CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

download CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

of 13

Transcript of CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    1/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    1

    Recommendation: Long CVEO

    Price: $2.05 ($220M impl. market cap, 32% 15’ UFCF Yield, 0.4x TBV and 4.6x 15’ EBITDA of

    $137M)

    Price Target: $4.65 (12% ’16 Unlev. FCF Yield, 8.7x 2016E Consensus EBITDA of $100M)

    Upside/Downside: ~5:1 (+130% Upside/ 25% Downside) 

    Recommended Portfolio Allocation: 5%

    Investment Thesis 

    •  Civeo Corporation (NYSE:CVEO), which spun-off from Oil States International (OIS) mid last year under pressure

    from JANA Partners, is an underfollowed workforce accommodation provider for oil and mining workers in remot

    areas in the Canadian oil sands, Australia and the US. Its facilities (lodges/mobile open camps) are located in close

    proximity to the lowest cost producers of oil and met coal. At its peak as the Accommodations Division of OIS, th

    business generated $500M in EBITDA (in FY2012) and grew its topline every single year until then.

    •  The stock has gotten pummeled over the past year (off 82% its 52 week high of $10.94) and appears to trade

    deceivingly similarly to an entity destined for bankruptcy, due to (i) the dramatic drop in commodity prices (both

    oil and coal) as well as CAD/AUS currency headwinds; (ii) the decision to pursue a redomicile transaction in Canadin favor of a REIT conversion which was looked down upon by the street, and more recently, (iii) overblown

    concerns around its level of liquidity (fueled by inaccurate assumptions put forward by a misinformed short seller

    •  CVEO’s management team has done an excellent job given the circumstances to proactively address these issues

    head on and weather the downturn: they have (i) successfully completed CVEO’s redomestication to take

    advantage of lower tax rates and more efficiently utilize future cash flow, (ii) paid off 46% of the company debt

    with cash on hand and amended the credit facility and leverage covenants which alleviates near-term liquidity

    related concerns, (iii) secured multiple new contracts (contributions from which will show up in 2016 financials),

    (iv) reduced headcount 40+% since Sep 2014 (with 35% overhead reduction in Canada this year and over 20%

    redn. in Australia over the past couple years), (v) significantly reduced maintenance capex, and above all, (iv)

    communicated transparently with investors on the state of affairs, issuing conservative, achievable guidance (theQ3 results came in at the top end of guidance and Q2 EBITDA results blew past guidance by 31%) and there’s good

    reason to believe they will comfortably hit their FY2015 numbers ($530-545M in Rev and $131-143M in EBITDA)

    given 90% of their 4Q15 Lodge Rev (over 75% of the business) is already contracted.

    •  Although I expect some near-term volatility, I believe CVEO can trade up around 130% above today’s levels to

    $4.65 / share over the next 12-18 months, as the debt paydown, headcount reductions, lower taxes from the

    redomestication and new contracts secured begin to reflect in the financials (as early as Q1 16) and the stock

    reappears on institutional investor radars. Some recent notable activity:

    o  Since Sep 2015, the CEO and CFO have purchased collectively $500K of the stock.

    o  Fidelity’s small cap fund established an opportunistic position (Aug 10) and added to its position in Q3

    (13% owned). It remains the largest institutional investor (ahead of Sterling Capital at around 5%).Centerbridge Partners took a 3% position in Q3 2015 as well. Despite general investor fatigue from having

    gotten burned last year, I expect other small-cap focused value funds to follow suit.

    o  The sell-side has noticed – Sterne Agee upgraded the stock w/ a $4.00 PT on Sep 2 and Scotia Howard

    followed with a $5.00 PT in a note published Sep 15.

    •  At a 32% 2015 Unlevered FCF Yield, CVEO still represents one of the more attractive value plays out there on th

    eventual recovery of the oil and gas/met coal markets. FY15 earnings will be a key catalyst to this story.

    CVEO Capitalizatio n($M, except as noted)Share Price, as of 11/18/15  $2FDSO   107.4Equity Value  $220Debt Outstanding  $416Cash Outstanding  $12Noncontrolling Int  $0Enterprise Value  $624

    Impl '15 Unlev FCF*  $7Impl. FCF Yield 32

    9/30 LTM EBITDA  $196

    EV/LTM EBITDA 3.

