Digital footprint@artesis vf

61
Digital Footprint and many other challenges and evolutionary paths Justino Lourenço Feb.2012 ISPGaya, V.N.Gaia, Portugal

Transcript of Digital footprint@artesis vf

Page 1: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Digital Footprint and many

other challenges and

evolutionary paths Justino Lourenço – Feb.2012

ISPGaya, V.N.Gaia, Portugal

Page 2: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Index

Digital Footprint

Mobile Communication technologies

Communication cells concept

Relevant issues

What comes next?

Page 3: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Digital footprint …

Page 4: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Definition A digital footprint is a trail left by interactions in a digital

environment; including the usage of TV, mobile phone,

internet and world wide web, mobile web and other devices

and sensors. Digital footprints provide data on what has been

performed in the digital environment; and are used in

behavioral targeting, personalization, targeted marketing,

digital reputation, and other social media or social graphing

services. In social media, a digital footprint is the size of a

person's "online presence" measured by the number of

individuals with whom they interact. [Wikipedia, 25 Jan 2013]

A person's “digital footprint” reflects how he or she actively

participates in the digital universe, including use of the

Internet and social networks, e-mail, cell phones, digital

cameras and credit cards.

(Source: http://securitysolutions.com/mag/digital_footprint_idc/)

Page 5: Digital footprint@artesis vf

What is the problem? A big amount of personal data is distributed among several

heterogeneous Databases ….

1994: George Orwell publishes the book “1984”;

1997: Wim Wenders directs the movie “The End of Violence”;

2007: Mary Madden, Susannah Fox, Aaron Smith and Jessica

Vitak publishes the book “Digital Footprints”;

2009: Tony Fish publishes the book “My Digital Footprint”;

………………………;

Page 6: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Ordinary daily scenario After waking up, i start zapping on my cable TV;

While eating I surf on my tablet;

I am going to work, while my car (in the background) is

syncing some maintenance data threw a 4G network;

During the trip I get caught by several traffic and surveillance

cameras;

I stop @ an ATM;

I arrive at work, I use my NFC phone to check in;

I start the working day by checking email.

Page 7: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Any of you have “googled” your

own name?

47 % of American users have at leas once searched on the

Internet their own name.

Five years ago the number was only 22%.

Page 8: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Who profits with that? The collected data can be used by the several players, in order

to redirect marketing attacks in a one-to-one approach ….

Page 9: Digital footprint@artesis vf

How do we handle our personal

problem? Personal data spread in a non homogeneous form;

Worldwide dissemination;

Complex to be quantified;

Dynamically changing.

Some companies already earn money in Googlewashing…

Page 10: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Digital Footprint Scenarios ATM

Cable TV Interaction

Traffic Control System

Internet tracks

Wired access

Wireless access

2G/ 3G / 4G

Granularity of the cells

Page 11: Digital footprint@artesis vf

ATM

Page 12: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Cable TV interaction

Page 13: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Traffic Control System

Page 14: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Internet tracks Cookies approach;

Spontaneous data spreading;

Surfing tracks;

Social network activities.

Page 15: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Surfing the web – Wireless WIRED: Allocated IP gives me a geographical position

WLAN: Several software solutions track the users connected

to an AP.

3G/4G: Databases keep track of geographical position;

Page 16: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Wired Access tracks IP Providers need to prevent fraud over Internet;

Page 17: Digital footprint@artesis vf

WLAN Access Access Points keep track of each connect client …

Page 18: Digital footprint@artesis vf

3G / 4G Access

Page 19: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Some important issues: To have high rates of transmission you will have always to

deal with:

Noise

Signal attenuation

Interference

Spectrum availability

Page 20: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Technical Aspects Noise

Noise Model

Signal Attenuation

Interference

Multipath

Conclusions

Page 21: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Noise ?

Page 22: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Noise model example

Page 23: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Signal attenuation

Page 24: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Interference Other signals in the same spectrum

Coexistence of signals using the same channel

Exceptions for CDMA approach!

Page 25: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Co-channel Interference

Page 26: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Multipath Effect

Page 27: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Conclusions So as long as the signal travels in wireless/cable the signal

suffers from attenuation/noise/interference so:

Shorter paths are better

Move into smaller cells Easier user localization

Page 28: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Technical Aspects Evolutionary path of the mobile networks

Standards for mobile communications

1G

2G

3G

LTE

Wimax

Page 29: Digital footprint@artesis vf

What was the evolutionary path in

mobile networks? Analog approach (1G);

Digital Approach (2G and beyond )

Page 30: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Steps in the evolutionary path

1980’s

@ First voice was treated in a similar form to PSTN;

Broadband systems;

Full analog communications;

Voice centric;

Up to 56 Kbps;

Autonomy problems;

Not as portable as desired;

And of course the communication costs…

Page 31: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Standards for 1G NMT (Nordic Mobile Telephone) - Nordic countries,

Switzerland, Netherlands, Eastern Europe and Russia;

AMPS (Advanced Mobile Phone System) - North America and Australia,;

TACS (Total Access Communications System) - United Kingdom;

C-450 - West Germany, Portugal and South Africa,

Radiocom 2000 – France;

RTMI - Italy.;

Japan - JTACS (Japan Total Access Communications System) .

