Cumberland University School of Education Conceptual Framework SoE Conceptual Framework re… ·...
Transcript of Cumberland University School of Education Conceptual Framework SoE Conceptual Framework re… ·...
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 16 -
Cumberland University School of Education
Conceptual Framework
Background
The School of Education, and Cumberland University in general, has benefited
over the past several years from a significant series of change efforts. Changes in unit
faculty, student recruitment efforts at the institutional level, and the technological
capacity of the school have provided opportunities for growth and development and
challenges to the existing culture of the institution and the unit. Over the last five years,
the Master’s of Arts in Education program has been entirely revamped, moving to on-
line delivery from the use of an external vendor.
As a result, our faculty has been involved in a serious revisitation of the
conceptual framework, the philosophy that guides us collectively, and pedagogy that
should follow. This is a necessary process given the recent turnover in faculty, our
endeavor to become accredited, and changes in both the university and the School of
Education.
The School of Education has adopted an entirely new set of standards, those of
the International New Teachers Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC), and has
revised our Conceptual Framework in response to institutional changes in the University
Mission statement and changes in the professional education standards at the state and
national level; and we continue to update (the institution is currently revising its own
mission statement, and the unit remains poised to adapt to changes). Our Conceptual
Framework, as it stands, guides us toward pedagogy and content that focuses on
student achievement with significant emphasis on development of the knowledge,
dispositions, and skills, required professional educators in the present educational policy
and school contexts.
The Conceptual Framework is – necessarily and fundamentally – a working
document. It guides our practice today, but it is under review by the unit’s faculty
beyond the normal level of attention given to such a document. We have been since Fall
of 2007 critically and thoroughly examining our conceptual framework and assessment
system with the intention to improve it. Thus what is presented herein reflects the
philosophy, purposes, and goals of the unit, and by the time of our NCATE visit our
Conceptual Framework may have evolved again.
4.1 Institution’s And Unit’s Mission And Vision Statements
The Institution
Cumberland University is a regionally accredited institution of higher education
located in Lebanon, TN. The institution stresses it’s small size and ability to provide close
contacts between faculty and candidates. The primary responsibilities of the faculty
including teaching and advisement. While some of the faculty engage in research,
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 17 -
conference participation, publication, and grant writing, the institution is developing the
infrastructure to better support such scholarship. The institution serves a population
from the predominantly rural and increasingly ex-urban local area. Many candidates are
first-generation college attendees.
Institution Mission Statement
The mission of Cumberland University is to create a learning community of distinction
through a partnership among its students, faculty, staff, and the larger community. The
development of the whole student – intellectual, spiritual, psychosocial, physical,
creative – is emphasized in preparation for successful and responsible personal living,
for productive economic participation, and for constructive citizenship.
Institution Vision Statement
Cumberland University will be recognized as one of the best small private universities in
the region. Graduates will be prepared to secure their first choice of employment or
graduate school placement, succeed in careers, and become productive contributors to
their communities. In order to accomplish this vision, the faculty has collaborated on
professional commitments and dispositions for the delivery component of our program.
Institution Goals
1. Each graduate will demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and abilities characteristic of an
educated person.
2. Each graduate will demonstrate a depth of understanding in a selected field of study
and be prepared for entry into a meaningful career or advanced study.
3. Each graduate will have the opportunity to participate in community-based service
learning experience.
4. Each graduate will be facilitated in the development of the whole person through
recognition of his/her unique needs and interests and the academic programs,
student services, campus/residential life and athletic activities offered.
5. Students with developmental needs will be successfully integrated into regular
programs of study.
6. The instruction and evaluation methods utilized will be varied and diverse and
will utilize instructional and informational technology appropriate to course
objectives.
7. Sixty percent of students will graduate within four years of enrolling as freshmen.
8. The physical plant, instructional resources, technology and information systems will
enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of teaching, learning and operations.
9. The University community will honor (respect) differences characteristic of a
geographically and culturally diverse faculty and student body.
10. The quality of life in the larger community will be enhanced through planned
activities and programs that are responsive to community issues and interests.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 18 -
The Unit
At the Cumberland University School of Education, we our proud of our long-
held regional reputation for consistently preparing excellent educators for their work in
schools, from the classroom to the state’s administrative offices. We share a
commitment to staying ahead of changes in the educational world – whether related to
policy or practice – in order to not only maintain our reputation for excellence, but to
deliver an education based on best current practices and research-based knowledge so
that they in turn serve students and schools as professionally as possible.
Unit Mission Statement
Through appropriate modeling of teaching methods, advisement, clinical experiences,
assessment, and action research Cumberland University’s School of Education will
collaborate to create a viable learning community of distinction. The mission of the unit
is to prepare future educators to become “competent, caring, qualified professional
educators” and reflective practitioners. Our program of courses will provide candidates
opportunities to learn the interrelated themes of the common body of knowledge that
encompasses the essential skills, dispositions, and knowledge required by beginning
teachers.1
Unit Vision Statement
Through a shared vision, the faculty of the Cumberland University School of Education
strives to protect our status of being recognized by regional educators as a program that
produces educators who are “competent, caring, qualified professional educators” in a
changing world. Our faculty will continue to be aware of and prepare our candidates for
the constantly evolving policy, socio-cultural, and technology contexts of the classrooms
they will serve.
4.2 UNIT PHILOSOPHY, PURPOSE, AND GOALS:
Unit Purpose
The purpose of the programs in the School of Education is to produce graduates
who have mastered the knowledge, gained or enhanced the dispositions, and
demonstrated performance of skills required of professional educators of distinction.
Students should leave the program with the skills to continue to critically reflect on their
own practice in such a way that they can effectively strive for continual self-
improvement.
Unit Goals
The faculty of the School of Education strives to protect our status of being recognized
by regional educators as a program that produces educators who are “competent,
1 Due to an error in the printing of the 2007-2009 University catalog, the unit mission statement printed
on page 60 therein (see precondition 6.1) is incorrect.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 19 -
caring, qualified professional educators” in a changing world. Through content,
curriculum, and modeling, the goal of the faculty of the School of Education is to
produce candidates who:
1. … understand the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the
discipline(s) they teach and can create learning experiences that make these aspects
of subject matter meaningful for students.
2. … understand how children and youth learn and develop, and can provide learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social and personal development.
3. … understand how students differ in their approaches to learning, and create
instructional opportunities that are adapted to learners from diverse cultural
backgrounds and with exceptionalities.
4. … understand and use a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students’
development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
5. … use an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a
learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement
in learning, and self-motivation.
6. … use knowledge of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication
techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the
classroom.
7. … plan and manage instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students,
the community, and curriculum goals.
8. … understand and use formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and
ensure the continuous intellectual, social and physical development of their
students.
9. … are reflective practitioners who continually evaluate the effects of their choices
and actions on others (students, parents, and other professionals in the learning
community) and actively seek out opportunities to grow professionally.
10. … communicate and interact with parents/guardians, families, school colleagues,
and the community to support students’ learning and well-being.
The School of Education’s Conceptual Framework reflects the incorporation of
INTASC’s ten standards into our standing goal of creating caring, competent, and
qualified professional educators. INTASC’s standard-specific knowledge, dispositions,
and skills requirements represented in the colored boxes match CU’s goal of creating
the competent, caring, and qualified dimensions of professional educators. The arrows
between represent the interconnectedness of the various components of those
dimensions. The arrows also communicate that a professional educator is well versed in
each of the domains.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 20 -
Knowledge is equivalent to Competency. Professional educators must have not
only a deep understanding of and enthusiasm for their particular content area. They
must also be well versed in the most recent theories of learning, and be well equipped
with a variety of strategies for planning, instruction, and assessment.
Dispositions are equivalent to the attitudes and beliefs that create caring
teachers. Professional educators must have the belief that all students are capable of
growth and achievement. This is at the very core of their efficacy. They must
additionally be disposed toward the particular methods of motivation, guidance, and
classroom management that creates healthy learning environments. Finally, they must
be guided by an attitude that motivates them to communicate with each student,
parent, and community member for the benefit of their students’ development.
Qualified is equivalent to having demonstrated the skills to meet or exceed the
requirements of the professional aspects of being an effective member of the
educational community. This means they must be able model a strong personal and
professional ethic, they must know how to collaborate with peers and administrators,
and they must have the willingness and ability to engage in professional development,
both through seeking new knowledge and skills and through a regular process of critical
self-reflection.
Unit Philosophy
The School of Education faculty believe that:
CUMBERLAND
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL
OF EDUCATION
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 21 -
• … every candidate enters the teacher education program with a vast potential
for personal and professional growth, and that each candidate is deserving of the
attention and mentorship of the faculty toward our common goal of creating the
best possible teachers, administrators, and educators for the students of
Tennessee.
• … high quality teaching requires a deep knowledge of and enthusiasm for
content, pedagogy, and assessment techniques.
• … high quality teaching requires an orientation toward dispositions and beliefs
that create excellent learning environments.
• … high quality teaching requires the skills and behaviors reflective of a personal
ethic that meets or exceeds the requirements of the profession.
• … high quality teaching requires critical self-reflection that is at the core of
professionalism and self-improvement.
• … critical self-reflection that is at the core of professionalism and self-
improvement.
• … the best route to our goals is to stress through lecture, course work, and role
modeling the development not only of content and pedagogical knowledge, but
also the professional dispositions and practices required of teachers equipped to
adapt to and thrive in changing schools contexts.
