Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

86
Examples

Transcript of Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Page 1: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Examples

Page 2: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Equivalent Thickness

• When a thermoplastics is specified as a replacement for another material, the new part often needs to have the same stiffness as the old one

• Deflection is proportional to 1/E*I– E is modulus– I is moment of inertia– I is proportional to thickness3

Page 3: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Equivalent Thickness

Page 4: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Equivalent Thickness

Page 5: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Equivalent Thickness

Page 6: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Equivalent Thickness

• Calculate the thickness of a part that when made of polycarbonate will have the same deflection as a 0.75mm thick aluminum part at 73deg using moduli of the two materials

Page 7: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Equivalent Thickness

• Calculate the thickness of a part that when made of polycarbonate will have the same deflection as a 0.75mm thick aluminum part at 73deg using thickness conversion factors

Page 8: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Thermal Stress

• Thermal expansion and contraction are important considerations in plastic design

• Expansion-contraction problems often arise when two parts made of different materials having different coefficients of thermal expansion are assembled at temperatures other than the end use temperature

• When the assembled part goes into service in the end use environment, the materials react differently, resulting in thermal stress

Page 9: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Thermal Stress

• Thermal Stress can be calculated by:

Page 10: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Thermal Stress

Page 11: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Thermal Stress

Page 12: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Thermal Stress

• E = 300,000 psi for polycarbonate

• σ = 1000 psi

E

Page 13: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Alternate designs for park bench seat members• Example of the method a designer will use to

estimate bending stress, strain and deflections• Material is recycled polyolefin• Design for two people, 220lbs each, for 8 hours

per day• 10 year service life

Page 14: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 15: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Plastics have the advantage of durability, through coloring and design flexibility

• Plastics have the disadvantage of relatively low modulus values, particularly at elevated temperatures

• Designer must estimate the maximum stress and deflection for each of the proposed designs– Failure could result in personal injury

• Creep must be consider in the long term application

Page 16: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 17: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Support– The planks are beams resting on the bench

supports that have an unsupported length of 48 inches

– Support conditions at both ends exhibit characteristics of both simple and fixed supports

– A beam with simple supports represents the worst case for maximum possible mid-span stress and deflection

Page 18: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Loading conditions– Bench is loaded and unloaded periodically, not

continuous– Loading is intermittent rather than fatigue– Loads are static– Weight of the beam is of concern, due to creep– Assume 2 people, 220 lbs each, for 8 hour per

day distributed over the length of one beam

Page 19: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Loading conditions– Full recovery is assumed to occur overnight– The size of the continuous, uniformly

distributed load, due to the weight of the beam must be determined

– The deflection and stresses resulting from the intermittent external load are superimposed on the continuous uniformly distributed load caused by the weight of the beam

Page 20: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 21: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis• Equations

– Generalized equations for a beam with partially distributed loads and simple supports are

• At L/2• L length in inches• C distrance from the

neutral axis to surface• W is load in lbs/in• E is the materials modulus• I moment of inertia, in4

• M the bending moment, IELwy

LwM

IcM

m

m

mm

**384**5

8*

*

4

2

Page 22: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Service Environment– Used outdoors throughout the year– Used in various climates– Contacts various cleaners– Maximum service temperature is assumed to be

100ºF– Service life is ten years

Page 23: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Material Properties– In this application, the planks are loaded for

extended periods of time and creep effects must be taken into account

– The appropriate creep modulus is used in the maximum deflection equation

– The deflection and stress are due to both the beam weight and the external load

Page 24: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Material Properties– Maximum deflection will occur at the end of

the service life, 10 years, due to internal loading

• E = 2.5 x 105 psi– Maximum deflection will occur after 8 hours of

continuous loading due to the external load• E = 3 x 105 psi

Page 25: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 26: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 27: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• The external loading, uniformly distributed due to the weight of the two adults is the same for all four cases– we = 2*220lbs/48 inches = 9.17 lbs/in

• The internal load change in each case– wi = density*volume/length

• Solid = 0.46 lbs/in• Hollow = 0.22 lbs/in• Rib = 0.28 lbs/in• Foam = 0.37 lbs/in

