Delivery systems for fungal control agents -
Transcript of Delivery systems for fungal control agents -
Roy BatemanInternational Pesticide Application Research Centre,
Adrian Arnold, Cleber Bonina, Prakash Hebbar, Belinda Luke, Alan Pomella, Givaldo Niella
Delivery systems for fungal control agents(emphasising the importance of production quality control)
RPB delsys_cocoa: v.1.2
12 years of development (and £10.2 M)
The importance of:n Identifying truly effective isolates
n Laboratory to fieldn Delivery systems, “enabling technologies”
n “Pre-field” test design, field trial programme
n Field to marketplace
Product development
Scientific research
Practical verification
“Enabling technologies” derived form the LUBILOSA Programme
n Techniques for identification of virulent isolatesn Mass production systems: pilot and commercialn Spore separation and packaging
n Formulations (oil-based and others)
n Application methods
n Storage techniques and models
n Field testing techniques
n Registration and licensing
Management of invasive cocoa diseases
using Trichoderma spp.... and others?Phytophthora megakarya
Crinipellis spp.
C. roreri C. perniciosa
… a promising biological agent for diseases caused by Crinipellis spp.
Trichoderma stromaticum
(with Hypocrea stromatica)
lumpy
Delivery systems …
The Nozzlehead view:
biopesticides are all just particles that must be delivered to their biological target as evenly and effectively as possible
The evil Dr. Mucus Spleen
©D
avid
Par
kins
… Preferably as single conidian Stokes’ law (particle size most important):
n Prevent settling in spray tankn Easier to formulate
n Optimise dispersion in spray droplet spectrum (therefore on the target)
D2 - 23
0
5
10
15
10 100 1000droplet diameter (µm)
% in
32
size
cla
sses
stromata
Aerial conidia are robust and effective
2 stage process, with grains (often rice) in bagstime consuming, expensive but …
Existing preparation
• Low particle size quality (nozzle blockage)
• Ground up rice: difficult to dry
• Poor shelf life
Need the spores not the substrate!
application
Inoculationand fermentation
formulationpacked in
polyethylenebags
Drying and grinding
pre-mix
dilution withwater
Production - delivery sequence (T. stromaticum)
application
Inoculationand fermentation
Surface drying only
dilution
Production - delivery: upgrade
Surface drying only
improved formulationsand/or adjuvants?
Thorough drying andpackaging (foil sachets)
Spore separation
Formulations
n Provisional (using adjuvants?)
n Optimised (higher technology: OF, WG?)
n Requirements:Stable, evenly dispersed TC, small particles (individual conidia?)
Particle size analysis
T. stromaticum MH III (CEPLAC)(suspension in water)
0
25
50
75
100
1 10 100
particle diameter (µm)
cum
ula
tive
% in
cla
ss
MH3: sample 1
MH3: sample 2
Laboratory prototype
T. stromaticum (FA 64) MH4(suspension in water)
0
25
50
75
100
1 10 100
particle diameter (µm)
cum
ula
tive
% in
cla
ss
FA64, Mk IV,Plate 0FA64, Mk IV,Plate 5
log10 σ = KE - Cwlog10m - CHt - CQt2
KE (6.3) absolute longevity extrapolated from value of log10 σσ at 1% mc
Cw (3.06) describes effect of mc on longevity
CH (0.00176) and CQ (0.000703) describe the effect of
temperature on longevity
t temperature
m moisture content (% wb)
Shelf life model (Hong et al.)
Model verification (Metarhizium)
a
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
b
0 20 40 60 80 100
3 years
up to 1year
6 years
4years
5 years2years
Predicted viability (%)
Actual Viability (%)
Act
ual
Via
bili
ty %
Conclusions
n The surface properties of T. stromaticum are unusual, having both hydrophilic and lipophiliccomponents
n Major sources of variation should be removed when Trichoderma spp. and similar fungi, are separated as single conidia using the ‘MycoHarvester’. This has significant implications for:- formulation- storage- ease of application …
n … and therefore experimental results.