4.3 KNOWLEDGE BASES, INCLUDING THEORIES, RESEARCH, THE WISDOM OF PRACTICE,
AND EDUCATION POLICIES, THAT INFORM THE UNIT’S CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Preparation to function as a professional in any field of endeavor requires that
an individual understand the Conceptual Framework around which knowledge in that
field is organized. The teacher preparation program at Cumberland University uses as its
foundation the concept of a common body of knowledge that encompasses the
knowledge, skills and dispositions to become competent, caring, qualified teachers, as
well as attributes of Cumberland University graduates.
Menand (2001) conveyed a statement, now nearly a century and a half old and
no less relevant, by James Fitzjames Stephens (1863) that “without belief [people]
cannot act.” Thus, action (performance) is impossible without dispositions (beliefs), and
furthermore the qualities of one’s dispositions are based on the depth of one’s
knowledge. Closing the loop, knowledge is informed by the experience that comes from
the performance of, and reflection on, any task. Dewey (1938) informs us that
experience is critical to learning, but that true learning gained is gained from reflection
on the experience that leads to new (corrected or improved) action and experience. This
interaction is graphically represented in the image on page 20.
From the unit’s professional educational core, students are expose to the
essential foundations frameworks for achieving each of the unit’s goals. The unit’s
curriculum, courses, field experiences and assessment are designed to reflect and
develop these outcomes so that candidates who complete the program exemplify the
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 22 -
“competent, caring qualified professional educators” that ideally represent Cumberland
University.
The Competent Professional Educator
Successful teachers not only know deeply and are enthusiastic about their
particular academic field. They must further be equipped with an equally deep
understanding the phases of human personal and intellectual development (and thus
how learning occurs in their particular students), and which among multiple
instructional strategies and assessments are most appropriate given circumstances. This
cluster of competencies leads to the ability to plan effective instruction for each
student.
We are committed to a learner-centered approach to instruction with an
emphasis on experiential learning (Dewey, 1938, 1959; Adler, 1982, Lambert &
McCombs, 1998). A learner-centered approach is based on constructivism, the view that
learners are active constructors of knowledge who filter new information through
screens of existing knowledge and personal experience. The learner-centered approach,
in contrast to the learning-centered approach, “is a natural process guided by individual
learners’ goals, arising from the activity itself and interactions with others stemming
from the activity, in which students try to make sense of their experience by
constructing knowledge, meaning and understanding” (Lambert & McCombs, 1998, p.
11). Though the learner is the center of this approach, it is not exclusive of the learnings
critical to the development of competent, caring and qualified professional educators.
By focusing on the learner, however, educators can understand how best to tailor
education so as to create the zones of proximal development that enhance permanent
learning Vygotsky (1978). This process reinforces mastery-learning approaches (Bloom,
1981; Carroll, 1963) for all students, and is based on the unit’s intention to meet diverse
student needs and learning styles though diverse teaching strategies (Boyer, 1983; Dill,
1996; Cochran-Smith, 1997; Imig, 1998; Gilligan, Garcia, 2002; Darling-Hammond, 2000).
Exposure to a curriculum on teaching alone is inadequate, however, for
comprehensive teacher preparation. Indeed, "Field experiences must be integrated
within the coursework expected of candidates and relevant to the advancement of their
skills" (Fetter, 2003). After acceptance into Teacher Education Phase I, candidates begin
field experiences during ED201, Education as a Profession, during which they observe
classes, and deliver a Junior Achievement curriculum. Thereafter, certain courses are
designated as requiring field experience components, during which candidates engage
in targeted observation activities, and gradually assume hands-on activities with
students; some courses include teaching experiences at the end of the semester in
which candidates deliver a lesson either planned by or in collaboration with their
cooperating teacher. Field experience culminates in their semester long student
teaching experience. Targeted observation activities are designed to reinforce practical
application, and practical (experiential) exercises are designed to reinforce the content
of the curriculum. This direct experiential engagement with classrooms and
administrative offices, combined with the knowledge and skills gained through the
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 23 -
curriculum, is essential to creating graduates who are fully aware of and prepared for
the changing realities of education in modern society.
The unit has recently increased its efforts to bring university faculty and public
school practitioners together for the purposes of improving the preparation of teacher
candidates thorough extensive embedded field experiences (Goodlad, 1990; Holmes
Group, 1986).
Commitment to Technology: technological literacy is an important factor in the
development of educational competence. The unit acknowledges the role of technology
in creating learning communities that respond to the needs of teachers and students.
The unit has defined technology literacy as a requirement for all candidates, including
skills in using technology to support instruction and to apply technology tools to
enhance professional growth and productivity.
The unit faculty is committed to providing students with opportunities beginning
early in their programs of study to gain basic computer skills and to use those skills to
access information, to create multimedia presentations, to manage data, and to
evaluate instructional software. Throughout their curriculum, students use technology
to enhance their own learning and develop instructional lessons and units that
incorporate varied instructional technologies. For example, both Livetext and
Blackboard Online delivery systems are utilized.
Bruner (1977, p. 88 italics in original) summarizes an important caveat:
The devices themselves cannot dictate their purpose. Unbridled enthusiasm for
[technologies] as panaceas overlooks the paramount importance of what one is
trying to accomplish. A perpetual feast of the best teaching [technologies] in the
world, unrelated to other techniques of teaching, could produce bench-bound
passivity.
While Bruner spoke of films and teaching machines, his point is no less relevant in the
world of web 2.0 teaching applications: technologies are part of a cluster of tools
available to teachers that should never be relied upon to replace effort on their part.
This leads to “gimmickry” that helps “neither the teacher nor the student” (Bruner,
1977, p. 91). Thus while technological literacy is a prerequisite for anyone seeking to
teach, it is necessary but not sufficient to becoming a good teacher. In short good
teaching is centered in the educator and no teaching aid is sufficient proxy. Candidates
are instructed in ways to use technology as a means to enrich, not replace, the
performance of their multiple duties (instructor, assessor, communicator, collaborator,
reflective practitioner).
The Caring Professional Educator
Caring professional educators understand, value and utilize student diversity for
collective self-improvement, can create safe learning environments for all students, and
seek to communicate in mutually beneficial ways with students, parents, and
stakeholders.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 24 -
The development and strengthening of a professional ethic is critical to success
as an educator, whether the context is classroom or administrative offices. Education,
though not unique in this sense, is unlike many other professions because it combines
characteristics of being a science and an art. Successful practitioners must effectively
balance proficiency in knowledge, theory, and practice (the Science) with an ethic of
care (Gilligan, 1993; Noddings, 2003), knowledge of professional standards, and
intrapersonal and interpersonal skills required in reflection and collaboration (the Art).
Delivering a curriculum that instructs to both dimensions, we believe, leads to the
development of the whole individual. An introspective process of education that leads
to personal clarification of the candidate’s strengths, beliefs and values, as well as their
purposes and goals for becoming an educator gives candidates the tools to manage
their own continuing education even as they evolve as practitioners in the field. This in
turn undergirds their working knowledge of the pedagogical skills and content material
most effective in their settings.
The unit is committed to preparing educators who appreciate the diverse nature
of learners and their varied economic, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds. Recognizing
that “low expectations can serve as self-fulfilling prophecies” (Weinstein, 1998, p. 83)
the unit is committed to developing teachers who are able to foster valuation and
celebration of all learners. The creation of viable learning communities that promote
positive attitudes toward diversity and develop inclusive models of instruction is a
strongly held value among unit faculty.
Educators must be aware of individual variations within each area of
development and appreciate and respect diverse talents and viewpoints among their
students and their families (Friend & Bursuck, 2002; Garcia, 2002; Lynch & Hanson,
1998; Lue, 2001). The ability to adapt instruction to individual differences as well as to
incorporate students’ cultural and community diversity into the classroom is a valued
skill emphasized and modeled throughout the teacher preparation curriculum and in the
instructional practices of the faculty. Through varied field and clinical experiences in
area schools, candidates have the opportunity to interact with an increasing variety of
culturally diverse and exceptional learners.
With this background and teaching experience, unit graduates will be trained to
respond with different approaches until students succeed. Modification, adaptations,
and interventions, are emphasized.
Among many others, a primary task for our schools is to provide a safe, secure
environment for children. Indeed, safety is primary among Maslow’s (1970) hierarchy of
needs. Optimally this environment is conducive to personally meaningful learning and
personal growth for each child. To achieve this goal, educators must conceptualize
safety as involving not only physical, but academic, emotional, social, and behavioral
safety (Bluestein, 2001), and be able to create learning environments that guarantee
these safeties. To teach without “coercion” (Glasser 1992) reflects an ethic of care and
leads to the development of independent, confident, and critical thinkers.
The Qualified Professional Educator
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 25 -
Cochran-Smith (2006, p. xxxvi) argues that “all teacher education practice…is
political.” SoE faculty recognize that our decisions about what to teach and not teach
stem from our own personal backgrounds and training, our biases and beliefs, and our
professional opinions (research-based or otherwise) about what is important enough to
dedicate our time and effort too. We recognize too that we will not be sufficiently doing
our jobs if all we did was inculcate our students with the products of those decisions.
We therefore are dedicated to also giving candidates the skills to continue their own
professional growth after their degree.
