CUSP for VAP: EVAP Where are we g oing and How w ill w e get there?
description
Transcript of CUSP for VAP: EVAP Where are we g oing and How w ill w e get there?
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011
CUSP for VAP: EVAPWhere are we going and How will we get there?
Sean Berenholtz M.D., MHS
3Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
4
Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI): A Preventable Epidemic
• Focus on 4 HAIs: – VAP, CLABSI, surgical site infections and
catheter associated urinary tract infections• $5 billion per year excess costs• 1.7 million patients per year
– 1 out of 20 patients• 98,000 deaths per year
– As many deaths as breast cancer and HIV/AIDS– 6th leading cause of preventable deaths
Waxman HA. Hearing of April 16, 2008
Impact of VAP
• 10-20% of ventilated patients• Common HAI
– Median rate 1-4.3 per 1000 vent day– 250,000 infections per year
• Most lethal HAI– Mortality likely exceeds 10%– Up to 36,000 deaths per year
• Cost per episode: $23,000Safdar CCM 2005, Kollef Chest 2005,Perencevich ICHE 2007, Klevens Public Health Rep. 2007.
Project Overview
• NIH/NHLBI and AHRQ funding project– Individual hospitals participate for 3 years,
including 2 year intervention period and 1 year evaluation of sustainability
• Leveraging leaders in field – Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and
Quality, NIH/NHLBI, CDC, AHRQ, University of Pennsylvania, MHA and HAP
– MD and PA hospitals
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality6
Project Goals
• To achieve significant reductions in VAP/VAE rates
• To achieve significant improvements in safety culture
How will we get there?
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/armstrong_institute
Successful Efforts to Reduce Preventable Harm
• Michigan Keystone ICU program– Reductions in central line-associated
blood stream infections (CLABSI) 1,2
– Reductions in ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP) 3
• National On the CUSP: Stop BSI program 4
1. Pronovost P, N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725-32. 2. Pronovost P, BMJ 2010;340:c309. 3. Berenholtz S, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(4): 305-314. 4. www.onthecuspstophai.org
9
Percent of Units with Zero CLABSIs and Achieving Project Goal (<1/1000 CL days)
10
*Data drawn from Interim Project Report – Figure 5 – Cohorts 1 through 3
www.onthecuspstophai.org
Ventilator Bundle
• Semirecumbant positioning
• Appropriate SUD prophylaxis
• Appropriate DVT prophylaxis
• Appropriate sedation
• Daily assessment of readiness to extubate
Sample Daily Goals
J Crit Care 2003;18(2):71-75
Education
Decrease complexity and create redundancy
• Daily goals checklist
• Standardized ordersets and protocols
Independent redundancies
• Nursing, RT, families
Ventilator Bundle Adherence Through 36-months Post-Intervention
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(4): 305-314.
Mean Quarterly VAP Rate Through 36-Months Post-Intervention
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(4): 305-314.
Lives and Dollars Saved
• 10% mortality reduction – Michigan Medicare data compared to over
350 hospitals in surrounding states• BMJ 2011;342:d219
• $1.1 million saved per year for average hospital– 30 CLABSIs and 18 VAP cases averted
annually– Financial benefits far exceed costs of
intervention• Am J Med Qual. 2001;26:333-339 15
Lessons Learned
• Harm is preventable– Many healthcare acquired infection are
preventable; should be viewed as defect
• Focus on systems; Not individuals
• Limitations of the ‘Ventilator Bundle’
17
Ventilator Bundle
• Developed to prevent complications for patients requiring MV– Not focused specifically on VAP prevention – Not systematically updated
• VAP prevention guidelines conflicting and outdated
• Need to develop a ‘VAP prevention’ bundle– Pilot test before national dissemination
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
VAP Prevention Guidelines
• CDC Guidelines • MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004;53:1-36
• American Thoracic Society/ Infectious Diseases Society of America
• AJRCCM 2005;171(4):388-416.• Canadian VAP Prevention Guidelines
• J Crit Care 2008;23(1):138-147.• Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of
America• ICHE 2008;29:S31-S40.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Process Measures: Daily Evaluation1. Head of Bed Elevation (HOB)
– Use of a semi-recumbent position ( ≥ 30 degrees).
2. Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials (SAT & SBT)
– Make a daily assessment of readiness to wean with the use of the SAT and SBT.
3. Oral Care– At least 6 times per day
4. Oral Care with Chlorhexidine– 2 times per day
5. Subglottic Suctioning – Use CSS ETTs in patients expected
to be MV for >72 hoursArmstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality19
Policy Based Structural Measures :
1. Use a closed ETT suctioning system2. Change close suctioning catheters only as needed3. Change ventilator circuits only if damaged or soiled4. Change HME every 5-7 days and as clinically indicated5. Provide easy access to NIVV equipment and institute protocols to promote use6. Periodically remove condensate from circuits, keeping the circuit closed during
the removal, taking precautions not to allow condensate to drain toward patient7. Use early mobility protocol8. Perform hand hygiene9. Avoid supine position10. Use standard precautions while suctioning respiratory tract secretions11. Use orotracheal intubation instead of nasotracheal12. Avoid use of prophylactic systemic antimicrobials13. Avoid non-essential tracheal suctioning14. Avoid gastric over-distention
20ETT endotrachael tube; HME heat moist exchanger; NIVV non-invasive ventilation
21
Early Ambulation
• RCT, 104 MICU patients on ventilators• PT/OT starting at day 1-2 vs ‘usual care’
– Passive range of motion to ambulation• Improved return to independent functional
status at hospital discharge• Shorter duration of delirium • Increased ventilator-free days
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Lancet 2009; 373: 1874–82
22
Far More Complex than Implementing a Checklist
• Technical work– ‘Things we have a solution to’– Summarize the evidence and educate
providers
• Adaptive work– Addressing values, attitudes and beliefs
that drive actions– Teamwork and safety culture is important and
can be improved
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011
L&D RN/MD ICU RN/MD OR RN/Surg CRNA/Anesth
25
26
Teamwork and Safety Culture
• Linked to important clinical and operational outcomes
• Predicts successful efforts to implement safety programs
• Responsive to interventions like CUSP
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
27
"Needs Improvement” Statewide Michigan CUSP ICU Results
• “Needs Improvement”: Less than 60% of respondents reporting good safety or teamwork climate
• Statewide in 2004 82-84% needed improvement, in 2007 22-23%
J Critical Care 2008;23:207-221
Crit Care Med 2011;39(5):1-6
Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
1. Educate staff on science of safety
2. Identify defects
3. Assign executive to adopt unit
4. Learn from one defect per quarter
5. Implement teamwork tools Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
2010;36:252-60 Resources: www.safercare.net
Sample Daily Goals
J Crit Care 2003;18(2):71-75
Education
Decrease complexity and create redundancy
• Daily goals checklist
• Standardized ordersets and protocols
Independent redundancies
• Nursing, RT, families
Best Way Forward
• Informed by science
• Led by clinicians and supported by management
• Guided by measures
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality30
Advancing the Science
• Development of a ‘VAP Prevention’ bundle– Updating the ‘Ventilator Bundle’ to focus on VAP– Advancing science of process measurement
• CDC NHSN VAP definition is changing– Ventilator-Associated Event (VAE) algorithm
• Identification of contextual variables– Ethnographic studies
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011
Today is going to be a good day: Overview
Overview of the Day
• Details and requirements of the effort • Targeted topics to build unit plans
– Sr. Leader, – Physician, and – Patient and Family engagement
• Networking and planning to develop a unit level plan of action
• Data Collection and Data Entry Requirements • Introduction of CECity Platform
– Real time reporting, LMS, Social networking• Summary, Next Steps, and Adjourn
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality34
35
References-1
Slide 4Waxman, HA. Healthcare-associated infections: A preventable epidemic. Hearing, April 16, 2008; House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Washington DC.