Page 32: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Standards for 2G

GSM (TDMA-based), originally from Europe but used in almost all countries on all six inhabited continents. Today accounts for over 80% of all subscribers around the world. Over 60 GSM operators are also using CDMA2000 in the 450 MHz frequency band (CDMA450).[2]

IS-95 aka cdmaOne (CDMA-based, commonly referred as simply CDMA in the US), used in the Americas and parts of Asia. Over a dozen CDMA operators have migrated to GSM including operators in Mexico, India, Australia and South Korea.

PDC (TDMA-based), used exclusively in Japan

iDEN (TDMA-based), proprietary network used by Nextel in the United States and Telus Mobility in Canada

D-AMPS (TDMA-based, commonly referred as simply 'TDMA' in the US), was once prevalent in the Americas but most have migrated to GSM.

Page 33: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Standards for 3G

The Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, created

and revised by the 3GPP:

W-CDMA is the most common deployment, commonly operated

on the 2,100 MHz band. A few others use the 850, 900 and 1,900

MHz bands.

HSPA is an amalgamation of several upgrades to the original W-

CDMA standard and offers speeds of 14.4 Mbit/s down and 5.76

MBit/s up. HSPA is backwards compatible with and uses the

same frequencies as W-CDMA.

HSPA+, a further revision and upgrade of HSPA, can provide

theoretical peak data rates up to 168 Mbit/s in the downlink and

22 Mbit/s in the uplink, using a combination of air interface

improvements as well as multi-carrier HSPA and MIMO.

Technically though, MIMO and DC-HSPA can be used without the

"+" enhancements of HSPA+

Page 34: Digital footprint@artesis vf

3GPP Long Term Evolution

(LTE) The pre-4G 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) technology is

often branded "4G-LTE", but the first LTE release does not

fully comply with the IMT-Advanced requirements!

LTE has a theoretical net bit rate capacity of up to 100 Mbit/s in

the downlink and 50 Mbit/s in the uplink if a 20 MHz channel is

used — and more if multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), i.e.

antenna arrays, are used.

IMT specifications are more severe, check this link!

Page 35: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Mobile WiMAX (IEEE 802.16e)

The Mobile WiMAX (IEEE 802.16e-2005) mobile wireless

broadband access (MWBA) standard (also known as WiBro

in South Korea) is sometimes branded 4G, and offers peak

data rates of hundred Mbit/s downlink and less then a

hundred Mbit/s uplink.

Page 36: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Communications Cell Concept

Page 37: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Concept / Evolution of cell Communication Cell: maximum range of a mobile

communications technology that guarantees the following

objectives:

Acceptable quality communication

Reasonable data flow (uplink / downlink)

Adequate BER

Technological Support

Page 38: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Types of cells

Macrocell;

Microcell;

Picocell;

Femtocell.

Cell size decreasing

Page 39: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Granularity of the cells Questions?

More users

Spectrum allocation

More Bandwidth

Better S/N

Better BER

Smaller Communication

Cells …

Better georeference detection of

each user!

Page 40: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Cells Evolution

Page 41: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Femtocell Approach

Page 42: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Architecture Review

Technical aspects of Mobile Architectures from 1G to ..

Page 43: Digital footprint@artesis vf

GSM Architecture

Page 44: Digital footprint@artesis vf

3 G Architecture

Page 45: Digital footprint@artesis vf

LTE

Page 46: Digital footprint@artesis vf

WLAN Traffic Offload in LTE

Page 47: Digital footprint@artesis vf

WLAN Traffic Offload in LTE (2)

However, this works only for a complete offload, i.e. it is either

possible to communicate over the LTE connection or over the

WLAN connection, but not over (The reason is that in this

architecture the WLAN network is considered as a foreign

network, to which all the data packets are forwarded when there

is a corresponding entry in the binding cache of the HA)

Page 48: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Evolution perspectives ?

Page 49: Digital footprint@artesis vf

What about 5G, 6G .. All IP network;

Infraestruture shared;

Contents are Multimedia;

Voice is becoming residual;

Unit of communication Gbps;

Massive optical fiber distribution around the cities;

Increasing number of Cellular diffusion systems;

Massive use of “Smart Antenna” technology;

Page 50: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Smart Antenna Tech

Page 51: Digital footprint@artesis vf

More future features ..

With the increasing demand of :

Data traffic;

QoS;

Low latency

Some services are non time critical !

Release resources to time critical services..

Page 52: Digital footprint@artesis vf

How to do it ? Delay Tolerant approach :

Page 53: Digital footprint@artesis vf

What can DTN brings?

Preventive network overload;

Bypass network disruptive connectivity.

How ?

Distribute contents whenever the nodes / network is ready!

Examples ?

Page 54: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Multimedia Delivery

Page 55: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Internet is always changing ..

Page 56: Digital footprint@artesis vf

What about internet evolution ? Will IP v6 be enough ?

Move into a new Future Internet Approach:

4WARD

NSF

FIRE

Page 57: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Web versions evolution

Page 58: Digital footprint@artesis vf
Page 60: Digital footprint@artesis vf

So TV …? All IP (or future Internet support) will be nothing more then a

multimedia repository ….

We will keep watching the news / sports/ … alive;

But we will see the contents as we want.

E-learning solutions;

E-health solutions;

TV and Computer fusion?

Page 61: Digital footprint@artesis vf

Questions ?

Thank you for your time and

patience ..

Justino Lourenço – ISPGaya

http://www.linkedin.com/in/justinolourenco

[email protected]