The practices of reflective teaching are important to the maintenance of a
personal and ethical keel steadying the graduate in shifting policy, school, and student
contexts. Reflective practice should not only generate an “ethic of critique” (Shapiro and
Stefkovich, 2001, p. 13) that disposes an individual to “formulate the hard questions,
and debate and challenge the issues” related to the systemic status quo; it should also
lead a practitioner to look critically at their own practice, and define strengths and
weaknesses.
Reflecting practice guides professional development by allowing educators to
know themselves (as the Oracle of Delphi instructed). Knowledge of self, including
strengths and weaknesses, allows educators to understand what sort of professional
development opportunities to avail themselves of, and where they themselves can
serve to strengthen the practices of others through collaboration with peers.
Effective collaboration between teachers is critical not only to self-improvement,
but to student and school success. Key to meaningful collaboration are communication
practices grounded in a professional oral and written communication skill. Professional
communications skills further enhance the relationship between the teacher and the
administrator, and the teacher and external stakeholders such as parents and
concerned community members.
The unit has recently begun to explore ways in which it can effectively integrate
action research into its MAE programs. Action research attempts to make research both
relevant and meaningful (Hitchcock and Hughes, 1993; Kennedy, 1997; Strickland,
1988), and give practitioners skills to seek solutions to problems of practice. The ability
to conduct, analyze, and interpret their own research ensures that candidates develop
and maintain skills as practical problem solvers in the ever-changing classroom situation
(Calhoun, 2002). This will allow candidates to have the opportunity to conduct and share
investigations of their own classroom problems or concerns for the benefit of their own
practice and their collaborators and peers.
4.4 CANDIDATE PROFICIENCIES
The proficiencies we desire of candidates are well reflected in INTASC’s
framework of standards and proficiencies. Unit faculty adopted the majority of those
standards in the Summer of 2008 in a painstaking process of line item review. Some of
the proficiencies under each of INTASC’s standards were adapted to reflect the unit’s
previous proficiencies, some were rejected, and a few proficiencies were added to
reflect either the faculty’s expectations of students or another professional accrediting
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 26 -
organization’s (SPA) proficiency. The unit’s proficiencies are detailed below; the original
INTASC standards and proficiencies are included in Appendix A for comparison.
Standard 1: Subject Matter Knowledge Candidates understand the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) they
teach and can create learning experiences that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful for
students.
Knowledge 1K1: Candidates are grounded in the historical, sociological, and scientific foundations of education.
1K2: Candidates understand major concepts, assumptions, debates, processes of inquiry, and ways of
knowing that are central to the discipline(s) they teach.
1K3: Candidates can relate their disciplinary knowledge to other subject areas.
1K4: The successful candidate understands why and how written measurable learning objectives
(standards) relate to formally and informally identified diverse learner needs.
Dispositions 1D1: Candidates apply critical thinking strategies for solutions to “real-world pedagogical problems”
related to teaching, learning, school performance and education reform.
1D2: Candidates realize that subject matter knowledge is not a fixed body of facts but is complex and
ever-evolving. They seek to keep abreast of new ideas and understandings in the field.
1D3: Candidates appreciate multiple perspectives and convey to learners how knowledge is developed
from the vantage point of the knower.
1D4: Candidates have enthusiasm for the discipline(s) they teach and make connections to everyday life.
1D5: Candidates are committed to continuous learning and engages in professional discourse about
subject matter knowledge and children’s learning of the discipline.
Performances 1P1: Candidates demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of their subject matter by being able to
plan instruction and make subject matter meaningful to students.
1P2: Candidates are aware of and can instruct the interconnections of contemporary issues or trends
related to their subject or discipline and project future.
1P3: Candidates effectively represent and use multiple representations, theories, methods of inquiry, and
explanations of disciplinary concepts that capture key ideas and link them to students’ prior
understandings.
1P4: Candidates can evaluate teaching resources and curriculum materials for their comprehensiveness,
accuracy, and usefulness for representing particular ideas and concepts.
1P5: Candidates engage students in generating knowledge and testing hypotheses according to the
methods of inquiry and standards of evidence used in the discipline.
1P6: Candidates develop and use curricula that encourage students to see, question, and interpret ideas
from diverse perspectives.
1P7: Candidates can create interdisciplinary learning experiences that allow students to integrate
knowledge, skills, and methods of inquiry from several subject areas.
Standard 2: Learning Theory Candidates understand how children and youth learn and develop, and can provide learning
opportunities that support their intellectual, social and personal development.
Knowledge 2K1: Candidates understand how students differ in their approaches to learning and is effective in
creating instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
2K2: Candidates understand how learning occurs – how students construct knowledge, acquire skills, and
develop habits of mind – and knows how to use instructional strategies that promote student learning.
2K3: Candidates understand that students’ physical, social, emotional, moral and cognitive development
influence learning and know how to address these factors when making instructional decisions.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 27 -
2K4: Candidates are aware of expected developmental progressions and ranges of individual variation
within each domain (physical, social, emotional, moral and cognitive), can identify levels of readiness in
learning, and understand how development in any one domain may affect performance in others.
Dispositions 2D1: Candidates appreciate that children come to the classroom with different backgrounds, abilities and
expectations, and candidates are disposed to use this knowledge as a basis for their professional practice.
2D2: Candidates begin teaching with confidence and commitment to the classroom with the expectation
that they will reach all students and promote intellectual growth.
2D3: Candidates appreciate individual variation within each area of development, show respect for the
diverse talents of all learners, and are committed to help them develop self confidence and competence.
2D4: Candidates are disposed to use students’ strengths as a basis for growth, and their errors as an
opportunity for learning.
Performances 2P1: Candidates use knowledge of child development and group performance to provide learning
opportunities that support learners’ current needs in each domain (cognitive, social, emotional, moral,
and physical) and that leads to the next level of development.
2P2: Candidate stimulates student reflection on prior knowledge and links new ideas to already familiar
ideas by making connections to students’ experiences, providing opportunities for the active engagement,
manipulation, and testing of ideas and materials.
2P3: Candidates access students’ thinking and experiences as a basis for instructional activities by being
able to ask challenging questions, listen carefully to and assess responses, and encourage discussion.
Standard 3: Diverse Learners Candidates understand how students differ in their approaches to learning, and create instructional
opportunities that are adapted to learners from diverse cultural backgrounds and with exceptionalities.
Knowledge 3K1: Candidates understand other cultural traditions in order to gain a perspective on personal values and
the similarities and differences among individuals and groups and can sensitively and effectively teach to
diverse groups of students.
3K2: Candidates understand and can identify differences in approaches to learning and performance,
including different learning styles, multiple intelligences, and performance modes, and can design
instruction that helps use students’ strengths as the basis for growth.
3K3: Candidates know about areas of exceptionality in learning – including learning disabilities, visual and
perceptual difficulties, and special physical or mental challenges.
3K4: Candidates know about the process of second language acquisition and about strategies to support
the learning of students whose first language is not English.
3K5: Candidates understand how students’ learning is influenced by individual experiences, talents, and
prior learning, as well as language, culture, family and community values.
3K6: Candidates have a well-grounded framework for understanding cultural and community diversity and
know how to learn about and incorporate students’ experiences, cultures, and community resources into
instruction.
Dispositions 3D1: Candidates are proactive in the promotion of the education of all children, including those with
exceptional and diverse backgrounds.
3D2: Candidates appreciate that the differences – whether demographic or ideological – between people
are an invitation to, and will be embraced as, an opportunity for discussion and growth.
3D3: Candidates believe that all children can learn at high levels and persist in helping all children achieve
success.
3D4: Candidates appreciate and value human diversity, show respect for students’ varied talents and
perspectives, and are committed to the pursuit of “individually configured excellence.”
3D5: Candidates respect students as individuals with differing personal and family backgrounds and
various skills, talents, and interests.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 28 -
3D6: Candidates are sensitive to community and cultural norms.
3D7: Candidates make students feel valued for their potential as people and help them learn to value
each other.
Performances 3P1: Candidates bring multiple perspectives to the discussion of subject matter, including attention to
students’ personal, family, and community experiences and cultural norms.
3P2: Candidates create a learning community in which individual differences are respected.
3P3: Candidates seek to understand students’ families, cultures, and communities, and use this
information as a basis for connecting instruction to students’ experiences (e.g. drawing explicit
connections between subject matter and community matters, making assignments that can be related to
students’ experiences and cultures).
3P4: Candidates use knowledge of students’ stages of development, learning styles, strengths, and needs
to make appropriate provisions for the education of all children, including those with exceptional and
diverse backgrounds or who have particular learning differences or needs.
3P5: Candidates can select and use various teaching methodologies, strategies, and resources and support
mechanisms that are sensitive to the multiple experiences of learners and to develop learning
communities.
3P6: Candidates can identify when and how to access appropriate services or resources to meet
exceptional learning needs.
3P7: Candidates can apply technology to support diverse learner needs.
Standard 4: Instructional Strategies Candidates understand and use a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students’
development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
Knowledge 4K1: Candidates understand principles and techniques associated with, along with the advantages and
limitations of, various instructional strategies (e.g. cooperative learning, direct instruction, discovery
learning, whole group discussion, independent study, interdisciplinary instruction).
4K2: Candidates understand individual and group motivation and behavior.
4K3: Candidates use effective verbal and nonverbal strategies to foster active inquiry, collaboration, and
supportive interaction in the classroom.
