Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

34
Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors Alan Huffman Center for Materials and Electronic Technologies [email protected]

description

Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors. Alan Huffman Center for Materials and Electronic Technologies [email protected]. Outline. Who is RTI? Solder Bump Technology Bumping process Post bump processes Wafers thinning Dicing control Hybridization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Page 1: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle

Detectors

Alan HuffmanCenter for Materials and Electronic

[email protected]

Page 2: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Outline• Who is RTI?• Solder Bump Technology

– Bumping process– Post bump processes

•Wafers thinning•Dicing control

– Hybridization• Current Programs and Results

– CMS– MEDIPIX

• Future Technologies for Hybridization– 3D integration technology– Alternative bump materials– Alternatives to sawing

Page 3: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

A Crisis of Identity…Who is RTI?

• RTI acquired the research groups formerly known as MCNC Research & Development Center in March 2005

• RTI/MCNC has over 15 years experience in the development and implementation of flip chip technology, including the spin off of Unitive Electronics in 1998 (Amkor)

• Fine pitch flip chip (<100 µm) has been ongoing since 1997

Page 4: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Important Points of Pixel Devices for Bumping• I/O pitch typically less than 100 µm• High interconnect counts, from a few

thousand to over 65,000• Large readout and sensor chip size (~ 1 cm2

and larger)• Multi-chip modules (MCM) typically needed to

create large area sensor arrays• Materials used must withstand high radiation

environment• Flux-free assembly processes are a necessity

Page 5: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Fine Pitch Solder Bumping

• Formation of fine pitch solder bumps uses essentially the same processes as ‘standard’ pitch flip chip

• Tighter control must be maintained over the processes than for typical wafer level packaging (WLP) applications due to smaller geometries

• Additional post-wafer bumping processes are sometimes needed (i.e. wafer thinning) which can easily damage small solder bumps

Page 6: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

RTI Fine Pitch Bumping Process Flow

Incoming Wafer With I/O Pads

Repassivation With BCB

UBM Deposition

Apply and Define Plating Template

Plate Solder or Wettable Metal

Strip Resist Template

Reflow

Etch Field UBM

Page 7: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Solder Bumped ROC and Sensor (US-CMS)

25 µm bump base diameter and 25 µm bump height

Ni/Au bump bonding pads

Page 8: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Solder Bumped ROC and Sensor (MEDIPIX)

50 µm pitch readout chip with eutectic Sn/Pb bumps

50 µm pitch sensor chip with Ni/Au bump bond pads

Page 9: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Post-Bumping Wafer Thinning• Wafer thinning is done after bumping to

prevent excessive handling and processing of thin wafers

• A protective layer is applied to the wafer to protect the bumps during the taping, thinning, and de-taping processes

• Wafer thinning process consists of two steps– Grind: to quickly remove Si from the wafer backside– Stress relief: to remove the damaged Si layer and

alleviate the stress created in the silicon during the grind• Protective layer is removed prior to dicing

Page 10: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Dicing Considerations• Thinned ROC wafers are more susceptible to

damage during dicing and require different blades and parameters

• Dicing kerf must be very close to the active area (50 µm or less) on ROCs to allow close placement in multi-chip module assembly

• Thin, high resistivity silicon sensors are susceptible to chipping and microcracking during dicing, which increases the leakage current

Page 11: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Poorly Diced Sensor Wafers

Page 12: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Cleanly Diced Sensor

Page 13: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Assembly Processes• Flip chip assembly of fine pitch bumped

devices requires high placement accuracy bonder

• Assembly of multi-chip module detectors have ROCs in very close proximity (~150 µm); process must not disturb previously placed die

• Use of flux for reflow is undesirable due to difficulty removing flux residue under large chips

Page 14: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

• Chip-to-substrate gap reduces from 65µm to 22µm for 25µm diameter bumps

Standard Vs. Fine-Pitch Assembly

250um Pitch 50um Pitch

Page 15: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Plasma Assisted Dry Soldering (PADS)• Replaces flux in

assembly process• Solder-bearing parts

treated prior to assembly

• Short (10-15 min) treatment time

• Leaves no residues on chip or substrate

• Proven applications in SMT, MEMS, photonics, and standard flip chip packaging and assembly processes

Page 16: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Current Programs

Page 17: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

CMS Detector Modules

• Readout chips are fabricated on full thickness 8-inch silicon wafers and are thinned to 200 µm prior to assembly, 4160 bumps per chip

• Sensor wafers are fabricated on thin, high resistivity wafers

• Bump size is 25 micron base diameter with a minimum I/O pitch of 50 microns

• 6 different module sizes: 1x1, 1x2, 1x5, 2x3, 2x4, 2x5• Full detector will require over 800 total modules with

about 5000 individual readout chips• Total number of bumped connections is over

20,000,000

Page 18: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

2x4 detector module in test fixtureCourtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration

