Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis...

47
Digital Surgery Complications Zeeshan S. Husain, DPM, FACFAS, FASPS Great Lakes Foot and Ankle Institute September 21, 2018 Annual Surgical Conference 2018

Transcript of Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis...

Page 1: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Digital Surgery Complications

Zeeshan S. Husain, DPM, FACFAS, FASPSGreat Lakes Foot and Ankle Institute

September 21, 2018

Annual Surgical Conference 2018

Page 2: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Disclosures

• None

Page 3: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Presentation Outline

• Differentials– Neuroma– Plantar plate injury– Metatarsalgia– Hammertoe

• Influencing factors– Anatomy

• Hammertoe• Rigidity• Plane(s) of deformity

• Complications

Page 4: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Presentation Outline

• Differentials– Neuroma– Plantar plate injury– Metatarsalgia– Hammertoe

• Influencing factors– Anatomy

• Hammertoe• Rigidity• Plane(s) of deformity

• Complications

• Treatment options– Arthrodesis– Tendon transfers

• Flexor tenotomy• Girdlestone-Taylor

– Variations

• EDB transfer• Hibbs

• What have I learned?– Arthroplasty needs to be

retired

Page 5: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Plantar Plate

• Subjective– “Walking on pebble”– Wart under foot– Pain

• Under MPJ• MPJ effusion

• Biomechanical– Hammertoe– Hallux abductovalgus– Elongated 2nd metatarsal1

– Equinus

• Iatrogenic– Steroid2

1. Klein, et al, Foot Ankle Spec 6:2, 2013.

2. Reis, et al., J Bone Joint Surg 71B:5, 1989.

Page 6: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Differential Diagnoses

• Misdiagnosis– Capsulitis / Synovitis– Freiberg’s disease– Arthritides– Stress fracture– Neuroma1

• Single 97/279

– 3rd interspace 74.2%

• Multiple 182/279

– 2nd interspace 98.9%– 3rd interspace 100.0%

1. Valero, et al., J Foot Ankle Surg 54:3, 2015.

2nd MPJ plantar exposure

2nd IMS neuroma

Page 7: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

The Plantar Plate

• Plantar plate function– Stabilize MPJ with lumbricales

and FDL– Resists DF tensile forces– Offers gliding surface for flexor

tendons– Weakest at base of phalanx1

– Assists Windlass mechanism

• Lachman test– DF toe at 25°– Translate dorsally / plantarly

1. Jolly, in Master Techniques in Podiatric Surgery: The Foot and Ankle, ed. Chang, Lippincott,

Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2005.

Page 8: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Staging MPJ Instability

• Stage 1– Subtle edema with pain to plantar MPJ– Most (70-90%) alleviate in several days

• Stage 2– Moderate edema– Radiographic deviation of digit– Loss of toe purchase– Poor response to conservative treatment

• Stage 3– Moderate edema– Frank subluxation/dislocation– Often seen with HAV deformity– Rarely responds to conservative treatment

Yu and Judge, in Reconstructive Surgery of Foot and Leg, editors Camasta, et al., Podiatry

Institute Publishing, pp109-13, 1995.

Page 9: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Staging MPJ Instability

• Grade 0- No instability– No joint pain, thickening, or swelling

– Prodromal phase but no deformity

• Grade 1- Mild instability– Synovitis and mild deviation

– Positive drawer sign without significant deformity

• Grade 2- Moderate instability– Dorsomedial deviation/subluxation

– Positive drawer sign with deformity

• Grade 3- Dislocated MPJ– Positive drawer sign with cross-over deformity

• Grade 4- Rigid dislocated MPJ

Haddad, et al., Foot Ankle Int 20:12, 1999.

Page 10: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Imaging

• Radiographs

• Ultrasound• Dynamic

• Arthrogram

• MRI

Page 11: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Imaging

• Radiographs

• Ultrasound• Dynamic

• Arthrogram

• MRIMTH

Base of

phalanx

Page 12: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Imaging

• Radiographs

• Ultrasound• Dynamic

• Arthrogram

• MRI

Normal plantar plate

MTH

Base of

phalanx

Page 13: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Imaging

• Radiographs

• Ultrasound• Dynamic

• Arthrogram

• MRI

Page 14: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Imaging

• Radiographs

• Ultrasound• Dynamic

• Arthrogram

• MRI

Page 15: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Imaging

• Radiographs

• Ultrasound• Dynamic

• Arthrogram

• MRI

Yao, et al., Am J Roentgenol 163:3, 1994.

