DEA Presentation 100316
Transcript of DEA Presentation 100316
The Relevance of the Most Irrelevant
BHA and Drillstring Component(Why I decided to mess with the conventional blade stabiliser)
Tom Newman
March 10th 2016
Directional Problems
BAT-2 Downhole Dynamics
Poor BHA response, energy transfer & MWD Interference
BHA DamageMWD/LWD, PDM, RSS failures, excessive stabiliser wear
Poor Hole QualityPoor energy transfer, trip time (ledges), csg running issues
Vibration Related Issues
Whirl as Shape
Is a sine wave
Bit tilted by wave, reduces ROP & increases MSE
Shape crosses wellbore = quiet (nodes)
Mechanical Specific Energy best indicator
Source: Fred Dupriest, Thus the Lowly Stabiliser
Final Retention System
An integral, interference fit pin, with precision radii and a locking bolt array
Run History
Run in Dutch North Sea, UAE, KSA, France, Turkey, and Belgium
Less balling up, stick/slip, vibration & little wear with more stable torque. All other BHA components in good condition.
Wells drilled 20
Hours drilled> 7,000 hrs
Meters drilled> 56,000m / 183,000ft
Case History:
Weight Transfer & Less Balling
Dutch North Sea
OBJECTIVE:16" hole section 659m - 1,566mMotor BHA (1.15° ABH) + 2 x Switchblades 15" & 15 ¼"Build to and hold @ 25˚ inclination
CONCERNS:Packing offBalling
Case History:
Weight Transfer & Less Balling
DRILLING OBSERVATIONS:
No motor stalls
No hanging up
Good tool face control
POOH OBSERVATIONS:
No clay ball problems
No packing off
Case History:
Weight Transfer & Less Balling
Western Gulf Region
OBJECTIVE:8 1/2" hole section 6,428ft – 9,598ftMotor BHA (1.50° ABH) + 1 x Fixedblade 7 7/8" (8") Hold horizontal with azimuthal left turn @ 27˚
CONCERNS:Sliding ROPTorque levels
Case History:
Weight Transfer & Less Balling
Run Results (Spiralblade vs. Fixedblade)Backflow induced packing off (L0 above)
Minimal surface weight transfer / hang upPOOH No motor stalls