4K4: Candidates understand the cognitive processes associated with various kinds of learning (e.g. critical
and creative thinking, problem structuring and problem solving, invention, memorization and recall) and
how these processes can be stimulated.
4K5: Candidates know how to enhance learning through the use of a wide variety of materials as well as
human and technological resources (e.g. computers, audio-visual
technologies, videotapes and discs, local experts, primary documents and artifacts, texts, reference books,
literature, and other print resources).
Dispositions 4D1: Candidates value the development of students’ critical thinking, independent problem solving, and
performance capabilities.
4D2: Candidates value flexibility and reciprocity in the teaching process as necessary for adapting
instruction to student responses, ideas, and needs.
Performances 4P1: Candidates apply critical thinking strategies for solutions to “real-world problems” related to
teaching, learning, school performance and education reform.
4P2: Candidates use strategies to create a learning environment that encourages positive social
interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.
4P3: Candidates carefully evaluate how to achieve learning goals, choosing alternative teaching strategies
and materials to achieve different instructional purposes and to meet student needs (e.g. developmental
stages, prior knowledge, learning styles, and interests).
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 29 -
4P4: Candidates use multiple teaching and learning strategies to engage students in active learning
opportunities that promote the development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance
capabilities and that help student assume responsibility for identifying and using learning resources.
4P5: Candidates constantly monitor and adjust strategies in response to learner feedback.
4P6: Candidates vary their role in the instructional process (e.g. instructor, facilitator, coach, audience) in
relation to the content and purposes of instruction and the needs of students.
4P7: Candidates develop a variety of clear, accurate presentations and representations of concepts, using
alternative explanations to assist students’ understanding and presenting diverse perspectives to
encourage critical thinking.
Standard 5: Learning Environment Candidates use an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a learning
environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-
motivation.
Knowledge 5K1: Candidates understand how to use physical space and classroom accoutrements to create safe and
orderly learning environments.
5K2: Candidates understand different instructional means for establishing safe, effective, socially and
emotionally secure learning environments.
5K3: Candidates can use knowledge about human motivation and behavior drawn from the foundational
sciences of psychology, anthropology, and sociology to develop strategies conducive to creating the most
effective culture for learning.
5K4: Candidates understand individual and group motivation and behavior and can use strategies to
create a learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning,
and self-motivation.
5K5: Candidates understand how social groups function and influence people, and how people influence
groups.
5K6: Candidates know how to help people work productively and cooperatively with each other in
complex social settings.
5K7: Candidates understand the principles of effective classroom management and can use a range of
strategies to promote positive relationships, cooperation, and purposeful learning in the classroom.
5K8: Candidates recognize factors and situations that are likely to promote or diminish intrinsic
motivation, and know how to help students become self-motivated.
Dispositions 5D1: Candidates appreciate that trust between adults and children is paramount.
5D2: Candidates value a competent, caring, nurturing approach to creating a learning community.
5D3: Candidates take responsibility for establishing a positive climate in the classroom and participate in
maintaining such a climate in the school as whole.
5D4: Candidates understand how participation supports commitment, and are committed to the
expression and use of democratic values in the classroom.
5D5: Candidates value the role of students in promoting each other's learning and recognizes the
importance of peer relationships in establishing a climate of learning.
5D6: Candidates recognize the value of intrinsic motivation to students’ life-long growth and learning.
5D7: Candidates are committed to the continuous development of individual students’ abilities and
considers how different motivational strategies are likely to encourage this development for each
student.
Performances 5P1: Candidates are able to create physically, socially, and emotionally safe learning environments
characterized by appropriate levels of trust between themselves and their students.
5P2: Candidates create a smoothly functioning learning community in which students assume
responsibility for themselves and one another, participate in decision making, work collaboratively and
independently, and engage in purposeful learning activities.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 30 -
5P3: Candidates engage students in individual and cooperative learning activities that help them develop
the motivation to achieve by, for example, relating lessons to students’ personal interests, allowing
students to have choices in their learning, and leading students to ask questions and pursue problems
that are meaningful to them.
5P4: Candidates organize, , and manage the resources of time, space, activities, and attention to
independent and group work in ways that ensure active and equitable engagement of students in
productive tasks.
5P5: Candidates maximize the amount of class time spent in learning by creating expectations and
processes for communication and behavior.
5P6: Candidates help the group to develop shared values and expectations for student interactions,
academic discussions, and individual and group responsibility that create a positive classroom climate of
openness, mutual respect, support, and inquiry.
5P7: Candidates analyze the classroom environment and makes decisions and adjustments to enhance
social relationships, student motivation and engagement, and productive work.
Standard 6: Communication Candidates use knowledge of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to
foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the classroom.
Knowledge 6K1: Candidates realize that as teachers all of their actions – intentional or not – represent nonverbal as
well as verbal communication between the school and the community.
6K2: Candidates understand communication theory, language development, and the role of language in
learning.
6K3: Candidates understand how cultural and gender differences can affect communication in the
classroom.
6K4: Candidates know about and can use effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication
techniques.
Dispositions 6D1: Candidates understand that their language and writing skills create impressions in others of their
teaching ability, competence, and level of professionalism.
6D2: Candidates appreciate the importance of listening and non-verbal communication skills in being
thoughtful and responsive listeners.
6D3: Candidates recognize the power of language for fostering self-expression, identity development, and
learning.
6D4: Candidates value the many ways in which people seek to communicate, and encourage many modes
of communication in the classroom.
6D5: Candidates appreciate the cultural dimensions of communication, respond appropriately, and seek
to foster culturally sensitive communication by and among all students in the class.
Performances 6P1: Candidates effectively use technology as a communications tool with students, other educators, and
community stakeholders.
6P2: Candidates know how to use a variety of media communication tools, including audio-visual aids and
computers, to enrich learning opportunities.
6P3: Candidates model effective skills in writing, reading, and speaking English clearly in conveying ideas
and information not only with students, but with colleagues and community members.
6P4: Candidates support and expand learner expression in speaking, writing, and other media.
6P5: Candidates know how to ask questions and stimulate discussion in different ways for particular
purposes, for example: probing for learner understanding, helping students articulate their ideas and
thinking processes, promoting risk-taking and problem-solving, facilitating factual recall, encouraging
convergent and divergent thinking, stimulating curiosity, helping students to question.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 31 -
6P6: Candidates communicate in ways that demonstrate a sensitivity to cultural and gender differences
(e.g. appropriate use of eye contact, interpretation of body language and verbal statements,
acknowledgment of and responsiveness to different modes of communication and participation).
6P7: Candidates are open to constructive advice for improvement.
Standard 7: Planning Instruction Candidates plan and manage instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the
community, and curriculum goals.
Knowledge 7K1: Candidates are proactive in the promotion of learning in all children, including those with exceptional
and diverse backgrounds.
7K2: Candidates apply critical thinking strategies for solutions to “real-world problems” related to
teaching, learning, school performance, and education reform.
7K3: Candidates understand why and how written measurable learning objectives (standards) relate to
formally and informally identified diverse learner needs.
7K4: Candidates understand the impact and role of accountability assessments (TCAP) and can use
existing data to plan instruction and create curricula related to test results, balanced against the current
needs-based assessments.
7K5: Candidates understand the promises and problems of planning instruction in a data-driven decision-
making environment.
7K6: Candidates understand how students differ in their approaches to learning and are effective in
creating instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
7K7: Candidates understand learning theory, subject matter, curriculum development, community needs,
and student development and know how to use this knowledge in planning instruction to meet
curriculum goals.
7K8: Candidates know how to take contextual considerations (instructional materials, individual student
interests, needs, and aptitudes, and community resources) into account in planning instruction that
creates an effective bridge between curriculum goals and students’ experiences.
7K9: Candidates know when and how to adjust plans based on student responses and other
contingencies.
Dispositions 7D1: Candidates value both long term and short term instructional planning.
7D2: Candidates believe that plans must always be open to adjustment and revision based on student
needs and changing circumstances.
7D3: Candidates value and strive for planning as a collegial activity.
Performances 7P1: Candidates plan instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and
curriculum goals.
7P2: As an individual and a member of a team, candidates select and create learning experiences that are
appropriate for curriculum goals, relevant to learners, and based upon principles of effective instruction
(e.g. that activate students’ prior knowledge, anticipate preconceptions, encourage exploration and
problem-solving, and build new skills on those previously acquired).
7P3: Candidates plan for learning opportunities that recognize and address variation in learning styles and
performance modes.
7P4: Candidates create lessons and activities that operate at multiple levels to meet the developmental
and individual needs of diverse learners and help each progress.
7P5: Candidates create short-range and long-term plans that are linked to student needs and
performance, and adapt the plans to ensure and capitalize on student progress and motivation.
7P6: Candidates respond to unanticipated sources of input, evaluate plans in relation to short- and long-
range goals, and systematically adjust plans to meet student needs and enhance learning.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 32 -
Standard 8: Assessment Candidates understand and use formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure the
continuous intellectual, social and physical development of their students.
Knowledge 8K1: Candidates understand why and how written measurable learning objectives relate to formally and
informally identified diverse learner needs.
8K2: Candidates have learned assessment methodologies for individual, classroom, and school-level
performance methodologies including, but not limited to, application of individualized services,
instructional plans, and school improvements.
8K3: Candidates understand and use formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure
the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of learners.