Page 16: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Imaging

• Radiographs

• Ultrasound• Dynamic

• Arthrogram

• MRI

Page 17: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Hammertoe Complications

• Reproducibility– Predictable results

• Arthrodesis

– Retire the arthroplasty

• Typical complications– Incision contracture– Prolonged swelling– Floating toe– Poor purchase– Deviated toe if

performing arthroplasty– Issues with K-wires

Page 18: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Hammertoe Complications

• Proposed algorithm– Rigid?

• PIPJ arthrodesis

– Flexible?• Restore MPJ and PIPJ

congruency with tendon transfer(s)

– Goals• Restore FDL function• Joint congruency• Correct transverse plane

deformity

• Reproducibility– Predictable results

• Arthrodesis

– Retire the arthroplasty

• Typical complications– Incision contracture– Prolonged swelling– Floating toe– Poor purchase– Deviated toe if

performing arthroplasty– Issues with K-wires

Page 19: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Literature

• Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis– n = 244

– Most common reason for revision• Transfer metatarsalgia• Recurrent bunion• Lesser digit deformity

– Satisfaction rates after revision• Revisions- 176/244• 24% with reservations• 6% dissatisfied

Kilmartin, J Foot Ankle Surg 41:5, 2002.

Page 20: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Literature

• Complications of digital and lesser metatarsal surgery– Risk factors and co-morbidities

– Wound healing and infectious complications

– Smoking

– Implant failure and management

– Acute digital correction of longstanding toe deformities

– AVN of lesser metatarsals following surgery

– Floating and flail toe deformity

Bibbo, et al., Clin Podiatr Med Surg 27:4, 2010.

Page 21: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy

• Indications– Metatarsalgia– Metatarsal parabola– Plantar plate techniques

• Floating toe rates– Migues, et al.

• Incidence– Osteotomy alone 28.5%– With digital correction 50.0%

– Highlander, et al.• Incidence

– Floating toe 36.0%

Migues, et al., Foot Ankle Int 25:9, 2004.

Highlander, et al., Foot Ankle Spec 4:3, 2011.

Page 22: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Malposition

• Considerations– Level of deformity– Influence of adjacent

digits– Osseous versus soft

tissue

Page 23: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Optimizing Results

• Recognizing pathology– Anatomy

– Plantar plate injury?

– Rigidity

– Plane(s) of deformity

• Predictable outcomes– Arthrodesis

– Tendon transfers• FDL

• EDB

Trethowan, Lancet 205:5312, 1925.

Taylor, J Bone Joint Surg 33B, 1951.

Forrester-Brown, J Bone Joint Surg 20A:1,

1938.

Page 24: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

• Direct plantar approach

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

Page 25: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

• Dorsal surgical approach

– Metatarsal osteotomy

– Plantar plate exposure

– Suture plantar plate

– Phalanx suture tunnels

– Tension repair

– Metatarsal fixation

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

Page 26: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

• Dorsal surgical approach

– Metatarsal osteotomy

– Plantar plate exposure

– Suture plantar plate

– Phalanx suture tunnels

– Tension repair

– Metatarsal fixation

Page 27: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

• Dorsal surgical approach

– Metatarsal osteotomy

– Plantar plate exposure

– Suture plantar plate

– Phalanx suture tunnels

– Tension repair

– Metatarsal fixation

Page 28: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

• Dorsal surgical approach

– Metatarsal osteotomy

– Plantar plate exposure

– Suture plantar plate

– Phalanx suture tunnels

– Tension repair

– Metatarsal fixation

Page 29: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

• Dorsal surgical approach

– Metatarsal osteotomy

– Plantar plate exposure

– Suture plantar plate

– Phalanx suture tunnels

– Tension repair

– Metatarsal fixation

Page 30: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

• Dorsal surgical approach

– Metatarsal osteotomy

– Plantar plate exposure

– Suture plantar plate

– Phalanx suture tunnels

– Tension repair

– Metatarsal fixation

Page 31: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

• Dorsal surgical approach

– Metatarsal osteotomy

– Plantar plate exposure

– Suture plantar plate

– Phalanx suture tunnels

– Tension repair

– Metatarsal fixation

Page 32: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- Plantar Plate

• What did I do?– Repaired attenuated ligament– Will it hold?