Page 28: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 29: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 30: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

inchesy

ininy

y

y

yyy

Tm

Tm

im

em

imemTm

325.1)075.0()25.1(

)69.1)(000,250)(384()48)(46.0)(5(

)69.1)(000,300)(384()48)(2.9)(5(

nCalculatio n DeflectioMaximum

,

,

4

,

4

,

,,,

Page 31: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

222,

2

,

2

,

2

,

2

,

,,,

2

12306.581170

69.175.0*

8)48*46.0(

*8

)*(69.175.0*

8)48*2.9(

*8

)*(

* 8

)*(

nCalculatio Stress Maximum

inlbs

inlbs

inlbs

IcLw

IcLw

IcMLwM

Tm

im

iim

em

eem

imemTm

mmm

Page 32: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

Page 33: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Beam Analysis

• Comparisons– Solid is lowest in stress and deflection, but the material

and manufacturing costs are excessive and quality problems with voids and sink marks

– Hollow offers a 50% material savings, but only a 26% increase in deflection and 28% increase in stress

– Rib offers a 38% material savings and a 41% increase in deflection and 59% increase in stresses

– Foam offers a 20% material savings and 28% increase in deflection and 29% increase in stresses

Page 34: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Page 35: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• A living hinge is a thin flexible web of material that joins two rigid bodies together.

• A properly designed hinge molded out of the correct material will never fail.

• Long-life hinges are made from polypropylene or polyethylene.

• If the hinge is not expected to last forever, engineering resins like nylon and acetal can be used.

Page 36: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Figure: This polypropylene package for baby wipes utilizes a living hinge.

Page 37: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Before designing a living hinge, it is important to understand how the physical properties relate to the hinge design calculations.

• There are three types of hinges: – a fully elastic hinge, capable of flexing several

thousand cycles– a fully plastic hinge, capable of flexing only a few

cycles– and a combination of plastic elastic, capable of flexing

hundreds of times

Page 38: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Stress / Strain Curve

Strain

Stre

ss

Elastic Limit

Plastic RegionPlastic w ill not recover its original shape. A

living hinge designed in this region w ill not last long.

Elastic RegionPlastic w ill recover its original shape. Long life hinges are designed in this

region.

Ultimate (breaking) Strength

Yield Stress

Initial Modulus

Secant Modulus at Yield

Figure 1: Typical stress/strain curve for metals and some plastics.

Page 39: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge• When a living hinge is flexed, the hinge's plastic fibers

are stretched a certain amount, depending on its design. The amount of stretch is the crucial factor determining hinge life.

• To design a fully elastic hinge, the hinge's maximum strain must be in the elastic region of the curve; the plastic will fully recover its shape after a flex, and should last for many flexes.

• A plastic hinge design that experiences strain in the plastic region, will see permanent deformation, and will last only a few flexes.

Page 40: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Figure 2: Dimensions for a 180 polypropylene and polyethylene living hinge.

Figure 3: Dimensions for a right angle hinge.

Page 41: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Hinges designed for polypropylene and polyethylene should follow dimensional guidelines to create a fully elastic hinge that will last forever. – Figure 2 shows some general dimensions for a

properly designed living hinge. – Figure 3 shows dimensions for a right angle

hinge

Page 42: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Figure 4: This is an example of a poorly designed hinge with no recess. When bent, the absence of a recess creates a notch.

Figure 5: The recess on top of the hinge eliminates the notch when it is folded.

Page 43: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• The two major features of a living hinge are the recess on the top and the generous radius on the bottom.

• Figures 4 and 5 show the purpose of the recess.– Many hinges are designed without a recess; as a result,

when the hinge is bent 180, a notch is formed. This hinge design creates greater stress in the web, and the notch acts as a stress concentrator. Hinges designed this way will not last long.

– Figure 5 shows that with a recess, the notch is eliminated, and the web is able to fold over easier.

Page 44: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• The large radius on the bottom of hinge helps orient the polymer molecules as they pass through the hinge.

• Molecular orientation gives the hinge its strength and long life.

• Commonly, immediately after a hinge part is molded, the operator or a machine will flex the hinge a few quick times to orient the molecules while the part is still warm.

Page 45: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• The hinge dimensions for polyethylene and polypropylene are based on the materials' properties, including modulus, yield stress, yield strain, ultimate stress, and ultimate strain.