8K4: Candidates understand the characteristics, uses, advantages, and limitations of different types of
assessments (e.g. criterion-referenced and norm-referenced instruments, traditional standardized and
performance-based tests, observation systems, and assessments of student work) for evaluating how
students learn, what they know and are able to do, and what kinds of experiences will support their
further growth and development.
8K5: Candidates know how to select, construct, and use assessment strategies and instruments
appropriate to the learning outcomes being evaluated and to other diagnostic
purposes.
8K6: Candidates understand measurement theory and assessment-related issues, such as validity,
reliability, bias, and scoring concerns.
Dispositions 8D1: Candidates favor rigorous assessment as a formative tool for improving teaching rather than as a
means to label students.
8D2: Candidates value ongoing assessment as essential to the instructional process and recognize that
many different assessment strategies, accurately and systematically used, are necessary for monitoring
and promoting student learning.
8D3: Candidates are committed to using assessment to identify student strengths and promote student
growth.
Performances 8P1: Candidates evaluate the effect of class activities on both individuals and the class as a whole,
collecting information through observation of classroom interactions, questioning, and analysis of student
work.
8P2: Candidates use multiple methods for measuring student growth and understanding to enhance their
knowledge of learners, evaluate students’ progress and performances, and modify teaching and learning
strategies and they can clearly explain student performance to parents.
8P3: Candidates solicit and use information about students’ experiences, learning behavior, needs, and
progress from parents, other colleagues, and the students themselves.
8P4: Candidates use assessment strategies to involve learners in self-assessment activities, to help them
become aware of their strengths and needs, and to encourage them to set personal goals for learning.
8P5: Candidates monitor their own teaching strategies and behavior in relation to student success,
modifying plans and instructional approaches accordingly.
8P6: Candidates maintain useful records of student work and performance and can communicate student
progress knowledgeably and responsibly, based on appropriate indicators, to students, parents, and other
colleagues.
Standard 9: Reflection and Professional Development Candidates are reflective practitioners who continually evaluate the effects of their choices and actions
on others (students, parents, and other professionals in the learning community) and actively seek out
opportunities to grow professionally.
Knowledge
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 33 -
9K1: Candidates understand methods of inquiry that provide them with a variety of self-assessment and
problem-solving strategies for reflecting on their practice, its influences on students’ growth and learning,
and the complex interactions between them.
9K2: Candidates are aware of major areas of research on teaching and of resources available for
professional learning (e.g. professional literature, colleagues, professional associations, professional
development activities).
9K3: Candidates use concepts from across academic disciplines to understand themselves and their
relationships with other people, can comprehend the nature and function of communities, and use this
knowledge to the benefit of their teaching.
Dispositions 9D1: Successful candidates supports and values continuous professional growth and development,
including roles in organizations, publications, and meetings.
9D2: Candidates develop a perspective on social, political, and economic issues for resolving societal and
professional problems.
9D3: Candidates exemplify personal and professional ethics in making judgments both in and outside the
classroom.
9D4: Candidates value critical thinking and self-directed learning as habits of mind.
9D5: Candidates are committed to reflection, assessment, and learning as an ongoing process.
9D6: Candidates are willing to give and receive help.
9D7: Candidates are committed to seeking out, developing, and continually refining practices that address
the individual needs of students.
9D8: Candidates recognize their professional responsibility for engaging in and supporting appropriate
professional practices for self and colleagues.
Performances 9P1: Candidates locate, evaluate, interpret and integrate research in teaching and learning to the benefit
of their teaching practice.
9P2: Candidates model what it means to be an educated person – they read, they question, they create,
and they are willing to try new things.
9P4: Candidates use classroom observation, information about students, and research as sources for
evaluating the outcomes of teaching and learning and as a basis for experimenting with, reflecting on, and
revising practice.
9P5: Candidates seek out professional literature, colleagues, and other resources to support their own
development as learners and teachers and to stay abreast of current issues in American education (both
learning, instructional, and classroom management strategies as well as educational issues of social or
political importance).
9P6: Candidates are aware of and reflect on their practice in light of research on teaching, professional
ethics, and resources available for professional learning; they continually evaluate the effects of their
professional decisions and actions on students, families and other professionals in the learning
community and actively seek out opportunities to grow professionally.
Standard 10: Collaboration, Ethics, Relationships Candidates communicate and interact with parents/guardians, families, school colleagues, and the
community to support students’ learning and well-being.
Knowledge 10K1: Candidates understand and are committed to ethical and professional standards.
10K2: Candidates know and understand their own personal biases and understand that such ownership is
an essential requirement for avoiding acting upon those biases to the advantage or disadvantage of
particular students.
10K3: Candidates apply and can integrate knowledge, skills and dispositions during clinical experiences via
school/university collaborative activities in partnership schools.
10K4: Candidates develop a perspective on social, political, and economic issues for resolving societal and
professional problems.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 34 -
10K5: Candidates understand schools as organizations within the larger community context and
understands the operations of the relevant aspects of the system(s) within which they work.
10K6: Candidates understand how factors in the students’ environment outside of school (e.g. family
circumstances, community environments, health and economic conditions) may influence students’ life
and learning.
10K7: Candidates understand and implement laws related to students’ rights and teacher responsibilities
(e.g. for equal education, appropriate education for handicapped students, confidentiality, privacy,
appropriate treatment of students, reporting in situations related to possible child abuse).
Dispositions 10D1: Candidates know the importance of establishing and maintaining a positive collaborative
relationship with families, school colleagues, and agencies in the larger community to promote the
intellectual, social, emotional, physical growth and well-being of children.
10D2: Candidates value and appreciate the importance of all aspects of a child’s experience.
10D3: Candidates are concerned about all aspects of a child’s wellbeing (cognitive, emotional, social, and
physical), and are alert to signs of difficulties.
10D4: Candidates are willing to consult with other adults regarding the education and well-being of their
students.
10D5: Candidates respect the privacy of students and confidentiality of information.
10D6: Candidates are willing to work with other professionals to improve the overall learning
environment for students.
Performances 10P1: Candidates participate in collegial activities designed to make the entire school a productive
learning environment.
10P2: Candidates make links with the learners’ other environments on behalf of students by consulting
with parents, counselors, teachers of other classes and activities within the schools, and professionals in
other community agencies.
10P3: Candidates can identify and use community resources to foster student learning.
10P4: Candidates establish respectful and productive relationships with parents and guardians from
diverse home and community situations, and seek to develop cooperative partnerships in support of
student learning and well being.
10P5: Candidates talk with and listen to the students, are sensitive and responsive to clues of distress,
investigate situations, and seek outside help as needed and appropriate to remedy problems.
10P6: Candidates advocate for students.
10P7: Candidates work with other professionals on instructional policy, curriculum development and staff
development.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 35 -
Table 4.1
CANDIDATE PROFICIENCIES ALIGNED WITH THE EXPECTATIONS IN PROFESSIONAL, STATE, AND INSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS
(Tennessee’s Licensure Standards can be found here.)
Conceptual
Framework
Professional Standard (INTASC)/ Unit Goals Candidate
Proficiencies
TN
Teacher
Licensure
Standards
Assessment System
Co
mp
ete
nt
(Co
nte
nt
Kn
ow
led
ge
, Le
arn
ing
Th
eo
ry,
Inst
ruct
ion
al S
tra
teg
ies,
Pla
nn
ing
In
stru
ctio
n,
Ass
ess
me
nt)
1. Candidates understand the central concepts,
tools of inquiry, and structures of the
discipline(s) they teach and can create learning
experiences that make these aspects of subject
matter meaningful for students.
2. Candidates understand how children and
youth learn and develop, and can provide
learning opportunities that support their
intellectual, social and personal development.
4.Candidates understand and use a variety of
instructional strategies to encourage students’
development of critical thinking, problem
solving, and performance skills.
7. Candidates plan and manage instruction based
upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the
community, and curriculum goals.
8. Candidates plan and manage instruction based
upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the
community, and curriculum goals.
1K1-4
1D1-5
1P1-7
2K1-4
2D1-4
2P1-3
4K1-5
4D1-2
4P1-7
7K1-9
7D1-3
7P1-6
8K1-6
8D1-3
8P1-6
Dis
cip
lin
e T
au
gh
t; S
tud
en
t Le
arn
ing
& D
eve
lop
me
nt;
Pla
nn
ing
;
Te
ach
ing
Str
ate
gie
s; A
sse
ssm
en
t &
Eva
lua
tio
n
Program Admission
• GRE (MAE); ACT (Baccalaureate)
• GPA
• References
TEP I Admission (Baccalaureate)
• GPA
• References
• Interview
TEP II Admission (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• GPA
• References
• Portfolio review (summative)
• Interview
Student Teaching (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• Lesson plan evaluations
• Lesson observations
• Comprehensive evaluation form
• Seminar activities
• Portfolio (formative)
Program Completion (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• GPA
• Portfolio (summative)
• Interview (Baccalaureate only)
• Comprehensive Exam (MAE only)
• Completion of Licensing Process
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 36 -
Ca
rin
g (
Div
ers
e L
ea
rne
rs,
Lea
rnin
g
En
vir
on
me
nt,
Co
mm
un
ica
tio
n)
3. Candidates understand how students differ in
their approaches to learning, and create
instructional opportunities that are adapted to
learners from diverse cultural backgrounds and
with exceptionalities.
5. Candidates use an understanding of individual
and group motivation and behavior to create a
learning environment that encourages positive
social interaction, active engagement in learning,
and self-motivation.