Pixilated Detector Module Assemblies

Page 19: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Yield Data

• Recent evaluation of CMS detector modules (1x1, 1x2, 1x5, 2x3, 2x4, 2x5 arrays, 76 total modules)

– 1134 bad bump connections out of about 2,000,000– Bump bonding yield of 99.94%

• Leakage current measurements previously completed on 61 modules

– 60 of 61 modules meet leakage current specifications at 250V

– 59 of 61 modules meet leakage current specifications at 600V

– Power consumption on all modules within spec

Courtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration

Page 20: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Sensor Wafer 029

Yield Data

Courtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration

Page 21: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Yield Data

Courtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration

Page 22: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

MEDIPIX Consortium - CERN

• X-ray/gamma ray detector devices working in single photon counting mode

• 55 µm pitch, uniform in both directions• Detector modules of 1x1 (~1 in2) and 2x2 (~4

in2) • MEDIPIX ASIC is used in conjunction with

different sensor devices for a number of applications

– X-ray imaging– Biological radiography– Neutron detection

Page 23: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

MEDIPIX 2x2 detector array

Pixilated Detector Module Assemblies

Page 24: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

MEDIPIX2 Images

Courtesy: MEDIPIX Collaboration

Page 25: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

MEDIPIX2 Images

Courtesy: MEDIPIX Collaboration

Page 26: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Future Hybridization Technologies

• 3D Integration

• Alternative Bump Materials

• Alternative Singulation Processes

Page 27: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

3D Integration• Through via interconnects (TVI) are formed

through bulk silicon in active devices• Allows multiple device layers to be

interconnected front-to-back• TVIs can be formed before or after devices

are physically joined together– Significant process differences between vias first process

and vias last process– Process used dictated by device design and process

compatibility• Allows array sizes not limited to 1xN or 2xN

modules: true area array ROC placement

Page 28: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Benefits of 3D Integration: Pixelated Devices

Detector/Sensor Arrays

3-D ROIC

3-D Interconnects

• 3-D Integration allows massively parallel signal processing• Dramatically increased electronic functionality in each pixel

Actuator Arrays

3-D Interconnects

DARPA Coherent Communications, Imaging & Targeting (CCIT) program

Spatial light modulators

w/digital control of optical wave front

phasesMEMS

Actuator

Mirror

3-D Sensor Arrays• Large formats with high resolution• On-chip signal processing• Reduction of size, weight & power

3-D Actuator Arrays• Large formats with high resolution• Low switching energy & latency• Reduction of size, weight & power

Page 29: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Test Structure Operability Test

Demonstrated 99.98% operability in 256x256 arrays with 4 m vias on 30 m pitch

65,536 interconnects in ~1 cm2

Si IC25 m

Operability Map

Nonfunctional cell

20 m256x256 ROIC

Insulator

Copper

Si IC

14 Defective

pixels

Die # % Operable1 94.933 99.884 99.985 99.928 99.079 92.42

11 99.5912 99.5613 99.96

Page 30: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Imaging Demonstration

Demonstrated image from 256x256 MWIR FPA built on 2-layer stack with 4 mdiameter3-D interconnects (one per cell)

Passive Si layer

256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe Detector

VISA via

HDVIP via

Contact viaContact

landing pad

Passive Si layer

256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe Detector

VISA via

HDVIP via

Contact viaContact

landing pad

Passive Si layer

256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe Detector

VISA via

HDVIP via

Contact viaContact

landing pad

Passive Si layer

Active 256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe HDVIP Detector

VISA via 4 m diameter

detector contact

Contact via to ROICContact

landing pad

25 m

Epoxy

Passive Si layer

256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe Detector

VISA via

HDVIP via

Contact viaContact

landing pad

Passive Si layer

256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe Detector

VISA via

HDVIP via

Contact viaContact

landing pad

Passive Si layer

256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe Detector

VISA via

HDVIP via

Contact viaContact

landing pad

Passive Si layer

Active 256x256 ROIC

HgCdTe HDVIP Detector

VISA via 4 m diameter

detector contact

Contact via to ROICContact

landing pad

25 m

Epoxy

FPA cross section Thermal image

Page 31: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Alternative Bump Materials• Non-collapsible bump materials may be

useful for extremely small bump interconnections (~5 µm dia.)

Sn-capped Cu bumps

Page 32: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Alternatives to Saw Dicing• Silicon etching using Bosch process allows

damage-free singulation of ROCs and sensor devices

• Dicing streets must be free of metal

Deposit and pattern photoresist

Bosch etching

Bosch etching complete

Photoresist removal

Page 33: Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors

Copyright © 2004 MCNC-RDI. All rights reserved.

Conclusion

• RTI has developed a number of technologies to enable the successful bumping and hybridization of pixel devices

• Currently applying these technologies to CMS and MEDIPIX projects for detector manufacture

• New technologies under development will someday enable smaller pixel sizes in larger arrays with more functionality