Data viewer improvement

17
Fusion Utilization Fusion Utilization Improvement Improvement Gap improvement in Standby Time Analsys from ACS. Fusion in FTF by C. S.Tu

description

 

Transcript of Data viewer improvement

Page 1: Data viewer improvement

Fusion Utilization ImprovementFusion Utilization Improvement

Gap improvement in Standby Time Analsys from ACS.

Fusion in FTF by C.S.Tu

Page 2: Data viewer improvement

All down mode AnalysisAll down mode Analysis

All downmode analsys in Aug,2002 .

7 Type當13%

6 系統當11%

3 Standby7%

4 Calibration9%

5 Engineering工11%

10 Other8%

8 Handler Down5%

13 Unstable14%

11 Change Type5%

18 ACS Down0%

14 Handler Unstable1%

2 No record of downUnknown down

16%

Compared with all down rates ,unknown down is the top one .

Page 3: Data viewer improvement

Compared with standby time Compared with standby time

Standby Time Status in Aug, 2002

Small down27%

Idle7%

Others10%

Handler/Prober Cal./PM

0%

Unknowndown34% Handler/

Prober down6%

Type down16%

1.Unknow down occupy 34% of standby time.

2.Small down occupy 27% of standby time.

.

Page 4: Data viewer improvement

Small down HappenSmall down Happen

1.It happen when production stop over 2 minutes.

2.Each problem happened will casue small

stop first, why ?

Small stopACS

Unknownstop

System down

Handler down

?Type down

orWhen do you found problem ?

t

Page 5: Data viewer improvement

Small down v.s OthersSmall down v.s OthersThe relativity of top six down modes .

Small down 27%

Unknow down 34% System Down

TypeDown 16%Handler

downOther &Idle 7%

Page 6: Data viewer improvement

Type Down AnalysisType Down Analysis OneC 4058XH have more problem with Fusion.

VP223445%

VP405542%

VP4058135%

VP405846%

OM635X15%

PCD80XXH13%

PCF506011%

PCF508729%

PCF8775014%

Page 7: Data viewer improvement

System Down System Down

Hardware fail :

PECHF,FARMNT,DPS,PSCM…

Hang problem.

Hardware hang, bad die hang &

software hang …

Page 8: Data viewer improvement

System Down AnalysisSystem Down Analysis

System Down in Aug, 2002

summary out22%

PowerCut2%

Teste down11%

Vaccum Source1%

Tester Hang64%

75% Casued by printer without paper ,and wait for processing (hang).

Compared with system down.

Page 9: Data viewer improvement

Handler Down Handler Down TESEC handlers loader have more problem 38% in Aug.

Handler down in Aug,2002

Pin bend problem6%

Socket problem0%

Peripheral problemofhandler

4%Index abnormal

20%

Handler temperatureproblem

7%

Handler test areaproblem

6%

Unloader problem19%

Loader problem38%

Page 10: Data viewer improvement

Unknown Down Unknown Down

Unknow down occupy 34% of standby time in ACS.

Why we don’t know it down ?

No one found it .

No down happened .

or Other …

Page 11: Data viewer improvement

Cause Analysis & Team membersCause Analysis & Team members

UnknowStop from handler

Unknow Stop from Type

Unknow Stop from System

Small Stop

OneC have more 40%Of type down 13%:40581H occupy 35%

(40575 WT)40584 6%

Om635X 15%

Handler down 5%And Unstable 1%

Loader problem occupy38% of all handler

problem

System down have 11% of all down mode:Hang have 64 % of

system down.

C.S TuPeace LinJ.R Wang

Page 12: Data viewer improvement

Hang problem Hang problem Production hang . Double dataviewers casue test time longer.