• Because other resins' properties vary widely, living hinge dimensions must be calculated for each particular resin.

• Figure 6 shows the dimensions that will be used in the calculations.

Page 46: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Basically, the calculations find the maximum strain in the hinge and compare it to the material properties.

• If the strain is below the elastic limit, the hinge will survive.

• If the strain is in the plastic region, the hinge will last a few cycles.

• If the strain is the past the breaking point, the hinge will fail.

Page 47: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Several simplifying assumptions are made, and tests have shown the assumptions are sound. – 1) The hinge bends in a circle and the neutral

axis coincides with the longitudinal hinge axis. – 2) The outer fiber is under maximum tension;

the inner fiber is under maximum compression. – 3) When the tension stress reaches the yield

point, the hinge will fail by the design criteria.

Page 48: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Refer to Figure 6.L1 = R (the perimeter of semicircle).L0 = (R + t)

Figure 6L1:Length of the hinge's neutral axist:Half the hinge's thicknessl:Hinge recessR:Hinge radiusL0:Length of the hinge's outer fibers

1

10bending L

L-Lε

Page 49: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Figure 6L1:Length of the hinge's neutral axist:Half the hinge's thicknessl:Hinge recessR:Hinge radiusL0:Length of the hinge's outer fibers bending

yieldsecant,1 σ

E tπL

bending1 ε

tπL

Page 50: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Elastic Hinge– In a fully elastic hinge design,

bending must be less than yield • and bending must be less than yield.

– Failure occurs when bending = yield

• and when bending=yield. – Either equation can be used, depending on

whether yield stress or strain is known.

Page 51: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• To use the equations, find the yield strain (yield), or the yield stress (yield) and secant modulus at yield (Esecant,

yield). • Substituting these values into the equations will result in

the lowest value of L1 that will yield an elastic hinge. • Either the hinge thickness or its length must be known

as well. • Generally, a minimum processing thickness is selected,

ranging from 0.008" to 0.015", and then a length is calculated.

Page 52: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Figure 6L1:Length of the hinge's neutral axist:Half the hinge's thicknessl:Hinge recessR:Hinge radiusL0:Length of the hinge's outer fibers

Figure 7: Hinge dimensions for calculations

Page 53: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Plastic Hinge:– A plastic hinge will only last a few cycles. – Cracks will probably start on the first flex.– Calculations for a plastic hinge are the same as those of

for an elastic hinge, except ultimate and ultimate are used.

ultimate1 ε

tπL ultimate

strength ultimatesecant,1 σ

E tπL

Page 54: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Processing Conditions– The key to living hinge life is to have the polymer

chains oriented perpendicular to the hinge as they cross it.

– As stated earlier, parts are generally flexed a few times immediately after molding to draw and further orient the hinge molecules.

– Another important factor in determining orientation is gate location.

• It is crucial to maintain a flow front as parallel to the living hinge as possible.

Page 55: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

Figure 9: An example of a poorly gated part.

Page 56: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge• Example of a properly gated

part. A wide flash gate is placed on one end to create a flat flow front when the plastic reaches the hinge.

• This results in even flow over the hinge, and provides proper orientation direction.

• Locating a gate at the center of one end of the part would be another suitable gate location.

Figure 10: A properly gated hinged part.

Page 57: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge• Material: Hoechst Celanese

Acetal Copolymer, Grade TX90 Unfilled High Impact

• Tensile Strength at Yield: 45 MPa

• Elongation at Yield: 15%• 2t (hinge thickness) = 0.012"• l (hinge recess) = 0.010"• This is a 180 hinge. • Find the minimum hinge length

for a fully elastic hinge.

Page 58: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• For a fully elastic hinge, the minimum hinge length is calculated using

• L1 = (t) / yield

• L1 = (0.006"*3.14159) / 0.15

• L1 = 0.126" for a fully elastic hinge

Page 59: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Material: Dupont Zytel 101 NC010 Nylon 66, Unfilled• Tensile Strength at Yield: 83 MPa• Elongation at Yield: 5%• Elongation at Break: 60%• 2t (hinge thickness) = 0.012"• l (hinge recess) = .010" • This hinge only has to bend 90. • Find the minimum hinge length for a fully elastic design.