    2015 Mgmt EBITDA  $136EV/15' Mgmt EBITDA 4.

    *EBITDA less Total Capex

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    2/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    2

    Business Model

    •  As mentioned above, CVEO provides permanent (Lodges) and temporary (Mobile and Open Camps) workforce

    accommodations for oil and mining workers in remote areas of Canada, Australia and the US. The company also

    provides associated catering, facilities management, and logistics services, basically functioning as a full-service

    hotel for these workers (see pictures in Appendix).•  CVEO has 13,400 rooms (ex camps) in Canada (63% of LTM EBITDA), 40+% market share among 3rd party provider

    and 20% overall including operator owned), over 9,000 rooms in Australia (35% of LTM EBITDA,34% market share

    overall) and over 900 rooms in the US (2% of EBITDA). On an LTM basis as of 3Q15, the business generated $640M

    in Revenue and $197M in EBITDA (31% margin) and for 2015, CVEO is well on track to generate between $530-

    545M in Revenue and $131-143M in EBITDA (~26% margin).

    •  CVEO’s facilities broadly fall into one of two categories: Villages/Lodges (77% of LTM Revenue) and Mobile/Open

    Camps (23% of LTM Revenue). Villages and lodges are typically permanent styled structures with multi-year take-

    or-pay contracts (typically 1-3 yrs) which help mitigate short-term commodity price exposure on new capital

    (majority of CVEO’s contracts have termination provisions but customers incur a material termination fee).

    CVEO’s lodge facilities are large high quality properties (they’re not dinky Howard Johnsons) where guestsreceive the amenity level of a full- service hotel plus three meals a day. And to get an order of magnitude

    of these facilities, CVEO’s Wapasu Creek Lodge is the second largest lodging property in N. America

    (behind a Vegas hotel, likely MGM). CVEO currently operates 7 lodges and 6 open camps in Canada, 9

    villages (no open camps) in Australia and 4 open camps in the US.

    o  Mobile/open camps are smaller, more temporary facilities that can be quickly deployed on short-term

    contracts (typically 16-18 months), usually to support transient drilling, pipeline, seismic work.

    •  CVEO’s largest customers include large, investment grade blue chip energy and mining names like Exxon

    controlled Imperial Oil (10+% of its revenue), Fluor Canada and BM Alliance Coal Operations (an alliance between

    BHP Billiton and Mitsubishi) –well-capitalized industry behemoths who are making multi- billion dollar investment

    to develop their prospects which generally have estimated reserve lives of 10 – 30+ yrs; these investments are

    therefore dependent on those customers’ longer- term view of commodity demand and prices. Existing projects

    have costs closer to C$30/bbl to operate and cover overhead. I believe CVEO's clients, mostly big names, will

    actually benefit longer term as small, leveraged players go out of business. For e.g., SunCor just announced a

    capex expansion in the region and a commitment to the oil sands, which will bode well for CVEO.

    •  Demand for CVEO’s accommodations services generally originates from their customers’ projects, most

    significantly during the development or construction phase and, to a lesser extent, the operations and production

    phase. Demand for the company’s customers’ services is primarily driven by these customers’ capital spending

    programs related to the construction and development of oil sands projects, mines and other resource

    developments including associated resource delineation and infrastructure.

    Demand in Canada will be driven by increased investment in the Canadian oil sands. Acc. to a  WSJ article,

    existing oil sands surface mines can make money at about $30 a barrel, and the most efficient

    underground oil sands projects can stay in the black at $35 a barrel. That is still above the break-even

    levels of many traditional oil wells, but below those of other unconventional sources of crude, including

    most production from the Bakken Shale formation in North Dakota. Given the number of variables

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/as-oil-slips-below-50-canada-digs-in-for-long-haul-1421114641http://www.wsj.com/articles/as-oil-slips-below-50-canada-digs-in-for-long-haul-1421114641http://www.wsj.com/articles/as-oil-slips-below-50-canada-digs-in-for-long-haul-1421114641http://www.wsj.com/articles/as-oil-slips-below-50-canada-digs-in-for-long-haul-1421114641

