Design of Low Power CMOS FULL SUBTRACTORijiset.com/v1s6/IJISET_V1_I6_11.pdf · IJISET -...
Transcript of Design of Low Power CMOS FULL SUBTRACTORijiset.com/v1s6/IJISET_V1_I6_11.pdf · IJISET -...
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 1 Issue 6, August 2014.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
76
Design of Low Power CMOS FULL SUBTRACTOR K. Prasad Babu#1, S. Ahmed Basha#2, H.Devanna #3
#1 E.C.E. Department, Assistant Professor, #2Assistant Professor, #3Associate Professor
JNTU Anantapur. University India St.John’s College of Engineering & Technology, Yemmiganur, 518360, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh,India.
Abstract
Complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor is widely used in manufacturing of IC. CMOS application is felt in microprocessor, microcontrollers, memories, many digital circuits. And are also used for several analog circuits. Due to high noise immunity and low static power consumption CMOS circuits are widely preferred with other logic circuits. CMOS circuits employ p-type and n-type MOSFETs to implement logic gates and other digital circuits. In this Paper we are designing Low power full subtractor using CMOS circuits, with various technologies compared with power dissipation individually.
Keywords: CMOS, FULL-SUBTRACTOR, Low-Power, Technologies.
1. Introduction The subtraction of two binary numbers may be
accomplished by taking the complement of the subtrahend and adding it to the minuend..
The full-subtractor is a combinational circuit which is used to perform subtraction of three bits. It has three inputs, A (minuend) and B(subtrahend) and C (subtrahend) and two outputs D (difference) and B (borrow). The Truth table is as show below
A B C DIFFERENCE BORROW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 The Conventional Full Subtractor using gates is as shown below.
D=A B Borin Borout = Borin (A B)+A.B Section 2. is about implementation part of full subtractor
using CMOS gates and its operation with the truth table of various input combinations. Section 3 shows the implementation of Layout. Section 4 is the analog simulation.
Section 5 deals the result table of various technologies with power dissipation used by us . Section 6 shows the conclusion and futurescope
In this paper we are designing the basic CMOS full subtractor and applying the various technologies.
The scaling of Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) transistors has so far provided lower cost and higher performance circuits. However, further progress of integration scale will be hindered by a variety of physical effects. The most important effects are the increase in power consumption and the decrease in reliability 0–0.
Switching power dissipated by a CMOS device is given by the formula
2. Implementation In this paper we are designing and the full subtractor using
CMOS gates. The basic gate functionality is implemented without any
degradation in the outputs individually. Initially we start with CMOS implementation of EXOR
gate, AND gate, Inverter, OR gate. All these modules are integrated.
The CMOS FULLSUBTRACTOR is as shown below
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 1 Issue 6, August 2014.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
77
Circuit Operation
Timing Diagram
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 1 Issue 6, August 2014.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
78
3. Layout The layout is stick diagrammatic representation of CMOS
full subtractor showing NMOS , PMOS, P-diffussion, Metal, Connect, N-diffussion Layers. With A,B,C as the inputs and Difference, Borrow as the outputs.
CMOS 0.12um
4. Analog Simulation
It is the pictorial representation of corresponding inputs with the outpus, mentioning the power dissipation. We represent CMOS 0.12um, CMOS 90nm, CMOS 70nm, CMOS 45nm,
CMOS 32nm technologies.
CMOS 90nm
CMOS 70nm
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 1 Issue 6, August 2014.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
79
CMOS 45nm
CMOS 32nm
5. RESULT Table
Sl.No Technology & No.Of Metal Vdd
volts
Power Dissipati
on 1 0.12µm & 6 1.2-2.5 38.140µ
W 2 90nm & 6 1.00-2.5 27.493
µW 3 70nm & 6 0.70-2.5 11.903
µW 4 45nm & 8 0.4- 1.80 4.45 µW 5 32nm & 8 0.35-
1.20 3.600 µW
6. Conclusion & Future scope From the above table we conclude that CMOS FULL
SUBTRACTOR with 32nm technology is having low power dissipation when compared with other technologies.
Further reduction in power dissipation can be achieved with lowest technologies and voltage scaling without degradation of functionality.
IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 1 Issue 6, August 2014.
www.ijiset.com
ISSN 2348 – 7968
80
References [1] Milind Gautam, Shyam Akashe," Reduction of Leakage
Current and Power in Full Subtractor Using MTCMOS Technique”, 2013 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI -2013), Jan. 04 – 06, 2013, Coimbatore, INDIA.
[2] K.Navi, O. Kavehei, M. Rouholamini, A. Sahafi, S. Mehrabi, N.Dadkhai, "Low-Power and High-Performance I-bit CMOS Full Adder Cell",Journal of Computers, Academy Press, vol. 3, no. 2, Feb. 2008 J. Clerk Maxwell,
[3] N.West. K.Eshragian, Principles of CMOS V LSI Design: A systems Perspective, Addison-wesley, 1993..
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtractor [5] The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors
(ITRS), 2004. Available: http://public.itrs.net/
[6] R. Compañó, L. Molenkamp, and D.J. Paul (Eds.), “Technology
Roadmap for Nanoelectronics,” European Commission, IST
Programme, Future and Emerging Technologies,
Microelectronics Advanced Research Initiative MELARI
NANO, 2000. Available:
http://www.cordis.lu/esprit/src/melna-rm.htm
[7] D. J. Frank, “Power constrained CMOS scaling limits,” IBM J.
Res. & Dev., vol. 46, 2002, pp. 235–244.
[8] V. Beiu, U. Rückert, S. Roy, and J. Nyathi, “On nanoelectronic
architectural challenges and solutions,” Proc. IEEE Conf.
Nanotech. IEEE-NANO’04, Aug. 2004, pp. 628–631.