Page 60: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Living Hinge

• Since the bend is 90, can be substituted with /2 (this can be found from the previous derivation).– L1 = (t/2) / yield

– L1 = (0.006"*3.14159*0.5) / 0.05

– L1 = 0.188"

• For a 180 bend, L1 would need to be 0.376".– This is probably not moldable. – Even 0.188" may be difficult to mold.

Page 61: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fits

Page 62: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Snap fits are the simplest, quickest and most cost effective method of assembling two parts

• When designed properly, parts with snap-fits can be assembled and disassembled numerous times without any adverse effect on the assembly.

• Snap-fits are also the most environmentally friendly form of assembly because of their ease of disassembly, making components of different materials easy to recycle.

Page 63: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

Page 64: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit• Most engineering material

applications with snap-fits use the cantilever design

• Other types of snap-fits which can be used are the “U“ or “L“ shaped cantilever snaps

• These are used when the strain of the straight cantilever snap cannot be designed below the allowable strain for the given material

Page 65: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• A typical snap-fit assembly consists of a cantilever beam with an overhang at the end of the beam

• The depth of the overhang defines the amount of deflection during assembly.

Page 66: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit• The overhang typically has a

gentle ramp on the entrance side and a sharper angle on the retraction side.

• The small angle at the entrance side (α) helps to reduce the assembly effort, while the sharp angle at the retraction side (α“) makes disassembly very difficult or impossible depending on the intended function.

• Both the assembly and disassembly force can be optimized by modifying the angles mentioned above.

Page 67: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• The main design consideration of a snap-fit is integrity of the assembly and strength of the beam.

• The integrity of the assembly is controlled by the stiffness (k) of the beam and the amount of deflection required for assembly or disassembly.

• Rigidity can be increased either by using a higher modulus material (E) or by increasing the cross sectional moment of inertia (I) of the beam.

• The product of these two parameters (EI) will determine the total rigidity of a given beam length.

Page 68: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• The integrity of the assembly can also be improved by increasing the overhang depth.

• As a result, the beam has to deflect further and, therefore, requires a greater effort to clear the overhang from the interlocking hook.

• However, as the beam deflection increases, the beam stress also increases.

• This will result in a failure if the beam stress is above the yield strength of the material.

Page 69: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Thus, the deflection must be optimized with respect to the yield strength or strain of the material.

• This is achieved by optimizing the beam section geometry to ensure that the desired deflection can be reached without exceeding the strength or strain limit of the material.

Page 70: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• The assembly and disassembly force will increase with both stiffness (k) and maximum deflection of the beam (Y).

• The force (P) required to deflect the beam is proportional to the product of the two factors:– P= kY

• The stiffness value (k) depends on beam geometry

Page 71: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Stress or strain is induced by the deflection (Y)

• The calculated stress or strain value should be less than the yield strength or the yield strain of the material in order to prevent failure

Page 72: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Cantilever beam: deflection-strain formulas

Page 73: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Cantilever beam: deflection-strain formulas

Page 74: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Cantilever beam: deflection-strain formulas

Page 75: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• The cantilever beam formulas used in conventional snap-fit design underestimate the amount of strain at the beam/wall interface because they do not include the deformation in the wall itself.

• Instead, they assume the wall to be completely rigid with the deflection occurring only in the beam.

• This assumption may be valid when the ratio of beam length to thickness is greater than about 10:1.

Page 76: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• However, to obtain a more accurate prediction of total allowable deflection and strain for short beams, a magnification factor should be applied to the conventional formula.

• This will enable greater flexibility in the design while taking full advantage of the strain-carrying capability of the material.

Page 77: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• A method for estimating these deflection magnification factors for various snap-fit beam/wall configurations has been developed

• The results of this technique, which have been verified both by finite element analysis and actual part testing, are shown graphically

• Also shown are similar results for beams of tapered cross section (beam thickness decreasing by 1/2 at the tip).

Page 78: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples
Page 79: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples
Page 80: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples
Page 81: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples
Page 82: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Determine:– The maximum

deflection of snap– The mating force

Page 83: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• The maximum deflection of snap

Page 84: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• The mating force

Page 85: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Is this type of snap fit acceptable for nylon 6?

Page 86: Design Chapter 4. Design Calculation Examples

Snap Fit

• Solution