6. Candidates use knowledge of effective verbal,
nonverbal, and media communication
techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration,
and supportive interaction in the classroom.
3K1-6
3D1-7
3P1-7
5K1-8
5D1-7
5P1-7
6K1-4
6D1-5
6P1-7
Div
ers
e L
ea
rne
rs;
Lea
rnin
g E
nvir
on
me
nt;
Co
mm
un
ica
tio
n
TEP I Admission (Baccalaureate only)
• References
• Portfolio review (formative)
• Interview
TEP II Admission (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• References
• Portfolio review (summative)
• Interview
Student Teaching (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• Lesson plan evaluations
• Lesson observations
• Comprehensive evaluation form
• Seminar activities
• Portfolio (formative)
Program Completion (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• Portfolio (summative)
• Interview (Baccalaureate only)
• Comprehensive Exam (MAE only)
• Completion of Licensing Process
Qu
ali
fie
d
(Re
fle
ctio
n a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al
de
ve
lop
me
nt,
Co
lla
bo
rati
on
, e
thic
s,
rela
tio
nsh
ips)
9. Candidates are reflective practitioners who
continually evaluate the effects of their choices
and actions on others (students, parents, and
other professionals in the learning community)
and actively seek out opportunities to grow
professionally.
10. Candidates communicate and interact with
parents/guardians, families, school colleagues,
and the community to support students’ learning
and well-being.
9K1-3
9D1-8
9D1-6
10K1-7
10D1-6
10P1-7
Pro
fess
ion
al G
row
th
TEP I Admission (Baccalaureate only)
• References
• Interview
TEP II Admission (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• References
• Interview
Student Teaching (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• Comprehensive evaluation form
• Post-observation reflections
• Seminar activities
• Portfolio (formative)
Program Completion (Baccalaureate & MAE)
• Portfolio (summative)
• Interview (Baccalaureate only)
• Comprehensive Exam (MAE only)
• Completion of Licensing Process
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 37 -
4.5 A DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM BY WHICH THE CANDIDATE PROFICIENCIES DESCRIBED IN
4.4 ARE REGULARLY ASSESSED:
Our unit uses several means of assessing and evaluating candidates. Assessment is taken
to mean the ongoing (formative) process by which candidates performance is monitored,
measured, and (if needed) remediated or corrected. Evaluation is taken to mean the final
(summative) measurement of acquired knowledge and skills. Assessments are designed to
create specific and useful feedback to candidates on what they are doing well, and what they
need to improve. Evaluations are used at specific checkpoints points in the program to allow or
block the passage of a candidate through transition points.
The Teacher Education Program Phases and Checkpoints
The Baccalaureate Teacher Education Program (TEP) consists of a five-step process for
each candidate’s progression toward teacher licensure at Cumberland and is marked by five
major assessment points detailed in Table 4.2 below. At each step in the progression process,
the candidate is assessed by the faculty on multiple indicators and sources of evidence, some
internal and some external to the unit.
Table 4.2
Transition Point Assessments Used
Transition point #1: Admission to the
School of Education
1. High School GPA;
2. ACT scores;
3. Completed and accepted application to Cumberland University.
Transition Point #2: Admission to
Teacher Education Program (Teacher
Education Program, Phase I)
Upon completion of all requirements,
the student will be recommended for
admission to the TEP Phase I. Admission
must be approved by a majority vote of
the Teacher Education Committee.
1. Complete ENG 101, ENG 102, ED 201, MATH 111 , and SPEE 220 with a
grade of “C” or better;
2. Have 40 cumulative hours earned (a minimum of 12 Cumberland
University hours) and have a minimum 2.75 GPA (Cumberland University
and cumulative);
3. Pass the Praxis I: Academic Skills Assessments and meet the minimum
required scores (or the Plato equivalent practice test). Students who have
obtained a composite of 22 on the ACT or a 1020 on the SAT before
enrollment at Cumberland University are exempt from this requirement;
4. Submit a letter of recommendation or a dispositions rating sheet by a
University faculty member
5. Pass a review of their electronic by the TEP I committee members yielding
predominantly “target” or higher scores;
6. Successfully complete a formal interview with the Teacher Education
Committee;
7. Submit evidence of having passed a background check by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and of having been fingerprinted.
Transition point #3: Admission to
student teaching (Teacher Education
1. Complete all professional education core requirements, all coursework
required for the major and all General Education Core coursework in the
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 38 -
Program Phase II). Those not seeking
licensure need to pass the checkpoint.
Upon successful completion of all
requirements, the student will be
recommended for admission into the
TEP II Program. Admission must be
approved by a majority vote of the
Teacher Education Committee.
teaching content area with a grade of “C” or better, with a B or better in ED
301;
2. Have a cumulative GPA of at least 2.75 as well as a minimum 2.75 on all
Cumberland University work when beginning the student teaching
semester;
3. Submit two letters of recommendation or dispositions rating sheets, one
by their advisor and one by another member of the University faculty OR
from a member of the local education community;
4. Pass all parts of the Praxis II assessment including the Principles of
Learning and Teaching and the appropriate Specialty Area tests and meet
the minimum cut-off scores for Tennessee licensure;
5. Pass a review of their electronic by the TEP II committee members
yielding predominantly “target” or higher scores;
6. Successfully complete a formal interview with the Teacher Education
Committee.
Transition point #4: Successful
completion of student teaching.
Upon successful completion of all
requirements, the student will be
recommended for program completion.
1. Evidence of successful student teaching (Lesson plans assessed yielding
predominantly “target” or higher scores, lesson observations of
predominantly “target” or higher scores; a “comprehensive evaluation” of
professional dispositions and practices yielding predominantly “target” or
higher scores);
2. Acceptable attendance and participation in seminars.
Transition point #5: Program
completion
1. Complete a major at Cumberland University that meets Teacher
Education Program requirements;
2. Complete all professional education core requirements, all coursework
required for the major and all General Education Core coursework in the
teaching content area with a grade of “C” or better);
3. Minimum cumulative GPA of 2.75 from all institutions attended and a
minimum 2.75 cumulative Cumberland University GPA;
4. Final reflective interview with the Teacher Education Committee yielding
predominantly “target” or higher scores.
Advanced Courses
The Master of Arts in Education degree was instituted in 1987 and received
accreditation from the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and
Schools in 1991. There are three tracks in the Master’s Program: Track I for licensed teachers or
individuals who do not wish to obtain licensure, Track II for students who seek to qualify for an
initial teaching license, and Track III for individuals teaching on an Alternate license. Track II of
the program, which satisfies initial licensure requirements for the State of Tennessee, was
approved in 1992 by the Board of Education of the State of Tennessee under the teacher
education policy mandated for implementation in 1994. Track III was created in 2001 in
response to the State of Tennessee Board of Education’s directive to teacher preparation
institutions to provide a program of quicker entry into the teaching profession for holders of a
baccalaureate degree but without a teacher license. The Masters of Arts in Education – Tracks I
and III are available via both traditional and distance delivery.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 39 -
Successful completion of the requirements for each of the five transition points
described below is required before the candidate receives an advanced degree.
Table 4.3
Transition Point Assessments Used
Transition point #1: Admission to
Cumberland University’s Graduate
Programs
Provide evidence of successful completion of a Baccalaureate degree from a
regionally accredited college or university. Official transcript(s) must be
received directly from the granting institution(s).
Transition point #2: Admission to
Master of Arts in Education Program
Submit satisfactory scores on the appropriate entrance examination:
Graduate Record Examination (composite of verbal and quantitative) 800
National Teacher Examination (core battery) 1950, Miller Analogies Test 27, or
Praxis II (PLT) elementary teachers 156, secondary teachers 159.
Transition point #3: Acceptance into
Track II, Enhanced student teaching
1. Maintenance of 3.0 GPA in all Master’s level courses;
2. Master’s Portfolio assessment yielding predominantly “target” or higher
scores;
3. Internship evaluations if present;
4. Submit two letters of recommendation or dispositions rating sheets, one by
their advisor and one by another member of the University faculty OR from a
member of the local education community;
5. Pass all parts of the Praxis II assessment including the Principles of Learning
and Teaching and the appropriate Specialty Area tests and meet the minimum
cut-off scores for Tennessee licensure;
6. Pass a review of their electronic by the TEP II committee members yielding
predominantly “target” or higher scores;
7. Successfully complete a formal interview with the Teacher Education
Committee.
Transition point #3a: Acceptance into
Track III, Alternative Licensure
Maintenance of 3.0 GPA in all Master’s level courses.
Transition point #4: Program
completion
1. Maintenance of 3.0 GPA in all Master’s level courses, totaling 36 hours
completed within 7 years;
2. Master’s Portfolio assessment yielding predominantly “target” or higher
scores;
3. Successfully complete a Comprehensive Written Examination near the
completion of all other degree requirements. A passing rate of 80% is required
on each section of the examination;
4. Finally, each student must receive the recommendation (approval) from the
Graduate Studies Council of CU.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 40 -
Bibliography
Adler, M. (1982). The Paideia proposal: An education manifesto. NY: Macmillan.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals.
Handbook 1, Cognitive domain: New York, David McKay.
Bluestein, Jane (2001). Creating Emotionally Safe Schools: A Guide for Educators and Parents.
Deerfield Beach: HCI.
Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper
& Row.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and
Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Bruner, J. (1977). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Calhoun, E. (2002). Action research for school improvement. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 18-
24.