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    3/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    3

    influencing oil prices, it is difficult to time the recovery but per a WSJ article (published 8/31), it appears

    things will get better before they get worse as oil prices are already up 29% from their 8/24 low.

    o  Demand in Australia will be driven primarily by the outlook for met coal, whose pricing and growth in

    production is influenced by levels of global steel production. Growth in worldwide steel demand

    decreased from 3.8% in 2013 to 2% in 2014 on the back of a construction slowdown in China which is

    beginning to change course as monthly home prices begin to climb back up (see here, and here). Met coa

    prices have slumped to their lowest level in the last 3 yrs (see Appendix) to below $100/t but the Bowen

    basin and Australia in general represents one of the lowest cost coal producers in the world.

    •  CVEO has had a number of recent wins demonstrating success at winning contracts despite commodity price

    weakness and has a robust pipeline of opportunities it is pursuing. The company was recently awarded a contract

    from LNG Canada (led by Shell Canada) to support development of Sitka Lodge (436 rooms, 4Q15) which could

    expand to a ~2K room relationship (mgmt. alluded to this target on their Q2 call and latest Aug 25 investor

    presentation). Other recent contract extensions announced totaling US$120M+ include:

    Two contract awards for Moranbah Village totaling 260 room and $32 million over five years

    o  C$22 million contract to support redevelopment of Mariana Lake into a 526-room open lodge.

    C$31 million extension at Wapasu Creek for an average of 500 rooms through the end of 2017

    o  C$64 million of contract awards and extensions in Athabasca, comprised of accommodations, operations

    and manufacturing mandates.

    Liquidity

    •  Understanding liquidity is absolutely critical to this investment thesis as this has been the biggest concern. CVEO

    formally amended its credit facility on Jul 17, 2015, which in addition to permitting the redomiciling to Canada,

    provided additional lending capacity in Canada, reduced both the existing U.S. term loan and U.S. revolver and

    increased the maximum leverage ratio allowed under the credit facility.

    •  As of Sep 30, 2015, subsequent to the completion of the redomestication, CVEO’s total debt balance stood at

    roughly $416 million (46% below 12/31 debt of $775M), with cash on hand of $12.6 million. This amounts to Tota

    Debt/LTM EBITDA of 2.1x vs a Sep 2015 covenant of 3.5x which steps up to 4x in Q4 2015, 4.25x in Q1 2016 and

    to 4.5x for the remainder of 2016.

    Assuming the company hits its projected guidance of $20-25M in EBITDA for Dec 2015 and there are no

    further debt paydowns, the leverage ratio would stand at 3.0x as of Dec 31, 2015 (off ~$137M in LTM

    EBITDA) vs a 4x leverage covenant which is manageable.

    o  Looking out to 2016, Consensus LTM EBITDA is ~$108M for Q1 2016 and $92M for Q2 2016. The covenan

    for Q1 2016 stands at 4.25x and 4.5x for Q2. This implies the company needs to have at most ~$460M in

    Debt in Q1 2016, and $415M in Q2 2016. It has about $13M in cash on hand right now and will generate in

    excess of $50M in FCF over the next 3 quarters (based on my calculations). The debt balance is already

    lower implying it should comfortably clear covenants up to Q2 2016, and for that matter all of 2016.

    o  FY 2015 earnings will be critical to this thesis to better understand 2016 contract value/guidance. In

    general, over the next 12-18 months, I expect the situation to get better as debt paydowns continue and I

    take comfort in that fact that management made it explicitly clear on their Q3 call (as well as investor

    presentation in Sep 2015) that this was a top priority before any other value enhancing initiatives were

