Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop
description
Transcript of Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop
![Page 1: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop
Paul Bambrick-Santoyo
![Page 2: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
P2
• In the face of great adversity, how did the Houston team respond?
• What key statements and actions helped the team save Apollo 13?
APOLLO 13
![Page 3: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
P3
GROUND RULES
• EVERY CHALLENGE IS REAL & UNIQUE
• THE EXPERTS ARE IN THE ROOM
• WE ABSOLUTELY CAN FIND SOLUTIONS TO ANY PROBLEM
• NO ISLANDS ALLOWED
• BOTTOM LINE: IMPROVE ACHIEVEMENT
• ACT NOW TO BE READY FOR TOMORROW
![Page 4: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
P4
![Page 5: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
P5
![Page 6: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
P6
OFF-RAMPS ON THE ACHIEVEMENT HIGHWAY
• Unaligned interim assessments
• No structured time in school day
• Infrequent interim assessments
• Externally analyzed
• No analysis done by teachers
• Re-teaching is stabbing in the dark
• No follow-up: no action
![Page 7: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
P7
DATA-DRIVEN INSTRUCTION AT ITS ESSENCE:
ASSESSMENTSANALYSIS
ACTIONin a Data-driven CULTURE
THE FOUR KEYS:
![Page 8: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
P8
PRINCIPLES FOR EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENTS:
COMMON INTERIM:• At least quarterly• Common across all teachers of the same grade level
DEFINE THE STANDARDS—ALIGNED TO:• To state test (format, content, & length)• To instructional sequence (curriculum)• To college-ready expectations
ASSESSMENTS:
![Page 9: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
P9
PRINICIPLES FOR EFFECTIVE ASSESSMENTS:REASSESSES:
• Standards that appear on the first interim assessment appear again on subsequent interim assessments
WRONG ANSWERS: • Illuminate misunderstanding
TRANSPARENT:• Teachers see the assessments in advance
ASSESSMENTS:
![Page 10: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
P10
DATA-DRIVEN INSTRUCTION AT ITS ESSENCE:
ASSESSMENTS (Interim, Aligned, Reassess, Transparent)
ANALYSIS
ACTION
in a Data-driven CULTURE
THE FOUR KEYS:
![Page 11: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
P11
• IMMEDIATE: Ideal 48 hrs, max 1 wk turnaround
• BOTTOM LINE: Includes analysis at question level, standards level and overall—how well did the students do as a whole
• TEST-IN-HAND analysis: Teacher & instructional leader together
• TEACHER-OWNED analysis
• DEEP: Moves beyond “what” to “why”
ANALYSIS:
![Page 12: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
P12
ASSESSMENTS (Aligned, Interim, Reassess, Transparent)
ANALYSIS(Quick, Bottom line, Teacher-owned, Test-in-hand, Deep)
ACTION
in a Data-driven CULTURE
THE FOUR KEYS:
![Page 13: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
P13
• PLAN new lessons based on data analysis
• ACTION PLAN: Implement what you plan (dates, times, standards & specific strategies)
• LESSON PLANS: Observe changes in lesson plans
• ACCOUNTABILITY: Observe changes classroom observations, in-class assessments
• ENGAGED STUDENTS: Know end goal, how they did, and what actions they’re taking to improve
ACTION:
![Page 14: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
P14
ASSESSMENTS (Aligned, Interim, Reassess, Transparent)
ANALYSIS(Quick, Bottom line, Teacher-owned, Test-in-hand, Deep)
ACTION(Action Plan, Accountability, Engaged)
in a Data-driven CULTURE
THE FOUR KEYS:
![Page 15: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
P15
• VISION: Established by leaders and repeated relentless
• “REAL” LEADERSHIP TEAM: Trained and highly active
• CALENDAR: Calendar in advance with built-in time for assessments, analysis & action
• PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Aligned
DATA-DRIVEN CULTURE:
![Page 16: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
P16
ASSESSMENTS (Aligned, Interim, Reassess, Transparent)
ANALYSIS(Quick, Bottom line, Teacher-owned, Test-in-hand, Deep)
ACTION(Action Plan, Accountability, Engaged)
in a Data-driven CULTURE (Vision, Leadership, Calendar, PD)
THE FOUR KEYS:
![Page 17: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Phases of Data-Driven Instruction & Interim Assessments
Adapted, Research by Camden County, GA Public School District
![Page 18: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
P18
IGNORANCE, CONFUSION, OVERLOAD:• “I don’t understand what we’re doing.”