Carroll, J. (1963). A Model of School Learning. The Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723-723.
Cochran-Smith, Marilyn (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education. Thousand
Oaks: Corwin Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Defining “Highly Qualified Teachers”: What does “Scientifically-
Based Research” Actually Tell Us. Educational Research, 31(9), 13-25.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience & Education (Touchstone, 1997 ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster
Inc.
Fetter, Wayne R. (2003, January). A conceptual model for integrating field experiences,
professional development schools, and performance assessment in a world of NCATE
2000. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Association of
Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Glasser, W. (1990). The quality of school: Managing students without coercion. New York:
HarperCollins Publishers.
Goodlad, J. I. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Holmes Group, The (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing,
MI: Authors.
Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the Teacher: A Qualitative Introduction to
School-based research. New York: Routledge.
Kelly, Victor ( 2004). The curriculum: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publishers.
Kennedy, M. (1997). The Connection Between Research and Practice. Educational Researcher,
26(7), 4-12.
Lambert, Nadine & McCombs, Barbara (Eds.) (1998). How students learn: Reforming schools
through learner-centered education. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological
Association.
Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Menand, Louis (2001). The metaphysical club. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 41 -
Noddings, Nel, (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2d ed.).
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child. New York: Routledge Press.
Piaget, J. (1983). The child's conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, & Co.
Shapiro, Joan & Stefkovich, Jacqueline (2001). Ethical leadership and decision making in
education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Mahwah: Lawrence
Earlbaum Associates.
Strickland, D. S. (1988). The Teacher as Researcher: Toward the Extended Professional.
Language Arts, 65(8), 754-764.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinstein, Rhona (1998). Positive expectations in schooling. In How students learn: Reforming
schools through learner-centered education, Lambert, N. & McCombs, B. (Eds.), 81-111.
Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 42 -
Appendix A: International New Teacher Assessment and
Support Consortium Standards Principle #1: The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he
or she teaches and can create learning experiences that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful for
students.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands major concepts, assumptions, debates, processes of inquiry, and ways of
knowing that are central to the discipline(s) s/he teaches.
• The teacher understands how students' conceptual frameworks and their misconceptions for an area of
knowledge can influence their learning.
• The teacher can relate his/her disciplinary knowledge to other subject areas.
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher realizes that subject matter knowledge is not a fixed body of facts but is complex and ever-
evolving. S/he seeks to keep abreast of new ideas and understandings in the field.
• The teacher appreciates multiple perspectives and conveys to learners how knowledge is developed from
the vantage point of the knower.
• The teacher has enthusiasm for the discipline(s) s/he teaches and sees connections to everyday life.
• The teacher is committed to continuous learning and engages in professional discourse about subject
matter knowledge and children's learning of the discipline.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher effectively uses multiple representations and explanations of disciplinary concepts that
capture key ideas and link them to students' prior understandings.
• The teacher can represent and use differing viewpoints, theories, "ways of knowing" and methods of
inquiry in his/her teaching of subject matter concepts.
• The teacher can evaluate teaching resources and curriculum materials for their comprehensiveness,
accuracy, and usefulness for representing particular ideas and concepts.
• The teacher engages students in generating knowledge and testing hypotheses according to the methods
of inquiry and standards of evidence used in the discipline.
• The teacher develops and uses curricula that encourage students to see, question, and interpret ideas
from diverse perspectives.
• The teacher can create interdisciplinary learning experiences that allow students to integrate knowledge,
skills, and methods of inquiry from several subject areas.
Principle #2: The teacher understands how children learn and develop, and can provide learning opportunities that
support their intellectual, social and personal development.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands how learning occurs--how students construct knowledge, acquire skills, and
develop habits of mind--and knows how to use instructional strategies that
• promote student learning.
• The teacher understands that students' physical, social, emotional, moral and cognitive development
influence learning and knows how to address these factors when making instructional decisions.
• The teacher is aware of expected developmental progressions and ranges of individual variation within
each domain (physical, social, emotional, moral and cognitive), can
• identify levels of readiness in learning, and understands how development in any one domain may affect
performance in others.
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher appreciates individual variation within each area of development, shows respect for the
diverse talents of all learners, and is committed to help them develop self confidence and competence.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 43 -
• The teacher is disposed to use students' strengths as a basis for growth, and their errors as an opportunity
for learning.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher assesses individual and group performance in order to design instruction that meets learners'
current needs in each domain (cognitive, social, emotional, moral, and
• physical) and that leads to the next level of development.
• The teacher stimulates student reflection on prior knowledge and links new ideas to already familiar
ideas, making connections to students' experiences, providing opportunities for active engagement,
manipulation, and testing of ideas and materials, and encouraging students to assume responsibility for
shaping their learning tasks.
• The teacher accesses students' thinking and experiences as a basis for instructional activities by, for
example, encouraging discussion, listening and responding to group interaction, and eliciting samples of
student thinking orally and in writing.
Principle #3: The teacher understands how students differ in their approaches to learning and creates instructional
opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands and can identify differences in approaches to learning and performance,
including different learning styles, multiple intelligences, and performance
• modes, and can design instruction that helps use students' strengths as the basis for growth.
• The teacher knows about areas of exceptionality in learning – including learning disabilities, visual and
perceptual difficulties, and special physical or mental challenges.
• The teacher knows about the process of second language acquisition and about strategies to support the
learning of students whose first language is not English.
• The teacher understands how students' learning is influenced by individual experiences, talents, and prior
learning, as well as language, culture, family and community values.
• The teacher has a well-grounded framework for understanding cultural and community diversity and
knows how to learn about and incorporate students' experiences, cultures, and community resources into
instruction.
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher believes that all children can learn at high levels and persists in helping all children achieve
success.
• The teacher appreciates and values human diversity, shows respect for students' varied talents and
perspectives, and is committed to the pursuit of "individually configured
• excellence."
• The teacher respects students as individuals with differing personal and family backgrounds and various
skills, talents, and interests.
• The teacher is sensitive to community and cultural norms.
• The teacher makes students feel valued for their potential as people, and helps them learn to value each
other.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher identifies and designs instruction appropriate to students' stages of development, learning
styles, strengths, and needs.
• The teacher uses teaching approaches that are sensitive to the multiple experiences of learners and that
address different learning and performance modes.
• The teacher makes appropriate provisions (in terms of time and circumstances for work, tasks assigned,
communication and response modes) for individual students who have
• particular learning differences or needs.
• The teacher can identify when and how to access appropriate services or resources to meet exceptional
learning needs.
• The teacher seeks to understand students' families, cultures, and communities, and uses this information
as a basis for connecting instruction to students' experiences (e.g. drawing explicit connections between
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 44 -
subject matter and community matters, making assignments that can be related to students' experiences
and cultures).
• The teacher brings multiple perspectives to the discussion of subject matter, including attention to
students' personal, family, and community experiences and cultural norms.
• The teacher creates a learning community in which individual differences are respected.
Principle #4: The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students'
development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands the cognitive processes associated with various kinds of learning (e.g. critical and
creative thinking, problem structuring and problem solving, invention,
• memorization and recall) and how these processes can be stimulated.
• The teacher understands principles and techniques, along with advantages and limitations, associated
with various instructional strategies (e.g. cooperative learning, direct instruction, discovery learning,
whole group discussion, independent study, interdisciplinary instruction).
• The teacher knows how to enhance learning through the use of a wide variety of materials as well as
human and technological resources (e.g. computers, audio-visual
• technologies, videotapes and discs, local experts, primary documents and artifacts, texts, reference books,
literature, and other print resources).
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher values the development of students' critical thinking, independent problem solving, and
performance capabilities.
• The teacher values flexibility and reciprocity in the teaching process as necessary for adapting instruction
to student responses, ideas, and needs.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher carefully evaluates how to achieve learning goals, choosing alternative teaching strategies
and materials to achieve different instructional purposes and to meet student needs (e.g. developmental
stages, prior knowledge, learning styles, and interests).
• The teacher uses multiple teaching and learning strategies to engage students in active learning
opportunities that promote the development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance
capabilities and that help student assume responsibility for identifying and using learning resources.
• The teacher constantly monitors and adjusts strategies in response to learner feedback.
• The teacher varies his or her role in the instructional process (e.g. instructor, facilitator, coach, audience)
in relation to the content and purposes of instruction and the needs of students.
• The teacher develops a variety of clear, accurate presentations and representations of concepts, using
alternative explanations to assist students' understanding and presenting
• diverse perspectives to encourage critical thinking.
Principle #5: The teacher uses an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a
learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-
motivation.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher can use knowledge about human motivation and behavior drawn from the foundational
sciences of psychology, anthropology, and sociology to develop strategies
• for organizing and supporting individual and group work.
• The teacher understands how social groups function and influence people, and how people influence
groups.
• The teacher knows how to help people work productively and cooperatively with each other in complex
social settings.
• The teacher understands the principles of effective classroom management and can use a range of
strategies to promote positive relationships, cooperation, and purposeful learning in the classroom.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 45 -
• The teacher recognizes factors and situations that are likely to promote or diminish intrinsic motivation,
and knows how to help students become self-motivated.
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher takes responsibility for establishing a positive climate in the classroom and participates in
maintaining such a climate in the school as whole.
• The teacher understands how participation supports commitment, and is committed to the expression
and use of democratic values in the classroom.