    undertaken.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-prices-rally-amid-lower-u-s-output-estimates-opec-article-1441037584http://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-prices-rally-amid-lower-u-s-output-estimates-opec-article-1441037584http://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-prices-rally-amid-lower-u-s-output-estimates-opec-article-1441037584http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/17/china-new-july-home-prices-rise-03-mm-37-yy.htmlhttp://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/17/china-new-july-home-prices-rise-03-mm-37-yy.htmlhttp://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/17/china-new-july-home-prices-rise-03-mm-37-yy.htmlhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/blackstone-hunts-for-commercial-property-opportunities-in-china-1440582497http://www.wsj.com/articles/blackstone-hunts-for-commercial-property-opportunities-in-china-1440582497http://www.wsj.com/articles/blackstone-hunts-for-commercial-property-opportunities-in-china-1440582497http://www.crugroup.com/14716/15427/97980/AP-Chart1-june.jpghttp://www.crugroup.com/14716/15427/97980/AP-Chart1-june.jpghttp://www.crugroup.com/14716/15427/97980/AP-Chart1-june.jpghttp://www.crugroup.com/14716/15427/97980/AP-Chart1-june.jpghttp://www.wsj.com/articles/blackstone-hunts-for-commercial-property-opportunities-in-china-1440582497http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/17/china-new-july-home-prices-rise-03-mm-37-yy.htmlhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-prices-rally-amid-lower-u-s-output-estimates-opec-article-1441037584

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    4/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    4

    Valuation 

    •  CVEO is one of the few accommodations providers that service the entire value chain from site identification to

    long- term facility management and there are no real US listed comps. The company’s closest Canadian listed

    comps are Black Diamond (BDI) and Horizon North (HNL), both of which are much smaller businesses which have

    traded in the 7-9x EBITDA multiple range over the past 5 yrs

    o  BDl trades closer to the 9x multiple and is the more relevant comp as a pure play vs HNL which derives

    85% of its business from camps (which I argue should be valued at a lower multiple given the shorter-term

    nature of the contract and lower margin (23%) vs CVEO’s lodges (traditionally 30+%)) and 15% comes froma matting business which is essentially a solid surface over unstable ground conditions to facilitate heavy

    equipment movement). 

    o  CVEO has a greater share of the market vs both of these players and these competitors do not have the

    breadth or scale of their lodge operations and should command a premium.

    •  Assuming 2016 FCF of $60M (off consensus trough EBITDA of $100M and $40M of stated maintenance capex) at a

    12% FCF Yield (significantly below where it trades today), I arrive at a $4.65 target. Assuming the business pays

    down an additional $30M in debt and no changes in cash/NCI, this equates to a ~$870M EV (8.7x ’16 EBITDA).

    •  My downside price, $1.52, is derived from an illustrative liquidation value analysis (see Appendix) where I’ve take

    significant (50+% haircuts for the majority of line items) to all assets, with liabilities being paid out at face value.

    Risks

    •  CVEO is highly correlated to the strength of the oil/gas/met coal markets and as the past twelve months have

    shown, any bulls dismissing/underestimating commodities exposure have been proven dead wrong. This thesis is

    predicated on the debt paydown and management navigating the downturn successfully, not on growth opps.

    •  Inability of mgmt. to renew additional contracts / customers shift workers to customer operated rooms.

    •  FX translation risk involving AUD and CAD which to an extent has been mitigated by redomiciling to Canada.

    CVEO Debt Profile

    ($ in MM) Dec-14 Mar-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Sep-15Cash $263.3 $279.8 $315.2 $50.5 $12.6

    Current Debt* $19.4 $29.1 $38.8 $18.8 $18.2US Term Loan $755.6 $745.9 $736.3 $47.5 $50.0Canadian Term Loan** $308.8 $295.9Revolving Credit Facility $125.0 $52.0

    Debt With Oil StatesTotal Debt $775.0 $775.0 $775.1 $500.1 $416.1

    % Change 0% 0% (35%) (46%)(since Q2)

    Net Debt $511.7 $495.2 $459.9 $449.6 $403.4% Change (3%) (7%) (2%) (12%)

    (since Q2)

    Total Stockholders' Equity $860.1 $750.8 $755.3 $755.3 $569.6

    Total Capitalization $1,635.1 $1,525.8 $1,530.4 $1,255.4 $985.7

    Total Debt/Capitalization 47% 51% 51% 40% 42%

    Total Debt/LTM Adj EBITDA 1.8x 1.5x 2.6x 1.9x 2.1xNet Debt/LTM Adj EBITDA 1.2x 1.0x 1.5x 1.7x 2.1x