• “This is too much! How am I really supposed to use all this?”
• “All this analysis! What’s wrong with just grading the old-fashioned way?”
• “Uh? Interim assessments? What are those?”
PHASE 1
![Page 19: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
P19
FEELING INADEQUATE & DISTRUSTFUL:• “How can two questions on a test possible establish
mastery? These tests can never measure what I know about my students’ learning.”
• “This idea of an assessment is terrible! We don’t teach like that format! We teach it this way.”
PHASE 2
![Page 20: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
P20
CHALLENGING THE TEST:• “Question #26 is a poor question. Answer “b” is a trick
answer.”
• “Question #11 is too hard. We need to make it easier.”
• “The kids made silly mistakes because of the pressure of this pointless test. They know this stuff.”
• Undertone: “I’ve never looked at a test item before, but I’m going to now if you’re going to hold me accountable.”
PHASE 3
![Page 21: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
P21
ANALYTICAL but SUPERFICIAL:• “They just don’t do well on word problems. I just need to
do more word problems.”
• “They just don’t read enough. I’ll get them to read more.”
PHASE 4
![Page 22: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
P22
LOOKING FOR CAUSES, BUT NO ACTION:• “These wrong answers tell me that they don’t know the
difference between a summary and a theme.”
• “I always taught grammar in isolation, and this test asked for it in a more authentic form.”
• The problem with solving algebraic equations for them was actually the inability to subtract negative integers.”
PHASE 5
![Page 23: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
P23
CHANGING TEACHING PRACTICES:• Teachers follow through on analysis
• Lesson plans reflect spiraling, re-teaching, etc.
• Teachers look for best practices outside of their own classroom
PHASE 6
![Page 24: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
P24
• Phase 1: Ignorance, confusion and overload—“This is too much!”
• Phase 2: Feeling inadequate and distrustful—“This test is terrible!”
• Phase 3: Challenging the test—“Question 26 was too hard—a trick question.”
• Phase 4: Analytical but superficial
• Phase 5: Looking for causes, no action
• Phase 6: Changing teaching practices
Phases of Interim Assessment Implementation
![Page 25: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Self-Evaluation:Implementation of Data-Driven
Instruction
![Page 26: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The Big Balloons:Challenges We Face
![Page 27: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
P27
1. NEVER LEFT THE STATION: I’m overwhelmed and/or frustrated; where do I begin?
2. NO TEACHER BUY-IN: How do I get teachers/leaders invested?
3. SURFACE TEACHER BUY-IN, LATER RESISTANCE: I thought they got it, but now they’re resisting. What do I do?
4. UNSUPPORTIVE MENTOR PRINCIPAL:What real results can I accomplish in this context?
5. STUDENT/PARENT BUY-IN: How do you get them invested in this process?
6. NO LEADERSHIP TEAM BUY-IN: How do I deal with a leadership team that doesn’t believe in the power of data-driven instruction?
CHALLENGES:
![Page 28: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
P28
7. RUNNING TEAM MEETINGS: How do I limit the impact of a negative teacher who’s trying to undermine the process? How do I bring experienced and novice teachers together effectively?
8. CITY/SCHOOL ASSESSMENTS ARE POOR: How do I adapt to mandatory weak assessments that aren’t aligned to state test?
9. CREATING ASSESSMENTS:How do I access quality interim assessment material? How do I build assessments for other subjects or that align to college readiness?
10. ANALYZING RESULTS: What effective templates are working? How do I alleviate time drain? Where do I begin when most standards are deficient?
CHALLENGES:
![Page 29: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
P29
11. TARGETED RE-TEACH—HOW?: What are effective strategies to reach mastery? How do I do differentiated instruction with teachers who can’t manage their class or haven’t done small groups before?
12. TIME:How do I creatively manage our school schedule to implement all aspects of data-driven instruction? How do I gain time for analysis/action if I cannot extend their day?
13. COMPETING INTERESTS: What are ways to implement data-driven instruction when there are so many other initiatives in the school?