• The teacher values the role of students in promoting each other's learning and recognizes the importance
of peer relationships in establishing a climate of learning.
• The teacher recognizes the value of intrinsic motivation to students' life-long growth and learning.
• The teacher is committed to the continuous development of individual students' abilities and considers
how different motivational strategies are likely to encourage this
• development for each student.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher creates a smoothly functioning learning community in which students assume responsibility
for themselves and one another, participate in decisionmaking,
• work collaboratively and independently, and engage in purposeful learning activities.
• The teacher engages students in individual and cooperative learning activities that help them develop the
motivation to achieve, by, for example, relating lessons to students' personal interests, allowing students
to have choices in their learning, and leading students to ask questions and pursue problems that are
meaningful to them.
• The teacher organizes, allocates, and manages the resources of time, space, activities, and attention to
provide active and equitable engagement of students in productive tasks.
• The teacher maximizes the amount of class time spent in learning by creating expectations and processes
for communication and behavior along with a physical setting
• conducive to classroom goals.
• The teacher helps the group to develop shared values and expectations for student interactions, academic
discussions, and individual and group responsibility that create a positive classroom climate of openness,
mutual respect, support, and inquiry.
• The teacher analyzes the classroom environment and makes decisions and adjustments to enhance social
relationships, student motivation and engagement, and productive work.
• The teacher organizes, prepares students for, and monitors independent and group work that allows for
full and varied participation of all individuals.
Principle #6: The teacher uses knowledge of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to
foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the classroom.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands communication theory, language development, and the role of language in
learning.
• The teacher understands how cultural and gender differences can affect communication in the classroom.
• The teacher recognizes the importance of nonverbal as well as verbal communication.
• The teacher knows about and can use effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques.
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher recognizes the power of language for fostering self-expression, identity development, and
learning.
• The teacher values many ways in which people seek to communicate and encourages many modes of
communication in the classroom.
• The teacher is a thoughtful and responsive listener.
• The teacher appreciates the cultural dimensions of communication, responds appropriately, and seeks to
foster culturally sensitive communication by and among all students in the class.
PERFORMANCES
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 46 -
• The teacher models effective communication strategies in conveying ideas and information and in asking
questions (e.g. monitoring the effects of messages, restating ideas and drawing connections, using visual,
aural, and kinesthetic cues, being sensitive to nonverbal cues given and received).
• The teacher supports and expands learner expression in speaking, writing, and other media.
• The teacher knows how to ask questions and stimulate discussion in different ways for particular
purposes, for example, probing for learner understanding, helping students
• articulate their ideas and thinking processes, promoting risk taking and problem-solving, facilitating
factual recall, encouraging convergent and divergent thinking, stimulating
• curiosity, helping students to question.
• The teacher communicates in ways that demonstrate a sensitivity to cultural and gender differences (e.g.
appropriate use of eye contact, interpretation of body language and verbal statements, acknowledgment
of and responsiveness to different modes of communication and participation).
• The teacher knows how to use a variety of media communication tools, including audio-visual aids and
computers, to enrich learning opportunities.
Principle #7: The teacher plans instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and
curriculum goals.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands learning theory, subject matter, curriculum development, and student
development and knows how to use this knowledge in planning instruction to meet curriculum goals.
• The teacher knows how to take contextual considerations (instructional materials, individual student
interests, needs, and aptitudes, and community resources) into account in planning instruction that
creates an effective bridge between curriculum goals and students' experiences.
• The teacher knows when and how to adjust plans based on student responses and other contingencies.
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher values both long term and short term planning.
• The teacher believes that plans must always be open to adjustment and revision based on student needs
and changing circumstances.
• The teacher values planning as a collegial activity.
PERFORMANCES
• As an individual and a member of a team, the teacher selects and creates learning experiences that are
appropriate for curriculum goals, relevant to learners, and based upon principles of effective instruction
(e.g. that activate students' prior knowledge, anticipate preconceptions, encourage exploration and
problem-solving, and build new skills on those previously acquired).
• The teacher plans for learning opportunities that recognize and address variation in learning styles and
performance modes.
• The teacher creates lessons and activities that operate at multiple levels to meet the developmental and
individual needs of diverse learners and help each progress.
• The teacher creates short-range and long-term plans that are linked to student needs and performance,
and adapts the plans to ensure and capitalize on student progress and motivation.
• The teacher responds to unanticipated sources of input, evaluates plans in relation to short- and long-
range goals, and systematically adjusts plans to meet student needs and
• enhance learning.
Principle #8: The teacher understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure
the continuous intellectual, social and physical development of the learner.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands the characteristics, uses, advantages, and limitations of different types of
assessments (e.g. criterion-referenced and norm-referenced instruments,
• traditional standardized and performance-based tests, observation systems, and assessments of student
work) for evaluating how students learn, what they know and are able to do, and what kinds of
experiences will support their further growth and development.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 47 -
• The teacher knows how to select, construct, and use assessment strategies and instruments appropriate
to the learning outcomes being evaluated and to other diagnostic
• purposes.
• The teacher understands measurement theory and assessment related issues, such as validity, reliability,
bias, and scoring concerns.
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher values ongoing assessment as essential to the instructional process and recognizes that many
different assessment strategies, accurately and systematically used, are necessary for monitoring and
promoting student learning.
• The teacher is committed to using assessment to identify student strengths and promote student growth
rather than to deny students access to learning opportunities.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher appropriately uses a variety of formal and informal assessment techniques (e.g. observation,
portfolios of student work, teacher-made tests, performance tasks,
• projects, student self-assessments, peer assessment, and standardized tests) to enhance her or his
knowledge of learners, evaluate students' progress and performances, and
• modify teaching and learning strategies.
• The teacher solicits and uses information about students' experiences, learning behavior, needs, and
progress from parents, other colleagues, and the students themselves.
• The teacher uses assessment strategies to involve learners in self-assessment activities, to help them
become aware of their strengths and needs, and to encourage them to set personal goals for learning.
• The teacher evaluates the effect of class activities on both individuals and the class as a whole, collecting
information through observation of classroom interactions, questioning,
• and analysis of student work.
• The teacher monitors his or her own teaching strategies and behavior in relation to student success,
modifying plans and instructional approaches accordingly.
• The teacher maintains useful records of student work and performance and can communicate student
progress knowledgeably and responsibly, based on appropriate
• indicators, to students, parents, and other colleagues.
Principle #9: The teacher is a reflective practitioner who continually evaluates the effects of his/her choices and
actions on others (students, parents, and other professionals in the learning community) and who actively seeks
out opportunities to grow professionally.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands methods of inquiry that provide him/her with a variety of self-assessment and
problem-solving strategies for reflecting on his/her practice, its influences on students' growth and
learning, and the complex interactions between them.
• The teacher is aware of major areas of research on teaching and of resources available for professional
learning (e.g. professional literature, colleagues, professional associations,
• professional development activities).
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher values critical thinking and self-directed learning as habits of mind.
• The teacher is committed to reflection, assessment, and learning as an ongoing process.
• The teacher is willing to give and receive help.
• The teacher is committed to seeking out, developing, and continually refining practices that address the
individual needs of students.
• The teacher recognizes his/her professional responsibility for engaging in and supporting appropriate
professional practices for self and colleagues.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher uses classroom observation, information about students, and research as sources for
evaluating the outcomes of teaching and learning and as a basis for experimenting with, reflecting on, and
revising practice.
Cumberland University
School of Education Conceptual Framework
- 48 -
• The teacher seeks out professional literature, colleagues, and other resources to support his/her own
development as a learner and a teacher.
• The teacher draws upon professional colleagues within the school and other professional arenas as
supports for reflection, problem-solving and new ideas, actively sharing
• experiences and seeking and giving feedback.
Principle #10: The teacher fosters relationships with school colleagues, parents, and agencies in the larger
community to support students' learning and well-being.
KNOWLEDGE
• The teacher understands schools as organizations within the larger community context and understands
the operations of the relevant aspects of the system(s) within which s/he works.
• The teacher understands how factors in the students' environment outside of school (e.g. family
circumstances, community environments, health and economic conditions)
• may influence students' life and learning.
• The teacher understands and implements laws related to students' rights and teacher responsibilities (e.g.
for equal education, appropriate education for handicapped students,
• confidentiality, privacy, appropriate treatment of students, reporting in situations related to possible child
abuse).
DISPOSITIONS
• The teacher values and appreciates the importance of all aspects of a child's experience.
• The teacher is concerned about all aspects of a child's wellbeing (cognitive, emotional, social, and
physical), and is alert to signs of difficulties.
• The teacher is willing to consult with other adults regarding the education and well-being of his/her
students.
• The teacher respects the privacy of students and confidentiality of information.
• The teacher is willing to work with other professionals to improve the overall learning environment for
students.
PERFORMANCES
• The teacher participates in collegial activities designed to make the entire school a productive learning
environment.
• The teacher makes links with the learners' other environments on behalf of students, by consulting with
parents, counselors, teachers of other classes and activities within the schools, and professionals in other
community agencies.
• The teacher can identify and use community resources to foster student learning.
• The teacher establishes respectful and productive relationships with parents and guardians from diverse
home and community situations, and seeks to develop cooperative
• partnerships in support of student learning and well being.
• The teacher talks with and listens to the student, is sensitive and responsive to clues of distress,
investigates situations, and seeks outside help as needed and appropriate to remedy problems.
• The teacher acts as an advocate for students.