    *PF current debt includes current portions of botht the US and Canadian Term Loans

    **Assumes current portion of debt outstanding for 3Q15 is on Canadian Term Loan

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    5/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    5

    Disclaimer:

    The above text is the view of the author alone and is for informational and educational purposes only. It should not be

    construed as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell securities. The author may hold a position in the securities

    mentioned, and does not have to provide updates for changes to his view. The author does not warrant his work for

    correctness or accuracy. Perform your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

    I do not hold a position of employment, directorship, or consultancy with the issuer.

    I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities. 

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    6/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    6

    Appendices

    Stock Price Performance (Since CVEO began trading in late May 2014)

    CVEO Market Share (Per Mgmt. Estimates – CVEO Investor Pres- note this is as of Sep 15)

    Sep ‘14: CVEO board

    announces decision

    to redomicile vs

    converting to a REIT

    Dec ‘14: CVEO

    issues weak 2015

    guidance given

    market weakness

    Jun/Jul ‘15:

    Successfully

    amends facility

    and completesredomestication

    Sep/Oct ‘15:

    CEO/CFO buy

    ~$500k of stock

    Analysts

    upgrade CVEO

    w/ $4-5 PT

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    7/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    7

    Liquidation Value Analysis

    CVEO Balance Sheet Recovery / Liquidation Value Analysis

    Impact of Accomodations Assets Recovery % on L iq Value Estimate

    30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55%1.52$ 0.14$ 0.83$ 1.52$ 2.21$ 2.90$ 3.59$

    $ in MM Estim Liquidation

    12/31/14 09/30/15 Recovery Value

     AssetsCash and cash equivalents  $263.3 $12.6 100%  $12.6

     Accounts receivable, net   160.3 63.7 25%   15.9Inventories   13.2 5.6 25%   1.4Prepaid expenses   20.7 20.4 25%   5.1Other current assets   6.5 7.2 25%   1.8

     Assets held for sale   0 8.9 50%   4.5Total current assets  $464.0 $118.5 $41.3

    Estimated Useful

    Property, plant and equipment, net: Life (in years)Land  $55.4 $48.2 40%  $19.3

     Accommodat ions assets 3-15   1,687.0 1,485.5 40%

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    8/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    8

     Additional Liquidity Related Data

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    9/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    9

    CVEO Summary P&L

    CVEO Summary P&L / Operating Stats

    Historical Mgmt Consensus2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD15 2015 2016

    Revenue

    Lodge/Village RevenueCanada 413 550 549 497 214 Australia 196 274 256 213 109Total Lodge/Village Revenue 609 824 805 710 323

    % of Total 70% 74% 77% 75% 77%

    Mobile & Open CampCanada 167 167 162 164 65 Australia 1 3 0 0 0US 88 116 75 68 33Total Mobile/Open Camp Revenue 256 286 237 232 97

    % of Total 30% 26% 23% 25% 23%

    Total Canada Revenue $580 $717 $711 $661 $278 $365Total Australia Revenue $197 $277 $256 $213 $109 $135Total US Revenue $88 $116 $75 $68 $33 $38Total Revenue $865 $1,110 $1,042 $942 $421 $538 $481

    % Growth 28% -6% -10% -43% -11%

    Canada % Growth 24% -1% -7% -45% Australia % Growth 41% -8% -17% -37%US % Growth 32% -35% -9% -45%

    EBITDACanada $217 $298 $279 $236 $82 $96 Australia $107 $156 $142 $109 $52 $62US $32 $47 $13 $13 $1 $3Corp/Other ($3) ($7) ($8) ($18) ($16) ($24) Adjus ted EBITDA $353 $494 $425 $340 $119 $137 $100

    % Margin 45% 41% 36% 28% 25% 21%

    Canada % Margin 37% 42% 39% 36% 29% 26% Australia % Margin 54% 56% 55% 51% 48% 46%US % Margin 36% 41% 17% 19% 3% 8%