(Need support from System,C.S.Tu and Vendor)

MS_Dlog could not worte (OneC DC log). (Need support from CSTD, Peace.Lin & BL)

Fail die casue hang (OneC). (Need support from CSTD. Peace.Lin & BL)

Hardware hang . Load board casued it hung when failed TXD1. (Need support from CSTD. Peace.Lin )

Hardware configuration miss. (Need support from System,C.S.Tu and Vendor)

Page 13: Data viewer improvement

Secondary dataviewers problemSecondary dataviewers problem Why Fusion processes have two dataviewers? 1. Normally only one work with optool , but when test program was unloaded , it still exited .Next launcher command be run , a new dataviewer will popup. 2. It casue test time longer than default for all types. For example : OneC > 1.5 times (normally dual sites 8.5sec ,become 12.8sec , but not always)

3. It influence output . 4. A bug of OS.

Page 14: Data viewer improvement

Two dataviewers delay test time Two dataviewers delay test time ==== :fusion12 dataviewer monitor : =============================prod 1529 1 50 19:52:07 ? 236:51 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:1480:head_1 -tester fusion12 -head 1prod 6240 6190 0 10:24:22 ? 0:01 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:6190:head_1 -tester fusion12 -head 1prod 6190 1 0 10:24:14 ? 0:03 optool -head 1 -load /tp/devices/vp40581h_R1084/V09/Prog/vp40581H_V09.eva \time Thu Jul 25 11:10:21 CST 2002==== :fusion09 dataviewer monitor : =============================preprod 18666 1 50 15:37:56 ? 314:31 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:preprod:18628:head_1 -tester fusion09 -head prod 22120 22072 0 05:49:49 ? 0:02 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:22072:head_1 -tester fusion09 -head 1prod 22072 1 0 05:49:40 ? 0:13 optool -head 1 -load /tp/devices/pcf50872_R1084/V1E/019/Prog/pcf50872-V1E_019.e Thu Jul 25 11:10:32 CST 2002==== :fusion13 dataviewer monitor : =============================envdiag 11442 11428 0 09:15:22 pts/3 0:07 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:envdiag:11428:head_1 -tester fusion13 -head prod 9532 1 42 16:10:57 ? 829:14 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:9482:head_1 -tester fusion13 -head 1prod 10499 1 32 18:52:10 ? 90:37 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:10449:head_1 -tester fusion13 -head 1

This the one caused longer test time in Fusion .

This the one caused longer test time in Fusion .

Page 15: Data viewer improvement

How serious is it ?How serious is it ?

Users Happen Times

Week\User Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm Others

Week227 27 4 3 1 3 1 2 2

Week228 32 7 5 0 2 0 1 1

Week229 20 5 2 0 5 1 1 0

Week230 25 1 3 0 1 1 1 1

July,2002 total 104 17 13 1 11 3 5 4

Users Happen Times

Week\User Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm Others

Week227 27 4 3 1 3 1 2 2

Week228 32 7 5 0 2 0 1 1

Week229 20 5 2 0 5 1 1 0

Week230 25 1 3 0 1 1 1 1

July,2002 total 104 17 13 1 11 3 5 4

• FTF would have more problems than WTF, because it happened

when one exit optool after unload TP .

These with records!!!

Page 16: Data viewer improvement

The result after using pkill before PlThe result after using pkill before Pload oad

Short-term solution :

a .Kill the process before next optool popup automatically .

b. Two dataviewer prevention process was execute in Aug,2002 week 231.

Long-term solution :

Vendor’s SPR and improvement of OS are necessary.

Week\User Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm* Week231(Aug/1 ) 9 1 2 0 1 0 1

Week232 6 1 1 0 0 0 0Week233 4 0 2 0 0 0 1Week234 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Week235 0 1 1 0 0 0 0July total 19 3 7 0 1 0 2

Page 17: Data viewer improvement

Improvement result and TargetImprovement result and Target

Dataviewer casue long test time

1713

1

113 5 43 0 1 0 2 2

104

7

19

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

User account

SecondaryDataviewer

happenTimes

No Pkill 104 17 13 1 11 3 5 4

Pkill 19 3 7 0 1 0 2 2

Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm Others

• Finally target is no secondary dataviewer found .

• Compared to with pkill and without pkill.