14. “GOOD SCHOOLS/TEACHERS” PROBLEM: What are some strategies for getting staff on board who already have “good scores”? How do I create urgency?
15. ADJUSTING CALENDAR: How can I adjust the original NLNS data-driven calendar when I’m really just starting now? How do I work around a poor school calendar that isn’t what my school needs?
CHALLENGES:
![Page 30: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Results Meeting ProtocolSummer Foundations Review
![Page 31: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
P31
• IDENTIFY ROLES: Timer, facilitator, recorder (2 min) • IDENTIFY OBJECTIVE to focus on (2 min or given)• WHAT WORKED SO FAR (5 min)
• [Or: What teaching strategies did you try so far]• CHIEF CHALLENGES (5 min)• BRAINSTORM proposed solutions (10 min)
• [See protocol on next page]• REFLECTION: Feasibility of each idea (5 min)
• CONSENSUS around best actions (15 min)• [See protocol on next page]
• PUT IN CALENDAR: When will the tasks happen? When will the teaching happen? (10 min)
ACTION: RESULTS MEETING 50 MIN TOTAL
![Page 32: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
P32
RESULTS MEETING STRUCTURE:PROTOCOLS FOR BRAINSTORMING/CONSENSUSPROTOCOL FOR BRAINSTORMING:• Go in order around the circle: each person has 30 seconds to
share a proposal.• If you don’t have an idea, say “Pass.” • No judgments should be made; if you like the idea, when it’s
your turn simply say, “I would like to add to that idea by…”• Even if 4-5 people pass in a row, keep going for the full
brainstorming time.
PROTOCOL FOR REFLECTION:• 1 minute—silent personal/individual reflection on the list: what
is doable and what isn’t for each person.• Go in order around the circle once: Depending on size of group
each person has 30-60 seconds to share their reflections.• If a person doesn’t have a thought to share, say “Pass” and
come back to that person later.• No judgments should be made.
![Page 33: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
P33
RESULTS MEETING STRUCTURE:PROTOCOLS FOR BRAINSTORMING/CONSENSUSPROTOCOL FOR CONSENSUS/ACTION PLAN:• ID key actions from brainstorming that everyone will agree to
implement• Make actions as specific as possible within the limited time• ID key student/teacher guides or tasks needed to be done to
be ready to teach—ID who will do each task • Spend remaining time developing concrete elements of lesson
plan:• Do Now’s• Teacher guides (e.g., what questions to ask the students or
how to structure the activity)• Student guides• HW, etc.
NOTE: At least one person (if not two) should be recordingeverything electronically to send to the whole group
![Page 34: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Adjusted Results Meeting: Best Practice Sharing
![Page 35: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
P35
• Divide into subgroups (if large enough group): ID specific challenges each group will address (2 min)
SUBGROUPS:• Identify roles: Timer, facilitator, recorder, electronic copier
(2 min) • Share best practices Ask follow-up questions to
understand success (3-5 min each; 20 min)
• Imagine challenges others are having: Contemplate if your experience addresses those challenges (5 min)
• Consensus around best actions to “publish”: Make plans for what you can do in 30 min (10 min)
• Publish: Produce dazzling display of best practices and put on the wall around your balloon (20 min)
• Select a representative: Pick one expert to stay as guide
1 HR TOTALBEST PRACTICES SHARING:
![Page 36: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Adjusted Results Meeting: Finding Solutions to Our Challenges
![Page 37: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
P37
FACING OUR CHALLENGES: FINDING SOLUTIONS
GROUP:• Identify roles (2 min)• Read through artifacts on the wall (10 min)• Share the challenges you are having (10 min)• Identify the best practices that would be useful for your context
(5 min)• Brainstorm how to make those practices 100% applicable to
your school building (5 min)
INDIVIDUAL:• Write concrete plan for your school upon return from workshop
(18 min)
50 MIN TOTAL
![Page 38: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Popping the Balloons:SOLVING All Challenges
![Page 39: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Analysis & Action:The Role of Leadership
![Page 40: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
P40
ASSESSMENTS (Aligned, Interim, Reassess, Transparent)
ANALYSIS(Quick, Bottom line, Teacher-owned, Test-in-hand, Deep)
ACTION(Action Plan, Accountability, Engaged)
in a Data-driven CULTURE (Vision, Leadership, Calendar, PD)
THE FOUR KEYS:
![Page 41: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Effective Analysis MeetingsVideo Case Studies
![Page 42: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
P42
IDENTIFY TEACHER LANGUAGE/ANALYSIS/ACTION:• What does the teacher say?• What preparation did they do for the meeting?• What was the quality of her analysis and what do you infer
about the quality of the follow-up action taken with her students?
OBSERVER #1: ANALYZE TEACHER’S ROLE
![Page 43: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
P43
GUIDING QUESTIONS—PRINCIPAL ANALYSIS GROUP:• What does the principal say? • How does he respond to teacher comments (and to what
does he choose NOT to respond)?• What are the tips you could take about leading analysis
meetings?
OBSERVER #2: ANALYZE PRINCIPAL’S ROLE
![Page 44: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
P44
GUIDING QUESTIONS FOR SYSTEMS ANALYSIS GROUP:• What data-driven systems are in place at the school that are
apparent in this meeting?• What preparation did the principal do to make this meeting
effective?• Are there additional systems or preparation that could make
the meeting more effective?
OBSERVER #3: ANALYZE SYSTEMS & PREPARATION
![Page 45: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Addressing Resistance in Analysis Meetings
Role Plays
![Page 46: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
P46
• 6 WEEKS PRIOR TO INTERIM ASSESSMENTS: Teachers review assessment and plan toward the rigor of those assessments(TRANSPARENCY)
• A FEW WEEKS PRIOR: Teachers predict performance on each assessment question: a) confident they’ll get it right; b) not sure; c) no way they’ll get it right(TEST-IN-HAND, TEACHER-OWNED)
• PD (timing flexible): Teachers receive model of how to do assessment analysis and complete action plan, and they see model of effective & ineffective analysis meetings(PROF DEVT, DEEP)
PRECURSORS TO EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS MTGS: BEFORE GIVING INTERIM ASSESSMENT
![Page 47: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
P47
• TEACHER ANALYSIS: Teachers do analysis of results prior to meeting, answering the fundamental question: WHY did the students not learn it? (TEACHER-OWNED, DEEP)
• TEACHER ACTION PLAN: Teachers complete an action plan (ACTION PLAN, ACCOUNTABILITY)
• LEADERSHIP ANALYSIS: Leader analyzes teacher results in preparation for the meeting (LEADERSHIP)
• REVIEW OF TEACHER PLAN: Leader collects teacher action plan/analysis ahead of time to see if it looks acceptable (LEADERSHIP, ACCOUNTABILITY)
• CONTENT EXPERTISE: Leader has a plan ready to access content experts if the problems are beyond own expertise (PROF DEVT)
PRECURSORS TO EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS MTGS: AFTER INTERIM ASSESSMENT GIVEN
![Page 48: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
P48
• Let the data do the talking
• Let the teacher do the talking (or get them to!)
• Always go back to the test and back to specific questions
• Don’t fight the battles on ideological lines (you’re going to lose)
• There’s a difference between the first assessment and the third
• You’ve got to know the data yourself to have an effective meeting
• Make sure it’s connected to a concrete plan that you can verify
TIPS FOR EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS MEETINGS:
![Page 49: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
P49
HELPFUL STARTERS FOR ANALYSIS MEETINGS:• “So…what’s the data telling you?”• “Congratulations on the improvement from last time in x
area! You must be really proud of their growth here.”• “So the _____ [paraphrase their frustration: the test was
hard, the students were difficult, etc.]? I’m sorry to hear that. So where should we begin with our action plan moving forward?”
ANALYSIS MEETING HELPFUL PHRASES:
![Page 50: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
P50
DATA-FOCUSING FOR ANALYSIS MEETINGS:• “So let’s look at question 18…..Why do you think they got it
wrong?”• “You know, I thought it might be a silly mistake, but what
surprised me is that they did really well on questions x & y. Why do you think they did so well on these questions and yet not on your original question?"
• “Let’s look at question 11. What did the students need to be able to do to answer that question effectively? Is this more than they are able to do with you in your class?”
• [When new ideas occur or deeper analysis is done at the meeting than what teacher did previously] “So let’s re-visit the action plan you created and see how we can incorporate these additional ideas.”
