roles

Problem PoserProblem Poser Reflective Reflective

AnalystAnalyst ScroungerScrounger UmpireUmpire DetectiveDetective

DevilDevil’’s s AdvocateAdvocate

Theme SpotterTheme Spotter Textual FocuserTextual Focuser Evidential Evidential

AssessorAssessor

Circular Response(Eduard Lindeman)

Individuals reflect on a topic for discussionForm into circles of 6-8 One person starts by giving her reflections on the topic. Up to 1 minute allowed - no interruptions

Person to left of 1st speaker goes next - whatever she says MUST somehow refer to/build on previous speaker’s comments (can be a disagreement or express confusion). Up to 1 minute allowed - no interruptions

Process continues leftwards around the circle with people speaking in order until all have participated

Group moves into open conversation with no particular ground rules in force

Mutual Invitation(Eric Law - The Wolf Shall dwell with the Lamb)

Facilitator begins by sharing her views on the topic

Facilitator chooses who will speak next - this person can pass but then chooses who will speak in their turn

No-one can interrupt the chosen speaker

Once all have spoken participants move into open discussion with no ground rules

Critical Conversation Protocol

Storyteller tells the tale - no interruptions Detectives ask questions about story Detectives report out assumptions they hear Detectives offer alternative interpretations Participants do an experiential audit (what

have we learned, would do differently etc.)

Umpire enforces ground rules throughout

Discussion Inventory

Tell students you reserve 5-10 minutes at the end of the discussion to offer your thoughts

On a notepad record:- - clear errors of fact or understanding, - perspectives that are ignored, - oppositional views that are smothered

Articulate these for 5-10 minutes before giving participants ‘the last word’ & the CIQ

Hatful of Quotes

Type out 5-6 provocative quotes from assigned reading on a 3x5 card (each quote will be on several cards)

Put these in a hat & have participants choose a card at random

Participants take turns (at their choosing) to respond to these quotes - or to earlier comments on these quotes

Quotes to Affirm & Challenge

Each participant brings in a quote she wishes to affirm, & one she wishes to challenge, from the assigned reading

Quotes to affirm - resonate with experience, explain difficult concepts clearly, add significant new information, are cogently expressed, are rhetorically powerful etc.

Quotes to challenge - immoral/unethical, poorly expressed, factually wrong, contradict experience

Quotes are shared in small groups & each group chooses ONE to affirm & ONE to challenge

In large group conversation the small group communicates rationales for each of these choices

NOMINATING QUESTIONS

Small groups come up with 1-2 questions they want to discuss further

Groups post questions on posters or black/white board

Students individually put a check against 2 questions they would like to discuss more

Whole class discussion is structured around questions with most votes

Newsprint Dialogue• Small groups put their deliberations on newsprint

sheets - no reporter is chosen to report these out• Newsprint sheets are then posted around the room &

blank sheets posted next to each sheet• Each participant takes a marker & wanders by

herself around the room - she writes her questions, reactions, agreements etc. directly onto the sheets or on the blanks posted next to them

• Groups reassemble at their postings to see what others have written

CHALK TALK• Facilitator writes a question in the

center of the board & circles it

• Whenever they wish people go to the board & write responses to question

• Others draw lines between responses to show connections/differences

• Facilitator adds responses as needed

Rotating StationsRotating Stations

Small groups record their deliberations on newsprint Small groups record their deliberations on newsprint sheets and hang these on the wall - a blank sheet sheets and hang these on the wall - a blank sheet hangs next to each grouphangs next to each group’’s postings posting

Staying in their small groups, each group visits the Staying in their small groups, each group visits the posting next to theirs - as a group they post their posting next to theirs - as a group they post their reactions to the posting on the blank sheetsreactions to the posting on the blank sheets

GroupGroup’’s rotate until they arrive at their own posting. s rotate until they arrive at their own posting. They review all the previous groupsThey review all the previous groups’’ comments comments

Whole class discussion follows on how groups reacted Whole class discussion follows on how groups reacted to other groupsto other groups’’ postings postings

GRADING FOR PARTICIPATION:

BEHAVIORAL INDICATORS Ask a question of a peer that draws out

their thinkingBring in a resource not covered in the

syllabus that adds new info. or ideasMake a comment that underscores the

link between 2 people’s commentsUse body language to show interest in a

person’s contribution

PARTICIPATION (II)

Post an online comment that summarizes our discussion or suggests a new direction

Make a comment (online is ok) about how you found another’s comments useful or interesting. Be as specific as possible.

Contribute something that builds on what another has said - be explicit about how you are doing this

PARTICIPATION (III)

• Make a comment on the CIQ or online that helps us examine discussion dynamics

• Ask a cause and effect question• Express appreciation for how the discussion has helped you understand something better (online is OK). Be specific about exactly what was helpful.

• Summarize several people’s comments

PARTICIPATION AUDIT

HOW DID YOU? …Express Appreciation for a ContributionConnect 2 or 3 previous commentsPoint out differencesDraw out another’s thinkingAsk a helpful questionContribute a new idea

APPRECIATIVE PAUSEComments allowed only that thank people for:A question that was asked that suggested a

new line of thinkingA comment that clarified a confusing ideaA new idea or piece of information not

considered beforeA comment showing the connection between

two other ideasAn example given that helped understanding

a difficult concept

Discussion Learning Audit

• As a result of today’s discussion … What do you know that you didn’t know

this time last week? What can you do that you couldn’t do this

time last week? What could you teach someone else to

know or do that you couldn’t teach them this time last week?

What Would it Take?

• Former resisters testified to its utility

• Faculty modeled their own participation

• My silence was not misconstrued

• I was not coerced into speech

• Open - not a guessing game of ‘what the teacher thinks’

• Group developed & observed ground rules

• Participation was assessed by multiple indicators