     Avg. Available Lodge/Village RoomsCanada 8,985  10,660  11,541  12,557  13,433  Australia 6,012  7,761  8,925  9,271  9,064 Total Lodge/Village Rooms 14,997  18,421  20,466  21,828  22,497 

    RevPARCanada $126 $141 $130 $108 $87 Australia $89 $97 $79 $63 $66Total RevPAR $111 $123 $108 $89 $79

    Occupancy in Lodges/VillagesCanada 81% 93% 92% 85% 63% High 40s/ Australia 96% 93% 83% 68% 58% Low 50sTotal Occupancy 88% 93% 87% 78% 61% Guidance

     Avg Exchange RateCAD/US 1.0117 1.0006 0.971 0.906 0.795 AUD/US 1.0324 1.0359 0.965 0.902 0.763

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    10/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    10

    CVEO Facilities Overview

    Canada

    Extraction Room Count

    Lodges Region Technique 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15*

    Wapasu N. Athabasca mining 4,013  5,174  5,174  5,174  5,174  5,174 

    Henday(1)

    N. Athabasca mining/in situ -  120  1,698  1,698  1,698  1,698 

    McClelland Lake Lodge N. Athabasca mining 1,888  1,997  Athabasca

    (1)N. Athabasca mining 1,537  1,776  1,877  1,557  2,005  2,005 

    Beaver River N. Athabasca mining 732  732  876  1,094  1,094  1,094 

    Pebble Beach Lodge Sitka 432 

    Conklin S. Athabasca mining/in situ 608  584  948  1,036  700  700 

     Anzac S. Athabasca in situ 526  526  526 

    Lakeside(2)

    N. Athabasca mining 510  510  510  510 

    Total Rooms 7,400  8,896  11,083  11,595  13,085  13,626 

    Open Camps Province 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15*

    Mariana Lake Alberta 247  478  478  486  435  435 

    Boundary Saskatchewan 346  346  346 

    Waskada Manitoba 196  196 

     Antler River Manitoba 212  212 

    Red Earth Alberta 92  114  114  114 

    Redvers Saskatchewan 102  102  102  102 

    Geetla British Columbia 135  81  81  81 

    Christina Lake Alberta 10  65  35  35 

    Total Rooms 247  478  1,013  1,390  1,325  1,325 

     Aus tralia

    Resource

    Villages Basin Commodity 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15*

    Coppabella Bowen met coal 1,654  2,556  2,912  3,048  3,048  3,048 

    Dysart Bowen met coal 1,249  1,491  1,912  1,912  1,798  1,798 

    Moranbah Bowen met coal 889  1,180  1,240  1,240  1,240  1,240 

    Middlemount Bowen met coal 690  816  816  816  816  816 

    Boggabri Gunnedah met/thermal coal 508  662  662 

    Narrabri Gunnedah met/thermal coal 242  502  502  502  502 

    Nebo Bowen met coal 490  490  490  490  490  490 

    Calliope — LNG 300  300  300  300  300 

    Kambalda(3)

     — Gold 238  238  238  238  232 

    Karratha Pilbara LNG, iron ore 208  208  208  208 

    Total Rooms 5,210  7,313  8,618  9,262  9,296  9,064 

    United States

    US Open Camp Rooms State 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 3Q15*

    West Permian TX 166  310  310 

    Three Rivers TX 106  274  274  274 

    Killdeer ND 126  235  235 

    Stanley House ND 199  199  157  157 

    Total Open Camp Rooms 305  765  976  976 

    Source:CVEO Investor Presentation (Aug 25, 2015)

    *Data as of 3Q15 not available currently. Best guess estimates. The room count is likely off by a few rooms (and would be revised downwards 100-200 rooms)

    (1) Temporarily closed due to lower expected activity in the region.

    (2) Permanently closed in Q4 2014.

    (3) Permanently closed in Q2 2015.

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    11/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    11

    Industry Stats (Per latest CVEO Investor Pres)

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    12/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    12

  • 8/20/2019 CVEO Investment Thesis - 11.18 Update

    13/13

    Sid Arora November 18, 201

    CVEO Long Thesis

    13

    Facility Pictures (Per CVEO website)