• Alternative– FDL tendon transfer

Reinforce correction with steri-strips

Pre-op

Post-op

Page 33: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- FDL Transfer

• Surgical approach

– PIPJ preparation

– FDL tendon

– Bone tunnel

– Tension tendon

– Bone anchor

Page 34: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- FDL Transfer

• Surgical approach

– PIPJ preparation

– FDL tendon

– Bone tunnel

– Tension tendon

– Bone anchor

Page 35: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- FDL Transfer

• Surgical approach

– PIPJ preparation

– FDL tendon

– Bone tunnel

– Tension tendon

– Bone anchor

Page 36: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- FDL Transfer

• Surgical approach

– PIPJ preparation

– FDL tendon

– Bone tunnel

– Tension tendon

– Bone anchor

Page 37: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- FDL Transfer

• Surgical approach

– PIPJ preparation

– FDL tendon

– Bone tunnel

– Tension tendon

– Bone anchor

Page 38: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- FDL Transfer

• Surgical approach

– PIPJ preparation

– FDL tendon

– Bone tunnel

– Tension tendon

– Bone anchor

Page 39: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- FDL Transfer

• Surgical approach

– PIPJ preparation

– FDL tendon

– Bone tunnel

– Tension tendon

– Bone anchor

Page 40: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- EDB Transfer

1

• Surgical approach

– Metatarsal bone tunnel• Pass suture under

deep intermetatarsal ligament

– Proximal phalanx bone tunnel

– Adjust tension

* Downey, et al., in McGlamry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery,

ed. Southerland, et al., Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadephia, 2013.

*

Page 41: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- EDB Transfer

1

• Surgical approach

– Metatarsal bone tunnel• Pass suture under

deep intermetatarsal ligament

– Proximal phalanx bone tunnel

– Adjust tension

* Downey, et al., in McGlamry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery,

ed. Southerland, et al., Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadephia, 2013.

*

Page 42: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- EDB Transfer

• Surgical approach

– Metatarsal bone tunnel• Pass suture under

deep intermetatarsal ligament

– Proximal phalanx bone tunnel

– Adjust tension

2

* Downey, et al., in McGlamry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery,

ed. Southerland, et al., Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadephia, 2013.

*

Page 43: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- EDB Transfer

• Surgical approach

– Metatarsal bone tunnel• Pass suture under

deep intermetatarsal ligament

– Proximal phalanx bone tunnel

– Adjust tension

3

* Downey, et al., in McGlamry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery,

ed. Southerland, et al., Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadephia, 2013.

*

Page 44: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Case Scenario- EDB Transfer

• Surgical approach

– Metatarsal bone tunnel• Pass suture under

deep intermetatarsal ligament

– Proximal phalanx bone tunnel

– Adjust tension

* Downey, et al., in McGlamry’s Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery,

ed. Southerland, et al., Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadephia, 2013.

*

Page 45: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Post-operatively

• Cicatrix contracture

• Splintage– K-wire– Bandaging– Taping– Splinting

• Weightbearing status– Surgical shoe

Page 46: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Conclusions

• Accurate diagnosis– Determine deforming

factors

• Balance expectations

• Be definitive on surgical procedures– Arthrodesis– Tendon transfers

Page 47: Digital Surgery Complications - ASPS · •Revision of failed foot surgery: a critical analysis –n = 244 –Most common reason for revision •Transfer metatarsalgia •Recurrent

Thank You

Zeeshan S. Husain, DPM, FACFAS, [email protected]

Annual Surgical Conference 2018