ANALYSIS MEETING HELPFUL PHRASES:
![Page 51: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
P51
ASSESSMENTS—QUESTIONS ON QUADRATIC EQUATIONS:
1. Solve the following quadratic equation:
2. Given the following rectangle with the lengths shown below, find the value of x:
3. You need to build a box where one side of the bottom of the box is one foot less than two times the length of the other and the total area of the bottom of the box is 6 ft2. What should the length & width dimensions of your box be?
062 2 xx
12 x
x
Area = 6
![Page 52: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
If You Had to Choose:Time Management Exercise
Kim Marshall’s Case Study
![Page 53: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
P53
• FULL OBSERVATION: Observe & evaluate teachers with pre-conference, full-class observation, detailed write-up, and post-conference
• TARGETED WALKTHROUGHS: Systematic walk-throughs focused on target areas (student work, engagement, objectives, binders, worksheets)
• MINI-OBSERVATIONS: Mini-observations of 3-5 classrooms each day (5-15 minutes per visit) with face-to-face follow-up conversation
• GLOBAL WALK-THROUGHS: Walk through all classrooms each day (1-5 minutes each class)
IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE THREE:
![Page 54: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
P54
IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE THREE:
• LESSON PLAN REVIEW: Collecting & checking teachers’ lesson plans each week, with dialogue sheet for teacher-to-principal conversation
• UNIT PLAN CREATION: Supervising teachers & teams to submit common curriculum unit plans in advance
• INTERIM ASSESSMENT LAUNCH: Managing teachers & teams to use interim assessments to plan whole-group and individual instruction
![Page 55: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
P55
• FULL OBSERVATION: Observe & evaluate teachers with pre-conference, full-class observation, detailed write-up, and post-conference
• TARGETED WALK-THROUGHS: Systematic walk-throughs focused on target areas (student work, engagement, objectives, binders, worksheets)
• MINI-OBSERVATIONS: Mini-observations of 3-5 classrooms each day (5-15 minutes per visit) with face-to-face follow-up conversation
• GLOBAL WALK-THROUGHS: Walk through all classrooms each day (1-5 minutes each class)
IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE THREE:
![Page 56: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
P56
IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE THREE:
• LESSON PLAN REVIEW: Collecting & checking teachers’ lesson plans each week, with dialogue sheet for teacher-to-principal conversation
• UNIT PLAN CREATION: Supervising teachers & teams to submit common curriculum unit plans in advance
• INTERIM ASSESSMENT LAUNCH: Managing teachers & teams to use interim assessments to plan whole-group and individual instruction
![Page 57: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
P57
• FULL OBSERVATION: Observe & evaluate teachers with pre-conference, full-class observation, detailed write-up, and post-conference
• TARGETED WALK-THROUGHS: Systematic walk-throughs focused on target areas (student work, engagement, objectives, binders, worksheets)
• MINI-OBSERVATIONS: Mini-observations of 3-5 classrooms each day (5-15 minutes per visit) with face-to-face follow-up conversation
• GLOBAL WALK-THROUGHS: Walk through all classrooms each day (1-5 minutes each class)
IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE THREE:
![Page 58: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
P58
IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE THREE:
• LESSON PLAN REVIEW: Collecting & checking teachers’ lesson plans each week, with dialogue sheet for teacher-to-principal conversation
• UNIT PLAN CREATION: Supervising teachers & teams to submit common curriculum unit plans in advance
• INTERIM ASSESSMENT LAUNCH: Managing teachers & teams to use interim assessments to plan whole-group and individual instruction
![Page 59: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Applications:Best Use of 1 hr/wk with Teachers
![Page 60: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
P60
PRE-WORK:• INTERIM ASSESSMENT & LESSON PLAN REVIEW: Checking
teachers’ lesson plans alongside key re-teach standards (action plan) or standards on next assessment identifying:• What are the key moments to observe to check for rigor
or alignment?• Are the standards well embedded in an engaging lesson?