Slide 5Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):2184-93.Kollef MH, Shorr A, Tabak YP, Gupta V, Liu LZ, Johannes RS. Epidemiology and outcomes of health-care-associated pneumonia: results from a large US database of culture-positive pneumonia. Chest. 2005 Dec;128(6):3854-62. Perencevich EN, Stone PW, Wright SB, Carmeli Y, Fishman DN, Cosgrove SE: Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Raising standards while watching the bottom line: making a business case for infection control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;28(10):1121-33.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
36
References-2
Slide 5, continuedKlevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, Cardo DM. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U. S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;122(2):160-6.
Slide 8http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/armstrong_institute
Slide 9Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, Sexton B, Hyzy R, Welsh R, Roth G, Bander J, Kepros J, Goeschel C. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2725-32.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
37
References-3
Slide 9, continuedPronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Colantuoni E, Watson S, Lubomski LH, Berenholtz SM, Thompson DA, Sinopoli DJ, Cosgrove S, Sexton JB, Marsteller JA, Hyzy RC, Welsh R, Posa P, Schumacher K, Needham D. Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study. BMJ. 2010 Feb 4;340:c309.Berenholtz SM, Pham JC, Thompson DA, Needham DM, Lubomski LH, Hyzy RC, Welsh R, Cosgrove SE, Sexton JB, Colantuoni E, Watson SR, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Collaborative cohort study of an intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):305-14.www.onthecuspstophai.org
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
38
References-4
Slide 10 www.onthecuspstophai.org
Slide 12Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, Lipsett PA, Simmonds T, Haraden C. Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals. J Crit Care. 2003 Jun;18(2):71-5.
Slide 13Berenholtz SM, Pham JC, Thompson DA, Needham DM, Lubomski LH, Hyzy RC, Welsh R, Cosgrove SE, Sexton JB, Colantuoni E, Watson SR, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Collaborative cohort study of an intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):305-14.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
39
References-5
Slide 14Berenholtz SM, Pham JC, Thompson DA, Needham DM, Lubomski LH, Hyzy RC, Welsh R, Cosgrove SE, Sexton JB, Colantuoni E, Watson SR, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Collaborative cohort study of an intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):305-14.
Slide 15Lipitz-Snyderman A, Steinwachs D, Needham DM, Colantuoni E, Morlock LL, Pronovost PJ. Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis. BMJ. 2011 Jan 28;342:d219.Waters HR, Korn R Jr, Colantuoni E, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel CA, Needham DM, Pham JC, Lipitz-Snyderman A, Watson SR, Posa P, Pronovost PJ. The business case for quality: economic analysis of the Michigan Keystone Patient Safety Program in ICUs. Am J Med Qual. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):333-9.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
40
References-6
Slide 18 Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, Bridges C, Hajjeh R; CDC; Healthcare
Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004 Mar 26;53z(RR-3):1-36.American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416.Muscedere J, Dodek P, Keenan S, Fowler R, Cook D, Heyland D; VAP Guidelines Committee and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. J Crit Care. 2008 Mar;23(1):138-47.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
41
References-7
Slide 18, continuedCoffin SE, Klompas M, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Anderson DJ, Burstin H, Calfee DP, Dubberke ER, Fraser V, Gerding DN, Griffin FA, Gross P, Kaye KS, Lo E, Marschall J, Mermel LA, Nicolle L, Pegues DA, Perl TM, Saint S, Salgado CD, Weinstein RA, Wise R, Yokoe DS. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29 Suppl 1:S31-40.
Slide 19Zolfaghari PS, Wyncoll DL. The tracheal tube: gateway to ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):310. Epub 2011 Sep 29. Speck K. Not published. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.Calleamanecer (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AClinicians_in_Intensive_Care_Unit.jpg
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
42
References-8
Slide 20ETT endotrachael tube; HME heat moist exchanger; NIVV non-
invasive ventilationSlide 21
Lancet 2009; 373: 1874–82
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
43
References-9
Slide 27
J Crit Care 2008;23:207-22; Crit Care Med 2011;39(5):1-6
Slide 28Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36:252-60Resources: www.safercare.net
Slide 29J Crit Care 2003;18(2):71-75
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality