dfgdfgdfgdfg
-
Upload
angelmusic27 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
description
Transcript of dfgdfgdfgdfg
1
ECONOMICS 11TOPIC 10
DETERMINATION OF NATIONAL INCOME
U-PRIMO E. RODRIGUEZDept. of Econ., UPLB
OBJECTIVEExplain fluctuations in national income
Helps understand changes in national income
Helps in formulating policy and business decisions
The road aheadBasic framework
Consumption and income
Two sector economy
Three sector economy
2
BASIC FRAMEWORK
Tasks
Define aggregate expenditure and equilibrium income
Describe how the economy adjusts to equilibrium
Explain how changes in aggregate expenditure affect equilibrium income
Aggregate expenditure (AE)total amount that all economic agents want/plan to spend on domestic goods/servicesAgents: households, firms, govt, foreigners
Common formulationAE = C + I + G + X – MC = consumption, I = investment, G = govt
spending, X = exports, M = importsNote: AE is not the same as GDP.
AE = planned spending GDP = actual spending/output
3
AE and National output (Y)There is no reason to expect that Y and AE are equal. Firms formulate production plans armed only with an
estimate of how much economic agents want to buy. If AE is not equal Y, then firms adjust production
AE > Y, increase production AE < Y, decrease production
Discrepancies between AE and Y reflected in unintended inventories AE > Y, firm inventories fall AE < Y, firms accumulate inventories
Equilibrium: Y = AEWhy? No longer an incentive to adjust production
IllustrationAssume AE does not respond to changes in income Horizontal line in (Y,AE) space (AE schedule) Highly unrealistic but sufficient for now
450 line: illustrates all potential equilibrium positions (Y = AE)Equilibrium: intersection of the 450 line and AE schedule
5
45º
E0 AE20
AE
020 YY*
AE < Y…Reduce production
45º
E1
AE1
30
AE
030 YY1
Higher AE raises equilibrium income (Y*)
20
20Y0
AE0
E0
6
Keynes (1936) suggested that consumption spending tends to increase with income
Higher income leads to higher consumption spending
Income Consumption
(Y) (C)0 200
200 350400 500600 650800 800
1,000 9501,200 1,1001,400 1,2501,600 1,400
CONSUMPTION AND INCOME
Low levels of YC > Y
Y C0 200
200 350400 500600 650800 800
1,000 9501,200 1,1001,400 1,2501,600 1,400
Break-even level: C = Y
High levels of YY > C
7
Autonomousconsumption
Y C0 200
200 350400 500600 650800 800
1,000 9501,200 1,1001,400 1,2501,600 1,400
Marginal propensityto consume (mpc) =
change in consumption spending for a one peso increase in income
mpc = ∆C / ∆Y
Example Y C0 200
200 350400 500600 650800 800
1,000 9501,200 1,1001,400 1,2501,600 1,400
∆C = 500 – 350 = 150∆Y = 400 - 200 = 200
mpc = ∆C / ∆Y= 150/200 = 0.75
… a 1 peso increase in Y leads to 75 centavo increase in C
Note: 0 < mpc < 1
8
Completing the table
Y C ∆Y ∆C ∆C/∆Y0 200 — — _
200 350 200 150 0.75400 500 200 150 0.75600 650 200 150 0.75800 800 200 150 0.75
1,000 950 200 150 0.751,200 1,100 200 150 0.751,400 1,250 200 150 0.751,600 1,400 200 150 0.75
Consumption schedule (based on values in the previous table)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
800 1200 1600
400
1200
1400
1600C
Y
C
Autonomous consumption
Slope is the mpc
9
Drawing a 450 line helps identify some important regions
0
200
400
600
800
1000
800 1200 1600
400
1200
1400
1600C
Y
C 450
Break-even
Y > C
Y < C
Mathematical representation: Consumption function
Autonomous consumption
Example consistent with the numbers in the table:C = 200 + 0.75 Y
10
TWO-SECTOR MODELTwo sectors: Households and firms
No govt and no foreign trade
ImplicationAE = C + I
Assumption: I is autonomous and equal to 100Next slide: Integrate to previous table on consumption and income
Y C I AE
400 500 100 600
600 650 100 750
800 800 100 900
1,000 950 100 1,050
1,200 1,100 100 1,200
1,400 1,250 100 1,350
investment
AE = C + I
11
Y C I AE
400 500 100 600
600 650 100 750
800 800 100 900
1,000 950 100 1,050
1,200 1,100 100 1,200
1,400 1,250 100 1,350
Equilibrium: Y = AEExample, equilibrium income (Y*) = 1,200
Graphical treatment: Revised AE
12
Graphical treatment: Equilibrium
Experiment: What if I investment rises from 100 to 200? I.e. ∆I = 100Equilibrium income rises from 1,200 (our original value) to 1,600
Y C I AE
400 500 200 700
600 650 200 850
800 800 200 1000
1,000 950 200 1150
1,200 1,100 200 1300
1,400 1,250 200 1450
1600 1400 200 1600
1800 1550 200 1750
13
Graphical treatment
Summary: The 100 peso increase in
investment led to a 400 peso
increase in equilibrium income.
Question: Why is the increase in Y
bigger than the increase in I?
The answer lies in the notion of the
multiplier.
14
Multiplier ()Measures the change in income for a unit change in an autonomous component of aggregate expenditure…investment in the previous experiment
Mathematical representation for the change in investment
How is the multiplier calculated?
Applied to our example:
15
Using the multiplier to infer the effects of a change in investment:
This explains why a 100 peso increase in investment led to a 400 peso (=4*100) increase in Y*
Why is the multiplier greater than 1?
Round ∆C ∆ I ∆ Y1 0 100 1002 mpc•[100] 0 mpc•100
3 mpc• [mpc•100] 0 mpc2•100
… … … …
n mpc•[ mpcn-2•100] 0 mpcn-1•100
Initial increase in investment
17
Substituting the consumption and investment equations into the equilibrium condition:
Solving for Y:
Applied to our exampleKey equations
18
Substituting the consumption and investment equations into the equilibrium condition:
Solving for Y:
Question: Where in all this is saving?
Saving represents that component of income which is not spent on consumption (i.e. S = Y-C)The story on how savings fits into the current topic will be discussed in another course (Econ 101).
WAKAS