• MINI-OBSERVATIONS: Mini-observations of class each day (5-15 minutes per visit) with brief feedback in hallways
IF YOU HAVE 1 HR/WK OF FACE TIME: PRE-WORK
![Page 61: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
P61
INDIVIDUAL FACE TIME—1st PRIORITY:• DATA-DRIVEN PROCESS IS FIRST DRIVER OF AGENDA:
• Help teacher analyze interim assessment data & make action plan (2-6 days after asst; important first time through)
• Results analysis meeting (once teacher has done analysis/action plan before meeting with you)
• Review upcoming assessment (6 weeks before)• Anticipate student performance by marking interim
assessment questions “confident,” “not sure,” “no way” (1-2 weeks before asst)
DURING REMAINING TIME/WEEKS:• FEEDBACK ON CLASSES OBSERVED: Dialogue—affirmation of
strengths, suggestions for improvement• 1-2 goals maximum• Make concrete follow-up plan if needed
• PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE: Review action plan/lesson plans, anticipate/plan key moments for upcoming week
IF YOU HAVE 1 HR/WK OF FACE TIME: INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS
![Page 62: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
P62
TEAM MEETINGS:• RESULTS MEETING PROTOCOL:
• Target just 1 standard to visit for the meeting• If important, redo results meeting around same standard
the following week to evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation
• REVIEW STUDENT WRITING:• Make action plan (2-6 days after asst)• Review upcoming assessment (6 weeks before)• Anticipate student performance by marking interim
assesment questions “confident,” “not sure,” “no way” (1-2 weeks before asst)
• MAKE ACTION PLANS: Mini-observations of class each day (5-15 minutes per visit) with brief feedback in hallways
IF YOU HAVE 1 HR/WK OF FACE TIME:TEAM MEETINGS
![Page 63: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Action with Accountability: Concrete Strategies for the Classroom
Uncommon Guide: Adding Rigor Throughout the Lesson
![Page 64: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Putting It into Action:3rd Grade Guided Reading Block
A Video Case Study
![Page 65: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
P65
• CLASS SCHEDULE: Take 10-15 minutes from math block every day to re-teach; find places in the schedule where you could gain learning time for students; utilize lunch/breakfast time
• SCHOOL SCHEDULE: Build in pre-school/after-school tutoring, use lunch/breakfast time to target students in need of improvement
• PULLOUT GROUPS: Other staff members (including you!) pull out small groups of students to work on toughest standards (highest or lowest achieving subgroups) so main teacher can focus on smaller class
SCHOOLWIDE SUPPORT
![Page 66: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
P66
• ADDITIONAL STAFF: Solicit support of non-core academic staff to teach small groups of students (paraprofessionals, art/PE teachers, SPED, ELL, tutors, parents, etc.)
• EVERY LEADER ON BOARD: All leaders (deans, VPs, dept. chairs, coaches) support the process—target teachers who need most help, follow results meeting protocol, etc.
• PULL: Rotate students into groups with similar skill deficiencies and teach them in those groups for select time periods; rotate groups when in new subjects
SCHOOLWIDE SUPPORT (con’t.)
![Page 67: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Final Steps:Building Your Own Action Plan
Plan Implementation in Your School
![Page 68: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
P68
• ID MOST IMPORTANT ACTIONS TO TAKE FROM THIS WORKSHOP
• Address Challenges• Prepare more effective analysis meetings• Link teacher face-time with data-driven student
achievement• Etc.
• PUT IT ON THE CALENDAR:• Use your implementation calendar and adjust as
radically as you need to get it done!
• LEADERSHIP APPROVAL: • Who are the key players you need around the table to
make this happen? • What is the most effective persuasion/conversation?• If they say no, how can you creatively comply and still
implement your project?
MAKING YOUR OWN ACTION PLAN:
![Page 69: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Conclusions
Data-Driven Instruction & Assessment
Paul Bambrick-Santoyo
![Page 70: Data-Driven Instruction Mid-Year Follow-up Workshop](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051402/56815d48550346895dcb5013/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
P70
E.L. HAYNES PUBLIC SCHOOL, WASHINGTON, DC
Jennie Niles, Eric Westendorf & Michelle Molitor,Cohorts 2,6 & 7
DCCAS RESULTS Language Arts Mathematics
Year Tested% Proficient / Adv
Proficient% Proficient / Adv
Proficient
2005-06 40% 28%2006-07 43% 48%2007-08 60% 67%2-year gains: +20 +39
WASHINGTON, DC IN ACTION:
Winner, $100,000, Top Public School in DC