Customer Satisfaction Research Project
-
Upload
juhi-srivastava -
Category
Education
-
view
53 -
download
6
Transcript of Customer Satisfaction Research Project
Customer Satisfaction Research Project
VS
OBJECTIVES• Assess customer satisfaction of two Mexican food joints : Chipotle
and Qdoba
• Collect primary data through questionnaire, analyze data, and generate findings
• Provide recommendations and suggestions for Chipotle and qdoba
3
Company backgroundChipotle Vs Qdoba
Founded 1993 1995
# of Owned Restaurants 2010 641
Franchised Restaurants ZERO Around 320
Sales in 2013/2014/2015 $3.2B/$4.1B/$4.5B $293.2M/$338.4M/$374.3M
Menu Burritos, Tacos, Salads and Bowls, Chips and Salsa
Burritos, Tacos, Salads and Bowls, Chips and dip, Soup
Timings 11AM-10PM 11AM-9PM(8PM on Saturday and Sunday)
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chipotle_Mexican_Grillhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qdoba_Mexican_Eats
4
METHODOLOGY• Questionnaire design and pretest
• Design finalization and data collection
• Creation of dataset
• Descriptive and comparative analysis (Paired sample T test), Quadrant charts / Importance-performance charts
• Performance analysis
• Regression analysis
• Results and recommendation
5
QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN• The main objective of this survey is to assess the customer satisfaction
with Chipotle and Qdoba
• The questionnaire was to be handed out manually to the respondents for data collection
• Comprised of multiple choice and rating questions on a scale of 1-5
• Simple and straight forward terminology
• Screener question to eliminate “invalid” responses
• Survey was handed out to a few respondents as a pretest
• Using the feedback from the pretest, finalized the survey design
6
SAMPLING PLAN• Who should participate in the research?
• How many people should participate in the research?
• Which sampling method to be used?
• We used one of the non-probability sampling methods- convenience sample
• Convenience sample is made up of people who are easy to reach
7
SAMPLING PLAN• 38,000 total Mexican restaurants in the U.S.A
• New York Tri-State region has the highest number of Mexican food restaurants, of which, Chipotle and Qdoba cover 69%.
• Customers of age 18-34 yrs represent around 50% of this consumption.
• Our focus was towards this demographic of students and young professionals.
• Approximately, 20 responses per team member
Source: abcnews.go.com
8
SURVEY ADMINISTRATION• For our research, we used the Paper-and-Pencil Survey method for
the survey administration
• The researcher was present during the administration.
• It is a cost-effective way of collecting data. (No computer/internet access required)
• The researcher’s presence acted as a motivating factor for the respondents to complete the survey and answer their questions, if any
• This quick response loop assured a higher response rate
• We surpassed our aim for the 80 responses and were able to collect 85 valid responses.
9
OVERALL DISTRIBUTION OF DATA
10
COMPARISON- OVERALL SATISFACTION RATING
05/01/23
There is a statistically significant difference between the Overall satisfaction rating of Chipotle
and Qdoba
11
ATTRIBUTE COMPARISON
Attributes Chipotle QdobaSig.(2-tailed)
*indicates statistically significant
at 95%
Convenience of Location 3.82 3.15 0.000*
Hours of Operation 4.54 3.57 0.049*Price 3.75 3.49 0.042*Cleanliness 3.94 3.61 0.010*Customer Service 3.84 3.53 0.003*Time to Serve 4.07 3.64 0.000*Freshness of food 4.10 3.54 0.000*Taste 4.02 3.57 0.004*Availability of choices 3.70 3.50 0.123
Portion size 4.12 3.64 0.000* 12
CHIPOTLE PERFORMANCE ANALYSISAttributes Mean Correlation
Location 3.82 0.33
Price 3.75 0.41
Cleanliness 3.94 0.58
Customer service 3.84 0.42
Time to serve 4.07 0.42
Freshness of food 4.1 0.56
Taste 4.04 0.57
Availability of Choices 3.7 0.44
Portion Size 4.12 0.38
13
QDOBA PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
05/01/23 14
Attributes Mean Correlation
Location 3.15 0.482
Hours of Operation 3.57 0.431
Price 3.49 0.341
Cleanliness 3.61 0.494
Customer service 3.52 0.406
Time to serve 3.64 0.557
Freshness of food 3.54 0.513
Taste 3.57 0.479
Availability of Choices 3.5 0.39
Portion Size 3.64 0.418
14
JOINT PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
05/01/23 15
Attributes Mean Correlation
Location 3.49 0.46
Hours of Operation 4.05 0.16
Price 3.62 0.39
Cleanliness 3.77 0.55
Customer service 3.68 0.43
Time to serve 3.86 0.52
Freshness of food 3.81 0.56
Taste 3.80 0.55
Availability of Choices 3.60 0.42
Portion Size 3.88 0.44
15
REGRESSION MODEL - CHIPOTLE
05/01/23 16
Stepwise regression
Regression results
(Chipotle)Alpha = 0.05
F(10,71) = 9.987,
p<0.001, R-Squared =
0.58***Model is significant
TasteFreshness of
foodMenu choices explain 58%
of variance in Chipotle
mean rating
16
Overall Satisfaction(Chipotle) = 0.505 + (0.337 * Taste + 0.308 * Freshness of food + 0.222 * Availability of choices)
REGRESSION MODEL - QDOBA
Stepwise regression
***Model is significantTime to Serve
Freshness of food
Convenience of location
explain around 48% variance in mean rating of
Qdoba
17
Overall Satisfaction(Qdoba) = 0.972 + (0.283 * Freshness of food + 0.276 * Time to serve + 0.193 * Convenience of location)
REGRESSION ANALYSIS – COMBINED DATA
Stepwise regression
Overall Satisfaction = 0.555 + (0.264 * Freshness of food + 0.210 * Taste + 0.239 * Time to serve + 0.134 * Availability of Choices)
KEY DRIVER ANALYSIS BY GENDER
19
MEAN/CORRELATION MATRIX BY GENDER
Attributes Mean CorrelationLocation 3.43 0.501*
Hours of Operation 3.76 0.504*
Price 3.53 0.431*
Cleanliness 3.66 0.527*
Customer service 3.6 0.379*
Time to serve 3.83 0.586*
Food freshness 3.79 0.487*
Taste 3.76 0.462*
Choice 3.51 0.386*
Portion 3.85 0.506*
MALE
Attributes Mean CorrelationLocation 3.6 0.373*
Hours of Operation 4.58 0.112
Price 3.78 0.306*
Cleanliness 3.98 0.592*
Customer service 3.83 0.518*
Time to serve 3.9 0.407*
Food freshness 3.87 0.699*
Taste 3.88 0.699*
Choice 3.77 0.503*
Portion 3.93 0.290*
FEMALE
* Indicates statistically significant
20
ATTRIBUTE COMPARISONS BY GENDERAttributes Male Female
Convenience of Location 3.43 3.6
Hours of Operation 3.76 4.58
Price 3.53 3.78
Cleanliness 3.66 3.98**
Customer Service 3.6 3.83
Time to Serve 3.83 3.9
Freshness of food 3.79 3.87
Taste 3.76 3.88
Availability of choices 3.51 3.77
Portion size 3.85 3.93
* Indicates statistically significant differences
21
Non-GMO & E-coli Scare
There is no evidence to suggest that respondents
care about Non-GMO ingredients and E-coli scare
22
RECOMMENDATIONS - CHIPOTLE
• More competitive pricing
• Increase menu choices like Soups and Queso dip
• Increase cleanliness
• Increase awareness of Non-GMO ingredients
• Efforts to eliminate incidents similar to E-coli scare
23
RECOMMENDATIONS - QDOBA
• Increase the number of franchises
• Increase freshness of ingredients by sourcing from local farms
• Provide options to customize food according to customer’s taste
• Improve services to provide better experience for customers
24